Maine · individual fact

Maine income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Maine’s tax structure.

Median household income$74.73K2020–2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$43.74K2020–2024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$57.48K2024 · #28 of 50 · highest first

Maine over time

Explore Maine readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Maine officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Maine effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Maine change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Maine · source units
MainePublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $57,480$44.22K$52.6K$60.99KMaine, 2014: $45,839Maine, 2015: $46,105Maine, 2016: $46,395Maine, 2017: $47,164Maine, 2018: $47,996Maine, 2019: $50,601Maine, 2020: $53,173Maine, 2021: $56,096Maine, 2022: $52,743Maine, 2023: $55,480Maine, 2024: $57,480201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Maine Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Maine delegation · 1◆ Governor · 2■ Maine agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

6 of 6 reviewed Maine actions match · 6 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Maine · 2024: $57,480 · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Maine Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodMaineRankU.S. benchmark
2024$57,480#28 of 50$59,195
2023$55,480#32 of 50$58,088
2022$52,743#40 of 50$57,104
2021$56,096#35 of 50$59,365
2020$53,173#36 of 50$56,514
2019$50,601#34 of 50$53,683
2018$47,996#39 of 50$52,242
2017$47,164#38 of 50$51,006
2016$46,395#35 of 50$49,828
2015$46,105#34 of 50$49,396
2014$45,839#29 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Maine · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Maine · 2020–2024$74,733
Maine rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · $74,7332020–2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $73,938 – $75,528Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine · your comparison$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$74,7332020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Maine households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Maine · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Maine · 2024$57,480
Maine rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maine
Real personal income per person history in Maine$43.81K$52.6K$61.39K20142024
2024 · Maine: $57,480 · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maine Real personal income per person history
PeriodMaineCompare
2014$45,839
2015$46,105
2016$46,395
2017$47,164
2018$47,996
2019$50,601
2020$53,173
2021$56,096
2022$52,743
2023$55,480
2024$57,480

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · $57,4802024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine · your comparison$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maine · state comparison

How Maine raises taxes

Maine's 2026 graduated schedule uses 5.8%, 6.75%, and 7.15% brackets. A 2% surcharge applies to taxable income above $1 million for single filers, $750,000 for married separate filers, and $1.5 million for joint and head-of-household filers. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Maine · FY2024$2.4B
Maine rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · $2.4BFY2024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine · your comparison$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Individual income tax

5.8%–7.15% + high-income surcharge

Maine's 2026 graduated schedule uses 5.8%, 6.75%, and 7.15% brackets. A 2% surcharge applies to taxable income above $1 million for single filers, $750,000 for married separate filers, and $1.5 million for joint and head-of-household filers.

Property tax

Municipal rates vary

Maine's property-tax system is principally administered locally, and municipal mill rates vary. Maine Revenue Services supervises valuation and publishes municipal rate information; there is no single representative statewide homeowner rate.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Maine income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Maine ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Maine candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

52 statements from 8 candidates

2026 Maine Governor — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 40 statements

Bobby Charles

1 statement

Republican · Governor · ME

Taxes & tax policy

Bobby Charles will reverse the heavy burden that businesses and working families face under high taxes and excessive regulations. He pledges to abolish the state income tax, slash unnecessary regulation, and cut the red tape that stifles economic growth, so Mainers can keep more of what they earn an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Bobby Charles will reverse the heavy burden that businesses and working families face under high taxes and excessive regulations. He pledges to abolish the state income tax, slash unnecessary regulation, and cut the red tape that stifles economic growth, so Mainers can keep more of what they earn and attract more opportunity to our state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bobby Charles — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Hannah Pingree

21 statements

Democratic · Governor · ME

Taxes & tax policy

Require Second Homes to Pay Their Fair Share: Hannah will adjust property tax law to allow municipalities to tax second homes owned by non-Maine residents at higher rates, ensuring seasonal and investment properties support the infrastructure and services they rely on and reducing the burden on Main…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Require Second Homes to Pay Their Fair Share: Hannah will adjust property tax law to allow municipalities to tax second homes owned by non-Maine residents at higher rates, ensuring seasonal and investment properties support the infrastructure and services they rely on and reducing the burden on Mainers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 20 more statements from Hannah Pingree
Taxes & tax policy

Expand job training tax credits to reward businesses that invest in upskilling their employees rather than replacing them with automation—extending Dirigo tax credits to every industry sector to support a more resilient, future-ready workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Expand job training tax credits to reward businesses that invest in upskilling their employees rather than replacing them with automation—extending Dirigo tax credits to every industry sector to support a more resilient, future-ready workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Income & wages

Improve enforcement of labor standards to ensure wage and hour laws, workplace safety rules, and benefit protections are consistently upheld across all industries

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Improve enforcement of labor standards to ensure wage and hour laws, workplace safety rules, and benefit protections are consistently upheld across all industries

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Deepen the Property Tax Fairness Credit: The Property Tax Fairness Credit helps low- and moderate-income homeowners and renters, but too many struggling households are left out or underserved. Hannah will expand eligibility so more households qualify and increase the maximum benefit to reflect today…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Deepen the Property Tax Fairness Credit: The Property Tax Fairness Credit helps low- and moderate-income homeowners and renters, but too many struggling households are left out or underserved. Hannah will expand eligibility so more households qualify and increase the maximum benefit to reflect today’s property tax burden. She will also simplify the application to increase participation, especially among seniors and renters.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Small businesses power Maine’s economy and it needs to be easier to start a business in Maine and manage regular state interactions, from tax filings to license applications. We need to modernize state systems, emphasize a one-stop approach, and speed up state approvals.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Small businesses power Maine’s economy and it needs to be easier to start a business in Maine and manage regular state interactions, from tax filings to license applications. We need to modernize state systems, emphasize a one-stop approach, and speed up state approvals.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Income & wages

Raising wages is not just about fairness, it is about strengthening Maine’s entire economy. When workers earn more, families are more stable, businesses retain talent, and communities grow stronger. America has seen growing wealth inequality, partially due to stagnating wages. Hannah’s plan focuses …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Raising wages is not just about fairness, it is about strengthening Maine’s entire economy. When workers earn more, families are more stable, businesses retain talent, and communities grow stronger. America has seen growing wealth inequality, partially due to stagnating wages. Hannah’s plan focuses on raising wages by expanding skills, improving job quality, strengthening worker bargaining power, and growing good-paying jobs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

Lower the barriers that hold back wages and workforce participation: Tackling the rising costs of child care, housing, transportation, and health care—so workers can take better jobs, increase their hours, and fully participate in the economy without being priced out of opportunity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Lower the barriers that hold back wages and workforce participation: Tackling the rising costs of child care, housing, transportation, and health care—so workers can take better jobs, increase their hours, and fully participate in the economy without being priced out of opportunity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Partner with Communities to Deliver Relief: Lasting relief requires real partnership between the state and municipalities. Hannah will give municipalities new local revenue options so they are less dependent on residential property taxes to fund essential services, support regional service sharing i…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Partner with Communities to Deliver Relief: Lasting relief requires real partnership between the state and municipalities. Hannah will give municipalities new local revenue options so they are less dependent on residential property taxes to fund essential services, support regional service sharing in areas like public safety and public works, planning and code enforcement, and solid waste to reduce costs for taxpayers, and she’ll maintain the state’s share of K-12 education funding to reduce pressure on local property tax bills.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

Strengthen the child care workforce: Sustain and grow the successful child care wage supplement program, supporting livable wages to recruit and retain early childhood educators. Expand career and technical education, registered apprenticeship programs, and higher education pathways into the field.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen the child care workforce: Sustain and grow the successful child care wage supplement program, supporting livable wages to recruit and retain early childhood educators. Expand career and technical education, registered apprenticeship programs, and higher education pathways into the field.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Hannah Pingree believes there’s more to be done for Maine people. As Governor, she will take immediate, practical steps to lower costs for Maine people. That means tackling housing and energy bills, making health care and childcare accessible, and restructuring Maine’s tax system so the wealthiest p…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Hannah Pingree believes there’s more to be done for Maine people. As Governor, she will take immediate, practical steps to lower costs for Maine people. That means tackling housing and energy bills, making health care and childcare accessible, and restructuring Maine’s tax system so the wealthiest pay their fair share and working families can afford their property taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

Ensure workers benefit from economic and technological change, including AI and automation, by encouraging shared productivity gains through wages, training, and job quality improvements

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology and communications

Candidate campaign source

Ensure workers benefit from economic and technological change, including AI and automation, by encouraging shared productivity gains through wages, training, and job quality improvements

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

From upending the public health system to attacking reproductive health care to cutting Medicaid and tax credits that lower premiums, Washington’s actions are harming Maine families. Congress must reform the health system – we need universal and affordable care for all Americans. But states can’t wa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

From upending the public health system to attacking reproductive health care to cutting Medicaid and tax credits that lower premiums, Washington’s actions are harming Maine families. Congress must reform the health system – we need universal and affordable care for all Americans. But states can’t wait for Washington. Hannah Pingree will partner with other strong governors to pursue solutions while using the power of state government to start fixing what’s broken and putting patients first.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Income & wages

Hannah’s economic agenda is built on a simple and optimistic vision: every child in Maine should have a fair shot at a good life, and every worker should be able to earn wages that actually keep up with the cost of living—no matter where they live. That means building an economy that works for every…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Hannah’s economic agenda is built on a simple and optimistic vision: every child in Maine should have a fair shot at a good life, and every worker should be able to earn wages that actually keep up with the cost of living—no matter where they live. That means building an economy that works for everyone—not just the wealthiest or most powerful. An economy that grows good-paying jobs worth staying for, lifts wages, strengthens Maine’s competitive edge, and gives every community the tools to shape its own future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

For too long, Maine’s tax system has asked more of those who can afford it least, while too many working families struggle to keep up with rising costs. Hannah will rebalance the system so that work is rewarded, wealth is taxed fairly, and middle- and low-income Mainers get real, lasting relief.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

For too long, Maine’s tax system has asked more of those who can afford it least, while too many working families struggle to keep up with rising costs. Hannah will rebalance the system so that work is rewarded, wealth is taxed fairly, and middle- and low-income Mainers get real, lasting relief.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Property taxes have risen faster than incomes, making it harder for homeowners, renters, and communities to keep up. Hannah will deliver meaningful property tax relief for Maine families while addressing the structural causes of rising municipal tax rates.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Property taxes have risen faster than incomes, making it harder for homeowners, renters, and communities to keep up. Hannah will deliver meaningful property tax relief for Maine families while addressing the structural causes of rising municipal tax rates.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

Protect the right to organize and collectively bargain so workers can negotiate for fair wages, benefits, and working conditions without fear or retaliation

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Protect the right to organize and collectively bargain so workers can negotiate for fair wages, benefits, and working conditions without fear or retaliation

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Maine has taken an important step forward with the new millionaire’s tax. Hannah will build on that progress by launching a thoughtful, transparent process to evaluate additional ways to make Maine’s tax system more progressive — ensuring those at the top pay their fair share, rewarding work, seekin…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Maine has taken an important step forward with the new millionaire’s tax. Hannah will build on that progress by launching a thoughtful, transparent process to evaluate additional ways to make Maine’s tax system more progressive — ensuring those at the top pay their fair share, rewarding work, seeking opportunities to export tax burden to visitors and non-residents, and reducing the burden on working and middle class Mainers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Hold the System Accountable: Maine can do more to reduce price gouging, profit skimming, and unnecessary complexity and barriers to coverage and care. Hannah’s plan will: Crack down on corporate and private equity buy-outs of health facilities that lead to loss of critical services, gaps in underser…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

Hold the System Accountable: Maine can do more to reduce price gouging, profit skimming, and unnecessary complexity and barriers to coverage and care. Hannah’s plan will: Crack down on corporate and private equity buy-outs of health facilities that lead to loss of critical services, gaps in underserved areas, and higher prices; Demand more from health insurers, health systems, and corporations that receive Maine taxpayer dollars or tax breaks, including strong efforts to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in the system; Make prescription drugs more affordable for Maine families by lowering out of pocket costs and protecting patients from unfair and unpredictable price increases. Reduce drug costs by expanding bulk and multi-state purchasing agreements, increasing transparency around drug pricing and rebates, and pursue state-level authority to limit excessive price hikes on essential medications. Leverage the negotiating power of state government, Maine’s largest employer, to reduce prescription drug prices for State workers by capping prices based on Medicare negotiation and other rates and support other large employers to do the same; Reduce paperwork and place limits on prior authorization that put distance between patients and their doctors and waste time and money for both; and Improve the process to enroll in MaineCare and CoverME.gov to maintain the gains Maine has made in getting people covered.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Income & wages

Invest in Maine’s workforce and raise wages through skills and training: Expanding apprenticeships and career pathways, education opportunities, and hands-on training in high-demand fields so workers can move into better-paying jobs and advance over time.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Invest in Maine’s workforce and raise wages through skills and training: Expanding apprenticeships and career pathways, education opportunities, and hands-on training in high-demand fields so workers can move into better-paying jobs and advance over time.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Supporting succession planning and next-generation ownership by expanding technical assistance, financing and land acquisition tools (like Land for Future for working farmland), and tax incentives that help family businesses transition successfully—keeping working lands, waterfronts, and natural res…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Supporting succession planning and next-generation ownership by expanding technical assistance, financing and land acquisition tools (like Land for Future for working farmland), and tax incentives that help family businesses transition successfully—keeping working lands, waterfronts, and natural resource enterprises in Maine hands.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Expand and modernize the Seed Capital Tax Credit to attract more early-stage investment into Maine startups—making it easier for entrepreneurs to launch and scale companies in emerging industries.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Expand and modernize the Seed Capital Tax Credit to attract more early-stage investment into Maine startups—making it easier for entrepreneurs to launch and scale companies in emerging industries.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗

John Glowa

2 statements

Independent/Unenrolled · Governor · ME

Taxes & tax policy

Generally speaking, Maine needs to spend more public monies helping people who need help. This money will largely come from shifting existing tax revenues to housing and homeless programs, increasing tax contributions from the wealthy, operating government more efficiently and effectively, eliminati…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Generally speaking, Maine needs to spend more public monies helping people who need help. This money will largely come from shifting existing tax revenues to housing and homeless programs, increasing tax contributions from the wealthy, operating government more efficiently and effectively, eliminating special interest tax exemptions, and carefully identifying and decreasing waste, fraud and abuse of public funds and programs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John Glowa — candidate-owned primary source 13 ↗
View 1 more statement from John Glowa
Taxes & tax policy

I write this to let you know that I have been there. My mother was lucky. She had a son to help her. Unfortunately, many of Maine’s elderly have no one or are neglected by family. Maine must put people first. We must re-prioritize our spending, work more efficiently and effectively, and restructure …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

I write this to let you know that I have been there. My mother was lucky. She had a son to help her. Unfortunately, many of Maine’s elderly have no one or are neglected by family. Maine must put people first. We must re-prioritize our spending, work more efficiently and effectively, and restructure our tax system to have the resources needed to help our seniors and their families. We must focus our resources on those who need them the most. As the state with the highest median age, we have a lot of work to do.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John Glowa — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗

Rick Bennett

16 statements

Independent · Governor · ME

Taxes & tax policy

#2: Deliver meaningful property tax relief Too many Mainers are looking across our state lines for cheaper taxes. You should not be taxed out of your home. As Governor, I will expand property tax relief for Maine homeowners through stronger income-sensitive protections and an expanded homestead exem…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Fairer Tax System & Spending Accountability

Candidate campaign source

#2: Deliver meaningful property tax relief Too many Mainers are looking across our state lines for cheaper taxes. You should not be taxed out of your home. As Governor, I will expand property tax relief for Maine homeowners through stronger income-sensitive protections and an expanded homestead exemption

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
View 15 more statements from Rick Bennett
Taxes & tax policy

Mainers are not just frustrated by taxes. We trust the government less and are told to pay more. My plan is to lower the pressure on families, especially with property taxes, and make government prove it is worth what it costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: DELIVERING A FAIRER TAX SYSTEM WITH REAL ACCOUNTABILITY ON SPENDING

Candidate campaign source

Mainers are not just frustrated by taxes. We trust the government less and are told to pay more. My plan is to lower the pressure on families, especially with property taxes, and make government prove it is worth what it costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

#1: Eliminate corruption and make every tax dollar count

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: #1: Eliminate corruption and make every tax dollar count

Candidate campaign source

#1: Eliminate corruption and make every tax dollar count

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

#4. Make tax breaks accountable to Mainers

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: #4. Make tax breaks accountable to Mainers

Candidate campaign source

#4. Make tax breaks accountable to Mainers

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

#4. Make tax breaks accountable to Mainers If taxpayers are subsidizing something, you deserve to know what you're getting back. As Governor, I will regularly review so you can see what is working and what is not. Every program will need to earn its renewal by delivering real benefits to the people …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Fairer Tax System & Spending Accountability

Candidate campaign source

#4. Make tax breaks accountable to Mainers If taxpayers are subsidizing something, you deserve to know what you're getting back. As Governor, I will regularly review so you can see what is working and what is not. Every program will need to earn its renewal by delivering real benefits to the people paying for it .

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Child care is economic infrastructure, and Maine’s economy is paying the price when working parents cannot find dependable care. As Governor, I will expand employer-supported child care through public-private partnerships and refundable tax credits so more businesses can help create new child care o…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Treating Child Care as Essential

Candidate campaign source

Child care is economic infrastructure, and Maine’s economy is paying the price when working parents cannot find dependable care. As Governor, I will expand employer-supported child care through public-private partnerships and refundable tax credits so more businesses can help create new child care options, expand capacity, and make care more affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

When Augusta pushes costs downhill, your local property tax bill goes up. As Governor, I will fully fund revenue sharing and strengthen the state-local partnership so Augusta stops pushing costs onto towns and property taxpayers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: #3. Coordinate state-local government functions to cut costs

Candidate campaign source

When Augusta pushes costs downhill, your local property tax bill goes up. As Governor, I will fully fund revenue sharing and strengthen the state-local partnership so Augusta stops pushing costs onto towns and property taxpayers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

#2: Deliver meaningful property tax relief

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Fairer Tax System & Spending Accountability

Candidate campaign source

#2: Deliver meaningful property tax relief

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

#3. Coordinate state-local government functions to cut costs When Augusta pushes costs downhill, your local property tax bill goes up. As Governor, I will fully fund revenue sharing and strengthen the state-local partnership so Augusta stops pushing costs onto towns and property taxpayers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Fairer Tax System & Spending Accountability

Candidate campaign source

#3. Coordinate state-local government functions to cut costs When Augusta pushes costs downhill, your local property tax bill goes up. As Governor, I will fully fund revenue sharing and strengthen the state-local partnership so Augusta stops pushing costs onto towns and property taxpayers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

#4. Expand employer-supported child care Child care is economic infrastructure, and Maine’s economy is paying the price when working parents cannot find dependable care. As Governor, I will expand employer-supported child care through public-private partnerships and refundable tax credits so more bu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Treating Child Care as Essential

Candidate campaign source

#4. Expand employer-supported child care Child care is economic infrastructure, and Maine’s economy is paying the price when working parents cannot find dependable care. As Governor, I will expand employer-supported child care through public-private partnerships and refundable tax credits so more businesses can help create new child care options, expand capacity, and make care more affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Income & wages

#2. Invest in early childhood educators Child care cannot become more affordable or more available if the people providing it cannot afford to stay in the profession. Early childhood educators are the workforce behind the workforce, but too many are underpaid and over burdened. As Governor, I will s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Treating Child Care as Essential

Candidate campaign source

#2. Invest in early childhood educators Child care cannot become more affordable or more available if the people providing it cannot afford to stay in the profession. Early childhood educators are the workforce behind the workforce, but too many are underpaid and over burdened. As Governor, I will support permanent wage supplements, strengthen career pathways and scholarships, and treat early childhood educators like the professionals they are so Maine can recruit, retain, and grow the workforce families depend on.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

As Governor, my commitment is to you, your family and the future of our state. I will be relentlessly focused on delivering results - from housing, taxes, energy, health care, and child care to the basic job of making government work for you.. I am laying out exactly what I will do as Governor to cu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: CUT THE COSTS CRUSHING MAINE FAMILIES

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, my commitment is to you, your family and the future of our state. I will be relentlessly focused on delivering results - from housing, taxes, energy, health care, and child care to the basic job of making government work for you.. I am laying out exactly what I will do as Governor to cut costs, lower your bills, and grow economic opportunity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Too many Mainers are looking across our state lines for cheaper taxes. You should not be taxed out of your home. As Governor, I will expand property tax relief for Maine homeowners through stronger income-sensitive protections and an expanded homestead exemption

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Fairer Tax System & Spending Accountability

Candidate campaign source

Too many Mainers are looking across our state lines for cheaper taxes. You should not be taxed out of your home. As Governor, I will expand property tax relief for Maine homeowners through stronger income-sensitive protections and an expanded homestead exemption

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Income & wages

Child care cannot become more affordable or more available if the people providing it cannot afford to stay in the profession. Early childhood educators are the workforce behind the workforce, but too many are underpaid and over burdened. As Governor, I will support permanent wage supplements, stren…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Treating Child Care as Essential

Candidate campaign source

Child care cannot become more affordable or more available if the people providing it cannot afford to stay in the profession. Early childhood educators are the workforce behind the workforce, but too many are underpaid and over burdened. As Governor, I will support permanent wage supplements, strengthen career pathways and scholarships, and treat early childhood educators like the professionals they are so Maine can recruit, retain, and grow the workforce families depend on.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Before government asks you and your family for more of your hard-earned money, it should prove it is spending wisely. As Governor, I will reform the state budget process to bring more discipline, transparency, and value to how Maine spends your tax dollars. I will also create the Office of Inspector…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Fairer Tax System & Spending Accountability

Candidate campaign source

Before government asks you and your family for more of your hard-earned money, it should prove it is spending wisely. As Governor, I will reform the state budget process to bring more discipline, transparency, and value to how Maine spends your tax dollars. I will also create the Office of Inspector General, reporting directly to me, to investigate any allegations of corruption so your voice is not drowned out by insiders and backroom politics .

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

I support open competition for public contracts, stronger accountability in state contracting and payments, and a budget process that is transparent and accessible to the public. Mainers should be able to see how money is being spent, whether the government is meeting its obligations, and whether pu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fix the Corrupt System

Candidate campaign source

I support open competition for public contracts, stronger accountability in state contracting and payments, and a budget process that is transparent and accessible to the public. Mainers should be able to see how money is being spent, whether the government is meeting its obligations, and whether public programs are actually delivering results. As Governor, I will end insider dealing and crack down on wasteful spending so you know your tax dollars are working for you. Every dollar collected from Maine people should deliver real value to the people - not protect a broken political culture. That means more discipline, more scrutiny, more transparency, and far less tolerance for the insider habits that keep failing Mainers year after year.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett — campaign source ↗

2026 Maine U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Ron Russell

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · ME

Taxes & tax policy

Taxes

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: What We Can Achieve Together

Candidate campaign source

Taxes

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ron Russell — Taxes ↗
View 1 more statement from Ron Russell
Taxes & tax policy

We must continue to lower taxes for working Maine families and our small businesses. We must take a comprehensive approach to reducing regulation, and ensuring what we’re doing makes good common sense, but doesn’t unnecessarily burden business. We need to focus on reducing government bureaucracy and…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy and the Economy

Candidate campaign source

We must continue to lower taxes for working Maine families and our small businesses. We must take a comprehensive approach to reducing regulation, and ensuring what we’re doing makes good common sense, but doesn’t unnecessarily burden business. We need to focus on reducing government bureaucracy and red-tape.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ron Russell campaign source 11 ↗

2026 Maine U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Matt Dunlap

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · ME

Income & wages

Protect Social Security benefits.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security

Candidate campaign source

Protect Social Security benefits.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Matt Dunlap
Income & wages

I am 100% pro-labor. As a former labor union member, I’ll be a steadfast pro-union voice in Congress. That means fighting for workers’ rights through legislation like the PRO Act, defending fair wages, safe working conditions, and the right to organize. At the same time, I’ll ensure that trade polic…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

I am 100% pro-labor. As a former labor union member, I’ll be a steadfast pro-union voice in Congress. That means fighting for workers’ rights through legislation like the PRO Act, defending fair wages, safe working conditions, and the right to organize. At the same time, I’ll ensure that trade policies work for Maine families and industries. Maine workers built this state—we need a Congress that fights for them.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

More often than any other issue, I hear worries about affordable health care. Paul LePage supported the Medicaid cuts that are leaving too many Mainers without care and forcing hospitals across the state to shut down maternity wards and other clinics. Meanwhile Big Pharma keeps jacking up the price …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

More often than any other issue, I hear worries about affordable health care. Paul LePage supported the Medicaid cuts that are leaving too many Mainers without care and forcing hospitals across the state to shut down maternity wards and other clinics. Meanwhile Big Pharma keeps jacking up the price of lifesaving drugs, leaving them out of reach at a time when families are struggling to pay the bills. In Congress, I’ll be a champion for protecting Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid, and I’ll work to fight to expand coverage so more people have the care they need. Medicare for All will help us ensure that we’re spending your tax dollars on health care for Mainers rather than foreign wars or other misguided priorities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Paul LePage

3 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · ME

Taxes & tax policy

Creating Jobs, Growing Our EconomyLower taxes. Less red tape. More jobs for Maine families. As a job creator, Paul knows what must be done.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Creating Jobs, Growing Our EconomyLower taxes. Less red tape. More jobs for Maine families. As a job creator, Paul knows what must be done.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Paul LePage — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 2 more statements from Paul LePage
Taxes & tax policy

Lower Taxes and Reduce Red Tape

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fighting for Maine's Future

Candidate campaign source

Lower Taxes and Reduce Red Tape

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Paul LePage — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Lower taxes. Less red tape. More jobs for Maine families. As a job creator, Paul knows what must be done.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Creating Jobs, Growing Our Economy

Candidate campaign source

Lower taxes. Less red tape. More jobs for Maine families. As a job creator, Paul knows what must be done.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Paul LePage — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Maine candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Maine incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Maine legislators and Maine’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Maine’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 Maine incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Ambureen Rana

Maine House of Representatives, District 21 · D–ME

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ambureen Rana
Maine Legislature · LD 2116

An Act to Extend the Sunset Date of the Affordable Housing Income Tax Credit

Apr 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 699

Rep. Ambureen Rana · Sponsored / Sen. Chip Curry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Gary Friedmann · Co-sponsored / Rep. Drew Gattine · Co-sponsored / Rep. Traci Gere · Co-sponsored / Sen. Teresa S. Pierce · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LD 2116 extends the affordable housing income tax credit allocation window from 2028 through 2036. It retains the $10 million base annual allocation, carry-forward and returned-credit rules, and a $15 million annual allocation ceiling. Rural-preservation reservations and other limits remain. The final law extends the sunset date; it does not make the credit permanent, guarantee construction or establish lower rents.

Law chapter 699, approved 2026-04-15. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Median gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Credits supporting affordable housing concern rental supply and costs, without demonstrating completed homes or a change in median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maine evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 1. 36 MRSA §5219-WW, sub-§3, as enacted by PL 2019, c. 555, §6, is amended to read: 3. Maximum credit; carry-forward. The total credit amount available pursuant to this section and section 2534 to be allocated by the authority for each calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2021 and ending on or before December 31, 2036 is subject to the following limitations. A. The total allocation may not exceed $10,000,000. Any portion of that amount not allocated in a calendar year may be carried forward and available to be allocated in subsequent calendar years, except that: (1) Any previously allocated credits returned to the authority, excluding any credits recaptured under subsection 7, must be added to that amount; and (2) The authority may not allocate more than $15,000,000 in any calendar year. B. No more than 20% of credits allocated in any calendar year may be allocated under subsection 2, paragraph B. C. Ten percent of credits first available to be allocated in any calendar year must be set aside to be allocated for the purpose of qualified rural development preservation projects pursuant to subsection 2, paragraph B. Any portion of the amount under this paragraph not allocated in a calendar year must be carried forward and be available to be allocated in subsequent calendar years for the purpose of qualified rural development preservation projects. To the extent that any amounts set aside under this paragraph are not allocated on or before December 31, 2036, those amounts may be allocated by the authority without regard to whether the project is a qualified rural development preservation project. D. Only those credits that have been carried forward or returned, excluding any credits recaptured under subsection 7, as described in this subsection may be allocated by the authority after December 31, 2036.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Amy Roeder

Maine House of Representatives, District 23 · D–ME

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Amy Roeder
Maine Legislature · LD 54

An Act to Require Employers to Disclose Pay Ranges and Maintain Records of Employees' Pay Histories

Apr 24, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 771

Rep. Amy Roeder · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LD 54 requires employers with at least 10 employees to include prospective pay ranges in job postings and identify commission-only positions. Employers must disclose an employee’s own position pay range on request and retain position and pay-history records during employment and for three years afterward. The law funds an additional labor inspector. Disclosure and recordkeeping do not themselves raise wages or household income.

Law chapter 771, approved 2026-04-24. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Household money income includes wages before taxes. Pay-range disclosure concerns workers’ wage information, without setting a minimum wage or demonstrating a change in the statewide median household income. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maine evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 1. 26 MRSA §622-A is enacted to read: §622-A. Pay transparency This section governs disclosure and record keeping by employers of employee pay information. 1. Definitions. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise indicates, the following terms have the following meanings. A. "Posting" means a solicitation that is intended to recruit employment applicants for a specific available position and that includes qualifications for desired applicants, including recruitment done directly by an employer or indirectly through a 3rd party. "Posting" includes postings made electronically or with a printed hard copy. B. "Range of pay" means the range of pay that an employer anticipates relying on in setting wages for a position, including, but not limited to, reference to: (1) Any applicable pay scale; (2) A previously determined range of wages for the position; (3) The actual range of wages for those currently holding equivalent positions; or (4) The budgeted amount for the position. "Range of pay" does not include compensation that is based solely on commission. 2. Employer with 10 or more employees. An employer that has 10 or more employees shall ensure that a posting includes a statement that lists the prospective range of pay the employer will offer to a successful applicant unless the position that is the subject of the posting is compensated solely on the basis of commission, in which case the required posted statement must indicate that the compensation for the position is based solely on commission.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham

Maine House of Representatives, District 12 · R–ME

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham
Maine Legislature · LD 1093

An Act to Create a Seasonal Gas Tax Exemption and Rate

May 2, 2023 · Not enacted

Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham · Sponsored / Rep. William Pluecker · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tracy Quint · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LD 1093 proposed exempting covered motor fuel from Maine excise tax annually from Thanksgiving Day until May 1 and imposing a 40-cent-per-gallon rate during the rest of the year. Jet and turbojet fuel would retain a 3.4-cent rate. The proposal received an ought-not-to-pass disposition on May 2, 2023 and did not become law. It establishes neither a tax holiday nor savings at the pump, and Maine is only part of the New England price region.

Ought Not to Pass Pursuant To Joint Rule 310, May 2, 2023 The proposal did not become law.

Why this record is included

The EIA fact is a New England regional regular-gasoline price proxy, not a Maine-only price. Maine fuel-tax changes concern one component in one of the region’s six states, without establishing a regional price change or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maine evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: 2 Sec. 1. 36 MRSA §2903, sub-§1, as amended by PL 2019, c. 379, Pt. B, §7, is 3 repealed and the following enacted in its place: 4 1. Excise tax imposed. Any fuel containing at least 10% internal combustion engine 5 fuel is subject to the tax imposed by this section. 6 A. An excise tax is imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this 7 State, including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, at the rate of 8 40.0¢ per gallon. 9 B. Notwithstanding paragraph A and except as provided in paragraph C, an excise tax 10 may not be imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this State, 11 including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, from 12:00 a.m. on 12 Thanksgiving Day until the following 12:00 a.m. on May 1st. 13 C. An excise tax is imposed at a rate of 3.4¢ per gallon on internal combustion engine 14 fuel bought or used for the purpose of propelling jet or turbojet engine aircraft.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Susan M. Collins

U.S. Senate, Maine · R–ME

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Susan M. Collins
U.S. Congress · Maine delegation · S 3924

We Can't Wait Act of 2026

Feb 25, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Susan M. Collins · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 3924 proposes letting eligible disabled people below early retirement age elect Social Security disability benefits during the waiting period in exchange for reduced benefits throughout that period of eligibility. For initial entitlement in the program’s first 36 months, the benefit factor would be 94.25%; later cohorts would use certified actuarial factors. Other people’s benefits on the worker’s record would be unaffected. The bill remains in Congress and establishes no new payments or Maine beneficiary increase.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts OASDI beneficiaries in current payment. An option for earlier disability-insurance benefits concerns the disability component of OASDI, not SSI, Medicare, all beneficiaries or a demonstrated increase in Maine’s beneficiary count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maine evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Election to receive(a)In generalSection 223(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423) is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), in the matter following subparagraph (E), by striking (i) and all that follows through , (ii) in and inserting (i) for each month beginning with the first month after the individual’s waiting period (as defined in subsection (c)(2)) in which the individual becomes so entitled to such insurance benefits unless the individual elects to receive insurance benefits during such waiting period in accordance with paragraph (3), (ii) in the case of an individual electing to receive insurance benefits during the individual’s waiting period pursuant to the preceding clause and in;(2)in paragraph (2), by striking and section 215(b)(2)(A)(ii) and inserting , section 215(b)(2)(A)(ii), and paragraph (3) of this subsection,; and(3)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(3)(A)An individual who has not attained early retirement age (as defined in section 216(l)(2)) may elect to receive disability insurance benefits during the individual’s waiting period pursuant to paragraph (1) if such individual or their appointed representative makes such election in writing (which may include selecting an option on a benefit application form) during—(i)in the case of an individual who has applied for but not yet received a decision on their application for such disability insurance benefits before the date on which this paragraph takes effect—(I)the 45-day period following such date, or(II)the 10-day period (if such period ends later than the end of the 45-day period) following the date on which such individual receives a decision on such application which is favorable to such individual, (ii)in the case of an individual applying for disability insurance benefits on or after the date on which this paragraph takes effect—(I)the date on which such individual files an application for disability insurance benefit, or during the 10-day period following such date,(II)the date on which such individual requests reconsideration of the initial determination, or during the 10-day period following such date, or(III)the date on which such individual requests a hearing by an administrative law judge, or during the 10-day period following such date, (iii)in the case of an individual whose interest the Commissioner of Social Security determines would be served by making payment of the individual’s benefit to a representative payee (within the meaning of section 205(j)), such individual’s election may be revoked or confirmed by such representative payee during the 10-day period beginning on the date on which such representative payee is selected, and(iv)in the case of an individual who elects to receive disability insurance benefits during such individual’s waiting period pursuant to paragraph (1), the individual may revoke such election during the periods described in this subparagraph, except that in no event shall such elections or revocations occur in the first month of an established period of eligibility.(B)In the case of an individual electing to receive a disability insurance benefit during the individual’s waiting period pursuant to paragraph (1), such individual's disability insurance benefit for any month during or after such waiting period shall—(i)be equal to the product of—(I)the disability insurance benefit amount determined under paragraph (2) (as determined before application of this paragraph), multiplied by(II)the percentage determined under subparagraph (C) for the month during which such individual first becomes entitled to such disability insurance benefit,(ii)continue unchanged for the entire period of eligibility for such disability insurance benefit, and without the effect of recalculations described under subparagraph (C), and(iii)if applicable, be paid as part of a claim of entitlement to past-due benefits under this title and included in the total dollar amount of such past-due benefits.(C)The percentage determined under this subparagraph shall be—(i)for any month in the 36-month period beginning with the first month that begins after the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this paragraph, 94.25 percent, and(ii)for any subsequent month, the percentage most recently certified by the Commissioner under paragraph (D)(ii).(D)(i)Not later than the end of the 36-month period described under subparagraph (C)(i), and not later than the end of every 5-year period thereafter, the Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration shall calculate a percentage such that the fiscal impact over a 75-year period upon the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund if all individuals who applied pursuant to paragraph (1) to receive disability insurance benefits made an election to receive benefits during their waiting periods is equal to the fiscal impact over such period upon such Trust Fund that would have been made if all individuals who applied had not made such election.(ii)Not later than the end of the 36-month period described under subparagraph (C)(i), and not later than the end of every 5-year period thereafter, the Commissioner—(I)if the percentage calculated by the Chief Actuary in accordance with clause (i) is greater than or equal to 91 percent, shall certify to the Managing Trustee such percentage, or(II)if such percentage is less than 91 percent, may elect not to certify such percentage to the Managing Trustee.(iii)Not later than 2 years after the Commissioner elects not to certify any percentage calculated by the Chief Actuary, the Chief Actuary shall prepare and deliver a report to Congress, including detailed recommendations for administrative or legislative actions to permit individuals eligible for disability insurance benefits to receive disability insurance benefits during the disability insurance benefit waiting period such that the fiscal impact over a 75-year period upon the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund is actuarially neutral.(E)No election made or not made by an individual pursuant to this paragraph shall be construed to have any effect on any benefits payable to any other individual on the basis of such individual’s wages and self-employment income.(F)The Commissioner shall make available to the general public by posting on a website information relating to electing to receive disability insurance benefits during the waiting period, including a calculator which an individual may use to determine the effect of electing to receive disability insurance benefits during the waiting period on the individual’s disability insurance benefit.(G)Each application for entitlement to disability insurance benefits that may subject the individual to the waiting period pursuant to paragraph (1) shall allow for new elections or revocations under this paragraph. .(b)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to applications for disability insurance benefits that are made or pending on or after the first day of the first month that begins after the date which is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.(c)Update to Social Security disability formsNot later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall update the application forms for applying for disability insurance benefits to include an option for applicants to elect to receive disability insurance benefits during their waiting period.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Maine officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Maine statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.