Compare Maine’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.
BLS does not publish a statewide Maine CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.
All-items price level97.12024 · #25 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level97.22024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level78.92024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
Maine over time
Explore Maine readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Maine officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Maine effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Maine change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
All-items price level Maine · source units
MainePublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
3 of 3 reviewed Maine actions match · 3 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.
Maine · 2024: 97.1 · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Maine with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Maine · state comparison
How does Maine’s cost of living compare?
The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.
Maine · 202497.1
Maine rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
All-items price level
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.
Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Maine with the published U.S. category value shown.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maine
2024 · Maine: 97.1 · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maine All-items price level history
Period
Maine
Compare
2014
92.5
2015
95.9
2016
97.2
2017
97.6
2018
97.6
2019
95.6
2020
97.9
2021
97.3
2022
100.7
2023
98
2024
97.1
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 97.12024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
110.7
—
#2
Hawaii
110
—
#3
New Jersey
108.8
—
#4
New York
107.9
—
#5
Washington
107
—
#6
Massachusetts
105.8
—
#7
Maryland
105
—
#8
New Hampshire
104.2
—
#9
Connecticut
103.6
—
#10
Florida
103.4
—
#11
Oregon
103.4
—
#12
Colorado
103.1
—
#13
Alaska
102.4
—
#14
Rhode Island
102.3
—
#15
Virginia
101.1
—
#16
Arizona
100.7
—
#17
Nevada
100
—
#18
Illinois
100
—
#19
Delaware
99.8
—
#20
Utah
98.9
—
#21
Minnesota
98.6
—
#22
Vermont
98
—
#23
Pennsylvania
97.6
—
#24
Texas
97.1
—
#25
Maine · your comparison
97.1
—
#26
Georgia
96.3
—
#27
Michigan
96.2
—
#28
Idaho
95.5
—
#29
Montana
94.6
—
#30
North Carolina
94.3
—
#31
Wisconsin
94.1
—
#32
South Carolina
93.7
—
#33
Indiana
93.3
—
#34
Ohio
92.8
—
#35
Wyoming
92.7
—
#36
New Mexico
92.2
—
#37
Tennessee
91.9
—
#38
Missouri
90.8
—
#39
Kentucky
90.2
—
#40
Nebraska
90.1
—
#41
Kansas
90.1
—
#42
West Virginia
89.5
—
#43
North Dakota
89
—
#44
Alabama
88.8
—
#45
South Dakota
88.6
—
#46
Louisiana
88.2
—
#47
Oklahoma
87.8
—
#48
Iowa
87.8
—
#49
Mississippi
87
—
#50
Arkansas
86.9
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
Maine · 20241.7%
Maine rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual change in regional price deflator
Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.
An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maine
2024 · Maine: 1.7% · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maine Annual change in regional price deflator history
Period
Maine
Compare
2015
3.8%
2016
2.4%
2017
2.1%
2018
2.1%
2019
-0.7%
2020
3.5%
2021
3.5%
2022
10.3%
2023
0.9%
2024
1.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 1.7%2024 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Montana
6.7%
—
#2
Idaho
6.2%
—
#3
Utah
6%
—
#4
Nevada
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Mexico
4%
—
#7
Indiana
4%
—
#8
Wyoming
3.9%
—
#9
Illinois
3.9%
—
#10
Colorado
3.8%
—
#11
Delaware
3.7%
—
#12
Ohio
3.6%
—
#13
Wisconsin
3.6%
—
#14
North Dakota
3.5%
—
#15
Vermont
3.5%
—
#16
South Dakota
3.1%
—
#17
Maryland
3%
—
#18
Minnesota
3%
—
#19
Kentucky
2.9%
—
#20
South Carolina
2.9%
—
#21
Hawaii
2.9%
—
#22
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#23
Mississippi
2.8%
—
#24
Kansas
2.8%
—
#25
Pennsylvania
2.8%
—
#26
Arkansas
2.8%
—
#27
New York
2.7%
—
#28
Arizona
2.6%
—
#29
North Carolina
2.5%
—
#30
Texas
2.5%
—
#31
New Jersey
2.5%
—
#32
West Virginia
2.5%
—
#33
Nebraska
2.4%
—
#34
Georgia
2.4%
—
#35
Florida
2.4%
—
#36
Virginia
2.4%
—
#37
Tennessee
2.4%
—
#38
Alabama
2.3%
—
#39
Missouri
2.3%
—
#40
Louisiana
2%
—
#41
Connecticut
2%
—
#42
Alaska
1.7%
—
#43
Maine · your comparison
1.7%
—
#44
Oklahoma
1.6%
—
#45
Iowa
1.5%
—
#46
New Hampshire
1.4%
—
#47
Washington
1.3%
—
#48
California
1.3%
—
#49
Oregon
1.2%
—
#50
Massachusetts
0.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.
Maine · 2024$57,480
Maine rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.
Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maine
2024 · Maine: $57,480 · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maine Real personal income per person history
Period
Maine
Compare
2014
$45,839
2015
$46,105
2016
$46,395
2017
$47,164
2018
$47,996
2019
$50,601
2020
$53,173
2021
$56,096
2022
$52,743
2023
$55,480
2024
$57,480
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · $57,4802024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Wyoming
$75,501
—
#2
Connecticut
$74,254
—
#3
Massachusetts
$71,629
—
#4
South Dakota
$69,153
—
#5
Nebraska
$65,297
—
#6
North Dakota
$65,271
—
#7
Colorado
$65,223
—
#8
New Hampshire
$64,632
—
#9
Washington
$64,421
—
#10
New York
$64,153
—
#11
New Jersey
$63,142
—
#12
California
$63,028
—
#13
Minnesota
$62,039
—
#14
Virginia
$61,914
—
#15
Maryland
$61,111
—
#16
Illinois
$60,333
—
#17
Alaska
$60,272
—
#18
Iowa
$60,144
—
#19
Montana
$59,203
—
#20
Kansas
$59,172
—
#21
Vermont
$58,893
—
#22
Oklahoma
$58,692
—
#23
Pennsylvania
$58,620
—
#24
Tennessee
$58,582
—
#25
Wisconsin
$58,273
—
#26
Texas
$58,219
—
#27
Missouri
$57,850
—
#28
Maine · your comparison
$57,480
—
#29
Florida
$57,131
—
#30
Louisiana
$56,789
—
#31
Nevada
$56,503
—
#32
North Carolina
$56,310
—
#33
Ohio
$56,232
—
#34
Rhode Island
$55,878
—
#35
Indiana
$55,562
—
#36
Oregon
$55,451
—
#37
Arkansas
$55,219
—
#38
Delaware
$55,185
—
#39
Utah
$55,116
—
#40
Michigan
$53,569
—
#41
Georgia
$52,952
—
#42
Arizona
$52,890
—
#43
Idaho
$52,816
—
#44
South Carolina
$52,463
—
#45
Kentucky
$52,290
—
#46
Hawaii
$52,272
—
#47
Alabama
$52,216
—
#48
New Mexico
$51,121
—
#49
West Virginia
$50,051
—
#50
Mississippi
$48,465
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
3 of 3 reviewed Maine actions · newest first
Apr 3, 2026 · LD 2203 · An Act to Limit Rates Charged to Low-income Electricity Consumers · SignedGovernor · LD 2203
An Act to Limit Rates Charged to Low-income Electricity Consumers
Apr 3, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Janet T. Mills · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Janet Mills signed LD 2203. LD 2203 bars competitive electricity providers from charging customers receiving low-income assistance a generation-service rate above the standard-offer rate that would otherwise apply. It authorizes commission rules, including sharing customer-assistance information between utilities and providers. The cap is limited to the covered customers and generation service. Melanie Sachs reported this committee bill; that role is not individual sponsorship.
Law chapter 640, approved 2026-04-03. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across sectors. Limits on competitive-provider rates for customers receiving low-income assistance concern a narrow price component, not all customers or a demonstrated statewide price reduction. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. 35-A MRSA §3203, sub-§4-D is enacted to read: 4-D. Low-income assistance program; rate limitation. A competitive electricity provider may not provide to a customer receiving low-income assistance authorized by section 3214, subsection 2 generation service at a rate that is greater than the standard-offer service rate established under section 3212 that would otherwise be applicable to that customer. The commission may adopt rules to implement this subsection, including, but not limited to, rules governing the sharing of low-income assistance customer data by a transmission and distribution utility with a competitive electricity provider. Rules adopted under this subsection are routine technical rules as defined in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2‑A.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 3, 2026 · LD 2203 · An Act to Limit Rates Charged to Low-income Electricity Consumers · Enacted · Chapter 640Maine Legislature · LD 2203
An Act to Limit Rates Charged to Low-income Electricity Consumers
Apr 3, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 640
Rep. Melanie Sachs · Reported for committee
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 2203 bars competitive electricity providers from charging customers receiving low-income assistance a generation-service rate above the standard-offer rate that would otherwise apply. It authorizes commission rules, including sharing customer-assistance information between utilities and providers. The cap is limited to the covered customers and generation service. Melanie Sachs reported this committee bill; that role is not individual sponsorship.
Law chapter 640, approved 2026-04-03. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across sectors. Limits on competitive-provider rates for customers receiving low-income assistance concern a narrow price component, not all customers or a demonstrated statewide price reduction. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. 35-A MRSA §3203, sub-§4-D is enacted to read: 4-D. Low-income assistance program; rate limitation. A competitive electricity provider may not provide to a customer receiving low-income assistance authorized by section 3214, subsection 2 generation service at a rate that is greater than the standard-offer service rate established under section 3212 that would otherwise be applicable to that customer. The commission may adopt rules to implement this subsection, including, but not limited to, rules governing the sharing of low-income assistance customer data by a transmission and distribution utility with a competitive electricity provider. Rules adopted under this subsection are routine technical rules as defined in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2‑A.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 2, 2023 · LD 1093 · An Act to Create a Seasonal Gas Tax Exemption and Rate · Not enactedMaine Legislature · LD 1093
An Act to Create a Seasonal Gas Tax Exemption and Rate
May 2, 2023 · Not enacted
Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham · Sponsored / Rep. William Pluecker · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tracy Quint · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 1093 proposed exempting covered motor fuel from Maine excise tax annually from Thanksgiving Day until May 1 and imposing a 40-cent-per-gallon rate during the rest of the year. Jet and turbojet fuel would retain a 3.4-cent rate. The proposal received an ought-not-to-pass disposition on May 2, 2023 and did not become law. It establishes neither a tax holiday nor savings at the pump, and Maine is only part of the New England price region.
Ought Not to Pass Pursuant To Joint Rule 310, May 2, 2023 The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact is a New England regional regular-gasoline price proxy, not a Maine-only price. Maine fuel-tax changes concern one component in one of the region’s six states, without establishing a regional price change or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: 2 Sec. 1. 36 MRSA §2903, sub-§1, as amended by PL 2019, c. 379, Pt. B, §7, is 3 repealed and the following enacted in its place: 4 1. Excise tax imposed. Any fuel containing at least 10% internal combustion engine 5 fuel is subject to the tax imposed by this section. 6 A. An excise tax is imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this 7 State, including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, at the rate of 8 40.0¢ per gallon. 9 B. Notwithstanding paragraph A and except as provided in paragraph C, an excise tax 10 may not be imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this State, 11 including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, from 12:00 a.m. on 12 Thanksgiving Day until the following 12:00 a.m. on May 1st. 13 C. An excise tax is imposed at a rate of 3.4¢ per gallon on internal combustion engine 14 fuel bought or used for the purpose of propelling jet or turbojet engine aircraft.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Maine officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Maine candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
14 statements from 6 candidates
2026 Maine Governor — General Election
3 candidates with matching statements · 10 statements
Clean Technology and Energy: Maine’s clean energy economy is already the fastest growing in New England. Hannah will reinvigorate Maine’s leadership in next-generation clean tech, investing in technologies that can lower energy costs and grow new jobs and the institutions and businesses driving adop…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and communications
Candidate campaign source
Clean Technology and Energy: Maine’s clean energy economy is already the fastest growing in New England. Hannah will reinvigorate Maine’s leadership in next-generation clean tech, investing in technologies that can lower energy costs and grow new jobs and the institutions and businesses driving adoption of these technologies.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Provide consistent funding for affordable housing: Invest $100 million per year investment in housing development, first-time homebuyer programs, and redevelopment to create more housing Mainers can afford. Take common sense approaches to increase housing supply: Accelerate permit approvals, cut red…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living
Candidate campaign source
Provide consistent funding for affordable housing: Invest $100 million per year investment in housing development, first-time homebuyer programs, and redevelopment to create more housing Mainers can afford. Take common sense approaches to increase housing supply: Accelerate permit approvals, cut red tape, and reduce barriers to new housing by streamlining and simplifying state and local permit approvals and support land use reforms that allow homes to be built faster, smarter, and more predictably. Take on Private Equity and Corporate Greed: Stop out-of-state corporations from displacing families from existing homes and driving up rents. From mobile home parks to apartments, we urgently need to protect the homes that are affordable now. Read Hannah’s full Housing Affordability Plan here.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Hannah Pingree believes there’s more to be done for Maine people. As Governor, she will take immediate, practical steps to lower costs for Maine people. That means tackling housing and energy bills, making health care and childcare accessible, and restructuring Maine’s tax system so the wealthiest p…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living
Candidate campaign source
Hannah Pingree believes there’s more to be done for Maine people. As Governor, she will take immediate, practical steps to lower costs for Maine people. That means tackling housing and energy bills, making health care and childcare accessible, and restructuring Maine’s tax system so the wealthiest pay their fair share and working families can afford their property taxes.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Hannah’s economic agenda is built on a simple and optimistic vision: every child in Maine should have a fair shot at a good life, and every worker should be able to earn wages that actually keep up with the cost of living—no matter where they live. That means building an economy that works for every…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
Hannah’s economic agenda is built on a simple and optimistic vision: every child in Maine should have a fair shot at a good life, and every worker should be able to earn wages that actually keep up with the cost of living—no matter where they live. That means building an economy that works for everyone—not just the wealthiest or most powerful. An economy that grows good-paying jobs worth staying for, lifts wages, strengthens Maine’s competitive edge, and gives every community the tools to shape its own future.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Hold the System Accountable: Maine can do more to reduce price gouging, profit skimming, and unnecessary complexity and barriers to coverage and care. Hannah’s plan will: Crack down on corporate and private equity buy-outs of health facilities that lead to loss of critical services, gaps in underser…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement
Candidate campaign source
Hold the System Accountable: Maine can do more to reduce price gouging, profit skimming, and unnecessary complexity and barriers to coverage and care. Hannah’s plan will: Crack down on corporate and private equity buy-outs of health facilities that lead to loss of critical services, gaps in underserved areas, and higher prices; Demand more from health insurers, health systems, and corporations that receive Maine taxpayer dollars or tax breaks, including strong efforts to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in the system; Make prescription drugs more affordable for Maine families by lowering out of pocket costs and protecting patients from unfair and unpredictable price increases. Reduce drug costs by expanding bulk and multi-state purchasing agreements, increasing transparency around drug pricing and rebates, and pursue state-level authority to limit excessive price hikes on essential medications. Leverage the negotiating power of state government, Maine’s largest employer, to reduce prescription drug prices for State workers by capping prices based on Medicare negotiation and other rates and support other large employers to do the same; Reduce paperwork and place limits on prior authorization that put distance between patients and their doctors and waste time and money for both; and Improve the process to enroll in MaineCare and CoverME.gov to maintain the gains Maine has made in getting people covered.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
#2. Lower energy costs for manufacturers and Maine’s heritage industries Too many businesses are being priced out of Maine because of the high cost of energy. As Governor, I will pursue negotiated industrial rate contracts tied to job creation and investment so Maine employers can stay competitive w…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Lowering Energy Costs
Candidate campaign source
#2. Lower energy costs for manufacturers and Maine’s heritage industries Too many businesses are being priced out of Maine because of the high cost of energy. As Governor, I will pursue negotiated industrial rate contracts tied to job creation and investment so Maine employers can stay competitive without shifting costs onto families and small businesses.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Too many Maine homes are leaky and not efficient. During our winters we feel it the most. The best way to save energy costs is to not use as much in the first place. As Governor, I will scale weatherization and energy-efficiency investments statewide so we can cut waste and lower monthly bills and m…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Lowering Energy Costs
Candidate campaign source
Too many Maine homes are leaky and not efficient. During our winters we feel it the most. The best way to save energy costs is to not use as much in the first place. As Governor, I will scale weatherization and energy-efficiency investments statewide so we can cut waste and lower monthly bills and make your home more comfortable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
In addition to lowering our cost-of-living, achieving energy independence will strengthen American’s position across the globe. Our European allies will not be held hostage by countries who are not our friends such as Russia. Also, we must stop importing oil from countries that seek to do America ha…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy and the Economy
Candidate campaign source
In addition to lowering our cost-of-living, achieving energy independence will strengthen American’s position across the globe. Our European allies will not be held hostage by countries who are not our friends such as Russia. Also, we must stop importing oil from countries that seek to do America harm, such as Iran.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Prices are rising fast, and thanks to the tariffs and the War in Iran, they’re not coming down. The Trump Tariffs are hitting families hard, and the uncertainty that follows is forcing people to change their plans. They’re not purchasing new vehicles or expanding businesses. Trump’s tariffs are even…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living
Candidate campaign source
Prices are rising fast, and thanks to the tariffs and the War in Iran, they’re not coming down. The Trump Tariffs are hitting families hard, and the uncertainty that follows is forcing people to change their plans. They’re not purchasing new vehicles or expanding businesses. Trump’s tariffs are even changing how folks shop for groceries and making heating your own home unaffordable. And the War in Iran has kept gas prices sky high all year long. In Congress, I’ll fight for universal childcare, good-paying jobs, and a surge in affordable housing to help our neighbors manage a middle-class life again. And I’ll fight to lift Trump’s blanket tariffs and end his war of choice so families can afford to live in Maine.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Paul knows what it is like to struggle. He understands high costs are hitting family and senior citizen budgets hard. He will work to eliminate wasteful spending which drove up inflation under Biden.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering Costs and Inflation
Candidate campaign source
Paul knows what it is like to struggle. He understands high costs are hitting family and senior citizen budgets hard. He will work to eliminate wasteful spending which drove up inflation under Biden.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Lowering Costs and InflationPaul knows what it is like to struggle. He understands high costs are hitting family and senior citizen budgets hard. He will work to eliminate wasteful spending which drove up inflation under Biden.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, workers, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
Lowering Costs and InflationPaul knows what it is like to struggle. He understands high costs are hitting family and senior citizen budgets hard. He will work to eliminate wasteful spending which drove up inflation under Biden.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Maine candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Maine incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Maine legislators and Maine’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Maine’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Maine incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham
Maine House of Representatives, District 12 · R–ME
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Billy Bob FaulkinghamMaine Legislature · LD 1093
An Act to Create a Seasonal Gas Tax Exemption and Rate
May 2, 2023 · Not enacted
Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham · Sponsored / Rep. William Pluecker · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tracy Quint · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 1093 proposed exempting covered motor fuel from Maine excise tax annually from Thanksgiving Day until May 1 and imposing a 40-cent-per-gallon rate during the rest of the year. Jet and turbojet fuel would retain a 3.4-cent rate. The proposal received an ought-not-to-pass disposition on May 2, 2023 and did not become law. It establishes neither a tax holiday nor savings at the pump, and Maine is only part of the New England price region.
Ought Not to Pass Pursuant To Joint Rule 310, May 2, 2023 The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact is a New England regional regular-gasoline price proxy, not a Maine-only price. Maine fuel-tax changes concern one component in one of the region’s six states, without establishing a regional price change or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: 2 Sec. 1. 36 MRSA §2903, sub-§1, as amended by PL 2019, c. 379, Pt. B, §7, is 3 repealed and the following enacted in its place: 4 1. Excise tax imposed. Any fuel containing at least 10% internal combustion engine 5 fuel is subject to the tax imposed by this section. 6 A. An excise tax is imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this 7 State, including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, at the rate of 8 40.0¢ per gallon. 9 B. Notwithstanding paragraph A and except as provided in paragraph C, an excise tax 10 may not be imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this State, 11 including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, from 12:00 a.m. on 12 Thanksgiving Day until the following 12:00 a.m. on May 1st. 13 C. An excise tax is imposed at a rate of 3.4¢ per gallon on internal combustion engine 14 fuel bought or used for the purpose of propelling jet or turbojet engine aircraft.
Only current Maine officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Maine statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Maine snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Maine, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.