Louisiana · individual fact

Louisiana budget, debt, and interest

Louisiana state-government finances, comparable debt and interest figures, and the enacted budget.

The national companion measures federal finances. Here the unit is Louisiana state government. Federal debt is not allocated to Louisiana; a state budget is not the federal budget.

State debt outstanding$16.09BFY2024 · #19 of 50 · highest first
Interest expenditure$461.47MFY2024 · #23 of 50 · highest first
Total state tax collections$16.45BFY2024 · #28 of 50 · highest first

Louisiana over time

Explore Louisiana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Louisiana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Louisiana effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Louisiana change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

No comparable time series is retained for this topic. The chart shows events and reviewed actions; current state comparisons appear below.

Louisiana government actions Louisiana · source units

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Events and reviewed actionsNo saved observations in this range.Sep 1, 2005Jun 30, 2026
✦ Major events & context · 50National context · Hurricane Katrina emergency appropriations · 2005-09-08Katrina relief fundingNational context · Medicare prescription drug benefit begins · 2006-01-01Medicare Part D beginsNational context · Iraq and Afghanistan war funding assessment · 2007-07-31War funding assessmentNational context · Economic Stimulus Act tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 tax rebatesNational context · Treasury support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac · 2008-09-07Fannie / Freddie supportNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Emergency stabilization law creates TARP · 2008-10-03TARP stabilizationNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Affordable Care Act changes health financing · 2010-03-23Health-care financing lawNational context · Tax extensions and payroll-tax relief · 2010-12-172010 tax / benefit dealNational context · Budget Control Act and debt-limit agreement · 2011-08-022011 budget agreementNational context · S&P lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2011-08-05S&P rating downgradeNational context · Fiscal-cliff tax agreement · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff agreementNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · Shutdown ends and debt limit is suspended · 2013-10-172013 funding / debt dealNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 · 2013-12-262013 budget caps dealNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 · 2015-11-022015 budget / debt dealNational context · Fed begins lifting rates after the crisis · 2015-12-16Fed rate normalizationNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 · 2018-02-092018 budget / debt dealNational context · 2018–19 partial government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 funding lapseNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 · 2019-08-022019 budget / debt dealNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and Treasury purchases · 2020-03-15Fed pandemic responseNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · Further pandemic relief and annual funding · 2020-12-27December pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure fundingNational context · Congress raises the debt limit after two impasses · 2021-12-162021 debt-limit increaseNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor funding and investment credits · 2022-08-09CHIPS fundingNational context · PACT Act expands veterans’ benefits · 2022-08-10Veterans’ benefits expansionNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes taxes and spending · 2022-08-16Energy / health / tax lawNational context · Student-loan cancellation cost recorded · 2022-09-30Loan-cost accountingNational context · Inflation and rates raise interest costs above forecasts · 2023-01-09Inflation / interest costsNational context · Fed reports suspension of Treasury payments · 2023-01-13Fed payments suspendedNational context · Disaster tax deadlines move into the next fiscal year · 2023-02-24Disaster tax deferralsNational context · Fiscal Responsibility Act · 2023-06-032023 debt-limit agreementNational context · Fitch lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2023-08-01Fitch rating downgradeNational context · Student-loan cost reversal lowers recorded outlays · 2023-08-31Loan-cost reversalNational context · National security supplemental funding · 2024-04-24Security supplementalNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act becomes law · 2025-01-05Social Security benefitsNational context · Treasury begins extraordinary measures · 2025-01-21Debt-limit measuresNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02Tariffs / customs receiptsNational context · Moody’s lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2025-05-16Moody’s rating downgradeNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 federal government shutdown · 2025-10-012025 funding lapseNational context · Supreme Court rejects IEEPA tariff authority · 2026-02-20Tariff authority ruling● Louisiana Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · 22◆ Governor · 2■ Louisiana agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-06-30

6 of 6 reviewed Louisiana actions match · 5 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.

How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Louisiana · state comparison

State debt and interest

Compare state-government balances and interest expenditure from the same Census fiscal-year survey.

Louisiana · FY2024$16.09B
Louisiana rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.1TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

State debt outstanding

Long-term debt outstanding plus short-term debt outstanding at fiscal year end.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Excludes local-government debt. Dollar ranks describe scale, not credit quality.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $728.59MHigher value · $166.39BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · $16.09BFY2024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
State debt outstanding · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$166.39B—
#2New York$120.59B—
#3Texas$70.05B—
#4Massachusetts$65.87B—
#5New Jersey$57.23B—
#6Pennsylvania$48.67B—
#7Illinois$43.38B—
#8Virginia$33.73B—
#9Connecticut$33.27B—
#10Ohio$32.29B—
#11Washington$30.62B—
#12Maryland$25.9B—
#13Michigan$25.02B—
#14Colorado$23.57B—
#15Wisconsin$22.79B—
#16Florida$20.14B—
#17Minnesota$17.03B—
#18Oregon$16.91B—
#19Louisiana · your comparison$16.09B—
#20South Carolina$15.36B—
#21West Virginia$15.08B—
#22Georgia$14.05B—
#23North Carolina$13.13B—
#24Hawaii$11.72B—
#25Rhode Island$11.41B—
#26Alabama$10.99B—
#27Oklahoma$10.15B—
#28Kentucky$10.08B—
#29Tennessee$9.03B—
#30Indiana$8.52B—
#31Iowa$8.06B—
#32Arkansas$8.05B—
#33Mississippi$7.72B—
#34New Hampshire$7.58B—
#35Kansas$7.16B—
#36New Mexico$7.12B—
#37Missouri$6.99B—
#38Arizona$6.88B—
#39Alaska$5.72B—
#40Utah$5.55B—
#41Maine$5.3B—
#42North Dakota$4.89B—
#43South Dakota$4.67B—
#44Delaware$3.69B—
#45Nebraska$3.39B—
#46Nevada$2.89B—
#47Montana$2.76B—
#48Vermont$2.67B—
#49Wyoming$1.26B—
#50Idaho$728.59M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Louisiana · state comparison

Where state revenue comes from

All measures use Census state-government records for FY2024. Categories describe collections; they do not rank statutory tax rates.

Louisiana · FY2024$4.87B
Louisiana rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$465.4BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

General sales-tax collections

Census category T09.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $54.35BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · $4.87BFY2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
General sales-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas$54.35B—
#2California$53.33B—
#3Florida$40.09B—
#4Washington$22.81B—
#5New York$19.99B—
#6Ohio$16.33B—
#7Illinois$16.05B—
#8Pennsylvania$15.6B—
#9New Jersey$14.31B—
#10Tennessee$14.08B—
#11Arizona$13.16B—
#12Michigan$12.7B—
#13North Carolina$12.16B—
#14Indiana$10.96B—
#15Massachusetts$9.4B—
#16Georgia$9.01B—
#17Minnesota$8.49B—
#18Nevada$8.4B—
#19Wisconsin$7.59B—
#20Virginia$7.4B—
#21Maryland$6.85B—
#22South Carolina$6.44B—
#23Connecticut$6.23B—
#24Kentucky$5.8B—
#25Missouri$5.26B—
#26Mississippi$5.07B—
#27Arkansas$5.07B—
#28Louisiana · your comparison$4.87B—
#29Hawaii$4.79B—
#30Colorado$4.67B—
#31Iowa$4.64B—
#32Utah$4.63B—
#33Alabama$4.59B—
#34Kansas$4.33B—
#35New Mexico$4.33B—
#36Oklahoma$3.81B—
#37Idaho$3.09B—
#38Nebraska$2.97B—
#39Maine$2.35B—
#40West Virginia$1.82B—
#41South Dakota$1.68B—
#42Rhode Island$1.63B—
#43Oregon$1.34B—
#44North Dakota$1.32B—
#45Wyoming$1.01B—
#46Vermont$597.33M—
#47Alaska$0—
#47Delaware$0—
#47Montana$0—
#47New Hampshire$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Louisiana · state comparison

Where state operating spending goes

Census categories allow consistent comparisons. These selected categories are not a breakdown of the current Louisiana appropriations act.

Louisiana · FY2024$18.69B
Louisiana rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.02TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public welfare current operations

Current operations for public welfare institutions and other public welfare, excluding capital and transfers.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $1.09BHigher value · $156.71BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · $18.69BFY2024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Public welfare current operations · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$156.71B—
#2New York$97.35B—
#3Texas$57.32B—
#4Illinois$41.13B—
#5Florida$40.11B—
#6Ohio$39.77B—
#7Pennsylvania$39.34B—
#8Massachusetts$34.12B—
#9North Carolina$30.64B—
#10New Jersey$28.06B—
#11Arizona$26.02B—
#12Michigan$24.37B—
#13Virginia$23.68B—
#14Minnesota$23.37B—
#15Indiana$22.93B—
#16Maryland$21.61B—
#17Kentucky$20.54B—
#18Oregon$20.47B—
#19Washington$19.6B—
#20Georgia$18.99B—
#21Louisiana · your comparison$18.69B—
#22Tennessee$16.42B—
#23Wisconsin$16.26B—
#24Missouri$15.65B—
#25Oklahoma$14.57B—
#26Colorado$13.6B—
#27South Carolina$12.84B—
#28New Mexico$10.72B—
#29Iowa$10.26B—
#30Alabama$9.73B—
#31Arkansas$8.67B—
#32Mississippi$8.08B—
#33Utah$6.91B—
#34Kansas$6.84B—
#35Nevada$6.62B—
#36West Virginia$6.24B—
#37Maine$5.7B—
#38Nebraska$4.97B—
#39Connecticut$4.88B—
#40Rhode Island$4.54B—
#41Hawaii$4.14B—
#42Delaware$3.97B—
#43Idaho$3.73B—
#44Alaska$3.27B—
#45Montana$2.89B—
#46New Hampshire$2.72B—
#47Vermont$2.69B—
#48North Dakota$2.09B—
#49South Dakota$1.95B—
#50Wyoming$1.09B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Louisiana · state comparison

State operating costs and the enacted budget

The enacted plan, spending categories and audited activity use different periods and accounting scopes; they are kept separate.

Louisiana · FY2024$31.67B
Louisiana rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$2.04TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current operation expenditure

Sum of Census current-operation expenditure categories, excluding capital outlay, interest, and assistance/subsidy expenditure.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. This FY2024 comparison differs in scope and period from Louisiana’s FY2027 appropriations and Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 audit shown below.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Louisiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Louisiana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.01BHigher value · $287.03BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Louisiana · $31.67BFY2024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Louisiana with every state · 50 ranked
Current operation expenditure · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$287.03B—
#2New York$161.37B—
#3Texas$136.18B—
#4Florida$86.61B—
#5Pennsylvania$77.15B—
#6Illinois$75.67B—
#7Ohio$66.77B—
#8New Jersey$64.53B—
#9Massachusetts$61.38B—
#10North Carolina$59.01B—
#11Michigan$57.27B—
#12Virginia$53.45B—
#13Washington$49.82B—
#14Georgia$45.19B—
#15Maryland$45.06B—
#16Oregon$41.41B—
#17Arizona$38.71B—
#18Minnesota$38.1B—
#19Indiana$37.4B—
#20Kentucky$36.94B—
#21Wisconsin$34.5B—
#22Missouri$34.43B—
#23South Carolina$32.85B—
#24Colorado$32.73B—
#25Louisiana · your comparison$31.67B—
#26Tennessee$31.12B—
#27Alabama$26.99B—
#28Oklahoma$24.28B—
#29Utah$22.7B—
#30New Mexico$21.94B—
#31Connecticut$21.22B—
#32Iowa$19.89B—
#33Kansas$18.39B—
#34Hawaii$16.62B—
#35Mississippi$16.46B—
#36Arkansas$16.28B—
#37West Virginia$13.19B—
#38Nevada$12.43B—
#39Nebraska$10.41B—
#40Maine$10.12B—
#41Delaware$9.24B—
#42Rhode Island$8.93B—
#43Alaska$8.4B—
#44Idaho$8.21B—
#45New Hampshire$7.12B—
#46Montana$6.44B—
#47Vermont$6.28B—
#48North Dakota$5.63B—
#49South Dakota$4.55B—
#50Wyoming$4.01B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

FY2027 · 2026 Regular Session enacted appropriations

Enacted appropriations

$53.4B

Total appropriations for State government reported in the Louisiana House's post-session summary, including the executive branch, legislature, judiciary, ancillary agencies, and capital outlay. FactVote reconstructed $53.4228 billion by summing the summary's eight service categories, each of which is published to the nearest $0.1 million; it is therefore a rounded presentation total, not a dollar-exact appropriation ledger.

Where State tax revenue comes from

FY2025 ACFR actual

Shares of the $14.422 billion in taxes reported as general revenue for Louisiana's primary government. Gaming revenue is excluded because the ACFR reports it separately from taxes, and parish and municipal taxes retained locally are outside this denominator.

Sales and use taxes
$5.4B · 37.7%
Individual income taxes
$4.9B · 33.7%
Insurance premium taxes
$1.3B · 9.3%
Corporate income taxes
$845.9M · 5.9%
Gas and fuels taxes
$598.6M · 4.2%
Franchise taxes
$570.0M · 4%
Severance taxes
$343.5M · 2.4%
Tobacco taxes
$227.5M · 1.6%
Occupancy taxes
$83.2M · 0.6%
Alcohol taxes
$73.4M · 0.5%
Other taxes
$50.0M · 0.3%

FY2027 appropriations by service area

FY2027 enacted plan

The eight categories and rounded amounts published by Louisiana House Legislative Services after completion of the 2026 Regular Session. Together they reconstruct the reported $53.4 billion total without reclassifying agencies or programs.

Health care
$23.5B · 44%
General government
$12.8B · 23.9%
K–12 education
$6.4B · 12.1%
Higher education
$3.7B · 6.9%
Debt service and other obligations
$3.7B · 6.9%
Public safety and corrections
$2.2B · 4.1%
Children and family services
$792.8M · 1.5%
Legislative and judicial
$362.9M · 0.7%

Audited government-wide results

Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025
Revenue
$45.9B
Expenses
$43.2B

Government-wide activity for Louisiana's primary government on the accrual basis. Revenue combines charges for services, operating and capital grants, taxes, gaming, use of money and property, and other general revenue; transfers cancel at the primary-government level.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt from FactVote’s Louisiana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

12 statements from 8 candidates

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 1 — Open Primary

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Lauren Jewett

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · LA

Budgets, spending & debt

Oppose any expansion of ICE’s authority or budget until the agency is fully dissolved

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy

Candidate campaign source

Oppose any expansion of ICE’s authority or budget until the agency is fully dissolved

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lauren Jewett — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗

Steve Scalise

3 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · LA

Budgets, spending & debt

Apply fiscal discipline to federal spending and budgeting.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fiscal Policy

Candidate campaign source

Apply fiscal discipline to federal spending and budgeting.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steve Scalise — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Steve Scalise
Budgets, spending & debt

A proven conservative, Steve believes in upholding the Constitution. He has always exercised fiscal discipline, pushed for lower taxes, and believed in balancing our nation’s checkbook. He is committed to fighting for secure borders and working to undo the Biden administration’s pro-amnesty policies…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: CONSERVATIVE VALUES

Candidate campaign source

A proven conservative, Steve believes in upholding the Constitution. He has always exercised fiscal discipline, pushed for lower taxes, and believed in balancing our nation’s checkbook. He is committed to fighting for secure borders and working to undo the Biden administration’s pro-amnesty policies that put the safety of our nation’s communities in jeopardy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steve Scalise — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Budgets, spending & debt

Balance the federal government's budget.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Federal Budget

Candidate campaign source

Balance the federal government's budget.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steve Scalise — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 4 — Open Primary

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Conrad Cable

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · LA

Budgets, spending & debt

Guarantee School Meals for Every Child For thousands of kids in District 4, school meals are their main meals. When families lose SNAP, children often lose eligibility for school meals too.We already know how to fix this. During the pandemic, we provided free meals to every student, and it worked. W…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Guarantee School Meals for Every Child For thousands of kids in District 4, school meals are their main meals. When families lose SNAP, children often lose eligibility for school meals too.We already know how to fix this. During the pandemic, we provided free meals to every student, and it worked. When that program ended, millions of children were put aside again.Hunger doesn’t just hurt kids’ health, it makes it harder for them to learn. No child in America should go hungry at school. We must guarantee breakfast and lunch for every child, every day.Source: Center on Budget & Policy Priorities

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Conrad Cable — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Louisiana U.S. House District 5 — Open Primary

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Michael Echols

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 5 · LA

Budgets, spending & debt

Making groceries affordable again starts with tackling the policies that caused food prices to skyrocket in the first place. Runaway federal spending drove inflation, raising the cost of everything from fertilizer and fuel to transportation and packaging. We need to rein in Washington’s reckless spe…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Making groceries affordable again starts with tackling the policies that caused food prices to skyrocket in the first place. Runaway federal spending drove inflation, raising the cost of everything from fertilizer and fuel to transportation and packaging. We need to rein in Washington’s reckless spending, expand American energy production to lower fuel costs, and remove unnecessary regulations that drive up costs for farmers, truckers, and grocery stores. When we lower the cost of producing and transporting food, prices at the checkout line come down for families. Washington can’t control every price in the economy, but it can stop making groceries more expensive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael Echols — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt terms in retained, attributed source text from published Louisiana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Louisiana incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Louisiana legislators and Louisiana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Louisiana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Louisiana incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. John Kennedy

U.S. Senate, Louisiana · R–LA

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. John Kennedy
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 3066

Pay the People Act

Oct 28, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. John Kennedy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would provide appropriations for specified federal employees, active-duty service members, and covered contractor employees during funding lapses. It concerns continuity of compensation for covered groups and does not prove this bill became law.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2. Appropriations (a) Definitions In this section— (1) the term agency means each authority of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States; and (2) the term covered individual— (A) means an employee of an agency; and (B) includes— (i) a contractor who provides support to an employee described in subparagraph (A); and (ii) a member of the Armed Forces on active duty. (b) Appropriations For fiscal year 2026, and any fiscal year thereafter, for any period during which interim continuing appropriations or full-year appropriations for that fiscal year are not in effect for an agency, there are appropriated to the head of the agency, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as are necessary to provide standard rates of pay, allowances, pay differentials, benefits, and other payments otherwise payable on a regular basis to covered individuals with respect to the agency. (c) Termination Appropriations and funds made available and authority granted under subsection (b) shall be available to the head of an agency until whichever of the following first occurs: (1) The enactment into law of appropriations for the agency until the end of the applicable fiscal year (including a continuing appropriation) that provide amounts for the purposes for which amounts are made available under subsection (b). (2) The enactment into law of appropriations for the agency until the end of the applicable fiscal year (including a continuing appropriation) without any appropriation for such purposes. (d) Interim continuing appropriations Appropriations made available under subsection (b) may not be obligated by the head of an agency during any period during which continuing appropriations for the purposes for which amounts are made available under subsection (b) are in effect for the agency. (e) Charging to full-Year appropriations Obligations or expenditures made by the head of an agency pursuant to subsection (b) shall be charged to the applicable appropriation for the agency whenever a regular appropriation bill or a measure making continuing appropriations until the end of the applicable fiscal year for the agency becomes law. (f) Retroactive effective date This Act shall take effect as if enacted on September 30, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Louisiana delegation · S 3060

Paychecks for Patriots Act of 2025

Oct 28, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. John Kennedy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would provide military pay appropriations during a lapse in federal funding in fiscal year 2026. It concerns continuity of household wage income for covered service members, not the statewide median.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2. Continuing appropriations for members of the Armed Forces There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 2026, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for any period during which interim or full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2026 are not in effect, such sums as are necessary to provide pay and allowances to members of the Armed Forces, including reserve components thereof, who perform active service or inactive duty training during such period. 3. Termination Appropriations and funds made available and authority granted pursuant to this Act shall be available until the enactment into law of an appropriation (including a continuing appropriation) for any purpose for which amounts are made available in section 2.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Samuel Jenkins

Louisiana Senate, District 39 · D–LA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Samuel Jenkins
Louisiana Legislature · SB 157

SCHOOLS: Provides for paid parental leave for eligible employees. (gov sig) (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Jun 2, 2026 · Enacted

Sen. Samuel Jenkins · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law provides eligible school employees with six weeks (240 hours) of parental leave at 100 percent of base pay for qualifying birth, pregnancy-loss, adoption, or foster-placement events, with prorated part-time pay. It requires twelve months of employment, use within twelve weeks of the event, and twelve months between leave periods. Implementation is subject to legislative appropriation of funds; required rules are due by November 1, 2026.

Current Status: Signed by the Governor - Act 744. Latest official history entry: Effective date 6/2/2026. (2026-06-02). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(3) "Eligible employee" means any individual identified in R.S. 17:43, 17:411, 17:441, 17:491, 17:1170, 17:1200, or 17:1205 who is classified as full or part time and has been employed for at least twelve months with a local education agency. (4) "LEA" means local education agency, which has the same definition as in R.S. 17:1942. (5) "Paid parental leave" means six weeks, or two hundred forty hours, of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible employee's base pay without deduction to an eligible employee's current or accrued annual, sick, or compensatory leave balances. (6) "Qualifying event" means: (a) Before and after the birth of a child, including but not limited to prenatal and postnatal appointments. (b) Pregnancy loss, including stillbirth. (c) Placement of a child with the employee for adoption, including but not limited to mandatory meetings related to adoption or preplacement and post-placement court proceedings. (d) Placement of a child with the employee for foster care, including but not limited to mandatory meetings related to foster placement or preplacement and post-placement court proceedings. (7) "Superintendent" means the superintendent of the Louisiana Department of Education. B.(1) Pursuant to this Section, every city, parish, and other local public school board shall: (a) Grant paid parental leave to an eligible employee who experiences a qualifying event, and as of the date of the qualifying event has been employed by the LEA for at least twelve months. (b) Allow the position to be filled by the appointment of substitute teachers when it has been temporarily vacated by a teacher who has been granted paid parental leave, or by a teacher transferred to the position when it has been temporarily vacated by a teacher taking a maternity, foster, or adoptive leave pursuant to this Section. A substitute teacher appointed pursuant to this Subparagraph shall not acquire any tenure rights or privileges, unless the substitute teacher has subsequently been appointed to fill a regular vacancy and has the necessary qualifications. (c) Restore an eligible employee to the same position and same assignment at the same school held before the taking of paid parental leave upon return from such leave. (d) Allow an eligible employee to use paid parental leave continuously or intermittently, provided that the paid parental leave is used within twelve weeks of the qualifying event. (e) Prohibit an eligible employee who takes fewer than six weeks, or two hundred forty hours, of paid parental leave reserving his remaining weeks of paid parental leave for a subsequently occurring qualifying event. (f) Compensate a full-time employee at the rate of one hundred percent of the employee's base pay pursuant to the salary schedule provided in R.S. 17:418 for a period not to exceed six weeks during the available leave period. (g) Compensate a part-time employee at the rate of one hundred percent of the employee's base pay for a period not to exceed six weeks, based upon a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours the employee normally works. (h) Prohibit the donation of paid parental leave to another employee or leave pool. (i) Allow both parents, if they are eligible employees, paid parental leave to be taken concurrently, consecutively, or at a different time as the other eligible employee. (j) Prohibit requiring the use of an eligible employee's sick, annual, or other accrued leave before taking paid parental leave. Paid parental leave shall run concurrently with leave requested under the Family and Medical Leave Act "FMLA". (k) At least twelve months must elapse from the beginning of one parental leave period before an employee is eligible for another parental leave period. For a new parental leave period, there must be a new qualifying event on or after the twelve month waiting period. […] Section 3. The rules and regulations necessary for the implementation of the provisions of this Act shall be adopted and promulgated by November 1, 2026. Section 4. The implementation of the provisions of this Act shall be subject to the appropriation of funds by the legislature for this purpose.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Valarie Hodges

Louisiana Senate, District 13 · R–LA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Valarie Hodges
Louisiana Legislature · SB 388

CRIME/PUNISHMENT: Creates the crime of unlawful entry or reentry into the state of Louisiana by an alien. (See Act) (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

Jun 18, 2024 · Enacted

Sen. Valarie Hodges · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The historical enactment creates state unlawful-entry and reentry offenses, with federal-status defenses and an exception for necessary witnesses to or victims of listed crimes. Those offenses take effect only under the act’s specified Supreme Court or constitutional-amendment contingencies. The separate border-security compact authority depends on specified Texas executive action and requires Louisiana legislative approval and funding for a negotiated compact. Enactment alone does not establish current operation or enforceability.

Current Status: Signed by the Governor - Act 670. Latest official history entry: Effective date: See Act. (2024-06-18). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Louisiana evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

§112.22. Unlawful entry or reentry into the state of Louisiana by an alien A. The crime of unlawful entry or unlawful reentry is committed when an alien enters or reenters into this state and is unlawfully present in this state. B.(1) Whoever commits the crime of unlawful entry or unlawful reentry into this state by an alien upon a first offense shall be imprisoned for not more than six months, fined not more than one thousand dollars, or both. (2) Whoever commits the crime of unlawful entry or unlawful reentry into this state by an alien upon a second or subsequent offense shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not less than one year nor more than two years, fined not more than ten thousand dollars, or both. C. It shall be an affirmative defense to a prosecution to the crime of unlawful entry or unlawful reentry into this state by an alien that either: (1) The defendant is lawfully present in this state because the federal government has granted the defendant lawful presence in the United States or asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1158. (2) The defendant's conduct does not constitute a violation of 8 U.S.C. Section 1325(a), relative to illegal entry into the United States. D. This Section shall not apply to an alien unlawfully present in the United States if he has been a necessary witness to or victim of a crime of domestic violence, rape, sexual exploitation, sexual assault, murder, manslaughter, assault, battery, human trafficking, kidnapping, false imprisonment, involuntary servitude, fraud in foreign labor contracting, blackmail, extortion, or witness tampering. […] D. The governor, with the legal assistance of the attorney general, is hereby authorized to negotiate and assist the state of Texas in an interstate compact for border security among interested states with the governor of the state of Texas in securing the southern border of the United States of America. E. Any interstate compact that may be developed and executed under the authority of this Section shall, in order to take effect, represent a voluntary association of sovereign states of this United States of America, with the understanding that any such interstate compact shall not in any way increase the political authority of the compacting states in relation to the federal government or in any other manner that violates the Constitution of the United States of America. F. The interstate compact authorized by this Section shall provide for joint action among the states that participate in the compact to pursue all security priorities, as follows: (1) Sharing of law enforcement intelligence on illegal activity occurring at or in proximity to the United States-Mexico border. (2) Sharing of state resources in order to build physical barriers, comprehensive technological surveillance systems, or combinations of barriers and surveillance systems on state property for the purposes of deterring and detecting illegal activity at or in proximity to the United States-Mexico border. (3) Sharing of other law enforcement resources to ensure the protection of personnel and property of citizens of the states participating in the compact. G. Once the governor, with the assistance of the attorney general, negotiates and assists the governor of the state of Texas with preparation and finalization of the compact to secure the United States-Mexico border, the governor shall promptly submit the Interstate Compact for Border Security to the legislature for approval and the appropriation of necessary funds to fulfill the purposes provided for in Subsection F of this Section. […] Section 4. The provisions of this Section and Section 1 shall take effect on and become effective immediately upon, and to the extent permitted, by the occurrence of any of the following circumstances: (A) Any decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of United States v. Texas, Docket No. 23A814, which affirms the Act which originated as Texas Senate Bill No. 4 of the 2023 88th Legislature Fourth Called Legislative Session of the Texas Legislature, which enacted Texas Penal Code Section 51.01 et seq, entitled "Illegal Entry Into the State", that recognizes the right of states to protect their citizens of their respective states when "actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit delay", pursuant to Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution of the United States of America. (B) Adoption of an amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America that, in whole or in part, restores or increases the authority of the state of Louisiana to prohibit or limit the unlawful entry or reentry by an alien without lawful presence in this state should the Supreme Court of the United States fail to affirm the provisions of Subsection A of this Section. Section 5. The provisions of this Section and Section 2 of this Act shall become effective upon any executive order or other such executive action by the governor of the state of Texas in furtherance of the Act which originated as Texas Senate Bill No. 1403 of the 2023 Regular Session of the 88th Texas Legislature, which enacted Texas Government Code Section 794 et seq, entitled "Interstate Compact for Border Security" which authorizes the governor of the state of Texas to develop and execute an interstate compact for border security for among interested states.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Louisiana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Louisiana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.