Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages6.8%2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 658.2%2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6565%2024 · #45 of 50 · highest first
Kentucky over time
Explore Kentucky readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kentucky officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kentucky effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kentucky change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages Kentucky · source units
KentuckyPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
24 of 24 reviewed Kentucky actions match · 20 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.
Kentucky · 2024: 6.8% · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Kentucky · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
Kentucky · 20246.8%
Kentucky rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2024 · Kentucky: 6.8% · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2014
8.5%
2015
6%
2016
5.1%
2017
5.4%
2018
5.6%
2019
6.4%
2020
Not available
2021
5.7%
2022
5.6%
2023
5.4%
2024
6.8%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 6.8%2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky · your comparison
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio
6.7%
—
#32
Washington
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Kentucky’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.
This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Kentucky with every state.
Kentucky · 2020$10,257
Kentucky rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2020 · Kentucky: $10,257 · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2014
$7,965
2015
$8,306
2016
$8,611
2017
$8,959
2018
$9,332
2019
$9,744
2020
$10,257
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · $10,2572020 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky · your comparison
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
Kentucky · 202273.6 years
Kentucky rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Kentucky population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2022 · Kentucky: 73.6 years · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Life expectancy at birth history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2018
75.3 years
2019
75.5 years
2020
73.5 years
2021
72.3 years
2022
73.6 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 73.6 years2022 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky · your comparison
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
Kentucky · 202213%
Kentucky rank#8among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark10.8%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kentucky
2022 · Kentucky: 13% · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.8% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kentucky Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
Kentucky
Compare
2019
11.8%
2020
11.6%
2021
12.5%
2022
13%
2023
Not available
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7%Higher value · 14.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 13%2022 · Rank #8 of 50, highest first95% confidence interval: 11.8% – 14.4%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
West Virginia
14.6%
95% CI: 13.6–15.7
#2
Arkansas
14.1%
95% CI: 13–15.3
#3
Mississippi
13.9%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#4
Alabama
13.6%
95% CI: 12.4–14.9
#5
Texas
13.4%
95% CI: 12.4–14.6
#6
Louisiana
13.3%
95% CI: 12.3–14.3
#7
Tennessee
13.1%
95% CI: 12.1–14.2
#8
Kentucky · your comparison
13%
95% CI: 11.8–14.4
#9
Oklahoma
12.2%
95% CI: 11.4–13.2
#10
Delaware
11.9%
95% CI: 10.7–13.3
#11
Arizona
11.4%
95% CI: 10.4–12.4
#11
Ohio
11.4%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#13
Indiana
11.3%
95% CI: 10.7–12
#13
Virginia
11.3%
95% CI: 10.6–12.2
#15
New Mexico
11.2%
95% CI: 10–12.4
#16
South Carolina
11.1%
95% CI: 10.3–11.9
#17
Georgia
11%
95% CI: 10.3–11.9
#18
Illinois
10.8%
95% CI: 9.7–11.9
#18
North Carolina
10.8%
95% CI: 9.7–12
#20
California
10.7%
95% CI: 9.8–11.6
#21
Maryland
10.6%
95% CI: 9.9–11.3
#22
Hawaii
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#23
Iowa
10.3%
95% CI: 9.6–11.1
#24
Kansas
10.2%
95% CI: 9.6–10.9
#24
Missouri
10.2%
95% CI: 9.4–11.1
#24
Rhode Island
10.2%
95% CI: 9.3–11.1
#27
Pennsylvania
10.1%
95% CI: 8.8–11.5
#28
Michigan
10%
95% CI: 9.3–10.7
#28
New York
10%
95% CI: 9.4–10.7
#30
Nebraska
9.8%
95% CI: 9–10.6
#31
Florida
9.6%
95% CI: 8.8–10.6
#32
New Jersey
9.5%
95% CI: 8.6–10.5
#33
Connecticut
9.2%
95% CI: 8.4–10.1
#33
Massachusetts
9.2%
95% CI: 8.5–10
#35
Maine
9.1%
95% CI: 8.3–9.9
#35
Oregon
9.1%
95% CI: 8.2–10.1
#35
Utah
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
Minnesota
9%
95% CI: 8.5–9.6
#38
North Dakota
9%
95% CI: 8.1–10
#40
Idaho
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#40
Wisconsin
8.9%
95% CI: 8.3–9.6
#42
Nevada
8.8%
95% CI: 7.7–10
#42
Washington
8.8%
95% CI: 8.4–9.3
#44
Alaska
8.5%
95% CI: 7.6–9.4
#45
New Hampshire
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.1
#46
South Dakota
8.1%
95% CI: 6.8–9.6
#46
Wyoming
8.1%
95% CI: 7.3–9
#48
Colorado
7.6%
95% CI: 6.9–8.3
#49
Montana
7.1%
95% CI: 6.5–7.8
#50
Vermont
7%
95% CI: 6.3–7.8
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
Kentucky · June 30, 202630.8%
Kentucky rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 30.8%June 30, 2026 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky · your comparison
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
Kentucky · 2020$6,949
Kentucky rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · $6,9492020 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky · your comparison
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
Kentucky · 2023–202425.3%
Kentucky rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kentucky · 25.3%2023–2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky · your comparison
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
24 of 24 reviewed Kentucky actions · newest first
May 13, 2026 · HR 2267 · NICS Data Reporting Act of 2026 · In CongressU.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 2267
NICS Data Reporting Act of 2026
May 13, 2026 · In Congress
Rep. Thomas Massie · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The House-passed bill would require annual demographic reports on firearm-purchase denials and overturned denials in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. It concerns administration of firearm access; it has not become law.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.NICS reportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report containing, with respect to the preceding year, the demographic data of persons who were determined to be ineligible to purchase a firearm based on a background check performed by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which shall include, disaggregated by the reason for the determination of ineligibility, the following:(1)The race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, disability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if available.(2)In the case of each person whose determination of ineligibility was overturned on appeal, the race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, dis-ability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if available.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 14, 2026 · HB 78 · AN ACT relating to firearms liability protections and declaring an emergency. · EnactedKentucky Legislature · HB 78
AN ACT relating to firearms liability protections and declaring an emergency.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. T.J. Roberts · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law restricts civil claims against firearm manufacturers, sellers, and trade associations arising from criminal or unlawful product misuse, with specified exceptions such as negligent entrustment, contract claims, and certain unlawful conduct or product defects. It also provides remedies for prohibited claims. It is not blanket immunity for every firearm-related injury.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 177). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 177) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The act limits firearm-industry civil liability for criminal or unlawful product misuse, with defined exceptions and remedies against prohibited claims. This concerns accountability for firearm injuries and deaths; it is not itself a change to firearm possession eligibility or proof of injury prevention. Firearm mortality includes multiple intents, and the enactment cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 411 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Manufacturer" means any person engaged in the business of manufacturing a qualified product, including any and all owners, directors, officers, and employees of a manufacturer; (b) "Negligent entrustment": 1. Means the supplying of a qualified product by a seller for use by another person when the seller knows, or reasonably should know, the person to whom the product is supplied is likely to, and does, use the product in a manner involving unreasonable risk of physical injury to the person or others; and 2. Does not include instances in which the harm was caused by a person who was not en trusted with the qualified product directly by the seller; (c) "Person" means any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, or any other entity, including any governmental entity; (d) "Proximate cause" means the requirement that the plaintiff was directly injured by the defendant's allegedly unlawful conduct; (e) "Qualified civil liability action": 1. Means a civil action or proceeding, or an administrative proceeding, or any claim asserted in any actio n or proceeding, brought by any person against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or a trade association, for damages, including punitive damages, injunctive or declaratory relief, abatement, restitution, fines, penalties, or any other relief , resulting from, on the basis of, arising out of, or in relation to the criminal or unlawful misuse, alteration, or modification of a qualified product by the person or a third party, under any theory of liability, including but not limited to statutory c laims, or claims arising from tort or contract; and 2. Does not include a claim: a. Brought against a transferor convicted under 18 U.S.C. sec. 924(h), or a comparable or identical state felony law, by a party directly harmed by the conduct of which the transferee is convicted; b. Brought against a seller for negligent entrustment or negligence per se; c. In which a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product knowingly violated the Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. sec. 921 et seq., the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. sec. 5801 et seq., the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. sec. 2778 et seq., or the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, 50 U.S.C. secs. 4801 to 4852, or any equivalent state statute that is ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 intended to and exclusively does impose specific and conc rete obligations on manufacturers and sellers regarding the manner in which qualified products are manufactured, distributed, or transferred to unlicensed persons, including the obligations in KRS Chapters 237 and 527, and the violation was the sole proxim ate cause of the harm for which relief is sought. This exception does not include claims premised on nuisance or negligence, whether based in statute or common law; d. For breach of contract or warranty in connection with the purchase of the product; or e. For death, physical injuries, or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the product, when lawfully used as intended in a reasonably foreseeable manner, except that where the discharge of the product was caused by a volitional act that meets the elements of a criminal offense, then the act shall be considered the sole proximate cause of any resulting death, personal injuries, or property damage. The exceptions enumerated in this subparagraph shall not be construed to b e in conflict, and this section shall not be construed to create a public or private cause of action, claim, or remedy. The enumerated exceptions in this subparagraph shall be construed to limit the scope of the claims available to the extent that they con flict with the statutory law or common law of this Commonwealth; (f) "Qualified product" means a firearm as defined in KRS 237.060, ammunition as defined in KRS 237.060, or a component part of, or an accessory intended for use with, a firearm or ammunition , including but not limited to ammunition magazines or clips, optical devices, or other products intended to be included in, attached to or used while attached to, or in conjunction with, a firearm or ammunition; (g) "Seller": 1. Means any person engaged in the business of selling a qualified product at wholesale or retail, including import and export, and includes all owners, directors, officers, and employees of the entity; and 2. Does not include entities that meet the definition of "manufacturer" in par agraph (a) of this subsection; (h) "Trade association" means any corporation, unincorporated association, federation, business league, or professional or business organization: 1. That is not organized or operated for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual; 2. That is an organization described in 26 U.S.C. sec. 501(c)(6), and exempt from tax under 26 U.S.C. sec. 501(a); and 3. Two (2) or more members of which are manufacturers or sellers of a qualified product; and (i) "Unlawful use" means conduct that violates a statute, ordinance, or regulation as it relates to the use of a qualified product. (2) A qualified civil liability action shall not be brought against any manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or trade association. (3) This section expressly preempts any local statutes, laws, or regulations that specifically impose liability on qualified product manufacturers, sellers, or trade associations, or that attempt to do so in a generally applicable manner to the extent the state or local law, statute, or regulation allows for civil actions, civil proceedings, and administrative proceedings for damages, punitive damages, injunctive or declaratory relief, abatement, restitution, f ines, penalties, or other relief resulting from criminal misuse, alteration, or modification of a qualified product under any theory of liability, including but not limited to statutory claims or claims arising from tort or contract, except for causes of action expressly allowed in this section. (4) (a) A claim premised on an exception to the immunity granted by this section shall plead with particularity the factual allegations providing the basis for the application of the exception, including but not limited to those necessary to establish scienter and proximate cause. (b) Any qualified civil liability action or any action involving a claim premised on an exception to the immunity granted by subsection (1)(e)2. of this section shall allege particularized facts establishing that the manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or trade association, was the proximate cause of the damages alleged. The court shall determine whether the particularized facts alleged by the plaintiff suffice to establish proximate cause as a matter of law. (c) Any manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or trade association, shall be permitted to make a special motion under this subsection for dismissal or for entry of summary judgment in any qualified civil liability act ion or any action involving a claim premised on an exception to the immunity granted by this section, which shall be heard within forty -five (45) days of the motion. If discovery is required to rule on the motion, the court may order a discovery period not to exceed sixty (60) days and the discovery shall be limited to the issues of whether the action is subject to dismissal under this section. Any denial of a special motion to dismiss or special motion for summary judgment shall be immediately appealable, the appeal shall be expedited, and the timelines in this subsection shall be enforceable as of right by an action in mandamus in the Court of Appeals of Kentucky. (5) Any manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or trade association, harmed by a cla im brought, maintained, or continued in violation of this section after the effective date of this Act may initiate a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction and may seek against any party, or the party's attorney of record: (a) Appropriate injunctive relief; (b) Actual damages; (c) Punitive damages if it is established that the defendant acted with actual malice or with willful misconduct; (d) Costs; and (e) Reasonable attorney's fees. (6) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the provisions of: (a) KRS Chapter 367; (b) Any public nuisance law; or (c) Any general law of this Commonwealth; shall not be considered as statutes intended to and exclusively imposing specific and concrete obligations on manufacturers and sellers regarding the manner in which qualified products are manufactured, distributed, or transferred to unlicensed persons for purposes of this section and shall not provide a basis to circumvent the explicit requirements of subsection (1)(e)2. of this section. (7) A qualified civil liability action may not be brought in any court by a foreign state or government, and the exceptions to the immunity provided in this section shall not apply to claims brought by a foreign state or government. (8) The Attorney General shall have authority to: (a) Enforce the provisions of this section; (b) Intervene in any civil action brought under this section; and (c) Issue guidance to carry out the provisions of this section. Section 2. This Act shall apply to any qualified civ il liability actions, including any claims asserted in any qualified civil liability action, filed on or after the effective date of this Act against a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product, or trade association.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 14, 2026 · HB 312 · AN ACT relating to concealed firearms and deadly weapons. · EnactedKentucky Legislature · HB 312
AN ACT relating to concealed firearms and deadly weapons.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Savannah Maddox · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law establishes provisional concealed-carry licenses for otherwise qualifying people age 18 through 20. Licenses last until age 21 unless suspended or revoked, and conversion to a standard license requires an application and eligibility checks. This is a licensing pathway, not a permitless-carry provision.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 173) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 237 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Provisional license" means a license to carry concealed firearms or other deadly weapons issued pursuant to this section; and (b) "Standard license" means a license to carry concealed firearms o r other deadly weapons issued pursuant to KRS 237.110. (2) The Department of Kentucky State Police shall issue provisional licenses to carry concealed firearms or other deadly weapons, or a combination thereof, to persons who: (a) Are eighteen (18) years of age but younger than twenty-one (21) years of age; and (b) Notwithstanding KRS 237.110(4)(c), otherwise meet the criteria set forth in KRS 237.110(4) and the requirements of KRS 237.110(3). (3) (a) Except as provided in this section, the issuance and reg ulation of provisional licenses to carry concealed firearms and deadly weapons shall be governed by KRS 237.110. (b) Any reference in the Kentucky Revised Statutes to a license issued pursuant to KRS 237.110 shall also be considered a reference to a provisional license issued pursuant to this section. (4) A provisional license issued pursuant to this section shall: (a) Be valid throughout the Commonwealth and, except as provided in other specific sections of the Kentucky Revised Statutes or federal law, per mit the holder of the provisional license to carry firearms, ammunition, other deadly weapons, or a combination thereof, at any location in the Commonwealth; (b) Unless revoked or suspended as provided by law, be valid until the holder turns twenty -one (21) years of age; (c) Authorize the holder of the provisional license to carry a concealed firearm, other deadly weapon, or a combination thereof, on or about his or her person; and (d) Authorize the holder of the provisional license to carry ammunition for a firearm on or about his or her person. (5) A provisional license issued under this section shall be readily distinguishable from a standard license issued pursuant to KRS 237.110. (6) (a) Not less than ninety (90) days before the expiration of the provisional license, the Department of Kentucky State Police shall mail to the holder of the provisional license a written notice of the expiration and an application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license. The application to switch fro m a provisional license to a standard license shall be in a format prescribed by the Department of Kentucky State Police. (b) The outside of the envelope shall bear only the name and address of the applicant. No other information relating to the applicant shall appear on the outside of the envelope sent to the applicant. (c) The holder of a provisional license may apply for a standard license by: 1. Filing with the sheriff of his or her county of residence the paper application form under this subsection, o r filing with the Department of Kentucky State Police an electronic application form in lieu of a paper application form; 2. Stating that he or she remains qualified pursuant to the criteria specified in KRS 237.110(3) and (4); and ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 3. Paying an application fee prescribed by the Department of Kentucky State Police. (d) The sheriff shall issue to the applicant a receipt for the paper application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license and shall date the receipt. The Department of Kentucky S tate Police shall issue to the applicant a receipt for an electronic application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license and shall date the receipt. (e) A standard license under KRS 237.110 shall be issued to a qualified applicant upon: 1. Receipt of the completed application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license; 2. Records check as specified in KRS 237.110(3); 3. Determination that the applicant is not ineligible for a standard license as specified in KRS 237.110(4); and 4. Appropriate payment of fees. Upon issuance of the standard license, the provisional license shall be destroyed by the sheriff. (f) The holder of a provisional license who fails to submit an application to switch from a provisional license to a standard license within six (6) months of the expiration of the provisional license shall be required to submit an application under KRS 237.110. (g) A standard license issued under this subsection shall not be valid until an applicant is twenty -one (21) yea rs of age. A provisional licensee who applies for a standard license under this subsection shall not be required to retake the firearms training described in KRS 237.110(4). (7) A provisional license which has expired shall be void and shall not be valid f or any purpose other than surrender to the sheriff in exchange for a standard license. (8) The Department of Kentucky State Police may promulgate any necessary administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A to administer this section.
The law requires screening children entering state care for earned federal benefits, including Social Security survivor or dependent benefits, within 60 days and applying when eligible. When the cabinet is representative payee, it must conserve the child’s benefits instead of reimbursing care costs and provide accounting and transition safeguards. VA benefits are a separate part of the law, not Social Security beneficiaries.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 605 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) (a) For all children in the care and custody of the cabinet, the cabinet shall determine within sixty (60) days after entry into care whether each child is receiving or eligible for earned federal benefits administered by the United States Social Security Administration or the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, including survivor or dependent benefits. (b) If the cabinet determines that a child is eligible or may be eligible for such earned benefits, the cabinet shall apply for the benefits on behalf of the child in accordance with federal law. (2) If a child began receiving earned federal benefits before entering the cabinet's care and custody, or if the cabinet applies for benefits on behalf of the child, the cabinet shall, in consultation with the child and the child’s attorney, identify an appropriate representative payee consistent with 20 C.F.R. secs. 404.2021 and 416.621 and may apply to become the representative payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. (3) If the cabinet is appointed to serve as the representative payee, the cabinet shall: (a) Not use any of the child’s earned federal benefits, savings, or assets to pay for or reimburse the cabinet or the Commonwealth for any cost of the child’s care, maintenance, supervision, or services; (b) Establish and maintain an account to conserve the child’s earned federal benefits in the child ’s best interests and consistent with federal and state asset and resource limits. Acceptable account types shall include: 1. A special needs trust; 2. A pooled special needs trust; 3. An Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) account established pursua nt to 26 U.S.C. sec. 529A; or 4. Any other account or trust vehicle determined not to interfere with eligibility for public benefits; (c) Provide an annual accounting of the use, application, or conservation of the child’s earned federal benefits to the ch ild, the child’s attorney, and, if parental rights have not been terminated, to the child’s parents or guardians; and (d) Periodically review whether another qualified person or entity could serve as representative payee in the child’s best interests and, if so, shall assist in transferring that role. (4) The cabinet shall review each case annually to determine whether a child in care and custody has become newly eligible for earned federal benefits after the cabinet’s initial determination pursuant to subs ection (1) of this section. (5) The cabinet shall develop and implement a plan for each child in care and custody with conserved earned federal benefits to be called the Success Sequence Savings and Disbursement Plan. The plan shall allow a child who has completed a cabinet -approved financial literacy or savings readiness program to access a portion of conserved benefits upon completion of at least one (1) specific milestone that promotes independence and financial readiness, including but not limited to: (a) Obtaining a driver’s license or state identification card; (b) Graduating from high school or receiving a recognized equivalent; (c) Enrolling in a postsecondary education, vocational training, or apprenticeship program; or (d) Maintaining verified employment for at least six (6) consecutive months. (6) The cabinet shall: ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 (a) Determine reasonable disbursement thresholds and amounts for each milestone to promote long - term savings while rewarding progress toward self-sufficiency; and (b) Ensure that all children participating in the program have access to financial literacy instruction and counseling to support effective use of milestone payments and long -term asset building. (7) Upon termination of the cabinet’s care and custody for the child, the cab inet shall release any remaining conserved funds to: (a) The child, if the child is at least eighteen (18) years of age or emancipated; or (b) The person responsible for the child, if the child remains a minor and is not emancipated. (8) The cabinet shall promulgate administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A and applicable federal laws to implement this section that include but are not limited to rules governing account management, milestone disbursements, reporting, financial literacy ed ucation, and oversight.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 14, 2026 · HB 2 · AN ACT relating to Medicaid, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency. · EnactedKentucky Legislature · HB 2
AN ACT relating to Medicaid, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Ken Fleming · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law requires Medicaid community-engagement eligibility rules by January 1, 2027: the preceding month for an initial application and three months since the last determination for continued enrollment at redetermination, subject to the specified federal framework and exceptions. Notices begin by September 1, 2026, and a delay request requires legislative authorization. If federal requirements are diminished, the separate fallback depends on federal waiver approval. The legislature overrode line-item vetoes. This cannot explain the earlier uninsured rate.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. KRS 205.5371 is amended to read as follows: (1) (a) The cabinet shall, no later than January 1, 2027, for applicable individuals as defined in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(9), condition eligibility for enrollment or continued enrollment in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement as defined in and required under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) . (b) In the case of an applicable individual who is applying for enrollment in the Medicaid program, in order to be eligible for enrollment the individual shall be requir ed to demonstrate community engagement for the month immediately preceding the month during which the individual applies for enrollment. (c) In the case of an applicable individual who is enrolled and receiving Medicaid benefits, in order to remain eligibl e for continued enrollment, at the time of eligibility redetermination, the individual shall be required to demonstrate community engagement for three (3) months during the period of time since the individual's most recent eligibility determination or redetermination. (2) Notwithstanding any provision of state law to the contrary, the cabinet shall not request an exemption, waiver, or any other delay, including but not limited to a good -faith-effort exemption, in implementing the requirements of 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) or subsection (1) of this section that may be available to the state under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(11) unless specifically authorized by the General Assembly to do so . (3) The cabinet shall begin, no later than September 1, 2026, providing notice to all applicable individuals, as defined in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(9) , of the requirement to demonstrate community engagement as established under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) and subsection (1) of this section. Notice provided under this subsection shall comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(8) . (4) If at any time on or after the effective date of this Act, the federal community engagement requirements established in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) are abolished, repealed, or otherwise diminished, the cabinet shall: (a) Immediately prepare and submit a waiver application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services seeking authorization to condition the eligibility of applicable individuals, as ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 defined in subsection (5) of this section, to enroll or continue to be enrolled in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement, as defined in subsection (5) of this section; and (b) For applicable individuals, a s defined in subsection (5) of this section, and in accordance with subsection (1)(b) and (c) of this section, condition eligibility for enrollment or continued enrollment in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement, as defined in subsecti on (5) of this section, if authorized to do so by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (5) As used in subsection (4) of this section : (a) "Applicable individual" means an individual who is: 1. At least nineteen (19) years of age but less than sixty-five (65) years of age; 2. Eligible for enrollment or currently enrolled in the Medicaid program under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) or a waiver that provides coverage that is equivalent to minimum essential coverage as described in Section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and 3. Not: a. Currently, or was not previously, placed in the foster care system if the individual is under twenty-six (26) years of age; b. Eligible for coverage under the Indian Health Service; c. A parent, guardian, caretaker relative, or family caregiver, as defined in the RAISE Family Caregivers Act, Pub. L. No. 115 -119, of a dependent child thirteen (13) years of age or under or a disabled individual; d. A disabled veteran with a disability rated as total under 38 U.S.C. sec. 1155; e. Medically frail or otherwise has special medical needs, including an individual: i. Who is blind or disabled; ii. With a substance use disorder; iii. With a disabling mental condition; iv. With a physical, intellectual, or developmental disability that significantly impairs his or her ability to perform one (1) or more activities of daily living; or v. With a serious or complex medical condition; f. An individual subject to work or community engagement requirements imposed under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, if the individual is in compliance with such requirements; g. An individual participating in a drug addiction or alcohol addiction recovery program recognized by the secretary through the promulgation of administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; h. An inmate at a public institution; i. Pregnant or eligible for coverage under KRS 205.592; or j. An individual experiencing a short -term hardship as defined by the secretary through the promulgation of administrative regu lations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; and (b) "Demonstrated community engagement" means satisfying one (1) or more of the following conditions on a monthly basis: 1. Working, as defined in 7 C.F.R. sec. 273.24, not less than eighty (80) hours; 2. Completing not less than eighty (80) hours of community service; 3. Participating in a work program, as defined in 7 C.F.R. sec. 273.24, for not less than eighty (80) hours; 4. Participating at least half -time in an education program recognized by the secreta ry through the promulgation of administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; 5. Engaging in any combination of activities described in subparagraphs 1., 2., 3., and 4. of this paragraph for a total of not less than eighty (80) hours; 6. Having a verifiable monthly income that is not less than applicable state minimum wage established in KRS 337.275 multiplied by eighty (80) hours; or 7. Having a verifiable average monthly income over the previous six (6) months that is not less than applicable state minimum wage established in KRS 337.275 multiplied by eighty (80) hours if the individual is a seasonal worker as described in Section 45R(d)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 13, 2026 · HB 2 · AN ACT relating to Medicaid, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency. · Partially vetoedGovernor · HB 2
AN ACT relating to Medicaid, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.
Apr 13, 2026 · Partially vetoed
Gov. Andy Beshear · Vetoed
FactVote reviewed summary
Andy Beshear line-item vetoed the three-month community-engagement phrase for continued Medicaid eligibility, citing administrative complexity and potential coverage loss. Those are his stated concerns, not measured outcomes. The legislature overrode the veto.
The original governor message verifies a line-item veto. The General Assembly overrode the veto; the bill is recorded separately as enacted. 04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Time Period for Community Engagement I, Andy Beshear; Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, pursuant to the authority granted under section 88 of the Kentucky Constitution, do hereby veto the following part: Page 1, line 21, after "engagement", delete "for three (3) months". I am vetoing this part because it imposes a more strict requirement than currently in place, requiring administrative and system complexity which will be difficult to implement. It also will likely result in the loss of Medicaid eligibility because the more strict requirement will create unnecessary barriers for individuals. The more strict requirement does not recognize that individuals experience fluctuations in employment, health, caregiving responsibilities, or access to opportunities, and would penalize them for temporary gaps. The more strict requirement will create confusion and lead to otherwise eligible members losing coverage.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Kentucky officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Kentucky candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
36 statements from 14 candidates
2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
As healthcare costs continue to skyrocket and choices diminish, it is clear our nation’s healthcare system is failing the American people. We must restore competition in the marketplace, expand access to high-quality care and end the one-size-fits-all approach taken in recent years.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Transportation
Candidate campaign source
As healthcare costs continue to skyrocket and choices diminish, it is clear our nation’s healthcare system is failing the American people. We must restore competition in the marketplace, expand access to high-quality care and end the one-size-fits-all approach taken in recent years.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Megan Wingfield is fighting for working families, affordable healthcare, and a future where every Kentucky family has a fair shot, not just the wealthy and politically connected.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Megan Wingfield is fighting for working families, affordable healthcare, and a future where every Kentucky family has a fair shot, not just the wealthy and politically connected.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
In Washington, Brett serves as the top Republican on Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee. In this position, he leads the fight for lower costs in health care and keeping the government out of the doctor-patient relationship. In his role on the communications and consumer protection s…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
In Washington, Brett serves as the top Republican on Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee. In this position, he leads the fight for lower costs in health care and keeping the government out of the doctor-patient relationship. In his role on the communications and consumer protection subcommittees he is leading the charge for better and faster internet service in rural areas and protecting consumer privacy online.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
I believe health care is a basic human right. No one should receive a diagnosis and have to worry about going bankrupt, or be forced to choose between their prescription medications and paying for groceries. That’s why I support Medicare for All to ensure that everyone is covered with quality, affor…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
I believe health care is a basic human right. No one should receive a diagnosis and have to worry about going bankrupt, or be forced to choose between their prescription medications and paying for groceries. That’s why I support Medicare for All to ensure that everyone is covered with quality, affordable, accessible care.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
But there is still more work to be done. We need to shore up our rural health care systems. We must allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies. We must expand health insurance coverage to include vision, dental, and hearing. In Congress, I will continue this work to ensure…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
But there is still more work to be done. We need to shore up our rural health care systems. We must allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies. We must expand health insurance coverage to include vision, dental, and hearing. In Congress, I will continue this work to ensure that all Kentuckians have health care coverage that allows them to regularly see a doctor, access affordable prescription medication, and survive an emergency or catastrophic health diagnosis without incurring financial hardship.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kentucky candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Kentucky incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kentucky legislators and Kentucky’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kentucky’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
18 matching sponsorships or proposals · 11 Kentucky incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Adam Moore
Kentucky House of Representatives, District 45 · D–KY
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Adam MooreKentucky Legislature · HB 831
AN ACT relating to abortion.
Mar 10, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Adam Moore · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would add exceptions for lethal fetal anomalies and pregnancies resulting from rape or incest at 22 weeks or less of gestational age, while retaining specified medical exceptions. It did not become law.
03/10/26: to Judiciary (H). Latest official history entry: to Judiciary (H) (2026-03-10). The reviewed regular session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
The fact counts abortions performed in Kentucky in 2024, regardless of residence. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence-based measure. Procedures performed outside Kentucky are outside its scope. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Abortion cases reported in Kentucky. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 2. KRS 311.723 is amended to read as follows: (1) No abortion shall be performed, except the following when performed by a physician based upon his or her reasonable medical judgment: (a) A medical procedure performed with the intent to save the life or preserve the health of an unborn child; (b) Lifesaving miscarriage management, which includes medically necessary interventions when the pregnancy has ended or is in the unavoidable and untreatable process of ending due to spontaneous, missed, or incomplete miscarriage; (c) Sepsis and hemorrhage emergency medical interventions required when a miscarriage or impending miscarriage results in a life-threatening infection or excessive bleeding; (d) A medically necessary intervention, inducement, or delivery for the removal of a dead child from the uterine cavity; (e) The removal of an ectopic pregnancy or a pregnancy that is not implanted normally within the endometrial cavity; (f) The use of methotrexate or similar medications to treat an ectopic pregnancy; (g) The removal of a molar pregnancy; (h) The removal of an unborn child with a lethal fetal anomaly; (i) A medical procedure necessary based on reasonable medical judgment to prevent the death or substantial risk of death of the pregnant woman due to a physical condition, or to prevent serious, permanent impairment of a life- sustaining organ of a pregnant woman. However, the physician shall make reasonable medical efforts under the circumstances to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of the unborn child in a manner consistent with reasonable medical practice; (j) Medical treatment provided to the mother by a licensed physician, which results in the accidental or unintentional injury or death of the unborn human being; or (k) If, in the physician's reasonable medical judgment, the pregnancy is the result of rape under KRS 510.040, 510.050, or 510.060, or incest under KRS 530.020(2)(b) or (c), and the gestational age of the unborn child is twenty- two (22) weeks or less. (2) No treatment or procedure authorized under subsection (1) of this section shall be performed except in compliance with regulations which the cabinet shall promulgate to ensure that: (a) 1. Before the treatment or procedure is performed, the pregnant woman shall have a private medical consultation either with the physician who is to provide the treatment or perform the procedure or with the referring physician in a place, at a time and of a duration reasonably sufficient to enable the physician to determine whether, based upon his or her reasonable medical judgment, the action is necessary; 2. The physician shall document in the pregnant woman's medical record the pregnant woman's informed consent to the treatment or procedure following a discussion, acknowledged in writing by the woman, of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to the treatment or procedure, sufficient in scope for a reasonable person to make an informed decision; (b) The physician who is to provide the treatment or perform the procedure or the referring physician shall describe the basis for his or her reasonable medical judgment that the action is necessary on a form prescribed by the cabinet as required by KRS 213.101; and (c) 1. Paragraph (a) of this subsection shall not apply when, in the reasonable medical judgment of the attending physician based on the particular facts of the case before him or her, there exists a medical emergency. In the case of a medical emergency, the physician shall describe the basis of his or her reasonable medical judgment that an emergency exists on a form prescribed by the cabinet as required by KRS 213.101; and 2. If an emergency exists which limits the time available for documentation or the scope of the informed consent discussion, the physician shall promptly complete any required documentation when the emergency no longer exists. (3) Notwithstanding any statute to the contrary, nothing in this chapter shall be construed as prohibiting a physician from prescribing or a woman from using birth control methods or devices, including, but not limited to, intrauterine devices, oral contraceptives, or any other birth control method or device. (4) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as permitting any violation of KRS 311.772. […] Section 8. KRS 311.772 is amended to read as follows: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Fertilization" means that point in time when a male human sperm penetrates the zona pellucida of a female human ovum; (b) "Medical emergency" or "medically necessary" has the same meaning as in Section 1 of this Act; (c) "Pregnant" means the human female reproductive condition of having a living unborn human being within her body throughout the entire embryonic and fetal stages of the unborn child from fertilization to full gestation and childbirth; and (d) "Unborn human being" means an individual living member of the species homo sapiens throughout the entire embryonic and fetal stages of the unborn child from fertilization to full gestation and childbirth. (2) The provisions of this section shall become effective immediately upon, and to the extent permitted, by the occurrence of any of the following circumstances: (a) Any decision of the United States Supreme Court which reverses, in whole or in part, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), thereby restoring to the Commonwealth of Kentucky the authority to prohibit abortion; or (b) Adoption of an amendment to the United States Constitution which, in whole or in part, restores to the Commonwealth of Kentucky the authority to prohibit abortion. (3) Except as otherwise provided in Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 of this Act and subsections (4) and (6) of this section, no person may knowingly: (a) Administer to, prescribe for, procure for, or sell to any pregnant woman any medicine, drug, or other substance with the specific intent of causing or abetting the termination of the life of an unborn human being; or (b) Use or employ any instrument or procedure upon a pregnant woman with the specific intent of causing or abetting the termination of the life of an unborn human being. (4) The following shall not be a violation of subsection (3) of this section: (a) For a licensed physician to perform a medical procedure that is medically necessary in the reasonable medical judgment of the physician to prevent the death or substantial risk of death due to a physical condition, or to prevent the serious, permanent impairment of a life-sustaining organ of a pregnant woman. However, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, the physician shall make reasonable medical efforts under the circumstances to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of the unborn human being in a manner consistent with reasonable medical practice; (b) For a licensed physician to perform an abortion because of a lethal fetal anomaly; (c) For a licensed physician to perform an abortion if in the reasonable medical judgment of the physician the pregnancy is the result of rape under KRS 510.040, 510.050, or 510.060 or incest under KRS 530.020(2(b) or (c), and the gestational age of the unborn child is twenty-two (22) weeks or less; or (d) Medical treatment provided to the mother by a licensed physician which results in the accidental or unintentional injury or death to the unborn human being. (5) (a) Except as provided in this subsection, and notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, a physician who complies with the requirements of KRS 311.710 to 311.830 shall be immune: 1. From criminal liability and penalty for any harm or damage alleged to arise from an act or omission in the treatment of a woman related to the termination of a pregnancy or a lost pregnancy, except nothing in this paragraph limits any liability for gross negligence or wanton, willful, malicious, or intentional conduct; and 2. From civil liability for any personal injury or damages alleged to arise from the treatment of a pregnant woman, except nothing in this paragraph limits any civil liability for injury or damage arising from a deviation of the accepted medical standard of care, gross negligence, or willful, malicious, or intentional conduct. (b) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to amend, repeal, or alter any other immunity, defense, limitation of liability, or procedure available or required under any other law or contract. (6) Nothing in this section may be construed to subject the pregnant mother upon whom any abortion is performed or attempted to any criminal conviction and penalty. (7) Nothing in this section may be construed to prohibit the sale, use, prescription, or administration of a contraceptive measure, drug, or chemical, if it is administered prior to the time when a pregnancy could be determined through conventional medical testing and if the contraceptive measure is sold, used, prescribed, or administered in accordance with manufacturer instructions. (8) The provisions of this section shall be effective relative to the appropriation of Medicaid funds, to the extent consistent with any executive order by the President of the United States, federal statute, appropriation rider, or federal regulation that sets forth the limited circumstances in which states must fund abortion to remain eligible to receive federal Medicaid funds pursuant to 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396 et seq.
U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 6 · R–KY
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Andy BarrU.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 5618
Housing PLUS Act of 2025
Sep 30, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Andy Barr · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would protect Continuum of Care grant eligibility for programs requiring supportive services or occupancy prerequisites and for faith-based organizations, and reserve at least half of funds for entities offering wraparound services. It concerns housing assistance and occupancy conditions, not a measured change in median rent.
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Kentucky’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Availability of Continuum of Care funds for grantees requiring wraparound services or applying preconditionsSubtitle C of title IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11381 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 436.Availability of funds for grantees requiring wraparound services or applying preconditions (a)AvailabilityNotwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may not, in making amounts available under this subtitle, prohibit, limit, or restrict the award or amount of grants made with such amounts to or for eligible entities, project sponsors, or recipients— (1)that require the provision of supportive services, such as counseling, job training, or addiction treatment, for individuals served by a program, project, or activity assisted with such amounts; (2)that require, as a condition for occupancy in a project, or assistance from a program, project, or activity, assisted with such amounts that individuals meet certain prerequisites, such as sobriety or lack of drug use; or (3)faith-based organizations. (b)Set asideNotwithstanding any other provision of law, in making available amounts under this subtitle for each fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that not less than 50 percent of such amounts shall be used by eligible entities, project sponsors, and recipients that provide or offer access to wraparound services. (c)AccountabilityNot later than 180 days after the completion of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit, to the House Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the Senate, for such fiscal year— (1)a written certification that the amounts made available for carrying out this subtitle were made available in compliance with subsections (a) and (b) of this section; and (2)a report specifying how the Notices of Funding Opportunity for such fiscal year for amounts made available for carrying out this subtitle evidence such compliance..
Kentucky House of Representatives, District 80 · R–KY
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. David MeadeKentucky Legislature · HB 669
AN ACT relating to child welfare.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. David Meade · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law requires screening children entering state care for earned federal benefits, including Social Security survivor or dependent benefits, within 60 days and applying when eligible. When the cabinet is representative payee, it must conserve the child’s benefits instead of reimbursing care costs and provide accounting and transition safeguards. VA benefits are a separate part of the law, not Social Security beneficiaries.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 605 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) (a) For all children in the care and custody of the cabinet, the cabinet shall determine within sixty (60) days after entry into care whether each child is receiving or eligible for earned federal benefits administered by the United States Social Security Administration or the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, including survivor or dependent benefits. (b) If the cabinet determines that a child is eligible or may be eligible for such earned benefits, the cabinet shall apply for the benefits on behalf of the child in accordance with federal law. (2) If a child began receiving earned federal benefits before entering the cabinet's care and custody, or if the cabinet applies for benefits on behalf of the child, the cabinet shall, in consultation with the child and the child’s attorney, identify an appropriate representative payee consistent with 20 C.F.R. secs. 404.2021 and 416.621 and may apply to become the representative payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. (3) If the cabinet is appointed to serve as the representative payee, the cabinet shall: (a) Not use any of the child’s earned federal benefits, savings, or assets to pay for or reimburse the cabinet or the Commonwealth for any cost of the child’s care, maintenance, supervision, or services; (b) Establish and maintain an account to conserve the child’s earned federal benefits in the child ’s best interests and consistent with federal and state asset and resource limits. Acceptable account types shall include: 1. A special needs trust; 2. A pooled special needs trust; 3. An Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) account established pursua nt to 26 U.S.C. sec. 529A; or 4. Any other account or trust vehicle determined not to interfere with eligibility for public benefits; (c) Provide an annual accounting of the use, application, or conservation of the child’s earned federal benefits to the ch ild, the child’s attorney, and, if parental rights have not been terminated, to the child’s parents or guardians; and (d) Periodically review whether another qualified person or entity could serve as representative payee in the child’s best interests and, if so, shall assist in transferring that role. (4) The cabinet shall review each case annually to determine whether a child in care and custody has become newly eligible for earned federal benefits after the cabinet’s initial determination pursuant to subs ection (1) of this section. (5) The cabinet shall develop and implement a plan for each child in care and custody with conserved earned federal benefits to be called the Success Sequence Savings and Disbursement Plan. The plan shall allow a child who has completed a cabinet -approved financial literacy or savings readiness program to access a portion of conserved benefits upon completion of at least one (1) specific milestone that promotes independence and financial readiness, including but not limited to: (a) Obtaining a driver’s license or state identification card; (b) Graduating from high school or receiving a recognized equivalent; (c) Enrolling in a postsecondary education, vocational training, or apprenticeship program; or (d) Maintaining verified employment for at least six (6) consecutive months. (6) The cabinet shall: ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 (a) Determine reasonable disbursement thresholds and amounts for each milestone to promote long - term savings while rewarding progress toward self-sufficiency; and (b) Ensure that all children participating in the program have access to financial literacy instruction and counseling to support effective use of milestone payments and long -term asset building. (7) Upon termination of the cabinet’s care and custody for the child, the cab inet shall release any remaining conserved funds to: (a) The child, if the child is at least eighteen (18) years of age or emancipated; or (b) The person responsible for the child, if the child remains a minor and is not emancipated. (8) The cabinet shall promulgate administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A and applicable federal laws to implement this section that include but are not limited to rules governing account management, milestone disbursements, reporting, financial literacy ed ucation, and oversight.
Kentucky House of Representatives, District 33 · R–KY
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Jason NemesKentucky Legislature · HB 90
AN ACT relating to maternal health and declaring an emergency.
Mar 28, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. Jason Nemes · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The historical law revises abortion-related definitions and enumerates specified medical circumstances, including miscarriage, ectopic or molar pregnancy, and life-protecting procedures, with medical-judgment and documentation provisions. It does not create a general rape or incest exception. Enactment over a veto does not establish current enforceability.
03/28/25: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 121). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 121) (2025-03-28). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact counts abortions performed in Kentucky in 2024, regardless of residence. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence-based measure. Procedures performed outside Kentucky are outside its scope. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Abortion cases reported in Kentucky. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 21. KRS 311.723 is amended to read as follows: (1) No action that requires separating a pregnant woman from her unborn child shall be performed , except the following whe n performed by a physician based upon his or her reasonable medical judgment: (a) A medical procedure performed with the intent to save the life or preserve the health of an unborn child; (b) Lifesaving miscarriage management, which includes medically necessary interventions when the pregnancy has ended or is in the unavoidable and untreatable process of ending due to spontaneous or incomplete miscarriage; (c) Sepsis and hemorrhage emergency medical interventions required when a miscarriage or impending miscarriage results in a life-threatening infection or excessive bleeding; (d) A medically necessary intervention, inducement, or delivery for the removal of a dead child from the uterine cavity, when documented in the woman's medical record along with the results of an obstetric ultrasound test, confirming that fetal cardiac activity is not present at a gestational age when it should be present; (e) The removal of an ectopic pregnancy or a pregnancy that is not implanted normally within the endometrial cavity; (f) The use of methotrexate or similar medications to treat an ectopic pregnancy; (g) The removal of a molar pregnancy; (h) A medical procedure necessary b ased on reasonable medical judgment to prevent the death or substantial risk of death of the pregnant woman due to a physical condition, or to prevent serious, permanent impairment of a life-sustaining organ of a pregnant woman. However, the physician shal l make reasonable medical efforts under the circumstances to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of the unborn child in a manner consistent with reasonable medical practice; or (i) Medical treatment provided to the mother by a licensed physic ian, which results in the accidental or unintentional injury or death of the unborn human being . (2) No treatment or procedure authorized under subsection (1) of this section shall be p erformed except in compliance with regulations which the cabinet shall promulgate to ensure that: (a) 1. Before the treatment or procedure is performed, the pregnant woman shall have a private medical consultation either with the physician who is to provide the treatment or perform the procedure or with the referring physician in a place, at a time and of a duration reasonably sufficient to enable the physician to determine whether, based upon his or her reasonable medical judgment, the action is necessary; 2. The physician shall document in the pregnant woman's medical record the pregnant woman's informed consent to the treatment or procedure following a discussion, acknowledged in writing by the woman, of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to the treatment or procedure, sufficient in scope for a reasonable person to make an informed decision; (b) The physician who is to provide the treatment or perform the procedure or the referring physician will describe the basis for his or her reasonable medical judgment that the action is necessary on a form prescribed by the cabinet as required by KRS 213.101; and (c) 1. Paragraph (a) of this subsection shall not apply wh en, in the reasonable medical judgment of the attending physician based on the particular facts of the case before him or her , there exists a medical emergency. In the case of a medical emergency, the physician shall describe the basis of his or her reasonable medical judgment that an emergency exists on a form prescribed by the cabinet as required by KRS 213.101; and 2. If an emergency exists which limits the time available for documentation or the scope of the informed consent discussion, the physician shall endeavor to complete the requirements of this subsection to the extent possible without undue risk to the woman's life or health and shall promptly complete any required documentation when the emergency no longer exists . (3) Notwithstanding any statute to the contrary, nothing in this chapter shall be construed as prohibiting a physician from prescribing or a woman from using birth control methods or devices, including, but not limited to, intrauterine devices, oral contraceptives, or any other birth control method or device. (4) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as permitting any violation of Section 22 of this Act.
Kentucky House of Representatives, District 48 · R–KY
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Ken FlemingKentucky Legislature · HB 2
AN ACT relating to Medicaid, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.
Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Ken Fleming · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law requires Medicaid community-engagement eligibility rules by January 1, 2027: the preceding month for an initial application and three months since the last determination for continued enrollment at redetermination, subject to the specified federal framework and exceptions. Notices begin by September 1, 2026, and a delay request requires legislative authorization. If federal requirements are diminished, the separate fallback depends on federal waiver approval. The legislature overrode line-item vetoes. This cannot explain the earlier uninsured rate.
04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. KRS 205.5371 is amended to read as follows: (1) (a) The cabinet shall, no later than January 1, 2027, for applicable individuals as defined in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(9), condition eligibility for enrollment or continued enrollment in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement as defined in and required under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) . (b) In the case of an applicable individual who is applying for enrollment in the Medicaid program, in order to be eligible for enrollment the individual shall be requir ed to demonstrate community engagement for the month immediately preceding the month during which the individual applies for enrollment. (c) In the case of an applicable individual who is enrolled and receiving Medicaid benefits, in order to remain eligibl e for continued enrollment, at the time of eligibility redetermination, the individual shall be required to demonstrate community engagement for three (3) months during the period of time since the individual's most recent eligibility determination or redetermination. (2) Notwithstanding any provision of state law to the contrary, the cabinet shall not request an exemption, waiver, or any other delay, including but not limited to a good -faith-effort exemption, in implementing the requirements of 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) or subsection (1) of this section that may be available to the state under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(11) unless specifically authorized by the General Assembly to do so . (3) The cabinet shall begin, no later than September 1, 2026, providing notice to all applicable individuals, as defined in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(9) , of the requirement to demonstrate community engagement as established under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) and subsection (1) of this section. Notice provided under this subsection shall comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(8) . (4) If at any time on or after the effective date of this Act, the federal community engagement requirements established in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) are abolished, repealed, or otherwise diminished, the cabinet shall: (a) Immediately prepare and submit a waiver application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services seeking authorization to condition the eligibility of applicable individuals, as ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 defined in subsection (5) of this section, to enroll or continue to be enrolled in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement, as defined in subsection (5) of this section; and (b) For applicable individuals, a s defined in subsection (5) of this section, and in accordance with subsection (1)(b) and (c) of this section, condition eligibility for enrollment or continued enrollment in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement, as defined in subsecti on (5) of this section, if authorized to do so by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (5) As used in subsection (4) of this section : (a) "Applicable individual" means an individual who is: 1. At least nineteen (19) years of age but less than sixty-five (65) years of age; 2. Eligible for enrollment or currently enrolled in the Medicaid program under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) or a waiver that provides coverage that is equivalent to minimum essential coverage as described in Section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and 3. Not: a. Currently, or was not previously, placed in the foster care system if the individual is under twenty-six (26) years of age; b. Eligible for coverage under the Indian Health Service; c. A parent, guardian, caretaker relative, or family caregiver, as defined in the RAISE Family Caregivers Act, Pub. L. No. 115 -119, of a dependent child thirteen (13) years of age or under or a disabled individual; d. A disabled veteran with a disability rated as total under 38 U.S.C. sec. 1155; e. Medically frail or otherwise has special medical needs, including an individual: i. Who is blind or disabled; ii. With a substance use disorder; iii. With a disabling mental condition; iv. With a physical, intellectual, or developmental disability that significantly impairs his or her ability to perform one (1) or more activities of daily living; or v. With a serious or complex medical condition; f. An individual subject to work or community engagement requirements imposed under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, if the individual is in compliance with such requirements; g. An individual participating in a drug addiction or alcohol addiction recovery program recognized by the secretary through the promulgation of administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; h. An inmate at a public institution; i. Pregnant or eligible for coverage under KRS 205.592; or j. An individual experiencing a short -term hardship as defined by the secretary through the promulgation of administrative regu lations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; and (b) "Demonstrated community engagement" means satisfying one (1) or more of the following conditions on a monthly basis: 1. Working, as defined in 7 C.F.R. sec. 273.24, not less than eighty (80) hours; 2. Completing not less than eighty (80) hours of community service; 3. Participating in a work program, as defined in 7 C.F.R. sec. 273.24, for not less than eighty (80) hours; 4. Participating at least half -time in an education program recognized by the secreta ry through the promulgation of administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; 5. Engaging in any combination of activities described in subparagraphs 1., 2., 3., and 4. of this paragraph for a total of not less than eighty (80) hours; 6. Having a verifiable monthly income that is not less than applicable state minimum wage established in KRS 337.275 multiplied by eighty (80) hours; or 7. Having a verifiable average monthly income over the previous six (6) months that is not less than applicable state minimum wage established in KRS 337.275 multiplied by eighty (80) hours if the individual is a seasonal worker as described in Section 45R(d)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
The proposal would establish a statutory right to abortion before fetal viability or to protect the pregnant person’s life or health, with protections against state interference. It did not become law.
01/13/26: to Judiciary (H). Latest official history entry: to Judiciary (H) (2026-01-13). The reviewed regular session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
The fact counts abortions performed in Kentucky in 2024, regardless of residence. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence-based measure. Procedures performed outside Kentucky are outside its scope. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kentucky evidence context: Abortion cases reported in Kentucky. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) Every individual has a fundamental right to choose or refuse to bear a child or obtain an abortion prior to the viability of the fetus, or to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. (3) The state shall not, in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information, deny or interfere with an individual's fundamental rights, including individuals under state supervision, custody, or control to choose or refuse: (a) Contraception or sterilization; or (b) To bear a child or obtain an abortion. (4) The state shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of these fundamental rights on the basis of sex, disability, race, ethnicity, gender identity, age, marital status, national origin, immigration status, religion, or sexual orientation. (5) Any state or local official who is charged with violating this section shall be subject to an action in federal or state court for injunctive relief and damages, which may be brought by any person or entity that may be aggrieved by the official's actions.
Only current Kentucky officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kentucky statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Kentucky snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Kentucky, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.