Kentucky · individual fact

Kentucky health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages6.8%2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 658.2%2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6565%2024 · #45 of 50 · highest first

Kentucky over time

Explore Kentucky readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kentucky officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kentucky effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kentucky change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Kentucky · source units
KentuckyPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 6.8%4.1%6.8%9.5%Kentucky, 2014: 8.5%Kentucky, 2015: 6%Kentucky, 2016: 5.1%Kentucky, 2017: 5.4%Kentucky, 2018: 5.6%Kentucky, 2019: 6.4%Kentucky, 2021: 5.7%Kentucky, 2022: 5.6%Kentucky, 2023: 5.4%Kentucky, 2024: 6.8%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Kentucky Legislature · 84● U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · 10◆ Governor · 62■ Kentucky agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-06-30

24 of 24 reviewed Kentucky actions match · 20 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

Kentucky · 2024: 6.8% · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kentucky Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodKentuckyRankU.S. benchmark
20246.8%#30 of 508.2%
20235.4%#38 of 50Not available
20225.6%#37 of 50Not available
20215.7%#36 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20196.4%#37 of 50Not available
20185.6%#39 of 50Not available
20175.4%#41 of 50Not available
20165.1%#43 of 50Not available
20156%#40 of 50Not available
20148.5%#36 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kentucky · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Kentucky · 20246.8%
Kentucky rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Kentucky4.6%6.8%9%20142024
2024 · Kentucky: 6.8% · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
20148.5%
20156%
20165.1%
20175.4%
20185.6%
20196.4%
2020Not available
20215.7%
20225.6%
20235.4%
20246.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 6.8%2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky · your comparison6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

8.2%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Kentucky’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
Kentucky · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Kentucky with every state.

Kentucky · 2020$10,257
Kentucky rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Kentucky$7.59K$9.1K$10.6K20142020
2020 · Kentucky: $10,257 · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
2014$7,965
2015$8,306
2016$8,611
2017$8,959
2018$9,332
2019$9,744
2020$10,257

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · $10,2572020 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky · your comparison$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Kentucky · 202273.6 years
Kentucky rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Kentucky population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Life expectancy at birth history in Kentucky71.5 years74.9 years78.3 years20182022
2022 · Kentucky: 73.6 years · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
201875.3 years
201975.5 years
202073.5 years
202172.3 years
202273.6 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 73.6 years2022 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky · your comparison73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Kentucky · 202213%
Kentucky rank#8among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark10.8%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Kentucky9.6%11.5%13.5%20192023
2022 · Kentucky: 13% · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.8% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
201911.8%
202011.6%
202112.5%
202213%
2023Not available

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7%Higher value · 14.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 13%2022 · Rank #8 of 50, highest first95% confidence interval: 11.8% – 14.4%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia14.6%95% CI: 13.6–15.7
#2Arkansas14.1%95% CI: 13–15.3
#3Mississippi13.9%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#4Alabama13.6%95% CI: 12.4–14.9
#5Texas13.4%95% CI: 12.4–14.6
#6Louisiana13.3%95% CI: 12.3–14.3
#7Tennessee13.1%95% CI: 12.1–14.2
#8Kentucky · your comparison13%95% CI: 11.8–14.4
#9Oklahoma12.2%95% CI: 11.4–13.2
#10Delaware11.9%95% CI: 10.7–13.3
#11Arizona11.4%95% CI: 10.4–12.4
#11Ohio11.4%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#13Indiana11.3%95% CI: 10.7–12
#13Virginia11.3%95% CI: 10.6–12.2
#15New Mexico11.2%95% CI: 10–12.4
#16South Carolina11.1%95% CI: 10.3–11.9
#17Georgia11%95% CI: 10.3–11.9
#18Illinois10.8%95% CI: 9.7–11.9
#18North Carolina10.8%95% CI: 9.7–12
#20California10.7%95% CI: 9.8–11.6
#21Maryland10.6%95% CI: 9.9–11.3
#22Hawaii10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#23Iowa10.3%95% CI: 9.6–11.1
#24Kansas10.2%95% CI: 9.6–10.9
#24Missouri10.2%95% CI: 9.4–11.1
#24Rhode Island10.2%95% CI: 9.3–11.1
#27Pennsylvania10.1%95% CI: 8.8–11.5
#28Michigan10%95% CI: 9.3–10.7
#28New York10%95% CI: 9.4–10.7
#30Nebraska9.8%95% CI: 9–10.6
#31Florida9.6%95% CI: 8.8–10.6
#32New Jersey9.5%95% CI: 8.6–10.5
#33Connecticut9.2%95% CI: 8.4–10.1
#33Massachusetts9.2%95% CI: 8.5–10
#35Maine9.1%95% CI: 8.3–9.9
#35Oregon9.1%95% CI: 8.2–10.1
#35Utah9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38Minnesota9%95% CI: 8.5–9.6
#38North Dakota9%95% CI: 8.1–10
#40Idaho8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#40Wisconsin8.9%95% CI: 8.3–9.6
#42Nevada8.8%95% CI: 7.7–10
#42Washington8.8%95% CI: 8.4–9.3
#44Alaska8.5%95% CI: 7.6–9.4
#45New Hampshire8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.1
#46South Dakota8.1%95% CI: 6.8–9.6
#46Wyoming8.1%95% CI: 7.3–9
#48Colorado7.6%95% CI: 6.9–8.3
#49Montana7.1%95% CI: 6.5–7.8
#50Vermont7%95% CI: 6.3–7.8

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Kentucky · June 30, 202630.8%
Kentucky rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 30.8%June 30, 2026 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky · your comparison30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Kentucky · 2020$6,949
Kentucky rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · $6,9492020 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky · your comparison$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Kentucky · 2023–202425.3%
Kentucky rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 25.3%2023–2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky · your comparison25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Kentucky candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

36 statements from 14 candidates

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

James R. Comer

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · KY

Healthcare costs

As healthcare costs continue to skyrocket and choices diminish, it is clear our nation’s healthcare system is failing the American people. We must restore competition in the marketplace, expand access to high-quality care and end the one-size-fits-all approach taken in recent years.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation

Candidate campaign source

As healthcare costs continue to skyrocket and choices diminish, it is clear our nation’s healthcare system is failing the American people. We must restore competition in the marketplace, expand access to high-quality care and end the one-size-fits-all approach taken in recent years.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

James R. Comer campaign source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from James R. Comer
Care & public health

Healthcare

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

James R. Comer campaign source 7 ↗

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Megan Wingfield

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · KY

Health coverage

✅ Expanding affordable housing programs and supporting Medicare for All to ease financial burdens.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

✅ Expanding affordable housing programs and supporting Medicare for All to ease financial burdens.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Megan Wingfield — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 3 more statements from Megan Wingfield
Care & public health

✅ Expand access to VA care and mental health services.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

✅ Expand access to VA care and mental health services.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Megan Wingfield — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

✅ Invest in housing, job training, and suicide prevention.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

✅ Invest in housing, job training, and suicide prevention.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Megan Wingfield — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

Megan Wingfield is fighting for working families, affordable healthcare, and a future where every Kentucky family has a fair shot, not just the wealthy and politically connected.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Megan Wingfield is fighting for working families, affordable healthcare, and a future where every Kentucky family has a fair shot, not just the wealthy and politically connected.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Megan Wingfield — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

S. Brett Guthrie

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · KY

Care & public health

In Washington, Brett serves as the top Republican on Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee. In this position, he leads the fight for lower costs in health care and keeping the government out of the doctor-patient relationship. In his role on the communications and consumer protection s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

In Washington, Brett serves as the top Republican on Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee. In this position, he leads the fight for lower costs in health care and keeping the government out of the doctor-patient relationship. In his role on the communications and consumer protection subcommittees he is leading the charge for better and faster internet service in rural areas and protecting consumer privacy online.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

S. Brett Guthrie — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · KY

Care & public health

We strive to implement policies that will create jobs, improve healthcare access and protect our natural resources for a stable future.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

We strive to implement policies that will create jobs, improve healthcare access and protect our natural resources for a stable future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Maria Teresa Rodriguez — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Morgan McGarvey

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · KY

Health coverage

I believe health care is a basic human right. No one should receive a diagnosis and have to worry about going bankrupt, or be forced to choose between their prescription medications and paying for groceries. That’s why I support Medicare for All to ensure that everyone is covered with quality, affor…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

I believe health care is a basic human right. No one should receive a diagnosis and have to worry about going bankrupt, or be forced to choose between their prescription medications and paying for groceries. That’s why I support Medicare for All to ensure that everyone is covered with quality, affordable, accessible care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 3 more statements from Morgan McGarvey
Health coverage

Supports Medicare negotiating prescription-drug prices; the existing federal program already negotiates selected drugs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Prescription Drugs

Candidate campaign source

Supports Medicare negotiating prescription-drug prices; the existing federal program already negotiates selected drugs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Health coverage

But there is still more work to be done. We need to shore up our rural health care systems. We must allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies. We must expand health insurance coverage to include vision, dental, and hearing. In Congress, I will continue this work to ensure…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

But there is still more work to be done. We need to shore up our rural health care systems. We must allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies. We must expand health insurance coverage to include vision, dental, and hearing. In Congress, I will continue this work to ensure that all Kentuckians have health care coverage that allows them to regularly see a doctor, access affordable prescription medication, and survive an emergency or catastrophic health diagnosis without incurring financial hardship.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Health coverage

Enact Medicare for All to provide universal quality, affordable, and accessible health care.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health Care

Candidate campaign source

Enact Medicare for All to provide universal quality, affordable, and accessible health care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Morgan McGarvey — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kentucky candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kentucky incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kentucky legislators and Kentucky’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kentucky’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

18 matching sponsorships or proposals · 11 Kentucky incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Adam Moore

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 45 · D–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Adam Moore
Kentucky Legislature · HB 831

AN ACT relating to abortion.

Mar 10, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Adam Moore · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would add exceptions for lethal fetal anomalies and pregnancies resulting from rape or incest at 22 weeks or less of gestational age, while retaining specified medical exceptions. It did not become law.

03/10/26: to Judiciary (H). Latest official history entry: to Judiciary (H) (2026-03-10). The reviewed regular session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

The fact counts abortions performed in Kentucky in 2024, regardless of residence. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence-based measure. Procedures performed outside Kentucky are outside its scope. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Abortion cases reported in Kentucky. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 2. KRS 311.723 is amended to read as follows: (1) No abortion shall be performed, except the following when performed by a physician based upon his or her reasonable medical judgment: (a) A medical procedure performed with the intent to save the life or preserve the health of an unborn child; (b) Lifesaving miscarriage management, which includes medically necessary interventions when the pregnancy has ended or is in the unavoidable and untreatable process of ending due to spontaneous, missed, or incomplete miscarriage; (c) Sepsis and hemorrhage emergency medical interventions required when a miscarriage or impending miscarriage results in a life-threatening infection or excessive bleeding; (d) A medically necessary intervention, inducement, or delivery for the removal of a dead child from the uterine cavity; (e) The removal of an ectopic pregnancy or a pregnancy that is not implanted normally within the endometrial cavity; (f) The use of methotrexate or similar medications to treat an ectopic pregnancy; (g) The removal of a molar pregnancy; (h) The removal of an unborn child with a lethal fetal anomaly; (i) A medical procedure necessary based on reasonable medical judgment to prevent the death or substantial risk of death of the pregnant woman due to a physical condition, or to prevent serious, permanent impairment of a life- sustaining organ of a pregnant woman. However, the physician shall make reasonable medical efforts under the circumstances to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of the unborn child in a manner consistent with reasonable medical practice; (j) Medical treatment provided to the mother by a licensed physician, which results in the accidental or unintentional injury or death of the unborn human being; or (k) If, in the physician's reasonable medical judgment, the pregnancy is the result of rape under KRS 510.040, 510.050, or 510.060, or incest under KRS 530.020(2)(b) or (c), and the gestational age of the unborn child is twenty- two (22) weeks or less. (2) No treatment or procedure authorized under subsection (1) of this section shall be performed except in compliance with regulations which the cabinet shall promulgate to ensure that: (a) 1. Before the treatment or procedure is performed, the pregnant woman shall have a private medical consultation either with the physician who is to provide the treatment or perform the procedure or with the referring physician in a place, at a time and of a duration reasonably sufficient to enable the physician to determine whether, based upon his or her reasonable medical judgment, the action is necessary; 2. The physician shall document in the pregnant woman's medical record the pregnant woman's informed consent to the treatment or procedure following a discussion, acknowledged in writing by the woman, of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to the treatment or procedure, sufficient in scope for a reasonable person to make an informed decision; (b) The physician who is to provide the treatment or perform the procedure or the referring physician shall describe the basis for his or her reasonable medical judgment that the action is necessary on a form prescribed by the cabinet as required by KRS 213.101; and (c) 1. Paragraph (a) of this subsection shall not apply when, in the reasonable medical judgment of the attending physician based on the particular facts of the case before him or her, there exists a medical emergency. In the case of a medical emergency, the physician shall describe the basis of his or her reasonable medical judgment that an emergency exists on a form prescribed by the cabinet as required by KRS 213.101; and 2. If an emergency exists which limits the time available for documentation or the scope of the informed consent discussion, the physician shall promptly complete any required documentation when the emergency no longer exists. (3) Notwithstanding any statute to the contrary, nothing in this chapter shall be construed as prohibiting a physician from prescribing or a woman from using birth control methods or devices, including, but not limited to, intrauterine devices, oral contraceptives, or any other birth control method or device. (4) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as permitting any violation of KRS 311.772. […] Section 8. KRS 311.772 is amended to read as follows: (1) As used in this section: (a) "Fertilization" means that point in time when a male human sperm penetrates the zona pellucida of a female human ovum; (b) "Medical emergency" or "medically necessary" has the same meaning as in Section 1 of this Act; (c) "Pregnant" means the human female reproductive condition of having a living unborn human being within her body throughout the entire embryonic and fetal stages of the unborn child from fertilization to full gestation and childbirth; and (d) "Unborn human being" means an individual living member of the species homo sapiens throughout the entire embryonic and fetal stages of the unborn child from fertilization to full gestation and childbirth. (2) The provisions of this section shall become effective immediately upon, and to the extent permitted, by the occurrence of any of the following circumstances: (a) Any decision of the United States Supreme Court which reverses, in whole or in part, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), thereby restoring to the Commonwealth of Kentucky the authority to prohibit abortion; or (b) Adoption of an amendment to the United States Constitution which, in whole or in part, restores to the Commonwealth of Kentucky the authority to prohibit abortion. (3) Except as otherwise provided in Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 of this Act and subsections (4) and (6) of this section, no person may knowingly: (a) Administer to, prescribe for, procure for, or sell to any pregnant woman any medicine, drug, or other substance with the specific intent of causing or abetting the termination of the life of an unborn human being; or (b) Use or employ any instrument or procedure upon a pregnant woman with the specific intent of causing or abetting the termination of the life of an unborn human being. (4) The following shall not be a violation of subsection (3) of this section: (a) For a licensed physician to perform a medical procedure that is medically necessary in the reasonable medical judgment of the physician to prevent the death or substantial risk of death due to a physical condition, or to prevent the serious, permanent impairment of a life-sustaining organ of a pregnant woman. However, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, the physician shall make reasonable medical efforts under the circumstances to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of the unborn human being in a manner consistent with reasonable medical practice; (b) For a licensed physician to perform an abortion because of a lethal fetal anomaly; (c) For a licensed physician to perform an abortion if in the reasonable medical judgment of the physician the pregnancy is the result of rape under KRS 510.040, 510.050, or 510.060 or incest under KRS 530.020(2(b) or (c), and the gestational age of the unborn child is twenty-two (22) weeks or less; or (d) Medical treatment provided to the mother by a licensed physician which results in the accidental or unintentional injury or death to the unborn human being. (5) (a) Except as provided in this subsection, and notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, a physician who complies with the requirements of KRS 311.710 to 311.830 shall be immune: 1. From criminal liability and penalty for any harm or damage alleged to arise from an act or omission in the treatment of a woman related to the termination of a pregnancy or a lost pregnancy, except nothing in this paragraph limits any liability for gross negligence or wanton, willful, malicious, or intentional conduct; and 2. From civil liability for any personal injury or damages alleged to arise from the treatment of a pregnant woman, except nothing in this paragraph limits any civil liability for injury or damage arising from a deviation of the accepted medical standard of care, gross negligence, or willful, malicious, or intentional conduct. (b) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to amend, repeal, or alter any other immunity, defense, limitation of liability, or procedure available or required under any other law or contract. (6) Nothing in this section may be construed to subject the pregnant mother upon whom any abortion is performed or attempted to any criminal conviction and penalty. (7) Nothing in this section may be construed to prohibit the sale, use, prescription, or administration of a contraceptive measure, drug, or chemical, if it is administered prior to the time when a pregnancy could be determined through conventional medical testing and if the contraceptive measure is sold, used, prescribed, or administered in accordance with manufacturer instructions. (8) The provisions of this section shall be effective relative to the appropriation of Medicaid funds, to the extent consistent with any executive order by the President of the United States, federal statute, appropriation rider, or federal regulation that sets forth the limited circumstances in which states must fund abortion to remain eligible to receive federal Medicaid funds pursuant to 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396 et seq.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Andy Barr

U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 6 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Andy Barr
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 5618

Housing PLUS Act of 2025

Sep 30, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Andy Barr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would protect Continuum of Care grant eligibility for programs requiring supportive services or occupancy prerequisites and for faith-based organizations, and reserve at least half of funds for entities offering wraparound services. It concerns housing assistance and occupancy conditions, not a measured change in median rent.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Kentucky’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Availability of Continuum of Care funds for grantees requiring wraparound services or applying preconditionsSubtitle C of title IV of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11381 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 436.Availability of funds for grantees requiring wraparound services or applying preconditions (a)AvailabilityNotwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may not, in making amounts available under this subtitle, prohibit, limit, or restrict the award or amount of grants made with such amounts to or for eligible entities, project sponsors, or recipients— (1)that require the provision of supportive services, such as counseling, job training, or addiction treatment, for individuals served by a program, project, or activity assisted with such amounts; (2)that require, as a condition for occupancy in a project, or assistance from a program, project, or activity, assisted with such amounts that individuals meet certain prerequisites, such as sobriety or lack of drug use; or (3)faith-based organizations. (b)Set asideNotwithstanding any other provision of law, in making available amounts under this subtitle for each fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that not less than 50 percent of such amounts shall be used by eligible entities, project sponsors, and recipients that provide or offer access to wraparound services. (c)AccountabilityNot later than 180 days after the completion of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit, to the House Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the Senate, for such fiscal year— (1)a written certification that the amounts made available for carrying out this subtitle were made available in compliance with subsections (a) and (b) of this section; and (2)a report specifying how the Notices of Funding Opportunity for such fiscal year for amounts made available for carrying out this subtitle evidence such compliance..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Meade

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 80 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Meade
Kentucky Legislature · HB 669

AN ACT relating to child welfare.

Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. David Meade · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law requires screening children entering state care for earned federal benefits, including Social Security survivor or dependent benefits, within 60 days and applying when eligible. When the cabinet is representative payee, it must conserve the child’s benefits instead of reimbursing care costs and provide accounting and transition safeguards. VA benefits are a separate part of the law, not Social Security beneficiaries.

04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 162) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 605 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) (a) For all children in the care and custody of the cabinet, the cabinet shall determine within sixty (60) days after entry into care whether each child is receiving or eligible for earned federal benefits administered by the United States Social Security Administration or the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, including survivor or dependent benefits. (b) If the cabinet determines that a child is eligible or may be eligible for such earned benefits, the cabinet shall apply for the benefits on behalf of the child in accordance with federal law. (2) If a child began receiving earned federal benefits before entering the cabinet's care and custody, or if the cabinet applies for benefits on behalf of the child, the cabinet shall, in consultation with the child and the child’s attorney, identify an appropriate representative payee consistent with 20 C.F.R. secs. 404.2021 and 416.621 and may apply to become the representative payee only if no other suitable candidate is available. (3) If the cabinet is appointed to serve as the representative payee, the cabinet shall: (a) Not use any of the child’s earned federal benefits, savings, or assets to pay for or reimburse the cabinet or the Commonwealth for any cost of the child’s care, maintenance, supervision, or services; (b) Establish and maintain an account to conserve the child’s earned federal benefits in the child ’s best interests and consistent with federal and state asset and resource limits. Acceptable account types shall include: 1. A special needs trust; 2. A pooled special needs trust; 3. An Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) account established pursua nt to 26 U.S.C. sec. 529A; or 4. Any other account or trust vehicle determined not to interfere with eligibility for public benefits; (c) Provide an annual accounting of the use, application, or conservation of the child’s earned federal benefits to the ch ild, the child’s attorney, and, if parental rights have not been terminated, to the child’s parents or guardians; and (d) Periodically review whether another qualified person or entity could serve as representative payee in the child’s best interests and, if so, shall assist in transferring that role. (4) The cabinet shall review each case annually to determine whether a child in care and custody has become newly eligible for earned federal benefits after the cabinet’s initial determination pursuant to subs ection (1) of this section. (5) The cabinet shall develop and implement a plan for each child in care and custody with conserved earned federal benefits to be called the Success Sequence Savings and Disbursement Plan. The plan shall allow a child who has completed a cabinet -approved financial literacy or savings readiness program to access a portion of conserved benefits upon completion of at least one (1) specific milestone that promotes independence and financial readiness, including but not limited to: (a) Obtaining a driver’s license or state identification card; (b) Graduating from high school or receiving a recognized equivalent; (c) Enrolling in a postsecondary education, vocational training, or apprenticeship program; or (d) Maintaining verified employment for at least six (6) consecutive months. (6) The cabinet shall: ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 (a) Determine reasonable disbursement thresholds and amounts for each milestone to promote long - term savings while rewarding progress toward self-sufficiency; and (b) Ensure that all children participating in the program have access to financial literacy instruction and counseling to support effective use of milestone payments and long -term asset building. (7) Upon termination of the cabinet’s care and custody for the child, the cab inet shall release any remaining conserved funds to: (a) The child, if the child is at least eighteen (18) years of age or emancipated; or (b) The person responsible for the child, if the child remains a minor and is not emancipated. (8) The cabinet shall promulgate administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A and applicable federal laws to implement this section that include but are not limited to rules governing account management, milestone disbursements, reporting, financial literacy ed ucation, and oversight.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Jason Nemes

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 33 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jason Nemes
Kentucky Legislature · HB 90

AN ACT relating to maternal health and declaring an emergency.

Mar 28, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Jason Nemes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The historical law revises abortion-related definitions and enumerates specified medical circumstances, including miscarriage, ectopic or molar pregnancy, and life-protecting procedures, with medical-judgment and documentation provisions. It does not create a general rape or incest exception. Enactment over a veto does not establish current enforceability.

03/28/25: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 121). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 121) (2025-03-28). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact counts abortions performed in Kentucky in 2024, regardless of residence. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence-based measure. Procedures performed outside Kentucky are outside its scope. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Abortion cases reported in Kentucky. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 21. KRS 311.723 is amended to read as follows: (1) No action that requires separating a pregnant woman from her unborn child shall be performed , except the following whe n performed by a physician based upon his or her reasonable medical judgment: (a) A medical procedure performed with the intent to save the life or preserve the health of an unborn child; (b) Lifesaving miscarriage management, which includes medically necessary interventions when the pregnancy has ended or is in the unavoidable and untreatable process of ending due to spontaneous or incomplete miscarriage; (c) Sepsis and hemorrhage emergency medical interventions required when a miscarriage or impending miscarriage results in a life-threatening infection or excessive bleeding; (d) A medically necessary intervention, inducement, or delivery for the removal of a dead child from the uterine cavity, when documented in the woman's medical record along with the results of an obstetric ultrasound test, confirming that fetal cardiac activity is not present at a gestational age when it should be present; (e) The removal of an ectopic pregnancy or a pregnancy that is not implanted normally within the endometrial cavity; (f) The use of methotrexate or similar medications to treat an ectopic pregnancy; (g) The removal of a molar pregnancy; (h) A medical procedure necessary b ased on reasonable medical judgment to prevent the death or substantial risk of death of the pregnant woman due to a physical condition, or to prevent serious, permanent impairment of a life-sustaining organ of a pregnant woman. However, the physician shal l make reasonable medical efforts under the circumstances to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of the unborn child in a manner consistent with reasonable medical practice; or (i) Medical treatment provided to the mother by a licensed physic ian, which results in the accidental or unintentional injury or death of the unborn human being . (2) No treatment or procedure authorized under subsection (1) of this section shall be p erformed except in compliance with regulations which the cabinet shall promulgate to ensure that: (a) 1. Before the treatment or procedure is performed, the pregnant woman shall have a private medical consultation either with the physician who is to provide the treatment or perform the procedure or with the referring physician in a place, at a time and of a duration reasonably sufficient to enable the physician to determine whether, based upon his or her reasonable medical judgment, the action is necessary; 2. The physician shall document in the pregnant woman's medical record the pregnant woman's informed consent to the treatment or procedure following a discussion, acknowledged in writing by the woman, of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to the treatment or procedure, sufficient in scope for a reasonable person to make an informed decision; (b) The physician who is to provide the treatment or perform the procedure or the referring physician will describe the basis for his or her reasonable medical judgment that the action is necessary on a form prescribed by the cabinet as required by KRS 213.101; and (c) 1. Paragraph (a) of this subsection shall not apply wh en, in the reasonable medical judgment of the attending physician based on the particular facts of the case before him or her , there exists a medical emergency. In the case of a medical emergency, the physician shall describe the basis of his or her reasonable medical judgment that an emergency exists on a form prescribed by the cabinet as required by KRS 213.101; and 2. If an emergency exists which limits the time available for documentation or the scope of the informed consent discussion, the physician shall endeavor to complete the requirements of this subsection to the extent possible without undue risk to the woman's life or health and shall promptly complete any required documentation when the emergency no longer exists . (3) Notwithstanding any statute to the contrary, nothing in this chapter shall be construed as prohibiting a physician from prescribing or a woman from using birth control methods or devices, including, but not limited to, intrauterine devices, oral contraceptives, or any other birth control method or device. (4) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as permitting any violation of Section 22 of this Act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ken Fleming

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 48 · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ken Fleming
Kentucky Legislature · HB 2

AN ACT relating to Medicaid, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.

Apr 14, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Ken Fleming · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law requires Medicaid community-engagement eligibility rules by January 1, 2027: the preceding month for an initial application and three months since the last determination for continued enrollment at redetermination, subject to the specified federal framework and exceptions. Notices begin by September 1, 2026, and a delay request requires legislative authorization. If federal requirements are diminished, the separate fallback depends on federal waiver approval. The legislature overrode line-item vetoes. This cannot explain the earlier uninsured rate.

04/14/26: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179). Latest official history entry: delivered to Secretary of State (Acts Ch. 179) (2026-04-14). Historical enactment is distinct from governor approval, implementation, later amendments and current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. KRS 205.5371 is amended to read as follows: (1) (a) The cabinet shall, no later than January 1, 2027, for applicable individuals as defined in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(9), condition eligibility for enrollment or continued enrollment in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement as defined in and required under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) . (b) In the case of an applicable individual who is applying for enrollment in the Medicaid program, in order to be eligible for enrollment the individual shall be requir ed to demonstrate community engagement for the month immediately preceding the month during which the individual applies for enrollment. (c) In the case of an applicable individual who is enrolled and receiving Medicaid benefits, in order to remain eligibl e for continued enrollment, at the time of eligibility redetermination, the individual shall be required to demonstrate community engagement for three (3) months during the period of time since the individual's most recent eligibility determination or redetermination. (2) Notwithstanding any provision of state law to the contrary, the cabinet shall not request an exemption, waiver, or any other delay, including but not limited to a good -faith-effort exemption, in implementing the requirements of 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) or subsection (1) of this section that may be available to the state under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(11) unless specifically authorized by the General Assembly to do so . (3) The cabinet shall begin, no later than September 1, 2026, providing notice to all applicable individuals, as defined in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(9) , of the requirement to demonstrate community engagement as established under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) and subsection (1) of this section. Notice provided under this subsection shall comply with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx)(8) . (4) If at any time on or after the effective date of this Act, the federal community engagement requirements established in 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(xx) are abolished, repealed, or otherwise diminished, the cabinet shall: (a) Immediately prepare and submit a waiver application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services seeking authorization to condition the eligibility of applicable individuals, as ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2 defined in subsection (5) of this section, to enroll or continue to be enrolled in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement, as defined in subsection (5) of this section; and (b) For applicable individuals, a s defined in subsection (5) of this section, and in accordance with subsection (1)(b) and (c) of this section, condition eligibility for enrollment or continued enrollment in the Medicaid program on demonstrated community engagement, as defined in subsecti on (5) of this section, if authorized to do so by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (5) As used in subsection (4) of this section : (a) "Applicable individual" means an individual who is: 1. At least nineteen (19) years of age but less than sixty-five (65) years of age; 2. Eligible for enrollment or currently enrolled in the Medicaid program under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) or a waiver that provides coverage that is equivalent to minimum essential coverage as described in Section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and 3. Not: a. Currently, or was not previously, placed in the foster care system if the individual is under twenty-six (26) years of age; b. Eligible for coverage under the Indian Health Service; c. A parent, guardian, caretaker relative, or family caregiver, as defined in the RAISE Family Caregivers Act, Pub. L. No. 115 -119, of a dependent child thirteen (13) years of age or under or a disabled individual; d. A disabled veteran with a disability rated as total under 38 U.S.C. sec. 1155; e. Medically frail or otherwise has special medical needs, including an individual: i. Who is blind or disabled; ii. With a substance use disorder; iii. With a disabling mental condition; iv. With a physical, intellectual, or developmental disability that significantly impairs his or her ability to perform one (1) or more activities of daily living; or v. With a serious or complex medical condition; f. An individual subject to work or community engagement requirements imposed under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, if the individual is in compliance with such requirements; g. An individual participating in a drug addiction or alcohol addiction recovery program recognized by the secretary through the promulgation of administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; h. An inmate at a public institution; i. Pregnant or eligible for coverage under KRS 205.592; or j. An individual experiencing a short -term hardship as defined by the secretary through the promulgation of administrative regu lations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; and (b) "Demonstrated community engagement" means satisfying one (1) or more of the following conditions on a monthly basis: 1. Working, as defined in 7 C.F.R. sec. 273.24, not less than eighty (80) hours; 2. Completing not less than eighty (80) hours of community service; 3. Participating in a work program, as defined in 7 C.F.R. sec. 273.24, for not less than eighty (80) hours; 4. Participating at least half -time in an education program recognized by the secreta ry through the promulgation of administrative regulations in accordance with KRS Chapter 13A; 5. Engaging in any combination of activities described in subparagraphs 1., 2., 3., and 4. of this paragraph for a total of not less than eighty (80) hours; 6. Having a verifiable monthly income that is not less than applicable state minimum wage established in KRS 337.275 multiplied by eighty (80) hours; or 7. Having a verifiable average monthly income over the previous six (6) months that is not less than applicable state minimum wage established in KRS 337.275 multiplied by eighty (80) hours if the individual is a seasonal worker as described in Section 45R(d)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Lindsey Burke

Kentucky House of Representatives, District 75 · D–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Lindsey Burke
Kentucky Legislature · HB 22

AN ACT relating to reproductive privacy.

Jan 13, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Lindsey Burke · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would establish a statutory right to abortion before fetal viability or to protect the pregnant person’s life or health, with protections against state interference. It did not become law.

01/13/26: to Judiciary (H). Latest official history entry: to Judiciary (H) (2026-01-13). The reviewed regular session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

The fact counts abortions performed in Kentucky in 2024, regardless of residence. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence-based measure. Procedures performed outside Kentucky are outside its scope. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Abortion cases reported in Kentucky. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) Every individual has a fundamental right to choose or refuse to bear a child or obtain an abortion prior to the viability of the fetus, or to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. (3) The state shall not, in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information, deny or interfere with an individual's fundamental rights, including individuals under state supervision, custody, or control to choose or refuse: (a) Contraception or sterilization; or (b) To bear a child or obtain an abortion. (4) The state shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of these fundamental rights on the basis of sex, disability, race, ethnicity, gender identity, age, marital status, national origin, immigration status, religion, or sexual orientation. (5) Any state or local official who is charged with violating this section shall be subject to an action in federal or state court for injunctive relief and damages, which may be brought by any person or entity that may be aggrieved by the official's actions.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kentucky officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kentucky statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.