Kentucky · individual fact

Kentucky prices and inflation

Compare Kentucky’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Kentucky CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level90.22024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level962024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level64.32024 · #44 of 50 · highest first

Kentucky over time

Explore Kentucky readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kentucky officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kentucky effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kentucky change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Kentucky · source units
KentuckyPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 90.287.894.5101.3Kentucky, 2014: 91.1Kentucky, 2015: 90.7Kentucky, 2016: 90.7Kentucky, 2017: 90Kentucky, 2018: 89.1Kentucky, 2019: 89.6Kentucky, 2020: 89.1Kentucky, 2021: 89.2Kentucky, 2022: 89.4Kentucky, 2023: 89.9Kentucky, 2024: 90.2201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 28National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockKentucky · Kentucky issues an emergency price-gouging order · 2026-06-27Kentucky price protections● Kentucky Legislature · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.● U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · 2◆ Governor · 2■ Kentucky agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-06-30

4 of 4 reviewed Kentucky actions match · 4 date markers shown. 28 major events shown separately.

Kentucky · 2024: 90.2 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Kentucky with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kentucky All-items price level · source units
PeriodKentuckyRankU.S. benchmark
202490.2#39 of 50100
202389.9#41 of 50100
202289.4#42 of 50100
202189.2#47 of 50100
202089.1#46 of 50100
201989.6#45 of 50100
201889.1#47 of 50100
201790#43 of 50100
201690.7#44 of 50100
201590.7#44 of 50100
201491.1#44 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kentucky · state comparison

How does Kentucky’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Kentucky · 202490.2
Kentucky rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Kentucky with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
All-items price level history in Kentucky87.494.5101.620142024
2024 · Kentucky: 90.2 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky All-items price level history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
201491.1
201590.7
201690.7
201790
201889.1
201989.6
202089.1
202189.2
202289.4
202389.9
202490.2

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 90.22024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky · your comparison90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Kentucky · 20242.9%
Kentucky rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Kentucky-1.2%3.3%7.8%20152024
2024 · Kentucky: 2.9% · Rank #19 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
2015-0.2%
20161%
20171%
20181%
20192%
20200.5%
20214.3%
20226.7%
20234.4%
20242.9%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · 2.9%2024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky · your comparison2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kentucky · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Kentucky · 2024$52,290
Kentucky rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kentucky
Real personal income per person history in Kentucky$39.56K$50.75K$61.95K20142024
2024 · Kentucky: $52,290 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kentucky Real personal income per person history
PeriodKentuckyCompare
2014$42,144
2015$43,986
2016$44,214
2017$45,005
2018$45,925
2019$46,956
2020$50,641
2021$53,512
2022$50,765
2023$51,428
2024$52,290

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kentucky stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kentucky has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kentucky · $52,2902024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kentucky with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky · your comparison$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Kentucky candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

17 statements from 10 candidates

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · KY

CPI / inflation mention

- Restores the original 1913 $3,000 tax exemption, adjusted to today’s dollars and indexed to inflation, which is roughly $100,000.- Ensures low- and middle-income families owe nothing on basic living income, putting more money in their pocket until they start to see real dividends in their own comm…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

- Restores the original 1913 $3,000 tax exemption, adjusted to today’s dollars and indexed to inflation, which is roughly $100,000.- Ensures low- and middle-income families owe nothing on basic living income, putting more money in their pocket until they start to see real dividends in their own communities.- Creates a balancing system that if the Federal Government wants to tax American income then they need to work to create economic and social service systems that improve wages for more Americans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John "Drew" Williams — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 1 more statement from John "Drew" Williams
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

The goal is to create a cost-of-living based Wage System that reflects regional realities, with tiered exemptions for Microbusinesses”As businesses scale, so should the pay of their employees”

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The goal is to create a cost-of-living based Wage System that reflects regional realities, with tiered exemptions for Microbusinesses”As businesses scale, so should the pay of their employees”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

John "Drew" Williams — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

2026 Kentucky U.S. House — District 4 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Ed Gallrein

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 4 · KY

CPI / inflation mention

Ed Gallrein will work to cut taxes, reduce regulations, stop the reckless spending that has driven up inflation, and fight to bring good-paying jobs back home for Kentucky.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Ed Gallrein will work to cut taxes, reduce regulations, stop the reckless spending that has driven up inflation, and fight to bring good-paying jobs back home for Kentucky.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Ed Gallrein — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from Ed Gallrein
CPI / inflation mention

Unleash Our EconomyEd Gallrein will work to cut taxes, reduce regulations, stop the reckless spending that has driven up inflation, and fight to bring good-paying jobs back home for Kentucky.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: ED’S PRIORITIES

Candidate campaign source

Unleash Our EconomyEd Gallrein will work to cut taxes, reduce regulations, stop the reckless spending that has driven up inflation, and fight to bring good-paying jobs back home for Kentucky.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Ed Gallrein — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Jeremy Todd

2 statements

Libertarian · U.S. House District 4 · KY

CPI / inflation mention

I believe government should be as limited as possible, and that includes how it takes money from the people who earn it. Taxation is inherently coercive. Money is taken under threat of enforcement, so it should never be expanded lightly or treated as the default solution to every problem. The more g…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

I believe government should be as limited as possible, and that includes how it takes money from the people who earn it. Taxation is inherently coercive. Money is taken under threat of enforcement, so it should never be expanded lightly or treated as the default solution to every problem. The more government takes, the less freedom individuals and families have to decide how to use the fruits of their own labor.Our goal should be a dramatic reduction in taxation across the board, moving toward a system where people keep as much of what they earn as possible, and where government is forced to live within strict, transparent limits.At the same time, I support restoring sound money and ending the ability of central banking institutions to quietly devalue the currency through inflation. Inflation functions as a hidden tax on everyone, especially working families and savers, eroding purchasing power without a vote or clear accountability.A healthy economy depends on honest money and minimal extraction from the productive class. The more we limit both taxation and monetary manipulation, the more freedom, stability, and prosperity Americans will have.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jeremy Todd campaign source 14 ↗
View 1 more statement from Jeremy Todd
CPI / inflation mention

I recognize that national defense remains a top priority for millions of Americans. Freedom is valuable, and throughout history, Americans have understood that preserving it sometimes requires sacrifice and a strong national defense. However, there is a clear difference between defending our nation …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

I recognize that national defense remains a top priority for millions of Americans. Freedom is valuable, and throughout history, Americans have understood that preserving it sometimes requires sacrifice and a strong national defense. However, there is a clear difference between defending our nation and maintaining a permanent state of endless foreign intervention.Over the past several decades, our military industrial complex—along with the politicians and special interests that profit from it—has transformed America’s military mission from one of defense into one of continual global policing. Instead of focusing on protecting Americans at home, Washington has engaged in costly wars, nation-building efforts, military occupations, and interventions across the globe with little accountability and few measurable benefits to the American people.These endless wars and overseas operations have not made Americans safer. In many cases, they have done the opposite by creating instability, increasing anti-American sentiment, and expanding the number of enemies and conflicts the United States faces around the world. Meanwhile, American taxpayers are left footing the bill for a military empire that now costs well over $1 trillion annually, despite our nation facing historic debt, inflation, and economic uncertainty at home.The Libertarian Party is committed to restoring a defense-first approach to national security. We believe America should maintain a strong military capable of defending our country and responding decisively to direct threats, while ending unnecessary foreign wars and interventionist policies that drain lives, resources, and prosperity. As their candidate and your Congressman, I will work to end the permanent War State, reduce empire-building abroad, stop the reimplementation of the draft, and bring accountability back to U.S. foreign policy. By prioritizing peace, restraint, and true national defense, we can make Americans both safer and more financially secure for generations to come.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jeremy Todd campaign source 5 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kentucky candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kentucky incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kentucky legislators and Kentucky’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kentucky’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Kentucky incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Morgan McGarvey

U.S. House of Representatives, Kentucky District 3 · D–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Morgan McGarvey
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · HR 6756

Black Lung Benefits Improvement Act of 2025

Dec 16, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Morgan McGarvey · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would set a $10,769 annual black-lung disability benefit rate for 2026, paid monthly, and apply a specified inflation adjustment in later years. These cash benefits are separate from Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability benefits. The proposed payment schedule is not an enacted entitlement.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

107.Restoring adequate benefit adjustments for miners suffering from black lung disease and for their dependent family membersSection 412(a) of the Black Lung Benefits Act (30 U.S.C. 922(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: (1)In the case of total disability of a miner due to pneumoconiosis, the disabled miner shall be paid benefits during the disability— (A)for any calendar year preceding January 1, 2026, at a rate equal to 37½ percent of the monthly pay rate for Federal employees in grade GS–2, step 1; (B)for the calendar year beginning on January 1, 2026, at a rate of $10,769.00 per year, payable in 12 equal monthly payments; and (C)for each calendar year thereafter, at a rate equal to the product of the rate in effect under this paragraph for the calendar year immediately preceding such calendar year multiplied by the ratio (not less than 1) of— (i)the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the calendar year immediately preceding such calendar year; to (ii)such Consumer Price Index for the second calendar year preceding such calendar year..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Rand Paul

U.S. Senate, Kentucky · R–KY

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Rand Paul
U.S. Congress · Kentucky delegation · S 1841

Fuel Choice and Deregulation Act of 2025

May 21, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Rand Paul · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The Fuel Choice and Deregulation Act would prohibit EPA restrictions on defined biomass fuels under the Clean Air Act. This concerns fuel supply and composition, including potential gasoline alternatives or blends; it does not set a pump price or establish a price effect.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Kentucky policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Kentucky statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kentucky evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(b) Biomass fuels Section 211 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545) is amended by adding at the end the following: (w) Biomass fuels Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Administrator may not prohibit or control biomass fuel (as defined in section 203 of the Biomass Energy and Alcohol Fuels Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 8802)) under this Act. .
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kentucky officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kentucky statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.