Kansas · individual fact

Kansas income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Kansas’s tax structure.

Median household income$74.28K2020–2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$40.98K2020–2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$59.17K2024 · #20 of 50 · highest first

Kansas over time

Explore Kansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Kansas · source units
KansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $59,172$46.22K$53.66K$61.09KKansas, 2014: $51,238Kansas, 2015: $51,685Kansas, 2016: $51,744Kansas, 2017: $52,848Kansas, 2018: $53,415Kansas, 2019: $54,437Kansas, 2020: $57,358Kansas, 2021: $59,652Kansas, 2022: $59,546Kansas, 2023: $58,664Kansas, 2024: $59,172201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 39National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawKansas · Governor’s Council on Tax Reform · 2019-09-09Governor’s Council on Tax ReformNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanKansas · Ending selected COVID-19 emergency orders · 2021-06-14Ending selected COVID-19 emergency ordersNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsKansas · Kansas’s state sales tax on qualifying food reaches zero · 2025-01-01Kansas state food tax: 0%National context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessKansas · Preserving federal benefits for eligible youth in care · 2025-01-10Preserving federal benefits for eligible youth in careNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Kansas Legislature · 22● U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · 6◆ Governor · 62■ Kansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

14 of 14 reviewed Kansas actions match · 12 date markers shown. 39 major events shown separately.

Kansas · 2024: $59,172 · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kansas Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodKansasRankU.S. benchmark
2024$59,172#20 of 50$59,195
2023$58,664#18 of 50$58,088
2022$59,546#14 of 50$57,104
2021$59,652#20 of 50$59,365
2020$57,358#20 of 50$56,514
2019$54,437#19 of 50$53,683
2018$53,415#19 of 50$52,242
2017$52,848#16 of 50$51,006
2016$51,744#19 of 50$49,828
2015$51,685#16 of 50$49,396
2014$51,238#13 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kansas · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Kansas · 2020–2024$74,275
Kansas rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · $74,2752020–2024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $73,800 – $74,750Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas · your comparison$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$74,2752020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Kansas households, expressed in inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Additional household measure

People below the poverty threshold
10.9%
Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.

  • Household income is not take-home pay and does not directly account for taxes, benefits, household size, debt, or regional cost differences.
  • The poverty measure and income estimate are multi-year survey measures, not current economic forecasts.
Kansas · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Kansas · 2024$59,172
Kansas rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Real personal income per person history in Kansas$45.86K$53.66K$61.45K20142024
2024 · Kansas: $59,172 · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Real personal income per person history
PeriodKansasCompare
2014$51,238
2015$51,685
2016$51,744
2017$52,848
2018$53,415
2019$54,437
2020$57,358
2021$59,652
2022$59,546
2023$58,664
2024$59,172

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · $59,1722024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas · your comparison$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kansas · state comparison

How Kansas raises taxes

Kansas applies two individual-income-tax rates for tax year 2025: 5.2% and 5.58%, with the bracket threshold depending on filing status. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Kansas · FY2024$4.5B
Kansas rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · $4.5BFY2024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas · your comparison$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Sales and use tax

6.5% State + local

Kansas's general State sales-and-use-tax rate is 6.5%, with applicable local rates added. The State rate on qualifying food and food ingredients is 0% beginning January 1, 2025, while local tax can still apply.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Kansas income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Kansas ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Kansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

40 statements from 15 candidates

2026 Kansas Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Chris Mann

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · KS

Taxes & tax policy

If any administration is pushing unconstitutional policies or withholding our congressionally allocated tax dollars – Chris will stand up for Kansans and fight back with everything he has.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

If any administration is pushing unconstitutional policies or withholding our congressionally allocated tax dollars – Chris will stand up for Kansans and fight back with everything he has.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Mann — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Kansas Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 12 statements

Cindy Holscher

9 statements

Democratic · Governor · KS

Taxes & tax policy

Cindy aims to lower residential property tax assessment rates from 11.5% to 9.0%, providing significant tax relief for homeowners across all income levels. She’ll add exemptions to our tax system, too, to make sure that the property tax burden doesn’t push seniors and disabled veterans out of their …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Cindy aims to lower residential property tax assessment rates from 11.5% to 9.0%, providing significant tax relief for homeowners across all income levels. She’ll add exemptions to our tax system, too, to make sure that the property tax burden doesn’t push seniors and disabled veterans out of their homes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 8 more statements from Cindy Holscher
Income & wages

Economic security that prevents lost wages when workers must miss work due to illness, protecting both health and household income. Repeal right to work.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Economic security that prevents lost wages when workers must miss work due to illness, protecting both health and household income. Repeal right to work.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Fund general education and special education to avoid shifting obligation to localities using property taxes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Fund general education and special education to avoid shifting obligation to localities using property taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

Immediate income increases for workers earning entry-level wages, providing immediate purchasing power and economic stability. Allow municipalities to raise the minimum wage higher to keep up with cost of living differences across the state. Regularly assess the minimum wage to ensure that wages kee…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Immediate income increases for workers earning entry-level wages, providing immediate purchasing power and economic stability. Allow municipalities to raise the minimum wage higher to keep up with cost of living differences across the state. Regularly assess the minimum wage to ensure that wages keep up with cost of living.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Lower residential property assessment rates from 11.5% to 9.0%, lowering annual tax burdens and providing significant property tax relief for homeowners across all income levels. Establish a task force to determine other avenues for property tax relief.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Lower residential property assessment rates from 11.5% to 9.0%, lowering annual tax burdens and providing significant property tax relief for homeowners across all income levels. Establish a task force to determine other avenues for property tax relief.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

Every working family should be able to afford a place to raise their kids, but for too many, wages and salaries aren’t keeping up with the cost of housing. Cindy will fight to build more affordable housing in communities that need it. And she’ll fight for fairness for renters as well as homeowners, …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Every working family should be able to afford a place to raise their kids, but for too many, wages and salaries aren’t keeping up with the cost of housing. Cindy will fight to build more affordable housing in communities that need it. And she’ll fight for fairness for renters as well as homeowners, so if they make a late payment, they’re not at risk of losing their homes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

Jobs should pay enough to live on. Cindy is already working to increase the state minimum wage to $16, and to let higher-cost cities and counties set higher minimums so people can keep up. And she’ll fight to make sure that when people need to miss work because they’re sick, they don’t have to go wi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Jobs should pay enough to live on. Cindy is already working to increase the state minimum wage to $16, and to let higher-cost cities and counties set higher minimums so people can keep up. And she’ll fight to make sure that when people need to miss work because they’re sick, they don’t have to go without pay.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Every hard-working Kansan should be able to support their family. As Governor, Cindy will focus on keeping costs down on the essentials — like healthcare, childcare, groceries, and gas — so people don’t have to struggle so hard to get by. She’ll work to make essential family products like diapers ta…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

Every hard-working Kansan should be able to support their family. As Governor, Cindy will focus on keeping costs down on the essentials — like healthcare, childcare, groceries, and gas — so people don’t have to struggle so hard to get by. She’ll work to make essential family products like diapers tax-free, too.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Fully fund Special Education using the savings from expanding Medicaid and new tax revenue from sales of medical marijuana.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Fully fund Special Education using the savings from expanding Medicaid and new tax revenue from sales of medical marijuana.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Ty Masterson

3 statements

Republican · Governor · KS

Taxes & tax policy

Adopt a Homeowners Bill of Rights to protect homeowners from rapidly rising property taxes and give taxpayers a stronger voice.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Kansas Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Adopt a Homeowners Bill of Rights to protect homeowners from rapidly rising property taxes and give taxpayers a stronger voice.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ty Masterson — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 2 more statements from Ty Masterson
Taxes & tax policy

Kansas taxes too much and delivers too little. I led a $2B tax cut. As governor, I’ll cut more — until families can afford to stay.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Kansas taxes too much and delivers too little. I led a $2B tax cut. As governor, I’ll cut more — until families can afford to stay.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ty Masterson — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Led the Kansas Senate’s enactment of $2 billion in tax cuts.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Record

Candidate campaign source

Led the Kansas Senate’s enactment of $2 billion in tax cuts.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ty Masterson — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Kansas Secretary of State — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Pat Proctor

1 statement

Republican · Secretary of State · KS

Taxes & tax policy

Helped enact reforms reducing government regulation and income, property, and sales taxes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Proven Record

Candidate campaign source

Helped enact reforms reducing government regulation and income, property, and sales taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Pat Proctor — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kansas legislators and Kansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

15 matching sponsorships or proposals · 14 Kansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. David Buehler

Kansas House of Representatives, District 40 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Buehler
Kansas Legislature · HB 2664

Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Lance W. Neelly

Kansas House of Representatives, District 42 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Lance W. Neelly
Kansas Legislature · HB 2664

Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Pat Proctor

Kansas House of Representatives, District 41 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Pat Proctor
Kansas Legislature · HB 2664

Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ron Estes

U.S. House of Representatives, Kansas District 4 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ron Estes
U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 2545

Financing Our Energy Future Act

Apr 1, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Ron Estes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 2545: The reviewed section 2 would expand the energy activities whose income qualifies a publicly traded partnership for partnership tax treatment, including specified renewable electricity, energy storage and other generation technologies. This is a proposed financing rule, not a generation mandate or evidence of an operating Kansas project.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Green energy publicly traded partnerships (a)In generalSection 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1)by striking income and gains derived from the exploration and inserting income and gains derived from— (i)the exploration, (2)by inserting or before industrial source, and (3)by striking , or the transportation or storage and all that follows and inserting the following: (ii)the generation of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using any qualified energy resource (as defined in section 45(c)(1)), (iii)the operation of energy property (as defined in section 48(a)(3), determined without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin), (iv)in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3) or (7) of section 45(d) (determined without regard to any placed in service date or date by which construction of the facility is required to begin), the accepting or processing of open-loop biomass or municipal solid waste, (v)the storage of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy storage technology (as defined in section 48(c)(6)), (vi)the generation, storage, or distribution of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy property that is combined heat and power system property (as defined in section 48(c)(3), determined without regard to subparagraph (B)(iii) thereof and without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin), (vii)the transportation or storage of— (I)any fuel described in subsection (b), (c), (d), (e), or (k) of section 6426, or (II)liquified hydrogen or compressed hydrogen, (viii)the conversion of renewable biomass (as defined in subparagraph (I) of section 211(o)(1) of the Clean Air Act (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause)) into renewable fuel (as defined in subparagraph (J) of such section as so in effect), or the storage or transportation of such fuel, (ix)the production, storage, or transportation of any fuel which— (I)uses as its primary feedstock carbon oxides captured from an anthropogenic source or the atmosphere, (II)does not use as its primary feedstock carbon oxide which is deliberately released from naturally occurring subsurface springs, and (III)is determined by the Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to achieve a reduction of not less than a 60 percent in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(H) of the Clean Air Act, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause) compared to baseline lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(C) of such Act, as so in effect), (x)the generation of electric power from a qualifying gasification project (as defined in section 48B(c)(1) without regard to subparagraph (C)) that is described in section 48B(d)(1)(B), (xi)in the case of a qualified facility (as defined in section 45Q(d), without regard to any date by which construction of the facility is required to begin) not less than 50 percent of the total carbon oxide production of which is qualified carbon oxide (as defined in section 45Q(c))— (I)the generation, availability for such generation, or storage of electric power at such facility, or (II)the capture of carbon dioxide by such facility, (xii)the generation of electric power or energy from any advanced nuclear facility (as defined in section 45J(d)(2)), or (xiii)the production, storage, or transportation of any renewable chemical which— (I)is produced in the United States (or in a territory or possession of the United States) from renewable biomass, (II)is not less than 95 percent biobased content, (III)is not sold or used for the production of any food, feed, fuel, or pharmaceuticals, (IV)is approved to use the USDA Certified Biobased Product label under section 9002(b) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8102(b)), and (V)is a chemical intermediate (as such term is defined in section 3201.109 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)),.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Sharice Davids

U.S. House of Representatives, Kansas District 3 · D–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Sharice Davids
U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 8298

SSI Savings and Efficiency Act of 2026

Apr 15, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Sharice Davids · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 8298 would exclude in-kind support and maintenance from countable income in the Supplemental Security Income eligibility and payment calculation, with conforming changes. This concerns the calculation of an income-tested cash benefit; the in-kind assistance itself is not Census money income. SSI is separate from OASDI, and the proposal does not quantify payments or household income.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Census household money income includes wages and specified cash benefits and is measured before taxes. Tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic. A change in an eligibility calculation does not quantify payments or the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Support and maintenance furnished in kind not included as income (a)In generalSection 1612(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382a(a)(2)) is amended— (1) by inserting (other than support or maintenance furnished in kind) after all other income; and (2)in subparagraph (A)— (A) by striking or kind; (B)by striking clause (i) and redesignating clauses (ii) and (iii) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; and (C) in clause (ii) (as so redesignated), by striking and the provisions of clause (i) shall not be applicable. (b)Conforming amendments (1)Section 1611(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(c)) is amended by striking paragraph (6) and redesignating paragraphs (7) through (10) as paragraphs (6) through (9), respectively. (2)Section 1612(a)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382a(a)(2)) is amended— (A) in subparagraph (F), by inserting and at the end; (B) in subparagraph (G), by striking ; and and inserting a period; (C)by moving subparagraph (G) 2 ems to the right; and (D)by striking subparagraph (H). (3)Section 1621(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382j(c)) is amended to read as follows: (c)In determining the amount of income of an alien during the period of 3 years after such alien’s entry into the United States, support or maintenance furnished in cash to the alien by such alien’s sponsor (to the extent that it reflects income or resources which were taken into account in determining the amount of income and resources to be deemed to the alien under subsection (a) or (b) of this section) shall not be considered to be income of such alien under section 1612(a)(2)(A)..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Timothy Johnson

Kansas House of Representatives, District 38 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Timothy Johnson
Kansas Legislature · HB 2664

Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.