Kansas · individual fact

Kansas energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price14.15¢/kWh2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$123.92024 · #36 of 50 · highest first

Kansas over time

Explore Kansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price Kansas · source units
KansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 14.15¢/kWh11.34¢/kWh14.41¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhKansas, 2015: 12.34¢/kWhKansas, 2016: 13.06¢/kWhKansas, 2017: 13.31¢/kWhKansas, 2018: 13.35¢/kWhKansas, 2019: 12.71¢/kWhKansas, 2020: 12.85¢/kWhKansas, 2021: 12.98¢/kWhKansas, 2022: 13.99¢/kWhKansas, 2023: 13.38¢/kWhKansas, 2024: 14.15¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 48National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid review● Kansas Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · 3◆ Governor · 1■ Kansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-09-30

5 of 5 reviewed Kansas actions match · 5 date markers shown. 48 major events shown separately.

Kansas · 2024: 14.15¢/kWh · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Kansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources. In the 2015–2023 historical series, when net storage charging makes that residual negative, FactVote allocates the small adjustment proportionally across positive categories so the nonnegative chart reconciles to EIA's published total. The 2024 comparison retains the source-derived category values without that historical adjustment. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kansas Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodKansasRankU.S. benchmark
202414.15¢/kWh#31 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202313.38¢/kWh#32 of 50Not available
202213.99¢/kWh#21 of 50Not available
202112.98¢/kWh#21 of 50Not available
202012.85¢/kWh#19 of 50Not available
201912.71¢/kWh#19 of 50Not available
201813.35¢/kWh#15 of 50Not available
201713.31¢/kWh#17 of 50Not available
201613.06¢/kWh#17 of 50Not available
201512.34¢/kWh#22 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kansas · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

Kansas · 202414.15¢/kWh
Kansas rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Kansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources. In the 2015–2023 historical series, when net storage charging makes that residual negative, FactVote allocates the small adjustment proportionally across positive categories so the nonnegative chart reconciles to EIA's published total. The 2024 comparison retains the source-derived category values without that historical adjustment. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Residential electricity price history in Kansas11.72¢/kWh14.41¢/kWh17.1¢/kWh20152024
2024 · Kansas: 14.15¢/kWh · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Residential electricity price history
PeriodKansasCompare
201512.34¢/kWh
201613.06¢/kWh
201713.31¢/kWh
201813.35¢/kWh
201912.71¢/kWh
202012.85¢/kWh
202112.98¢/kWh
202213.99¢/kWh
202313.38¢/kWh
202414.15¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 14.15¢/kWh2024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas · your comparison14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Midwest regular gasoline price

$3.85/galWeek of August 31, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Midwest region, including taxes. The region contains Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
-8.7¢
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+75.9¢
Method and limitations

FactVote uses EIA’s Midwest series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Kansas. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current Kansas statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Kansas’s statewide average.
  • The regional average combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Kansas community.
  • Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
  • Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Kansas · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

Kansas · 2024$123.9
Kansas rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in Kansas$92.2$120.49$148.7920102024
2024 · Kansas: $123.9 · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodKansasCompare
2010$98.73
2011$104.7
2012$106.19
2013$107.85
2014$112.95
2015$110.58
2016$117.34
2017$114.65
2018$124.68
2019$113.26
2020$113.52
2021$115.53
2022$129.8
2023$117.91
2024$123.9

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · $123.92024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas · your comparison$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kansas · state comparison

What generates Kansas electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

Kansas · 202457.9 TWh
Kansas rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Kansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources. In the 2015–2023 historical series, when net storage charging makes that residual negative, FactVote allocates the small adjustment proportionally across positive categories so the nonnegative chart reconciles to EIA's published total. The 2024 comparison retains the source-derived category values without that historical adjustment. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Total electricity generation history in Kansas43 TWh53.9 TWh64.7 TWh20152024
2024 · Kansas: 57.9 TWh · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Total electricity generation history
PeriodKansasCompare
201545.5 TWh
201647.6 TWh
201750.9 TWh
201851.7 TWh
201950.9 TWh
202054.5 TWh
202156.6 TWh
202262.2 TWh
202358.5 TWh
202457.9 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 57.9 TWh2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas · your comparison57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Electricity generated from wind

51.5%2024

Wind generation as a share of electricity generated at Kansas facilities, including estimated small-scale solar in the statewide denominator.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

EIA generation totals

Wind
29,795,187 MWh
Total, including small-scale solar
57,862,588 MWh

Other major shares of in-state generation

Coal
22.6%
Nuclear
15.9%
Natural gas
9.2%
Solar
0.5%
Method and limitations

Calculated from EIA's 2024 Kansas workbook: Table 5 wind generation divided by Table 5 total electric-industry generation plus Table 19 estimated small-scale solar generation, rounded to one decimal place.

  • This measures in-state electricity generation, not total energy consumption or the generation mix of imported electricity.
  • The shares are annual and rounded to one decimal; they do not by themselves measure emissions, reliability, affordability, or land use.
Kansas · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

Kansas · 2024289.8 min/year
Kansas rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in Kansas230.8 min/year474.9 min/year718.9 min/year20232024
2024 · Kansas: 289.8 min/year · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodKansasCompare
2023287.1 min/year
2024289.8 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 289.8 min/year2024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas · your comparison289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kansas · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

Kansas · 2024166.4 trillion Btu
Kansas rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 166.4 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas · your comparison166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kansas · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

Kansas · 202455.09 Mt CO₂
Kansas rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 55.09 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas · your comparison55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Kansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

8 statements from 5 candidates

2026 Kansas Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Cindy Holscher

1 statement

Democratic · Governor · KS

Energy & electricity

Cindy has called for a moratorium on new giant corporate data centers — which raise our energy costs and put our farmland and water supplies at risk, often in exchange for taxpayer handouts — until we can set up guardrails to protect our environment, our jobs, and our budgets.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

Cindy has called for a moratorium on new giant corporate data centers — which raise our energy costs and put our farmland and water supplies at risk, often in exchange for taxpayer handouts — until we can set up guardrails to protect our environment, our jobs, and our budgets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Kansas U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Eric Jenkins

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · KS

Energy & electricity

Kansas families deserve an economy that works for them — not one burdened by over-regulation, high energy costs, and policies that ship jobs overseas. Eric will fight for pro-growth policies that keep money in Kansans' pockets.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

Kansas families deserve an economy that works for them — not one burdened by over-regulation, high energy costs, and policies that ship jobs overseas. Eric will fight for pro-growth policies that keep money in Kansans' pockets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Eric Jenkins — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Sharice Davids

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · KS

Energy & electricity

My ValuesI believe we can tackle climate change while unlocking the economic opportunities of clean energy. Kansas has incredible potential in wind and renewable energy, and by investing in sustainable technologies, we can protect our planet for future generations and create good-paying jobs in the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

My ValuesI believe we can tackle climate change while unlocking the economic opportunities of clean energy. Kansas has incredible potential in wind and renewable energy, and by investing in sustainable technologies, we can protect our planet for future generations and create good-paying jobs in the process. Addressing this challenge requires collaboration on all fronts — bringing together businesses, communities, and innovators to lead the way in clean energy solutions. By working together, we can build a sustainable future that strengthens our economy and safeguards our environment.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sharice Davids — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗

2026 Kansas U.S. Senate — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Adam Hamilton

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. Senate · KS

Energy & electricity

End self-destructive tariffs and unnecessary wars, which are driving up energy costs and hurting our ability to add energy capacity. Washington has repeatedly taken actions that directly increase costs and reduce affordability for Kansas families. When Washington imposes sweeping tariff taxes withou…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

End self-destructive tariffs and unnecessary wars, which are driving up energy costs and hurting our ability to add energy capacity. Washington has repeatedly taken actions that directly increase costs and reduce affordability for Kansas families. When Washington imposes sweeping tariff taxes without a vote, the bill lands on Kansas farmers, manufacturers, and families in the form of higher prices on everything from equipment and fertilizer to groceries. The Constitution gives Congress responsibility over trade, and Congress should use it. Adam would prevent future administrations from harming Kansans by requiring congressional approval for new tariffs, and to publish the real cost to American families before those tariffs take effect. This is not a partisan idea. Kansas’s own Senator Jerry Moran has joined a bipartisan bill, the Trade Review Act, led by Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington, to require exactly that.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Adam Hamilton — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Adam Hamilton
Energy & electricity

Require data centers to pay their fair share of electricity costs. Power usage by Data centers, driven by the rapid growth of AI, is growing rapidly throughout the United States, including rural states like Kansas. While these developments can provide economic benefits and jobs to areas that need th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

Require data centers to pay their fair share of electricity costs. Power usage by Data centers, driven by the rapid growth of AI, is growing rapidly throughout the United States, including rural states like Kansas. While these developments can provide economic benefits and jobs to areas that need them, we need to ensure that the companies behind them cover their costs instead of burdening ratepayers and earn the support of the towns and counties they move into. Republicans and Democrats agree on this. But where some support voluntary pledges, Adam would propose binding rules and legislation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Adam Hamilton — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

Stop the war on domestic energy projects and restore energy production tax credits that increase our energy independence and create good-paying jobs. Adam supports all of the above energy production and believes Kansans should decide what happens on their land. More than two dozen Republican members…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

Stop the war on domestic energy projects and restore energy production tax credits that increase our energy independence and create good-paying jobs. Adam supports all of the above energy production and believes Kansans should decide what happens on their land. More than two dozen Republican members of Congress asked to protect these credits before they were repealed, threatening nearly 10,000 jobs and shrinking the state’s economy by over $1 billion.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Adam Hamilton — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Roger Marshall

2 statements

Republican · U.S. Senate · KS

Energy & electricity

Repeal the Natural Gas Tax

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 2026 Campaign Record and Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Repeal the Natural Gas Tax

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Roger Marshall campaign source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Roger Marshall
Energy & electricity

Natural Gas Tax Repeal Act (S. 143) — cosponsor

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Oil, gas, wind, and Kansas-grown ethanol — no apologies for any of them.

Candidate campaign source

Natural Gas Tax Repeal Act (S. 143) — cosponsor

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Roger Marshall campaign source 1 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kansas legislators and Kansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

7 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 Kansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. David Buehler

Kansas House of Representatives, District 40 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Buehler
Kansas Legislature · HB 2664

Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Lance W. Neelly

Kansas House of Representatives, District 42 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Lance W. Neelly
Kansas Legislature · HB 2664

Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Pat Proctor

Kansas House of Representatives, District 41 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Pat Proctor
Kansas Legislature · HB 2664

Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ron Estes

U.S. House of Representatives, Kansas District 4 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ron Estes
U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 2545

Financing Our Energy Future Act

Apr 1, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Ron Estes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 2545: The reviewed section 2 would expand the energy activities whose income qualifies a publicly traded partnership for partnership tax treatment, including specified renewable electricity, energy storage and other generation technologies. This is a proposed financing rule, not a generation mandate or evidence of an operating Kansas project.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Green energy publicly traded partnerships (a)In generalSection 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1)by striking income and gains derived from the exploration and inserting income and gains derived from— (i)the exploration, (2)by inserting or before industrial source, and (3)by striking , or the transportation or storage and all that follows and inserting the following: (ii)the generation of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using any qualified energy resource (as defined in section 45(c)(1)), (iii)the operation of energy property (as defined in section 48(a)(3), determined without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin), (iv)in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3) or (7) of section 45(d) (determined without regard to any placed in service date or date by which construction of the facility is required to begin), the accepting or processing of open-loop biomass or municipal solid waste, (v)the storage of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy storage technology (as defined in section 48(c)(6)), (vi)the generation, storage, or distribution of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy property that is combined heat and power system property (as defined in section 48(c)(3), determined without regard to subparagraph (B)(iii) thereof and without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin), (vii)the transportation or storage of— (I)any fuel described in subsection (b), (c), (d), (e), or (k) of section 6426, or (II)liquified hydrogen or compressed hydrogen, (viii)the conversion of renewable biomass (as defined in subparagraph (I) of section 211(o)(1) of the Clean Air Act (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause)) into renewable fuel (as defined in subparagraph (J) of such section as so in effect), or the storage or transportation of such fuel, (ix)the production, storage, or transportation of any fuel which— (I)uses as its primary feedstock carbon oxides captured from an anthropogenic source or the atmosphere, (II)does not use as its primary feedstock carbon oxide which is deliberately released from naturally occurring subsurface springs, and (III)is determined by the Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to achieve a reduction of not less than a 60 percent in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(H) of the Clean Air Act, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause) compared to baseline lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(C) of such Act, as so in effect), (x)the generation of electric power from a qualifying gasification project (as defined in section 48B(c)(1) without regard to subparagraph (C)) that is described in section 48B(d)(1)(B), (xi)in the case of a qualified facility (as defined in section 45Q(d), without regard to any date by which construction of the facility is required to begin) not less than 50 percent of the total carbon oxide production of which is qualified carbon oxide (as defined in section 45Q(c))— (I)the generation, availability for such generation, or storage of electric power at such facility, or (II)the capture of carbon dioxide by such facility, (xii)the generation of electric power or energy from any advanced nuclear facility (as defined in section 45J(d)(2)), or (xiii)the production, storage, or transportation of any renewable chemical which— (I)is produced in the United States (or in a territory or possession of the United States) from renewable biomass, (II)is not less than 95 percent biobased content, (III)is not sold or used for the production of any food, feed, fuel, or pharmaceuticals, (IV)is approved to use the USDA Certified Biobased Product label under section 9002(b) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8102(b)), and (V)is a chemical intermediate (as such term is defined in section 3201.109 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)),.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Timothy Johnson

Kansas House of Representatives, District 38 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Timothy Johnson
Kansas Legislature · HB 2664

Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Tracey Mann

U.S. House of Representatives, Kansas District 1 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Tracey Mann
U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 8034

Protecting America’s Small Oil and Gas Producers and Rural Jobs Act

Mar 20, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Tracey Mann · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 8034 proposes a marginal-property depletion rate of 15% plus one percentage point per whole dollar that the prior-year crude reference price falls below $70, capped at 25%, with the $70 threshold indexed after 2027. It would remove specified taxable-income limits for marginal-property depletion and separately double the depletable oil quantity from 1,000 to 2,000 barrels. The amendments would apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2026. These upstream tax rules do not establish additional production or lower Midwest regular-gasoline prices.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline price, including Kansas, rather than a Kansas statewide estimate. Crude oil is an input to gasoline; oil-production tax treatment concerns upstream costs without establishing additional output or a pump-price change. Natural gas and higher-ethanol blends are distinct from regular gasoline. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Modification of certain percentage depletion rules with respect to oil and gas wells (a)Percentage depletion rate calculation modified with respect to marginal propertiesSection 613A(c)(6)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: (C)Applicable percentage (i)In generalFor purposes of subparagraph (A), the term applicable percentage means the percentage (not greater than 25 percent) equal to the sum of— (I) 15 percent, plus (II)1 percentage point for each whole dollar by which $70 exceeds the reference price for crude oil for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins. (ii)PPI adjustment (I)In generalIn the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2027, the $70 amount in clause (i)(II) shall be increased by an amount equal to— (aa) such dollar amount, multiplied by (bb)the PPI adjustment factor for such calendar year. (II)PPI adjustment factorFor purposes of subclause (I), the PPI adjustment factor for any calendar year is the percentage (if any) by which— (aa) the PPI for the preceding calendar year, exceeds (bb)the PPI for calendar year 2026. (III)PPI for any calendar yearFor purposes of subclause (II), the PPI for any calendar year is the average of the Producer Price Index for Drilling Oil and Gas Wells, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor, as of the close of the 12-month period ending on August 31 of such calendar year. For purposes of this paragraph, the term reference price means, with respect to any calendar year, the reference price determined for such calendar year under section 45K(d)(2)(C). . (b)Nonapplication of taxable income limitation with respect to marginal propertiesSection 613A(c)(6) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (H)Nonapplication of taxable income limitationWith respect to so much of the allowance for depletion as is determined under subparagraph (A)— (i)subsection (d)(1) shall not apply, and (ii)the second sentence of subsection (a) of section 613 shall not apply.. (c)Depletable oil quantity calculation modifiedSection 613A(c)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 1,000 barrels and inserting 2,000 barrels. (d)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.