Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price14.15¢/kWh2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$123.92024 · #36 of 50 · highest first
Kansas over time
Explore Kansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kansas effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kansas change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Kansas · source units
KansasPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
5 of 5 reviewed Kansas actions match · 5 date markers shown. 48 major events shown separately.
Kansas · 2024: 14.15¢/kWh · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Kansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources. In the 2015–2023 historical series, when net storage charging makes that residual negative, FactVote allocates the small adjustment proportionally across positive categories so the nonnegative chart reconciles to EIA's published total. The 2024 comparison retains the source-derived category values without that historical adjustment. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Kansas Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Kansas · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Kansas · 202414.15¢/kWh
Kansas rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Kansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources. In the 2015–2023 historical series, when net storage charging makes that residual negative, FactVote allocates the small adjustment proportionally across positive categories so the nonnegative chart reconciles to EIA's published total. The 2024 comparison retains the source-derived category values without that historical adjustment. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kansas
2024 · Kansas: 14.15¢/kWh · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kansas Residential electricity price history
Period
Kansas
Compare
2015
12.34¢/kWh
2016
13.06¢/kWh
2017
13.31¢/kWh
2018
13.35¢/kWh
2019
12.71¢/kWh
2020
12.85¢/kWh
2021
12.98¢/kWh
2022
13.99¢/kWh
2023
13.38¢/kWh
2024
14.15¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kansas · 14.15¢/kWh2024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas · your comparison
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Midwest region, including taxes. The region contains Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
-8.7¢
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+75.9¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s Midwest series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Kansas. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current Kansas statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Kansas’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Kansas community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Kansas · 2024$123.9
Kansas rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kansas
2024 · Kansas: $123.9 · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kansas Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Kansas
Compare
2010
$98.73
2011
$104.7
2012
$106.19
2013
$107.85
2014
$112.95
2015
$110.58
2016
$117.34
2017
$114.65
2018
$124.68
2019
$113.26
2020
$113.52
2021
$115.53
2022
$129.8
2023
$117.91
2024
$123.9
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kansas · $123.92024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas · your comparison
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Kansas · 202457.9 TWh
Kansas rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Kansas, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources. In the 2015–2023 historical series, when net storage charging makes that residual negative, FactVote allocates the small adjustment proportionally across positive categories so the nonnegative chart reconciles to EIA's published total. The 2024 comparison retains the source-derived category values without that historical adjustment. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kansas
2024 · Kansas: 57.9 TWh · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kansas Total electricity generation history
Period
Kansas
Compare
2015
45.5 TWh
2016
47.6 TWh
2017
50.9 TWh
2018
51.7 TWh
2019
50.9 TWh
2020
54.5 TWh
2021
56.6 TWh
2022
62.2 TWh
2023
58.5 TWh
2024
57.9 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kansas · 57.9 TWh2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas · your comparison
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Wind generation as a share of electricity generated at Kansas facilities, including estimated small-scale solar in the statewide denominator.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
EIA generation totals
Wind
29,795,187 MWh
Total, including small-scale solar
57,862,588 MWh
Other major shares of in-state generation
Coal
22.6%
Nuclear
15.9%
Natural gas
9.2%
Solar
0.5%
Method and limitations
Calculated from EIA's 2024 Kansas workbook: Table 5 wind generation divided by Table 5 total electric-industry generation plus Table 19 estimated small-scale solar generation, rounded to one decimal place.
This measures in-state electricity generation, not total energy consumption or the generation mix of imported electricity.
The shares are annual and rounded to one decimal; they do not by themselves measure emissions, reliability, affordability, or land use.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Kansas · 2024289.8 min/year
Kansas rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Kansas
2024 · Kansas: 289.8 min/year · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Kansas Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Kansas
Compare
2023
287.1 min/year
2024
289.8 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kansas · 289.8 min/year2024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas · your comparison
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Kansas · 2024166.4 trillion Btu
Kansas rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kansas · 166.4 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas · your comparison
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Kansas · 202455.09 Mt CO₂
Kansas rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Kansas · 55.09 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas · your comparison
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
5 of 5 reviewed Kansas actions · newest first
Apr 10, 2026 · HB 2664 · Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus. · Died in committeeKansas Legislature · HB 2664
Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.
Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee
Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.
Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 9, 2026 · SB 92 · Extending the expiration date for provisions that authorize an electric utility to not offer parallel generation service to certain large load customers and exempt certain large load customers from the determination of the utility's peak demand. · SignedGovernor · SB 92
Extending the expiration date for provisions that authorize an electric utility to not offer parallel generation service to certain large load customers and exempt certain large load customers from the determination of the utility's peak demand.
Apr 9, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Laura Kelly · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Laura Kelly signed SB 92. SB 92 extends from July 1, 2026 to July 1, 2027 the reviewed exceptions for specified new or expanded high-voltage customers in parallel-generation service and utility peak-demand calculations. These interconnection and capacity rules concern customer generation; existing capacity steps reproduced in the act are not new changes, and the extension does not establish wind output.
Approved by Governor on Thursday, April 9, 2026. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(i) (1) A utility shall not be required to make parallel generation service available to any customer who has a new or expanded facility that receives electric service at a voltage of 34.5 kilovolts or higher and commences such electric service on or after July 1, 2025. (2) To determine a utility's historic peak demand for purposes of subsection (h), a utility's peak demand shall not include the additional demand of any new or expanded facility of an industrial, commercial or data center customer that receives electric service at a voltage of 34.5 kilovolts or higher and commences such electric service on or after July 1, 2025. (3) The provisions of this subsection shall expire on July 1, […] 2027.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 20, 2026 · HR 8034 · Protecting America’s Small Oil and Gas Producers and Rural Jobs Act · In CongressU.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 8034
Protecting America’s Small Oil and Gas Producers and Rural Jobs Act
Mar 20, 2026 · In Congress
Rep. Tracey Mann · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HR 8034 proposes a marginal-property depletion rate of 15% plus one percentage point per whole dollar that the prior-year crude reference price falls below $70, capped at 25%, with the $70 threshold indexed after 2027. It would remove specified taxable-income limits for marginal-property depletion and separately double the depletable oil quantity from 1,000 to 2,000 barrels. The amendments would apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2026. These upstream tax rules do not establish additional production or lower Midwest regular-gasoline prices.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The fact is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline price, including Kansas, rather than a Kansas statewide estimate. Crude oil is an input to gasoline; oil-production tax treatment concerns upstream costs without establishing additional output or a pump-price change. Natural gas and higher-ethanol blends are distinct from regular gasoline. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Modification of certain percentage depletion rules with respect to oil and gas wells (a)Percentage depletion rate calculation modified with respect to marginal propertiesSection 613A(c)(6)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: (C)Applicable percentage (i)In generalFor purposes of subparagraph (A), the term applicable percentage means the percentage (not greater than 25 percent) equal to the sum of— (I) 15 percent, plus (II)1 percentage point for each whole dollar by which $70 exceeds the reference price for crude oil for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins. (ii)PPI adjustment (I)In generalIn the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2027, the $70 amount in clause (i)(II) shall be increased by an amount equal to— (aa) such dollar amount, multiplied by (bb)the PPI adjustment factor for such calendar year. (II)PPI adjustment factorFor purposes of subclause (I), the PPI adjustment factor for any calendar year is the percentage (if any) by which— (aa) the PPI for the preceding calendar year, exceeds (bb)the PPI for calendar year 2026. (III)PPI for any calendar yearFor purposes of subclause (II), the PPI for any calendar year is the average of the Producer Price Index for Drilling Oil and Gas Wells, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor, as of the close of the 12-month period ending on August 31 of such calendar year. For purposes of this paragraph, the term reference price means, with respect to any calendar year, the reference price determined for such calendar year under section 45K(d)(2)(C). . (b)Nonapplication of taxable income limitation with respect to marginal propertiesSection 613A(c)(6) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (H)Nonapplication of taxable income limitationWith respect to so much of the allowance for depletion as is determined under subparagraph (A)— (i)subsection (d)(1) shall not apply, and (ii)the second sentence of subsection (a) of section 613 shall not apply.. (c)Depletable oil quantity calculation modifiedSection 613A(c)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 1,000 barrels and inserting 2,000 barrels. (d)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 1, 2025 · HR 2545 · Financing Our Energy Future Act · In CongressU.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 2545
Financing Our Energy Future Act
Apr 1, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Ron Estes · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HR 2545: The reviewed section 2 would expand the energy activities whose income qualifies a publicly traded partnership for partnership tax treatment, including specified renewable electricity, energy storage and other generation technologies. This is a proposed financing rule, not a generation mandate or evidence of an operating Kansas project.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Green energy publicly traded partnerships (a)In generalSection 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1)by striking income and gains derived from the exploration and inserting income and gains derived from— (i)the exploration, (2)by inserting or before industrial source, and (3)by striking , or the transportation or storage and all that follows and inserting the following: (ii)the generation of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using any qualified energy resource (as defined in section 45(c)(1)), (iii)the operation of energy property (as defined in section 48(a)(3), determined without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin), (iv)in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3) or (7) of section 45(d) (determined without regard to any placed in service date or date by which construction of the facility is required to begin), the accepting or processing of open-loop biomass or municipal solid waste, (v)the storage of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy storage technology (as defined in section 48(c)(6)), (vi)the generation, storage, or distribution of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy property that is combined heat and power system property (as defined in section 48(c)(3), determined without regard to subparagraph (B)(iii) thereof and without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin), (vii)the transportation or storage of— (I)any fuel described in subsection (b), (c), (d), (e), or (k) of section 6426, or (II)liquified hydrogen or compressed hydrogen, (viii)the conversion of renewable biomass (as defined in subparagraph (I) of section 211(o)(1) of the Clean Air Act (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause)) into renewable fuel (as defined in subparagraph (J) of such section as so in effect), or the storage or transportation of such fuel, (ix)the production, storage, or transportation of any fuel which— (I)uses as its primary feedstock carbon oxides captured from an anthropogenic source or the atmosphere, (II)does not use as its primary feedstock carbon oxide which is deliberately released from naturally occurring subsurface springs, and (III)is determined by the Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to achieve a reduction of not less than a 60 percent in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(H) of the Clean Air Act, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause) compared to baseline lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(C) of such Act, as so in effect), (x)the generation of electric power from a qualifying gasification project (as defined in section 48B(c)(1) without regard to subparagraph (C)) that is described in section 48B(d)(1)(B), (xi)in the case of a qualified facility (as defined in section 45Q(d), without regard to any date by which construction of the facility is required to begin) not less than 50 percent of the total carbon oxide production of which is qualified carbon oxide (as defined in section 45Q(c))— (I)the generation, availability for such generation, or storage of electric power at such facility, or (II)the capture of carbon dioxide by such facility, (xii)the generation of electric power or energy from any advanced nuclear facility (as defined in section 45J(d)(2)), or (xiii)the production, storage, or transportation of any renewable chemical which— (I)is produced in the United States (or in a territory or possession of the United States) from renewable biomass, (II)is not less than 95 percent biobased content, (III)is not sold or used for the production of any food, feed, fuel, or pharmaceuticals, (IV)is approved to use the USDA Certified Biobased Product label under section 9002(b) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8102(b)), and (V)is a chemical intermediate (as such term is defined in section 3201.109 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)),.
S 510: The reviewed section 2 would expand the energy activities whose income qualifies a publicly traded partnership for partnership tax treatment, including specified renewable electricity, energy storage and other generation technologies. This is a proposed financing rule, not a generation mandate or evidence of an operating Kansas project.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Green energy publicly traded partnerships(a)In generalSection 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—(1)by striking income and gains derived from the exploration and inserting income and gains derived from—(i)the exploration,(2)by inserting or before industrial source, and(3)by striking , or the transportation or storage and all that follows and inserting the following:(ii)the generation of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using any qualified energy resource (as defined in section 45(c)(1)),(iii)the operation of energy property (as defined in section 48(a)(3), determined without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin),(iv)in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3) or (7) of section 45(d) (determined without regard to any placed in service date or date by which construction of the facility is required to begin), the accepting or processing of open-loop biomass or municipal solid waste,(v)the storage of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy storage technology (as defined in section 48(c)(6)),(vi)the generation, storage, or distribution of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy property that is combined heat and power system property (as defined in section 48(c)(3), determined without regard to subparagraph (B)(iii) thereof and without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin),(vii)the transportation or storage of—(I)any fuel described in subsection (b), (c), (d), (e), or (k) of section 6426, or(II)liquified hydrogen or compressed hydrogen,(viii)the conversion of renewable biomass (as defined in subparagraph (I) of section 211(o)(1) of the Clean Air Act (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause)) into renewable fuel (as defined in subparagraph (J) of such section as so in effect), or the storage or transportation of such fuel,(ix)the production, storage, or transportation of any fuel which—(I)uses as its primary feedstock carbon oxides captured from an anthropogenic source or the atmosphere,(II)does not use as its primary feedstock carbon oxide which is deliberately released from naturally occurring subsurface springs, and(III)is determined by the Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to achieve a reduction of not less than a 60 percent in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(H) of the Clean Air Act, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause) compared to baseline lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(C) of such Act, as so in effect),(x)the generation of electric power from a qualifying gasification project (as defined in section 48B(c)(1) without regard to subparagraph (C)) that is described in section 48B(d)(1)(B),(xi)in the case of a qualified facility (as defined in section 45Q(d), without regard to any date by which construction of the facility is required to begin) not less than 50 percent of the total carbon oxide production of which is qualified carbon oxide (as defined in section 45Q(c))—(I)the generation, availability for such generation, or storage of electric power at such facility, or(II)the capture of carbon dioxide by such facility,(xii)the generation of electric power or energy from any advanced nuclear facility (as defined in section 45J(d)(2)), or(xiii)the production, storage, or transportation of any renewable chemical which—(I)is produced in the United States (or in a territory or possession of the United States) from renewable biomass,(II)is not less than 95 percent biobased content,(III)is not sold or used for the production of any food, feed, fuel, or pharmaceuticals,(IV)is approved to use the USDA Certified Biobased Product label under section 9002(b) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8102(b)), and(V)is a chemical intermediate (as such term is defined in section 3201.109 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)),.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Kansas officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Kansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
8 statements from 5 candidates
2026 Kansas Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Cindy has called for a moratorium on new giant corporate data centers — which raise our energy costs and put our farmland and water supplies at risk, often in exchange for taxpayer handouts — until we can set up guardrails to protect our environment, our jobs, and our budgets.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
Cindy has called for a moratorium on new giant corporate data centers — which raise our energy costs and put our farmland and water supplies at risk, often in exchange for taxpayer handouts — until we can set up guardrails to protect our environment, our jobs, and our budgets.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Kansas families deserve an economy that works for them — not one burdened by over-regulation, high energy costs, and policies that ship jobs overseas. Eric will fight for pro-growth policies that keep money in Kansans' pockets.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
Kansas families deserve an economy that works for them — not one burdened by over-regulation, high energy costs, and policies that ship jobs overseas. Eric will fight for pro-growth policies that keep money in Kansans' pockets.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My ValuesI believe we can tackle climate change while unlocking the economic opportunities of clean energy. Kansas has incredible potential in wind and renewable energy, and by investing in sustainable technologies, we can protect our planet for future generations and create good-paying jobs in the …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
My ValuesI believe we can tackle climate change while unlocking the economic opportunities of clean energy. Kansas has incredible potential in wind and renewable energy, and by investing in sustainable technologies, we can protect our planet for future generations and create good-paying jobs in the process. Addressing this challenge requires collaboration on all fronts — bringing together businesses, communities, and innovators to lead the way in clean energy solutions. By working together, we can build a sustainable future that strengthens our economy and safeguards our environment.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
End self-destructive tariffs and unnecessary wars, which are driving up energy costs and hurting our ability to add energy capacity. Washington has repeatedly taken actions that directly increase costs and reduce affordability for Kansas families. When Washington imposes sweeping tariff taxes withou…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
End self-destructive tariffs and unnecessary wars, which are driving up energy costs and hurting our ability to add energy capacity. Washington has repeatedly taken actions that directly increase costs and reduce affordability for Kansas families. When Washington imposes sweeping tariff taxes without a vote, the bill lands on Kansas farmers, manufacturers, and families in the form of higher prices on everything from equipment and fertilizer to groceries. The Constitution gives Congress responsibility over trade, and Congress should use it. Adam would prevent future administrations from harming Kansans by requiring congressional approval for new tariffs, and to publish the real cost to American families before those tariffs take effect. This is not a partisan idea. Kansas’s own Senator Jerry Moran has joined a bipartisan bill, the Trade Review Act, led by Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington, to require exactly that.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Require data centers to pay their fair share of electricity costs. Power usage by Data centers, driven by the rapid growth of AI, is growing rapidly throughout the United States, including rural states like Kansas. While these developments can provide economic benefits and jobs to areas that need th…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
Require data centers to pay their fair share of electricity costs. Power usage by Data centers, driven by the rapid growth of AI, is growing rapidly throughout the United States, including rural states like Kansas. While these developments can provide economic benefits and jobs to areas that need them, we need to ensure that the companies behind them cover their costs instead of burdening ratepayers and earn the support of the towns and counties they move into. Republicans and Democrats agree on this. But where some support voluntary pledges, Adam would propose binding rules and legislation.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Stop the war on domestic energy projects and restore energy production tax credits that increase our energy independence and create good-paying jobs. Adam supports all of the above energy production and believes Kansans should decide what happens on their land. More than two dozen Republican members…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
Stop the war on domestic energy projects and restore energy production tax credits that increase our energy independence and create good-paying jobs. Adam supports all of the above energy production and believes Kansans should decide what happens on their land. More than two dozen Republican members of Congress asked to protect these credits before they were repealed, threatening nearly 10,000 jobs and shrinking the state’s economy by over $1 billion.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Kansas incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kansas legislators and Kansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
7 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 Kansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. David Buehler
Kansas House of Representatives, District 40 · R–KS
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. David BuehlerKansas Legislature · HB 2664
Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.
Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee
Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.
Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Kansas House of Representatives, District 42 · R–KS
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Lance W. NeellyKansas Legislature · HB 2664
Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.
Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee
Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.
Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
Kansas House of Representatives, District 41 · R–KS
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Pat ProctorKansas Legislature · HB 2664
Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.
Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee
Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.
Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
U.S. House of Representatives, Kansas District 4 · R–KS
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Ron EstesU.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 2545
Financing Our Energy Future Act
Apr 1, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Ron Estes · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HR 2545: The reviewed section 2 would expand the energy activities whose income qualifies a publicly traded partnership for partnership tax treatment, including specified renewable electricity, energy storage and other generation technologies. This is a proposed financing rule, not a generation mandate or evidence of an operating Kansas project.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Green energy publicly traded partnerships (a)In generalSection 7704(d)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1)by striking income and gains derived from the exploration and inserting income and gains derived from— (i)the exploration, (2)by inserting or before industrial source, and (3)by striking , or the transportation or storage and all that follows and inserting the following: (ii)the generation of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using any qualified energy resource (as defined in section 45(c)(1)), (iii)the operation of energy property (as defined in section 48(a)(3), determined without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin), (iv)in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3) or (7) of section 45(d) (determined without regard to any placed in service date or date by which construction of the facility is required to begin), the accepting or processing of open-loop biomass or municipal solid waste, (v)the storage of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy storage technology (as defined in section 48(c)(6)), (vi)the generation, storage, or distribution of electric power or thermal energy exclusively using energy property that is combined heat and power system property (as defined in section 48(c)(3), determined without regard to subparagraph (B)(iii) thereof and without regard to any date by which the construction of the facility is required to begin), (vii)the transportation or storage of— (I)any fuel described in subsection (b), (c), (d), (e), or (k) of section 6426, or (II)liquified hydrogen or compressed hydrogen, (viii)the conversion of renewable biomass (as defined in subparagraph (I) of section 211(o)(1) of the Clean Air Act (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause)) into renewable fuel (as defined in subparagraph (J) of such section as so in effect), or the storage or transportation of such fuel, (ix)the production, storage, or transportation of any fuel which— (I)uses as its primary feedstock carbon oxides captured from an anthropogenic source or the atmosphere, (II)does not use as its primary feedstock carbon oxide which is deliberately released from naturally occurring subsurface springs, and (III)is determined by the Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to achieve a reduction of not less than a 60 percent in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(H) of the Clean Air Act, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this clause) compared to baseline lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions (as defined in section 211(o)(1)(C) of such Act, as so in effect), (x)the generation of electric power from a qualifying gasification project (as defined in section 48B(c)(1) without regard to subparagraph (C)) that is described in section 48B(d)(1)(B), (xi)in the case of a qualified facility (as defined in section 45Q(d), without regard to any date by which construction of the facility is required to begin) not less than 50 percent of the total carbon oxide production of which is qualified carbon oxide (as defined in section 45Q(c))— (I)the generation, availability for such generation, or storage of electric power at such facility, or (II)the capture of carbon dioxide by such facility, (xii)the generation of electric power or energy from any advanced nuclear facility (as defined in section 45J(d)(2)), or (xiii)the production, storage, or transportation of any renewable chemical which— (I)is produced in the United States (or in a territory or possession of the United States) from renewable biomass, (II)is not less than 95 percent biobased content, (III)is not sold or used for the production of any food, feed, fuel, or pharmaceuticals, (IV)is approved to use the USDA Certified Biobased Product label under section 9002(b) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8102(b)), and (V)is a chemical intermediate (as such term is defined in section 3201.109 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)),.
Establishing the private energy campus and industrial host-site electric generation act to authorize the provision of energy services to private enterprises located on a private energy campus.
Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee
Rep. Lance W. Neelly · Sponsored / Rep. David Buehler · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Pat Proctor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2664 would authorize specified private-campus electricity sales and negotiated utility interconnection, standby and export agreements. The reviewed provisions retain approval requirements for utility agreements while exempting campus arrangements from parallel-generation and net-metering requirements. This proposed generation framework did not pass and establishes neither a wind project nor additional generation. Campus sales would be limited to on-campus industrial or data-center enterprises. The text separately bars off-campus or cross-right-of-way sales, transfers or deliveries while contemplating utility export agreements; this review does not resolve that apparent tension or infer unrestricted export rights.
Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
Wind generation is the numerator and all Kansas in-state generation, including estimated small-scale solar, is the denominator. Generation financing and interconnection rules concern this mix. An authorization or tax provision is not an operating plant, measured output, or electricity consumed in Kansas. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Electricity generated from wind. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c) A private energy campus may: (1) Sell electricity pursuant to private power purchase agreements and provide ancillary services exclusively to private industrial or data center enterprises that are located on such private energy campus; and (2) enter into interconnection and other service agreements pursuant to subsection (d) with the electric public utility that provides retail electric service in the territory where the private energy campus is located. (d) No sale, transfer or delivery of electricity by a private energy campus shall be made to any entity located outside the physical boundaries of the private energy campus or across any public right-of-way, easement or noncontiguous parcel. (e) Any electric public utility may enter into interconnection and other service agreements with a private energy campus to provide standby or emergency electric services to the private energy campus and authorize the private energy campus to export energy to the utility's electrical system. Any such agreements shall be voluntary and negotiated in good faith between the utility and the private energy campus. (f) (1) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be approved by the commission. The commission may adopt rules and regulations to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby or emergency electric services and energy exports to the utility's electrical system. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to grant the commission jurisdiction over the rates, terms or conditions of private power purchase agreements entered into solely between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus. (2) Any agreement between an electric public utility that is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 HB 2664 3 subject to the jurisdiction of the state corporation commission and a private energy campus shall be subject to approval by the governing body of such utility. The governing body of any such utility may establish tariffs or other requirements to govern such agreements and establish requirements with respect to interconnection, standby service, safety and energy exports the utility's electrical system. (g) A private energy campus and the electric public utility that provides services to such private energy campus shall not be subject to parallel generation service requirements or limitations under K.S.A. 66- 1,184, and amendments thereto, or any of the service requirements or limitations under the net metering and easy connection act, K.S.A. 66- 1263 et seq., and amendments thereto. (h) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, sales of electricity pursuant to a private power purchase agreement between a private energy campus and a private industrial or data center enterprise located on such campus shall not constitute the provision of retail electric service under Kansas law.
U.S. House of Representatives, Kansas District 1 · R–KS
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Tracey MannU.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 8034
Protecting America’s Small Oil and Gas Producers and Rural Jobs Act
Mar 20, 2026 · In Congress
Rep. Tracey Mann · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HR 8034 proposes a marginal-property depletion rate of 15% plus one percentage point per whole dollar that the prior-year crude reference price falls below $70, capped at 25%, with the $70 threshold indexed after 2027. It would remove specified taxable-income limits for marginal-property depletion and separately double the depletable oil quantity from 1,000 to 2,000 barrels. The amendments would apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2026. These upstream tax rules do not establish additional production or lower Midwest regular-gasoline prices.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The fact is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline price, including Kansas, rather than a Kansas statewide estimate. Crude oil is an input to gasoline; oil-production tax treatment concerns upstream costs without establishing additional output or a pump-price change. Natural gas and higher-ethanol blends are distinct from regular gasoline. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Kansas evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Modification of certain percentage depletion rules with respect to oil and gas wells (a)Percentage depletion rate calculation modified with respect to marginal propertiesSection 613A(c)(6)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: (C)Applicable percentage (i)In generalFor purposes of subparagraph (A), the term applicable percentage means the percentage (not greater than 25 percent) equal to the sum of— (I) 15 percent, plus (II)1 percentage point for each whole dollar by which $70 exceeds the reference price for crude oil for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins. (ii)PPI adjustment (I)In generalIn the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2027, the $70 amount in clause (i)(II) shall be increased by an amount equal to— (aa) such dollar amount, multiplied by (bb)the PPI adjustment factor for such calendar year. (II)PPI adjustment factorFor purposes of subclause (I), the PPI adjustment factor for any calendar year is the percentage (if any) by which— (aa) the PPI for the preceding calendar year, exceeds (bb)the PPI for calendar year 2026. (III)PPI for any calendar yearFor purposes of subclause (II), the PPI for any calendar year is the average of the Producer Price Index for Drilling Oil and Gas Wells, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor, as of the close of the 12-month period ending on August 31 of such calendar year. For purposes of this paragraph, the term reference price means, with respect to any calendar year, the reference price determined for such calendar year under section 45K(d)(2)(C). . (b)Nonapplication of taxable income limitation with respect to marginal propertiesSection 613A(c)(6) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (H)Nonapplication of taxable income limitationWith respect to so much of the allowance for depletion as is determined under subparagraph (A)— (i)subsection (d)(1) shall not apply, and (ii)the second sentence of subsection (a) of section 613 shall not apply.. (c)Depletable oil quantity calculation modifiedSection 613A(c)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 1,000 barrels and inserting 2,000 barrels. (d)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
Only current Kansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Kansas snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Kansas, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.