Kansas · individual fact

Kansas prices and inflation

Compare Kansas’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Kansas CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level90.12024 · #41 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level942024 · #45 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level71.22024 · #39 of 50 · highest first

Kansas over time

Explore Kansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Kansas · source units
KansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 90.188.494.8101.2Kansas, 2014: 93.1Kansas, 2015: 92.8Kansas, 2016: 92.1Kansas, 2017: 91.6Kansas, 2018: 92.4Kansas, 2019: 92.7Kansas, 2020: 92.3Kansas, 2021: 91.3Kansas, 2022: 89.6Kansas, 2023: 89.9Kansas, 2024: 90.1201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 28National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutKansas · Kansas’s state sales tax on qualifying food reaches zero · 2025-01-01Kansas state food tax: 0%National context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Kansas Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · 1◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Kansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-04-30

2 of 2 reviewed Kansas actions match · 2 date markers shown. 28 major events shown separately.

Kansas · 2024: 90.1 · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Kansas with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kansas All-items price level · source units
PeriodKansasRankU.S. benchmark
202490.1#41 of 50100
202389.9#40 of 50100
202289.6#41 of 50100
202191.3#39 of 50100
202092.3#30 of 50100
201992.7#35 of 50100
201892.4#32 of 50100
201791.6#39 of 50100
201692.1#38 of 50100
201592.8#36 of 50100
201493.1#36 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kansas · state comparison

How does Kansas’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Kansas · 202490.1
Kansas rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Kansas with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
All-items price level history in Kansas88.194.8101.620142024
2024 · Kansas: 90.1 · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas All-items price level history
PeriodKansasCompare
201493.1
201592.8
201692.1
201791.6
201892.4
201992.7
202092.3
202191.3
202289.6
202389.9
202490.1

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 90.12024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas · your comparison90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kansas · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Kansas · 20242.8%
Kansas rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Kansas-1.2%3.2%7.5%20152024
2024 · Kansas: 2.8% · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodKansasCompare
2015-0.2%
20160.2%
20171.2%
20183%
20191.8%
20200.6%
20213%
20224.6%
20234.1%
20242.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 2.8%2024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas · your comparison2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kansas · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Kansas · 2024$59,172
Kansas rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Real personal income per person history in Kansas$45.86K$53.66K$61.45K20142024
2024 · Kansas: $59,172 · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Real personal income per person history
PeriodKansasCompare
2014$51,238
2015$51,685
2016$51,744
2017$52,848
2018$53,415
2019$54,437
2020$57,358
2021$59,652
2022$59,546
2023$58,664
2024$59,172

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · $59,1722024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas · your comparison$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Kansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

12 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Kansas Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Cindy Holscher

2 statements

Democratic · Governor · KS

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Immediate income increases for workers earning entry-level wages, providing immediate purchasing power and economic stability. Allow municipalities to raise the minimum wage higher to keep up with cost of living differences across the state. Regularly assess the minimum wage to ensure that wages kee…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Immediate income increases for workers earning entry-level wages, providing immediate purchasing power and economic stability. Allow municipalities to raise the minimum wage higher to keep up with cost of living differences across the state. Regularly assess the minimum wage to ensure that wages keep up with cost of living.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Cindy Holscher
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Cindy has called for a moratorium on new giant corporate data centers — which raise our energy costs and put our farmland and water supplies at risk, often in exchange for taxpayer handouts — until we can set up guardrails to protect our environment, our jobs, and our budgets.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

Cindy has called for a moratorium on new giant corporate data centers — which raise our energy costs and put our farmland and water supplies at risk, often in exchange for taxpayer handouts — until we can set up guardrails to protect our environment, our jobs, and our budgets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Ty Masterson

1 statement

Republican · Governor · KS

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Protect families, farms, schools, hospitals, and small businesses from higher utility costs created by outside interests.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Kansas Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Protect families, farms, schools, hospitals, and small businesses from higher utility costs created by outside interests.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ty Masterson — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Kansas U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Don Coover

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · KS

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Reduce grocery and housing costs for families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Reduce grocery and housing costs for families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Don Coover campaign source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Don Coover
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

I believe that everyone wants to work hard and provide for their families. But I talk to folks everyday, and there’s a lot of despair. We all see it with rising grocery and housing costs and the closing of local hospitals. And politicians in Washington keep making things worse. They either don’t kno…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Why I'm Running

Candidate campaign source

I believe that everyone wants to work hard and provide for their families. But I talk to folks everyday, and there’s a lot of despair. We all see it with rising grocery and housing costs and the closing of local hospitals. And politicians in Washington keep making things worse. They either don’t know what the hell they’re doing, or they’re too focused on their own reelection or what their party leaders want.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Don Coover campaign source 1 ↗

John Hauer

1 statement

Libertarian · U.S. House District 2 · KS

CPI / inflation mention

Attack inflation. No more sending tax dollars overseas, every dollar stays here. No more corporate bailouts.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Attack inflation. No more sending tax dollars overseas, every dollar stays here. No more corporate bailouts.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

John Hauer — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Kansas U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Eric Jenkins

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · KS

CPI / inflation mention

Washington has a spending problem — and Kansas families are paying for it through inflation, higher taxes, and a crushing national debt that threatens future generations. Eric Jenkins has spent his entire public career fighting wasteful spending at the local level, and he'll bring that same discipli…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Washington has a spending problem — and Kansas families are paying for it through inflation, higher taxes, and a crushing national debt that threatens future generations. Eric Jenkins has spent his entire public career fighting wasteful spending at the local level, and he'll bring that same discipline to Congress.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Eric Jenkins — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from Eric Jenkins
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Kansas families deserve an economy that works for them — not one burdened by over-regulation, high energy costs, and policies that ship jobs overseas. Eric will fight for pro-growth policies that keep money in Kansans' pockets.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and natural resources

Candidate campaign source

Kansas families deserve an economy that works for them — not one burdened by over-regulation, high energy costs, and policies that ship jobs overseas. Eric will fight for pro-growth policies that keep money in Kansans' pockets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Eric Jenkins — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kansas legislators and Kansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

6 matching sponsorships or proposals · 6 Kansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Tracey Mann

U.S. House of Representatives, Kansas District 1 · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Tracey Mann
U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · HR 8034

Protecting America’s Small Oil and Gas Producers and Rural Jobs Act

Mar 20, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Tracey Mann · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 8034 proposes a marginal-property depletion rate of 15% plus one percentage point per whole dollar that the prior-year crude reference price falls below $70, capped at 25%, with the $70 threshold indexed after 2027. It would remove specified taxable-income limits for marginal-property depletion and separately double the depletable oil quantity from 1,000 to 2,000 barrels. The amendments would apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2026. These upstream tax rules do not establish additional production or lower Midwest regular-gasoline prices.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline price, including Kansas, rather than a Kansas statewide estimate. Crude oil is an input to gasoline; oil-production tax treatment concerns upstream costs without establishing additional output or a pump-price change. Natural gas and higher-ethanol blends are distinct from regular gasoline. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Modification of certain percentage depletion rules with respect to oil and gas wells (a)Percentage depletion rate calculation modified with respect to marginal propertiesSection 613A(c)(6)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: (C)Applicable percentage (i)In generalFor purposes of subparagraph (A), the term applicable percentage means the percentage (not greater than 25 percent) equal to the sum of— (I) 15 percent, plus (II)1 percentage point for each whole dollar by which $70 exceeds the reference price for crude oil for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins. (ii)PPI adjustment (I)In generalIn the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2027, the $70 amount in clause (i)(II) shall be increased by an amount equal to— (aa) such dollar amount, multiplied by (bb)the PPI adjustment factor for such calendar year. (II)PPI adjustment factorFor purposes of subclause (I), the PPI adjustment factor for any calendar year is the percentage (if any) by which— (aa) the PPI for the preceding calendar year, exceeds (bb)the PPI for calendar year 2026. (III)PPI for any calendar yearFor purposes of subclause (II), the PPI for any calendar year is the average of the Producer Price Index for Drilling Oil and Gas Wells, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor, as of the close of the 12-month period ending on August 31 of such calendar year. For purposes of this paragraph, the term reference price means, with respect to any calendar year, the reference price determined for such calendar year under section 45K(d)(2)(C). . (b)Nonapplication of taxable income limitation with respect to marginal propertiesSection 613A(c)(6) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (H)Nonapplication of taxable income limitationWith respect to so much of the allowance for depletion as is determined under subparagraph (A)— (i)subsection (d)(1) shall not apply, and (ii)the second sentence of subsection (a) of section 613 shall not apply.. (c)Depletable oil quantity calculation modifiedSection 613A(c)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 1,000 barrels and inserting 2,000 barrels. (d)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Cindy Holscher

Kansas Senate, District 8 · D–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Cindy Holscher
Kansas Legislature · SB 218

Increasing the Kansas minimum wage of employees.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Sen. Ethan Corson · Sponsored / Sen. Cindy Holscher · Sponsored / Sen. Pat Pettey · Sponsored / Sen. Patrick Schmidt · Sponsored / Sen. Dinah Sykes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 218 proposed a $15 hourly minimum wage for 2026, inflation adjustments from 2027, and an employer-paid tipped wage of at least half the applicable minimum. It would remove the exemption for employers and employees covered by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The bill died in committee; its proposed dates do not mean these wage rates took effect. The employer would still have to make up any shortfall between retained tips plus the employer-paid wage and the full applicable minimum.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Census household money income includes wages and specified cash benefits and is measured before taxes. Tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic. A change in an eligibility calculation does not quantify payments or the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 2. K.S.A. 44-1203 is hereby amended to read as follows: 44- 1203. (a) Except as otherwise provided in the minimum wage and maximum hours law, every employer shall pay to each employee wages at a rate as follows: (1) […] On and after January 1, 2010, and prior to January 1, 2026, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $7.25 […] per hour; (2) on and after January 1, 2026, and prior to January 1, 2027, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $15 per hour; and (3) on and after January 1, 2027, through the end of the year, and on and after January 1 of each successive year, through the end of each year, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than the rate per hour for the immediately preceding year increased by the increase in the cost of living. The increase in the cost of living means an amount equal to the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers in the midwest region as published by the bureau of labor statistics of the United States department of labor during the immediately preceding year rounded to the nearest five cents. (b) In calculating such minimum wage rate, an employer may include tips and gratuities received by an employee if such tips and gratuities have customarily constituted part of the remuneration of the employee and if the employee concerned actually received and retained such tips and gratuities. For employees receiving tips and gratuities, the employer shall pay a minimum wage of at least $2.13 […] per hour prior to January 1, 2026, and at least 50% of the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) on and after January 1, 2026 . If, when combined with the minimum wage rate prescribed in this subsection, the amount of the employee's tips and gratuities are: (1) At least equal to […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a), no further payment is required by the employer; or (2) less than […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) , the employer must pay the employee the difference between […] the minimum wage rate per hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 SB 218 3 prescribed by subsection (a) and the actual hourly amount received by the employee determined by combining the amount of tips and gratuities received by the employee with the minimum wage prescribed by this subsection paid by the employer.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Dinah Sykes

Kansas Senate, District 21 · D–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Dinah Sykes
Kansas Legislature · SB 218

Increasing the Kansas minimum wage of employees.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Sen. Ethan Corson · Sponsored / Sen. Cindy Holscher · Sponsored / Sen. Pat Pettey · Sponsored / Sen. Patrick Schmidt · Sponsored / Sen. Dinah Sykes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 218 proposed a $15 hourly minimum wage for 2026, inflation adjustments from 2027, and an employer-paid tipped wage of at least half the applicable minimum. It would remove the exemption for employers and employees covered by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The bill died in committee; its proposed dates do not mean these wage rates took effect. The employer would still have to make up any shortfall between retained tips plus the employer-paid wage and the full applicable minimum.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Census household money income includes wages and specified cash benefits and is measured before taxes. Tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic. A change in an eligibility calculation does not quantify payments or the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 2. K.S.A. 44-1203 is hereby amended to read as follows: 44- 1203. (a) Except as otherwise provided in the minimum wage and maximum hours law, every employer shall pay to each employee wages at a rate as follows: (1) […] On and after January 1, 2010, and prior to January 1, 2026, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $7.25 […] per hour; (2) on and after January 1, 2026, and prior to January 1, 2027, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $15 per hour; and (3) on and after January 1, 2027, through the end of the year, and on and after January 1 of each successive year, through the end of each year, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than the rate per hour for the immediately preceding year increased by the increase in the cost of living. The increase in the cost of living means an amount equal to the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers in the midwest region as published by the bureau of labor statistics of the United States department of labor during the immediately preceding year rounded to the nearest five cents. (b) In calculating such minimum wage rate, an employer may include tips and gratuities received by an employee if such tips and gratuities have customarily constituted part of the remuneration of the employee and if the employee concerned actually received and retained such tips and gratuities. For employees receiving tips and gratuities, the employer shall pay a minimum wage of at least $2.13 […] per hour prior to January 1, 2026, and at least 50% of the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) on and after January 1, 2026 . If, when combined with the minimum wage rate prescribed in this subsection, the amount of the employee's tips and gratuities are: (1) At least equal to […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a), no further payment is required by the employer; or (2) less than […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) , the employer must pay the employee the difference between […] the minimum wage rate per hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 SB 218 3 prescribed by subsection (a) and the actual hourly amount received by the employee determined by combining the amount of tips and gratuities received by the employee with the minimum wage prescribed by this subsection paid by the employer.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Ethan Corson

Kansas Senate, District 7 · D–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Ethan Corson
Kansas Legislature · SB 218

Increasing the Kansas minimum wage of employees.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Sen. Ethan Corson · Sponsored / Sen. Cindy Holscher · Sponsored / Sen. Pat Pettey · Sponsored / Sen. Patrick Schmidt · Sponsored / Sen. Dinah Sykes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 218 proposed a $15 hourly minimum wage for 2026, inflation adjustments from 2027, and an employer-paid tipped wage of at least half the applicable minimum. It would remove the exemption for employers and employees covered by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The bill died in committee; its proposed dates do not mean these wage rates took effect. The employer would still have to make up any shortfall between retained tips plus the employer-paid wage and the full applicable minimum.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Census household money income includes wages and specified cash benefits and is measured before taxes. Tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic. A change in an eligibility calculation does not quantify payments or the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 2. K.S.A. 44-1203 is hereby amended to read as follows: 44- 1203. (a) Except as otherwise provided in the minimum wage and maximum hours law, every employer shall pay to each employee wages at a rate as follows: (1) […] On and after January 1, 2010, and prior to January 1, 2026, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $7.25 […] per hour; (2) on and after January 1, 2026, and prior to January 1, 2027, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $15 per hour; and (3) on and after January 1, 2027, through the end of the year, and on and after January 1 of each successive year, through the end of each year, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than the rate per hour for the immediately preceding year increased by the increase in the cost of living. The increase in the cost of living means an amount equal to the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers in the midwest region as published by the bureau of labor statistics of the United States department of labor during the immediately preceding year rounded to the nearest five cents. (b) In calculating such minimum wage rate, an employer may include tips and gratuities received by an employee if such tips and gratuities have customarily constituted part of the remuneration of the employee and if the employee concerned actually received and retained such tips and gratuities. For employees receiving tips and gratuities, the employer shall pay a minimum wage of at least $2.13 […] per hour prior to January 1, 2026, and at least 50% of the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) on and after January 1, 2026 . If, when combined with the minimum wage rate prescribed in this subsection, the amount of the employee's tips and gratuities are: (1) At least equal to […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a), no further payment is required by the employer; or (2) less than […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) , the employer must pay the employee the difference between […] the minimum wage rate per hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 SB 218 3 prescribed by subsection (a) and the actual hourly amount received by the employee determined by combining the amount of tips and gratuities received by the employee with the minimum wage prescribed by this subsection paid by the employer.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Pat Pettey

Kansas Senate, District 6 · D–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Pat Pettey
Kansas Legislature · SB 218

Increasing the Kansas minimum wage of employees.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Sen. Ethan Corson · Sponsored / Sen. Cindy Holscher · Sponsored / Sen. Pat Pettey · Sponsored / Sen. Patrick Schmidt · Sponsored / Sen. Dinah Sykes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 218 proposed a $15 hourly minimum wage for 2026, inflation adjustments from 2027, and an employer-paid tipped wage of at least half the applicable minimum. It would remove the exemption for employers and employees covered by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The bill died in committee; its proposed dates do not mean these wage rates took effect. The employer would still have to make up any shortfall between retained tips plus the employer-paid wage and the full applicable minimum.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Census household money income includes wages and specified cash benefits and is measured before taxes. Tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic. A change in an eligibility calculation does not quantify payments or the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 2. K.S.A. 44-1203 is hereby amended to read as follows: 44- 1203. (a) Except as otherwise provided in the minimum wage and maximum hours law, every employer shall pay to each employee wages at a rate as follows: (1) […] On and after January 1, 2010, and prior to January 1, 2026, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $7.25 […] per hour; (2) on and after January 1, 2026, and prior to January 1, 2027, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $15 per hour; and (3) on and after January 1, 2027, through the end of the year, and on and after January 1 of each successive year, through the end of each year, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than the rate per hour for the immediately preceding year increased by the increase in the cost of living. The increase in the cost of living means an amount equal to the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers in the midwest region as published by the bureau of labor statistics of the United States department of labor during the immediately preceding year rounded to the nearest five cents. (b) In calculating such minimum wage rate, an employer may include tips and gratuities received by an employee if such tips and gratuities have customarily constituted part of the remuneration of the employee and if the employee concerned actually received and retained such tips and gratuities. For employees receiving tips and gratuities, the employer shall pay a minimum wage of at least $2.13 […] per hour prior to January 1, 2026, and at least 50% of the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) on and after January 1, 2026 . If, when combined with the minimum wage rate prescribed in this subsection, the amount of the employee's tips and gratuities are: (1) At least equal to […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a), no further payment is required by the employer; or (2) less than […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) , the employer must pay the employee the difference between […] the minimum wage rate per hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 SB 218 3 prescribed by subsection (a) and the actual hourly amount received by the employee determined by combining the amount of tips and gratuities received by the employee with the minimum wage prescribed by this subsection paid by the employer.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Patrick Schmidt

Kansas Senate, District 19 · D–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Patrick Schmidt
Kansas Legislature · SB 218

Increasing the Kansas minimum wage of employees.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Sen. Ethan Corson · Sponsored / Sen. Cindy Holscher · Sponsored / Sen. Pat Pettey · Sponsored / Sen. Patrick Schmidt · Sponsored / Sen. Dinah Sykes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 218 proposed a $15 hourly minimum wage for 2026, inflation adjustments from 2027, and an employer-paid tipped wage of at least half the applicable minimum. It would remove the exemption for employers and employees covered by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The bill died in committee; its proposed dates do not mean these wage rates took effect. The employer would still have to make up any shortfall between retained tips plus the employer-paid wage and the full applicable minimum.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Census household money income includes wages and specified cash benefits and is measured before taxes. Tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic. A change in an eligibility calculation does not quantify payments or the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 2. K.S.A. 44-1203 is hereby amended to read as follows: 44- 1203. (a) Except as otherwise provided in the minimum wage and maximum hours law, every employer shall pay to each employee wages at a rate as follows: (1) […] On and after January 1, 2010, and prior to January 1, 2026, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $7.25 […] per hour; (2) on and after January 1, 2026, and prior to January 1, 2027, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than $15 per hour; and (3) on and after January 1, 2027, through the end of the year, and on and after January 1 of each successive year, through the end of each year, employee wages shall be paid at a rate of not less than the rate per hour for the immediately preceding year increased by the increase in the cost of living. The increase in the cost of living means an amount equal to the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers in the midwest region as published by the bureau of labor statistics of the United States department of labor during the immediately preceding year rounded to the nearest five cents. (b) In calculating such minimum wage rate, an employer may include tips and gratuities received by an employee if such tips and gratuities have customarily constituted part of the remuneration of the employee and if the employee concerned actually received and retained such tips and gratuities. For employees receiving tips and gratuities, the employer shall pay a minimum wage of at least $2.13 […] per hour prior to January 1, 2026, and at least 50% of the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) on and after January 1, 2026 . If, when combined with the minimum wage rate prescribed in this subsection, the amount of the employee's tips and gratuities are: (1) At least equal to […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a), no further payment is required by the employer; or (2) less than […] the minimum wage rate per hour prescribed by subsection (a) , the employer must pay the employee the difference between […] the minimum wage rate per hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 SB 218 3 prescribed by subsection (a) and the actual hourly amount received by the employee determined by combining the amount of tips and gratuities received by the employee with the minimum wage prescribed by this subsection paid by the employer.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.