Iowa · individual fact

Iowa unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate3.2%2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents1,655,3822024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer1.3%2025 · 11-month average · #28 of 50 · highest first

Iowa over time

Explore Iowa readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Iowa officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Iowa effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Iowa change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Iowa · source units
IowaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 3.2%1.6%3.9%6.2%Iowa, 2015: 3.7%Iowa, 2016: 3.6%Iowa, 2017: 3.1%Iowa, 2018: 2.6%Iowa, 2019: 2.7%Iowa, 2020: 5.2%Iowa, 2021: 3.9%Iowa, 2022: 2.9%Iowa, 2023: 3%Iowa, 2024: 3.2%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 32Iowa · Iowa directs a work-based learning clearinghouse · 2018-01-29Iowa work-based learningIowa · Iowa establishes a flood recovery advisory board · 2019-04-15Iowa flood recovery boardNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidIowa · Iowa establishes a pandemic recovery advisory board · 2020-06-18Iowa pandemic recovery boardNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationIowa · Iowa establishes a child care and workforce task force · 2021-03-10Iowa child care task forceNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesIowa · Iowa approves income-tax and local-finance changes · 2024-05-01Iowa tax and finance lawIowa · Iowa amends work-based learning governance and rescinds older orders · 2024-06-06Iowa executive-order amendmentsNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementIowa · Iowa renews its STEM advisory council · 2025-08-17Iowa STEM advisory councilIowa · Iowa DOGE task force submits its advisory report · 2025-09-29Iowa DOGE report submittedNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapIowa · Iowa directs professional-license and state-hiring eligibility checks · 2025-10-08Iowa licensing and state hiringNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresIowa · Iowa establishes a nuclear energy advisory task force · 2026-01-05Iowa nuclear energy task forceIowa · Iowa approves nuclear incentives and a university workforce fund · 2026-06-01Iowa nuclear lawIowa · Iowa approves an omnibus law with six item vetoes · 2026-06-02Iowa omnibus approvalIowa · Iowa establishes an Office of Outdoor Recreation · 2026-06-08Iowa outdoor recreation officeIowa · Iowa’s judicial-compensation framework takes effect · 2026-06-19Iowa judicial pay frameworkIowa · Iowa omnibus school, sanitation and workforce provisions take effect · 2026-07-01Iowa July provisionsIowa · Iowa’s nuclear tax incentive and workforce-fund law takes effect · 2026-07-01Iowa nuclear incentive startsIowa · Iowa publishes its nuclear energy task force report · 2026-09-03Iowa nuclear report releasedNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Iowa Legislature · 53● U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · 2◆ Governor · 153■ Iowa agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2015-12-012026-09-30

22 of 22 reviewed Iowa actions match · 18 date markers shown. 32 major events shown separately.

Iowa · 2024: 3.2% · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Iowa Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodIowaRankU.S. benchmark
20243.2%#34 of 504%
20233%#31 of 50Not available
20222.9%#35 of 50Not available
20213.9%#34 of 50Not available
20205.2%#45 of 50Not available
20192.7%#43 of 50Not available
20182.6%#46 of 50Not available
20173.1%#42 of 50Not available
20163.6%#42 of 50Not available
20153.7%#42 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Iowa · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Iowa · 20243.2%
Iowa rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Annual unemployment rate history in Iowa2.2%3.9%5.6%20152024
2024 · Iowa: 3.2% · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodIowaCompare
20153.7%
20163.6%
20173.1%
20182.6%
20192.7%
20205.2%
20213.9%
20222.9%
20233%
20243.2%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 3.2%2024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa · your comparison3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Iowa · 2025 · 11-month average1.3%
Iowa rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 1.3%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa · your comparison1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Iowa · 2025-0.4%
Iowa rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Annual real GDP growth history in Iowa-3.5%2.7%8.9%20152025
2025 · Iowa: -0.4% · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodIowaCompare
20153.1%
20160.4%
20170.2%
20181.1%
2019-0.4%
2020-1.7%
20217.4%
20221.7%
20230.6%
20241.1%
2025-0.4%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · -0.4%2025 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa · your comparison-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Iowa · December 202557,000
Iowa rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Openings · number history in Iowa-1,009,9503,613,5008,236,950July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Iowa: 57,000 · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Openings · number history
PeriodIowaCompare
July 202566,000
August 202563,000
September 202565,000
October 202559,000
November 202559,000
December 202557,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 57,000December 2025 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa · your comparison57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Iowa candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

30 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Iowa Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Nate Willems

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · IA

Jobs & workforce context

A direct line for Iowa workers to report wage theft to the Attorney General's Office — through a hotline or online intake form routed straight to an attorney or investigator. Workers would finally have a partner in these disputes beyond hiring a private attorney just to get their own wages back.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology, privacy, and online safety

Candidate campaign source

A direct line for Iowa workers to report wage theft to the Attorney General's Office — through a hotline or online intake form routed straight to an attorney or investigator. Workers would finally have a partner in these disputes beyond hiring a private attorney just to get their own wages back.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nate Willems — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Iowa Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 15 statements

Dave Muhlbauer

8 statements

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · IA

Jobs & workforce context

Expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs : In small towns, we live and die by each person and family that stays or rejoins. As State Auditor, I started the Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs program, allowing employees of the Auditor’s Office to move to rural communities instead of forcing them to live in …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs : In small towns, we live and die by each person and family that stays or rejoins. As State Auditor, I started the Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs program, allowing employees of the Auditor’s Office to move to rural communities instead of forcing them to live in Des Moines, Ames, or Iowa City. We shouldn’t force employees to live in Iowa’s most prosperous cities when we do work in all 99 counties. As governor, I would expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs to the government workforce for jobs that can be done anywhere in Iowa, to support economic opportunities in small towns and rural areas.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
View 7 more statements from Dave Muhlbauer
Jobs & workforce context

Require investments in Iowa’s workforce : Good paying jobs are only good if they don’t increase costs or problems for other Iowans who are already here. As governor, I’d require new construction of data centers to be built by Iowa union workers that uphold job site quality standards, offer good wage…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Require investments in Iowa’s workforce : Good paying jobs are only good if they don’t increase costs or problems for other Iowans who are already here. As governor, I’d require new construction of data centers to be built by Iowa union workers that uphold job site quality standards, offer good wages for workers, and make investments in local workforce development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 9 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Invest in digester technology: Right now, any manure decomposing freely releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and nitrates from a form that is hard to predict due to weather, and hard to haul. Digesters control that breakdown in a controlled environment, capturing methane to be sold to renewabl…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Invest in digester technology: Right now, any manure decomposing freely releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and nitrates from a form that is hard to predict due to weather, and hard to haul. Digesters control that breakdown in a controlled environment, capturing methane to be sold to renewable natural gas companies and turning nitrate into a different form, still for use as fertilizer but less likely to wash into rivers and streams. If you’ve heard of a closed-loop system that reuses materials, this is a pretty good one. Funding these efforts could help improve water quality, create jobs, including in the trucking industry, and bring more money to farmers. This is particularly timely with ongoing disruptions to the foreign fertilizer market, leaving our farmers in limbo ahead of planting. Digesters gives us a domestic source for fertilizer, lowering costs for farmers while tackling the water quality crisis head-on.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 7 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Create jobs: Legalizing adult-use cannabis would create new opportunities for small business owners in Iowa. Using data from other states with legal adult-use cannabis, it’s estimated to create around 7,000 jobs .

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Create jobs: Legalizing adult-use cannabis would create new opportunities for small business owners in Iowa. Using data from other states with legal adult-use cannabis, it’s estimated to create around 7,000 jobs .

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 6 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs: In small towns, we live and die by each person and family that stays or rejoins. As State Auditor, I started the Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs program, allowing employees of the Auditor’s Office to move to rural communities instead of forcing them to live in D…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Truer Better Agenda: Opportunities for All

Candidate campaign source

Expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs: In small towns, we live and die by each person and family that stays or rejoins. As State Auditor, I started the Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs program, allowing employees of the Auditor’s Office to move to rural communities instead of forcing them to live in Des Moines, Ames, or Iowa City. We shouldn’t force employees to live in Iowa’s most prosperous cities when we do work in all 99 counties. As governor, I would expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs to the government workforce for jobs that can be done anywhere in Iowa, to support economic opportunities in small towns and rural areas.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (C…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (Choose Iowa, Farm to School, USDA’s LAMP programs, Resilient Food System Infrastructure Fund, Iowa Economic Development Programs) to maximize efforts to grow food that can be consumed locally. Think farm to school, farm to hospital, farm to prison, farm to food bank. The federal government had a local food purchasing agreement program, but the program was cut. As governor, I’d model the former federal policy to the state level, and establish regional food business centers, a division tasked with advocating and assisting farmers with things like technical assistance and market development to boost the supply chain and support local job growth. Tax dollars from schools, hospitals, and jails go to feed people every day; the more that can get spent locally, the longer that money circulates in our local economies, and the more vitality we have outside of our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Invest in Iowa’s economy and workforce:

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Invest in Iowa’s economy and workforce:

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Here’s the bottom line: as governor, I will make sure anyone building in Iowa is contributing to Iowa, not extracting from us. They should be paying full freight and carrying their own weight, not raising your costs for anything, and respecting those who were already here. If they accept those terms…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: My Plan to Hold Big Corporations and Data Centers Accountable

Candidate campaign source

Here’s the bottom line: as governor, I will make sure anyone building in Iowa is contributing to Iowa, not extracting from us. They should be paying full freight and carrying their own weight, not raising your costs for anything, and respecting those who were already here. If they accept those terms, then they can put downward pressure on your taxes and bring in good-paying jobs, both of which are wins for our state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 9 ↗

Rob Sand

7 statements

Democratic · Governor · IA

Jobs & workforce context

Expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs: In small towns, we live and die by each person and family that stays or rejoins. As State Auditor, I started the Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs program, allowing employees of the Auditor’s Office to move to rural communities instead of forcing them to live in D…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Rural economic development

Candidate campaign source

Expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs: In small towns, we live and die by each person and family that stays or rejoins. As State Auditor, I started the Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs program, allowing employees of the Auditor’s Office to move to rural communities instead of forcing them to live in Des Moines, Ames, or Iowa City. We shouldn’t force employees to live in Iowa’s most prosperous cities when we do work in all 99 counties. As governor, I would expand Statewide Work, Statewide Jobs to the government workforce for jobs that can be done anywhere in Iowa, to support economic opportunities in small towns and rural areas.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
View 6 more statements from Rob Sand
Jobs & workforce context

It’s time to restore the slogan on Iowa’s quarter: “foundation in education.” New investments and initiatives, like universal all day pre-K, are needed to give our students the edge they need to compete for good paying jobs. Iowa’s private school voucher program takes resources away from public scho…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

It’s time to restore the slogan on Iowa’s quarter: “foundation in education.” New investments and initiatives, like universal all day pre-K, are needed to give our students the edge they need to compete for good paying jobs. Iowa’s private school voucher program takes resources away from public schools, and has no accountability for how that money is being spent. We can pay for universal pre-K by no longer sending our taxpayer dollars to Iowa’s wealthiest families to pay for the private school tuition they were going to pay on their own anyway. As Governor, Rob will fight to bring more oversight over the hundreds of millions of dollars being spent each year on vouchers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Require investments in Iowa’s workforce: Good paying jobs are only good if they don’t increase costs or problems for other Iowans who are already here. As governor, I’d require new construction of data centers to be built by Iowa union workers that uphold job site quality standards, offer good wages…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Require investments in Iowa’s workforce: Good paying jobs are only good if they don’t increase costs or problems for other Iowans who are already here. As governor, I’d require new construction of data centers to be built by Iowa union workers that uphold job site quality standards, offer good wages for workers, and make investments in local workforce development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (C…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (Choose Iowa, Farm to School, USDA’s LAMP programs, Resilient Food System Infrastructure Fund, Iowa Economic Development Programs) to maximize efforts to grow food that can be consumed locally. Think farm to school, farm to hospital, farm to prison, farm to food bank. The federal government had a local food purchasing agreement program, but the program was cut. As governor, I’d model the former federal policy to the state level, and establish regional food business centers, a division tasked with advocating and assisting farmers with things like technical assistance and market development to boost the supply chain and support local job growth. Tax dollars from schools, hospitals, and jails go to feed people every day; the more that can get spent locally, the longer that money circulates in our local economies, and the more vitality we have outside of our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Invest in digester technology: Right now, any manure decomposing freely releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and nitrates from a form that is hard to predict due to weather, and hard to haul. Digesters control that breakdown in a controlled environment, capturing methane to be sold to renewabl…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Invest in digester technology: Right now, any manure decomposing freely releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and nitrates from a form that is hard to predict due to weather, and hard to haul. Digesters control that breakdown in a controlled environment, capturing methane to be sold to renewable natural gas companies and turning nitrate into a different form, still for use as fertilizer but less likely to wash into rivers and streams. If you’ve heard of a closed-loop system that reuses materials, this is a pretty good one. Funding these efforts could help improve water quality, create jobs, including in the trucking industry, and bring more money to farmers. This is particularly timely with ongoing disruptions to the foreign fertilizer market, leaving our farmers in limbo ahead of planting. Digesters gives us a domestic source for fertilizer, lowering costs for farmers while tackling the water quality crisis head-on.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Create jobs: Legalizing adult-use cannabis would create new opportunities for small business owners in Iowa. Using data from other states with legal adult-use cannabis, it’s estimated to create around 7,000 jobs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cannabis and drug policy

Candidate campaign source

Create jobs: Legalizing adult-use cannabis would create new opportunities for small business owners in Iowa. Using data from other states with legal adult-use cannabis, it’s estimated to create around 7,000 jobs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Here’s the bottom line: as governor, I will make sure anyone building in Iowa is contributing to Iowa, not extracting from us. They should be paying full freight and carrying their own weight, not raising your costs for anything, and respecting those who were already here. If they accept those terms…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Here’s the bottom line: as governor, I will make sure anyone building in Iowa is contributing to Iowa, not extracting from us. They should be paying full freight and carrying their own weight, not raising your costs for anything, and respecting those who were already here. If they accept those terms, then they can put downward pressure on your taxes and bring in good-paying jobs, both of which are wins for our state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗

2026 Iowa U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · IA

Jobs & workforce context

Expand Career and Technical Education (CTE) so that students can find good-paying jobs in the trades or manufacturing

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Expand Career and Technical Education (CTE) so that students can find good-paying jobs in the trades or manufacturing

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Iowa candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Iowa incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Iowa legislators and Iowa’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Iowa’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Iowa incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. Chuck Grassley

U.S. Senate, Iowa · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Chuck Grassley
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 560

EAGLES Act of 2025

Feb 13, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Chuck Grassley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 560 would expand the Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center functions for research, training, consultation and information sharing to prevent targeted violence, including a school-violence program. Targeted assaults overlap a subset of violent offenses; the relationship does not equate every threat with a reported violent crime. The proposed section ends September 30, 2030, and its funds may not be used for firearms-use training.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. The center’s functions concern prevention of targeted violence, including school violence. Only overlapping violent offenses relate to the FBI crime measure; research, training and threats are not themselves counted crimes. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3056B.Functions of the National Threat Assessment Center of the United States Secret Service(a)In generalThere is established a National Threat Assessment Center (in this section referred to as the Center), to be operated by the United States Secret Service, at the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security.(b)FunctionsThe functions of the Center shall include the following:(1)Training and education in the area of best practices on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence.(2)Consultation on complex threat assessment cases and programs.(3)Research on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence, consistent with evidence-based standards and existing laws and regulations.(4)Facilitation of information sharing on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence among agencies and organizations with protective or public safety responsibilities, as well as other public or private entities.(5)Development of evidence-based programs to promote the standardization of Federal, State, and local threat assessments and best practices for the prevention of targeted violence.(c)Safe school initiativeIn carrying out the functions described in subsection (b), the Center shall establish a national program on targeted school violence prevention, focusing on the following activities:(1)ResearchThe Center shall—(A)conduct research into targeted school violence and evidence-based practices in targeted school violence prevention, including school threat assessment; and(B)publish the findings of the Center on the public website of the United States Secret Service and on the School Safety Clearinghouse website, known as www.SchoolSafety.gov.(2)Training(A)In generalThe Center shall develop and offer training courses on targeted school violence prevention to agencies with protective or public safety responsibilities and other public or private entities, including local educational agencies.(B)PlanNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Center shall establish a plan to offer its training and other educational resources to public or private entities within each State.(3)Coordination with other Federal agenciesThe Center shall develop research and training programs under this section in coordination with the Department of Justice, the Department of Education, and the Department of Health and Human Services.(4)Consultation with entities outside the Federal GovernmentThe Center is authorized to consult with State and local educational, law enforcement, and mental health officials and private entities in the development of research and training programs under this section.(5)Interactive websiteThe Center may create an interactive website to disseminate information and data on evidence-based practices in targeted school violence prevention.(d)Hiring of additional personnelThe Director of the United States Secret Service may hire additional personnel to comply with the requirements of this section, which, if the Director exercises such authority, shall include—(1)at least 1 employee with expertise in child psychological development; and(2)at least 1 employee with expertise in school threat assessment. (e)Report to CongressNot later than two years after the date of enactment of this section, the Director of the United States Secret Service shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Education and Workforce, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report on actions taken by the United States Secret Service to implement provisions of this section, which shall include information relating to the following:(1)The number of employees hired (on a full-time equivalent basis).(2)The number of individuals in each State trained in threat assessment.(3)The number of school districts in each State trained in school threat assessment or targeted school violence prevention.(4)Information on Federal, State, and local agencies trained or otherwise assisted by the Center.(5)A formal evaluation indicating whether the training and other assistance provided by the Center is effective.(6)A formal evaluation indicating whether the training and other assistance provided by the Center was implemented by the school.(7)A summary of the Center’s research activities and findings.(8)A strategic plan for disseminating the Center’s educational and training resources to each State.(f)Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.(g)No funds To provide firearms trainingAmounts made available to carry out this section may not be used to train any person in the use of a firearm.(h)No effect on other lawsNothing in this section may be construed to preclude or contradict any other provision of law authorizing training in the use of firearms.(i)TerminationThis section shall terminate on September 30, 2030.(j)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Evidence-basedThe term evidence-based means—(A)strong evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented experimental study;(B)moderate evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented quasi-experimental study; or(C)promising evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias.(2)Local educational agencyThe term local educational agency has the meaning given such term under section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).(3)StateThe term State means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Joni Ernst

U.S. Senate, Iowa · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Joni Ernst
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 1761

Ending Unemployment Payments to Jobless Millionaires Act of 2025

May 14, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Joni Ernst · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 1761 would bar federal unemployment-benefit payments and related administrative spending for claimants with at least $1 million in base-period wages, with certification, verification and recovery requirements. The proposal concerns a cash-income component for a narrowly defined group, not a change in Iowa’s measured median income.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2. Ending unemployment payments to jobless millionaires (a) Prohibition on use of Federal funds (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be used— (A) to make payments of unemployment compensation benefits under an unemployment compensation program of the United States in a year to an individual whose wages during the individual’s base period are equal to or exceed $1,000,000; or (B) for any administrative costs associated with making payments described in subparagraph (A). (2) Compliance (A) Self-certification Any application for unemployment compensation under an unemployment compensation program of the United States shall include a form or procedure for an individual applicant to certify that such individual’s wages during the individual’s base period do not equal or exceed $1,000,000. (B) Verification Each State agency that is responsible for administering any unemployment compensation program of the United States shall utilize available systems to verify wage eligibility by assessing claimant income to the degree possible. (3) Audits The certifications required by paragraph (2) shall be auditable by the Department of Labor or the Government Accountability Office. (4) Recovery of overpayments Each State agency that is responsible for administering any unemployment compensation program of the United States shall require individuals who have received amounts of unemployment compensation under such a program to which they were not entitled to repay such amounts. (5) Effective date The prohibition under paragraph (1) shall apply to weeks of unemployment beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Prohibition on imposing limits on States The Secretary of Labor shall not promulgate any regulation or issue any guidance that would limit a State’s ability to disqualify an individual from receiving unemployment compensation on the basis that such individual has wages during the individual’s base period that are equal or exceed $1,000,000. (c) Unemployment compensation program of the United States defined In this section, the term unemployment compensation program of the United States means— (1) unemployment compensation for Federal civilian employees under subchapter I of chapter 85 of title 5, United States Code; (2) unemployment compensation for ex-servicemembers under subchapter II of chapter 85 of title 5, United States Code; (3) extended benefits under the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note); (4) any Federal temporary extension of unemployment compensation; (5) any Federal program that increases the weekly amount of unemployment compensation payable to individuals; and (6) any other Federal program providing for the payment of unemployment compensation, as determined by the Secretary of Labor.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Iowa officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Iowa statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.