Iowa · individual fact

Iowa income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Iowa’s tax structure.

Median household income$75.06K2020–2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$40.88K2020–2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$60.14K2024 · #18 of 50 · highest first

Iowa over time

Explore Iowa readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Iowa officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Iowa effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Iowa change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Iowa · source units
IowaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $60,144$46.16K$53.9K$61.64KIowa, 2014: $50,001Iowa, 2015: $52,254Iowa, 2016: $52,065Iowa, 2017: $52,544Iowa, 2018: $52,172Iowa, 2019: $52,372Iowa, 2020: $55,696Iowa, 2021: $59,666Iowa, 2022: $59,743Iowa, 2023: $58,646Iowa, 2024: $60,144201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 44National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefIowa · Iowa establishes a child care and workforce task force · 2021-03-10Iowa child care task forceNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsIowa · Iowa approves income-tax and local-finance changes · 2024-05-01Iowa tax and finance lawIowa · Iowa’s 3.8% individual income-tax rate begins · 2025-01-01Iowa 3.8% income taxNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessIowa · Iowa’s revised local levy formulas begin applying · 2025-07-01Iowa local levy formulasNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingIowa · Iowa approves nuclear incentives and a university workforce fund · 2026-06-01Iowa nuclear lawIowa · Iowa approves an omnibus law with six item vetoes · 2026-06-02Iowa omnibus approvalIowa · Iowa’s judicial-compensation framework takes effect · 2026-06-19Iowa judicial pay frameworkIowa · Iowa omnibus school, sanitation and workforce provisions take effect · 2026-07-01Iowa July provisionsIowa · Iowa’s nuclear tax incentive and workforce-fund law takes effect · 2026-07-01Iowa nuclear incentive startsNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Iowa Legislature · 72● U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · 5◆ Governor · 82■ Iowa agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

20 of 20 reviewed Iowa actions match · 18 date markers shown. 44 major events shown separately.

Iowa · 2024: $60,144 · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Iowa Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodIowaRankU.S. benchmark
2024$60,144#18 of 50$59,195
2023$58,646#19 of 50$58,088
2022$59,743#12 of 50$57,104
2021$59,666#19 of 50$59,365
2020$55,696#23 of 50$56,514
2019$52,372#23 of 50$53,683
2018$52,172#21 of 50$52,242
2017$52,544#19 of 50$51,006
2016$52,065#17 of 50$49,828
2015$52,254#14 of 50$49,396
2014$50,001#18 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Iowa · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Iowa · 2020–2024$75,059
Iowa rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · $75,0592020–2024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $74,641 – $75,477Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa · your comparison$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$75,0592020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Iowa households, expressed in inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Additional household measure

People below the poverty threshold
11.3%
Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.

  • Household income is not take-home pay and does not directly account for taxes, benefits, household size, debt, or regional cost differences.
  • The poverty measure and income estimate are multi-year survey measures, not current economic forecasts.
Iowa · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Iowa · 2024$60,144
Iowa rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Real personal income per person history in Iowa$45.79K$53.9K$62.02K20142024
2024 · Iowa: $60,144 · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Real personal income per person history
PeriodIowaCompare
2014$50,001
2015$52,254
2016$52,065
2017$52,544
2018$52,172
2019$52,372
2020$55,696
2021$59,666
2022$59,743
2023$58,646
2024$60,144

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · $60,1442024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa · your comparison$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

How Iowa raises taxes

All levels of Iowa taxable individual income are subject to a 3.8% flat rate for tax year 2026. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Iowa · FY2024$3.76B
Iowa rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · $3.76BFY2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa · your comparison$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Iowa income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Iowa ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Iowa candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

64 statements from 16 candidates

2026 Iowa Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 6 statements

Nate Willems

6 statements

Democratic · Attorney General · IA

Income & wages

Cracking Down On Repeat Offenders to Stop Wage Theft: Willems will work with prosecutors to pursue criminal charges against bad actors, not just civil penalties — sending a clear message that stealing wages is a crime.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Cracking Down On Repeat Offenders to Stop Wage Theft: Willems will work with prosecutors to pursue criminal charges against bad actors, not just civil penalties — sending a clear message that stealing wages is a crime.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nate Willems — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 5 more statements from Nate Willems
Income & wages

Creating a Dedicated Wage Theft Recovery Unit: Willems will establish a first-of-its-kind unit inside the Iowa Attorney General's office with dedicated staff focused solely on investigating employers who repeatedly ignore labor laws, including stealing wages, misclassifying workers, and more. The un…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Creating a Dedicated Wage Theft Recovery Unit: Willems will establish a first-of-its-kind unit inside the Iowa Attorney General's office with dedicated staff focused solely on investigating employers who repeatedly ignore labor laws, including stealing wages, misclassifying workers, and more. The unit would use enforcement tools that already exist under Iowa law, meaning it can be stood up immediately, without waiting on the legislature to act.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nate Willems — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Income & wages

A direct line for Iowa workers to report wage theft to the Attorney General's Office — through a hotline or online intake form routed straight to an attorney or investigator. Workers would finally have a partner in these disputes beyond hiring a private attorney just to get their own wages back.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology, privacy, and online safety

Candidate campaign source

A direct line for Iowa workers to report wage theft to the Attorney General's Office — through a hotline or online intake form routed straight to an attorney or investigator. Workers would finally have a partner in these disputes beyond hiring a private attorney just to get their own wages back.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nate Willems — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

Nate Willems' plan to crack down on wage theft, hold greedy corporations accountable, and make sure Iowans keep their hard-earned money.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Nate Willems' plan to crack down on wage theft, hold greedy corporations accountable, and make sure Iowans keep their hard-earned money.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nate Willems — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

Enforcement focused on corporations who intentionally break the rules or ignore repeated warnings. The office would catalog violations, work with other state agencies to monitor repeat offenders, and pursue criminal charges against bad actors — not just civil penalties — sending a clear message that…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Enforcement focused on corporations who intentionally break the rules or ignore repeated warnings. The office would catalog violations, work with other state agencies to monitor repeat offenders, and pursue criminal charges against bad actors — not just civil penalties — sending a clear message that stealing wages is a crime.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nate Willems — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Income & wages

Partnering With Private Attorneys, Unions, and Legal Aid to Reach More Workers: The unit would work directly with Iowa's unions, legal aid organizations, and private attorneys already handling wage claims, expanding the office's reach without waiting to build capacity from scratch.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Partnering With Private Attorneys, Unions, and Legal Aid to Reach More Workers: The unit would work directly with Iowa's unions, legal aid organizations, and private attorneys already handling wage claims, expanding the office's reach without waiting to build capacity from scratch.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nate Willems — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Iowa Auditor of State — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Taylor Wettach

1 statement

Democratic · Auditor of State · IA

Taxes & tax policy

Today, too many Iowans stretched thin by health care, housing, utilities, food, and child care costs – and the last thing they should have to worry about is whether their tax dollars are being wasted, misused, or diverted. Instead of making life better for Iowans, some politicians are rigging the sy…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Why I'm Running

Candidate campaign source

Today, too many Iowans stretched thin by health care, housing, utilities, food, and child care costs – and the last thing they should have to worry about is whether their tax dollars are being wasted, misused, or diverted. Instead of making life better for Iowans, some politicians are rigging the system to face fewer questions, less oversight, and getting rid of accountability to the people they are meant to serve.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Taylor Wettach — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Iowa Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 29 statements

Dave Muhlbauer

18 statements

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · IA

Taxes & tax policy

Rob Sand’s Plan to Legalize, Tax, and Regulate Adult-use Cannabis

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Rob Sand’s Plan to Legalize, Tax, and Regulate Adult-use Cannabis

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 6 ↗
View 17 more statements from Dave Muhlbauer
Taxes & tax policy

Legalize and regulate adult-use cannabis like alcohol: Right now, alcohol is regulated under the Alcoholic Beverages Division. As governor, Rob would add cannabis experts to the already-existing division to be charged with regulating the cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and sale of cannabis…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Rob Sand’s Plan to Legalize, Tax, and Regulate Adult-use Cannabis

Candidate campaign source

Legalize and regulate adult-use cannabis like alcohol: Right now, alcohol is regulated under the Alcoholic Beverages Division. As governor, Rob would add cannabis experts to the already-existing division to be charged with regulating the cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and sale of cannabis. These experts would implement age restrictions, quality and safety standards, and taxation similar to how alcohol is regulated in the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 6 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Making the Public Innovations and Efficiencies (PIE) program mandatory across government agencies : We launched this program in the Auditor’s Office, and it’s been a huge success in saving tax dollars – so much so that the Republican State Auditor of Mississippi copied it. If I’m governor, I’d make …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Making the Public Innovations and Efficiencies (PIE) program mandatory across government agencies : We launched this program in the Auditor’s Office, and it’s been a huge success in saving tax dollars – so much so that the Republican State Auditor of Mississippi copied it. If I’m governor, I’d make this program mandatory for all government agencies to ensure tax dollars are being used as efficiently as possible across the state. Plus, the award is an actual pie, and who doesn’t love pie?

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

End tax breaks for data centers : Right now, we face a nearly $1.4 billion budget deficit. We shouldn’t be handing out more tax breaks for major corporations at the expense of Iowa taxpayers. These data centers are also getting huge sales tax breaks on everything inside the data center. That’s milli…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

End tax breaks for data centers : Right now, we face a nearly $1.4 billion budget deficit. We shouldn’t be handing out more tax breaks for major corporations at the expense of Iowa taxpayers. These data centers are also getting huge sales tax breaks on everything inside the data center. That’s millions of dollars in additional revenue down the drain for our state. As governor, I will end these tax breaks and make sure we’re putting the needs of Iowa taxpayers, not major corporations, first.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 9 ↗
Income & wages

Require investments in Iowa’s workforce : Good paying jobs are only good if they don’t increase costs or problems for other Iowans who are already here. As governor, I’d require new construction of data centers to be built by Iowa union workers that uphold job site quality standards, offer good wage…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Require investments in Iowa’s workforce : Good paying jobs are only good if they don’t increase costs or problems for other Iowans who are already here. As governor, I’d require new construction of data centers to be built by Iowa union workers that uphold job site quality standards, offer good wages for workers, and make investments in local workforce development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Support Family Caregivers : Family caregivers spend up to $7,500 of their own money every year to provide care for family members. Tens of thousands of Iowans provide full- or part-time care for a relative or loved one with no help or access to resources. Offering a nonrefundable tax credit of up to…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Support Family Caregivers : Family caregivers spend up to $7,500 of their own money every year to provide care for family members. Tens of thousands of Iowans provide full- or part-time care for a relative or loved one with no help or access to resources. Offering a nonrefundable tax credit of up to $2,000 annually for caregivers, with an additional $1,000 for caretakers of veterans, would help put money back in the pockets of family caregivers who do selfless work for our communities. These resources would be targeted based on income and need – approximately 57,000 Iowans would be eligible.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Support Family Caregivers: Family caregivers spend up to $7,500 of their own money every year to provide care for family members. Tens of thousands of Iowans provide full- or part-time care for a relative or loved one with no help or access to resources. Offering a nonrefundable tax credit of up to …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Truer Better Agenda: Making Life More Affordable for Iowa Families

Candidate campaign source

Support Family Caregivers: Family caregivers spend up to $7,500 of their own money every year to provide care for family members. Tens of thousands of Iowans provide full- or part-time care for a relative or loved one with no help or access to resources. Offering a nonrefundable tax credit of up to $2,000 annually for caregivers, with an additional $1,000 for caretakers of veterans, would help put money back in the pockets of family caregivers who do selfless work for our communities. These resources would be targeted based on income and need – approximately 57,000 Iowans would be eligible.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Expand and improve current conservation programs by offering tax credits for farmers : Very important to note: there are farmers who have been on waitlists for years to get into conservation programs. These programs run out of support from politicians long before they run out of farmers who want to …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Expand and improve current conservation programs by offering tax credits for farmers : Very important to note: there are farmers who have been on waitlists for years to get into conservation programs. These programs run out of support from politicians long before they run out of farmers who want to participate. Farmers know we can do better, and want to do better. They are an ally in getting clean water – it’s the politicians who are blocking progress. We need to build on current conservation efforts and ensure farmers who want to participate have the resources they need to do so. Ninety percent of farm income goes to the biggest 10% of farms. A way we can do that is by expanding and improving Iowa’s current conservation programs, and also creating tax credits for farmers to help offset the costs of conservation programs they already want to participate in. That includes an income tax credit to help cover the costs of conservation practices, and a property tax credit per acre for farms using approved nutrient plans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 7 ↗
Income & wages

Increase the minimum wage: Iowa has one of the lowest minimum wages in the country at just $7.25/hour. The last time it was increased was in 2008 – nearly 20 years ago! Iowans could move to any of our neighboring states to make more money or have access to better opportunities. In fact, we have the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Truer Better Agenda: Opportunities for All

Candidate campaign source

Increase the minimum wage: Iowa has one of the lowest minimum wages in the country at just $7.25/hour. The last time it was increased was in 2008 – nearly 20 years ago! Iowans could move to any of our neighboring states to make more money or have access to better opportunities. In fact, we have the lowest minimum wage in the Midwest. We need to increase the minimum wage to keep Iowa workers here at home with good-paying, family-supporting jobs and to keep up with inflation and the sky-high cost of living. I support raising the minimum wage to $12/hour.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Demand accountability for private school vouchers: I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: private school voucher program has been one of the biggest invitations to waste, fraud, and abuse in Iowa history, taking taxpayer dollars meant for public schools and handing them out to private schools an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Demand accountability for private school vouchers: I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: private school voucher program has been one of the biggest invitations to waste, fraud, and abuse in Iowa history, taking taxpayer dollars meant for public schools and handing them out to private schools and the wealthiest families in Iowa with zero accountability. We need to reform this policy to ensure tax dollars are being spent appropriately. I outlined that in my “Accountability for All” plan. If we reformed vouchers, we’d have money to pay for programs like universal school meals and universal Pre-K – with millions of dollars leftover. It’s about helping all Iowa kids, not just the wealthy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Restoring the full powers of the Auditor’s Office : After we uncovered a record amount of misspent tax dollars in my first term as State Auditor, government insiders passed a bill – which Governor Reynolds signed – allowing government agencies to hide key documents from the Auditor’s Office, making …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Restoring the full powers of the Auditor’s Office : After we uncovered a record amount of misspent tax dollars in my first term as State Auditor, government insiders passed a bill – which Governor Reynolds signed – allowing government agencies to hide key documents from the Auditor’s Office, making it harder to uncover waste, fraud, and abuse of tax dollars. You can’t imagine a clearer line drawn between who is working for Iowans and who is working for insiders than that. No matter who becomes Iowa’s next State Auditor, Republican or Democrat, the full powers of Iowa’s taxpayer watchdog should be restored to best protect Iowa’s tax dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Muhlbauer, running mate of Democratic gubernatorial nominee Rob Sand, convened a roundtable with Linn County elected officials. The discussion centered on the effects of state policies on local governments, particularly property tax changes, behavioral health reforms and what participants described …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Dave Muhlbauer — Local Government

Candidate campaign source

Muhlbauer, running mate of Democratic gubernatorial nominee Rob Sand, convened a roundtable with Linn County elected officials. The discussion centered on the effects of state policies on local governments, particularly property tax changes, behavioral health reforms and what participants described as a growing pattern of state preemption of local decision-making.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer — campaign source ↗
Taxes & tax policy

End tax breaks for data centers: Right now, we face a nearly $1.4 billion budget deficit. We shouldn’t be handing out more tax breaks for major corporations at the expense of Iowa taxpayers. These data centers are also getting huge sales tax breaks on everything inside the data center. That’s millio…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: My Plan to Hold Big Corporations and Data Centers Accountable

Candidate campaign source

End tax breaks for data centers: Right now, we face a nearly $1.4 billion budget deficit. We shouldn’t be handing out more tax breaks for major corporations at the expense of Iowa taxpayers. These data centers are also getting huge sales tax breaks on everything inside the data center. That’s millions of dollars in additional revenue down the drain for our state. As governor, I will end these tax breaks and make sure we’re putting the needs of Iowa taxpayers, not major corporations, first.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Tax out-of-state landowners at a higher rate and ban hedge funds and LLCs from buying up Iowa land: While we face significant budget challenges and our economy struggles, out of state interests are buying up farmland and housing while the proceeds flow out of state, leaving Iowans with fewer opportu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Tax out-of-state landowners at a higher rate and ban hedge funds and LLCs from buying up Iowa land: While we face significant budget challenges and our economy struggles, out of state interests are buying up farmland and housing while the proceeds flow out of state, leaving Iowans with fewer opportunities. For the last ten years, state government insiders have given tax breaks to out-of-state corporations while Iowans have gotten the short end of the stick. Iowa should belong to Iowans, and as governor, I would tax out-of-state landowners at a higher rate and ban hedge funds and LLCs from buying up too much Iowa land.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (C…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (Choose Iowa, Farm to School, USDA’s LAMP programs, Resilient Food System Infrastructure Fund, Iowa Economic Development Programs) to maximize efforts to grow food that can be consumed locally. Think farm to school, farm to hospital, farm to prison, farm to food bank. The federal government had a local food purchasing agreement program, but the program was cut. As governor, I’d model the former federal policy to the state level, and establish regional food business centers, a division tasked with advocating and assisting farmers with things like technical assistance and market development to boost the supply chain and support local job growth. Tax dollars from schools, hospitals, and jails go to feed people every day; the more that can get spent locally, the longer that money circulates in our local economies, and the more vitality we have outside of our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Requiring mandatory prison sentences for taxpayer abusers and thieves: This is a no-brainer. I’ve introduced this policy every year as State Auditor since I took office, yet government insiders have refused to take action on this common-sense proposal. Makes you wonder why. Thieves who steal Iowans’…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Requiring mandatory prison sentences for taxpayer abusers and thieves: This is a no-brainer. I’ve introduced this policy every year as State Auditor since I took office, yet government insiders have refused to take action on this common-sense proposal. Makes you wonder why. Thieves who steal Iowans’ hard-earned tax dollars should get more than a slap on the wrist, which is far too often what happens. The punishment must be severe enough to deter people from committing these crimes in the first place. I support mandatory prison time for anyone found guilty of stealing over $10,000 in taxpayer dollars, banning anyone convicted of fraud from doing business with the state, and stripping them of taxpayer-funded benefits like retirement and health care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Here’s the bottom line: as governor, I will make sure anyone building in Iowa is contributing to Iowa, not extracting from us. They should be paying full freight and carrying their own weight, not raising your costs for anything, and respecting those who were already here. If they accept those terms…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: My Plan to Hold Big Corporations and Data Centers Accountable

Candidate campaign source

Here’s the bottom line: as governor, I will make sure anyone building in Iowa is contributing to Iowa, not extracting from us. They should be paying full freight and carrying their own weight, not raising your costs for anything, and respecting those who were already here. If they accept those terms, then they can put downward pressure on your taxes and bring in good-paying jobs, both of which are wins for our state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 9 ↗
Income & wages

Iowa is consistently ranked at the bottom in the country for economic growth, and has averaged 48th for personal income growth over the last three years. Iowa’s hourly wage is the worst and least competitive in the region – the average Nebraskan earns nearly $2,000 more per year than the average Iow…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Iowa is consistently ranked at the bottom in the country for economic growth, and has averaged 48th for personal income growth over the last three years. Iowa’s hourly wage is the worst and least competitive in the region – the average Nebraskan earns nearly $2,000 more per year than the average Iowan, and the average Wisconsinite more than $3,000.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗

Rob Sand

11 statements

Democratic · Governor · IA

Taxes & tax policy

As State Auditor, Rob has uncovered a record amount of waste, fraud, and abuse. The insiders in Des Moines responded to Rob’s success by stripping the Auditor’s ability to find misspent tax dollars. As Governor, Rob will work to restore the taxpayer’s watchdog and to prevent your hard-earned money f…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections

Candidate campaign source

As State Auditor, Rob has uncovered a record amount of waste, fraud, and abuse. The insiders in Des Moines responded to Rob’s success by stripping the Auditor’s ability to find misspent tax dollars. As Governor, Rob will work to restore the taxpayer’s watchdog and to prevent your hard-earned money from being wasted. Rob’s office has also uncovered a shockingly high amount of illegal denials of care under Iowa’s Medicaid privatization executive order – which result in higher out-of-pocket healthcare costs for you and your family. As Governor, Rob will reverse the privatization of Medicaid the same way it was passed – by an executive order.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 10 more statements from Rob Sand
Taxes & tax policy

Restoring the full powers of the Auditor’s Office: After we uncovered a record amount of misspent tax dollars in my first term as State Auditor, government insiders passed a bill – which Governor Reynolds signed – allowing government agencies to hide key documents from the Auditor’s Office, making i…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Restoring the full powers of the Auditor’s Office: After we uncovered a record amount of misspent tax dollars in my first term as State Auditor, government insiders passed a bill – which Governor Reynolds signed – allowing government agencies to hide key documents from the Auditor’s Office, making it harder to uncover waste, fraud, and abuse of tax dollars. You can’t imagine a clearer line drawn between who is working for Iowans and who is working for insiders than that. No matter who becomes Iowa’s next State Auditor, Republican or Democrat, the full powers of Iowa’s taxpayer watchdog should be restored to best protect Iowa’s tax dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Income & wages

Require investments in Iowa’s workforce: Good paying jobs are only good if they don’t increase costs or problems for other Iowans who are already here. As governor, I’d require new construction of data centers to be built by Iowa union workers that uphold job site quality standards, offer good wages…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Require investments in Iowa’s workforce: Good paying jobs are only good if they don’t increase costs or problems for other Iowans who are already here. As governor, I’d require new construction of data centers to be built by Iowa union workers that uphold job site quality standards, offer good wages for workers, and make investments in local workforce development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Requiring mandatory prison sentences for taxpayer abusers and thieves: This is a no-brainer. I’ve introduced this policy every year as State Auditor since I took office, yet government insiders have refused to take action on this common-sense proposal. Makes you wonder why. Thieves who steal Iowans’…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Requiring mandatory prison sentences for taxpayer abusers and thieves: This is a no-brainer. I’ve introduced this policy every year as State Auditor since I took office, yet government insiders have refused to take action on this common-sense proposal. Makes you wonder why. Thieves who steal Iowans’ hard-earned tax dollars should get more than a slap on the wrist, which is far too often what happens. The punishment must be severe enough to deter people from committing these crimes in the first place. I support mandatory prison time for anyone found guilty of stealing over $10,000 in taxpayer dollars, banning anyone convicted of fraud from doing business with the state, and stripping them of taxpayer-funded benefits like retirement and health care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Tax out-of-state landowners at a higher rate and ban hedge funds and LLCs from buying up Iowa land: While we face significant budget challenges and our economy struggles, out of state interests are buying up farmland and housing while the proceeds flow out of state, leaving Iowans with fewer opportu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Tax out-of-state landowners at a higher rate and ban hedge funds and LLCs from buying up Iowa land: While we face significant budget challenges and our economy struggles, out of state interests are buying up farmland and housing while the proceeds flow out of state, leaving Iowans with fewer opportunities. For the last ten years, state government insiders have given tax breaks to out-of-state corporations while Iowans have gotten the short end of the stick. Iowa should belong to Iowans, and as governor, I would tax out-of-state landowners at a higher rate and ban hedge funds and LLCs from buying up too much Iowa land.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Legalize and regulate adult-use cannabis like alcohol: Right now, alcohol is regulated under the Alcoholic Beverages Division. As governor, Rob would add cannabis experts to the already-existing division to be charged with regulating the cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and sale of cannabis…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cannabis and drug policy

Candidate campaign source

Legalize and regulate adult-use cannabis like alcohol: Right now, alcohol is regulated under the Alcoholic Beverages Division. As governor, Rob would add cannabis experts to the already-existing division to be charged with regulating the cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and sale of cannabis. These experts would implement age restrictions, quality and safety standards, and taxation similar to how alcohol is regulated in the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Expand and improve current conservation programs by offering tax credits for farmers: Very important to note: there are farmers who have been on waitlists for years to get into conservation programs. These programs run out of support from politicians long before they run out of farmers who want to p…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Water quality, conservation, and environmental health

Candidate campaign source

Expand and improve current conservation programs by offering tax credits for farmers: Very important to note: there are farmers who have been on waitlists for years to get into conservation programs. These programs run out of support from politicians long before they run out of farmers who want to participate. Farmers know we can do better, and want to do better. They are an ally in getting clean water – it’s the politicians who are blocking progress. We need to build on current conservation efforts and ensure farmers who want to participate have the resources they need to do so. Ninety percent of farm income goes to the biggest 10% of farms. A way we can do that is by expanding and improving Iowa’s current conservation programs, and also creating tax credits for farmers to help offset the costs of conservation programs they already want to participate in. That includes an income tax credit to help cover the costs of conservation practices, and a property tax credit per acre for farms using approved nutrient plans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (C…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (Choose Iowa, Farm to School, USDA’s LAMP programs, Resilient Food System Infrastructure Fund, Iowa Economic Development Programs) to maximize efforts to grow food that can be consumed locally. Think farm to school, farm to hospital, farm to prison, farm to food bank. The federal government had a local food purchasing agreement program, but the program was cut. As governor, I’d model the former federal policy to the state level, and establish regional food business centers, a division tasked with advocating and assisting farmers with things like technical assistance and market development to boost the supply chain and support local job growth. Tax dollars from schools, hospitals, and jails go to feed people every day; the more that can get spent locally, the longer that money circulates in our local economies, and the more vitality we have outside of our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

End tax breaks for data centers: Right now, we face a nearly $1.4 billion budget deficit. We shouldn’t be handing out more tax breaks for major corporations at the expense of Iowa taxpayers. These data centers are also getting huge sales tax breaks on everything inside the data center. That’s millio…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy and utilities

Candidate campaign source

End tax breaks for data centers: Right now, we face a nearly $1.4 billion budget deficit. We shouldn’t be handing out more tax breaks for major corporations at the expense of Iowa taxpayers. These data centers are also getting huge sales tax breaks on everything inside the data center. That’s millions of dollars in additional revenue down the drain for our state. As governor, I will end these tax breaks and make sure we’re putting the needs of Iowa taxpayers, not major corporations, first.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Income & wages

Increase the minimum wage: Iowa has one of the lowest minimum wages in the country at just $7.25/hour. The last time it was increased was in 2008 – nearly 20 years ago! Iowans could move to any of our neighboring states to make more money or have access to better opportunities. In fact, we have the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Increase the minimum wage: Iowa has one of the lowest minimum wages in the country at just $7.25/hour. The last time it was increased was in 2008 – nearly 20 years ago! Iowans could move to any of our neighboring states to make more money or have access to better opportunities. In fact, we have the lowest minimum wage in the Midwest. We need to increase the minimum wage to keep Iowa workers here at home with good-paying, family-supporting jobs and to keep up with inflation and the sky-high cost of living. I support raising the minimum wage to $12/hour.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Here’s the bottom line: as governor, I will make sure anyone building in Iowa is contributing to Iowa, not extracting from us. They should be paying full freight and carrying their own weight, not raising your costs for anything, and respecting those who were already here. If they accept those terms…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Here’s the bottom line: as governor, I will make sure anyone building in Iowa is contributing to Iowa, not extracting from us. They should be paying full freight and carrying their own weight, not raising your costs for anything, and respecting those who were already here. If they accept those terms, then they can put downward pressure on your taxes and bring in good-paying jobs, both of which are wins for our state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Iowa candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Iowa incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Iowa legislators and Iowa’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Iowa’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 Iowa incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Ashley Hinson

U.S. House of Representatives, Iowa District 2 · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ashley Hinson
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · HR 2262

Flexibility for Workers Education Act

Jan 13, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Ashley Hinson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed reported text of HR 2262 would exclude voluntary education or training outside regular working hours from hours worked for federal minimum-wage and overtime purposes when no work is performed and nonparticipation carries no adverse action. This concerns compensable work time; the title alone does not make it a high-school diploma program.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Treatment of attendance or participation in certain activities(a)In generalSection 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(o)) is amended to read as follows:(o)Hours workedIn determining for the purposes of sections 6 and 7 the hours for which an employee is employed, there shall be excluded—(1)any time spent in changing clothes or washing at the beginning or end of each workday which was excluded from measured working time during the week involved by the express terms of or by custom or practice under a bona fide collective-bargaining agreement applicable to the particular employee; and(2)any time spent attending or participating in an education or training program or a similar activity (such as a lecture), regardless of whether the program or activity is offered or facilitated by the employer, provided that—(A)such attendance or participation occurs outside of the employee’s regular working hours;(B)such attendance or participation is voluntary, and the employer does not take adverse action against the employee on the basis that such employee does not so attend or participate; and(C)the employee does not perform any work for the employer during such attendance or participation..(b)Effective dateThe amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to hours worked on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Zachary Nunn

U.S. House of Representatives, Iowa District 3 · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Zachary Nunn
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · HR 1339

Safeguarding Social Security and Medicare Act

Feb 13, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Zachary Nunn · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 1339 would require a GAO study of inflation and living-cost effects on Social Security and Medicare and recommendations on providing full benefits. The Social Security portion explicitly addresses OASDI. It orders a study rather than changing eligibility, benefit amounts or the number of beneficiaries.

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. The proposal requires a study and recommendations concerning OASDI and Medicare. Only its OASDI portion relates to this beneficiary count; it does not change payments, eligibility or the number of beneficiaries. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Iowa residents receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Study on social security and medicareNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall conduct a study and submit a report to Congress on the following: (1)The effect of inflation and cost of living increases on Medicare and the Old-Age Survivor and Disability Insurance program under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). (2)Recommendations on any legislative actions necessary to improve the ability to provide full benefits under such programs.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Chuck Grassley

U.S. Senate, Iowa · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Chuck Grassley
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 1666

Improving Social Security’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act

May 7, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Chuck Grassley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 1666 would provide a coordinated Social Security Administration contact team for people whose account numbers were misused or whose cards were lost in transmission. Its scope includes misuse affecting title II benefits and records, as well as other programs. This is an administrative connection to OASDI beneficiaries, not a proposed benefit increase. The coordinated-contact requirement would take effect 180 days after enactment.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Iowa residents receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

714.Single point of contact for identity theft victims(a)In generalThe Commissioner of Social Security shall establish and implement procedures to ensure that any individual whose social security account number has been misused (such as to fraudulently obtain benefits under title II, VIII, or XVI of this Act, or in a manner that affects an individual’s records at the Social Security Administration, or in a manner that prompts the individual to request a new social security account number) or whose social security card has been lost in the course of transmission to the individual has a single point of contact at the Social Security Administration throughout the resolution of the individual’s case. The single point of contact shall track the individual’s case to completion and coordinate with other units to resolve issues as quickly as possible.(b)Single point of contact(1)In generalFor purposes of subsection (a), the single point of contact shall consist of a team or subset of specially trained employees who—(A)have the ability to coordinate with other units to resolve the issues involved in the individual's case, and(B)shall be accountable for the case until its resolution.(2)Team or subsetThe employees included within the team or subset described in paragraph (1) may change as required to meet the needs of the Social Security Administration, provided that procedures have been established to—(A)ensure continuity of records and case history, and(B)notify the individual when appropriate..(b)Effective dateThe amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Joni Ernst

U.S. Senate, Iowa · R–IA

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Joni Ernst
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 2591

Ethanol for America Act of 2025

Jul 31, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Joni Ernst · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 2591 would require EPA to finalize the specified E15 dispenser-labeling and storage-compatibility rule within 90 days of enactment. It would deem existing underground storage systems compliant with blends up to 15 percent ethanol even without installation or compatibility documents. Systems and components installed or replaced after the rule’s effective date for on-road motor fuel would have to accommodate blends up to 100 percent ethanol. These are regulatory compatibility rules, without establishing a gasoline-price reduction.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering fifteen states including Iowa. Iowa policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Iowa statewide average. Exempt off-road fuels and high-ethanol blends are distinct from regular gasoline. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Finalization of proposed rule required(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)AdministratorThe term Administrator means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.(2)Proposed ruleThe term proposed rule means the proposed rule of the Administrator entitled E15 Fuel Dispenser Labeling and Compatibility with Underground Storage Tanks (86 Fed. Reg. 5094 (January 19, 2021)).(b)Finalization requiredNot later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall finalize the proposed rule in accordance with this section.(c)E15 labeling requirementsIn finalizing the proposed rule pursuant to subsection (b) with respect to E15 labeling, the Administrator shall finalize the first co-proposal described in the proposed rule.(d)E15 compatibility with underground storage tanks(1)E15 compatibilityIn finalizing the proposed rule pursuant to subsection (b) with respect to the compatibility of underground storage tanks with fuel blends with up to 15 percent ethanol, the Administrator shall ensure that—(A)existing underground storage tank systems are deemed to be compliant with fuel blends with up to 15 percent ethanol, regardless of whether the owners or operators of those systems are able to locate installation or compatibility documentation for those systems;(B)steel and fiberglass underground storage tanks manufactured after July 2005 and all fiberglass reinforced plastic piping are considered compatible with fuel blends of up to 15 percent ethanol; and(C)if owners or operators of underground storage tank systems can demonstrate the compatibility of certain components of those systems (such as gaskets or seals) with fuel blends with up to 15 percent ethanol, those owners or operators are not required to replace other equipment to achieve full system compatibility.(2)Future storage flexibilityFor purposes of ensuring that gasoline and diesel underground storage tank systems have future flexibility in fuel storage, the Administrator, in finalizing the proposed rule pursuant to subsection (b), shall require owners and operators of underground storage tank systems that store motor fuel for on-road vehicles to ensure that those systems and the components of those systems, including components such as pipe dopes and sealants, that are installed or replaced after the effective date of the proposed rule are compatible with fuel blends with up to 100 percent ethanol, regardless of the types of fuel blends currently being stored in those systems.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 1761

Ending Unemployment Payments to Jobless Millionaires Act of 2025

May 14, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Joni Ernst · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 1761 would bar federal unemployment-benefit payments and related administrative spending for claimants with at least $1 million in base-period wages, with certification, verification and recovery requirements. The proposal concerns a cash-income component for a narrowly defined group, not a change in Iowa’s measured median income.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2. Ending unemployment payments to jobless millionaires (a) Prohibition on use of Federal funds (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be used— (A) to make payments of unemployment compensation benefits under an unemployment compensation program of the United States in a year to an individual whose wages during the individual’s base period are equal to or exceed $1,000,000; or (B) for any administrative costs associated with making payments described in subparagraph (A). (2) Compliance (A) Self-certification Any application for unemployment compensation under an unemployment compensation program of the United States shall include a form or procedure for an individual applicant to certify that such individual’s wages during the individual’s base period do not equal or exceed $1,000,000. (B) Verification Each State agency that is responsible for administering any unemployment compensation program of the United States shall utilize available systems to verify wage eligibility by assessing claimant income to the degree possible. (3) Audits The certifications required by paragraph (2) shall be auditable by the Department of Labor or the Government Accountability Office. (4) Recovery of overpayments Each State agency that is responsible for administering any unemployment compensation program of the United States shall require individuals who have received amounts of unemployment compensation under such a program to which they were not entitled to repay such amounts. (5) Effective date The prohibition under paragraph (1) shall apply to weeks of unemployment beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Prohibition on imposing limits on States The Secretary of Labor shall not promulgate any regulation or issue any guidance that would limit a State’s ability to disqualify an individual from receiving unemployment compensation on the basis that such individual has wages during the individual’s base period that are equal or exceed $1,000,000. (c) Unemployment compensation program of the United States defined In this section, the term unemployment compensation program of the United States means— (1) unemployment compensation for Federal civilian employees under subchapter I of chapter 85 of title 5, United States Code; (2) unemployment compensation for ex-servicemembers under subchapter II of chapter 85 of title 5, United States Code; (3) extended benefits under the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note); (4) any Federal temporary extension of unemployment compensation; (5) any Federal program that increases the weekly amount of unemployment compensation payable to individuals; and (6) any other Federal program providing for the payment of unemployment compensation, as determined by the Secretary of Labor.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Iowa officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Iowa statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.