Iowa · individual fact

Iowa education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher93.3%2020–2024 · #11 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher43.6%2020–2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher31.4%2020–2024 · #38 of 50 · highest first

Iowa over time

Explore Iowa readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Iowa officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Iowa effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Iowa change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading Iowa · source units
IowaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 214.6213.4219.8226.1Iowa, 2003: 223.3Iowa, 2005: 220.8Iowa, 2007: 224.9Iowa, 2009: 221.4Iowa, 2011: 220.7Iowa, 2013: 223.8Iowa, 2015: 223.6Iowa, 2017: 221.7Iowa, 2019: 220.5Iowa, 2022: 218Iowa, 2024: 214.6200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 39National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedIowa · Iowa directs a work-based learning clearinghouse · 2018-01-29Iowa work-based learningIowa · Iowa establishes children’s mental health planning · 2018-04-23Iowa children’s mental healthNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefIowa · Iowa establishes a pandemic recovery advisory board · 2020-06-18Iowa pandemic recovery boardNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawIowa · Iowa establishes a child care and workforce task force · 2021-03-10Iowa child care task forceNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeIowa · Iowa approves income-tax and local-finance changes · 2024-05-01Iowa tax and finance lawIowa · Iowa amends work-based learning governance and rescinds older orders · 2024-06-06Iowa executive-order amendmentsIowa · Iowa begins its utility and pipeline assessment schedule · 2025-01-01Iowa utility assessmentNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderIowa · Iowa directs university antisemitism review and educational resources · 2025-06-27Iowa university antisemitism reviewNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedIowa · Iowa renews its STEM advisory council · 2025-08-17Iowa STEM advisory councilIowa · Iowa DOGE task force submits its advisory report · 2025-09-29Iowa DOGE report submittedIowa · Iowa directs professional-license and state-hiring eligibility checks · 2025-10-08Iowa licensing and state hiringIowa · Iowa establishes a nuclear energy advisory task force · 2026-01-05Iowa nuclear energy task forceIowa · Iowa orders security assessments and restricted procurement review · 2026-02-10Iowa security and procurementNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleIowa · Iowa approves nuclear incentives and a university workforce fund · 2026-06-01Iowa nuclear lawIowa · Iowa approves an omnibus law with six item vetoes · 2026-06-02Iowa omnibus approvalNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityIowa · Iowa omnibus school, sanitation and workforce provisions take effect · 2026-07-01Iowa July provisionsIowa · Iowa’s nuclear tax incentive and workforce-fund law takes effect · 2026-07-01Iowa nuclear incentive startsNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginIowa · Iowa’s corrected school-athletics effective date arrives · 2026-08-01Iowa athletics timingNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approvalIowa · Iowa publishes its nuclear energy task force report · 2026-09-03Iowa nuclear report released● Iowa Legislature · 52● U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · 3◆ Governor · 162■ Iowa agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2003-12-012026-09-30

24 of 24 reviewed Iowa actions match · 22 date markers shown. 39 major events shown separately.

Iowa · 2024: 214.6 · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Iowa. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Iowa Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodIowaRankU.S. benchmark
2024214.6#25 of 50215
2022218#15 of 50217.5
2019220.5#23 of 50220.5
2017221.7#27 of 50221.9
2015223.6#23 of 50222.5
2013223.8#20 of 50221.8
2011220.7#27 of 50221.2
2009221.4#26 of 50220.9
2007224.9#14 of 50221
2005220.8#24 of 50219
2003223.3#9 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Iowa · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

Iowa · 2020–202493.3%
Iowa rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 93.3%2020–2024 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa · your comparison93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

93.3%2020–2024 estimate

Share of Iowa residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Additional attainment measure

Bachelor's degree or higher
31.4%
Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.

  • This measures adult educational attainment, not the current public-school graduation rate or school performance.
  • It combines people educated in different jurisdictions and time periods.
Iowa · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

Iowa · 2024214.6
Iowa rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Iowa. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Grade 4 reading history in Iowa213.1219.8226.420032024
2024 · Iowa: 214.6 · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Grade 4 reading history
PeriodIowaCompare
2003223.3
2005220.8
2007224.9
2009221.4
2011220.7
2013223.8
2015223.6
2017221.7
2019220.5
2022218
2024214.6

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 214.62024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa · your comparison214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

Iowa · FY2024$14,369
Iowa rank#35among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · $14,369FY2024 · Rank #35 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa · your comparison$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

Iowa · 2021–2290%
Iowa rank#2among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in Iowa78.2%86%93.8%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · Iowa: 90% · Rank #2 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodIowaCompare
2011–1289%
2012–1390%
2013–1491%
2014–1591%
2015–1691%
2016–1791%
2017–1891%
2018–1992%
2019–2092%
2020–2190%
2021–2290%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 90%2021–22 · Rank #2 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa · your comparison90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

Iowa · 2022–23$10,121
Iowa rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · $10,1212022–23 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa · your comparison$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Iowa candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

57 statements from 12 candidates

2026 Iowa Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 25 statements

Dave Muhlbauer

16 statements

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · IA

Schools & education

The last decade of one-party control and insiders putting politics over Iowans has eroded trust in nearly every realm – from our failing economy, our declining public schools, and our growing cancer rates. These policies have led to Iowans leaving the state in droves, seeking better opportunities an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

The last decade of one-party control and insiders putting politics over Iowans has eroded trust in nearly every realm – from our failing economy, our declining public schools, and our growing cancer rates. These policies have led to Iowans leaving the state in droves, seeking better opportunities and more freedom elsewhere.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
View 15 more statements from Dave Muhlbauer
Schools & education

Protect rural health care: Similar to our schools, Iowa’s rural hospitals serve as economic engines and major employers for our rural communities. But too many communities across our state are being left behind, forcing people to drive miles for basic health care or even to give birth. Policies at b…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Protect rural health care: Similar to our schools, Iowa’s rural hospitals serve as economic engines and major employers for our rural communities. But too many communities across our state are being left behind, forcing people to drive miles for basic health care or even to give birth. Policies at both the federal level – including the One Big Beautiful Bill, which kicked 110,000 Iowans off Medicaid and threatens rural hospitals – and at the state level are putting care out of reach and leaving communities without options. We need to do everything we can to support and protect our hospitals across the state from closing their doors. That starts with reversing the privatization of Medicaid – which I will begin on day one of my administration.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Schools & education

Limiting tuition increases so that the schools can’t just hike costs and become as unaffordable as they were before.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Limiting tuition increases so that the schools can’t just hike costs and become as unaffordable as they were before.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Schools & education

Resources for Cyber Bullying: As governor, I’d work with the Department of Education and local districts to ensure that schools have policies in place that hold cyber bullies accountable and provide resources for victims of cyber bullying. We also need to do more to crack down on sexual extortion an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Resources for Cyber Bullying: As governor, I’d work with the Department of Education and local districts to ensure that schools have policies in place that hold cyber bullies accountable and provide resources for victims of cyber bullying. We also need to do more to crack down on sexual extortion and AI deepfakes that put our kids in harm’s way in today’s digital world. I encourage our federal representatives to pass the James T. Woods Act, backed by Sen. Chuck Grassley, and to hold the Big Tech companies accountable for the harms they have knowingly caused and largely ignored, and will work on this at the state level as well.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer — campaign source ↗
Schools & education

We have a lot of problems in Iowa – we have the worst economy in the nation, our public schools, which used to be our state’s crown jewel, are now middle of the pack at best, and we have the number one growth rate for cancer.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

We have a lot of problems in Iowa – we have the worst economy in the nation, our public schools, which used to be our state’s crown jewel, are now middle of the pack at best, and we have the number one growth rate for cancer.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Schools & education

Demand accountability for private school vouchers: I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: private school voucher program has been one of the biggest invitations to waste, fraud, and abuse in Iowa history, taking taxpayer dollars meant for public schools and handing them out to private schools an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Demand accountability for private school vouchers: I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: private school voucher program has been one of the biggest invitations to waste, fraud, and abuse in Iowa history, taking taxpayer dollars meant for public schools and handing them out to private schools and the wealthiest families in Iowa with zero accountability. We need to reform this policy to ensure tax dollars are being spent appropriately. I outlined that in my “Accountability for All” plan. If we reformed vouchers, we’d have money to pay for programs like universal school meals and universal Pre-K – with millions of dollars leftover. It’s about helping all Iowa kids, not just the wealthy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Schools & education

Implementing rules and transparency for the private school voucher program: The current school voucher program is an open invitation to waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer dollars. This school year alone, the voucher program is estimated to cost taxpayers $350 million meant for our public schools to…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Implementing rules and transparency for the private school voucher program: The current school voucher program is an open invitation to waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer dollars. This school year alone, the voucher program is estimated to cost taxpayers $350 million meant for our public schools to unaccountable private schools, while funding for public schools isn’t keeping up with inflation . We need to ensure public oversight over public dollars. I support:

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Schools & education

Universal all day Pre-K: Investing early in our kids is the best way we can set them up for success, but over the last decade of one-party control, those investments haven’t been made. Look at the data: Iowa ranks 40th for state spending for pre-school, and over half of Iowa kids ages 3-4 don’t atte…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Universal all day Pre-K: Investing early in our kids is the best way we can set them up for success, but over the last decade of one-party control, those investments haven’t been made. Look at the data: Iowa ranks 40th for state spending for pre-school, and over half of Iowa kids ages 3-4 don’t attend pre-school. Every Iowa child should have access to high-quality Pre-K no matter where they live. Importantly, the return on investment is 17 to 1 because investing early in our kids’ education reduces the likelihood that they will commit crimes and reduces reliance on public assistance when those kids become adults.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Schools & education

Ending sweetheart deals for companies like Odyssey, which manages the school voucher program and more than doubled its rate less than a month after signing their no-bid contract, costing taxpayers an additional $2.7 million. Government insiders are trying to lock in those deals for years to come , r…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Ending sweetheart deals for companies like Odyssey, which manages the school voucher program and more than doubled its rate less than a month after signing their no-bid contract, costing taxpayers an additional $2.7 million. Government insiders are trying to lock in those deals for years to come , regardless of who is elected in November. That’s wrong.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Schools & education

Most importantly, we need to get back to protecting the Iowa way of life . I was born and raised in Iowa, and have started and raised my own family here. The fight to protect Iowa’s way of life is personal to me – the water we drink and play in, the strength of my kids’ public schools, and the state…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Most importantly, we need to get back to protecting the Iowa way of life . I was born and raised in Iowa, and have started and raised my own family here. The fight to protect Iowa’s way of life is personal to me – the water we drink and play in, the strength of my kids’ public schools, and the state of our economy. I’m the only candidate in this race with a stake in those fights – and with a plan to solve some of rural Iowa’s toughest challenges. These steps will help us support communities across our state and strengthen Iowa for generations to come.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Schools & education

Requiring annual audits of the private school voucher program to ensure that the money is spent responsibly.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Requiring annual audits of the private school voucher program to ensure that the money is spent responsibly.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Schools & education

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (C…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (Choose Iowa, Farm to School, USDA’s LAMP programs, Resilient Food System Infrastructure Fund, Iowa Economic Development Programs) to maximize efforts to grow food that can be consumed locally. Think farm to school, farm to hospital, farm to prison, farm to food bank. The federal government had a local food purchasing agreement program, but the program was cut. As governor, I’d model the former federal policy to the state level, and establish regional food business centers, a division tasked with advocating and assisting farmers with things like technical assistance and market development to boost the supply chain and support local job growth. Tax dollars from schools, hospitals, and jails go to feed people every day; the more that can get spent locally, the longer that money circulates in our local economies, and the more vitality we have outside of our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Schools & education

Universal school meals: Kids can’t learn on an empty stomach. Supporting policies like universal school meals would not only ensure our kids have the fuel they need to pay attention and be productive in the classroom, but would save every Iowa parent time and money each week. The federal government …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Universal school meals: Kids can’t learn on an empty stomach. Supporting policies like universal school meals would not only ensure our kids have the fuel they need to pay attention and be productive in the classroom, but would save every Iowa parent time and money each week. The federal government cut $1 billion in funding for local food programs in 2025, leaving districts across our state and the country scrambling. Some districts across Iowa offer universal school meals, but it should be available for every Iowa public school student. As governor, I’d advocate to model the former federal program at the state level, which I talk about in my “Opportunities for All” agenda, to cut costs for parents and make sure our kids are being fed without increasing costs on Iowans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Schools & education

Lowering Education Costs:

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Lowering Education Costs:

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Schools & education

As Governor, Rob will get Iowa back on track – he’ll build consensus to get the state government out of the culture wars and focused on lowering costs, growing the economy, improving our education system, and helping Iowans live better, healthier lives.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Rob Sand knows we need to move Iowa in a new direction

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, Rob will get Iowa back on track – he’ll build consensus to get the state government out of the culture wars and focused on lowering costs, growing the economy, improving our education system, and helping Iowans live better, healthier lives.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Implementing income limits so that the money is going to students and families who need it the most – not to the wealthiest Iowans who were sending their kids to private schools anyway.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Implementing income limits so that the money is going to students and families who need it the most – not to the wealthiest Iowans who were sending their kids to private schools anyway.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗

Rob Sand

9 statements

Democratic · Governor · IA

Schools & education

Protect rural health care: Similar to our schools, Iowa’s rural hospitals serve as economic engines and major employers for our rural communities. But too many communities across our state are being left behind, forcing people to drive miles for basic health care or even to give birth. Policies at b…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Protect rural health care: Similar to our schools, Iowa’s rural hospitals serve as economic engines and major employers for our rural communities. But too many communities across our state are being left behind, forcing people to drive miles for basic health care or even to give birth. Policies at both the federal level – including the One Big Beautiful Bill, which kicked 110,000 Iowans off Medicaid and threatens rural hospitals – and at the state level are putting care out of reach and leaving communities without options. We need to do everything we can to support and protect our hospitals across the state from closing their doors. That starts with reversing the privatization of Medicaid – which I will begin on day one of my administration.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
View 8 more statements from Rob Sand
Schools & education

It’s time to restore the slogan on Iowa’s quarter: “foundation in education.” New investments and initiatives, like universal all day pre-K, are needed to give our students the edge they need to compete for good paying jobs. Iowa’s private school voucher program takes resources away from public scho…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

It’s time to restore the slogan on Iowa’s quarter: “foundation in education.” New investments and initiatives, like universal all day pre-K, are needed to give our students the edge they need to compete for good paying jobs. Iowa’s private school voucher program takes resources away from public schools, and has no accountability for how that money is being spent. We can pay for universal pre-K by no longer sending our taxpayer dollars to Iowa’s wealthiest families to pay for the private school tuition they were going to pay on their own anyway. As Governor, Rob will fight to bring more oversight over the hundreds of millions of dollars being spent each year on vouchers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Schools & education

As Governor, Rob will get Iowa back on track – he’ll build consensus to get the state government out of the culture wars and focused on lowering costs, growing the economy, improving our education system, and helping Iowans live better, healthier lives.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: State government priorities

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, Rob will get Iowa back on track – he’ll build consensus to get the state government out of the culture wars and focused on lowering costs, growing the economy, improving our education system, and helping Iowans live better, healthier lives.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Schools & education

Resources for Cyber Bullying: As governor, I’d work with the Department of Education and local districts to ensure that schools have policies in place that hold cyber bullies accountable and provide resources for victims of cyber bullying. We also need to do more to crack down on sexual extortion an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology, privacy, and online safety

Candidate campaign source

Resources for Cyber Bullying: As governor, I’d work with the Department of Education and local districts to ensure that schools have policies in place that hold cyber bullies accountable and provide resources for victims of cyber bullying. We also need to do more to crack down on sexual extortion and AI deepfakes that put our kids in harm’s way in today’s digital world. I encourage our federal representatives to pass the James T. Woods Act, backed by Sen. Chuck Grassley, and to hold the Big Tech companies accountable for the harms they have knowingly caused and largely ignored, and will work on this at the state level as well.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Schools & education

Ending sweetheart deals for companies like Odyssey, which manages the school voucher program and more than doubled its rate less than a month after signing their no-bid contract, costing taxpayers an additional $2.7 million. Government insiders are trying to lock in those deals for years to come, re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections

Candidate campaign source

Ending sweetheart deals for companies like Odyssey, which manages the school voucher program and more than doubled its rate less than a month after signing their no-bid contract, costing taxpayers an additional $2.7 million. Government insiders are trying to lock in those deals for years to come, regardless of who is elected in November. That’s wrong.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Schools & education

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (C…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (Choose Iowa, Farm to School, USDA’s LAMP programs, Resilient Food System Infrastructure Fund, Iowa Economic Development Programs) to maximize efforts to grow food that can be consumed locally. Think farm to school, farm to hospital, farm to prison, farm to food bank. The federal government had a local food purchasing agreement program, but the program was cut. As governor, I’d model the former federal policy to the state level, and establish regional food business centers, a division tasked with advocating and assisting farmers with things like technical assistance and market development to boost the supply chain and support local job growth. Tax dollars from schools, hospitals, and jails go to feed people every day; the more that can get spent locally, the longer that money circulates in our local economies, and the more vitality we have outside of our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Schools & education

Implementing income limits so that the money is going to students and families who need it the most – not to the wealthiest Iowans who were sending their kids to private schools anyway.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Implementing income limits so that the money is going to students and families who need it the most – not to the wealthiest Iowans who were sending their kids to private schools anyway.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Schools & education

Requiring annual audits of the private school voucher program to ensure that the money is spent responsibly.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections

Candidate campaign source

Requiring annual audits of the private school voucher program to ensure that the money is spent responsibly.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Schools & education

Limiting tuition increases so that the schools can’t just hike costs and become as unaffordable as they were before.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Limiting tuition increases so that the schools can’t just hike costs and become as unaffordable as they were before.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Iowa Treasurer of State — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Roby Smith

2 statements

Republican · Treasurer of State · IA

Schools & education

In Iowa, the Treasurer’s office oversees the 529 College Savings Plan, which enables parents to save money, tax-free, for their children’s post-high school education.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Roby Smith's Plan to Protect Iowa's Taxpayers

Candidate campaign source

In Iowa, the Treasurer’s office oversees the 529 College Savings Plan, which enables parents to save money, tax-free, for their children’s post-high school education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Roby Smith campaign source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Roby Smith
Schools & education

Through the Junior Achievement program, Roby Smith volunteers to teach students in his area about fundamental financial skills, like opening a bank account and investing.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Roby Smith's Plan to Protect Iowa's Taxpayers

Candidate campaign source

Through the Junior Achievement program, Roby Smith volunteers to teach students in his area about fundamental financial skills, like opening a bank account and investing.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Roby Smith campaign source 2 ↗

2026 Iowa U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Christina Bohannan

6 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · IA

Schools & education

Guarantee every child access to a high-quality education by pushing for a substantial national investment in public education and school infrastructure, with a special focus on rural and small-town schools

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Guarantee every child access to a high-quality education by pushing for a substantial national investment in public education and school infrastructure, with a special focus on rural and small-town schools

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 5 more statements from Christina Bohannan
Schools & education

Make Iowa number one in public education again

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Make Iowa number one in public education again

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Schools & education

Ensure every Iowa child has access to school lunch and summer lunch so that every child can eat, and every child can learn

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Ensure every Iowa child has access to school lunch and summer lunch so that every child can eat, and every child can learn

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Schools & education

To me, freedom is being able to control your own destiny. That means the right of free speech for all regardless of your views or political beliefs, the right to protect your property from being taken by the government for corporate profit, the right to grow through education, the right to make your…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Constitutional government and civil liberties

Candidate campaign source

To me, freedom is being able to control your own destiny. That means the right of free speech for all regardless of your views or political beliefs, the right to protect your property from being taken by the government for corporate profit, the right to grow through education, the right to make your own health care decisions, the right to safe and healthy communities free from crime and pollution, and the right to participate in a fair and open economy in which hardworking people share in the wealth they help to create and get a fair shot to get ahead. I will always put Iowa and our freedoms first.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Schools & education

I believe our state and country should recommit to making education a priority, with a special focus on rural and small-community schools that face unique challenges. This focus on education is crucial to ensuring that our children will thrive, our economy will grow, and our nation will flourish. I …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

I believe our state and country should recommit to making education a priority, with a special focus on rural and small-community schools that face unique challenges. This focus on education is crucial to ensuring that our children will thrive, our economy will grow, and our nation will flourish. I support a comprehensive and historic national investment in education at every level.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Schools & education

Expand Career and Technical Education (CTE) so that students can find good-paying jobs in the trades or manufacturing

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Expand Career and Technical Education (CTE) so that students can find good-paying jobs in the trades or manufacturing

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Iowa candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Iowa incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Iowa legislators and Iowa’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Iowa’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Iowa incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Ashley Hinson

U.S. House of Representatives, Iowa District 2 · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ashley Hinson
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · HR 2262

Flexibility for Workers Education Act

Jan 13, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Ashley Hinson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed reported text of HR 2262 would exclude voluntary education or training outside regular working hours from hours worked for federal minimum-wage and overtime purposes when no work is performed and nonparticipation carries no adverse action. This concerns compensable work time; the title alone does not make it a high-school diploma program.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Treatment of attendance or participation in certain activities(a)In generalSection 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(o)) is amended to read as follows:(o)Hours workedIn determining for the purposes of sections 6 and 7 the hours for which an employee is employed, there shall be excluded—(1)any time spent in changing clothes or washing at the beginning or end of each workday which was excluded from measured working time during the week involved by the express terms of or by custom or practice under a bona fide collective-bargaining agreement applicable to the particular employee; and(2)any time spent attending or participating in an education or training program or a similar activity (such as a lecture), regardless of whether the program or activity is offered or facilitated by the employer, provided that—(A)such attendance or participation occurs outside of the employee’s regular working hours;(B)such attendance or participation is voluntary, and the employer does not take adverse action against the employee on the basis that such employee does not so attend or participate; and(C)the employee does not perform any work for the employer during such attendance or participation..(b)Effective dateThe amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to hours worked on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Chuck Grassley

U.S. Senate, Iowa · R–IA

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Chuck Grassley
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 4854

Foster Youth Housing Opportunity Act

Jun 23, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Chuck Grassley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 4854 would allow states to use specified foster-youth allotments for housing-supportive services for eligible youth under age 26 who receive Section 8(x) housing assistance. Services include rental-lease counseling, security deposits, utility connections and moving costs; these expenditures would not count toward the specified room-and-board limit. The changes take effect one year after enactment. This concerns a limited tenant population, without setting market rents.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Iowa’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(6)Housing supportive services(A)In generalA State may use amounts from its allotment under subsection (c) to provide supportive services to assist eligible youth who experienced foster care to obtain or retain suitable housing.(B)Definitions(i)Eligible youthIn this subsection, the term eligible youth means an individual who receives assistance provided under section 8(x) of the United States Housing Act of 1937.(ii)Supportive servicesThe term supportive services may include—(I)basic life skills information and counseling on financial literacy, use of credit, and money management;(II)counseling on rental lease contracts and assistance with rental insurance; and(III)assistance with security deposits, utility connection fees, moving costs, and other fees associated with establishing tenancy.(C)ExceptionExpenditures in accordance with this paragraph shall not be considered expenditures for room and board for purposes of subsection (b)(3)(B).(D)Aligning age eligibilityNotwithstanding subsection (b)(3)(A)(ii), a State may use funds from its allotment under subsection (c) to provide supportive services to eligible youth who have not attained 26 years of age for the purpose of supporting continued access to housing. […] 5.Effective dateThis Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 560

EAGLES Act of 2025

Feb 13, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Chuck Grassley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 560 would expand the Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center functions for research, training, consultation and information sharing to prevent targeted violence, including a school-violence program. Targeted assaults overlap a subset of violent offenses; the relationship does not equate every threat with a reported violent crime. The proposed section ends September 30, 2030, and its funds may not be used for firearms-use training.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. The center’s functions concern prevention of targeted violence, including school violence. Only overlapping violent offenses relate to the FBI crime measure; research, training and threats are not themselves counted crimes. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3056B.Functions of the National Threat Assessment Center of the United States Secret Service(a)In generalThere is established a National Threat Assessment Center (in this section referred to as the Center), to be operated by the United States Secret Service, at the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security.(b)FunctionsThe functions of the Center shall include the following:(1)Training and education in the area of best practices on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence.(2)Consultation on complex threat assessment cases and programs.(3)Research on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence, consistent with evidence-based standards and existing laws and regulations.(4)Facilitation of information sharing on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence among agencies and organizations with protective or public safety responsibilities, as well as other public or private entities.(5)Development of evidence-based programs to promote the standardization of Federal, State, and local threat assessments and best practices for the prevention of targeted violence.(c)Safe school initiativeIn carrying out the functions described in subsection (b), the Center shall establish a national program on targeted school violence prevention, focusing on the following activities:(1)ResearchThe Center shall—(A)conduct research into targeted school violence and evidence-based practices in targeted school violence prevention, including school threat assessment; and(B)publish the findings of the Center on the public website of the United States Secret Service and on the School Safety Clearinghouse website, known as www.SchoolSafety.gov.(2)Training(A)In generalThe Center shall develop and offer training courses on targeted school violence prevention to agencies with protective or public safety responsibilities and other public or private entities, including local educational agencies.(B)PlanNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Center shall establish a plan to offer its training and other educational resources to public or private entities within each State.(3)Coordination with other Federal agenciesThe Center shall develop research and training programs under this section in coordination with the Department of Justice, the Department of Education, and the Department of Health and Human Services.(4)Consultation with entities outside the Federal GovernmentThe Center is authorized to consult with State and local educational, law enforcement, and mental health officials and private entities in the development of research and training programs under this section.(5)Interactive websiteThe Center may create an interactive website to disseminate information and data on evidence-based practices in targeted school violence prevention.(d)Hiring of additional personnelThe Director of the United States Secret Service may hire additional personnel to comply with the requirements of this section, which, if the Director exercises such authority, shall include—(1)at least 1 employee with expertise in child psychological development; and(2)at least 1 employee with expertise in school threat assessment. (e)Report to CongressNot later than two years after the date of enactment of this section, the Director of the United States Secret Service shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Education and Workforce, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report on actions taken by the United States Secret Service to implement provisions of this section, which shall include information relating to the following:(1)The number of employees hired (on a full-time equivalent basis).(2)The number of individuals in each State trained in threat assessment.(3)The number of school districts in each State trained in school threat assessment or targeted school violence prevention.(4)Information on Federal, State, and local agencies trained or otherwise assisted by the Center.(5)A formal evaluation indicating whether the training and other assistance provided by the Center is effective.(6)A formal evaluation indicating whether the training and other assistance provided by the Center was implemented by the school.(7)A summary of the Center’s research activities and findings.(8)A strategic plan for disseminating the Center’s educational and training resources to each State.(f)Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.(g)No funds To provide firearms trainingAmounts made available to carry out this section may not be used to train any person in the use of a firearm.(h)No effect on other lawsNothing in this section may be construed to preclude or contradict any other provision of law authorizing training in the use of firearms.(i)TerminationThis section shall terminate on September 30, 2030.(j)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Evidence-basedThe term evidence-based means—(A)strong evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented experimental study;(B)moderate evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented quasi-experimental study; or(C)promising evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias.(2)Local educational agencyThe term local educational agency has the meaning given such term under section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).(3)StateThe term State means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands..
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Iowa officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Iowa statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.