Iowa · individual fact

Iowa crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Iowa public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate247.2 per 100k2024 · #36 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,331 per 100k2024 · #41 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage96.7%2024 · #38 of 50 · highest first

Iowa over time

Explore Iowa readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Iowa officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Iowa effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Iowa change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate Iowa · source units
IowaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 247.2 per 100k222.9 per 100k273.2 per 100k323.5 per 100kIowa, 2015: 278.5 per 100kIowa, 2016: 296.6 per 100kIowa, 2017: 291.1 per 100kIowa, 2018: 232.6 per 100kIowa, 2019: 290.3 per 100kIowa, 2020: 313.8 per 100kIowa, 2021: 300.1 per 100kIowa, 2022: 295.5 per 100kIowa, 2023: 279.7 per 100kIowa, 2024: 247.2 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 42National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedIowa · Iowa restores citizenship rights after qualifying felony sentences · 2020-08-05Iowa citizenship rightsNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsIowa · Iowa approves income-tax and local-finance changes · 2024-05-01Iowa tax and finance lawIowa · Iowa amends work-based learning governance and rescinds older orders · 2024-06-06Iowa executive-order amendmentsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyIowa · Iowa directs university antisemitism review and educational resources · 2025-06-27Iowa university antisemitism reviewIowa · Iowa orders security assessments and restricted procurement review · 2026-02-10Iowa security and procurementIowa · Iowa approves an omnibus law with six item vetoes · 2026-06-02Iowa omnibus approvalIowa · Iowa’s judicial-compensation framework takes effect · 2026-06-19Iowa judicial pay frameworkIowa · Iowa omnibus school, sanitation and workforce provisions take effect · 2026-07-01Iowa July provisionsIowa · Iowa establishes a Medicaid fraud advisory task force · 2026-07-01Iowa Medicaid fraud task forceNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● Iowa Legislature · 622● U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · 5◆ Governor · 1122■ Iowa agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-01-012026-08-31

22 of 22 reviewed Iowa actions match · 18 date markers shown. 42 major events shown separately.

Iowa · 2024: 247.2 per 100k · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Iowa's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 94.0% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Iowa Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodIowaRankU.S. benchmark
2024247.2 per 100k#36 of 50Not available
2023279.7 per 100k#34 of 50Not available
2022295.5 per 100k#34 of 50Not available
2021300.1 per 100k#30 of 50Not available
2020313.8 per 100k#31 of 50Not available
2019290.3 per 100k#34 of 50Not available
2018232.6 per 100k#40 of 50Not available
2017291.1 per 100k#34 of 50Not available
2016296.6 per 100k#33 of 50Not available
2015278.5 per 100k#34 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Iowa · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

Iowa · 2024247.2 per 100k
Iowa rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Iowa's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 94.0% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Reported violent-crime rate history in Iowa220.4 per 100k273.2 per 100k326 per 100k20152024
2024 · Iowa: 247.2 per 100k · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodIowaCompare
2015278.5 per 100k
2016296.6 per 100k
2017291.1 per 100k
2018232.6 per 100k
2019290.3 per 100k
2020313.8 per 100k
2021300.1 per 100k
2022295.5 per 100k
2023279.7 per 100k
2024247.2 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 247.2 per 100k2024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa · your comparison247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

247.2 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Iowa's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 94.0% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 96.7%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

1,331 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Iowa's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 94.0% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 96.7%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Iowa · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

Iowa · 2024389
Iowa rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 3892024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa · your comparison389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

3892024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was recorded as the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
11.8 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data published through CDC WONDER and Stats of the States.

  • The total combines firearm homicides, suicides, accidents, legal-intervention deaths, and deaths of undetermined intent.
  • Mortality data do not measure nonfatal firearm injuries, defensive uses, gun ownership, or the effect of any specific policy.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Iowa candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

13 statements from 8 candidates

2026 Iowa Attorney General — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Brenna Bird

3 statements

Republican · Attorney General · IA

Crime & victimization

Doubled the number of prosecutors in the Attorney General's office who assist with murder, sexual-assault, and child-abuse prosecutions.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Criminal Prosecution

Candidate campaign source

Doubled the number of prosecutors in the Attorney General's office who assist with murder, sexual-assault, and child-abuse prosecutions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brenna Bird — Part 87 verified source ↗
View 2 more statements from Brenna Bird
Crime & victimization

Created a dedicated Iowa Cold Case Unit to work with local law enforcement on more than 400 unsolved homicides and related cases.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cold Cases

Candidate campaign source

Created a dedicated Iowa Cold Case Unit to work with local law enforcement on more than 400 unsolved homicides and related cases.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brenna Bird — Part 87 verified source ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Prosecuted criminal cases, advocated for crime victims, and supported law enforcement as Guthrie County Attorney.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public Safety

Candidate campaign source

Prosecuted criminal cases, advocated for crime victims, and supported law enforcement as Guthrie County Attorney.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Brenna Bird — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Nate Willems

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · IA

Policing & criminal justice context

Nate has always been driven toward public service and determined to make our state and community stronger. As the state's largest law firm dedicated to serving the people, the Attorney General's office has an opportunity to take on and solve serious challenges. As Attorney General, he will work with…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Nate has always been driven toward public service and determined to make our state and community stronger. As the state's largest law firm dedicated to serving the people, the Attorney General's office has an opportunity to take on and solve serious challenges. As Attorney General, he will work with prosecutors and local law enforcement to secure convictions for violent crimes, improve consumer protections, and hold corporations accountable when they break the law.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nate Willems — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Iowa Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Dave Muhlbauer

1 statement

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · IA

Policing & criminal justice context

Increase Punishments for Online Predators: I spent seven years as a prosecutor, putting away some of the worst sexual predators and sexually violent criminals. Social media companies have made it too easy for sexual predators to prey on our kids online. As governor, I would support increasing punish…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Increase Punishments for Online Predators: I spent seven years as a prosecutor, putting away some of the worst sexual predators and sexually violent criminals. Social media companies have made it too easy for sexual predators to prey on our kids online. As governor, I would support increasing punishments for online sexual predators who target our kids, including making sure our law enforcement officials have the training and resources they need to investigate these crimes; require social media platforms to use proactive detection and reporting to identify predators; and hold Big Tech companies accountable for any products that sexualize children.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer — campaign source ↗

Rob Sand

1 statement

Democratic · Governor · IA

Policing & criminal justice context

Increase Punishments for Online Predators: I spent seven years as a prosecutor, putting away some of the worst sexual predators and sexually violent criminals. Social media companies have made it too easy for sexual predators to prey on our kids online. As governor, I would support increasing punish…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Increase Punishments for Online Predators: I spent seven years as a prosecutor, putting away some of the worst sexual predators and sexually violent criminals. Social media companies have made it too easy for sexual predators to prey on our kids online. As governor, I would support increasing punishments for online sexual predators who target our kids, including making sure our law enforcement officials have the training and resources they need to investigate these crimes; require social media platforms to use proactive detection and reporting to identify predators; and hold Big Tech companies accountable for any products that sexualize children.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗

2026 Iowa U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Lindsay James

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · IA

Policing & criminal justice context

Common Sense Gun Safety: We need to get dangerous weapons out of criminals hands and follow our police officers guidance. We must close loopholes, mandate violent history checks, pass red flag laws, and ban assault weapons. As a mother, I should not be scared to send my child to school.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Gun policy and firearms

Candidate campaign source

Common Sense Gun Safety: We need to get dangerous weapons out of criminals hands and follow our police officers guidance. We must close loopholes, mandate violent history checks, pass red flag laws, and ban assault weapons. As a mother, I should not be scared to send my child to school.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lindsay James — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
View 1 more statement from Lindsay James
Policing & criminal justice context

Invest in Law Enforcement: Our police officers are on the front lines of the systemic problems in our society. We need to ensure law enforcement is fully funded, paid well, and their benefits are protected.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Invest in Law Enforcement: Our police officers are on the front lines of the systemic problems in our society. We need to ensure law enforcement is fully funded, paid well, and their benefits are protected.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lindsay James — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Iowa candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Iowa incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Iowa legislators and Iowa’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Iowa’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Iowa incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Randy Feenstra

U.S. House of Representatives, Iowa District 4 · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Randy Feenstra
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · HR 2930

PROTECT the Second Amendment Act

Apr 17, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Randy Feenstra · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 2930 would prohibit covered federally assisted rental housing from banning or adding conditions to residents’ lawful firearm possession in their dwelling and specified transit through common areas. This is a firearm-access rule for a defined housing population, not a rent-setting measure.

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Firearms in covered federally assisted rental housing(a)In generalNo resident of covered federally assisted rental housing may be prohibited from, nor subject to additional restrictions or conditions when, lawfully possessing a firearm within—(1)the residential dwelling unit occupied by the resident; or(2)any common area of the covered federally assisted rental housing in which the resident resides if the resident is carrying or transporting the firearm through such area during the course of journeying to the residential dwelling unit of the resident or exiting the covered federally assisted rental housing.(b)Covered federally assisted rental housingThe term covered federally assisted rental housing means a residential dwelling unit that is made available for rental and for which assistance is provided, or that is part of a housing project for which assistance is provided, under any program administered by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development or the Secretary of Agriculture including—(1)the public housing program under the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.);(2)the program for rental assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f);(3)the HOME Investment Partnerships program under title II of the Cranton-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12721 et seq.);(4)the Housing Trust Fund program under section 1338 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4568);(5)the program for supportive housing for persons with disabilities under section 811 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 8013);(6)the AIDS Housing Opportunities program under subtitle D of title VIII of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12901 et seq.);(7)the program for Native American housing under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.);(8)the program for housing assistance for Native Hawaiians under title VIII of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4221 et seq.); and(9)the programs for assistance for rural rental housing under title V of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Chuck Grassley

U.S. Senate, Iowa · R–IA

3 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Chuck Grassley
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 1652

Protecting Communities and Preserving the Second Amendment Act of 2025

May 7, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Chuck Grassley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed portions of S 1652 would reauthorize NICS improvement grants at $20 million annually for fiscal 2026–2030, add grant accountability requirements and direct federal agencies to share relevant prohibited-person records with NICS. This addresses firearm background-check administration, not all provisions of the bill or a demonstrated mortality effect.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Reauthorization and improvements to NICS(a)In generalSection 103 of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (34 U.S.C. 40913) is amended—(1)by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (f), (g), and (h), respectively;(2)by amending subsection (f), as so redesignated, to read as follows:(f)Authorization of appropriationsThere are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.; and(3)by inserting after subsection (d) the following:(e)AccountabilityAll grants awarded by the Attorney General under this section shall be subject to the following accountability provisions:(1)DefinitionIn this subsection, the term unresolved audit finding means a finding in the final audit report of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice that the audited grantee has utilized grant funds for an unauthorized expenditure or otherwise unallowable cost that is not closed or resolved within 12 months from the date when the final audit report is issued.(2)Audits(A)In generalBeginning in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of the Protecting Communities and Preserving the Second Amendment Act of 2025, and in each fiscal year thereafter, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice shall conduct audits of recipients of grants under this section to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse of funds by grantees. (B)Selection of grantees for auditThe Inspector General shall determine the appropriate number of grantees to be audited each year.(3)PriorityIn awarding grants under this section, the Attorney General shall give priority to eligible applicants that did not have an unresolved audit finding during the 3 fiscal years before submitting an application for a grant under this section..(b)Modification of eligibility requirementsThe NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (34 U.S.C. 40902 et seq.) is amended—(1)in section 102(b)(1) (34 U.S.C. 40912(b)(1))—(A)in subparagraph (A), by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting subparagraph (B);(B)by striking subparagraph (B); and(C)by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B);(2)in section 103 (34 U.S.C. 40913)—(A)in subsection (a)(1), by striking and subject to section 102(b)(1)(B); and(B)in subsection (e)(2)(B)(ii)(II), by striking section 102(b)(1)(C) and inserting section 102(b)(1)(B); and(3)in section 104(d) (34 U.S.C. 40914(d)), by striking section 102(b)(1)(C) and inserting section 102(b)(1)(B).4.Availability of records to NICS(a)GuidanceNot later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall issue guidance regarding—(1)the identification and sharing of relevant Federal records; and(2)submission of the relevant Federal records to NICS.(b)Prioritization of recordsEach agency that possesses relevant Federal records shall prioritize providing the relevant information contained in the relevant Federal records to NICS on a regular and ongoing basis in accordance with the guidance issued by the Attorney General under subsection (a).(c)ReportsNot later than 60 days after the Attorney General issues guidance under subsection (a), the head of each agency shall submit a report to the Attorney General that—(1)advises whether the agency possesses relevant Federal records; and(2)describes the implementation plan of the agency for making the relevant information contained in relevant Federal records available to NICS in a manner consistent with applicable law.(d)Determination of relevanceThe Attorney General shall resolve any dispute regarding whether—(1)agency records are relevant Federal records; and(2)the relevant Federal records of an agency should be made available to NICS.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 1404

Combating Organized Retail Crime Act

Apr 10, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Chuck Grassley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 1404 would establish a federal center to coordinate organized retail and supply-chain crime investigations, share information and assist state and local law enforcement. Retail larceny and cargo theft overlap parts of the property-crime measure; fraud and the bill’s other covered conduct are broader than that statistical category.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported property offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. Burglary, larceny-theft and motor-vehicle theft are components of the FBI property-crime series. Fraud and identity theft are outside this property-crime series. A measure about one component is not evidence of a change in total or unreported crime. The proposed center coordinates investigations, information sharing, trend reports and assistance to other agencies. Retail larceny and qualifying cargo theft concern components of FBI property crime, while the broader federal offense list cannot replace the statistical definition. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

4.Establishment of a Center to Combat Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crime(a)In generalTitle III of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (19 U.S.C. 4341 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 305 the following:305A.Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crime Coordination Center(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)CenterThe term Center means the Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crime Coordination Center established pursuant to subsection (b)(1).(2)Organized retail and supply chain crimeThe term organized retail and supply chain crime includes—(A)any crime described in section 659, 2117, 2314, or 2315 of title 18, United States Code that is committed by, in coordination with, or at the instruction of an organization; (B)aiding or abetting the commission of, or conspiring to commit, any act that is in furtherance of a violation of a crime referred to in subparagraph (A); and(C)other crimes related to those described in subparagraphs (A) and (B). (3)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Homeland Security. (4)Executive Associate DirectorThe term Executive Associate Director means the Executive Associate Director of Homeland Security Investigations.(b)Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crime Coordination Center(1)EstablishmentNot later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Combating Organized Retail Crime Act, the Secretary shall direct the Executive Associate Director to establish the Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crime Coordination Center.(2)DutiesThe duties of the Center shall include—(A)coordinating Federal law enforcement activities related to organized retail and supply chain crime, including investigations of national and transnational criminal organizations that are engaged in organized retail and supply chain crime;(B)establishing relationships with State and local law enforcement agencies and organizations, including organized retail crime associations and cargo theft associations, and sharing information regarding organized retail and supply chain crime threats with such agencies and organizations;(C)assisting State and local law enforcement agencies with State and local investigations of organized retail and supply chain crime groups;(D)establishing relationships with retail, transportation, and other companies determined by the Executive Associate Director to have significant interests relating to organized retail and supply chain crime threats, sharing information with those companies regarding such threats, collaborating on investigations and loss prevention activities as appropriate, and providing a mechanism for the receipt of investigative information on such threats;(E)establishing a secure system for sharing information regarding organized retail and supply chain crime threats by leveraging existing information systems at the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice;(F)tracking trends with respect to organized retail and supply chain crime and releasing annual public reports on such trends; and(G)supporting the provision of training and technical assistance in accordance with subsection (c).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 560

EAGLES Act of 2025

Feb 13, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Chuck Grassley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 560 would expand the Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center functions for research, training, consultation and information sharing to prevent targeted violence, including a school-violence program. Targeted assaults overlap a subset of violent offenses; the relationship does not equate every threat with a reported violent crime. The proposed section ends September 30, 2030, and its funds may not be used for firearms-use training.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. The center’s functions concern prevention of targeted violence, including school violence. Only overlapping violent offenses relate to the FBI crime measure; research, training and threats are not themselves counted crimes. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3056B.Functions of the National Threat Assessment Center of the United States Secret Service(a)In generalThere is established a National Threat Assessment Center (in this section referred to as the Center), to be operated by the United States Secret Service, at the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security.(b)FunctionsThe functions of the Center shall include the following:(1)Training and education in the area of best practices on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence.(2)Consultation on complex threat assessment cases and programs.(3)Research on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence, consistent with evidence-based standards and existing laws and regulations.(4)Facilitation of information sharing on threat assessment and the prevention of targeted violence among agencies and organizations with protective or public safety responsibilities, as well as other public or private entities.(5)Development of evidence-based programs to promote the standardization of Federal, State, and local threat assessments and best practices for the prevention of targeted violence.(c)Safe school initiativeIn carrying out the functions described in subsection (b), the Center shall establish a national program on targeted school violence prevention, focusing on the following activities:(1)ResearchThe Center shall—(A)conduct research into targeted school violence and evidence-based practices in targeted school violence prevention, including school threat assessment; and(B)publish the findings of the Center on the public website of the United States Secret Service and on the School Safety Clearinghouse website, known as www.SchoolSafety.gov.(2)Training(A)In generalThe Center shall develop and offer training courses on targeted school violence prevention to agencies with protective or public safety responsibilities and other public or private entities, including local educational agencies.(B)PlanNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Center shall establish a plan to offer its training and other educational resources to public or private entities within each State.(3)Coordination with other Federal agenciesThe Center shall develop research and training programs under this section in coordination with the Department of Justice, the Department of Education, and the Department of Health and Human Services.(4)Consultation with entities outside the Federal GovernmentThe Center is authorized to consult with State and local educational, law enforcement, and mental health officials and private entities in the development of research and training programs under this section.(5)Interactive websiteThe Center may create an interactive website to disseminate information and data on evidence-based practices in targeted school violence prevention.(d)Hiring of additional personnelThe Director of the United States Secret Service may hire additional personnel to comply with the requirements of this section, which, if the Director exercises such authority, shall include—(1)at least 1 employee with expertise in child psychological development; and(2)at least 1 employee with expertise in school threat assessment. (e)Report to CongressNot later than two years after the date of enactment of this section, the Director of the United States Secret Service shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Education and Workforce, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report on actions taken by the United States Secret Service to implement provisions of this section, which shall include information relating to the following:(1)The number of employees hired (on a full-time equivalent basis).(2)The number of individuals in each State trained in threat assessment.(3)The number of school districts in each State trained in school threat assessment or targeted school violence prevention.(4)Information on Federal, State, and local agencies trained or otherwise assisted by the Center.(5)A formal evaluation indicating whether the training and other assistance provided by the Center is effective.(6)A formal evaluation indicating whether the training and other assistance provided by the Center was implemented by the school.(7)A summary of the Center’s research activities and findings.(8)A strategic plan for disseminating the Center’s educational and training resources to each State.(f)Authorization of appropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.(g)No funds To provide firearms trainingAmounts made available to carry out this section may not be used to train any person in the use of a firearm.(h)No effect on other lawsNothing in this section may be construed to preclude or contradict any other provision of law authorizing training in the use of firearms.(i)TerminationThis section shall terminate on September 30, 2030.(j)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Evidence-basedThe term evidence-based means—(A)strong evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented experimental study;(B)moderate evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented quasi-experimental study; or(C)promising evidence from at least one well-designed and well-implemented correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias.(2)Local educational agencyThe term local educational agency has the meaning given such term under section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).(3)StateThe term State means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Joni Ernst

U.S. Senate, Iowa · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Joni Ernst
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 1922

FIREARM Act

Jun 2, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Joni Ernst · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 1922 would restrict firearm-license revocation or renewal denial based on self-reported violations and require notice plus 30 business days to correct covered violations before enforcement. Prohibited transfers and specified uncorrectable violations remain excepted, including the stated acute-risk exception. These procedural protections concern dealer regulation, without establishing a change in firearm deaths.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(b) Self-Reported violations; opportunity To correct violations Section 923(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (1) after (e); and (2) by adding at the end the following: (2) (A) The Attorney General may not bring an enforcement action to revoke, or deny a renewal of, a license for a violation of any provision of this chapter or any implementing regulation thereof on the basis of a self-reported violation, except in the case of a violation— (i) that is not correctable after the violation occurred; or (ii) in which a firearm was transferred to a person who is prohibited from possessing a firearm pursuant to any provision of this chapter or any implementing regulation thereof. (B) In the case of a self-reported violation, the Attorney General shall— (i) assist the licensee to correct the self-reported violation; and (ii) provide the licensee with instructions and compliance training designed to assist the licensee in avoiding repetition of the self-reported violation in the future. (3) (A) Before initiating an enforcement action under this subsection, the Attorney General shall provide the licensee with actual notice of the violation giving rise to the enforcement action, which shall include, at a minimum— (i) a detailed explanation of the substance of the violation; (ii) all evidence or documentation in the possession of the Attorney General regarding the enforcement action; and (iii) a statement that the Attorney General will not initiate the enforcement action if the licensee corrects the violation by the date that is 30 business days after the date on which the licensee first receives actual notice of the violation. (B) The Attorney General may bring an enforcement action under this subsection against a licensee described in subparagraph (A) if— (i) 30 business days have elapsed since the date on which the licensee received the notice of the violation required under that subparagraph; and (ii) the licensee has not corrected the violation. (C) If a self-reported violation is of a nature such that it cannot be corrected within the grace period and with the assistance provided pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3), the Attorney General may deny a licensee the opportunity to correct. (4) The Attorney General may not bring an enforcement action on the basis of any violation of any provision of this chapter or any implementing regulation thereof that has been corrected pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) unless the violation involves a prohibited transfer of a firearm or another uncorrectable violation that creates a direct and acute risk of death or serious bodily injury as a result of the uncorrectable violation. .
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Iowa officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Iowa statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.