Iowa · individual fact

Iowa prices and inflation

Compare Iowa’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Iowa CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level87.82024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level93.72024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level65.32024 · #43 of 50 · highest first

Iowa over time

Explore Iowa readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Iowa officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Iowa effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Iowa change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Iowa · source units
IowaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 87.886.393.9101.5Iowa, 2014: 91Iowa, 2015: 89.5Iowa, 2016: 89.4Iowa, 2017: 89.2Iowa, 2018: 91.8Iowa, 2019: 91.8Iowa, 2020: 90.6Iowa, 2021: 89.8Iowa, 2022: 88.4Iowa, 2023: 88.8Iowa, 2024: 87.8201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 30National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefIowa · Iowa establishes a child care and workforce task force · 2021-03-10Iowa child care task forceNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockIowa · Iowa approves an omnibus law with six item vetoes · 2026-06-02Iowa omnibus approvalIowa · Iowa omnibus school, sanitation and workforce provisions take effect · 2026-07-01Iowa July provisions● Iowa Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · 2◆ Governor · 3■ Iowa agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-07-31

7 of 7 reviewed Iowa actions match · 7 date markers shown. 30 major events shown separately.

Iowa · 2024: 87.8 · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Iowa with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Iowa All-items price level · source units
PeriodIowaRankU.S. benchmark
202487.8#48 of 50100
202388.8#44 of 50100
202288.4#46 of 50100
202189.8#45 of 50100
202090.6#43 of 50100
201991.8#41 of 50100
201891.8#38 of 50100
201789.2#45 of 50100
201689.4#47 of 50100
201589.5#47 of 50100
201491#45 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Iowa · state comparison

How does Iowa’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Iowa · 202487.8
Iowa rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Iowa with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
All-items price level history in Iowa85.993.9101.820142024
2024 · Iowa: 87.8 · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa All-items price level history
PeriodIowaCompare
201491
201589.5
201689.4
201789.2
201891.8
201991.8
202090.6
202189.8
202288.4
202388.8
202487.8

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 87.82024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa · your comparison87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Iowa · 20241.5%
Iowa rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Iowa-2.6%2.6%7.7%20152024
2024 · Iowa: 1.5% · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodIowaCompare
2015-1.4%
20160.9%
20171.5%
20185%
20191.4%
2020-0.2%
20213.1%
20224.9%
20234.3%
20241.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 1.5%2024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa · your comparison1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Iowa · 2024$60,144
Iowa rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Real personal income per person history in Iowa$45.79K$53.9K$62.02K20142024
2024 · Iowa: $60,144 · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Real personal income per person history
PeriodIowaCompare
2014$50,001
2015$52,254
2016$52,065
2017$52,544
2018$52,172
2019$52,372
2020$55,696
2021$59,666
2022$59,743
2023$58,646
2024$60,144

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · $60,1442024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa · your comparison$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Iowa candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

25 statements from 10 candidates

2026 Iowa Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 11 statements

Dave Muhlbauer

8 statements

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · IA

CPI / inflation mention

Increase the minimum wage: Iowa has one of the lowest minimum wages in the country at just $7.25/hour. The last time it was increased was in 2008 – nearly 20 years ago! Iowans could move to any of our neighboring states to make more money or have access to better opportunities. In fact, we have the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Truer Better Agenda: Opportunities for All

Candidate campaign source

Increase the minimum wage: Iowa has one of the lowest minimum wages in the country at just $7.25/hour. The last time it was increased was in 2008 – nearly 20 years ago! Iowans could move to any of our neighboring states to make more money or have access to better opportunities. In fact, we have the lowest minimum wage in the Midwest. We need to increase the minimum wage to keep Iowa workers here at home with good-paying, family-supporting jobs and to keep up with inflation and the sky-high cost of living. I support raising the minimum wage to $12/hour.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
View 7 more statements from Dave Muhlbauer
CPI / inflation mention

Implementing rules and transparency for the private school voucher program: The current school voucher program is an open invitation to waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer dollars. This school year alone, the voucher program is estimated to cost taxpayers $350 million meant for our public schools to…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Implementing rules and transparency for the private school voucher program: The current school voucher program is an open invitation to waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer dollars. This school year alone, the voucher program is estimated to cost taxpayers $350 million meant for our public schools to unaccountable private schools, while funding for public schools isn’t keeping up with inflation . We need to ensure public oversight over public dollars. I support:

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 5 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Lowering Energy Costs:

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Lowering Energy Costs:

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

That means that while costs have skyrocketed across the country on everything from groceries to housing costs to utility bills, Iowans are the ones being hit the hardest, with less money in their pockets to cover those higher costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

That means that while costs have skyrocketed across the country on everything from groceries to housing costs to utility bills, Iowans are the ones being hit the hardest, with less money in their pockets to cover those higher costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Promote affordable renewables : We need to maintain and grow incentives for clean energy that directly saves consumers money and improves our health. This ensures Iowans’ ability to sell excess solar and offset utility costs with low-cost renewables. Utah’s plug-in solar model is a good one to base …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Promote affordable renewables : We need to maintain and grow incentives for clean energy that directly saves consumers money and improves our health. This ensures Iowans’ ability to sell excess solar and offset utility costs with low-cost renewables. Utah’s plug-in solar model is a good one to base this off of to help lower energy costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Invest and expand in renewable energy production : But without sacrificing agriculture production to lower costs of energy for farmers and for the communities where they live. We can do this by leveraging federal programs to lower energy costs for rural areas and on renewable energy, and working wit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Invest and expand in renewable energy production : But without sacrificing agriculture production to lower costs of energy for farmers and for the communities where they live. We can do this by leveraging federal programs to lower energy costs for rural areas and on renewable energy, and working with Renewable Electric Cooperatives (RECs), which administer the programs and buy excess energy from farmers who own turbines. This spreads economic benefits and lowers electricity rates for Iowans, increasing energy supply. As governor, I would advocate for the expansion of community credit though public-private partnerships, with 65% mandated to go to farmers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Lowering Housing Costs:

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Lowering Housing Costs:

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Traveling the state as part of my 100 Town Hall Tour, I hear it constantly: the cost of living is just too high.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Traveling the state as part of my 100 Town Hall Tour, I hear it constantly: the cost of living is just too high.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗

Rob Sand

3 statements

Democratic · Governor · IA

CPI / inflation mention

Increase the minimum wage: Iowa has one of the lowest minimum wages in the country at just $7.25/hour. The last time it was increased was in 2008 – nearly 20 years ago! Iowans could move to any of our neighboring states to make more money or have access to better opportunities. In fact, we have the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Increase the minimum wage: Iowa has one of the lowest minimum wages in the country at just $7.25/hour. The last time it was increased was in 2008 – nearly 20 years ago! Iowans could move to any of our neighboring states to make more money or have access to better opportunities. In fact, we have the lowest minimum wage in the Midwest. We need to increase the minimum wage to keep Iowa workers here at home with good-paying, family-supporting jobs and to keep up with inflation and the sky-high cost of living. I support raising the minimum wage to $12/hour.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
View 2 more statements from Rob Sand
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

I’ve been hearing it on the road already on this year’s 100 Town Hall Tour at many stops: data centers. They’re popping up in our communities, threatening to raise energy and utility costs along the way. The surge of data centers moving in across our state requires further accountability and transpa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, utilities, and data centers

Candidate campaign source

I’ve been hearing it on the road already on this year’s 100 Town Hall Tour at many stops: data centers. They’re popping up in our communities, threatening to raise energy and utility costs along the way. The surge of data centers moving in across our state requires further accountability and transparency, and our leaders must put Iowa taxpayers and ratepayers – not these huge corporations – first.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Invest and expand in renewable energy production: But without sacrificing agriculture production to lower costs of energy for farmers and for the communities where they live. We can do this by leveraging federal programs to lower energy costs for rural areas and on renewable energy, and working with…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Invest and expand in renewable energy production: But without sacrificing agriculture production to lower costs of energy for farmers and for the communities where they live. We can do this by leveraging federal programs to lower energy costs for rural areas and on renewable energy, and working with Renewable Electric Cooperatives (RECs), which administer the programs and buy excess energy from farmers who own turbines. This spreads economic benefits and lowers electricity rates for Iowans, increasing energy supply. As governor, I would advocate for the expansion of community credit though public-private partnerships, with 65% mandated to go to farmers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗

2026 Iowa U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Christina Bohannan

5 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · IA

CPI / inflation mention

Hold drug companies accountable for price gouging by imposing tougher penalties for raising prices faster than inflation

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Hold drug companies accountable for price gouging by imposing tougher penalties for raising prices faster than inflation

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 4 more statements from Christina Bohannan
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Expand the number of drugs for which Medicare can negotiate lower prices and extend those lower negotiated prices to Iowans on private insurance

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Expand the number of drugs for which Medicare can negotiate lower prices and extend those lower negotiated prices to Iowans on private insurance

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Lowering prescription drug prices by allowing Medicare to negotiate for lower prices on more lifesaving drugs and capping insulin costs at $35 per month for everyone

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Lowering prescription drug prices by allowing Medicare to negotiate for lower prices on more lifesaving drugs and capping insulin costs at $35 per month for everyone

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Allow Medicare to negotiate for lower prices on more drugs so seniors and other taxpayers pay less

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Allow Medicare to negotiate for lower prices on more drugs so seniors and other taxpayers pay less

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Cracking down on utility monopolies and expanding Iowa’s clean energy economy to lower energy bills

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Cracking down on utility monopolies and expanding Iowa’s clean energy economy to lower energy bills

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christina Bohannan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Iowa U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Joe Mitchell

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · IA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Now running for Congress, Joe is concerned about the rising cost of living and the growing challenges facing working families. Too many young people are unable to buy a home, unlikely to start a family, or even put down roots in the communities where they grew up. Joe believes Iowa should be a place…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, housing, and government reform

Candidate campaign source

Now running for Congress, Joe is concerned about the rising cost of living and the growing challenges facing working families. Too many young people are unable to buy a home, unlikely to start a family, or even put down roots in the communities where they grew up. Joe believes Iowa should be a place where the next generation can afford to stay, build a career, and achieve the American Dream.He supports term limits for members of Congress, banning congressional stock trading, and refuses to accept corporate PAC money because elected officials should answer to voters—not special interests. He is willing to challenge the status quo because he’s not a career politician and doesn’t seek the approval of the political establishment.Joe is committed to tackling the issues that matter most to Iowans: lowering costs, expanding homeownership, supporting small businesses, strengthening rural communities, and restoring trust in government. He believes the American Dream can once again be attainable to the next generation, but only if we make serious changes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joe Mitchell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Iowa candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Iowa incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Iowa legislators and Iowa’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Iowa’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Iowa incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Zachary Nunn

U.S. House of Representatives, Iowa District 3 · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Zachary Nunn
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · HR 1339

Safeguarding Social Security and Medicare Act

Feb 13, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Zachary Nunn · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 1339 would require a GAO study of inflation and living-cost effects on Social Security and Medicare and recommendations on providing full benefits. The Social Security portion explicitly addresses OASDI. It orders a study rather than changing eligibility, benefit amounts or the number of beneficiaries.

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. The proposal requires a study and recommendations concerning OASDI and Medicare. Only its OASDI portion relates to this beneficiary count; it does not change payments, eligibility or the number of beneficiaries. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Iowa residents receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Study on social security and medicareNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall conduct a study and submit a report to Congress on the following: (1)The effect of inflation and cost of living increases on Medicare and the Old-Age Survivor and Disability Insurance program under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). (2)Recommendations on any legislative actions necessary to improve the ability to provide full benefits under such programs.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Joni Ernst

U.S. Senate, Iowa · R–IA

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Joni Ernst
U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · S 2591

Ethanol for America Act of 2025

Jul 31, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Joni Ernst · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 2591 would require EPA to finalize the specified E15 dispenser-labeling and storage-compatibility rule within 90 days of enactment. It would deem existing underground storage systems compliant with blends up to 15 percent ethanol even without installation or compatibility documents. Systems and components installed or replaced after the rule’s effective date for on-road motor fuel would have to accommodate blends up to 100 percent ethanol. These are regulatory compatibility rules, without establishing a gasoline-price reduction.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering fifteen states including Iowa. Iowa policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Iowa statewide average. Exempt off-road fuels and high-ethanol blends are distinct from regular gasoline. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Iowa evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Finalization of proposed rule required(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)AdministratorThe term Administrator means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.(2)Proposed ruleThe term proposed rule means the proposed rule of the Administrator entitled E15 Fuel Dispenser Labeling and Compatibility with Underground Storage Tanks (86 Fed. Reg. 5094 (January 19, 2021)).(b)Finalization requiredNot later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall finalize the proposed rule in accordance with this section.(c)E15 labeling requirementsIn finalizing the proposed rule pursuant to subsection (b) with respect to E15 labeling, the Administrator shall finalize the first co-proposal described in the proposed rule.(d)E15 compatibility with underground storage tanks(1)E15 compatibilityIn finalizing the proposed rule pursuant to subsection (b) with respect to the compatibility of underground storage tanks with fuel blends with up to 15 percent ethanol, the Administrator shall ensure that—(A)existing underground storage tank systems are deemed to be compliant with fuel blends with up to 15 percent ethanol, regardless of whether the owners or operators of those systems are able to locate installation or compatibility documentation for those systems;(B)steel and fiberglass underground storage tanks manufactured after July 2005 and all fiberglass reinforced plastic piping are considered compatible with fuel blends of up to 15 percent ethanol; and(C)if owners or operators of underground storage tank systems can demonstrate the compatibility of certain components of those systems (such as gaskets or seals) with fuel blends with up to 15 percent ethanol, those owners or operators are not required to replace other equipment to achieve full system compatibility.(2)Future storage flexibilityFor purposes of ensuring that gasoline and diesel underground storage tank systems have future flexibility in fuel storage, the Administrator, in finalizing the proposed rule pursuant to subsection (b), shall require owners and operators of underground storage tank systems that store motor fuel for on-road vehicles to ensure that those systems and the components of those systems, including components such as pipe dopes and sealants, that are installed or replaced after the effective date of the proposed rule are compatible with fuel blends with up to 100 percent ethanol, regardless of the types of fuel blends currently being stored in those systems.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Iowa officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Iowa statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.