Idaho · individual fact

Idaho real gross domestic product

Idaho’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$103.62B2025 · #38 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth3.1%2025 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$137.4B2025 · #38 of 50 · highest first

Idaho over time

Explore Idaho readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Idaho officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Idaho effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Idaho change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Idaho · source units
IdahoPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $103.62B$0$13.4T$26.81TIdaho, 2014: $66.78BIdaho, 2015: $67.79BIdaho, 2016: $70.44BIdaho, 2017: $72.94BIdaho, 2018: $77.61BIdaho, 2019: $81.09BIdaho, 2020: $82.58BIdaho, 2021: $90.57BIdaho, 2022: $94.17BIdaho, 2023: $96.55BIdaho, 2024: $100.55BIdaho, 2025: $103.62B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 29National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● Idaho Legislature · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.● U.S. Congress · Idaho delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Idaho agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

0 of 0 reviewed Idaho actions match · 0 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

Idaho · 2025: $103.62B · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Idaho Real GDP · source units
PeriodIdahoRankU.S. benchmark
2025$103.62B#38 of 50$23.94T
2024$100.55B#38 of 50$23.39T
2023$96.55B#38 of 50$22.72T
2022$94.17B#38 of 50$22.08T
2021$90.57B#39 of 50$21.56T
2020$82.58B#39 of 50$20.28T
2019$81.09B#40 of 50$20.72T
2018$77.61B#40 of 50$20.19T
2017$72.94B#41 of 50$19.61T
2016$70.44B#42 of 50$19.14T
2015$67.79B#42 of 50$18.8T
2014$66.78B#42 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Idaho · state comparison

Idaho output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Idaho · 2025$103.62B
Idaho rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Idaho
Real GDP history in Idaho$-3.51T$12.01T$27.52T20142025
2025 · Idaho: $103.62B · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Idaho Real GDP history
PeriodIdahoCompare
2014$66.78B
2015$67.79B
2016$70.44B
2017$72.94B
2018$77.61B
2019$81.09B
2020$82.58B
2021$90.57B
2022$94.17B
2023$96.55B
2024$100.55B
2025$103.62B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Idaho · $103.62B2025 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho · your comparison$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Idaho · state comparison

What makes up Idaho GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Idaho’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Idaho · 2025$5.41B
Idaho rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Idaho
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Idaho$-40.3B$148.35B$337.01B20142025
2025 · Idaho: $5.41B · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Idaho Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodIdahoCompare
2014$3.95B
2015$3.62B
2016$3.48B
2017$3.23B
2018$3.62B
2019$3.73B
2020$3.65B
2021$4B
2022$5.82B
2023$5.2B
2024$5.01B
2025$5.41B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Idaho · $5.41B2025 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho · your comparison$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Idaho · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Idaho · 20251,238,642
Idaho rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Idaho
Total employment · jobs history in Idaho-31,683,835109,625,337250,934,50920142025
2025 · Idaho: 1,238,642 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Idaho Total employment · jobs history
PeriodIdahoCompare
2014925,974
2015949,932
2016977,486
20171,008,856
20181,042,724
20191,065,205
20201,079,919
20211,139,821
20221,183,118
20231,206,698
20241,223,366
20251,238,642

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Idaho stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Idaho has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Idaho · 1,238,6422025 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Idaho with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho · your comparison1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Idaho candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

4 statements from 4 candidates

2026 Idaho U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Kaylee Peterson

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · ID

Economic growth & production context

True land conservation requires proactive stewardship, not neglect. Kaylee is committed to working hand-in-hand with Idaho’s Forest Service and federal agencies to ensure they are fully staffed, adequately funded, and equipped to clear the massive maintenance backlogs facing our public tracts. By re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, natural resources, and energy

Candidate campaign source

True land conservation requires proactive stewardship, not neglect. Kaylee is committed to working hand-in-hand with Idaho’s Forest Service and federal agencies to ensure they are fully staffed, adequately funded, and equipped to clear the massive maintenance backlogs facing our public tracts. By responsibly investing in expanding existing infrastructure and scaling local timber markets, we can protect our wilderness while driving strong, sustainable economic growth.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kaylee Peterson — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Idaho U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Mike Simpson

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · ID

Economic growth & production context

Fundamental tax reform is a critical component of any plan to address our nation’s debt crisis once and for all. If we truly want to get our budget deficit under control, we need to get our economy going again. Unfortunately, our tax system hampers economic growth, forcing the average American famil…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Provide Tax Relief and Certainty to American Families

Candidate campaign source

Fundamental tax reform is a critical component of any plan to address our nation’s debt crisis once and for all. If we truly want to get our budget deficit under control, we need to get our economy going again. Unfortunately, our tax system hampers economic growth, forcing the average American family to pay more in taxes than it spends on food, shelter, and clothing combined.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Mike Simpson campaign source 14 ↗

2026 Idaho U.S. Senate — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Natalie Fleming

1 statement

Independent · U.S. Senate · ID

Economic growth & production context

I believe in self-reliance in feeding and powering ourselves responsibly. We will invest in regenerative energy, strengthen domestic production, and protect rural infrastructure. A secure nation grows its own food, powers its own homes, and stands on its own two feet.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, natural resources, and energy

Candidate campaign source

I believe in self-reliance in feeding and powering ourselves responsibly. We will invest in regenerative energy, strengthen domestic production, and protect rural infrastructure. A secure nation grows its own food, powers its own homes, and stands on its own two feet.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Natalie Fleming — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Todd Achilles

1 statement

Independent · U.S. Senate · ID

Economic growth & production context

I will support agricultural research, innovation, and science-based regulation that strengthen food safety, improve productivity, and give Idaho producers access to safe, effective tools and new technologies.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Strengthen Public Schools

Candidate campaign source

I will support agricultural research, innovation, and science-based regulation that strengthen food safety, improve productivity, and give Idaho producers access to safe, effective tools and new technologies.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Todd Achilles campaign source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Idaho candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Idaho incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Idaho legislators and Idaho’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Idaho’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 Idaho incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.

What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Idaho officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Idaho statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.