Hawaii · individual fact

Hawaii health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages3.5%2024 · #49 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 654.3%2024 · #49 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6576.2%2024 · #9 of 50 · highest first

Hawaii over time

Explore Hawaii readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Hawaii officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Hawaii effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Hawaii change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Hawaii · source units
HawaiiPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 3.5%2.2%5.7%9.2%Hawaii, 2014: 5.3%Hawaii, 2015: 4%Hawaii, 2016: 3.5%Hawaii, 2017: 3.8%Hawaii, 2018: 4.1%Hawaii, 2019: 4.2%Hawaii, 2021: 3.9%Hawaii, 2022: 3.5%Hawaii, 2023: 3.2%Hawaii, 2024: 3.5%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 22National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)Hawaii · Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices · 2025-04-22Firearm-storage lawNational context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Hawaii Legislature · 4● U.S. Congress · Hawaii delegation · 3◆ Governor · 2■ Hawaii agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-06-30

9 of 9 reviewed Hawaii actions match · 9 date markers shown. 22 major events shown separately.

Hawaii · 2024: 3.5% · Rank #49 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Hawaii Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodHawaiiRankU.S. benchmark
20243.5%#49 of 508.2%
20233.2%#49 of 50Not available
20223.5%#49 of 50Not available
20213.9%#48 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20194.2%#48 of 50Not available
20184.1%#47 of 50Not available
20173.8%#49 of 50Not available
20163.5%#49 of 50Not available
20154%#48 of 50Not available
20145.3%#48 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Hawaii · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Hawaii · 20243.5%
Hawaii rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Hawaii
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Hawaii2.5%5.7%9%20142024
2024 · Hawaii: 3.5% · Rank #49 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Hawaii Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodHawaiiCompare
20145.3%
20154%
20163.5%
20173.8%
20184.1%
20194.2%
2020Not available
20213.9%
20223.5%
20233.2%
20243.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · 3.5%2024 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii · your comparison3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

4.3%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Hawaii’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
Hawaii · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Hawaii with every state.

Hawaii · 2020$10,291
Hawaii rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Hawaii
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Hawaii$6.76K$8.76K$10.75K20142020
2020 · Hawaii: $10,291 · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Hawaii Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodHawaiiCompare
2014$7,224
2015$7,747
2016$8,041
2017$8,496
2018$8,932
2019$9,555
2020$10,291

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · $10,2912020 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii · your comparison$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Hawaii · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Hawaii · 202280 years
Hawaii rank#1among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Hawaii population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Hawaii
Life expectancy at birth history in Hawaii77 years79.3 years81.5 years20182022
2022 · Hawaii: 80 years · Rank #1 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Hawaii Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodHawaiiCompare
201881 years
201980.9 years
202080.7 years
202179.9 years
202280 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · 80 years2022 · Rank #1 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii · your comparison80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Hawaii · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Hawaii · 20239.5%
Hawaii rank#31among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Hawaii
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Hawaii7.7%9.5%11.2%20192023
2023 · Hawaii: 9.5% · Rank #31 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Hawaii Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodHawaiiCompare
20199.3%
20209.5%
20218.1%
202210.4%
20239.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · 9.5%2023 · Rank #31 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 8.7% – 10.5%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii · your comparison9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Hawaii · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Hawaii · June 30, 202667.1%
Hawaii rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · 67.1%June 30, 2026 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii · your comparison67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Hawaii · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Hawaii · 2020$7,040
Hawaii rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · $7,0402020 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii · your comparison$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Hawaii · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Hawaii · 2023–202419.8%
Hawaii rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Hawaii stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Hawaii has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Hawaii · 19.8%2023–2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Hawaii with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii · your comparison19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Hawaii candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

27 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Hawaii Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 16 statements

Daniel Anthony

15 statements

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · HI

Care & public health

Encourage investments in wastewater systems, stormwater management, erosion control, and other infrastructure that protects public health and environmental quality.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Environment, energy, water, and resilience

Candidate campaign source

Encourage investments in wastewater systems, stormwater management, erosion control, and other infrastructure that protects public health and environmental quality.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
View 14 more statements from Daniel Anthony
Care & public health

Healthcare workforce vacancy rates

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare workforce vacancy rates

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Encourage innovative approaches that bring healthcare services closer to patients and reduce unnecessary barriers to care.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Encourage innovative approaches that bring healthcare services closer to patients and reduce unnecessary barriers to care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Primary care provider availability

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Primary care provider availability

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Hawaiʻi should strengthen its healthcare workforce, improve access across all islands, expand mental health services, and focus on prevention and early intervention that improve long-term health outcomes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Hawaiʻi should strengthen its healthcare workforce, improve access across all islands, expand mental health services, and focus on prevention and early intervention that improve long-term health outcomes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Daniel believes healthcare should focus on access, outcomes, prevention, and community well-being.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Daniel believes healthcare should focus on access, outcomes, prevention, and community well-being.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Support programs that encourage healthy lifestyles, preventative care, chronic disease management, and community health education.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Support programs that encourage healthy lifestyles, preventative care, chronic disease management, and community health education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Support pathways that encourage local students to pursue healthcare careers and remain in Hawaiʻi.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Support pathways that encourage local students to pursue healthcare careers and remain in Hawaiʻi.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Provide the public with clear information about healthcare access, provider shortages, service availability, and healthcare system performance.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Provide the public with clear information about healthcare access, provider shortages, service availability, and healthcare system performance.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Work with healthcare providers, educational institutions, and licensing agencies to address workforce shortages and improve recruitment and retention.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Work with healthcare providers, educational institutions, and licensing agencies to address workforce shortages and improve recruitment and retention.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Mental health provider availability

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Mental health provider availability

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Healthcare affordability indicators

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare affordability indicators

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Expand access to mental health care, crisis services, counseling, and community-based support systems.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Expand access to mental health care, crisis services, counseling, and community-based support systems.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Support healthcare delivery systems that improve access for residents in underserved and rural communities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Support healthcare delivery systems that improve access for residents in underserved and rural communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

Neighbor island healthcare access

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Neighbor island healthcare access

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Daniel Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗

Josh Green

1 statement

Democratic · Governor · HI

Health coverage

Governor Josh Green is lowering healthcare costs for everyone in Hawaii by covering Obamacare subsidies for families who count on them, and bringing nearly $1 billion in federal investments for rural health statewide — so Hawaii families don’t have to choose between paying the rent or buying the med…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Governor Josh Green is lowering healthcare costs for everyone in Hawaii by covering Obamacare subsidies for families who count on them, and bringing nearly $1 billion in federal investments for rural health statewide — so Hawaii families don’t have to choose between paying the rent or buying the medicine their children need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Josh Green — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗

2026 Hawaii U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Ed Case

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · HI

Health coverage

Fulfill Our Promises We must preserve and strengthen Social Security and Medicare and fulfill our commitments to our veterans and others.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agenda for a Better Hawai‘i, Country and World

Candidate campaign source

Fulfill Our Promises We must preserve and strengthen Social Security and Medicare and fulfill our commitments to our veterans and others.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ed Case — campaign source ↗
View 3 more statements from Ed Case
Health coverage

My goal is to preserve the best of American health care while closing the unacceptable gaps in availability, affordability, access and quality. It is critical to get this right for current and future generations, and I believe we need a renewed national debate, including within Congress, on how best…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Share by Email

Candidate campaign source

My goal is to preserve the best of American health care while closing the unacceptable gaps in availability, affordability, access and quality. It is critical to get this right for current and future generations, and I believe we need a renewed national debate, including within Congress, on how best to do so. That is why it is critical for Congress to remain focused on protecting and improving the Affordable Care Act, lowering prescription drug prices and increasing investments in biomedical research. You can view a summary of my efforts in healthcare here (https://case.house.gov/uploadedfiles/healthcare_leg_history.pdf).

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ed Case campaign source 8 ↗
Care & public health

I believe that our federal budget should not be, as it has become, a routine exercise, but instead a document and agenda that comprehensively address our nation’s needs and expenses in a fiscally sustainable way. We have urgent challenges, from climate change to health care and beyond, and we need a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fiscal Accountability

Candidate campaign source

I believe that our federal budget should not be, as it has become, a routine exercise, but instead a document and agenda that comprehensively address our nation’s needs and expenses in a fiscally sustainable way. We have urgent challenges, from climate change to health care and beyond, and we need a full and difficult debate on how best to balance their cost with our ability and commitment to raise and allocate scarce resources.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ed Case campaign source 14 ↗
Care & public health

Care For Ourselves We must assure available healthcare and help our fellow citizens in need.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agenda for a Better Hawai‘i, Country and World

Candidate campaign source

Care For Ourselves We must assure available healthcare and help our fellow citizens in need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Ed Case — campaign source ↗

Jordan S. Conley

2 statements

Green · U.S. House District 1 · HI

Care & public health

Establish universal health care so everyone has access to health services.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

Establish universal health care so everyone has access to health services.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Jordan S. Conley — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Jordan S. Conley
Care & public health

Universal Health Care

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Universal Health Care

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Jordan S. Conley — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Nonpartisan · U.S. House District 1 · HI

Care & public health

I oppose abortion. I also believe being pro-life must mean more than telling a frightened woman what she should not do. It must mean standing beside her and making it possible to keep the child she already loves—with practical support surrounding pregnancy, birth, housing, healthcare, childcare, wor…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Five Fights

Candidate campaign source

I oppose abortion. I also believe being pro-life must mean more than telling a frightened woman what she should not do. It must mean standing beside her and making it possible to keep the child she already loves—with practical support surrounding pregnancy, birth, housing, healthcare, childcare, work, and family stability.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Nathan M. Berning campaign source ↗

2026 Hawaii U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Jill N. Tokuda

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · HI

Health coverage

In addition, I was proud to stand with many of my colleagues to sponsor the Medicare for All Act of 2023. Getting sick or injured should never be the reason why someone goes into crippling debt. Healthcare is a human right, and I will continue to fight for this critical legislation until equitable h…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

In addition, I was proud to stand with many of my colleagues to sponsor the Medicare for All Act of 2023. Getting sick or injured should never be the reason why someone goes into crippling debt. Healthcare is a human right, and I will continue to fight for this critical legislation until equitable healthcare is a reality for all.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jill N. Tokuda — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 3 more statements from Jill N. Tokuda
Care & public health

Our communities need improved access to healthcare and mental health services. Your zip code or the size of your paycheck should not dictate what services you are able to access or the quality of care you receive.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Our communities need improved access to healthcare and mental health services. Your zip code or the size of your paycheck should not dictate what services you are able to access or the quality of care you receive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jill N. Tokuda — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

In my first term in Congress, I continued that vow and opposed all efforts by the House Republican majority to further restrict women’s healthcare, including by limiting access to mifepristone. I also cosponsored The Women’s Health Protection Act which would codify the right to abortion care and the…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

In my first term in Congress, I continued that vow and opposed all efforts by the House Republican majority to further restrict women’s healthcare, including by limiting access to mifepristone. I also cosponsored The Women’s Health Protection Act which would codify the right to abortion care and the Right to Contraception Act which prevents federal, state, and local government entities from restricting access to or inhibiting the sale of contraceptives. Everyone should have access to the reproductive healthcare they need, and I will keep fighting until every person has the freedom to make decisions about their own body, life, and future, without interference from politicians.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jill N. Tokuda — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

Our efforts are focused on areas like expanding the capacity of rural hospitals and increasing the number of healthcare professionals through innovative approaches, such as mobile health clinics and enhanced telehealth services.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Our efforts are focused on areas like expanding the capacity of rural hospitals and increasing the number of healthcare professionals through innovative approaches, such as mobile health clinics and enhanced telehealth services.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jill N. Tokuda — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Hawaii candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Hawaii incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Hawaii legislators and Hawaii’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Hawaii’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

31 matching sponsorships or proposals · 26 Hawaii incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Adrian K. Tam

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 24 · D–HI

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Adrian K. Tam
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1875

RELATING TO HEALTH CARE.

May 29, 2026 · Enacted · Act 59

Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Linda Ichiyama · Sponsored / Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1875 creates civil remedies for litigation targeting reproductive or gender-affirming care lawful in Hawaii, including injunctions, damages and litigation costs. Actions must be filed within six years after the abusive litigation begins or enforcement of its order or judgment is attempted. Standard payer actions concerning coverage, fraud, waste and lawful contract enforcement remain permitted. Malpractice insurers cannot refuse, cancel or decline renewal solely for providing, assisting or referring qualifying care consistent with accepted practice standards and Hawaii law; the listed sanctions and rate increases are prohibited when unsupported by the specified actuarial analysis. Health plans and insurers cannot terminate or refuse to renew participating-provider contracts solely because the provider provides or assists in the covered care. The abortion connection concerns reproductive-care protections, not every service covered by the law or proof of increased access.

Act 59, approved 2026-05-29. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts reported abortions occurring in Hawaii, regardless of patient residence. Provider permissions and protections concern access to that care; they do not measure residents receiving care elsewhere. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 323J, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding three new sections to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§323J- Abusive litigation; prohibited; remedies. (a) If a person or entity, whether or not acting under the color of law, engages in or attempts to engage in abusive litigation, or attempts to enforce any order or judgment issued in connection with any abusive litigation, any aggrieved person may bring a civil action against that person or entity in the circuit court of the circuit in which the aggrieved person resides or in which the aggrieved person accessed, received, provided, facilitated, or attempted to access, receive provide, or facilitate reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services. The civil actions may be for: (1) Injunctive relief; (2) Actual damages, including the amount of any judgment issued in connection with the abusive litigation; (3) Expenses, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the abusive litigation; (4) Expenses, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred to bring an action under this section; and (5) Punitive damages. (b) Any civil action filed pursuant to this section shall be filed within six years after the date the abusive litigation is commenced, or if the person or entity is attempting to enforce an order or a judgment, within six years after the date enforcement is attempted. (c) Notwithstanding any provision of this section, the requirements set forth herein shall not apply to prohibit standard health care actions or activities of a health payor regarding insurance coverage status, fraud, waste, or lawful activities of a health payor to enforce its rights under a contract with a person or entity. (d) For the purposes of this section: "Abusive litigation" means any litigation or other legal action, including civil, criminal, or administrative action, brought against another person or entity for accessing, receiving, providing, facilitating, or attempting to access, receive, provide, or facilitate reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services that are lawful under the laws of this State. "Aggrieved person" means: (1) A person or entity against whom abusive litigation is filed or prosecuted or against whom an order or judgment issued in connection with such abusive litigation is attempted to be enforced; or (2) The employer or principal of a person against whom abusive litigation is filed or prosecuted or against whom an order or a judgment issued in connection with such abusive litigation is attempted to be enforced if the action that forms the basis of the abusive litigation was performed within the scope of the person's employment or agency relationship. §323J- Medical malpractice insurance; prohibited actions. (a) Any insurer that issues medical malpractice insurance in this State shall not take a prohibited action against an applicant for, or the named insured under, a medical malpractice policy in this State solely because the applicant or insured has provided, or assisted in the provision of, reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services or made a referral for reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services; provided that the care provided by the applicant or insured was consistent with generally accepted standards of practice under the laws of this State and did not otherwise violate the laws of this State. (b) For the purposes of this section, "prohibited action" means: (1) Refusing to issue a medical malpractice policy; (2) Canceling or terminating a medical malpractice policy; (3) Refusing to renew a medical malpractice policy; or (4) Imposing any sanctions, fines, penalties, or rate increases that are not supported by actuarial analysis conducted in accordance with the applicable Actuarial Standards of Practice promulgated by the Actuarial Standards Board. §323J- Health carriers; prohibitions. No group health plan or health insurance insurer offering or renewing a health plan in this State shall terminate or refuse to renew a health care contract with a participating health care provider on the sole basis that the participating provider provides, or assists in the provision of, reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services."
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Hawaii Legislature · HB 125

Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22

Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored

Reviewed final Hawaii law

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.

Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The purpose of this Act is to protect public safety by providing for the safe and secure storage of firearms.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Amy A. Perruso

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 46 · D–HI

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Amy A. Perruso
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1875

RELATING TO HEALTH CARE.

May 29, 2026 · Enacted · Act 59

Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Linda Ichiyama · Sponsored / Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1875 creates civil remedies for litigation targeting reproductive or gender-affirming care lawful in Hawaii, including injunctions, damages and litigation costs. Actions must be filed within six years after the abusive litigation begins or enforcement of its order or judgment is attempted. Standard payer actions concerning coverage, fraud, waste and lawful contract enforcement remain permitted. Malpractice insurers cannot refuse, cancel or decline renewal solely for providing, assisting or referring qualifying care consistent with accepted practice standards and Hawaii law; the listed sanctions and rate increases are prohibited when unsupported by the specified actuarial analysis. Health plans and insurers cannot terminate or refuse to renew participating-provider contracts solely because the provider provides or assists in the covered care. The abortion connection concerns reproductive-care protections, not every service covered by the law or proof of increased access.

Act 59, approved 2026-05-29. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts reported abortions occurring in Hawaii, regardless of patient residence. Provider permissions and protections concern access to that care; they do not measure residents receiving care elsewhere. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 323J, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding three new sections to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§323J- Abusive litigation; prohibited; remedies. (a) If a person or entity, whether or not acting under the color of law, engages in or attempts to engage in abusive litigation, or attempts to enforce any order or judgment issued in connection with any abusive litigation, any aggrieved person may bring a civil action against that person or entity in the circuit court of the circuit in which the aggrieved person resides or in which the aggrieved person accessed, received, provided, facilitated, or attempted to access, receive provide, or facilitate reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services. The civil actions may be for: (1) Injunctive relief; (2) Actual damages, including the amount of any judgment issued in connection with the abusive litigation; (3) Expenses, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the abusive litigation; (4) Expenses, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred to bring an action under this section; and (5) Punitive damages. (b) Any civil action filed pursuant to this section shall be filed within six years after the date the abusive litigation is commenced, or if the person or entity is attempting to enforce an order or a judgment, within six years after the date enforcement is attempted. (c) Notwithstanding any provision of this section, the requirements set forth herein shall not apply to prohibit standard health care actions or activities of a health payor regarding insurance coverage status, fraud, waste, or lawful activities of a health payor to enforce its rights under a contract with a person or entity. (d) For the purposes of this section: "Abusive litigation" means any litigation or other legal action, including civil, criminal, or administrative action, brought against another person or entity for accessing, receiving, providing, facilitating, or attempting to access, receive, provide, or facilitate reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services that are lawful under the laws of this State. "Aggrieved person" means: (1) A person or entity against whom abusive litigation is filed or prosecuted or against whom an order or judgment issued in connection with such abusive litigation is attempted to be enforced; or (2) The employer or principal of a person against whom abusive litigation is filed or prosecuted or against whom an order or a judgment issued in connection with such abusive litigation is attempted to be enforced if the action that forms the basis of the abusive litigation was performed within the scope of the person's employment or agency relationship. §323J- Medical malpractice insurance; prohibited actions. (a) Any insurer that issues medical malpractice insurance in this State shall not take a prohibited action against an applicant for, or the named insured under, a medical malpractice policy in this State solely because the applicant or insured has provided, or assisted in the provision of, reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services or made a referral for reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services; provided that the care provided by the applicant or insured was consistent with generally accepted standards of practice under the laws of this State and did not otherwise violate the laws of this State. (b) For the purposes of this section, "prohibited action" means: (1) Refusing to issue a medical malpractice policy; (2) Canceling or terminating a medical malpractice policy; (3) Refusing to renew a medical malpractice policy; or (4) Imposing any sanctions, fines, penalties, or rate increases that are not supported by actuarial analysis conducted in accordance with the applicable Actuarial Standards of Practice promulgated by the Actuarial Standards Board. §323J- Health carriers; prohibitions. No group health plan or health insurance insurer offering or renewing a health plan in this State shall terminate or refuse to renew a health care contract with a participating health care provider on the sole basis that the participating provider provides, or assists in the provision of, reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services."
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Hawaii Legislature · HB 125

Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22

Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored

Reviewed final Hawaii law

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.

Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The purpose of this Act is to protect public safety by providing for the safe and secure storage of firearms.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David A. Tarnas

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 8 · D–HI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David A. Tarnas
Hawaii Legislature · HB 125

Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22

Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored

Reviewed final Hawaii law

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.

Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The purpose of this Act is to protect public safety by providing for the safe and secure storage of firearms.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Della Au Belatti

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 26 · D–HI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Della Au Belatti
Hawaii Legislature · HB 125

Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22

Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored

Reviewed final Hawaii law

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.

Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The purpose of this Act is to protect public safety by providing for the safe and secure storage of firearms.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Gregg Takayama

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 34 · D–HI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Gregg Takayama
Hawaii Legislature · HB 125

Hawaii approves firearm-storage rules and purchaser notices

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Act 22

Rep. David A. Tarnas · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Della Au Belatti · Sponsored / Rep. Luke A. Evslin · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Kitagawa · Sponsored / Rep. Nicole E. Lowen · Sponsored / Rep. Scot Z. Matayoshi · Sponsored / Rep. Ikaika Olds · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored / Rep. Jackson D. Sayama · Sponsored / Rep. Gregg Takayama · Sponsored / Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored

Reviewed final Hawaii law

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review.

Act 22, approved 2025-04-22. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Secure firearm storage concerns the injury-prevention component of public health. It does not expand health-insurance coverage, measure mortality or demonstrate fewer injuries. Act 22 requires retail firearm sellers and transferers to provide a copy of the storage law. Storage can use a locked container or a tamper-resistant device, a location a reasonable person would consider secure, or carrying the firearm on or readily retrievable close to the person. Violations carry a fine up to $500; criminally negligent storage involving actual access by a minor under 18 is a misdemeanor under the additional knowledge and permission conditions. Strict civil liability covers injury or property damage within two years when the firearm was obtained because of a violation, subject to lawful self-defense, defense of another and unlawful-entry exceptions. Vehicles are excluded from the premises definition and section 134-11(a) exempt categories remain. Unlawful entry is also an exception to the minor-access offense. Notice violations are treated as unfair or deceptive practices. The act preserves previously matured rights, duties, penalties and proceedings and includes severability. Effective upon approval April 22, 2025. Later amendments, court orders, enforcement and actual injury or crime effects require separate review. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Firearm deaths · crime · reviewed Hawaii policy context · health · reviewed Hawaii policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The purpose of this Act is to protect public safety by providing for the safe and secure storage of firearms.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Greggor Ilagan

Hawaii House of Representatives, District 4 · D–HI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Greggor Ilagan
Hawaii Legislature · HB 1875

RELATING TO HEALTH CARE.

May 29, 2026 · Enacted · Act 59

Rep. Adrian K. Tam · Sponsored / Rep. Terez Amato · Sponsored / Rep. Tina Nakada Grandinetti · Sponsored / Rep. Linda Ichiyama · Sponsored / Rep. Greggor Ilagan · Sponsored / Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto · Sponsored / Rep. Lisa Marten · Sponsored / Rep. Amy A. Perruso · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1875 creates civil remedies for litigation targeting reproductive or gender-affirming care lawful in Hawaii, including injunctions, damages and litigation costs. Actions must be filed within six years after the abusive litigation begins or enforcement of its order or judgment is attempted. Standard payer actions concerning coverage, fraud, waste and lawful contract enforcement remain permitted. Malpractice insurers cannot refuse, cancel or decline renewal solely for providing, assisting or referring qualifying care consistent with accepted practice standards and Hawaii law; the listed sanctions and rate increases are prohibited when unsupported by the specified actuarial analysis. Health plans and insurers cannot terminate or refuse to renew participating-provider contracts solely because the provider provides or assists in the covered care. The abortion connection concerns reproductive-care protections, not every service covered by the law or proof of increased access.

Act 59, approved 2026-05-29. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts reported abortions occurring in Hawaii, regardless of patient residence. Provider permissions and protections concern access to that care; they do not measure residents receiving care elsewhere. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Hawaii evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Chapter 323J, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by adding three new sections to be appropriately designated and to read as follows: "§323J- Abusive litigation; prohibited; remedies. (a) If a person or entity, whether or not acting under the color of law, engages in or attempts to engage in abusive litigation, or attempts to enforce any order or judgment issued in connection with any abusive litigation, any aggrieved person may bring a civil action against that person or entity in the circuit court of the circuit in which the aggrieved person resides or in which the aggrieved person accessed, received, provided, facilitated, or attempted to access, receive provide, or facilitate reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services. The civil actions may be for: (1) Injunctive relief; (2) Actual damages, including the amount of any judgment issued in connection with the abusive litigation; (3) Expenses, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the abusive litigation; (4) Expenses, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred to bring an action under this section; and (5) Punitive damages. (b) Any civil action filed pursuant to this section shall be filed within six years after the date the abusive litigation is commenced, or if the person or entity is attempting to enforce an order or a judgment, within six years after the date enforcement is attempted. (c) Notwithstanding any provision of this section, the requirements set forth herein shall not apply to prohibit standard health care actions or activities of a health payor regarding insurance coverage status, fraud, waste, or lawful activities of a health payor to enforce its rights under a contract with a person or entity. (d) For the purposes of this section: "Abusive litigation" means any litigation or other legal action, including civil, criminal, or administrative action, brought against another person or entity for accessing, receiving, providing, facilitating, or attempting to access, receive, provide, or facilitate reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services that are lawful under the laws of this State. "Aggrieved person" means: (1) A person or entity against whom abusive litigation is filed or prosecuted or against whom an order or judgment issued in connection with such abusive litigation is attempted to be enforced; or (2) The employer or principal of a person against whom abusive litigation is filed or prosecuted or against whom an order or a judgment issued in connection with such abusive litigation is attempted to be enforced if the action that forms the basis of the abusive litigation was performed within the scope of the person's employment or agency relationship. §323J- Medical malpractice insurance; prohibited actions. (a) Any insurer that issues medical malpractice insurance in this State shall not take a prohibited action against an applicant for, or the named insured under, a medical malpractice policy in this State solely because the applicant or insured has provided, or assisted in the provision of, reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services or made a referral for reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services; provided that the care provided by the applicant or insured was consistent with generally accepted standards of practice under the laws of this State and did not otherwise violate the laws of this State. (b) For the purposes of this section, "prohibited action" means: (1) Refusing to issue a medical malpractice policy; (2) Canceling or terminating a medical malpractice policy; (3) Refusing to renew a medical malpractice policy; or (4) Imposing any sanctions, fines, penalties, or rate increases that are not supported by actuarial analysis conducted in accordance with the applicable Actuarial Standards of Practice promulgated by the Actuarial Standards Board. §323J- Health carriers; prohibitions. No group health plan or health insurance insurer offering or renewing a health plan in this State shall terminate or refuse to renew a health care contract with a participating health care provider on the sole basis that the participating provider provides, or assists in the provision of, reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services."
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Hawaii officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Hawaii statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.