Florida’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.
Real GDP$1.38T2025 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth2.8%2025 · #11 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$1.81T2025 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Florida over time
Explore Florida readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Florida officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Florida effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Florida change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Real GDP Florida · source units
FloridaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
2 of 2 reviewed Florida actions match · 2 date markers shown. 32 major events shown separately.
Florida · 2025: $1.38T · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T
Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Florida milestones include its constitutional wage schedule, fuel-tax holiday, housing and education laws, health and energy legislation, theft-law changes, budget approval and pandemic directives, where relevant to this topic. Statutory amounts and national estimates are not observed changes in Florida readings.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Florida · state comparison
Florida output and growth
Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.
Florida · 2025$1.38T
Florida rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real GDP
Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.
Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Florida
2025 · Florida: $1.38T · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Florida Real GDP history
Period
Florida
Compare
2014
$905.65B
2015
$945.93B
2016
$978.99B
2017
$1.01T
2018
$1.05T
2019
$1.08T
2020
$1.07T
2021
$1.17T
2022
$1.25T
2023
$1.3T
2024
$1.34T
2025
$1.38T
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · $1.38T2025 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
$3.43T
—
#2
Texas
$2.33T
—
#3
New York
$1.89T
—
#4
Florida · your comparison
$1.38T
—
#5
Illinois
$948.03B
—
#6
Pennsylvania
$815.87B
—
#7
Ohio
$738.49B
—
#8
Georgia
$719.74B
—
#9
Washington
$715.88B
—
#10
New Jersey
$688.76B
—
#11
North Carolina
$682.83B
—
#12
Massachusetts
$640.79B
—
#13
Virginia
$631.98B
—
#14
Michigan
$575.4B
—
#15
Colorado
$452.78B
—
#16
Arizona
$451.49B
—
#17
Tennessee
$447.66B
—
#18
Maryland
$437.37B
—
#19
Indiana
$422.47B
—
#20
Minnesota
$392.31B
—
#21
Wisconsin
$363.84B
—
#22
Missouri
$362.46B
—
#23
Connecticut
$297.35B
—
#24
South Carolina
$287.16B
—
#25
Oregon
$264.75B
—
#26
Louisiana
$263.89B
—
#27
Alabama
$259.46B
—
#28
Utah
$243.04B
—
#29
Kentucky
$239.51B
—
#30
Oklahoma
$216.31B
—
#31
Nevada
$210.1B
—
#32
Iowa
$204.86B
—
#33
Kansas
$178.51B
—
#34
Nebraska
$156.61B
—
#35
Arkansas
$147.93B
—
#36
Mississippi
$123.37B
—
#37
New Mexico
$122.58B
—
#38
Idaho
$103.62B
—
#39
New Hampshire
$99.06B
—
#40
Hawaii
$93.38B
—
#41
Delaware
$89.92B
—
#42
West Virginia
$84.94B
—
#43
Maine
$77.23B
—
#44
Rhode Island
$67.25B
—
#45
North Dakota
$65.27B
—
#46
Montana
$61.08B
—
#47
South Dakota
$59.87B
—
#48
Alaska
$56.34B
—
#49
Wyoming
$40.16B
—
#50
Vermont
$38.06B
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Choose an industry to compare Florida’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.
Florida · 2025$8.33B
Florida rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output
Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.
A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Florida
2025 · Florida: $8.33B · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Florida Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
Period
Florida
Compare
2014
$6.45B
2015
$6.92B
2016
$6.22B
2017
$6.57B
2018
$6.39B
2019
$6.31B
2020
$6.11B
2021
$7.23B
2022
$7.88B
2023
$9B
2024
$7.56B
2025
$8.33B
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · $8.33B2025 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
$50.67B
—
#2
Texas
$16.95B
—
#3
Iowa
$14.1B
—
#4
Nebraska
$10.6B
—
#5
Illinois
$9.52B
—
#6
Florida · your comparison
$8.33B
—
#7
Washington
$8.05B
—
#8
Minnesota
$8.01B
—
#9
Indiana
$7.13B
—
#10
South Dakota
$7.08B
—
#11
Kansas
$7.02B
—
#12
Ohio
$7B
—
#13
Wisconsin
$6.58B
—
#14
Oregon
$6.18B
—
#15
Michigan
$6.02B
—
#16
Missouri
$5.71B
—
#17
North Carolina
$5.55B
—
#18
Idaho
$5.41B
—
#19
Pennsylvania
$4.97B
—
#20
North Dakota
$4.71B
—
#21
Georgia
$4.53B
—
#22
Oklahoma
$4.26B
—
#23
Arkansas
$4.13B
—
#24
Kentucky
$3.75B
—
#25
New York
$3.55B
—
#26
Alabama
$3.29B
—
#27
Mississippi
$2.99B
—
#28
Colorado
$2.98B
—
#29
Arizona
$2.85B
—
#30
Montana
$2.49B
—
#31
Louisiana
$2.42B
—
#32
Virginia
$2.37B
—
#33
Tennessee
$2.01B
—
#34
New Mexico
$1.7B
—
#35
South Carolina
$1.63B
—
#36
Utah
$1.59B
—
#37
Maryland
$1.31B
—
#38
New Jersey
$1.27B
—
#39
Maine
$1.2B
—
#40
Wyoming
$888.5M
—
#41
Massachusetts
$869.6M
—
#42
Delaware
$741.1M
—
#43
West Virginia
$561.8M
—
#44
Hawaii
$553.9M
—
#45
Nevada
$551.2M
—
#46
Vermont
$536.1M
—
#47
Alaska
$488.1M
—
#48
Connecticut
$341.8M
—
#49
New Hampshire
$320.1M
—
#50
Rhode Island
$164.2M
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.
Florida · 202515,174,955
Florida rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total employment · jobs
BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.
Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Florida
2025 · Florida: 15,174,955 · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Florida Total employment · jobs history
Period
Florida
Compare
2014
10,937,826
2015
11,367,938
2016
11,683,361
2017
12,099,806
2018
12,558,124
2019
12,763,542
2020
12,722,904
2021
13,462,371
2022
14,226,070
2023
14,780,540
2024
15,350,135
2025
15,174,955
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · 15,174,9552025 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
25,407,891
—
#2
Texas
20,639,097
—
#3
Florida · your comparison
15,174,955
—
#4
New York
13,498,360
—
#5
Illinois
8,197,037
—
#6
Pennsylvania
8,150,272
—
#7
Ohio
7,394,537
—
#8
Georgia
7,184,433
—
#9
North Carolina
6,864,520
—
#10
New Jersey
6,095,348
—
#11
Michigan
5,946,187
—
#12
Virginia
5,789,397
—
#13
Massachusetts
5,020,627
—
#14
Washington
4,879,224
—
#15
Tennessee
4,633,711
—
#16
Arizona
4,455,141
—
#17
Colorado
4,231,488
—
#18
Indiana
4,213,622
—
#19
Maryland
4,009,451
—
#20
Missouri
3,998,549
—
#21
Minnesota
3,914,167
—
#22
Wisconsin
3,855,203
—
#23
South Carolina
3,245,739
—
#24
Alabama
2,966,686
—
#25
Louisiana
2,831,737
—
#26
Kentucky
2,718,290
—
#27
Oregon
2,671,758
—
#28
Oklahoma
2,466,719
—
#29
Utah
2,458,247
—
#30
Connecticut
2,424,541
—
#31
Nevada
2,163,825
—
#32
Iowa
2,122,389
—
#33
Kansas
2,007,083
—
#34
Arkansas
1,811,561
—
#35
Mississippi
1,713,294
—
#36
Nebraska
1,410,465
—
#37
Idaho
1,238,642
—
#38
New Mexico
1,183,906
—
#39
New Hampshire
942,254
—
#40
Hawaii
925,451
—
#41
West Virginia
910,570
—
#42
Maine
898,379
—
#43
Montana
761,061
—
#44
Rhode Island
690,505
—
#45
Delaware
678,218
—
#46
South Dakota
665,420
—
#47
North Dakota
605,276
—
#48
Alaska
472,008
—
#49
Wyoming
451,906
—
#50
Vermont
439,349
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
2 of 2 reviewed Florida actions · newest first
May 15, 2023 · Governor Ron DeSantis Awards More Than $3.9 Million for Infrastructure in Pensacola Through the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund · Governor Ron DeSantis Awards More Than $3.9 Million for Infrastructure in Pensacola Through the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund · Funding awardedGovernor · Governor Ron DeSantis Awards More Than $3.9 Million for Infrastructure in Pensacola Through the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund
Governor Ron DeSantis Awards More Than $3.9 Million for Infrastructure in Pensacola Through the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund
May 15, 2023 · Funding awarded
Gov. Ron DeSantis · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Today, Governor Ron DeSantis awarded more than $3.9 million to the City of Pensacola through the Governor’s Florida Job Growth Grant Fund to facilitate infrastructure improvements at the Port of Pensacola. This award will spur economic growth by
The Governor announced the funding action on May 15, 2023.
Why this record is included
The immediate source directly funds workforce training or job-supporting infrastructure, changes reemployment policy, or determines an employment-related measure. It is employment context and does not establish an effect on Florida's unemployment rate.
Retained Florida evidence context: CPS U-3 unemployment estimate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Today, Governor Ron DeSantis awarded more than $3.9 million to the City of Pensacola through the Governor’s Florida Job Growth Grant Fund to facilitate infrastructure improvements at the Port of Pensacola. This award will spur economic growth by
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 1, 2019 · Governor Ron DeSantis Announces $40 million Available through Florida Job Growth Grant Fund · Governor Ron DeSantis Announces $40 million Available through Florida Job Growth Grant Fund · Action announcedGovernor · Governor Ron DeSantis Announces $40 million Available through Florida Job Growth Grant Fund
Governor Ron DeSantis Announces $40 million Available through Florida Job Growth Grant Fund
Jul 1, 2019 · Action announced
Gov. Ron DeSantis · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
DEO and EFI Now Accepting Economic Development Project Proposals Tallahassee, Fla. — Today, Governor Ron DeSantis announced the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) and Enterprise Florida, Inc. (EFI) are accepting economic development project proposals for the Florida
The Governor announced the action on July 1, 2019.
Why this record is included
The immediate source directly funds workforce training or job-supporting infrastructure, changes reemployment policy, or determines an employment-related measure. It is employment context and does not establish an effect on Florida's unemployment rate.
Retained Florida evidence context: CPS U-3 unemployment estimate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
DEO and EFI Now Accepting Economic Development Project Proposals Tallahassee, Fla. — Today, Governor Ron DeSantis announced the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) and Enterprise Florida, Inc. (EFI) are accepting economic development project proposals for the Florida
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Florida officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 2, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Florida candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
Florida's natural resources are one of our greatest assets and should be protected for future generations. My philosophy is conservation first, responsible stewardship second, and strategic acquisition only when there is a clear public benefit. We must protect our aquifer, springs, wetlands, state p…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Florida Cabinet, acting as the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, manages over 12 million acres of public lands. What is your philosophy on conservation, acquisition, and protection of natural resources, including Florida Forever projects, state parks, and coastal areas? El Gabinete de Florida, actuando como Junta de Fideicomisarios del Internal Improvement Trust Fund, administra más de 12 millones de acres de tierras públicas. ¿Cuál es su filosofía sobre la conservación, adquisición y protección de los recursos naturales, incluyendo proyectos de Florida Forever, parques estatales y zonas costeras?
Candidate questionnaire response
Florida's natural resources are one of our greatest assets and should be protected for future generations. My philosophy is conservation first, responsible stewardship second, and strategic acquisition only when there is a clear public benefit. We must protect our aquifer, springs, wetlands, state parks, and coastal areas while ensuring taxpayer dollars are spent wisely. I support Florida Forever projects that preserve environmentally sensitive lands, protect water resources, and strengthen flood resilience. Florida cannot continue to grow without limits while ignoring the strain on our infrastructure and natural resources. Every project should be evaluated for its long-term environmental and financial impact. Conservation is not an obstacle to economic growth. It is an investment in Florida's future and the quality of life that attracts families, businesses, and visitors to our state.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We need to update disaster infrastructure and systems in advance of any future catastrophic weather event. We should also require transparency and clear construction and operations requirements for developers on all AI data centers, and make Florida a place where AI development is decentralized and …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: What actions can be taken to protect Florida's environment, water quality and coastlines from pollution, overdevelopment and climate change? ¿Qué acciones pueden tomarse para proteger el medio ambiente de Florida, la calidad del agua y las costas frente a la contaminación, el desarrollo excesivo y el cambio climático?
Candidate questionnaire response
We need to update disaster infrastructure and systems in advance of any future catastrophic weather event. We should also require transparency and clear construction and operations requirements for developers on all AI data centers, and make Florida a place where AI development is decentralized and innovative, not centralized and controlled by unaccountable Surveillance State parties for purposes against Floridians' liberties. There are natural solutions to water conservation through purification and reuse as well as large-scale waste breakdown to convert trash to rich soil for agricultural use, which I currently promote with my partners through our soon-to-launch environmental technologies company. These solutions join economic development with environmental protection for Florida.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Florida candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Florida incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Florida legislators and Florida’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Florida’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 Florida incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us
Only current Florida officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Florida statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 2, 2026.
Sources & methods
Each data section links to its primary source and states its reporting period, unit, definition, and comparison limits. All 50 states appear in comparison tables. D.C. and territories are excluded from ranks. Missing and suppressed observations stay unavailable; a missing value is never treated as zero.
Ranks use stored source precision, ordered highest to lowest. Equal values share the same rank (1, 2, 2, 4). Sampling error and reporting coverage can make nearby ranks unreliable. The U.S. benchmark uses the published national measure when it is available, rather than a simple average of state values.
Supplemental government datasets retrieved October 4, 2026. Existing reviewed datasets retain their original verification dates. Refreshing the page does not refresh an official data release.
