Delaware · individual fact

Delaware crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Delaware public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate368.4 per 100k2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,773.8 per 100k2024 · #19 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage100%2024 · #1 of 50 · highest first

Delaware over time

Explore Delaware readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Delaware officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Delaware effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Delaware change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate Delaware · source units
DelawarePublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 368.4 per 100k351.4 per 100k439.4 per 100k527.4 per 100kDelaware, 2015: 503.2 per 100kDelaware, 2016: 510.4 per 100kDelaware, 2017: 455 per 100kDelaware, 2018: 423.4 per 100kDelaware, 2019: 423 per 100kDelaware, 2020: 442.4 per 100kDelaware, 2021: 424.9 per 100kDelaware, 2022: 394.2 per 100kDelaware, 2023: 398.8 per 100kDelaware, 2024: 368.4 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 40National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActDelaware · Delaware approves catalytic-converter transaction safeguards · 2023-09-11Catalytic-converter safeguardsNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyDelaware · Delaware creates its gun-violence prevention office · 2025-05-01Gun-violence prevention officeDelaware · Delaware approves civil remedies against voter intimidation · 2026-08-06Voter-intimidation civil remediesNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data releaseDelaware · Delaware approves the Rick Urey Behavioral Health Treatment Act · 2026-08-31Behavioral-health licensing lawDelaware · Delaware codifies its gun violence prevention and community safety office · 2026-09-03Gun prevention office codifiedDelaware · Delaware orders phased harm-reduction licensing and evaluation · 2026-09-30Harm-reduction implementation orderDelaware · Delaware approves harm-reduction licensing and personal-use paraphernalia changes · 2026-09-30Harm-reduction law● Delaware Legislature · 5● U.S. Congress · Delaware delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 62■ Delaware agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-01-012026-09-30

11 of 11 reviewed Delaware actions match · 10 date markers shown. 40 major events shown separately.

Delaware · 2024: 368.4 per 100k · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Delaware's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.9% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Delaware Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodDelawareRankU.S. benchmark
2024368.4 per 100k#21 of 50Not available
2023398.8 per 100k#21 of 50Not available
2022394.2 per 100k#22 of 50Not available
2021424.9 per 100k#15 of 50Not available
2020442.4 per 100k#18 of 50Not available
2019423 per 100k#17 of 50Not available
2018423.4 per 100k#17 of 50Not available
2017455 per 100k#14 of 50Not available
2016510.4 per 100k#9 of 50Not available
2015503.2 per 100k#7 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Delaware · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

Delaware · 2024368.4 per 100k
Delaware rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Delaware's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.9% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Delaware
Reported violent-crime rate history in Delaware347.1 per 100k439.4 per 100k531.7 per 100k20152024
2024 · Delaware: 368.4 per 100k · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Delaware Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodDelawareCompare
2015503.2 per 100k
2016510.4 per 100k
2017455 per 100k
2018423.4 per 100k
2019423 per 100k
2020442.4 per 100k
2021424.9 per 100k
2022394.2 per 100k
2023398.8 per 100k
2024368.4 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Delaware stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Delaware has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Delaware · 368.4 per 100k2024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Delaware with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware · your comparison368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

368.4 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Delaware's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.9% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

1,773.8 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Delaware's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.9% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 100%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Delaware · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

Delaware · 2024123
Delaware rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Delaware stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Delaware has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Delaware · 1232024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Delaware with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware · your comparison123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

1232024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
11.8 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data.

  • The total combines firearm deaths across intents, including suicide, homicide, legal intervention, and unintentional or undetermined injury.
  • It does not measure nonfatal injuries, firearm ownership, defensive uses, or policy effects.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Delaware candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

15 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Delaware Attorney General — Democratic Primary

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Patty Rickman

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · DE

Policing & criminal justice context

Strengthening the bond between law enforcement and citizens while prioritizing effective crime prevention for all neighborhoods.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Strengthening the bond between law enforcement and citizens while prioritizing effective crime prevention for all neighborhoods.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Patty Rickman — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Delaware U.S. House — General Election (current qualified candidates)

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Sarah McBride

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House · DE

Policing & criminal justice context

I’ll bring this experience to Congress and help make our criminal justice system work for everyone. I’ll vote to end mass incarceration, legalize marijuana and expunge convictions, and help to reimagine a system that prioritizes reentry and prevents recidivism.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

I’ll bring this experience to Congress and help make our criminal justice system work for everyone. I’ll vote to end mass incarceration, legalize marijuana and expunge convictions, and help to reimagine a system that prioritizes reentry and prevents recidivism.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sarah McBride — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗

2026 Delaware U.S. Senate — Democratic Primary

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Chris Coons

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. Senate · DE

Crime & victimization

While in county government, Chris worked closely with the second largest police department in Delaware and understands the sacrifice officers make every day. As co-chair of the Senate Law Enforcement Caucus, he has worked to increase resources for local law enforcement, enforcing stricter gun violen…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Gun policy

Candidate campaign source

While in county government, Chris worked closely with the second largest police department in Delaware and understands the sacrifice officers make every day. As co-chair of the Senate Law Enforcement Caucus, he has worked to increase resources for local law enforcement, enforcing stricter gun violence prevention measures, and ensuring justice and rehabilitation systems serve communities effectively.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Chris Coons — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Chris Coons
Policing & criminal justice context

Chris believes we need to focus on restoring fairness and justice to the American immigration system. That means enforcing the laws on the books and ensuring that the system isn’t run by unqualified, unaccountable federal immigration agents. He has worked throughout his career to find a path to comp…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy

Candidate campaign source

Chris believes we need to focus on restoring fairness and justice to the American immigration system. That means enforcing the laws on the books and ensuring that the system isn’t run by unqualified, unaccountable federal immigration agents. He has worked throughout his career to find a path to comprehensive immigration reform and has worked to hold immigration officials to the same standards as local law enforcement. He has introduced legislation to create an oversight body to monitor abuses by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and prevent those officers from entering vulnerable locations, such as schools and hospitals.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Chris Coons — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Mary Louve

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. Senate · DE

Crime & victimization

Increasing federal grants for specialized judicial training on domestic violence, coercive control, trauma-informed practices, and child safety.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Increasing federal grants for specialized judicial training on domestic violence, coercive control, trauma-informed practices, and child safety.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mary Louve — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Delaware candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Delaware incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Delaware legislators and Delaware’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Delaware’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

15 matching sponsorships or proposals · 12 Delaware incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Eric Morrison

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Eric Morrison
Delaware Legislature · HB 78

Delaware approves catalytic-converter transaction safeguards

Sep 11, 2023 · Enacted · Chapter 84:207

Rep. Eric Morrison · Sponsored / Sen. Stephanie L. Hansen · Sponsored / Rep. Stephanie T. Bolden · Co-sponsored / Rep. William Bush · Co-sponsored / Rep. Franklin D. Cooke · Co-sponsored / Rep. Debra Heffernan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kendra Johnson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Edward S. Osienski · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kimberly Williams · Co-sponsored / Rep. Madinah Wilson-Anton · Co-sponsored / Sen. Russell Huxtable · Co-sponsored / Sen. Spiros Mantzavinos · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Laura V. Sturgeon · Co-sponsored / Sen. Bryan Townsend · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Final amended HB 78, enacted as Volume 84, Chapter 207, regulates transactions involving used detached catalytic converters. It limits authorized sellers and purchasers, requires identification, ownership and vehicle records and photographs, restricts cash purchases and sets transaction hours and locations. Authorized purchasers must withhold payment and retain the intact converter for 48 hours, excluding holidays and weekends. The definition excludes converters certified and labeled for EPA-compliant reuse. The converter rule is a payment-withholding and intact-retention period; the separate 72-hour rule applies to specified copper or brass articles. Approval does not prove inspections, enforcement, recovery of stolen parts or lower property-crime rates.

Chapter 84:207 signed 2023-09-11. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Final amended HB 78, enacted as Volume 84, Chapter 207, regulates transactions involving used detached catalytic converters. It limits authorized sellers and purchasers, requires identification, ownership and vehicle records and photographs, restricts cash purchases and sets transaction hours and locations. Authorized purchasers must withhold payment and retain the intact converter for 48 hours, excluding holidays and weekends. The definition excludes converters certified and labeled for EPA-compliant reuse. The converter rule is a payment-withholding and intact-retention period; the separate 72-hour rule applies to specified copper or brass articles. Approval does not prove inspections, enforcement, recovery of stolen parts or lower property-crime rates.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Reported property-crime rate · crime · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

must withhold payment to the seller of a catalytic converter for 48 hours, not including holidays or weekends.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Krista Griffith

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Krista Griffith
Delaware Legislature · HB 444

Delaware approves civil remedies against voter intimidation

Aug 6, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 85:421

Rep. Larry Lambert · Sponsored / Rep. Krista Griffith · Sponsored / Rep. Stephanie T. Bolden · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown · Sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Sponsored / Sen. Marie Pinkney · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel Cruce · Sponsored / Rep. Alonna Berry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mara Gorman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. Melanie Ross Levin · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Josue O Ortega · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kamela T Smith · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Burns · Co-sponsored / Rep. Sophie Phillips · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Rep. William Bush · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kimberly Williams · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kerri Evelyn Harris · Co-sponsored / Rep. Franklin D. Cooke · Co-sponsored / Sen. S. Elizabeth Lockman · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Russell Huxtable · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ray Seigfried · Co-sponsored / Sen. Bryant L. Richardson · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Final amended HB 444, the Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act, adds a civil route to challenge voter intimidation, deception and obstruction. Its anti-intimidation provisions cover force, violence, restraint, abduction, duress and threats that interfere with voting. Eligible individuals, organizations and the Attorney General may seek tailored civil remedies, attorney fees and specified damages. The act takes effect July 1, 2027, after signing. This crime-topic relationship covers civil remedies for intimidation and obstruction; it does not create new criminal penalties or establish lower violent-crime rates. Voting discrimination, districting and language-access provisions are reviewed separately and are not treated as health, housing, education, budget or CPI programs.

Chapter 85:421 signed 2026-08-06. Effective July 1, 2027. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Final amended HB 444, the Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act, adds a civil route to challenge voter intimidation, deception and obstruction. Its anti-intimidation provisions cover force, violence, restraint, abduction, duress and threats that interfere with voting. Eligible individuals, organizations and the Attorney General may seek tailored civil remedies, attorney fees and specified damages. The act takes effect July 1, 2027, after signing. This crime-topic relationship covers civil remedies for intimidation and obstruction; it does not create new criminal penalties or establish lower violent-crime rates. Voting discrimination, districting and language-access provisions are reviewed separately and are not treated as health, housing, education, budget or CPI programs.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Registered-voter turnout · crime · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The use or threat to use any force, violence, restraint, abduction, or duress
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Larry Lambert

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Larry Lambert
Delaware Legislature · HB 444

Delaware approves civil remedies against voter intimidation

Aug 6, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 85:421

Rep. Larry Lambert · Sponsored / Rep. Krista Griffith · Sponsored / Rep. Stephanie T. Bolden · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown · Sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Sponsored / Sen. Marie Pinkney · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel Cruce · Sponsored / Rep. Alonna Berry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mara Gorman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. Melanie Ross Levin · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Josue O Ortega · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kamela T Smith · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Burns · Co-sponsored / Rep. Sophie Phillips · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Rep. William Bush · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kimberly Williams · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kerri Evelyn Harris · Co-sponsored / Rep. Franklin D. Cooke · Co-sponsored / Sen. S. Elizabeth Lockman · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Russell Huxtable · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ray Seigfried · Co-sponsored / Sen. Bryant L. Richardson · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Final amended HB 444, the Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act, adds a civil route to challenge voter intimidation, deception and obstruction. Its anti-intimidation provisions cover force, violence, restraint, abduction, duress and threats that interfere with voting. Eligible individuals, organizations and the Attorney General may seek tailored civil remedies, attorney fees and specified damages. The act takes effect July 1, 2027, after signing. This crime-topic relationship covers civil remedies for intimidation and obstruction; it does not create new criminal penalties or establish lower violent-crime rates. Voting discrimination, districting and language-access provisions are reviewed separately and are not treated as health, housing, education, budget or CPI programs.

Chapter 85:421 signed 2026-08-06. Effective July 1, 2027. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Final amended HB 444, the Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act, adds a civil route to challenge voter intimidation, deception and obstruction. Its anti-intimidation provisions cover force, violence, restraint, abduction, duress and threats that interfere with voting. Eligible individuals, organizations and the Attorney General may seek tailored civil remedies, attorney fees and specified damages. The act takes effect July 1, 2027, after signing. This crime-topic relationship covers civil remedies for intimidation and obstruction; it does not create new criminal penalties or establish lower violent-crime rates. Voting discrimination, districting and language-access provisions are reviewed separately and are not treated as health, housing, education, budget or CPI programs.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Registered-voter turnout · crime · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The use or threat to use any force, violence, restraint, abduction, or duress
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Mara Gorman

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Mara Gorman
Delaware Legislature · HB 369

Delaware codifies its gun violence prevention and community safety office

Sep 3, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 85:468

Rep. Mara Gorman · Sponsored / Sen. S. Elizabeth Lockman · Sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Co-sponsored / Rep. Josue O Ortega · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kerri Evelyn Harris · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Stephanie L. Hansen · Co-sponsored / Sen. Marie Pinkney · Co-sponsored / Sen. Nicole Poore · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 369, enacted as Volume 85, Chapter 468, codifies an Office of Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety within Safety and Homeland Security. It directs intergovernmental coordination, advice on prevention and intervention, recurring-issue reporting and cooperation from relevant state agencies. The office was previously established by EO 9 on May 1, 2025. This statutory milestone does not show a second independent prevention program, a new appropriation, completed interventions or a measured reduction in gun injuries, deaths or crime.

Chapter 85:468 signed 2026-09-03. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

HB 369, enacted as Volume 85, Chapter 468, codifies an Office of Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety within Safety and Homeland Security. It directs intergovernmental coordination, advice on prevention and intervention, recurring-issue reporting and cooperation from relevant state agencies. The office was previously established by EO 9 on May 1, 2025. This statutory milestone does not show a second independent prevention program, a new appropriation, completed interventions or a measured reduction in gun injuries, deaths or crime.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Firearm deaths · Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate · health · reviewed Delaware policy context · crime · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

There is hereby established, within the Department of Safety and Homeland Security, an Office of Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown
Delaware Legislature · HB 444

Delaware approves civil remedies against voter intimidation

Aug 6, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 85:421

Rep. Larry Lambert · Sponsored / Rep. Krista Griffith · Sponsored / Rep. Stephanie T. Bolden · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown · Sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Sponsored / Sen. Marie Pinkney · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel Cruce · Sponsored / Rep. Alonna Berry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mara Gorman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. Melanie Ross Levin · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Josue O Ortega · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kamela T Smith · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Burns · Co-sponsored / Rep. Sophie Phillips · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Rep. William Bush · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kimberly Williams · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kerri Evelyn Harris · Co-sponsored / Rep. Franklin D. Cooke · Co-sponsored / Sen. S. Elizabeth Lockman · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Russell Huxtable · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ray Seigfried · Co-sponsored / Sen. Bryant L. Richardson · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Final amended HB 444, the Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act, adds a civil route to challenge voter intimidation, deception and obstruction. Its anti-intimidation provisions cover force, violence, restraint, abduction, duress and threats that interfere with voting. Eligible individuals, organizations and the Attorney General may seek tailored civil remedies, attorney fees and specified damages. The act takes effect July 1, 2027, after signing. This crime-topic relationship covers civil remedies for intimidation and obstruction; it does not create new criminal penalties or establish lower violent-crime rates. Voting discrimination, districting and language-access provisions are reviewed separately and are not treated as health, housing, education, budget or CPI programs.

Chapter 85:421 signed 2026-08-06. Effective July 1, 2027. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Final amended HB 444, the Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act, adds a civil route to challenge voter intimidation, deception and obstruction. Its anti-intimidation provisions cover force, violence, restraint, abduction, duress and threats that interfere with voting. Eligible individuals, organizations and the Attorney General may seek tailored civil remedies, attorney fees and specified damages. The act takes effect July 1, 2027, after signing. This crime-topic relationship covers civil remedies for intimidation and obstruction; it does not create new criminal penalties or establish lower violent-crime rates. Voting discrimination, districting and language-access provisions are reviewed separately and are not treated as health, housing, education, budget or CPI programs.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Registered-voter turnout · crime · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The use or threat to use any force, violence, restraint, abduction, or duress
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha
Delaware Legislature · SB 249

Delaware approves harm-reduction licensing and personal-use paraphernalia changes

Sep 30, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 85:536

Sen. Marie Pinkney · Sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Sponsored / Sen. Ray Seigfried · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Laura V. Sturgeon · Co-sponsored / Rep. Alonna Berry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Stephanie T. Bolden · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kendra Johnson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Larry Lambert · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kamela T Smith · Co-sponsored

Reviewed final state legislation

Final amended SB 249, enacted as Volume 85, Chapter 536, establishes evidence-based licensing for harm-reduction providers, required supplies and services, participant anonymity, limited program data collection, referrals and conditional good-faith immunity. It revises drug-paraphernalia definitions and exempts specified personal-use, storage, testing and consumption supplies while retaining manufacturing, distribution and specified sales prohibitions. Signing and the bill page’s September 30 effective date are distinct from licensing regulations, provider licenses and service delivery. Immunity requires good faith and reasonable care and has express misconduct exceptions. Referrals do not guarantee housing, benefits or treatment, and the act does not decriminalize all drug possession or establish lower overdose deaths or crime rates.

Signed 2026-09-30. The final text establishes the licensing authority; actual regulations, licenses, program operations and outcomes require separate verification.

Why this record is included

Final amended SB 249, enacted as Volume 85, Chapter 536, establishes evidence-based licensing for harm-reduction providers, required supplies and services, participant anonymity, limited program data collection, referrals and conditional good-faith immunity. It revises drug-paraphernalia definitions and exempts specified personal-use, storage, testing and consumption supplies while retaining manufacturing, distribution and specified sales prohibitions. Signing and the bill page’s September 30 effective date are distinct from licensing regulations, provider licenses and service delivery. Immunity requires good faith and reasonable care and has express misconduct exceptions. Referrals do not guarantee housing, benefits or treatment, and the act does not decriminalize all drug possession or establish lower overdose deaths or crime rates. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Delaware evidence context: health · reviewed Delaware policy context · crime · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

A program must not require a one-for-one exchange of sterile supplies.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Delaware Legislature · SS 1 for SB 161

Delaware approves the Rick Urey Behavioral Health Treatment Act

Aug 31, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 85:461

Sen. Marie Pinkney · Sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Sponsored / Rep. Krista Griffith · Co-sponsored / Rep. Larry Lambert · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored

Reviewed final state legislation

SS 1 for SB 161, enacted as Volume 85, Chapter 461, revises behavioral-health provider licensing, oversight and enforcement. It establishes client rights and provider duties, incident reporting and investigations, protection-and-advocacy access, confidentiality and remedies. It creates specified offenses for unlawful unlicensed treatment and intentional reporting violations, with civil penalties and anti-retaliation protections. Section 11 makes sections 6, 7 and 10–12 effective immediately. Section 12 also makes sections 1–5, 8 and 9 effective immediately but sets implementation for the earlier of two years after enactment or the Director’s published notice of final implementing regulations. Licensing exemptions and lawful limits on client rights apply. Signing does not prove completed regulations, provider compliance, improved health or reduced crime.

Signed 2026-08-31. Immediate legal effectiveness is distinct from the earlier-of-two-years-or-regulations-notice implementation rule for sections 1–5, 8 and 9.

Why this record is included

SS 1 for SB 161, enacted as Volume 85, Chapter 461, revises behavioral-health provider licensing, oversight and enforcement. It establishes client rights and provider duties, incident reporting and investigations, protection-and-advocacy access, confidentiality and remedies. It creates specified offenses for unlawful unlicensed treatment and intentional reporting violations, with civil penalties and anti-retaliation protections. Section 11 makes sections 6, 7 and 10–12 effective immediately. Section 12 also makes sections 1–5, 8 and 9 effective immediately but sets implementation for the earlier of two years after enactment or the Director’s published notice of final implementing regulations. Licensing exemptions and lawful limits on client rights apply. Signing does not prove completed regulations, provider compliance, improved health or reduced crime. The chart does not isolate this action’s effect.

Retained Delaware evidence context: health · reviewed Delaware policy context · crime · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sections 1 through 5, 8, and 9 of this Act are effective immediately and are to be implemented the earlier of the following:
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Delaware officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Delaware statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.