State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.
Annual unemployment rate3.3%2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents1,868,8602024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer2%2025 · 11-month average · #5 of 50 · highest first
Connecticut over time
Explore Connecticut readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Connecticut officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Connecticut effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Connecticut change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Annual unemployment rate Connecticut · source units
ConnecticutPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
5 of 5 reviewed Connecticut actions match · 5 date markers shown. 17 major events shown separately.
Connecticut · 2024: 3.3% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%
Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Connecticut Annual unemployment rate · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Connecticut · state comparison
Employment and unemployment over time
LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.
Connecticut · 20243.3%
Connecticut rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual unemployment rate
Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.
LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Connecticut
2024 · Connecticut: 3.3% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Connecticut Annual unemployment rate history
Period
Connecticut
Compare
2015
5.6%
2016
4.9%
2017
4.4%
2018
3.9%
2019
3.6%
2020
8%
2021
6.4%
2022
4%
2023
3.2%
2024
3.3%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 3.3%2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Nevada
5.4%
—
#2
California
5.3%
—
#3
Illinois
5%
—
#4
Kentucky
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Jersey
4.6%
—
#7
Alaska
4.5%
—
#7
Washington
4.5%
—
#9
Ohio
4.4%
—
#10
Louisiana
4.3%
—
#10
Oregon
4.3%
—
#12
New York
4.2%
—
#12
Rhode Island
4.2%
—
#14
Colorado
4.1%
—
#14
New Mexico
4.1%
—
#14
South Carolina
4.1%
—
#14
Texas
4.1%
—
#14
West Virginia
4.1%
—
#19
Indiana
4%
—
#19
Massachusetts
4%
—
#21
Delaware
3.9%
—
#22
Pennsylvania
3.8%
—
#23
Arizona
3.7%
—
#23
Missouri
3.7%
—
#23
North Carolina
3.7%
—
#26
Idaho
3.6%
—
#27
Arkansas
3.5%
—
#27
Kansas
3.5%
—
#29
Florida
3.4%
—
#29
Georgia
3.4%
—
#29
Tennessee
3.4%
—
#32
Connecticut · your comparison
3.3%
—
#32
Utah
3.3%
—
#34
Iowa
3.2%
—
#34
Maryland
3.2%
—
#34
Mississippi
3.2%
—
#34
Oklahoma
3.2%
—
#38
Minnesota
3.1%
—
#38
Wyoming
3.1%
—
#40
Alabama
3%
—
#40
Maine
3%
—
#40
Montana
3%
—
#40
Wisconsin
3%
—
#44
Virginia
2.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
2.8%
—
#46
Nebraska
2.7%
—
#47
New Hampshire
2.6%
—
#48
North Dakota
2.4%
—
#49
Vermont
2.3%
—
#50
South Dakota
1.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.
Connecticut · 2025 · 11-month average2%
Connecticut rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer
Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.
2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 2%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
2.4%
—
#2
Oregon
2.2%
—
#3
Illinois
2.1%
—
#3
New York
2.1%
—
#5
Connecticut · your comparison
2%
—
#5
Rhode Island
2%
—
#5
Washington
2%
—
#8
Massachusetts
1.9%
—
#8
Nevada
1.9%
—
#8
New Jersey
1.9%
—
#11
Delaware
1.8%
—
#11
Virginia
1.8%
—
#13
Louisiana
1.7%
—
#13
Michigan
1.7%
—
#13
West Virginia
1.7%
—
#16
Alaska
1.6%
—
#16
Florida
1.6%
—
#16
Mississippi
1.6%
—
#16
New Mexico
1.6%
—
#16
Ohio
1.6%
—
#16
Pennsylvania
1.6%
—
#22
Colorado
1.5%
—
#22
Kentucky
1.5%
—
#22
Maryland
1.5%
—
#22
Texas
1.5%
—
#26
Arizona
1.4%
—
#26
Georgia
1.4%
—
#28
Arkansas
1.3%
—
#28
Iowa
1.3%
—
#28
North Carolina
1.3%
—
#28
Oklahoma
1.3%
—
#28
South Carolina
1.3%
—
#33
Kansas
1.2%
—
#33
Minnesota
1.2%
—
#33
New Hampshire
1.2%
—
#33
Wisconsin
1.2%
—
#37
Tennessee
1.1%
—
#37
Utah
1.1%
—
#39
Idaho
1%
—
#39
Indiana
1%
—
#39
Nebraska
1%
—
#42
Alabama
0.9%
—
#42
Maine
0.9%
—
#42
Missouri
0.9%
—
#42
Wyoming
0.9%
—
#46
Hawaii
0.7%
—
#46
Montana
0.7%
—
#46
South Dakota
0.7%
—
#46
Vermont
0.7%
—
#50
North Dakota
0.6%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.
Connecticut · 20252.5%
Connecticut rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual real GDP growth
Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.
Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Connecticut
2025 · Connecticut: 2.5% · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Connecticut Annual real GDP growth history
Period
Connecticut
Compare
2015
3.2%
2016
-0.3%
2017
2.1%
2018
0.3%
2019
0.3%
2020
-4.6%
2021
3.5%
2022
3.3%
2023
1.3%
2024
2%
2025
2.5%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 2.5%2025 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Delaware
5.1%
—
#2
Alaska
4.7%
—
#3
California
3.5%
—
#4
South Carolina
3.3%
—
#5
Washington
3.2%
—
#6
Idaho
3.1%
—
#7
Kentucky
3%
—
#8
Georgia
2.9%
—
#9
Texas
2.8%
—
#10
West Virginia
2.8%
—
#11
Florida
2.8%
—
#12
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#13
Utah
2.7%
—
#14
Illinois
2.6%
—
#15
New York
2.5%
—
#16
Connecticut · your comparison
2.5%
—
#17
Ohio
2.4%
—
#18
Virginia
2.3%
—
#19
Oklahoma
2.2%
—
#20
Michigan
2.2%
—
#21
Tennessee
2.1%
—
#22
New Jersey
2%
—
#23
Nevada
2%
—
#24
Montana
2%
—
#25
Alabama
2%
—
#26
Vermont
1.9%
—
#27
Colorado
1.9%
—
#28
Indiana
1.9%
—
#29
Pennsylvania
1.8%
—
#30
North Carolina
1.8%
—
#31
New Mexico
1.8%
—
#32
South Dakota
1.8%
—
#33
New Hampshire
1.7%
—
#34
Louisiana
1.5%
—
#35
Hawaii
1.5%
—
#36
Arizona
1.5%
—
#37
Maine
1.4%
—
#38
Oregon
1.4%
—
#39
Massachusetts
1.3%
—
#40
Mississippi
1.3%
—
#41
Nebraska
1.3%
—
#42
Missouri
1.2%
—
#43
Kansas
1%
—
#44
Arkansas
0.9%
—
#45
Wisconsin
0.8%
—
#46
Maryland
0.8%
—
#47
Minnesota
0.7%
—
#48
North Dakota
0.5%
—
#49
Wyoming
0.1%
—
#50
Iowa
-0.4%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.
Connecticut · December 202567,000
Connecticut rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Openings · number
Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.
Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Connecticut
December 2025 · Connecticut: 67,000 · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Connecticut Openings · number history
Period
Connecticut
Compare
July 2025
69,000
August 2025
67,000
September 2025
73,000
October 2025
74,000
November 2025
69,000
December 2025
67,000
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Connecticut · 67,000December 2025 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
674,000
—
#2
Texas
608,000
—
#3
New York
431,000
—
#4
Florida
404,000
—
#5
Ohio
287,000
—
#6
Georgia
279,000
—
#7
Pennsylvania
235,000
—
#8
Michigan
221,000
—
#9
Virginia
213,000
—
#10
North Carolina
212,000
—
#11
Illinois
211,000
—
#12
New Jersey
172,000
—
#13
Tennessee
143,000
—
#14
Minnesota
135,000
—
#15
Massachusetts
129,000
—
#16
Missouri
128,000
—
#17
Maryland
127,000
—
#18
Indiana
123,000
—
#19
Arizona
121,000
—
#20
Wisconsin
115,000
—
#21
Washington
110,000
—
#22
South Carolina
103,000
—
#23
Louisiana
101,000
—
#23
Oklahoma
101,000
—
#25
Colorado
100,000
—
#26
Kentucky
92,000
—
#27
Alabama
91,000
—
#28
Oregon
72,000
—
#29
Connecticut · your comparison
67,000
—
#30
Utah
64,000
—
#31
Kansas
61,000
—
#32
Arkansas
60,000
—
#33
Mississippi
59,000
—
#34
Iowa
57,000
—
#35
Nevada
52,000
—
#36
West Virginia
42,000
—
#37
Nebraska
38,000
—
#38
Idaho
34,000
—
#39
New Mexico
32,000
—
#40
Maine
28,000
—
#41
Delaware
23,000
—
#42
Montana
22,000
—
#42
New Hampshire
22,000
—
#42
Rhode Island
22,000
—
#45
South Dakota
20,000
—
#46
Hawaii
19,000
—
#47
North Dakota
18,000
—
#48
Alaska
16,000
—
#49
Vermont
11,000
—
#49
Wyoming
11,000
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
5 of 5 reviewed Connecticut actions · newest first
Jun 4, 2026 · SB220 · SB 220 — Literacy, educator scholarships, ASL and paraeducator health benefits · Signed by governorGovernor · SB220
SB 220 — Literacy, educator scholarships, ASL and paraeducator health benefits
Jun 4, 2026 · Signed by governor
Ned Lamont · Signed
Reviewed topic context
Public Act 26-149 required reading-intervention guidance, revised aspiring-educator scholarship eligibility and teacher-shortage reporting, and established an American Sign Language working group. It continued and revised paraeducator health-benefit subsidies, including charter-school participation, subject to appropriations and eligibility conditions. The act amends existing scholarship and subsidy programs. It does not guarantee an award to every aspiring teacher or paraeducator, and it does not establish better reading scores or that teacher shortages were resolved.
Signed on 2026-06-04. Approved June 4, 2026. Most provisions specify July 1, 2026; the ASL working group specifies January 1, 2027. The charter-school cost calculation is effective from passage, and the act specifies separate reporting and curriculum-guidance deadlines. The act amends existing scholarship and subsidy programs. It does not guarantee an award to every aspiring teacher or paraeducator, and it does not establish better reading scores or that teacher shortages were resolved.
Why this record is included
Public Act 26-149 required reading-intervention guidance, revised aspiring-educator scholarship eligibility and teacher-shortage reporting, and established an American Sign Language working group. It continued and revised paraeducator health-benefit subsidies, including charter-school participation, subject to appropriations and eligibility conditions. The act amends existing scholarship and subsidy programs. It does not guarantee an award to every aspiring teacher or paraeducator, and it does not establish better reading scores or that teacher shortages were resolved. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance · education · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
AN ACT CONCERNING STUDENT LITERACY, ASPIRING EDUCATORS, AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE AS PART OF THE WORLD LANGUAGES CURRICULUM AND THE PARAEDUCATOR HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN SUBSIDY PROGRAM.
Approved June 4, 2026
Governor Lamont signed the following legislation of the 2026 Regular Session on June 4:
AN ACT CONCERNING STUDENT LITERACY, ASPIRING EDUCATORS, AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE AS PART OF THE WORLD LANGUAGES CURRICULUM AND THE PARAEDUCATOR HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN SUBSIDY PROGRAM.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 11, 2026 · HB 5003 · AN ACT CONCERNING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND WORKING CONDITIONS IN THE STATE. · EnactedConnecticut Legislature · HB 5003
AN ACT CONCERNING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND WORKING CONDITIONS IN THE STATE.
May 11, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Roland J. Lemar · Co-sponsored / Rep. Rebecca Martinez · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kaitlyn Shake · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kara Rochelle · Co-sponsored / Rep. Laurie Sweet · Co-sponsored / Sen. Herron Gaston · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nick Gauthier · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kenneth Gucker · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nicholas Menapace · Co-sponsored / Rep. Toni E. Walker · Co-sponsored / Sen. Julie Kushner · Co-sponsored / Rep. Iris N Sanchez · Co-sponsored / Rep. Marcus Brown · Co-sponsored / Rep. Sarah Keitt · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tom Delnicki · Co-sponsored / Rep. Amy Morrin Bello · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jillian Gilchrest · Co-sponsored / Rep. Aundre Bumgardner · Co-sponsored / Rep. James Sanchez · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael "MJ" Shannon · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kate Farrar · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Smith · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael DiGiovancarlo · Co-sponsored / Rep. Anne M. Hughes · Co-sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gaiewski · Co-sponsored / Rep. Ronald A. Napoli · Co-sponsored / Rep. Farley Santos · Co-sponsored / Rep. Steven Winter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tammy R. Exum · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kai J. Belton · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hubert D. Delany · Co-sponsored / Rep. Joshua M. Hall · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael D. Quinn · Co-sponsored / Rep. Juan R. Candelaria · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bobby G. Gibson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Hilda E. Santiago · Co-sponsored / Rep. Anthony L. Nolan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kevin Brown · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jane M. Garibay · Co-sponsored / Rep. Patricia A. Dillon · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Godfrey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jaime S. Foster · Co-sponsored / Sen. Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox · Co-sponsored / Rep. Gary A. Turco · Co-sponsored / Rep. Derell Wilson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Patricia Billie Miller · Co-sponsored / Sen. John A. Kissel · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 5003 requires the Chief Workforce Officer to develop training on adult-education programs, funding streams, and performance measures by October 1, 2026, and provide it to regional workforce navigators by December 30. Connecticut adult education includes diploma and equivalency pathways. This is a coordination requirement supporting those pathways, not a newly earned diploma or a measured attainment gain.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2026-05-11. Public Act No. 26-12. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Training concerns coordination of existing adult-education programs, which include diploma and equivalency pathways. It may support future adult attainment but does not itself award diplomas or change the earlier age-25-and-older statistic. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma · Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 28. (Effective from passage) (a) Not later than October 1, 2026, the Substitute House Bill No. 5003 Public Act No. 26-12 56 of 124 Chief Workforce Officer shall develop, in consultation with educational institutions, the regional workforce development boards and the Governor's Workforce Council, training on adult education programs in the state, including, but not limited to, funding streams for such programs and performance measures in order to ensure informed collaboration. (b) Not later than December 30, 2026, such training developed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall be provided to regional workforce navigators described in section 31 -3l of the general statutes, as amended by this act.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 11, 2026 · HB 5003 · AN ACT CONCERNING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND WORKING CONDITIONS IN THE STATE. · SignedGovernor · HB 5003
AN ACT CONCERNING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND WORKING CONDITIONS IN THE STATE.
May 11, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Ned Lamont · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Ned Lamont signed HB 5003. HB 5003 requires the Chief Workforce Officer to develop training on adult-education programs, funding streams, and performance measures by October 1, 2026, and provide it to regional workforce navigators by December 30. Connecticut adult education includes diploma and equivalency pathways. This is a coordination requirement supporting those pathways, not a newly earned diploma or a measured attainment gain.
Signed by Ned Lamont on 2026-05-11. Public Act No. 26-12. Approval, statutory effective dates, and implementation are distinct; this entry does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Training concerns coordination of existing adult-education programs, which include diploma and equivalency pathways. It may support future adult attainment but does not itself award diplomas or change the earlier age-25-and-older statistic. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma · Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 28. (Effective from passage) (a) Not later than October 1, 2026, the Substitute House Bill No. 5003 Public Act No. 26-12 56 of 124 Chief Workforce Officer shall develop, in consultation with educational institutions, the regional workforce development boards and the Governor's Workforce Council, training on adult education programs in the state, including, but not limited to, funding streams for such programs and performance measures in order to ensure informed collaboration. (b) Not later than December 30, 2026, such training developed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall be provided to regional workforce navigators described in section 31 -3l of the general statutes, as amended by this act.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 12, 2025 · S 2071 · Disaster Relief Medicaid Act · In CongressU.S. Congress · Connecticut delegation · S 2071
Disaster Relief Medicaid Act
Jun 12, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Richard Blumenthal · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, S 2071 would require Medicaid assistance for qualifying survivors of specified disasters and emergencies, generally during a two-year relief period. Eligibility uses the higher of the home-state Medicaid income limit or 133% of the federal poverty level, raised to 200% for children, pregnant individuals and specified disability beneficiaries, with stated extensions and income exclusions. This is a limited Medicaid coverage proposal, not Social Security retirement or disability cash benefits.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(88)beginning January 1, 2027, provide for making medical assistance available to relief-eligible survivors of disasters during relief coverage periods in accordance with section 1949.; and(2)by adding at the end the following new section:1949.Disaster relief Medicaid for survivors of major disasters(a)In generalNotwithstanding any other provision of this title, a State plan shall provide medical assistance to a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster in accordance with this section.(b)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)DisasterThe term disaster means any of the following:(A)A major disaster that is declared on or after January 1, 2027, by the President in accordance with section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) and which the President has determined warrants individual or public assistance from the Federal Government under such Act. (B)A national emergency declared by the President under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).(C)A public health emergency declared by the Secretary pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).(2)Direct impact area(A)In generalThe term direct impact area means, with respect to a disaster, the geographic area in which the disaster exists.(B)Website posting of direct impact areasAs soon as practicable after a disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable), the Secretary shall post on the websites of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Federal Emergency Management Agency a list of the areas identified as the direct impact areas of the disaster.(3)Home StateThe term home State means, with respect to a survivor of a disaster, the State in which the survivor was a resident (as determined in accordance with section 435.403 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation)) on the date on which the disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable).(4)Relief coverage periodThe term relief coverage period means, with respect to a disaster, the period that begins on the date the disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable) and ends on the day that is 2 years after such date.(5)Relief-eligible survivor(A)In generalSubject to subparagraph (C), the term relief-eligible survivor means an individual who is a survivor of a disaster whose family income does not exceed the higher of—(i)133 percent (or, in the case of a survivor who is a pregnant individual, a child, or a recipient of benefits under title II on the basis of a disability, 200 percent) of the poverty line; or(ii)the income eligibility standard that would otherwise apply to the survivor under the State plan of the survivor's home State (or a waiver of such plan).(B)Disregard of unemployment income and FEMA individual assistance grantsFor purposes of this section, and notwithstanding section 1902(e)(14)(B), the income of a survivor of a disaster shall not include—(i)any amount received by the survivor during the relief coverage period of the disaster under a law of the United States or a State which is in the nature of unemployment compensation; or(ii)any amount received during the relief coverage period of the disaster by the survivor (or the survivor's household) as assistance under a program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.(C)Limitation to relief coverage period(i)In generalExcept as provided in clauses (ii) and (iii), for purposes of this section, an individual shall not be considered to be a relief-eligible survivor on the basis of the individual's status as a survivor of a disaster after the end of the relief coverage period of the disaster.(ii)Continuous eligibility for disaster relief coverage for pregnant and postpartum individualsIn the case of an individual who, while pregnant, receives medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster under a State plan (or a waiver of such a plan) in accordance with this section, such individual shall continue to be eligible for medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor through the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of the pregnancy) (or, if longer, the period of postpartum continuous eligibility that otherwise applies to individuals who, while pregnant, are eligible for medical assistance under the State plan or waiver) ends, without regard to whether the pregnancy ends before or after the end of the relief coverage period of the disaster.(iii)Continuous eligibility for individuals with pending applicationsIf an individual who receives medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster under a State plan (or a waiver of such a plan) in accordance with this section has an application pending for medical assistance under the State plan (or waiver) under this title or for child health assistance or pregnancy-related assistance under a State plan under title XXI (or a waiver of such a plan) on the date that the relief coverage period of the disaster ends, such individual shall continue to be eligible for medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor through the earlier of—(I)the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of such relief coverage period) ends; and(II)the date on which the individual's application for medical assistance, child health assistance, or pregnancy-related assistance (as applicable) is approved or denied.(6)Survivor(A)In generalThe term survivor means, with respect to a disaster, an individual who is described in subparagraph (B) or (C).(B)Residents and evacuees of direct impact areasAn individual described in this subparagraph is an individual who, on the date on which a disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable), has a primary residence in the disaster's direct impact area.(C)Individuals who lost employmentAn individual described in this subparagraph is an individual—(i)whose worksite was located in the disaster's direct impact area;(ii)who was employed by an employer that—(I)conducted an active trade or business in such area on the date on which the disaster was declared (as so described); and(II)was unable to operate such trade or business as a result of the disaster on any day during the disaster's relief coverage period; and(iii)whose employment with such employer was terminated.(D)Treatment of homeless personsIn the case of an individual who is homeless (as such term is defined in section 103(a) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11302(a))) on the date on which a disaster is declared (as so described), the individual's residency for purposes of subparagraph (B) shall be determined in accordance with section 435.403 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).(E)Effect of concurrent eligibility for Medicaid or CHIPAn individual's eligibility for medical assistance under a State plan (or waiver of such plan) (or for child health assistance or pregnancy-related assistance under a State plan under title XXI (or a waiver of such a plan)) on a basis other than under this section shall not prevent the individual from being treated as a survivor under this section, and the rights afforded to an individual who is eligible for or enrolled under a State plan (or waiver) under either such title shall not be affected by the individual's receipt of medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster in accordance with this section.
Executive Order 7H: Non-essential workplace restrictions
Mar 20, 2020 · Directive issued
Ned Lamont · Issued
Reviewed topic context
Executive Order 7H required businesses to use remote work where safely possible and nonessential entities to reduce their workplace in-person workforces by 100 percent from March 23 at 8 p.m. It exempted essential entities, required state guidance and addressed coordination of municipal emergency orders. This is a historical emergency restriction with essential-business exceptions. The order does not establish how many jobs were lost, businesses closed or infections prevented.
Issued on 2020-03-20. Signed March 20, 2020. The workplace restrictions were specified for March 23 at 8 p.m. through April 22, 2020 unless modified, extended or terminated; the coordination provision was immediately effective for the emergency duration. This is a historical emergency restriction with essential-business exceptions. The order does not establish how many jobs were lost, businesses closed or infections prevented.
Why this record is included
Executive Order 7H required businesses to use remote work where safely possible and nonessential entities to reduce their workplace in-person workforces by 100 percent from March 23 at 8 p.m. It exempted essential entities, required state guidance and addressed coordination of municipal emergency orders. This is a historical emergency restriction with essential-business exceptions. The order does not establish how many jobs were lost, businesses closed or infections prevented. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: health · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
BY HIS EXCELLENCY
NED LAMONT
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 7H I ,J
PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
AND RESPONSE - RESTRICTIONS ON WORKPLACES FOR NON-ESSENTIAL
BUSINESSES, COORDINATED RESPONSE EFFORT
WHEREAS, on March 10, 2020, I issued declarations of public health and civil preparedness
emergencies, proclaiming a state of emergency throughout the State of Connecticut as a result of
the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the United States and confirmed spread in
Connecticut; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7, dated March 12, 2020, among other things, prohibited
gatherings of 250 people or more for social and recreational activities, including but not limited
to, community, civic, leisure, and sporting events; parades; concerts; festivals; movie screenings;
plays or performances; conventions; and similar activities, and suspended various statutes and
regulations to protect public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7A, dated March 13, 2020, authorized the Commissioner
of Public Health to restrict entrance into nursing homes and similar facilities to protect people who
are most vulnerable to COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7B, dated March 14, 2020, among other things, modified
in-person open meetings requirements, waived certain rules to mitigate the critical shortage of
hand sanitizer and personal protective equipment (PPE), maintain and increase the availability of
childcare, and provide for increased healthcare resources and facilities; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7C, dated March 15, 2020, among other things, cancelled
classes in public schools for at least two weeks, provided for closure and remote conduct of
business at Department of Motor Vehicle branches, extended deadlines for municipal budget
preparations, and suspended or modified laws and regulations governing health care data and
visitation at ce1iain health care and congregate care settings; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7D, dated March 16, 2020, restricted social and recreational
gatherings of all types to fewer than 50 people, closed bars and restaurants to all service except
food and non-alcoholic beverage takeout and delivery, closed gyms, fitness centers and movie
theaters, and prohibited on-site operations at off-track betting facilities; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7E, dated March 17, 2020, among other things, waived the
requirement for an 180-day school year, suspended fingerprinting availability to that for critical
requirements, extended the duration of various licenses and permits under the authority of the
Commissioner of Emergency Services and public protection, and suspended certain requirements
for recoupment of overpayment and hearings conducted by the Department of Social Services; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7F, dated March 18, 2020, ordered the closure of Large
Shopping Malls, the closure of places of public amusement except public parks and open recreation
areas, expanded Medicaid telehealth coverage, waived in-person service, hearing, and screening
requirements for ce11ain Probate Com1 proceedings in vulnerable group care settings, and clarified
my order cancelling school classes; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7G, dated March 19, 2020, ordered the postponement of
the presidential primaty, suspended non-critical court operations, expanded the availability of
telehealth services, and enacted additional public health measures;
WHEREAS, COVID-19 is a respiratory disease that spreads easily from person to person and
may result in serious illness or death; and
WHEREAS, the World Health Organization has declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic;
and
WHEREAS, the risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19 appears to be higher for
individuals who are 60 years of age or older and for those who have chronic health conditions; and
WHEREAS, to reduce spread ofCOVID-19, the United States Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Connecticut Depattment of Public Health recommend implementation of
community mitigation strategies to increase containment of the virus and to slow transmission of
the virus, including cancellation of gatherings of people and social distancing in smaller
gatherings; and
WHEREAS, to facilitate the most timely and effective response to the COVID-19 emergency
disaster, it is critical for the State of Connecticut to act quickly to gather, coordinate, and deploy
goods, services, professionals, and volunteers of all kinds;
WHEREAS, in a short period of time, COVID-19 has rapidly spread throughout Connecticut,
necessitating updated and more stringent guidance from federal, state, and local officials; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, NED LAMONT, Governor of the State of Connecticut, by vittue of the
authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the State of Connecticut, do hereby
ORDER AND DIRECT:
I. Restrictions on Workplaces for Non-Essential Businesses. Effective on
Mm·ch 23, 2020 at 8:00 p.m. and through April 22, 2020, unless earlier
modified, extended, or terminated by me, all businesses and not-for-profit
entities in the state shall employ, to the maximum extent possible, any
telecommuting or work from home procedures that they can safely employ.
Non-essential businesses or not-for-profit entities shall reduce their in-person
workforces at any workplace locations by 100% not later than March 23, 2020
at 8:00 p.m. Any essential business or entity providing essential goods, services
or functions shall not be subject to these in-person restrictions.
Not later than 8 p.m. on March 22, 2020, the Department of Economic and
Community Development ("DECD") shall issue lawfully binding guidance
about which businesses are essential. Those business shall include, but not be
limited to, the 16 critical infrastructure sectors as defined by the Depa11ment of
Homeland Security and available at https://wv./w.cisa.gov/criticalinfrastructure-sectors, essential health care operations including hospitals,
clinics, dentists, pharmacies, elder care and home health care workers,
companies and institutions involved in the research and development,
manufacture, distribution, warehousing, and supplying of phmmaceuticals,
biotechnology therapies, health care data, consumer health products, medical
devices, diagnostics, equipment, services and any other healthcare related
supplies or services; essential infrastructure, including utilities, wastewater and
drinking water, telecommunications, airports and transportation infrastructure;
manufacturing, including food processing, pharmaceuticals, and industries
supp011ing the essential services required to meet national security
commitments to the federal government and U.S. Militmy; the defense
industrial base, including aerospace, mechanical and software engineers,
manufacturing/production workers, aircraft and weapon system mechanics and
maintainers; essential retail, including grocery stores and big-box stores or
wholesale clubs, provided they also sell groceries; pharmacies, gas stations and
convenience stores; food and beverage retailers (including liquor/package
stores and manufacturer permittees) and restaurants, provided they comply with
previous and future executive orders issued during the existing declared public
health and civil preparedness emergency; essential services including trash and
recycling collection, hauling, and processing, mail and shipping services; news
media; legal and accounting services; banks, insurance companies, check
cashing services, and other financial institutions; providers of basic necessities
to economically disadvantaged populations; construction; vendors of essential
services and goods necessmy to maintain the safety, sanitation and essential
operations of residences or other essential businesses, including pest control
and landscaping services; vendors that provide essential services or products,
including logistics and technology support, child care and services needed to
ensure the continuing operation of government agencies and the provision of
goods, services or functions necessmy for the health, safety and welfare of the
public.
Any other business may be deemed essential after requesting an opinion from
DECD, which shall review and grant such request, should it determine that it is
in the best interest of the state to have the workforce continue at full capacity to
properly respond to this emergency.
2. Coordinated Response Effort. Effective immediately and for the duration of
the public health and civil preparedness emergency, notwithstanding Section
28-8a of the Connecticut General Statutes, in order to ensure the coordinated,
clear and expeditious execution of civil preparedness functions for the
protection of the public health, and pursuant to my emergency powers,
including but not limited to Section 28-9(b) of the Connecticut General Statutes,
no municipal chief executive officer or designee may enact or enforce any order
that conflicts with any provision of any of my Executive Orders or an order
issued by an executive agency pursuant to the existing public health and civil
preparedness emergency, or issue any shelter-in-place order or order
prohibiting travel, unless they first seek and receive written permission from
the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection. The provisions
of this order shall not be deemed to invalidate any order previously issued by a
municipal chief executive or designee or preclude a municipality from
enforcing any existing local rule or ordinance that does not conflict with any
executive order issued pursuant to my March 10, 2020 declaration of public
health and civil preparedness emergency.
Dated at Hartford, Connecticut, this 20th day of March, 2020.
Jt:_ ;/~/t: Denise W. Merrill
Secretary of the State
Ned Lamont
Governor
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
BY HIS EXCELLENCY
NED LAMONT
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 7J
PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
AND RESPONSE- CLARIFYING EO NO. 7H REGARDING OPERATIONS AT NONESSENTIAL BUSINESSES AND PROVIDING FOR RAPID STATE GOVERNMENT
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
WHEREAS, on March 10, 2020, I issued declarations of public health and civil preparedness
emergencies, proclaiming a state of emergency throughout the State of Connecticut as a result of
the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the United States and confirmed spread in
Connecticut; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7, dated March 12, 2020, among other things, prohibited
gatherings of 250 people or more for social and recreational activities, including but not limited
to, community, civic, leisure, and sporting events; parades; conceits; festivals; movie screenings;
plays or performances; conventions; and similar activities, and suspended various statutes and
regulations to protect public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7A, dated March 13, 2020, authorized the Commissioner
of Public Health to restrict entrance into nursing homes and similar facilities to protect people who
are most vulnerable to COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7B, dated March 14, 2020, among other things, modified
in-person open meetings requirements, waived certain rules to mitigate the critical shortage of
hand sanitizer and personal protective equipment (PPE), maintain and increase the availability of
childcare, and provide for increased healthcare resources and facilities; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7C, dated March 15, 2020, among other things, cancelled
classes in public schools for at least two weeks, provided for closure and remote conduct of
business at Depa1tment of Motor Vehicle branches, extended deadlines for municipal budget
preparations, and suspended or modified laws and regulations governing health care data and
visitation at certain health care and congregate care settings; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7D, dated March 16, 2020, restricted social and recreational
gatherings of all types to fewer than 50 people, closed bars and restaurants to all service except
food and non-alcoholic beverage takeout and delivery, closed gyms, fitness centers and movie
theaters, and prohibited on-site operations at off-track betting facilities; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7E, dated March 17, 2020, among other things, waived the
requirement for an 180-day school year, suspended fingerprinting availability to that for critical
requirements, extended the duration of various licenses and permits under the authority of the
Commissioner of Emergency Services and public protection, and suspended ce11ain requirements
for recoupment of overpayment and hearings conducted by the Depat1ment of Social Services; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7F, dated March 18, 2020, ordered the closure of Large
Shopping Malls, the closure of places of public amusement except public parks and open recreation
areas, expanded Medicaid telehealth coverage, waived in-person service, hearing, and screening
requirements for certain Probate Court proceedings in vulnerable group care settings, and clarified
my order cancelling school classes; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7G, dated March 19, 2020, ordered the postponement of
the presidential primmy, suspended non-critical com1 operations, expanded the availability of
telehealth services, and enacted additional public health measures; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 7H, dated March 20, 2020, limited the workplace
operations of non-essential businesses, and on-profit, created a process to designate those that are
essential, and provided for consistency across the state in governmental response to the COVID19 pandemic; and
WHEREAS, my Executive Order No. 71, dated March 21, 2020, among other things, granted
various forms of financial relief to recipients of public health and economic assistance, enacted
measures to protect the health of children in the care of the Depat1ment of Children and Families,
and enacted a series of measures to allow municipalities and their administrative bodies to conduct
essential business while reducing the risk of COVID-19 transmission; and
WHEREAS, COVID-19 is a respirato1y disease that spreads easily from person to person and
may result in serious illness or death; and
WHEREAS, the World Health Organization has declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic;
and
WHEREAS, the risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19 appears to be higher for
individuals who are 60 years of age or older and for those who have chronic health conditions; and
WHEREAS, to reduce spread ofCOVID-19, the United States Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Connecticut Depat1ment of Public Health recommend implementation of
community mitigation strategies to increase containment of the virus and to slow transmission of
the virus, including cancellation of gatherings of fifty people or more and social distancing in
smaller gatherings; and
WHEREAS, if COVID-10 is transmitted to an elderly person, there is a high risk of serious illness
or m011ality; and
WHEREAS, the availability of methadone for ongoing medication assisted treatment is critical
for the treatment of patients by Methadone Maintenance Clinics;
WHEREAS the delive1y of methadone take-home doses will allow for patients that are unable to
travel to the facility an opp01iunity to receive their medication in their home and decrease the risk
of transmission of COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, it is critical that fire service personnel in the midst of certification testing are able to
to meet contractual, bylaw, and probationary requirements as mandated by their employers, and
are able to perform their vital public safety role throughout this state of emergency; and
WHEREAS, Governor Rell's Executive Order No. 27, adopted and extended by Governor
Malloy's Executive Order No. 3, restricts the rehiring of Temporary Worker Retirees (TWRs) to
two calendar years; and
WHEREAS, Public Acts 3-01 and 03-2 prohibit the rehiring of any state employee who
participated in the Early Retirement Incentive Program offered in 2003; and
WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic has created staffing disruptions in state agencies and has
also increased the need for services provided by state agencies, resulting in critical skills sho1iages
in ce1iain areas, including those related to healthcare and public safety; and
WHEREAS, people who have retired from state service already possess the requisite knowledge,
experience and/or licenses and are willing to return to work on a tempora1y basis can help agencies
mitigate the such staffing shortages; and
WHEREAS, during the current public health crisis, accommodations for safe and effective
operations of state agencies and state employees and the clients of these agencies are rapidly
changing and evolving; and
WHEREAS, during the current public health crisis, additional accommodations and facilities
beyond what is currently available in Connecticut may be necessaiy to address the effects of
COVID-19, including but not limited to housing, health care, and medical treatment; and
WHEREAS, it is imperative to the health and safety of the general public that the State of
Connecticut is able to adapt to the current crisis on an emergency basis, and provide essential
human services for the duration of this emergency; and
WHEREAS, it is critical to the protection of the public health and safety that the Department of
Administrative Services and the agencies for which it provides real estate services be able to
respond to these emergency circumstances as expeditiously as possible; and
WHEREAS, in order to effectively respond to and alleviate the effects of the emergency, ce1iain
statutorily mandated procedures for the leasing, assignment and use of real estate for state agencies,
employees and the general public should be condensed and streamlined, to enable the State to enter
into leases relating to emergency needs created by the COVID-19 crisis; and
WHEREAS, effective utilization of leased real estate may require the State to make ce1iain minor
capital improvements, or acquire furniture, fixtures and equipment; and
WHEREAS, non-essential retailers provide useful and necessaty products and employ tens of
thousands of people throughout the state, and with proper precautions, may be able to conduct
limited operations without increasing the risk of transmission of COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, it is critical to the safety and recovery of non-essential businesses and nonprofit
organizations that their buildings and grounds remain secure and in good working order and
continue to receive and process mail and packages; and
WHEREAS, upon a proclamation that a civil preparedness emergency exists, section 28-9(b) of
the Connecticut General Statutes authorizes the modification or suspension in whole or in part by
executive order of any statute or regulation or requirement or part thereof that conflicts with the
efficient and expeditious execution of civil preparedness functions or the protection of public
health;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, NED LAMONT, Governor of the State of Connecticut, by virtue of the
authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the State of Connecticut, do hereby
ORDER AND DIRECT:
1. Clarification of Executive Order No. 7H Regarding Non-Essential Business
Operations. Executive Order No. 7H, dated March 20, 2020 is hereby amended
to permit 1) non-essential retailers to be staffed on site, provided that they may
only offer remote ordering (e.g. phone, internet, mail, dropbox) and delive1y or
curb-side pick-up, and 2) non-essential businesses and nonprofits to allow staff
or third patties on site to the minimum extent necessary to provide security,
maintenance, and receipt of mail and packages, or other services deemed
essential in implementing guidance issued by the Department of Economic and
Community Development.
2. Extension of Time Period for Fire Service Personnel Examinations.
Section 7-3231-lSa (d) (!)of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies is
modified to authorize the Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public
Protection to extend the time by which examination components for a given
level of certification for fire-service personnel must be completed, by 90 days,
provided that he is authorized, in his sole discretion, to revoke such extensions
as he deems necessmy to protect public safety, and to fmther extend such
timeline as he deems necessary.
3. Delivery of Methadone to Homebound Patients by Methadone
Maintenance Clinics. Section 21a-252 of the Connecticut General Statutes is
modified to permit the delivery of take-home doses of methadone for the
treatment of drug dependent patients who are determined to be unable to travel
to the treatment facility due to COVID-19 or related concerns. The
Commissioner of Consumer Protection may issue any implementing orders or
guidance that she deems necessa1y to implement this order.
4. Suspension of Rehiring Procedures and Restrictions on Temporary
Worker Retirees (TWR). In order to enable agencies to meet critical staffing
needs caused by COVID-19 with skilled and experienced employees who
require little to no additional training, Gov. Rell's Executive Order No. 37, Gov.
Malloy's Executive Order No. 3, Section 6(b)(F) of Public Act 03-01 and
Section 6(b)(G) of Public Act 03-02 are suspended to remove the two-year
limitation TWRs and to authorize rehiring employees who participated in
retirement incentive programs. Agencies shall expedite review and approval of
any related extension or hiring requests.
5. Modification of Real Property Statutes to Facilitate Leasing, Repairs,
Alterations and Use of Real Property to Address the COVID-19
Emergency. In accordance with the provisions of Section 28-9(b )(I) of the
Connecticut General Statutes, the following statutes are modified as set forth
herein to authorize the Secretmy of the Office of Policy and Management or her
designee, or the Commissioner of Administrative Services, as applicable, to
take any action they deem necessmy to expedite the leasing or use of real
property by the State of Connecticut to respond to the COVID-19 emergency:
a. subsections (a), (k) and (o) of Section 4b-23 of the Connecticut General
Statutes, which require agencies to submit requests for space for approval
by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management; to obtain
approval for any space that was not included in the state facilities plan, and
require the approval of the Secretmy of the Office of Policy and
Management of all leases, lease renewals and holdover agreements
proposed by the Commissioner of the Department of Administrative
Services;
b. subsections (3) and (4) of Section 4-67g(f) of the Connecticut General
Statutes, which requires the approval of the Secretmy of the Office of
Policy and Management prior to any use of state real property by an entity
other than a state agency, or use of state real prope1ty by a state agency
other than the state agency with custody and control over such state real
prope1ty;
c. subsection (f) of section 4b-3 of the Connecticut General Statutes, as to that
pmtion of the statute that requires the approval of the State Properties
Review Board of real estate acquisitions, sales, leases and subleases
proposed by the Commissioner of Administrative Services;
d. section 4b-29 of the Connecticut General Statutes, only as to that portion
of the statute that requires the approval of the State Prope1ties Review
Board for the Commissioner of Administrative Services to order the
assignment and removal of state agencies to and from real estate available
to the state, through ownership or lease, when he deems it necessaiy to
provide space, facilities and necessaiy accommodations to meet the needs
of any of such agencies and when such assigrunent or removal will be in
the best interests of the state;
e. section 4b-33 of the Co1111ecticut General Statutes in its entirety, which
requires any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation or other
entity, seeking to enter into a lease or lease-purchase agreement with the
state through the Commissioner of Administrative Services to file a sworn
statement with said Commissioner disclosing the names of any persons
having a financial interest in the property or premises involved, and which
provides that failure to make such disclosure is punishable by a civil
penalty;
f. section 4b-34 of the Connecticut General Statutes in its entirety, which
mandates adve1iising for leased space and notification to the Connecticut
Association of Realtors of requirements for leased space by executive
branch agencies;
6. State Contracting Statutes Modified to Facilitate Leasing, Repairs,
Alterations and Use of Real Property to Address the COVID-19
Emergency. In accordance with the provisions of Section 28-9(b )(!) of the
Co1111ecticut General Statutes, the following statutes are modified as set forth
herein to authorize the Secretaiy of the Office of Policy and Management or her
designee, or the Commissioner of Administrative Services, as applicable, to
take any action they deem necessaiy to expedite the state-wide property
transfers, assigrunents of space and leasing or use of real property by the State
of Co1111ecticut to respond to the COVID-19 emergency:
a. sections 4-252 and 9-612(f)(2)(E) of the Co1111ecticut General Statutes
and Governor Malloy's Executive Order 49, which require disclosure of
certain gifts and campaign contributions by state contractors and
prospective state contractors for state contracts over $50,000;
b. section 4e-70 of the Connecticut General Statutes, which requires state
contractors to comply with certain confidentiality requirements;
c. sections 4e-29 and 4e-30 of the Connecticut General Statutes, which
require state contractors to permit certain audit and inspection activities
by the State at the contractors' expense;
d. section 4a-57 requiring competitive solicitations for all purchases and
contracts for supplies, materials, equipment and contractual services,
including, pursuant to section 4d-8, the purchasing, leasing and
contracting for information system and telecommunication system
facilities, equipment and services; and
e. section 4b-91 that sets forth the process for competitive solicitation for
public works contracts.
7. Approval for Transactions Covered by Sections 5 and 6 of This Order.
Department of Administrative Services shall submit all proposed real estate
transactions subject to this order to the Deputy Secretaiy of the Office of Policy
and Management or his/her designee for review and approval. The Deputy
Secreta1y or his/her designee shall have one (1) calendar day to respond to any
proposed transaction pursuant to this Order, after which it shall be deemed
approved.
Unless otherwise specified herein, this order shall take effect inunediately and shall remain
in effect for the duration of the public health and civil preparedness emergency, unless
earlier modified or terminated by me.
Dated at Hartford, Connecticut, this 22nd day of March, 2020.
2!::;~;~ _ Denise W. Merrill
Secretaiy of the State
Ned Lamont
Governor
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Connecticut officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Connecticut candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
16 statements from 9 candidates
2026 Connecticut Governor — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements
Governor Lamont’s Fair Share Healthcare Initiative lowers health insurance premiums by requiring large corporations to take responsibility for the healthcare costs of their workforce instead of shifting those costs onto taxpayers. The plan protects small businesses, closes corporate loopholes, and i…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Governor Lamont’s Fair Share Healthcare Initiative lowers health insurance premiums by requiring large corporations to take responsibility for the healthcare costs of their workforce instead of shifting those costs onto taxpayers. The plan protects small businesses, closes corporate loopholes, and invests more than $100 million annually into making healthcare more affordable for working- and middle-class families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Connecticut is home to over 130,000 veterans, yet progress on veteran homelessness, healthcare access, and job training has stalled. Ryan will streamline veteran services, reduce costs, cut fees, recognize out-of-state licenses, and support employment opportunities for those who served.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Connecticut is home to over 130,000 veterans, yet progress on veteran homelessness, healthcare access, and job training has stalled. Ryan will streamline veteran services, reduce costs, cut fees, recognize out-of-state licenses, and support employment opportunities for those who served.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Ryan advocates for local control while improving housing affordability. His approach reduces construction costs and enables middle-income housing — including accessory dwelling units and mixed-use residential areas — while reducing licensing taxes on trade workers and making it easier to enter appre…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
Ryan advocates for local control while improving housing affordability. His approach reduces construction costs and enables middle-income housing — including accessory dwelling units and mixed-use residential areas — while reducing licensing taxes on trade workers and making it easier to enter apprenticeships.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Equally important, we need to ensure we have a well-trained, educated workforce to meet the demands of a modern economy. It’s time to align education with opportunity and bring back skilled trades and apprenticeships that empower our youth and rebuild our middle class.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Equally important, we need to ensure we have a well-trained, educated workforce to meet the demands of a modern economy. It’s time to align education with opportunity and bring back skilled trades and apprenticeships that empower our youth and rebuild our middle class.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
In Congress, I’ll fight to direct federal funds toward apprenticeships, job training, and technical education that connect students directly with local employers. By building strong partnerships with Connecticut’s manufacturers, defense industries, and small businesses, we can ensure the next genera…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Supporting the Trades – Building Opportunity for Connecticut’s 2nd District
Candidate campaign source
In Congress, I’ll fight to direct federal funds toward apprenticeships, job training, and technical education that connect students directly with local employers. By building strong partnerships with Connecticut’s manufacturers, defense industries, and small businesses, we can ensure the next generation has the skills to step into good-paying jobs right here at home.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Connecticut candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Connecticut incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Connecticut legislators and Connecticut’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Connecticut’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Connecticut incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal
U.S. Senate, Connecticut · D–CT
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Richard BlumenthalU.S. Congress · Connecticut delegation · S 2071
Disaster Relief Medicaid Act
Jun 12, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Richard Blumenthal · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, S 2071 would require Medicaid assistance for qualifying survivors of specified disasters and emergencies, generally during a two-year relief period. Eligibility uses the higher of the home-state Medicaid income limit or 133% of the federal poverty level, raised to 200% for children, pregnant individuals and specified disability beneficiaries, with stated extensions and income exclusions. This is a limited Medicaid coverage proposal, not Social Security retirement or disability cash benefits.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Connecticut evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(88)beginning January 1, 2027, provide for making medical assistance available to relief-eligible survivors of disasters during relief coverage periods in accordance with section 1949.; and(2)by adding at the end the following new section:1949.Disaster relief Medicaid for survivors of major disasters(a)In generalNotwithstanding any other provision of this title, a State plan shall provide medical assistance to a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster in accordance with this section.(b)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)DisasterThe term disaster means any of the following:(A)A major disaster that is declared on or after January 1, 2027, by the President in accordance with section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) and which the President has determined warrants individual or public assistance from the Federal Government under such Act. (B)A national emergency declared by the President under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).(C)A public health emergency declared by the Secretary pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).(2)Direct impact area(A)In generalThe term direct impact area means, with respect to a disaster, the geographic area in which the disaster exists.(B)Website posting of direct impact areasAs soon as practicable after a disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable), the Secretary shall post on the websites of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Federal Emergency Management Agency a list of the areas identified as the direct impact areas of the disaster.(3)Home StateThe term home State means, with respect to a survivor of a disaster, the State in which the survivor was a resident (as determined in accordance with section 435.403 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation)) on the date on which the disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable).(4)Relief coverage periodThe term relief coverage period means, with respect to a disaster, the period that begins on the date the disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable) and ends on the day that is 2 years after such date.(5)Relief-eligible survivor(A)In generalSubject to subparagraph (C), the term relief-eligible survivor means an individual who is a survivor of a disaster whose family income does not exceed the higher of—(i)133 percent (or, in the case of a survivor who is a pregnant individual, a child, or a recipient of benefits under title II on the basis of a disability, 200 percent) of the poverty line; or(ii)the income eligibility standard that would otherwise apply to the survivor under the State plan of the survivor's home State (or a waiver of such plan).(B)Disregard of unemployment income and FEMA individual assistance grantsFor purposes of this section, and notwithstanding section 1902(e)(14)(B), the income of a survivor of a disaster shall not include—(i)any amount received by the survivor during the relief coverage period of the disaster under a law of the United States or a State which is in the nature of unemployment compensation; or(ii)any amount received during the relief coverage period of the disaster by the survivor (or the survivor's household) as assistance under a program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.(C)Limitation to relief coverage period(i)In generalExcept as provided in clauses (ii) and (iii), for purposes of this section, an individual shall not be considered to be a relief-eligible survivor on the basis of the individual's status as a survivor of a disaster after the end of the relief coverage period of the disaster.(ii)Continuous eligibility for disaster relief coverage for pregnant and postpartum individualsIn the case of an individual who, while pregnant, receives medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster under a State plan (or a waiver of such a plan) in accordance with this section, such individual shall continue to be eligible for medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor through the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of the pregnancy) (or, if longer, the period of postpartum continuous eligibility that otherwise applies to individuals who, while pregnant, are eligible for medical assistance under the State plan or waiver) ends, without regard to whether the pregnancy ends before or after the end of the relief coverage period of the disaster.(iii)Continuous eligibility for individuals with pending applicationsIf an individual who receives medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster under a State plan (or a waiver of such a plan) in accordance with this section has an application pending for medical assistance under the State plan (or waiver) under this title or for child health assistance or pregnancy-related assistance under a State plan under title XXI (or a waiver of such a plan) on the date that the relief coverage period of the disaster ends, such individual shall continue to be eligible for medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor through the earlier of—(I)the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of such relief coverage period) ends; and(II)the date on which the individual's application for medical assistance, child health assistance, or pregnancy-related assistance (as applicable) is approved or denied.(6)Survivor(A)In generalThe term survivor means, with respect to a disaster, an individual who is described in subparagraph (B) or (C).(B)Residents and evacuees of direct impact areasAn individual described in this subparagraph is an individual who, on the date on which a disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable), has a primary residence in the disaster's direct impact area.(C)Individuals who lost employmentAn individual described in this subparagraph is an individual—(i)whose worksite was located in the disaster's direct impact area;(ii)who was employed by an employer that—(I)conducted an active trade or business in such area on the date on which the disaster was declared (as so described); and(II)was unable to operate such trade or business as a result of the disaster on any day during the disaster's relief coverage period; and(iii)whose employment with such employer was terminated.(D)Treatment of homeless personsIn the case of an individual who is homeless (as such term is defined in section 103(a) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11302(a))) on the date on which a disaster is declared (as so described), the individual's residency for purposes of subparagraph (B) shall be determined in accordance with section 435.403 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).(E)Effect of concurrent eligibility for Medicaid or CHIPAn individual's eligibility for medical assistance under a State plan (or waiver of such plan) (or for child health assistance or pregnancy-related assistance under a State plan under title XXI (or a waiver of such a plan)) on a basis other than under this section shall not prevent the individual from being treated as a survivor under this section, and the rights afforded to an individual who is eligible for or enrolled under a State plan (or waiver) under either such title shall not be affected by the individual's receipt of medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster in accordance with this section.
Only current Connecticut officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Connecticut statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Connecticut snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Connecticut, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.