Connecticut · individual fact

Connecticut unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate3.3%2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents1,868,8602024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer2%2025 · 11-month average · #5 of 50 · highest first

Connecticut over time

Explore Connecticut readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Connecticut officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Connecticut effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Connecticut change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Connecticut · source units
ConnecticutPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 3.3%2.2%5.6%9%Connecticut, 2015: 5.6%Connecticut, 2016: 4.9%Connecticut, 2017: 4.4%Connecticut, 2018: 3.9%Connecticut, 2019: 3.6%Connecticut, 2020: 8%Connecticut, 2021: 6.4%Connecticut, 2022: 4%Connecticut, 2023: 3.2%Connecticut, 2024: 3.3%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 17National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicConnecticut · Connecticut orders restrictions on nonessential workplaces · 2020-03-20Connecticut workplace restrictionsNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresConnecticut · Connecticut approves literacy, educator and paraeducator benefit changes · 2026-06-04Connecticut educator supportsNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Connecticut Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Connecticut delegation · 1◆ Governor · 3■ Connecticut agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2015-12-012026-09-30

5 of 5 reviewed Connecticut actions match · 5 date markers shown. 17 major events shown separately.

Connecticut · 2024: 3.3% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Connecticut Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodConnecticutRankU.S. benchmark
20243.3%#32 of 504%
20233.2%#24 of 50Not available
20224%#11 of 50Not available
20216.4%#6 of 50Not available
20208%#16 of 50Not available
20193.6%#19 of 50Not available
20183.9%#22 of 50Not available
20174.4%#21 of 50Not available
20164.9%#20 of 50Not available
20155.6%#16 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Connecticut · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Connecticut · 20243.3%
Connecticut rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Connecticut
Annual unemployment rate history in Connecticut2.5%5.6%8.7%20152024
2024 · Connecticut: 3.3% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Connecticut Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodConnecticutCompare
20155.6%
20164.9%
20174.4%
20183.9%
20193.6%
20208%
20216.4%
20224%
20233.2%
20243.3%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 3.3%2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut · your comparison3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Connecticut · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Connecticut · 2025 · 11-month average2%
Connecticut rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 2%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut · your comparison2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Connecticut · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Connecticut · 20252.5%
Connecticut rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Connecticut
Annual real GDP growth history in Connecticut-6.2%0.9%7.9%20152025
2025 · Connecticut: 2.5% · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Connecticut Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodConnecticutCompare
20153.2%
2016-0.3%
20172.1%
20180.3%
20190.3%
2020-4.6%
20213.5%
20223.3%
20231.3%
20242%
20252.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 2.5%2025 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut · your comparison2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Connecticut · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Connecticut · December 202567,000
Connecticut rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Connecticut
Openings · number history in Connecticut-998,4503,618,5008,235,450July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Connecticut: 67,000 · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Connecticut Openings · number history
PeriodConnecticutCompare
July 202569,000
August 202567,000
September 202573,000
October 202574,000
November 202569,000
December 202567,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Connecticut stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Connecticut has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Connecticut · 67,000December 2025 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Connecticut with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut · your comparison67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Connecticut candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

16 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Connecticut Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Ned Lamont

2 statements

Democratic · Governor · CT

Jobs & workforce context

Supporting workforce and middle-income housing

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Supporting workforce and middle-income housing

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ned Lamont — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Ned Lamont
Jobs & workforce context

Governor Lamont’s Fair Share Healthcare Initiative lowers health insurance premiums by requiring large corporations to take responsibility for the healthcare costs of their workforce instead of shifting those costs onto taxpayers. The plan protects small businesses, closes corporate loopholes, and i…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Governor Lamont’s Fair Share Healthcare Initiative lowers health insurance premiums by requiring large corporations to take responsibility for the healthcare costs of their workforce instead of shifting those costs onto taxpayers. The plan protects small businesses, closes corporate loopholes, and invests more than $100 million annually into making healthcare more affordable for working- and middle-class families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ned Lamont — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Ryan Fazio

2 statements

Republican · Governor · CT

Jobs & workforce context

Connecticut is home to over 130,000 veterans, yet progress on veteran homelessness, healthcare access, and job training has stalled. Ryan will streamline veteran services, reduce costs, cut fees, recognize out-of-state licenses, and support employment opportunities for those who served.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Connecticut is home to over 130,000 veterans, yet progress on veteran homelessness, healthcare access, and job training has stalled. Ryan will streamline veteran services, reduce costs, cut fees, recognize out-of-state licenses, and support employment opportunities for those who served.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ryan Fazio — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Ryan Fazio
Jobs & workforce context

Ryan advocates for local control while improving housing affordability. His approach reduces construction costs and enables middle-income housing — including accessory dwelling units and mixed-use residential areas — while reducing licensing taxes on trade workers and making it easier to enter appre…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Ryan advocates for local control while improving housing affordability. His approach reduces construction costs and enables middle-income housing — including accessory dwelling units and mixed-use residential areas — while reducing licensing taxes on trade workers and making it easier to enter apprenticeships.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ryan Fazio — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Connecticut Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Matt Corey

2 statements

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · CT

Jobs & workforce context

Equally important, we need to ensure we have a well-trained, educated workforce to meet the demands of a modern economy. It’s time to align education with opportunity and bring back skilled trades and apprenticeships that empower our youth and rebuild our middle class.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Equally important, we need to ensure we have a well-trained, educated workforce to meet the demands of a modern economy. It’s time to align education with opportunity and bring back skilled trades and apprenticeships that empower our youth and rebuild our middle class.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Matt Corey — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Matt Corey
Jobs & workforce context

Opportunity: Creating a business-friendly environment that supports job creation and entrepreneurship.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Opportunity: Creating a business-friendly environment that supports job creation and entrepreneurship.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Matt Corey — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Connecticut U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · CT

Jobs & workforce context

In Congress, I’ll fight to direct federal funds toward apprenticeships, job training, and technical education that connect students directly with local employers. By building strong partnerships with Connecticut’s manufacturers, defense industries, and small businesses, we can ensure the next genera…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Supporting the Trades – Building Opportunity for Connecticut’s 2nd District

Candidate campaign source

In Congress, I’ll fight to direct federal funds toward apprenticeships, job training, and technical education that connect students directly with local employers. By building strong partnerships with Connecticut’s manufacturers, defense industries, and small businesses, we can ensure the next generation has the skills to step into good-paying jobs right here at home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

George Patrick Austin campaign source 4 ↗
View 2 more statements from George Patrick Austin
Jobs & workforce context

Fund Apprenticeships and Technical Education

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 2026 Campaign Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Fund Apprenticeships and Technical Education

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

George Patrick Austin campaign source 4 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Secure federal investments to strengthen infrastructure, stabilize housing, and grow good-paying jobs

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Dollars and Sense

Candidate campaign source

Secure federal investments to strengthen infrastructure, stabilize housing, and grow good-paying jobs

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

George Patrick Austin campaign source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Connecticut candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Connecticut incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Connecticut legislators and Connecticut’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Connecticut’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Connecticut incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal

U.S. Senate, Connecticut · D–CT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Richard Blumenthal
U.S. Congress · Connecticut delegation · S 2071

Disaster Relief Medicaid Act

Jun 12, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Richard Blumenthal · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Beginning January 1, 2027, S 2071 would require Medicaid assistance for qualifying survivors of specified disasters and emergencies, generally during a two-year relief period. Eligibility uses the higher of the home-state Medicaid income limit or 133% of the federal poverty level, raised to 200% for children, pregnant individuals and specified disability beneficiaries, with stated extensions and income exclusions. This is a limited Medicaid coverage proposal, not Social Security retirement or disability cash benefits.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Connecticut evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(88)beginning January 1, 2027, provide for making medical assistance available to relief-eligible survivors of disasters during relief coverage periods in accordance with section 1949.; and(2)by adding at the end the following new section:1949.Disaster relief Medicaid for survivors of major disasters(a)In generalNotwithstanding any other provision of this title, a State plan shall provide medical assistance to a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster in accordance with this section.(b)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)DisasterThe term disaster means any of the following:(A)A major disaster that is declared on or after January 1, 2027, by the President in accordance with section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) and which the President has determined warrants individual or public assistance from the Federal Government under such Act. (B)A national emergency declared by the President under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).(C)A public health emergency declared by the Secretary pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).(2)Direct impact area(A)In generalThe term direct impact area means, with respect to a disaster, the geographic area in which the disaster exists.(B)Website posting of direct impact areasAs soon as practicable after a disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable), the Secretary shall post on the websites of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Federal Emergency Management Agency a list of the areas identified as the direct impact areas of the disaster.(3)Home StateThe term home State means, with respect to a survivor of a disaster, the State in which the survivor was a resident (as determined in accordance with section 435.403 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation)) on the date on which the disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable).(4)Relief coverage periodThe term relief coverage period means, with respect to a disaster, the period that begins on the date the disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable) and ends on the day that is 2 years after such date.(5)Relief-eligible survivor(A)In generalSubject to subparagraph (C), the term relief-eligible survivor means an individual who is a survivor of a disaster whose family income does not exceed the higher of—(i)133 percent (or, in the case of a survivor who is a pregnant individual, a child, or a recipient of benefits under title II on the basis of a disability, 200 percent) of the poverty line; or(ii)the income eligibility standard that would otherwise apply to the survivor under the State plan of the survivor's home State (or a waiver of such plan).(B)Disregard of unemployment income and FEMA individual assistance grantsFor purposes of this section, and notwithstanding section 1902(e)(14)(B), the income of a survivor of a disaster shall not include—(i)any amount received by the survivor during the relief coverage period of the disaster under a law of the United States or a State which is in the nature of unemployment compensation; or(ii)any amount received during the relief coverage period of the disaster by the survivor (or the survivor's household) as assistance under a program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.(C)Limitation to relief coverage period(i)In generalExcept as provided in clauses (ii) and (iii), for purposes of this section, an individual shall not be considered to be a relief-eligible survivor on the basis of the individual's status as a survivor of a disaster after the end of the relief coverage period of the disaster.(ii)Continuous eligibility for disaster relief coverage for pregnant and postpartum individualsIn the case of an individual who, while pregnant, receives medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster under a State plan (or a waiver of such a plan) in accordance with this section, such individual shall continue to be eligible for medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor through the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of the pregnancy) (or, if longer, the period of postpartum continuous eligibility that otherwise applies to individuals who, while pregnant, are eligible for medical assistance under the State plan or waiver) ends, without regard to whether the pregnancy ends before or after the end of the relief coverage period of the disaster.(iii)Continuous eligibility for individuals with pending applicationsIf an individual who receives medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster under a State plan (or a waiver of such a plan) in accordance with this section has an application pending for medical assistance under the State plan (or waiver) under this title or for child health assistance or pregnancy-related assistance under a State plan under title XXI (or a waiver of such a plan) on the date that the relief coverage period of the disaster ends, such individual shall continue to be eligible for medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor through the earlier of—(I)the end of the month in which the 60-day period (beginning on the last day of such relief coverage period) ends; and(II)the date on which the individual's application for medical assistance, child health assistance, or pregnancy-related assistance (as applicable) is approved or denied.(6)Survivor(A)In generalThe term survivor means, with respect to a disaster, an individual who is described in subparagraph (B) or (C).(B)Residents and evacuees of direct impact areasAn individual described in this subparagraph is an individual who, on the date on which a disaster is declared (as described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), as applicable), has a primary residence in the disaster's direct impact area.(C)Individuals who lost employmentAn individual described in this subparagraph is an individual—(i)whose worksite was located in the disaster's direct impact area;(ii)who was employed by an employer that—(I)conducted an active trade or business in such area on the date on which the disaster was declared (as so described); and(II)was unable to operate such trade or business as a result of the disaster on any day during the disaster's relief coverage period; and(iii)whose employment with such employer was terminated.(D)Treatment of homeless personsIn the case of an individual who is homeless (as such term is defined in section 103(a) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11302(a))) on the date on which a disaster is declared (as so described), the individual's residency for purposes of subparagraph (B) shall be determined in accordance with section 435.403 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).(E)Effect of concurrent eligibility for Medicaid or CHIPAn individual's eligibility for medical assistance under a State plan (or waiver of such plan) (or for child health assistance or pregnancy-related assistance under a State plan under title XXI (or a waiver of such a plan)) on a basis other than under this section shall not prevent the individual from being treated as a survivor under this section, and the rights afforded to an individual who is eligible for or enrolled under a State plan (or waiver) under either such title shall not be affected by the individual's receipt of medical assistance as a relief-eligible survivor of a disaster in accordance with this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Connecticut officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Connecticut statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.