Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.
Median owner-occupied home value$539.4K2020–2024 · #5 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.76K2020–2024 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate66.2%2020–2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Colorado over time
Explore Colorado readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Colorado officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Colorado effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Colorado change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Home-price growth since 2016 Colorado · source units
ColoradoPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
173 of 173 reviewed Colorado actions match · 144 date markers shown. 28 major events shown separately.
Colorado · 2025: +83.1% · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Colorado Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Colorado · state comparison
Home values, rent, and homeownership
Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.
Colorado · 2020–2024$539,400
Colorado rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Median owner-occupied home value
Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.
2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · $539,4002020–2024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$839,100
—
#2
California
$734,700
—
#3
Washington
$564,600
—
#4
Massachusetts
$562,100
—
#5
Colorado · your comparison
$539,400
—
#6
Utah
$489,400
—
#7
Oregon
$477,600
—
#8
New Jersey
$454,400
—
#9
Nevada
$435,400
—
#10
New York
$423,800
—
#11
Maryland
$419,900
—
#12
Idaho
$418,600
—
#13
Rhode Island
$404,200
—
#14
New Hampshire
$402,500
—
#15
Arizona
$394,500
—
#16
Virginia
$383,700
—
#17
Montana
$375,800
—
#18
Connecticut
$366,900
—
#19
Florida
$359,000
—
#20
Alaska
$352,900
—
#21
Delaware
$352,000
—
#22
Minnesota
$329,300
—
#23
Vermont
$316,600
—
#24
Wyoming
$309,700
—
#25
Georgia
$303,300
—
#26
Maine
$296,600
—
#27
North Carolina
$288,900
—
#28
Tennessee
$286,700
—
#29
Texas
$283,800
—
#30
Wisconsin
$266,500
—
#31
Illinois
$263,300
—
#32
South Carolina
$259,000
—
#33
South Dakota
$257,400
—
#34
Pennsylvania
$254,500
—
#35
North Dakota
$249,900
—
#36
New Mexico
$248,100
—
#37
Nebraska
$238,600
—
#38
Michigan
$231,600
—
#39
Missouri
$230,300
—
#40
Indiana
$218,200
—
#41
Kansas
$217,200
—
#42
Louisiana
$216,500
—
#43
Ohio
$214,800
—
#44
Alabama
$209,900
—
#45
Iowa
$208,000
—
#46
Kentucky
$205,600
—
#47
Oklahoma
$199,800
—
#48
Arkansas
$188,000
—
#49
Mississippi
$169,800
—
#50
West Virginia
$162,600
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.
This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.
Colorado · 2020–202452.9%
Colorado rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Renters · spending at least 30% of income
Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.
Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 52.9%2020–2024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Florida
60.1%
—
#2
Hawaii
56.7%
—
#3
Nevada
55.9%
—
#4
California
55.3%
—
#5
Louisiana
54.8%
—
#6
Colorado · your comparison
52.9%
—
#7
Connecticut
52.6%
—
#8
Oregon
52.5%
—
#9
Georgia
52.4%
—
#10
South Carolina
52.1%
—
#11
New York
52.1%
—
#12
Massachusetts
51.8%
—
#13
Texas
51.7%
—
#14
New Jersey
51.6%
—
#15
Maryland
51.5%
—
#16
Arizona
51.4%
—
#17
Mississippi
51.3%
—
#18
Michigan
50.4%
—
#19
New Mexico
50.2%
—
#20
Washington
49.9%
—
#21
Delaware
49.6%
—
#22
North Carolina
48.9%
—
#23
West Virginia
48.9%
—
#24
Tennessee
48.8%
—
#25
Alabama
48.8%
—
#26
Virginia
48.5%
—
#27
Maine
48.4%
—
#28
Vermont
48.4%
—
#29
New Hampshire
48.2%
—
#30
Pennsylvania
48.2%
—
#31
Minnesota
48.1%
—
#32
Indiana
48.1%
—
#33
Rhode Island
48%
—
#34
Illinois
47.9%
—
#35
Utah
47.2%
—
#36
Idaho
46.9%
—
#37
Oklahoma
46.3%
—
#38
Ohio
45.9%
—
#39
Missouri
45.6%
—
#40
Kentucky
45.4%
—
#41
Nebraska
45.1%
—
#42
Arkansas
44.8%
—
#43
Montana
44.8%
—
#44
Alaska
44.6%
—
#45
Iowa
43.9%
—
#46
Wisconsin
43.7%
—
#47
Kansas
43.5%
—
#48
Wyoming
43.1%
—
#49
South Dakota
39.8%
—
#50
North Dakota
38.9%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.
Colorado · 2025+83.1%
Colorado rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Home-price growth since 2016
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.
This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Colorado
2025 · Colorado: +83.1% · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Colorado Home-price growth since 2016 history
Period
Colorado
Compare
2016
+0%
2017
+8.2%
2018
+17.1%
2019
+23.5%
2020
+29.8%
2021
+49.5%
2022
+75.1%
2023
+80%
2024
+86.6%
2025
+83.1%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · +83.1%2025 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Idaho
+141.7%
—
#2
Florida
+114.5%
—
#3
Maine
+113.7%
—
#4
Utah
+113.6%
—
#5
Tennessee
+112.4%
—
#6
Arizona
+112.3%
—
#7
New Hampshire
+110.1%
—
#8
Rhode Island
+108%
—
#9
Georgia
+107.6%
—
#10
North Carolina
+107.1%
—
#11
Montana
+106.7%
—
#12
Nevada
+106.1%
—
#13
South Carolina
+105.5%
—
#14
Washington
+100.2%
—
#15
Indiana
+94.5%
—
#16
Wisconsin
+94%
—
#17
Michigan
+93.7%
—
#18
Ohio
+93.3%
—
#19
Vermont
+92.6%
—
#20
New Jersey
+88.9%
—
#21
Missouri
+86.9%
—
#22
New York
+85.9%
—
#23
Nebraska
+84.6%
—
#24
Massachusetts
+84.3%
—
#24
South Dakota
+84.3%
—
#26
Texas
+83.3%
—
#27
Kentucky
+83.2%
—
#28
Colorado · your comparison
+83.1%
—
#29
Kansas
+82.5%
—
#30
New Mexico
+82.3%
—
#31
Alabama
+81.3%
—
#32
Arkansas
+80.8%
—
#33
Connecticut
+79.8%
—
#34
Pennsylvania
+78.4%
—
#35
Virginia
+76.5%
—
#36
Delaware
+75.4%
—
#37
Oregon
+74.7%
—
#38
California
+72.7%
—
#39
Oklahoma
+71.9%
—
#40
Minnesota
+70%
—
#41
Wyoming
+69.3%
—
#42
Illinois
+65.3%
—
#43
Iowa
+64.2%
—
#44
Mississippi
+63.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
+63%
—
#46
Maryland
+59.4%
—
#47
West Virginia
+58.6%
—
#48
Alaska
+51.9%
—
#49
North Dakota
+45.9%
—
#50
Louisiana
+38.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.
Colorado · 202533,754
Colorado rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total housing units authorized
New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.
A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 33,7542025 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
210,217
—
#2
Florida
178,297
—
#3
California
103,856
—
#4
North Carolina
86,167
—
#5
Georgia
61,196
—
#6
Arizona
51,532
—
#7
South Carolina
45,862
—
#8
Tennessee
43,374
—
#9
New York
38,667
—
#10
Washington
34,913
—
#11
Colorado · your comparison
33,754
—
#12
Ohio
33,640
—
#13
Virginia
33,094
—
#14
Indiana
29,076
—
#15
New Jersey
27,661
—
#16
Utah
26,775
—
#17
Pennsylvania
25,709
—
#18
Wisconsin
25,569
—
#19
Michigan
23,075
—
#20
Minnesota
20,947
—
#21
Alabama
19,061
—
#22
Illinois
18,551
—
#23
Nevada
18,540
—
#24
Idaho
17,944
—
#25
Missouri
17,474
—
#26
Oklahoma
15,513
—
#27
Arkansas
15,492
—
#28
Kentucky
14,940
—
#29
Oregon
14,839
—
#30
Louisiana
14,203
—
#31
Iowa
13,664
—
#32
Maryland
13,358
—
#33
Massachusetts
12,477
—
#34
Nebraska
10,596
—
#35
Kansas
10,299
—
#36
Mississippi
8,405
—
#37
New Mexico
7,747
—
#38
Connecticut
7,273
—
#39
Maine
6,979
—
#40
Delaware
6,468
—
#41
South Dakota
5,305
—
#42
Montana
5,258
—
#43
New Hampshire
5,030
—
#44
West Virginia
3,962
—
#45
Hawaii
3,708
—
#46
North Dakota
2,440
—
#47
Vermont
2,294
—
#48
Wyoming
2,238
—
#49
Rhode Island
1,738
—
#50
Alaska
848
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
173 of 173 reviewed Colorado actions · newest first
Sep 2, 2026 · AG 2026-09-02 · Attorney General Weiser secures settlement protecting renters from illegal tenant screening practices · Reported actionColorado agencies · AG 2026-09-02
Attorney General Weiser secures settlement protecting renters from illegal tenant screening practices
Sep 2, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Phil Weiser · Settled
FactVote reviewed summary
Reached a settlement requiring Avail and PK Management to stop using prohibited criminal-history information to deny rental housing and to revise tenant screening practices.
Reported in the official release dated 2026-09-02. The release date may follow a filing or court order. Litigation, guidance and proposed settlements do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
and PK Management, LLC resolving allegations that the companies illegally denied prospective tenants housing by considering criminal history information that Colorado law prohibits landlords from using during the rental application process. The attorney general alleged the companies violated Colorado’s Rental Application Fairness Act and the Colorado Consumer Protection Act by using prohibited criminal history information to deny housing to prospective tenants. According to the complaint, applicants were denied housing based on arrests, deferred judgments, and convictions that occurred more than five years before they applied, including some convictions that were more than 20 years old. “Housing provides the foundation people need to build stable lives. Colorado law recognizes that arrests that never resulted in convictions and old criminal records generally should not prevent someone from finding a place to live,” said Attorney General Weiser. “People deserve the opportunity to move forward, and landlords remain responsible for ensuring their tenant screening practices comply with Colorado law, whether they conduct background checks themselves or rely on a third-party screening company.” The attorney general’s investigation found that Avail and PK managed nearly 4,000 rental units at more than a dozen properties across Colorado, many of them affordable housing communities supported through government programs, including some that specifically serve seniors. The companies used a third-party background screening service and allegedly continued denying applicants based on criminal history information that Colorado law prohibits landlords from considering. Under the settlement, Avail and PK must: Comply with the Rental Application Fairness Act which prohibits landlords from considering criminal convictions older than five years except where Colorado law expressly allows. Stop considering arrests, pending charges, and other non-conviction records. Revise tenant screening policies and consumer-facing materials to comply with Colorado law. Review third-party background screening recommendations instead of automatically relying on screening vendors.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 29, 2026 · AG 2026-07-29 · Rent payment processing company Domuso agrees to comply with Colorado consumer and credit laws · Reported actionColorado agencies · AG 2026-07-29
Rent payment processing company Domuso agrees to comply with Colorado consumer and credit laws
Jul 29, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Phil Weiser · Settled
FactVote reviewed summary
Required Domuso to cap rent-payment card fees, end fee sharing, and provide cost-free payment alternatives. Payment-processing fees are separate from the Census definition of contract rent.
Reported in the official release dated 2026-07-29. The release date may follow a filing or court order. Litigation, guidance and proposed settlements do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
July 29, 2026 (DENVER) – Attorney General Phil Weiser today announced that Domuso, Inc., a California-based rent payment processor, has entered into a settlement requiring the company to comply with Colorado consumer lending and consumer protection laws and to reform its fee practices for Colorado renters and housing providers. Domuso offers digital rent payment options for tenants, including “Certified Funds” payment methods such as credit or debit card and ACH transactions. Following an investigation by the Colorado Attorney General’s Office, the state determined that a 3.25% Certified Funds Fee that Domuso charged to tenants when they used a credit or debit card to pay rent was an illegal surcharge under state law. Colorado law generally prohibits imposing a surcharge greater than 2% of the overall payment and requires that companies disclose the fee to consumers. In addition, the revenue generated from these percentage-based card fees was so substantial that Domuso had a business incentive to promote card payment options. The company had a fee sharing agreement with at least one property to increase Domuso’s and the property’s financial benefit when tenants paid percentage-based card fees. Under the settlement, Domuso must cap fees related to rent payments, end fee-sharing arrangements with Colorado properties, and provide cost-free payment alternatives to all Colorado renters. Domuso will also pay $100,000 to the state of Colorado to be used for consumer protection efforts, restitution, and enforcement activities. “Colorado renters deserve transparent, fair, and accessible payment options,” said Attorney General Weiser. “This agreement ensures that Domuso’s fees comply with our consumer protection laws, ends improper fee-sharing practices, and promotes the continued availability of cost-free and traditional payment methods like paper checks.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 7, 2026 · AG 2026-07-07 · Attorney General Phil Weiser sues HUD to block new changes to homelessness funding · Reported actionColorado agencies · AG 2026-07-07
Attorney General Phil Weiser sues HUD to block new changes to homelessness funding
Jul 7, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Phil Weiser · Filed lawsuit
FactVote reviewed summary
Challenged new HUD funding conditions that cap support for permanent housing and threaten existing tenants with displacement.
Reported in the official release dated 2026-07-07. The release date may follow a filing or court order. Litigation, guidance and proposed settlements do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Department of Housing and Urban Development is attempting yet again to unlawfully cap funding for permanent housing projects, in a move that would result in tens of thousands of people losing their homes, Attorney General Phil Weiser and a multistate coalition argued in a lawsuit filed in federal court today. Just last month, the states won a separate case against HUD in federal court in Rhode Island regarding the agency’s decision last year to impose illegal conditions on billions of dollars in funding for the Continuum of Care (CoC) program, which supports housing and other services for people experiencing housing instability or homelessness. Congress has prioritized stability in the way the funds are allocated, and the vast majority of CoC funds have traditionally supported permanent housing and other projects that have been shown to work. On June 1, HUD issued a notice of funding opportunity that creates a $1.3 billion set-aside for new projects prioritizing such things as transitional housing, which results in a de facto cap on permanent housing. That shift threatens housing for at least 97,000 residents of CoC-funded permanent housing across the country, according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness. “Again, HUD is trying to cap funding for permanent housing and set other unlawful conditions on the funds. Without action by the court, permanent housing projects will lose funding or see it reduced, resulting in tens of thousands of people being evicted back to the streets, with states and local governments left to pick up the pieces. These actions will make it harder for states to address homelessness,” said Attorney General Weiser. The states argue that HUD’s actions violate the Administrative Procedure Act for, among other things, failing to proceed with notice-and-comment rulemaking and being arbitrary and capricious. They ask the court to declare that the challenged conditions are illegal and block HUD from implementing them.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 18, 2026 · AG 2026-06-18 · Attorney General Phil Weiser announces $7M settlement with corporate landlord LivCor for role in algorithmic rent-setting scheme · Reported actionColorado agencies · AG 2026-06-18
Attorney General Phil Weiser announces $7M settlement with corporate landlord LivCor for role in algorithmic rent-setting scheme
Jun 18, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Phil Weiser · Settled
FactVote reviewed summary
Announced a multistate LivCor settlement restricting use of competitors’ confidential data in algorithmic rent setting and requiring cooperation in the remaining litigation.
Reported in the official release dated 2026-06-18. The release date may follow a filing or court order. Litigation, guidance and proposed settlements do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The settlement resolves allegations that LivCor used RealPage’s revenue management system to fix rental prices with competing landlords by illegally sharing and gathering confidential pricing information. This conduct interfered with the normal competitive process and enabled landlords to keep prices higher, even in conditions when landlords naturally would lower prices. Under today’s settlement (PDF), LivCor agrees to not use software offered by any company that uses competitively sensitive information to fix rent prices and agrees to cooperate in the ongoing prosecution of RealPage and other defendant landlords. “Coloradans are getting squeezed by the high cost of housing. It’s outrageous that corporate landlords use algorithms to collude, artificially hike rents, and maximize their profits off the backs of workers, seniors, families who are just looking for a place to live. Ending the use of algorithmic rental price fixing is just one of many tools we need to level the playing field. Today’s settlement will end this anticompetitive conduct and bring fairness back to the market for renters,” said Attorney General Weiser. RealPage uses algorithmic models to recommend price increases to subscribers. As alleged the January 2025 antitrust lawsuit, LivCor and other landlords, including five co-defendants, shared competitively sensitive data to generate pricing recommendations using RealPage’s algorithms. LivCor and other landlords discussed competitively sensitive topics — including pricing strategies, rents, and selected parameters for RealPage’s software — directly with each other. RealPage knew what competing landlords were charging and could increase profits for landlords by using that nonpublic information to recommend landlords set or raise their prices uniformly, thereby eliminating competition. This scheme left renters with no choice but to pay artificially high prices. As of February 2025, LivCor managed 10 properties in Colorado totaling 3,352 units that used RealPage’s pricing software. Today’s settlement, subject to court approval, requires LivCor to pay $7 million in penalties and fees to the states.
Rep. Kyle Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Rick Taggart · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored / Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1360: Affordable Housing Financing Fund. Official enacted-bill summary: The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026, and makes 3 corresponding adjustments to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund). First, the act reduces the July 1, 2026, transfer from the fund to the financing fund by the amount of the June 30, 2026, transfer from the state affordable housing fund. Second, for the 2026-27 state fiscal year only, the act adjusts the prioritization of programs funded by the financing fund so that the programs are funded in the following order: The concessionary debt program, the affordable housing equity program, and the land banking program. Third, the act ensures that this transfer does not reduce the amount that may be spent on administrative expenses to implement programs funded by the financing fund in the 2026-27 state fiscal year and pools the costs of administering these programs between the administrator and the office of economic development for state fiscal years beginning with the 2026-27 state fiscal year. Under current law, if legislative council staff's March economic and revenue forecast projects that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit, the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund. The act allows for the general assembly to so reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund for the 2025-26 state fiscal year as a result of revenue forecasts projecting that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2026-05-28: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026, and makes 3 corresponding adjustments to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund). First, the act reduces the July 1, 2026, transfer from the fund to the financing fund by the amount of the June 30, 2026, transfer from the state affordable housing fund. Second, for the 2026-27 state fiscal year only, the act adjusts the prioritization of programs funded by the financing fund so that the programs are funded in the following order: The concessionary debt program, the affordable housing equity program, and the land banking program. Third, the act ensures that this transfer does not reduce the amount that may be spent on administrative expenses to implement programs funded by the financing fund in the 2026-27 state fiscal year and pools the costs of administering these programs between the administrator and the office of economic development for state fiscal years beginning with the 2026-27 state fiscal year. Under current law, if legislative council staff's March economic and revenue forecast projects that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit, the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund. The act allows for the general assembly to so reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund for the 2025-26 state fiscal year as a result of revenue forecasts projecting that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 28, 2026 · HB26-1360 · HB26-1360 — Affordable Housing Financing Fund · Signed by governorGovernor · HB26-1360
HB26-1360 — Affordable Housing Financing Fund
May 28, 2026 · Signed by governor
Jared Polis · Signed
Reviewed topic context
HB 26-1360 directs a $130 million transfer from the state affordable-housing fund to the general fund on June 30, 2026, reduces the subsequent financing-fund transfer, and changes program funding priorities and administration. The transfer is directed out of the housing fund. The law does not establish that the transfer was executed, add $130 million for housing, or measure homes built or preserved.
Signed on 2026-05-28. Governor approval May 28, 2026. The specified June 30 transfer and July 1 program-funding dates are separate from this approval marker. The transfer is directed out of the housing fund. The law does not establish that the transfer was executed, add $130 million for housing, or measure homes built or preserved.
Why this record is included
HB 26-1360 directs a $130 million transfer from the state affordable-housing fund to the general fund on June 30, 2026, reduces the subsequent financing-fund transfer, and changes program funding priorities and administration. The transfer is directed out of the housing fund. The law does not establish that the transfer was executed, add $130 million for housing, or measure homes built or preserved. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026,
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Colorado officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Colorado candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
23 statements from 13 candidates
2026 Colorado Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
Colorado families are being squeezed from every direction. The cost of housing, groceries, insurance, utilities, and other necessities continue to rise, while government makes taxpayers pay more so government spending can continue to rise. Michael believes government has a responsibility to live wit…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Saving Taxpayer Dollars
Candidate campaign source
Colorado families are being squeezed from every direction. The cost of housing, groceries, insurance, utilities, and other necessities continue to rise, while government makes taxpayers pay more so government spending can continue to rise. Michael believes government has a responsibility to live within its means and deliver real results for the people who pay the bills.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
Fighting crime is also an important part of protecting Colorado families from rising costs. Every stolen vehicle, burglarized home, and shoplifted business creates real financial costs. Motor vehicle theft contributes to insurance losses and rising premiums. Property crime creates costs for homeowne…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Saving Taxpayer Dollars
Candidate campaign source
Fighting crime is also an important part of protecting Colorado families from rising costs. Every stolen vehicle, burglarized home, and shoplifted business creates real financial costs. Motor vehicle theft contributes to insurance losses and rising premiums. Property crime creates costs for homeowners and insurers. Retail theft forces businesses to spend more on security and absorb lost inventory, and those costs are ultimately passed on to the consumer.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
As Governor, I will prioritize veteran mental health services, workforce opportunities, housing support, and improved coordination between state agencies and veteran organizations.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will prioritize veteran mental health services, workforce opportunities, housing support, and improved coordination between state agencies and veteran organizations.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Invest in: Our workforce, expanding job training, apprenticeships, and career pathways aligned with employer and worker needs. Housing, childcare and health care, helping workers live near their jobs. Infrastructure, improving transportation, broadband, and public safety. Our land, air and water, ke…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Invest in: Our workforce, expanding job training, apprenticeships, and career pathways aligned with employer and worker needs. Housing, childcare and health care, helping workers live near their jobs. Infrastructure, improving transportation, broadband, and public safety. Our land, air and water, keeping our communities safe and thriving.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I will require every state or local agency proposing a new fee or fee increase to undergo a full TABOR compliance review under C.R.S. § 24-77-102 to determine whether the charge is actually a tax that requires voter approval. Agencies will be required to publicly disclose the purpose of…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will require every state or local agency proposing a new fee or fee increase to undergo a full TABOR compliance review under C.R.S. § 24-77-102 to determine whether the charge is actually a tax that requires voter approval. Agencies will be required to publicly disclose the purpose of each fee, projected revenue, and the specific programs that will receive the funds before implementation. This policy defends the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (Colo. Const. art. X, § 20) and prevents government from using disguised revenue mechanisms that drive up the cost of homeownership, utilities, and essential services. My administration will close loopholes that circumvent voter oversight.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My administration will direct the Division of Insurance, under C.R.S. § 10-1-108, to conduct market analyses, restrict excessive rate practices, and create competitive reinsurance mechanisms to stabilize homeowner premiums. Colorado must attract new insurers into the market, reduce regulatory bottle…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
My administration will direct the Division of Insurance, under C.R.S. § 10-1-108, to conduct market analyses, restrict excessive rate practices, and create competitive reinsurance mechanisms to stabilize homeowner premiums. Colorado must attract new insurers into the market, reduce regulatory bottlenecks, and expand risk-pooling programs—especially in rural and wildfire-prone regions.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
No veteran who served this country should be left without a home. My administration will make veteran homelessness a priority and work to ensure every veteran has a stable place to live.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans
Candidate campaign source
No veteran who served this country should be left without a home. My administration will make veteran homelessness a priority and work to ensure every veteran has a stable place to live.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
If elected Governor, I will urge all municipalities to adopt expedited permitting standards for residential construction under C.R.S. § 29-20-201. Local governments will be required to approve or deny complete applications within clear statutory timeframes. I will direct the Department of Local Affa…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
If elected Governor, I will urge all municipalities to adopt expedited permitting standards for residential construction under C.R.S. § 29-20-201. Local governments will be required to approve or deny complete applications within clear statutory timeframes. I will direct the Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) to develop model permitting frameworks and provide technical assistance to streamline zoning reviews, environmental clearances, and utility coordination. This reform reflects the State’s responsibility to promote the “general welfare” under Colo. Const. art. II, § 3. By accelerating housing development while maintaining essential safety requirements, my administration will lower construction costs, increase supply, and help stabilize home prices across Colorado.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
• Housing that working people can actually afford • Infrastructure that creates good-paying jobs and a strong economy • Clean energy that lowers your bills and fights global warming
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Investing in Our Future
Candidate campaign source
• Housing that working people can actually afford • Infrastructure that creates good-paying jobs and a strong economy • Clean energy that lowers your bills and fights global warming
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Colorado candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Colorado incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Colorado legislators and Colorado’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Colorado’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
177 matching sponsorships or proposals · 57 Colorado incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Alex Valdez
Colorado House of Representatives, District 5 · D–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Alex ValdezColorado Legislature · HB23-1068
Pet Animal Ownership In Housing
Jun 7, 2023 · Enacted
Rep. Alex Valdez · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB23-1068: Pet Animal Ownership In Housing. Official enacted-bill summary: For purposes of these provisions, a dwelling includes a dwelling unit that is a structure or part of a structure that is used as a home, residence, or sleeping place by a tenant. The act also requires that an officer executing a writ of restitution inspect the premises for pet animals and give any pet animal found to the tenant of the premises if the tenant is present at the time the writ is executed. If a tenant is not present, the officer must contact a local authority in charge of animal control to take custody of any pet animal. The landlord shall provide the local animal control authority with access to the premises to allow the pet animals to be removed or secured and with the name and contact information for the tenant and shall leave contact information for the tenant as to where the pet animal has been taken by posting notice in a visible place at the premises. The act provides that no pet animal shall be removed from the premises during the execution of a writ and left unattended on public or private property. The act also limits the amount of an additional security deposit a landlord can receive from a prospective or current tenant as a condition of permitting the tenant's pet animal to reside at the residential premises to a refundable $300. Additionally, a landlord is prohibited from demanding or receiving additional rent from a tenant as a condition of permitting the tenant's pet animal to reside at the residential premises in an amount that exceeds $35 per month or 1.5% per month of the tenant's monthly rent, whichever is greater. The act also excludes pet animals from the categories of a tenant's personal property that a person who rents furnished or unfurnished rooms or apartments may place a lien on for unpaid board, lodging, or rent. APPROVED by Governor June 7, 2023 EFFECTIVE January 1, 2024 NOTE: This act was passed without a safety clause. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2023-06-07: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
For purposes of these provisions, a dwelling includes a dwelling unit that is a structure or part of a structure that is used as a home, residence, or sleeping place by a tenant. The act also requires that an officer executing a writ of restitution inspect the premises for pet animals and give any pet animal found to the tenant of the premises if the tenant is present at the time the writ is executed. If a tenant is not present, the officer must contact a local authority in charge of animal control to take custody of any pet animal. The landlord shall provide the local animal control authority with access to the premises to allow the pet animals to be removed or secured and with the name and contact information for the tenant and shall leave contact information for the tenant as to where the pet animal has been taken by posting notice in a visible place at the premises. The act provides that no pet animal shall be removed from the premises during the execution of a writ and left unattended on public or private property. The act also limits the amount of an additional security deposit a landlord can receive from a prospective or current tenant as a condition of permitting the tenant's pet animal to reside at the residential premises to a refundable $300. Additionally, a landlord is prohibited from demanding or receiving additional rent from a tenant as a condition of permitting the tenant's pet animal to reside at the residential premises in an amount that exceeds $35 per month or 1.5% per month of the tenant's monthly rent, whichever is greater. The act also excludes pet animals from the categories of a tenant's personal property that a person who rents furnished or unfurnished rooms or apartments may place a lien on for unpaid board, lodging, or rent. APPROVED by Governor June 7, 2023 EFFECTIVE January 1, 2024 NOTE: This act was passed without a safety clause. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1284: Requirements for Tenant Utility Billing. Official proposal summary: The bill establishes requirements for landlords, unit owners, and associations governing common interest communities (association) for billing a tenant for utility service. A landlord, a unit owner, or an association may individually bill a tenant using a submeter or bill a tenant through a ratio utility billing system, which is a system that allocates utility service costs among individual tenants based on a unit's square footage, occupancy, or other physical characteristics. Starting on January 1, 2027, all new residential construction must install individual submeters for each individual unit to measure water consumption for each unit. A tenant's utility bill for water utility service must be calculated based on the individual submeter reading. For existing residential properties and other types of utility service other than water service, the landlord, unit owner, or association may use a ratio utility billing system if they meet certain requirements. A landlord, a unit owner, or an association shall disclose to a tenant in the tenant's rental agreement the method by which the tenant's utility bills will be calculated. If a landlord, a unit owner, or an association uses a ratio utility billing system, they must deduct at least 10% of the total utility service bill before allocating individual costs to tenants in order to account for utility service to common areas of a residential premises. If a landlord, a unit owner, or an association is found in violation of the provisions of the bill, the aggrieved tenant may file a civil action in court and, if the tenant prevails, recover actual damages from utility bill overages, additional damages in an amount not to exceed 25% of the utility bill overages, and any attorney fees or court costs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2026-03-18: House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Postpone Indefinitely. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill establishes requirements for landlords, unit owners, and associations governing common interest communities (association) for billing a tenant for utility service. A landlord, a unit owner, or an association may individually bill a tenant using a submeter or bill a tenant through a ratio utility billing system, which is a system that allocates utility service costs among individual tenants based on a unit's square footage, occupancy, or other physical characteristics. Starting on January 1, 2027, all new residential construction must install individual submeters for each individual unit to measure water consumption for each unit. A tenant's utility bill for water utility service must be calculated based on the individual submeter reading. For existing residential properties and other types of utility service other than water service, the landlord, unit owner, or association may use a ratio utility billing system if they meet certain requirements. A landlord, a unit owner, or an association shall disclose to a tenant in the tenant's rental agreement the method by which the tenant's utility bills will be calculated. If a landlord, a unit owner, or an association uses a ratio utility billing system, they must deduct at least 10% of the total utility service bill before allocating individual costs to tenants in order to account for utility service to common areas of a residential premises. If a landlord, a unit owner, or an association is found in violation of the provisions of the bill, the aggrieved tenant may file a civil action in court and, if the tenant prevails, recover actual damages from utility bill overages, additional damages in an amount not to exceed 25% of the utility bill overages, and any attorney fees or court costs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Colorado House of Representatives, District 53 · D–CO
5 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Andrew BoeseneckerColorado Legislature · HB26-1313
Adjust Requirements Statewide Affordable Housing Fund
May 26, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Rebekah Stewart · Sponsored / Sen. Matt Ball · Sponsored / Sen. Lisa Frizell · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1313: Adjust Requirements Statewide Affordable Housing Fund. Official enacted-bill summary: Current law requires a local government or a tribal government desiring to receive funding from the statewide affordable housing fund to have filed with the division of housing of the department of local affairs (division) a commitment specifying how, within a 3-year cycle, affordable housing units within the local or tribal government's territorial boundaries will be increased by 3% each year over the baseline number of affordable housing units (baseline number). The baseline number resets every 3 years for the next cycle. To be eligible for funding from the statewide affordable housing fund, a local or tribal government is required to file a commitment with the division and achieve the 3% increase over the baseline number each year during the 3-year cycle. The act changes the requirements for the 3-year cycle beginning on January 1, 2027, and each 3-year cycle thereafter. A local government desiring to receive funding from the statewide affordable housing fund is no longer required to increase affordable housing units by 3% above the baseline each year, but is instead required to meet the target increase number of affordable housing units (target increase number).
2026-05-26: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Current law requires a local government or a tribal government desiring to receive funding from the statewide affordable housing fund to have filed with the division of housing of the department of local affairs (division) a commitment specifying how, within a 3-year cycle, affordable housing units within the local or tribal government's territorial boundaries will be increased by 3% each year over the baseline number of affordable housing units (baseline number). The baseline number resets every 3 years for the next cycle. To be eligible for funding from the statewide affordable housing fund, a local or tribal government is required to file a commitment with the division and achieve the 3% increase over the baseline number each year during the 3-year cycle. The act changes the requirements for the 3-year cycle beginning on January 1, 2027, and each 3-year cycle thereafter. A local government desiring to receive funding from the statewide affordable housing fund is no longer required to increase affordable housing units by 3% above the baseline each year, but is instead required to meet the target increase number of affordable housing units (target increase number).
Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Javier Mabrey · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored / Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1001: Housing Developments on Qualifying Properties. Official enacted-bill summary: A qualifying property is real property that contains no more than 5 acres of land and is owned by: A school district; A state college or university; A board of cooperative services; A housing authority; A local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties; A nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; or A nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property. If a subject jurisdiction requests, as part of an initial development application, that a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing provide documentation that the nonprofit meets required criteria, the nonprofit organization shall provide the documentation. A subject jurisdiction is not required to allow a residential development on a qualifying property if the subject jurisdiction implements a transferable development rights program on the qualifying property and if the transferable development rights program includes a policy for affordable resident housing that is restricted in ownership and occupancy in perpetuity.
2026-03-25: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A qualifying property is real property that contains no more than 5 acres of land and is owned by: A school district; A state college or university; A board of cooperative services; A housing authority; A local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties; A nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; or A nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property. If a subject jurisdiction requests, as part of an initial development application, that a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing provide documentation that the nonprofit meets required criteria, the nonprofit organization shall provide the documentation. A subject jurisdiction is not required to allow a residential development on a qualifying property if the subject jurisdiction implements a transferable development rights program on the qualifying property and if the transferable development rights program includes a policy for affordable resident housing that is restricted in ownership and occupancy in perpetuity.
Sen. Dylan Roberts · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Richardson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of SB26-001: Workforce Housing & Housing Tax Credit. Official enacted-bill summary: The act allows a board of county commissioners and the governing body of a municipality to sell and dispose of property owned by the county or municipality, as applicable, to provide for affordable housing and allows a municipality to enter into a long-term rental or lease agreement for the development of affordable housing. The act allows for the approval of a mutijurisdictional housing authority at a biennial local election instead of only during a general election or an election held on the first Tuesday in November of an odd-numbered year. The ballot question about establishing the authority may be combined with a question about a tax, impact fee, multiple-fiscal year debt, or other financial obligation. The act allows a board of county commissioners to use ad valorem tax revenue for housing authorities, housing programs, and workforce housing. The act entitles an entity subject to income tax to which a middle-income housing tax credit is transferred by a governmental entity or quasi-governmental entity to claim the credit without owning an interest in a qualified project. The sale and use of construction materials by contractors is exempt from taxation if the materials are used by the state in its governmental capacity only. The act provides that 'governmental capacity' includes the construction of workforce housing projects undertaken by counties. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2026-03-25: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act allows a board of county commissioners and the governing body of a municipality to sell and dispose of property owned by the county or municipality, as applicable, to provide for affordable housing and allows a municipality to enter into a long-term rental or lease agreement for the development of affordable housing. The act allows for the approval of a mutijurisdictional housing authority at a biennial local election instead of only during a general election or an election held on the first Tuesday in November of an odd-numbered year. The ballot question about establishing the authority may be combined with a question about a tax, impact fee, multiple-fiscal year debt, or other financial obligation. The act allows a board of county commissioners to use ad valorem tax revenue for housing authorities, housing programs, and workforce housing. The act entitles an entity subject to income tax to which a middle-income housing tax credit is transferred by a governmental entity or quasi-governmental entity to claim the credit without owning an interest in a qualified project. The sale and use of construction materials by contractors is exempt from taxation if the materials are used by the state in its governmental capacity only. The act provides that 'governmental capacity' includes the construction of workforce housing projects undertaken by counties. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Prime sponsorship of HB24-1175: Local Goverments Rights to Property for Affordable Housing. Official enacted-bill summary: For multifamily rental properties that are existing affordable housing consisting of not less than five units, a local government has a right of first refusal to make a matched offer for the purchase of such property, subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. Existing affordable housing is housing that is subject to one or more restricted use covenants or similar recorded agreements to ensure affordability consistent with affordable housing financial assistance requirements. The act requires the seller of such property to give notice to the local government and to the Colorado housing and finance authority at least 2 years before the final expiration of the last remaining affordability restriction on the property of the date of such expiration, a second notice not less than 6 months before the final expiration of the last remaining affordability restriction, and additional notice when the seller takes certain actions as a precursor to selling the property. Sharing information provided by the seller in certain notices is subject to execution of a nondisclosure agreement. Upon receiving the third notice indicating an intent to sell the property or of a potential sale of the property, the local government has 14 calendar days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 30 calendar days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 60 calendar days of the acceptance of the local government's offer; except that, if the seller has received an entirely cash offer from a third-party buyer, then the local government must agree to close within the same time period as is set forth in the third-party buyer's offer. If the price as listed in the seller's notice is reduced by 5% or more or if the required terms and conditions of an acceptable offer that has been communicated to the local government materially change, the seller must provide notice of the change within 7 days and the local government may exercise or re-exercise its right of first refusal.
2024-05-30: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
For multifamily rental properties that are existing affordable housing consisting of not less than five units, a local government has a right of first refusal to make a matched offer for the purchase of such property, subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. Existing affordable housing is housing that is subject to one or more restricted use covenants or similar recorded agreements to ensure affordability consistent with affordable housing financial assistance requirements. The act requires the seller of such property to give notice to the local government and to the Colorado housing and finance authority at least 2 years before the final expiration of the last remaining affordability restriction on the property of the date of such expiration, a second notice not less than 6 months before the final expiration of the last remaining affordability restriction, and additional notice when the seller takes certain actions as a precursor to selling the property. Sharing information provided by the seller in certain notices is subject to execution of a nondisclosure agreement. Upon receiving the third notice indicating an intent to sell the property or of a potential sale of the property, the local government has 14 calendar days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 30 calendar days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 60 calendar days of the acceptance of the local government's offer; except that, if the seller has received an entirely cash offer from a third-party buyer, then the local government must agree to close within the same time period as is set forth in the third-party buyer's offer. If the price as listed in the seller's notice is reduced by 5% or more or if the required terms and conditions of an acceptable offer that has been communicated to the local government materially change, the seller must provide notice of the change within 7 days and the local government may exercise or re-exercise its right of first refusal.
Prime sponsorship of HB23-1190: Affordable Housing Right Of First Refusal. Official enacted-bill summary: The right to the purchase of the property by the local government is effective on and after August 7, 2023 until August 1, 2028, is subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing, and, if the property is mixed-use, applies only to the residential portion of the property. The local government may assign its right of first refusal to a housing authority that is within the local government's jurisdiction, to a regional housing authority, or to the Colorado housing and finance authority subject to the limitation that the assignee make the same commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. The act requires notices to be given by the seller to the local government and by the local government to the seller and to residents of the property. Upon receiving notice of intent to sell or of a potential sale of property, the local government has 7 calendar days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 30 calendar days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 60 calendar days if practicable but within not more than 90 calendar days of the execution of an agreement for the sale and purchase of the qualifying property; except that there are certain circumstances that may allow these periods to be tolled. Prior to the sale of a property, the seller is required to execute and record an affidavit in the real property records of the county in which the property is located certifying that either the rights and property interests of the local government have expired or been released or waived or that the local government or its assignee is the purchaser of the property. The act allows certain sales of property to be exempt from the right of first refusal and the requirements established by the act for the right of first refusal.
2023-06-06: Governor Vetoed. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The right to the purchase of the property by the local government is effective on and after August 7, 2023 until August 1, 2028, is subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing, and, if the property is mixed-use, applies only to the residential portion of the property. The local government may assign its right of first refusal to a housing authority that is within the local government's jurisdiction, to a regional housing authority, or to the Colorado housing and finance authority subject to the limitation that the assignee make the same commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. The act requires notices to be given by the seller to the local government and by the local government to the seller and to residents of the property. Upon receiving notice of intent to sell or of a potential sale of property, the local government has 7 calendar days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 30 calendar days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 60 calendar days if practicable but within not more than 90 calendar days of the execution of an agreement for the sale and purchase of the qualifying property; except that there are certain circumstances that may allow these periods to be tolled. Prior to the sale of a property, the seller is required to execute and record an affidavit in the real property records of the county in which the property is located certifying that either the rights and property interests of the local government have expired or been released or waived or that the local government or its assignee is the purchaser of the property. The act allows certain sales of property to be exempt from the right of first refusal and the requirements established by the act for the right of first refusal.
Colorado House of Representatives, District 27 · D–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Brianna TitoneColorado Legislature · HB19-1228
Increase Tax Credit Allocation Affordable Housing
May 17, 2019 · Enacted
Rep. Brianna Titone · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB19-1228: Increase Tax Credit Allocation Affordable Housing. Official enacted-bill summary: Income tax - affordable housing tax credit - increase in aggregate amount of tax credits that may be allocated annually. Currently, under the affordable housing tax credit, during each calendar year of the period beginning in 2015 and ending in 2024 the Colorado housing and finance authority (CHFA) may allocate tax credits in an aggregate amount up to $5 million annually. The act increases the annual aggregate cap to $10 million for the years beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2024. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2019-05-17: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Income tax - affordable housing tax credit - increase in aggregate amount of tax credits that may be allocated annually. Currently, under the affordable housing tax credit, during each calendar year of the period beginning in 2015 and ending in 2024 the Colorado housing and finance authority (CHFA) may allocate tax credits in an aggregate amount up to $5 million annually. The act increases the annual aggregate cap to $10 million for the years beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2024. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
U.S. House of Representatives, Colorado District 7 · D–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Brittany PettersenColorado Legislature · SB21-242
Housing Development Grants Hotels Tenancy Support Program
Jun 25, 2021 · Enacted
Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored / Rep. Brittany Pettersen · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Woodrow · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of SB21-242: Housing Development Grants Hotels Tenancy Support Program. Official enacted-bill summary: The act allows the division of housing within the department of local affairs to use the housing development grant fund for rental assistance, tenancy support service programs, and awarding grants and loans for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties to provide noncongregate sheltering or affordable housing for people experiencing homelessness. The act expands those who are eligible to benefit from the rental assistance and tenancy support programs to include individuals experiencing homelessness. The act transfers $30 million from the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund to the housing development grant fund for the funding of rental assistance and tenancy support programs related to the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties, and the awarding of grants and loans for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties. The act also transfers $15 million from the general fund to the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund. Additionally, the act requires the department of local affairs, during its annual report to the assigned committee of reference, to report on the rental and tenancy support service programs provided by the division of housing related to the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties and the grants and loans awarded by the division for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties. Finally, the act further expands the permissible use of the housing development grant fund to allow the awarding of grants to nonprofit organizations for the issuance of direct assistance to individuals who are currently experiencing financial need and are not eligible for certain other types of assistance.
2021-06-25: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act allows the division of housing within the department of local affairs to use the housing development grant fund for rental assistance, tenancy support service programs, and awarding grants and loans for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties to provide noncongregate sheltering or affordable housing for people experiencing homelessness. The act expands those who are eligible to benefit from the rental assistance and tenancy support programs to include individuals experiencing homelessness. The act transfers $30 million from the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund to the housing development grant fund for the funding of rental assistance and tenancy support programs related to the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties, and the awarding of grants and loans for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties. The act also transfers $15 million from the general fund to the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund. Additionally, the act requires the department of local affairs, during its annual report to the assigned committee of reference, to report on the rental and tenancy support service programs provided by the division of housing related to the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties and the grants and loans awarded by the division for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties. Finally, the act further expands the permissible use of the housing development grant fund to allow the awarding of grants to nonprofit organizations for the issuance of direct assistance to individuals who are currently experiencing financial need and are not eligible for certain other types of assistance.
Colorado House of Representatives, District 4 · D–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Cecelia EspenozaColorado Legislature · HB25-1168
Housing Protections for Victim-Survivors
May 22, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. Mandy Lindsay · Sponsored / Rep. Cecelia Espenoza · Sponsored / Sen. Mike Weissman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB25-1168: Housing Protections for Victim-Survivors. Official enacted-bill summary: As it relates to unlawful detention of real property, the act expands current exceptions and protections for tenants who are victims of domestic violence and domestic abuse to include victims of unlawful sexual behavior and stalking (victim-survivor). If domestic violence or domestic abuse was the cause of an alleged unlawful detention of real property, current law requires the tenant to document the domestic violence or domestic abuse through a police report or a valid civil or emergency protection order (required documentation). The act expands the required documentation to include a valid criminal protection order, a self-attestation affidavit or a letter signed by a qualified third party from whom the tenant sought assistance. If a tenant has been alleged to have committed unlawful detention of real property due to nonpayment or late payment of rent and the tenant has provided the landlord with the required documentation, the act requires the landlord to offer the tenant a repayment plan no later than 3 business days after serving a demand for unpaid rent or no later than 3 business days after receiving the required documentation. Within 7 days after receipt of the repayment plan, the act requires the tenant to accept the landlord's repayment plan or propose an alternative. If a landlord has written or actual notice that a tenant is a victim-survivor, the act requires the landlord to make all reasonable efforts to perfect service through personal service to the tenant. The act requires the court to suppress, or continue suppressing, any related court records upon receiving the victim-survivor's motion or petition to suppress the record, the required documentation, and an assertion that public access to the records poses a risk to the defendant's safety or the safety of a family member of the defendant's household. The act makes changes to certain court procedures as the procedures relate to victim-survivors.
2025-05-22: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
As it relates to unlawful detention of real property, the act expands current exceptions and protections for tenants who are victims of domestic violence and domestic abuse to include victims of unlawful sexual behavior and stalking (victim-survivor). If domestic violence or domestic abuse was the cause of an alleged unlawful detention of real property, current law requires the tenant to document the domestic violence or domestic abuse through a police report or a valid civil or emergency protection order (required documentation). The act expands the required documentation to include a valid criminal protection order, a self-attestation affidavit or a letter signed by a qualified third party from whom the tenant sought assistance. If a tenant has been alleged to have committed unlawful detention of real property due to nonpayment or late payment of rent and the tenant has provided the landlord with the required documentation, the act requires the landlord to offer the tenant a repayment plan no later than 3 business days after serving a demand for unpaid rent or no later than 3 business days after receiving the required documentation. Within 7 days after receipt of the repayment plan, the act requires the tenant to accept the landlord's repayment plan or propose an alternative. If a landlord has written or actual notice that a tenant is a victim-survivor, the act requires the landlord to make all reasonable efforts to perfect service through personal service to the tenant. The act requires the court to suppress, or continue suppressing, any related court records upon receiving the victim-survivor's motion or petition to suppress the record, the required documentation, and an assertion that public access to the records poses a risk to the defendant's safety or the safety of a family member of the defendant's household. The act makes changes to certain court procedures as the procedures relate to victim-survivors.
Only current Colorado officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Colorado statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Colorado snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Colorado, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.