Colorado · individual fact

Colorado housing and borrowing

Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.

Median owner-occupied home value$539.4K2020–2024 · #5 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.76K2020–2024 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate66.2%2020–2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first

Colorado over time

Explore Colorado readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Colorado officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Colorado effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Colorado change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Home-price growth since 2016 Colorado · source units
ColoradoPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Home-price growth since 20162025: +83.1%-10.4%+43.3%+97%Colorado, 2016: +0%Colorado, 2017: +8.2%Colorado, 2018: +17.1%Colorado, 2019: +23.5%Colorado, 2020: +29.8%Colorado, 2021: +49.5%Colorado, 2022: +75.1%Colorado, 2023: +80%Colorado, 2024: +86.6%Colorado, 2025: +83.1%201620202025
✦ Major events & context · 28National context · Housing downturn and the Great Recession · 2007-12-01Great RecessionNational context · Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorships announced · 2008-09-07Mortgage conservatorshipNational context · Federal Reserve announces agency mortgage-bond purchases · 2008-11-25Mortgage-bond purchasesNational context · Making Home Affordable modification guidelines released · 2009-03-04Mortgage relief guidelinesNational context · Federal Reserve announces another round of mortgage-bond purchases · 2012-09-13Further mortgage supportNational context · Federal Reserve announces slower bond purchases · 2013-12-18Bond purchases slowNational context · Ability-to-Repay mortgage standards take effect · 2014-01-10Mortgage lending standardsNational context · Federal Reserve raises its target above the near-zero range · 2015-12-16Rates leave near zeroNational context · Pandemic shock and emergency mortgage-market support · 2020-03-15COVID-19 / Fed responseNational context · CARES Act introduces mortgage and renter protections · 2020-03-27CARES housing reliefNational context · CDC eviction moratorium takes effect · 2020-09-04CDC eviction protectionsNational context · Treasury launches Emergency Rental Assistance · 2021-01-05Rental assistance launchesNational context · American Rescue Plan funds additional housing assistance · 2021-03-11Additional housing reliefNational context · Supreme Court blocks the renewed CDC eviction moratorium · 2021-08-26CDC moratorium blockedNational context · Federal Reserve begins the 2022 rate-increase cycle · 2022-03-16Rate increases beginNational context · Federal Reserve begins reducing its securities holdings · 2022-06-01Fed holdings begin shrinkingNational context · Freddie Mac changes mortgage-rate measurement · 2022-11-17Mortgage survey updateNational context · Average 30-year mortgage rate reaches 7.79% · 2023-10-26Mortgage rates reach 7.79%National context · Federal Reserve lowers its policy-rate target · 2024-09-18Policy-rate cutNational context · Federal Reserve ends the reduction of total securities holdings · 2025-12-01Fed runoff endsNational context · Federal Reserve cuts its target to 3.50–3.75% · 2025-12-10Further policy-rate cutNational context · Executive order targets federal support for institutional home purchases · 2026-01-20Institutional-buyer orderNational context · Executive order directs review of home-construction barriers · 2026-03-13Home-construction reviewNational context · Executive order directs review of mortgage-credit rules · 2026-03-13Mortgage-credit reviewColorado · Colorado approves housing powers and tax-credit changes · 2026-03-25Colorado housing tax creditsColorado · Colorado directs a housing-fund transfer to the general fund · 2026-05-28Colorado housing-fund transferNational context · 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becomes law · 2026-07-11ROAD housing lawNational context · Federal Reserve holds its target at 3.50–3.75% · 2026-07-29Policy rate held steady● Colorado Legislature · 7032232224222● U.S. Congress · Colorado delegation · 4◆ Governor · 773223224222■ Colorado agencies · 222007-12-012026-09-30

173 of 173 reviewed Colorado actions match · 144 date markers shown. 28 major events shown separately.

Colorado · 2025: +83.1% · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Colorado Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
PeriodColoradoRankU.S. benchmark
2025+83.1%#28 of 50Not available
2024+86.6%#16 of 50Not available
2023+80%#13 of 50Not available
2022+75.1%#10 of 50Not available
2021+49.5%#9 of 50Not available
2020+29.8%#7 of 50Not available
2019+23.5%#5 of 50Not available
2018+17.1%#5 of 50Not available
2017+8.2%#5 of 50Not available
2016+0%#1 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Colorado · state comparison

Home values, rent, and homeownership

Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.

Colorado · 2020–2024$539,400
Colorado rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median owner-occupied home value

Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.

2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · $539,4002020–2024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$839,100—
#2California$734,700—
#3Washington$564,600—
#4Massachusetts$562,100—
#5Colorado · your comparison$539,400—
#6Utah$489,400—
#7Oregon$477,600—
#8New Jersey$454,400—
#9Nevada$435,400—
#10New York$423,800—
#11Maryland$419,900—
#12Idaho$418,600—
#13Rhode Island$404,200—
#14New Hampshire$402,500—
#15Arizona$394,500—
#16Virginia$383,700—
#17Montana$375,800—
#18Connecticut$366,900—
#19Florida$359,000—
#20Alaska$352,900—
#21Delaware$352,000—
#22Minnesota$329,300—
#23Vermont$316,600—
#24Wyoming$309,700—
#25Georgia$303,300—
#26Maine$296,600—
#27North Carolina$288,900—
#28Tennessee$286,700—
#29Texas$283,800—
#30Wisconsin$266,500—
#31Illinois$263,300—
#32South Carolina$259,000—
#33South Dakota$257,400—
#34Pennsylvania$254,500—
#35North Dakota$249,900—
#36New Mexico$248,100—
#37Nebraska$238,600—
#38Michigan$231,600—
#39Missouri$230,300—
#40Indiana$218,200—
#41Kansas$217,200—
#42Louisiana$216,500—
#43Ohio$214,800—
#44Alabama$209,900—
#45Iowa$208,000—
#46Kentucky$205,600—
#47Oklahoma$199,800—
#48Arkansas$188,000—
#49Mississippi$169,800—
#50West Virginia$162,600—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median gross rent

$1,761/month2020–2024 estimate

Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.

  • This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
  • The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Colorado · state comparison

How much income goes toward housing?

Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.

Colorado · 2020–202452.9%
Colorado rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Renters · spending at least 30% of income

Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.

Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · 52.9%2020–2024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Florida60.1%—
#2Hawaii56.7%—
#3Nevada55.9%—
#4California55.3%—
#5Louisiana54.8%—
#6Colorado · your comparison52.9%—
#7Connecticut52.6%—
#8Oregon52.5%—
#9Georgia52.4%—
#10South Carolina52.1%—
#11New York52.1%—
#12Massachusetts51.8%—
#13Texas51.7%—
#14New Jersey51.6%—
#15Maryland51.5%—
#16Arizona51.4%—
#17Mississippi51.3%—
#18Michigan50.4%—
#19New Mexico50.2%—
#20Washington49.9%—
#21Delaware49.6%—
#22North Carolina48.9%—
#23West Virginia48.9%—
#24Tennessee48.8%—
#25Alabama48.8%—
#26Virginia48.5%—
#27Maine48.4%—
#28Vermont48.4%—
#29New Hampshire48.2%—
#30Pennsylvania48.2%—
#31Minnesota48.1%—
#32Indiana48.1%—
#33Rhode Island48%—
#34Illinois47.9%—
#35Utah47.2%—
#36Idaho46.9%—
#37Oklahoma46.3%—
#38Ohio45.9%—
#39Missouri45.6%—
#40Kentucky45.4%—
#41Nebraska45.1%—
#42Arkansas44.8%—
#43Montana44.8%—
#44Alaska44.6%—
#45Iowa43.9%—
#46Wisconsin43.7%—
#47Kansas43.5%—
#48Wyoming43.1%—
#49South Dakota39.8%—
#50North Dakota38.9%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Colorado · state comparison

Home prices versus income growth

Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.

Colorado · 2025+83.1%
Colorado rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Home-price growth since 2016

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.

This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Colorado
Home-price growth since 2016 history in Colorado-13%+43.3%+99.6%20162025
2025 · Colorado: +83.1% · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Colorado Home-price growth since 2016 history
PeriodColoradoCompare
2016+0%
2017+8.2%
2018+17.1%
2019+23.5%
2020+29.8%
2021+49.5%
2022+75.1%
2023+80%
2024+86.6%
2025+83.1%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · +83.1%2025 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Idaho+141.7%—
#2Florida+114.5%—
#3Maine+113.7%—
#4Utah+113.6%—
#5Tennessee+112.4%—
#6Arizona+112.3%—
#7New Hampshire+110.1%—
#8Rhode Island+108%—
#9Georgia+107.6%—
#10North Carolina+107.1%—
#11Montana+106.7%—
#12Nevada+106.1%—
#13South Carolina+105.5%—
#14Washington+100.2%—
#15Indiana+94.5%—
#16Wisconsin+94%—
#17Michigan+93.7%—
#18Ohio+93.3%—
#19Vermont+92.6%—
#20New Jersey+88.9%—
#21Missouri+86.9%—
#22New York+85.9%—
#23Nebraska+84.6%—
#24Massachusetts+84.3%—
#24South Dakota+84.3%—
#26Texas+83.3%—
#27Kentucky+83.2%—
#28Colorado · your comparison+83.1%—
#29Kansas+82.5%—
#30New Mexico+82.3%—
#31Alabama+81.3%—
#32Arkansas+80.8%—
#33Connecticut+79.8%—
#34Pennsylvania+78.4%—
#35Virginia+76.5%—
#36Delaware+75.4%—
#37Oregon+74.7%—
#38California+72.7%—
#39Oklahoma+71.9%—
#40Minnesota+70%—
#41Wyoming+69.3%—
#42Illinois+65.3%—
#43Iowa+64.2%—
#44Mississippi+63.9%—
#45Hawaii+63%—
#46Maryland+59.4%—
#47West Virginia+58.6%—
#48Alaska+51.9%—
#49North Dakota+45.9%—
#50Louisiana+38.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Colorado · state comparison

Construction, availability, and borrowing

State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.

Colorado · 202533,754
Colorado rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total housing units authorized

New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.

A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · 33,7542025 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas210,217—
#2Florida178,297—
#3California103,856—
#4North Carolina86,167—
#5Georgia61,196—
#6Arizona51,532—
#7South Carolina45,862—
#8Tennessee43,374—
#9New York38,667—
#10Washington34,913—
#11Colorado · your comparison33,754—
#12Ohio33,640—
#13Virginia33,094—
#14Indiana29,076—
#15New Jersey27,661—
#16Utah26,775—
#17Pennsylvania25,709—
#18Wisconsin25,569—
#19Michigan23,075—
#20Minnesota20,947—
#21Alabama19,061—
#22Illinois18,551—
#23Nevada18,540—
#24Idaho17,944—
#25Missouri17,474—
#26Oklahoma15,513—
#27Arkansas15,492—
#28Kentucky14,940—
#29Oregon14,839—
#30Louisiana14,203—
#31Iowa13,664—
#32Maryland13,358—
#33Massachusetts12,477—
#34Nebraska10,596—
#35Kansas10,299—
#36Mississippi8,405—
#37New Mexico7,747—
#38Connecticut7,273—
#39Maine6,979—
#40Delaware6,468—
#41South Dakota5,305—
#42Montana5,258—
#43New Hampshire5,030—
#44West Virginia3,962—
#45Hawaii3,708—
#46North Dakota2,440—
#47Vermont2,294—
#48Wyoming2,238—
#49Rhode Island1,738—
#50Alaska848—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Colorado candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

23 statements from 13 candidates

2026 Colorado Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Michael J. Allen

2 statements

Republican · Attorney General · CO

Housing & homeownership

Colorado families are being squeezed from every direction. The cost of housing, groceries, insurance, utilities, and other necessities continue to rise, while government makes taxpayers pay more so government spending can continue to rise. Michael believes government has a responsibility to live wit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Saving Taxpayer Dollars

Candidate campaign source

Colorado families are being squeezed from every direction. The cost of housing, groceries, insurance, utilities, and other necessities continue to rise, while government makes taxpayers pay more so government spending can continue to rise. Michael believes government has a responsibility to live within its means and deliver real results for the people who pay the bills.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Michael J. Allen campaign source ↗
View 1 more statement from Michael J. Allen
Housing & homeownership

Fighting crime is also an important part of protecting Colorado families from rising costs. Every stolen vehicle, burglarized home, and shoplifted business creates real financial costs. Motor vehicle theft contributes to insurance losses and rising premiums. Property crime creates costs for homeowne…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Saving Taxpayer Dollars

Candidate campaign source

Fighting crime is also an important part of protecting Colorado families from rising costs. Every stolen vehicle, burglarized home, and shoplifted business creates real financial costs. Motor vehicle theft contributes to insurance losses and rising premiums. Property crime creates costs for homeowners and insurers. Retail theft forces businesses to spend more on security and absorb lost inventory, and those costs are ultimately passed on to the consumer.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Michael J. Allen campaign source ↗

2026 Colorado Governor / Lt. Governor — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 9 statements

Greg Lopez

1 statement

Unaffiliated · Governor / Lt. Governor · CO

Housing & homeownership

As Governor, I will prioritize veteran mental health services, workforce opportunities, housing support, and improved coordination between state agencies and veteran organizations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, I will prioritize veteran mental health services, workforce opportunities, housing support, and improved coordination between state agencies and veteran organizations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Greg Lopez — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Phil Weiser

3 statements

Democratic · Governor / Lt. Governor · CO

Housing & homeownership

Invest in: Our workforce, expanding job training, apprenticeships, and career pathways aligned with employer and worker needs. Housing, childcare and health care, helping workers live near their jobs. Infrastructure, improving transportation, broadband, and public safety. Our land, air and water, ke…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Invest in: Our workforce, expanding job training, apprenticeships, and career pathways aligned with employer and worker needs. Housing, childcare and health care, helping workers live near their jobs. Infrastructure, improving transportation, broadband, and public safety. Our land, air and water, keeping our communities safe and thriving.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Phil Weiser — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
View 2 more statements from Phil Weiser
Housing & homeownership

Protect renters from unfair practices and keep affordable units available.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Protect renters from unfair practices and keep affordable units available.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Phil Weiser — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Housing & homeownership

Support wildfire prevention with local & tribal partners from clearing beetle-kill trees to lowering insurance costs for homeowners who mitigate risk.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Support wildfire prevention with local & tribal partners from clearing beetle-kill trees to lowering insurance costs for homeowners who mitigate risk.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Phil Weiser — candidate-owned primary source 14 ↗

Victor Marx

4 statements

Republican · Governor / Lt. Governor · CO

Housing & homeownership

As Governor, I will require every state or local agency proposing a new fee or fee increase to undergo a full TABOR compliance review under C.R.S. § 24-77-102 to determine whether the charge is actually a tax that requires voter approval. Agencies will be required to publicly disclose the purpose of…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, I will require every state or local agency proposing a new fee or fee increase to undergo a full TABOR compliance review under C.R.S. § 24-77-102 to determine whether the charge is actually a tax that requires voter approval. Agencies will be required to publicly disclose the purpose of each fee, projected revenue, and the specific programs that will receive the funds before implementation. This policy defends the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (Colo. Const. art. X, § 20) and prevents government from using disguised revenue mechanisms that drive up the cost of homeownership, utilities, and essential services. My administration will close loopholes that circumvent voter oversight.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 3 more statements from Victor Marx
Housing & homeownership

My administration will direct the Division of Insurance, under C.R.S. § 10-1-108, to conduct market analyses, restrict excessive rate practices, and create competitive reinsurance mechanisms to stabilize homeowner premiums. Colorado must attract new insurers into the market, reduce regulatory bottle…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

My administration will direct the Division of Insurance, under C.R.S. § 10-1-108, to conduct market analyses, restrict excessive rate practices, and create competitive reinsurance mechanisms to stabilize homeowner premiums. Colorado must attract new insurers into the market, reduce regulatory bottlenecks, and expand risk-pooling programs—especially in rural and wildfire-prone regions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Housing & homeownership

No veteran who served this country should be left without a home. My administration will make veteran homelessness a priority and work to ensure every veteran has a stable place to live.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

No veteran who served this country should be left without a home. My administration will make veteran homelessness a priority and work to ensure every veteran has a stable place to live.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Housing & homeownership

If elected Governor, I will urge all municipalities to adopt expedited permitting standards for residential construction under C.R.S. § 29-20-201. Local governments will be required to approve or deny complete applications within clear statutory timeframes. I will direct the Department of Local Affa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

If elected Governor, I will urge all municipalities to adopt expedited permitting standards for residential construction under C.R.S. § 29-20-201. Local governments will be required to approve or deny complete applications within clear statutory timeframes. I will direct the Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) to develop model permitting frameworks and provide technical assistance to streamline zoning reviews, environmental clearances, and utility coordination. This reform reflects the State’s responsibility to promote the “general welfare” under Colo. Const. art. II, § 3. By accelerating housing development while maintaining essential safety requirements, my administration will lower construction costs, increase supply, and help stabilize home prices across Colorado.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Colorado State Treasurer — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Jeff Bridges

1 statement

Democratic · State Treasurer · CO

Housing & homeownership

• Housing that working people can actually afford • Infrastructure that creates good-paying jobs and a strong economy • Clean energy that lowers your bills and fights global warming

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Investing in Our Future

Candidate campaign source

• Housing that working people can actually afford • Infrastructure that creates good-paying jobs and a strong economy • Clean energy that lowers your bills and fights global warming

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Jeff Bridges campaign source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Colorado candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Colorado incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Colorado legislators and Colorado’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Colorado’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

177 matching sponsorships or proposals · 57 Colorado incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Alex Valdez

Colorado House of Representatives, District 5 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Alex Valdez
Colorado Legislature · HB23-1068

Pet Animal Ownership In Housing

Jun 7, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Alex Valdez · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB23-1068: Pet Animal Ownership In Housing. Official enacted-bill summary: For purposes of these provisions, a dwelling includes a dwelling unit that is a structure or part of a structure that is used as a home, residence, or sleeping place by a tenant. The act also requires that an officer executing a writ of restitution inspect the premises for pet animals and give any pet animal found to the tenant of the premises if the tenant is present at the time the writ is executed. If a tenant is not present, the officer must contact a local authority in charge of animal control to take custody of any pet animal. The landlord shall provide the local animal control authority with access to the premises to allow the pet animals to be removed or secured and with the name and contact information for the tenant and shall leave contact information for the tenant as to where the pet animal has been taken by posting notice in a visible place at the premises. The act provides that no pet animal shall be removed from the premises during the execution of a writ and left unattended on public or private property. The act also limits the amount of an additional security deposit a landlord can receive from a prospective or current tenant as a condition of permitting the tenant's pet animal to reside at the residential premises to a refundable $300. Additionally, a landlord is prohibited from demanding or receiving additional rent from a tenant as a condition of permitting the tenant's pet animal to reside at the residential premises in an amount that exceeds $35 per month or 1.5% per month of the tenant's monthly rent, whichever is greater. The act also excludes pet animals from the categories of a tenant's personal property that a person who rents furnished or unfurnished rooms or apartments may place a lien on for unpaid board, lodging, or rent. APPROVED by Governor June 7, 2023 EFFECTIVE January 1, 2024 NOTE: This act was passed without a safety clause. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2023-06-07: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

For purposes of these provisions, a dwelling includes a dwelling unit that is a structure or part of a structure that is used as a home, residence, or sleeping place by a tenant. The act also requires that an officer executing a writ of restitution inspect the premises for pet animals and give any pet animal found to the tenant of the premises if the tenant is present at the time the writ is executed. If a tenant is not present, the officer must contact a local authority in charge of animal control to take custody of any pet animal. The landlord shall provide the local animal control authority with access to the premises to allow the pet animals to be removed or secured and with the name and contact information for the tenant and shall leave contact information for the tenant as to where the pet animal has been taken by posting notice in a visible place at the premises. The act provides that no pet animal shall be removed from the premises during the execution of a writ and left unattended on public or private property. The act also limits the amount of an additional security deposit a landlord can receive from a prospective or current tenant as a condition of permitting the tenant's pet animal to reside at the residential premises to a refundable $300. Additionally, a landlord is prohibited from demanding or receiving additional rent from a tenant as a condition of permitting the tenant's pet animal to reside at the residential premises in an amount that exceeds $35 per month or 1.5% per month of the tenant's monthly rent, whichever is greater. The act also excludes pet animals from the categories of a tenant's personal property that a person who rents furnished or unfurnished rooms or apartments may place a lien on for unpaid board, lodging, or rent. APPROVED by Governor June 7, 2023 EFFECTIVE January 1, 2024 NOTE: This act was passed without a safety clause. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Amy Paschal

Colorado House of Representatives, District 18 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Amy Paschal
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1284

Requirements for Tenant Utility Billing

Mar 18, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Jacque Phillips · Sponsored / Rep. Amy Paschal · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1284: Requirements for Tenant Utility Billing. Official proposal summary: The bill establishes requirements for landlords, unit owners, and associations governing common interest communities (association) for billing a tenant for utility service. A landlord, a unit owner, or an association may individually bill a tenant using a submeter or bill a tenant through a ratio utility billing system, which is a system that allocates utility service costs among individual tenants based on a unit's square footage, occupancy, or other physical characteristics. Starting on January 1, 2027, all new residential construction must install individual submeters for each individual unit to measure water consumption for each unit. A tenant's utility bill for water utility service must be calculated based on the individual submeter reading. For existing residential properties and other types of utility service other than water service, the landlord, unit owner, or association may use a ratio utility billing system if they meet certain requirements. A landlord, a unit owner, or an association shall disclose to a tenant in the tenant's rental agreement the method by which the tenant's utility bills will be calculated. If a landlord, a unit owner, or an association uses a ratio utility billing system, they must deduct at least 10% of the total utility service bill before allocating individual costs to tenants in order to account for utility service to common areas of a residential premises. If a landlord, a unit owner, or an association is found in violation of the provisions of the bill, the aggrieved tenant may file a civil action in court and, if the tenant prevails, recover actual damages from utility bill overages, additional damages in an amount not to exceed 25% of the utility bill overages, and any attorney fees or court costs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)

2026-03-18: House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Postpone Indefinitely. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The bill establishes requirements for landlords, unit owners, and associations governing common interest communities (association) for billing a tenant for utility service. A landlord, a unit owner, or an association may individually bill a tenant using a submeter or bill a tenant through a ratio utility billing system, which is a system that allocates utility service costs among individual tenants based on a unit's square footage, occupancy, or other physical characteristics. Starting on January 1, 2027, all new residential construction must install individual submeters for each individual unit to measure water consumption for each unit. A tenant's utility bill for water utility service must be calculated based on the individual submeter reading. For existing residential properties and other types of utility service other than water service, the landlord, unit owner, or association may use a ratio utility billing system if they meet certain requirements. A landlord, a unit owner, or an association shall disclose to a tenant in the tenant's rental agreement the method by which the tenant's utility bills will be calculated. If a landlord, a unit owner, or an association uses a ratio utility billing system, they must deduct at least 10% of the total utility service bill before allocating individual costs to tenants in order to account for utility service to common areas of a residential premises. If a landlord, a unit owner, or an association is found in violation of the provisions of the bill, the aggrieved tenant may file a civil action in court and, if the tenant prevails, recover actual damages from utility bill overages, additional damages in an amount not to exceed 25% of the utility bill overages, and any attorney fees or court costs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Andrew Boesenecker

Colorado House of Representatives, District 53 · D–CO

5 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Andrew Boesenecker
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1313

Adjust Requirements Statewide Affordable Housing Fund

May 26, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Rebekah Stewart · Sponsored / Sen. Matt Ball · Sponsored / Sen. Lisa Frizell · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1313: Adjust Requirements Statewide Affordable Housing Fund. Official enacted-bill summary: Current law requires a local government or a tribal government desiring to receive funding from the statewide affordable housing fund to have filed with the division of housing of the department of local affairs (division) a commitment specifying how, within a 3-year cycle, affordable housing units within the local or tribal government's territorial boundaries will be increased by 3% each year over the baseline number of affordable housing units (baseline number). The baseline number resets every 3 years for the next cycle. To be eligible for funding from the statewide affordable housing fund, a local or tribal government is required to file a commitment with the division and achieve the 3% increase over the baseline number each year during the 3-year cycle. The act changes the requirements for the 3-year cycle beginning on January 1, 2027, and each 3-year cycle thereafter. A local government desiring to receive funding from the statewide affordable housing fund is no longer required to increase affordable housing units by 3% above the baseline each year, but is instead required to meet the target increase number of affordable housing units (target increase number).

2026-05-26: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Current law requires a local government or a tribal government desiring to receive funding from the statewide affordable housing fund to have filed with the division of housing of the department of local affairs (division) a commitment specifying how, within a 3-year cycle, affordable housing units within the local or tribal government's territorial boundaries will be increased by 3% each year over the baseline number of affordable housing units (baseline number). The baseline number resets every 3 years for the next cycle. To be eligible for funding from the statewide affordable housing fund, a local or tribal government is required to file a commitment with the division and achieve the 3% increase over the baseline number each year during the 3-year cycle. The act changes the requirements for the 3-year cycle beginning on January 1, 2027, and each 3-year cycle thereafter. A local government desiring to receive funding from the statewide affordable housing fund is no longer required to increase affordable housing units by 3% above the baseline each year, but is instead required to meet the target increase number of affordable housing units (target increase number).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1001

Housing Developments on Qualifying Properties

Mar 25, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Javier Mabrey · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored / Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1001: Housing Developments on Qualifying Properties. Official enacted-bill summary: A qualifying property is real property that contains no more than 5 acres of land and is owned by: A school district; A state college or university; A board of cooperative services; A housing authority; A local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties; A nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; or A nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property. If a subject jurisdiction requests, as part of an initial development application, that a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing provide documentation that the nonprofit meets required criteria, the nonprofit organization shall provide the documentation. A subject jurisdiction is not required to allow a residential development on a qualifying property if the subject jurisdiction implements a transferable development rights program on the qualifying property and if the transferable development rights program includes a policy for affordable resident housing that is restricted in ownership and occupancy in perpetuity.

2026-03-25: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

A qualifying property is real property that contains no more than 5 acres of land and is owned by: A school district; A state college or university; A board of cooperative services; A housing authority; A local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties; A nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; or A nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property. If a subject jurisdiction requests, as part of an initial development application, that a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing provide documentation that the nonprofit meets required criteria, the nonprofit organization shall provide the documentation. A subject jurisdiction is not required to allow a residential development on a qualifying property if the subject jurisdiction implements a transferable development rights program on the qualifying property and if the transferable development rights program includes a policy for affordable resident housing that is restricted in ownership and occupancy in perpetuity.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · SB26-001

Workforce Housing & Housing Tax Credit

Mar 25, 2026 · Enacted

Sen. Dylan Roberts · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Richardson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of SB26-001: Workforce Housing & Housing Tax Credit. Official enacted-bill summary: The act allows a board of county commissioners and the governing body of a municipality to sell and dispose of property owned by the county or municipality, as applicable, to provide for affordable housing and allows a municipality to enter into a long-term rental or lease agreement for the development of affordable housing. The act allows for the approval of a mutijurisdictional housing authority at a biennial local election instead of only during a general election or an election held on the first Tuesday in November of an odd-numbered year. The ballot question about establishing the authority may be combined with a question about a tax, impact fee, multiple-fiscal year debt, or other financial obligation. The act allows a board of county commissioners to use ad valorem tax revenue for housing authorities, housing programs, and workforce housing. The act entitles an entity subject to income tax to which a middle-income housing tax credit is transferred by a governmental entity or quasi-governmental entity to claim the credit without owning an interest in a qualified project. The sale and use of construction materials by contractors is exempt from taxation if the materials are used by the state in its governmental capacity only. The act provides that 'governmental capacity' includes the construction of workforce housing projects undertaken by counties. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2026-03-25: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act allows a board of county commissioners and the governing body of a municipality to sell and dispose of property owned by the county or municipality, as applicable, to provide for affordable housing and allows a municipality to enter into a long-term rental or lease agreement for the development of affordable housing. The act allows for the approval of a mutijurisdictional housing authority at a biennial local election instead of only during a general election or an election held on the first Tuesday in November of an odd-numbered year. The ballot question about establishing the authority may be combined with a question about a tax, impact fee, multiple-fiscal year debt, or other financial obligation. The act allows a board of county commissioners to use ad valorem tax revenue for housing authorities, housing programs, and workforce housing. The act entitles an entity subject to income tax to which a middle-income housing tax credit is transferred by a governmental entity or quasi-governmental entity to claim the credit without owning an interest in a qualified project. The sale and use of construction materials by contractors is exempt from taxation if the materials are used by the state in its governmental capacity only. The act provides that 'governmental capacity' includes the construction of workforce housing projects undertaken by counties. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · HB24-1175

Local Goverments Rights to Property for Affordable Housing

May 30, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Emily Sirota · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB24-1175: Local Goverments Rights to Property for Affordable Housing. Official enacted-bill summary: For multifamily rental properties that are existing affordable housing consisting of not less than five units, a local government has a right of first refusal to make a matched offer for the purchase of such property, subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. Existing affordable housing is housing that is subject to one or more restricted use covenants or similar recorded agreements to ensure affordability consistent with affordable housing financial assistance requirements. The act requires the seller of such property to give notice to the local government and to the Colorado housing and finance authority at least 2 years before the final expiration of the last remaining affordability restriction on the property of the date of such expiration, a second notice not less than 6 months before the final expiration of the last remaining affordability restriction, and additional notice when the seller takes certain actions as a precursor to selling the property. Sharing information provided by the seller in certain notices is subject to execution of a nondisclosure agreement. Upon receiving the third notice indicating an intent to sell the property or of a potential sale of the property, the local government has 14 calendar days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 30 calendar days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 60 calendar days of the acceptance of the local government's offer; except that, if the seller has received an entirely cash offer from a third-party buyer, then the local government must agree to close within the same time period as is set forth in the third-party buyer's offer. If the price as listed in the seller's notice is reduced by 5% or more or if the required terms and conditions of an acceptable offer that has been communicated to the local government materially change, the seller must provide notice of the change within 7 days and the local government may exercise or re-exercise its right of first refusal.

2024-05-30: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

For multifamily rental properties that are existing affordable housing consisting of not less than five units, a local government has a right of first refusal to make a matched offer for the purchase of such property, subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. Existing affordable housing is housing that is subject to one or more restricted use covenants or similar recorded agreements to ensure affordability consistent with affordable housing financial assistance requirements. The act requires the seller of such property to give notice to the local government and to the Colorado housing and finance authority at least 2 years before the final expiration of the last remaining affordability restriction on the property of the date of such expiration, a second notice not less than 6 months before the final expiration of the last remaining affordability restriction, and additional notice when the seller takes certain actions as a precursor to selling the property. Sharing information provided by the seller in certain notices is subject to execution of a nondisclosure agreement. Upon receiving the third notice indicating an intent to sell the property or of a potential sale of the property, the local government has 14 calendar days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 30 calendar days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 60 calendar days of the acceptance of the local government's offer; except that, if the seller has received an entirely cash offer from a third-party buyer, then the local government must agree to close within the same time period as is set forth in the third-party buyer's offer. If the price as listed in the seller's notice is reduced by 5% or more or if the required terms and conditions of an acceptable offer that has been communicated to the local government materially change, the seller must provide notice of the change within 7 days and the local government may exercise or re-exercise its right of first refusal.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · HB23-1190

Affordable Housing Right Of First Refusal

Jun 6, 2023 · Vetoed

Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Emily Sirota · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB23-1190: Affordable Housing Right Of First Refusal. Official enacted-bill summary: The right to the purchase of the property by the local government is effective on and after August 7, 2023 until August 1, 2028, is subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing, and, if the property is mixed-use, applies only to the residential portion of the property. The local government may assign its right of first refusal to a housing authority that is within the local government's jurisdiction, to a regional housing authority, or to the Colorado housing and finance authority subject to the limitation that the assignee make the same commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. The act requires notices to be given by the seller to the local government and by the local government to the seller and to residents of the property. Upon receiving notice of intent to sell or of a potential sale of property, the local government has 7 calendar days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 30 calendar days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 60 calendar days if practicable but within not more than 90 calendar days of the execution of an agreement for the sale and purchase of the qualifying property; except that there are certain circumstances that may allow these periods to be tolled. Prior to the sale of a property, the seller is required to execute and record an affidavit in the real property records of the county in which the property is located certifying that either the rights and property interests of the local government have expired or been released or waived or that the local government or its assignee is the purchaser of the property. The act allows certain sales of property to be exempt from the right of first refusal and the requirements established by the act for the right of first refusal.

2023-06-06: Governor Vetoed. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The right to the purchase of the property by the local government is effective on and after August 7, 2023 until August 1, 2028, is subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing, and, if the property is mixed-use, applies only to the residential portion of the property. The local government may assign its right of first refusal to a housing authority that is within the local government's jurisdiction, to a regional housing authority, or to the Colorado housing and finance authority subject to the limitation that the assignee make the same commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. The act requires notices to be given by the seller to the local government and by the local government to the seller and to residents of the property. Upon receiving notice of intent to sell or of a potential sale of property, the local government has 7 calendar days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 30 calendar days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 60 calendar days if practicable but within not more than 90 calendar days of the execution of an agreement for the sale and purchase of the qualifying property; except that there are certain circumstances that may allow these periods to be tolled. Prior to the sale of a property, the seller is required to execute and record an affidavit in the real property records of the county in which the property is located certifying that either the rights and property interests of the local government have expired or been released or waived or that the local government or its assignee is the purchaser of the property. The act allows certain sales of property to be exempt from the right of first refusal and the requirements established by the act for the right of first refusal.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brianna Titone

Colorado House of Representatives, District 27 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brianna Titone
Colorado Legislature · HB19-1228

Increase Tax Credit Allocation Affordable Housing

May 17, 2019 · Enacted

Rep. Brianna Titone · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB19-1228: Increase Tax Credit Allocation Affordable Housing. Official enacted-bill summary: Income tax - affordable housing tax credit - increase in aggregate amount of tax credits that may be allocated annually. Currently, under the affordable housing tax credit, during each calendar year of the period beginning in 2015 and ending in 2024 the Colorado housing and finance authority (CHFA) may allocate tax credits in an aggregate amount up to $5 million annually. The act increases the annual aggregate cap to $10 million for the years beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2024. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2019-05-17: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Income tax - affordable housing tax credit - increase in aggregate amount of tax credits that may be allocated annually. Currently, under the affordable housing tax credit, during each calendar year of the period beginning in 2015 and ending in 2024 the Colorado housing and finance authority (CHFA) may allocate tax credits in an aggregate amount up to $5 million annually. The act increases the annual aggregate cap to $10 million for the years beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2024. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brittany Pettersen

U.S. House of Representatives, Colorado District 7 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brittany Pettersen
Colorado Legislature · SB21-242

Housing Development Grants Hotels Tenancy Support Program

Jun 25, 2021 · Enacted

Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored / Rep. Brittany Pettersen · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Woodrow · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of SB21-242: Housing Development Grants Hotels Tenancy Support Program. Official enacted-bill summary: The act allows the division of housing within the department of local affairs to use the housing development grant fund for rental assistance, tenancy support service programs, and awarding grants and loans for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties to provide noncongregate sheltering or affordable housing for people experiencing homelessness. The act expands those who are eligible to benefit from the rental assistance and tenancy support programs to include individuals experiencing homelessness. The act transfers $30 million from the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund to the housing development grant fund for the funding of rental assistance and tenancy support programs related to the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties, and the awarding of grants and loans for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties. The act also transfers $15 million from the general fund to the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund. Additionally, the act requires the department of local affairs, during its annual report to the assigned committee of reference, to report on the rental and tenancy support service programs provided by the division of housing related to the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties and the grants and loans awarded by the division for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties. Finally, the act further expands the permissible use of the housing development grant fund to allow the awarding of grants to nonprofit organizations for the issuance of direct assistance to individuals who are currently experiencing financial need and are not eligible for certain other types of assistance.

2021-06-25: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act allows the division of housing within the department of local affairs to use the housing development grant fund for rental assistance, tenancy support service programs, and awarding grants and loans for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties to provide noncongregate sheltering or affordable housing for people experiencing homelessness. The act expands those who are eligible to benefit from the rental assistance and tenancy support programs to include individuals experiencing homelessness. The act transfers $30 million from the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund to the housing development grant fund for the funding of rental assistance and tenancy support programs related to the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties, and the awarding of grants and loans for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties. The act also transfers $15 million from the general fund to the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund. Additionally, the act requires the department of local affairs, during its annual report to the assigned committee of reference, to report on the rental and tenancy support service programs provided by the division of housing related to the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties and the grants and loans awarded by the division for the rental, acquisition, or renovation of underutilized hotels, underutilized motels, and other underutilized properties. Finally, the act further expands the permissible use of the housing development grant fund to allow the awarding of grants to nonprofit organizations for the issuance of direct assistance to individuals who are currently experiencing financial need and are not eligible for certain other types of assistance.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Cecelia Espenoza

Colorado House of Representatives, District 4 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Cecelia Espenoza
Colorado Legislature · HB25-1168

Housing Protections for Victim-Survivors

May 22, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Mandy Lindsay · Sponsored / Rep. Cecelia Espenoza · Sponsored / Sen. Mike Weissman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB25-1168: Housing Protections for Victim-Survivors. Official enacted-bill summary: As it relates to unlawful detention of real property, the act expands current exceptions and protections for tenants who are victims of domestic violence and domestic abuse to include victims of unlawful sexual behavior and stalking (victim-survivor). If domestic violence or domestic abuse was the cause of an alleged unlawful detention of real property, current law requires the tenant to document the domestic violence or domestic abuse through a police report or a valid civil or emergency protection order (required documentation). The act expands the required documentation to include a valid criminal protection order, a self-attestation affidavit or a letter signed by a qualified third party from whom the tenant sought assistance. If a tenant has been alleged to have committed unlawful detention of real property due to nonpayment or late payment of rent and the tenant has provided the landlord with the required documentation, the act requires the landlord to offer the tenant a repayment plan no later than 3 business days after serving a demand for unpaid rent or no later than 3 business days after receiving the required documentation. Within 7 days after receipt of the repayment plan, the act requires the tenant to accept the landlord's repayment plan or propose an alternative. If a landlord has written or actual notice that a tenant is a victim-survivor, the act requires the landlord to make all reasonable efforts to perfect service through personal service to the tenant. The act requires the court to suppress, or continue suppressing, any related court records upon receiving the victim-survivor's motion or petition to suppress the record, the required documentation, and an assertion that public access to the records poses a risk to the defendant's safety or the safety of a family member of the defendant's household. The act makes changes to certain court procedures as the procedures relate to victim-survivors.

2025-05-22: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

As it relates to unlawful detention of real property, the act expands current exceptions and protections for tenants who are victims of domestic violence and domestic abuse to include victims of unlawful sexual behavior and stalking (victim-survivor). If domestic violence or domestic abuse was the cause of an alleged unlawful detention of real property, current law requires the tenant to document the domestic violence or domestic abuse through a police report or a valid civil or emergency protection order (required documentation). The act expands the required documentation to include a valid criminal protection order, a self-attestation affidavit or a letter signed by a qualified third party from whom the tenant sought assistance. If a tenant has been alleged to have committed unlawful detention of real property due to nonpayment or late payment of rent and the tenant has provided the landlord with the required documentation, the act requires the landlord to offer the tenant a repayment plan no later than 3 business days after serving a demand for unpaid rent or no later than 3 business days after receiving the required documentation. Within 7 days after receipt of the repayment plan, the act requires the tenant to accept the landlord's repayment plan or propose an alternative. If a landlord has written or actual notice that a tenant is a victim-survivor, the act requires the landlord to make all reasonable efforts to perfect service through personal service to the tenant. The act requires the court to suppress, or continue suppressing, any related court records upon receiving the victim-survivor's motion or petition to suppress the record, the required documentation, and an assertion that public access to the records poses a risk to the defendant's safety or the safety of a family member of the defendant's household. The act makes changes to certain court procedures as the procedures relate to victim-survivors.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Colorado officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Colorado statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.