Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages7.9%2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 659.3%2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6575%2024 · #13 of 50 · highest first
Colorado over time
Explore Colorado readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Colorado officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Colorado effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Colorado change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages Colorado · source units
ColoradoPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
221 of 221 reviewed Colorado actions match · 167 date markers shown. 22 major events shown separately.
Colorado · 2024: 7.9% · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Colorado · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
Colorado · 20247.9%
Colorado rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Colorado
2024 · Colorado: 7.9% · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Colorado Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
Colorado
Compare
2014
10.3%
2015
8.1%
2016
7.5%
2017
7.5%
2018
7.5%
2019
8%
2020
Not available
2021
8%
2022
7.1%
2023
6.7%
2024
7.9%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 7.9%2024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado · your comparison
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio
6.7%
—
#32
Washington
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
People enrolled in Health First Colorado, the state's Medicaid program. The same official update separately reports enrollment in Child Health Plan Plus.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Related program enrollment
Child Health Plan Plus
75,103
Method and limitations
Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing administrative enrollment reporting.
Enrollment is not the same as the uninsured population and can change monthly.
Enrollment alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or prescription-drug prices.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Colorado with every state.
Colorado · 2020$8,583
Colorado rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Colorado
2020 · Colorado: $8,583 · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Colorado Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
Colorado
Compare
2014
$6,680
2015
$7,075
2016
$7,323
2017
$7,615
2018
$7,998
2019
$8,286
2020
$8,583
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · $8,5832020 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado · your comparison
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
Colorado · 202278.5 years
Colorado rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Colorado population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Colorado
2022 · Colorado: 78.5 years · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Colorado Life expectancy at birth history
Period
Colorado
Compare
2018
80 years
2019
80 years
2020
78.3 years
2021
77.7 years
2022
78.5 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 78.5 years2022 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado · your comparison
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
Colorado · 20238%
Colorado rank#45among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Colorado
2023 · Colorado: 8% · Rank #45 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Colorado Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
Colorado
Compare
2019
6.6%
2020
7.1%
2021
6.5%
2022
7.6%
2023
8%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 8%2023 · Rank #45 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 7.3% – 8.7%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Mississippi
15.1%
95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1
West Virginia
15.1%
95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3
Louisiana
14.6%
95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4
Alabama
14%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5
Arkansas
13.1%
95% CI: 12–14.3
#6
South Carolina
12.7%
95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6
Tennessee
12.7%
95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8
Texas
12.1%
95% CI: 11–13.3
#9
Indiana
11.7%
95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10
Georgia
11.5%
95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10
Ohio
11.5%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12
Oklahoma
11.3%
95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13
Delaware
11.1%
95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14
North Carolina
11%
95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15
Illinois
10.9%
95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15
Maryland
10.9%
95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15
Michigan
10.9%
95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18
Nevada
10.8%
95% CI: 8.9–13
#18
New Mexico
10.8%
95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20
Missouri
10.7%
95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20
South Dakota
10.7%
95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22
California
10.6%
95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23
Kansas
10.5%
95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24
Virginia
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25
Florida
10.1%
95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26
Rhode Island
10%
95% CI: 9.1–11
#27
Arizona
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27
Iowa
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29
Nebraska
9.7%
95% CI: 9–10.3
#30
Wisconsin
9.6%
95% CI: 9–10.2
#31
Hawaii
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31
New York
9.5%
95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31
Oregon
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34
Wyoming
9.4%
95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35
Minnesota
9.3%
95% CI: 8.6–10
#36
New Jersey
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37
Maine
9%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
North Dakota
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39
Idaho
8.7%
95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40
Washington
8.6%
95% CI: 8.2–9
#41
Massachusetts
8.5%
95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42
Connecticut
8.4%
95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43
Alaska
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44
Utah
8.1%
95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45
Colorado · your comparison
8%
95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46
Montana
7.9%
95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46
New Hampshire
7.9%
95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48
Vermont
7.8%
95% CI: 7–8.7
—
Kentucky
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Pennsylvania
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
Colorado · June 30, 202647.5%
Colorado rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 47.5%June 30, 2026 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado · your comparison
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
Colorado · 2020$7,206
Colorado rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · $7,2062020 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado · your comparison
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
Colorado · 2023–202426.4%
Colorado rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 26.4%2023–2024 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado · your comparison
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
221 of 221 reviewed Colorado actions · newest first
Jun 29, 2026 · AG 2026-06-29 · Attorney General Phil Weiser sues Trump administration for unlawful implementation of Medicaid work requirements for medically frail individuals · Reported actionColorado agencies · AG 2026-06-29
Attorney General Phil Weiser sues Trump administration for unlawful implementation of Medicaid work requirements for medically frail individuals
Jun 29, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Phil Weiser · Filed lawsuit
FactVote reviewed summary
Challenged the implementation of Medicaid work-requirement exemptions for medically frail people, seeking to protect eligibility and continuous coverage.
Reported in the official release dated 2026-06-29. The release date may follow a filing or court order. Litigation, guidance and proposed settlements do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
The fact counts Health First Colorado enrollees, with Child Health Plan Plus reported separately. Eligibility, enrollment and renewal rules concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a change in enrollment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Medicaid and Child Health Plan Plus enrollment. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
June 29, 2026 (DENVER) – As part of a coalition of 24 attorneys general and two governors, Attorney General Phil Weiser today announced a lawsuit over the Trump administration’s unlawful implementation of new Medicaid work requirements included in the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Congress created exemptions from Medicaid’s work requirements to ensure that people with serious illnesses and disabilities do not lose coverage or face interruptions in care. Despite months of working with states on implementation, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services surprised states with an interim final rule on June 3, 2026, which adopted a new interpretation of key terms like “medically frail” and makes it harder for medically vulnerable individuals to be excused from the work requirements. While the work requirement provision begins January 1, 2027, states must notify Medicaid recipients about these changes by August 31, 2026, and need significant lead time to prepare those communications. The states cannot wait for CMS to address the deficiencies through the ongoing rulemaking process. As a result, the attorneys general are seeking to block implementation of the interim final rule’s illegal provisions and to have them ultimately struck down. “States had already made substantial investments relying on the plain language of the law and CMS’s prior guidance and now face the risk of harsh financial penalties for noncompliance with the Medicaid work requirements interim final rule,” said Attorney General Weiser. “The interim final rule creates administrative burdens and unnecessary red tape that put eligible people at risk of losing their health coverage — including those who are already working or qualify for an exemption. We’re filing this lawsuit to make sure Coloradans who rely on Medicaid get the health care they need.” Past Medicaid work requirement programs have shown that added red tape causes eligible people to lose coverage, placing greater strain on state Medicaid programs, safety net providers, and emergency rooms, while increasing costs as more medically frail residents become uninsured.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 4, 2026 · HB26-1276 · Signed HB26-1276: Protect Safety of Individuals Who Are Immigrants · SignedGovernor · HB26-1276
Signed HB26-1276: Protect Safety of Individuals Who Are Immigrants
Jun 4, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Jared Polis · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Signed HB26-1276: Protect Safety of Individuals Who Are Immigrants. The act exempts Colorado courts' e-filing system from the requirement that users certify that they will not disclose personal identifying information obtained from the system for federal immigration enforcement. The act authorizes a public health agency to inspect or examine a facility that houses or detains individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings. Under current law, the department of public health and environment is authorized to inspect facilities that house or detain individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings. The act expands the inspection authority, including the frequency of inspections and things that are subject to inspection. A facility that refuses to allow the inspection is subject to a civil penalty. The department of public health and environment is authorized to set fees for inspections and deposit the money from the fees in the immigration facility inspection and detention cash fund, which is created in the state treasury. The act authorizes the department of public health and environment to require facilities that house or detain individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings to comply with requirements, including health and safety standards and reporting requirements. A facility that fails to comply is subject to a civil penalty. The act requires the department of public health and environment to submit an annual report to the attorney general concerning facilities' compliance with these new requirements and make the report publicly available on its website. The act requires the P.O.S.T. board to establish training standards related to peace officer compliance with current laws concerning civil immigration detainers. P.O.S.T.-certified peace officers must complete the training before December 31, 2027. The act requires the attorney general to develop and make publicly available a policy regarding current laws concerning the protection of personal identifying information. The act appropriates $107,283 to the department of public health and environment from the immigration facility inspection and detention cash fund.
2026-06-04: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability. This records the governor’s dated action; signing is separate from implementation.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act exempts Colorado courts' e-filing system from the requirement that users certify that they will not disclose personal identifying information obtained from the system for federal immigration enforcement. The act authorizes a public health agency to inspect or examine a facility that houses or detains individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings. Under current law, the department of public health and environment is authorized to inspect facilities that house or detain individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings. The act expands the inspection authority, including the frequency of inspections and things that are subject to inspection. A facility that refuses to allow the inspection is subject to a civil penalty. The department of public health and environment is authorized to set fees for inspections and deposit the money from the fees in the immigration facility inspection and detention cash fund, which is created in the state treasury. The act authorizes the department of public health and environment to require facilities that house or detain individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings to comply with requirements, including health and safety standards and reporting requirements. A facility that fails to comply is subject to a civil penalty. The act requires the department of public health and environment to submit an annual report to the attorney general concerning facilities' compliance with these new requirements and make the report publicly available on its website. The act requires the P.O.S.T. board to establish training standards related to peace officer compliance with current laws concerning civil immigration detainers. P.O.S.T.-certified peace officers must complete the training before December 31, 2027. The act requires the attorney general to develop and make publicly available a policy regarding current laws concerning the protection of personal identifying information. The act appropriates $107,283 to the department of public health and environment from the immigration facility inspection and detention cash fund.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 4, 2026 · HB26-1276 · Protect Safety of Individuals Who Are Immigrants · EnactedColorado Legislature · HB26-1276
Protect Safety of Individuals Who Are Immigrants
Jun 4, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Elizabeth Velasco · Sponsored / Rep. Lorena Garcia · Sponsored / Sen. Iman Jodeh · Sponsored / Sen. Mike Weissman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1276: Protect Safety of Individuals Who Are Immigrants. Official enacted-bill summary: The act exempts Colorado courts' e-filing system from the requirement that users certify that they will not disclose personal identifying information obtained from the system for federal immigration enforcement. The act authorizes a public health agency to inspect or examine a facility that houses or detains individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings. Under current law, the department of public health and environment is authorized to inspect facilities that house or detain individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings. The act expands the inspection authority, including the frequency of inspections and things that are subject to inspection. A facility that refuses to allow the inspection is subject to a civil penalty. The department of public health and environment is authorized to set fees for inspections and deposit the money from the fees in the immigration facility inspection and detention cash fund, which is created in the state treasury. The act authorizes the department of public health and environment to require facilities that house or detain individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings to comply with requirements, including health and safety standards and reporting requirements. A facility that fails to comply is subject to a civil penalty. The act requires the department of public health and environment to submit an annual report to the attorney general concerning facilities' compliance with these new requirements and make the report publicly available on its website. The act requires the P.O.S.T. board to establish training standards related to peace officer compliance with current laws concerning civil immigration detainers. P.O.S.T.-certified peace officers must complete the training before December 31, 2027. The act requires the attorney general to develop and make publicly available a policy regarding current laws concerning the protection of personal identifying information. The act appropriates $107,283 to the department of public health and environment from the immigration facility inspection and detention cash fund.
2026-06-04: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act exempts Colorado courts' e-filing system from the requirement that users certify that they will not disclose personal identifying information obtained from the system for federal immigration enforcement. The act authorizes a public health agency to inspect or examine a facility that houses or detains individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings. Under current law, the department of public health and environment is authorized to inspect facilities that house or detain individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings. The act expands the inspection authority, including the frequency of inspections and things that are subject to inspection. A facility that refuses to allow the inspection is subject to a civil penalty. The department of public health and environment is authorized to set fees for inspections and deposit the money from the fees in the immigration facility inspection and detention cash fund, which is created in the state treasury. The act authorizes the department of public health and environment to require facilities that house or detain individuals who are noncitizens for purposes of civil immigration proceedings to comply with requirements, including health and safety standards and reporting requirements. A facility that fails to comply is subject to a civil penalty. The act requires the department of public health and environment to submit an annual report to the attorney general concerning facilities' compliance with these new requirements and make the report publicly available on its website. The act requires the P.O.S.T. board to establish training standards related to peace officer compliance with current laws concerning civil immigration detainers. P.O.S.T.-certified peace officers must complete the training before December 31, 2027. The act requires the attorney general to develop and make publicly available a policy regarding current laws concerning the protection of personal identifying information. The act appropriates $107,283 to the department of public health and environment from the immigration facility inspection and detention cash fund.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 4, 2026 · HB26-1226 · Manage Emissions from Electric Generating Units · EnactedColorado Legislature · HB26-1226
Manage Emissions from Electric Generating Units
Jun 4, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Jenny Willford · Sponsored / Rep. Meg Froelich · Sponsored / Sen. Mike Weissman · Sponsored / Sen. Lisa Cutter · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1226: Manage Emissions from Electric Generating Units. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires the division of administration in the department of public health and environment (division), no later than July 2029, to propose a final rule (rule) establishing certain limits on the emission of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide (emission limits) from an electric generating unit (unit) that is owned or operated by an electric utility; is located in the state; and emitted 200 tons or more of nitrogen oxides, or sulfur dioxide, or both in calendar year 2024 (covered unit). The rule must require compliance with the emission limits as soon as practicable after December 31, 2034, and must not cover units that, before December 31, 2029, have ceased operations; burn natural gas, fuel oil, or both only; or have certain systems installed. A unit that operates after December 31, 2034, must install certain pollution controls and comply with the emission limits on or before December 31, 2034. An owner or operator of a unit is required to provide quarterly emission reports showing compliance with the rule to the division. On August 1, 2029, the air quality control commission in the department of public health and environment (AQCC) must submit to the general assembly a list of any units that are subject to a federal order. If there are any units subject to a federal order, the AQCC must also submit to the general assembly recommendations on whether to amend the requirements for units subject to federal order. An investor-owned utility or wholesale electric cooperative that is the owner or operator of a unit is required, beginning 150 days after the issuance of a federal order requiring the unit to remain operating after the unit was scheduled to retire (order) and continuing every 90 days until the order is no longer in effect, to file a report with the public utilities commission (commission) that contains certain information about the costs to operate the unit and the amount of electricity generated by the unit. The commission must make these reports publicly available. An investor-owned utility is also permitted to submit an application for a financing order to recover the costs of complying with an order.
2026-06-04: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is gas-fired electricity-industry net generation divided by total in-state generation covered by EIA Table 5. The denominator excludes estimated small-scale generation outside that table. Gas-fired plants or other in-state generation resources concern this mix; procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from an operating plant or measured output. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act requires the division of administration in the department of public health and environment (division), no later than July 2029, to propose a final rule (rule) establishing certain limits on the emission of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide (emission limits) from an electric generating unit (unit) that is owned or operated by an electric utility; is located in the state; and emitted 200 tons or more of nitrogen oxides, or sulfur dioxide, or both in calendar year 2024 (covered unit). The rule must require compliance with the emission limits as soon as practicable after December 31, 2034, and must not cover units that, before December 31, 2029, have ceased operations; burn natural gas, fuel oil, or both only; or have certain systems installed. A unit that operates after December 31, 2034, must install certain pollution controls and comply with the emission limits on or before December 31, 2034. An owner or operator of a unit is required to provide quarterly emission reports showing compliance with the rule to the division. On August 1, 2029, the air quality control commission in the department of public health and environment (AQCC) must submit to the general assembly a list of any units that are subject to a federal order. If there are any units subject to a federal order, the AQCC must also submit to the general assembly recommendations on whether to amend the requirements for units subject to federal order. An investor-owned utility or wholesale electric cooperative that is the owner or operator of a unit is required, beginning 150 days after the issuance of a federal order requiring the unit to remain operating after the unit was scheduled to retire (order) and continuing every 90 days until the order is no longer in effect, to file a report with the public utilities commission (commission) that contains certain information about the costs to operate the unit and the amount of electricity generated by the unit. The commission must make these reports publicly available. An investor-owned utility is also permitted to submit an application for a financing order to recover the costs of complying with an order.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 4, 2026 · HB26-1226 · Signed HB26-1226: Manage Emissions from Electric Generating Units · SignedGovernor · HB26-1226
Signed HB26-1226: Manage Emissions from Electric Generating Units
Jun 4, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Jared Polis · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Signed HB26-1226: Manage Emissions from Electric Generating Units. The act requires the division of administration in the department of public health and environment (division), no later than July 2029, to propose a final rule (rule) establishing certain limits on the emission of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide (emission limits) from an electric generating unit (unit) that is owned or operated by an electric utility; is located in the state; and emitted 200 tons or more of nitrogen oxides, or sulfur dioxide, or both in calendar year 2024 (covered unit). The rule must require compliance with the emission limits as soon as practicable after December 31, 2034, and must not cover units that, before December 31, 2029, have ceased operations; burn natural gas, fuel oil, or both only; or have certain systems installed. A unit that operates after December 31, 2034, must install certain pollution controls and comply with the emission limits on or before December 31, 2034. An owner or operator of a unit is required to provide quarterly emission reports showing compliance with the rule to the division. On August 1, 2029, the air quality control commission in the department of public health and environment (AQCC) must submit to the general assembly a list of any units that are subject to a federal order. If there are any units subject to a federal order, the AQCC must also submit to the general assembly recommendations on whether to amend the requirements for units subject to federal order. An investor-owned utility or wholesale electric cooperative that is the owner or operator of a unit is required, beginning 150 days after the issuance of a federal order requiring the unit to remain operating after the unit was scheduled to retire (order) and continuing every 90 days until the order is no longer in effect, to file a report with the public utilities commission (commission) that contains certain information about the costs to operate the unit and the amount of electricity generated by the unit. The commission must make these reports publicly available. An investor-owned utility is also permitted to submit an application for a financing order to recover the costs of complying with an order.
2026-06-04: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability. This records the governor’s dated action; signing is separate from implementation.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is gas-fired electricity-industry net generation divided by total in-state generation covered by EIA Table 5. The denominator excludes estimated small-scale generation outside that table. Gas-fired plants or other in-state generation resources concern this mix; procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from an operating plant or measured output. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act requires the division of administration in the department of public health and environment (division), no later than July 2029, to propose a final rule (rule) establishing certain limits on the emission of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide (emission limits) from an electric generating unit (unit) that is owned or operated by an electric utility; is located in the state; and emitted 200 tons or more of nitrogen oxides, or sulfur dioxide, or both in calendar year 2024 (covered unit). The rule must require compliance with the emission limits as soon as practicable after December 31, 2034, and must not cover units that, before December 31, 2029, have ceased operations; burn natural gas, fuel oil, or both only; or have certain systems installed. A unit that operates after December 31, 2034, must install certain pollution controls and comply with the emission limits on or before December 31, 2034. An owner or operator of a unit is required to provide quarterly emission reports showing compliance with the rule to the division. On August 1, 2029, the air quality control commission in the department of public health and environment (AQCC) must submit to the general assembly a list of any units that are subject to a federal order. If there are any units subject to a federal order, the AQCC must also submit to the general assembly recommendations on whether to amend the requirements for units subject to federal order. An investor-owned utility or wholesale electric cooperative that is the owner or operator of a unit is required, beginning 150 days after the issuance of a federal order requiring the unit to remain operating after the unit was scheduled to retire (order) and continuing every 90 days until the order is no longer in effect, to file a report with the public utilities commission (commission) that contains certain information about the costs to operate the unit and the amount of electricity generated by the unit. The commission must make these reports publicly available. An investor-owned utility is also permitted to submit an application for a financing order to recover the costs of complying with an order.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 3, 2026 · AG 2026-06-03 · Attorney General Weiser announces new suicide and violence prevention trainings for families, community members, and educators · Reported actionColorado agencies · AG 2026-06-03
Attorney General Weiser announces new suicide and violence prevention trainings for families, community members, and educators
Jun 3, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Phil Weiser · Launched training
FactVote reviewed summary
Launched free training on identifying suicide and violence risks and using extreme risk protection orders to restrict firearm access when a person poses a danger.
Reported in the official release dated 2026-06-03. The release date may follow a filing or court order. Litigation, guidance and proposed settlements do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths · Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
June 3, 2026 (DENVER) — Attorney General Phil Weiser today announced new free, virtual trainings designed to help Colorado families, community members, and educators recognize warning signs of suicide and violence and better understand prevention tools, including Colorado’s Extreme Risk Protection Order law. The trainings are being launched as Colorado continues to face one of the nation’s highest suicide rates and ongoing challenges related to firearm violence. “Violence and suicide are often preventable when people know the warning signs and understand the tools available to help,” said Attorney General Weiser. “Whether it’s a parent concerned about a loved one, a community member worried about someone in crisis, or an educator supporting a student, these trainings provide practical information that can help save lives. By helping people recognize warning signs and take action early, we can help prevent acts of violence, support people in crisis, and build safer communities across Colorado.” New training for families and community members The Colorado Attorney General’s Office’s new ERPO training for family and community members is designed for people who may be in a position to recognize warning signs that someone is at risk of harming themselves or others. The training is particularly relevant for family and household members who are eligible to petition for an Extreme Risk Protection Order, or ERPO, under Colorado law and helps participants understand warning signs associated with suicide and firearm violence risk, when an ERPO may be appropriate, and how the ERPO process works. New training for educators The office is also launching a new teen dating violence prevention training for educators that helps school personnel recognize signs of teen dating violence, understand its impact on student safety and wellbeing, and identify appropriate intervention and support resources. The training builds upon the ERPO curriculum for educators released by the Colorado Attorney General’s Office in 2025.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Colorado officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Colorado candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
61 statements from 16 candidates
2026 Colorado Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
Defend Reproductive Freedom: Jena will protect Coloradans’ access to reproductive health care from attempts to restrict it. She will also protect abortion access in Colorado, and will stand against any attempt to prosecute women or doctors over reproductive healthcare.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care
Candidate campaign source
Defend Reproductive Freedom: Jena will protect Coloradans’ access to reproductive health care from attempts to restrict it. She will also protect abortion access in Colorado, and will stand against any attempt to prosecute women or doctors over reproductive healthcare.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Crime Prevention: As Attorney General, Jena will invest in programs that prevent crime before they happen, improve mental health, and reduce recidivism.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
Crime Prevention: As Attorney General, Jena will invest in programs that prevent crime before they happen, improve mental health, and reduce recidivism.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Fund tele-behavioral health permanently with broadband investments so a kid in Springfield, Colorado can see a licensed counselor without leaving their school.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Fund tele-behavioral health permanently with broadband investments so a kid in Springfield, Colorado can see a licensed counselor without leaving their school.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Build a Western Slope Behavioral Health Hospital — modeled after West Springs in Grand Junction but with significantly expanded inpatient and crisis-stabilization capacity — so kids in Mesa, Delta, Montrose, Garfield, and surrounding counties are not flown to Aurora or sent out of state.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Build a Western Slope Behavioral Health Hospital — modeled after West Springs in Grand Junction but with significantly expanded inpatient and crisis-stabilization capacity — so kids in Mesa, Delta, Montrose, Garfield, and surrounding counties are not flown to Aurora or sent out of state.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Children should be protected from exploitation, violence, dangerous drugs, online predators, and policies that place politics ahead of their well-being. I believe that we all care about our kids and it is because of that belief that the First Lady and I will refocus the State on protecting the innoc…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Children should be protected from exploitation, violence, dangerous drugs, online predators, and policies that place politics ahead of their well-being. I believe that we all care about our kids and it is because of that belief that the First Lady and I will refocus the State on protecting the innocence, safety, mental health, and future opportunities of children.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I will prioritize veteran mental health services, workforce opportunities, housing support, and improved coordination between state agencies and veteran organizations.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will prioritize veteran mental health services, workforce opportunities, housing support, and improved coordination between state agencies and veteran organizations.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Many rural hospitals in Colorado are struggling to survive under growing financial pressure, workforce shortages, regulatory burdens, and reimbursement challenges. The closure of rural healthcare facilities can devastate entire communities by reducing access to emergency care, maternity services, an…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Many rural hospitals in Colorado are struggling to survive under growing financial pressure, workforce shortages, regulatory burdens, and reimbursement challenges. The closure of rural healthcare facilities can devastate entire communities by reducing access to emergency care, maternity services, and basic healthcare I will not allow that to happen.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My administration will support stronger efforts to combat child exploitation and trafficking, improve youth mental health services, strengthen school safety, and encourage healthier childhood development. Colorado’s future depends on raising strong, healthy, and resilient young people who are prepar…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
My administration will support stronger efforts to combat child exploitation and trafficking, improve youth mental health services, strengthen school safety, and encourage healthier childhood development. Colorado’s future depends on raising strong, healthy, and resilient young people who are prepared to succeed in life.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I strongly believe every human life has value and deserves dignity, compassion, and respect. I will continue to support policies that protect life while also supporting mothers, families, adoption services, healthcare access, and community-based support systems that help women and children thrive.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care
Candidate campaign source
I strongly believe every human life has value and deserves dignity, compassion, and respect. I will continue to support policies that protect life while also supporting mothers, families, adoption services, healthcare access, and community-based support systems that help women and children thrive.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will reduce unnecessary regulations that drive up costs and make it harder for rural hospitals and clinics to remain operational. My administration will work with healthcare providers, local communities, and policymakers to improve sustainability, expand workforce recruitment, and preserve healthc…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
I will reduce unnecessary regulations that drive up costs and make it harder for rural hospitals and clinics to remain operational. My administration will work with healthcare providers, local communities, and policymakers to improve sustainability, expand workforce recruitment, and preserve healthcare access in rural Colorado.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Invest in co-responders—so addiction and mental health crises are met with compassion and treatment, and law enforcement officers are freed up for incidents that threaten public safety.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Invest in co-responders—so addiction and mental health crises are met with compassion and treatment, and law enforcement officers are freed up for incidents that threaten public safety.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Support recruitment and investment in police and sheriffs—we need to fund law enforcement, expand and modernize law enforcement training, and support mental health resources for officers and all first responders.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Support recruitment and investment in police and sheriffs—we need to fund law enforcement, expand and modernize law enforcement training, and support mental health resources for officers and all first responders.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Invest in: Our workforce, expanding job training, apprenticeships, and career pathways aligned with employer and worker needs. Housing, childcare and health care, helping workers live near their jobs. Infrastructure, improving transportation, broadband, and public safety. Our land, air and water, ke…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Invest in: Our workforce, expanding job training, apprenticeships, and career pathways aligned with employer and worker needs. Housing, childcare and health care, helping workers live near their jobs. Infrastructure, improving transportation, broadband, and public safety. Our land, air and water, keeping our communities safe and thriving.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Ensure every kid has at least one mentor and the support they need by: Creating a statewide mentorship program, called HOPE. Increasing access to in school mental health professionals and services, including in school screenings. Expanding mental health support through promotion of telehealth and pr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Ensure every kid has at least one mentor and the support they need by: Creating a statewide mentorship program, called HOPE. Increasing access to in school mental health professionals and services, including in school screenings. Expanding mental health support through promotion of telehealth and programs like I Matter.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Establish “Primary Care for All”, a systemwide mandate to move us from our current “sick care” system to a true “health care” system, focusing on value-based care tied to prevention and healthy outcomes, aligning physical, mental and behavioral health for “whole person” care, and launching “Hope”, o…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Establish “Primary Care for All”, a systemwide mandate to move us from our current “sick care” system to a true “health care” system, focusing on value-based care tied to prevention and healthy outcomes, aligning physical, mental and behavioral health for “whole person” care, and launching “Hope”, our youth mental health mentoring initiative.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I will work with the Colorado Department of Human Services and the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs under C.R.S. § 28-5-102 to expand access to long-term care, memory care, mental health treatment, and VA-partnered medical facilities. My administration will increase state sup…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will work with the Colorado Department of Human Services and the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs under C.R.S. § 28-5-102 to expand access to long-term care, memory care, mental health treatment, and VA-partnered medical facilities. My administration will increase state support for existing Veterans Community Living Centers and promote the development of satellite clinics in underserved rural regions.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will support legislation clarifying that individuals unlawfully present in the United States are not eligible for state-funded benefits except where required by federal law. This includes limiting access to taxpayer-funded programs under C.R.S. Title 26 (Human Services) and C.R.S. Title 25.5 (Heal…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy
Candidate campaign source
I will support legislation clarifying that individuals unlawfully present in the United States are not eligible for state-funded benefits except where required by federal law. This includes limiting access to taxpayer-funded programs under C.R.S. Title 26 (Human Services) and C.R.S. Title 25.5 (Health Care Policy & Financing).
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Affordable health care should be available to all Coloradans. Joe supports universal health care coverage and has championed efforts in Congress to lower the cost of prescription drugs, expand Medicare, and combat discriminatory practices of for-profit insurance companies. During the COVID-19 pandem…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Affordable health care should be available to all Coloradans. Joe supports universal health care coverage and has championed efforts in Congress to lower the cost of prescription drugs, expand Medicare, and combat discriminatory practices of for-profit insurance companies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, he successfully advocated for passage of legislation to increase access to COVID-19 testing, ramp up vaccine progress, and improve the U.S. medical supply stockpile. And inspired by a Broomfield third-grader, he introduced legislation to ensure fair and affordable access to specialized hearing devices to help his constituent and others like her.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Every Coloradan deserves to be treated equally, with respect and dignity. As a proud member of the Equality Caucus, Joe is working to ensure dignity and legal protection for LGBTQ+ Americans through passage of the Equality Act. And to combat racial injustice, Joe joined his colleagues in the Congres…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Civil rights and individual freedom
Candidate campaign source
Every Coloradan deserves to be treated equally, with respect and dignity. As a proud member of the Equality Caucus, Joe is working to ensure dignity and legal protection for LGBTQ+ Americans through passage of the Equality Act. And to combat racial injustice, Joe joined his colleagues in the Congressional Black Caucus to introduce and pass the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act. Joe is also a sponsor of the EACH Woman Act, which will ensure that woman can make their own healthcare decisions, and has supported efforts in Congress to end gender discrimination.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Protect Parental RightsSupport policies that ensure parents remain fully informed and involved in decisions regarding their children's education, healthcare, safety, and wellbeing.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Pro-FamilyPolicies.
Candidate campaign source
Protect Parental RightsSupport policies that ensure parents remain fully informed and involved in decisions regarding their children's education, healthcare, safety, and wellbeing.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Too often, national political debates on firearms become driven by fear, division, and political messaging instead of practical solutions that actually improve safety. Colorado deserves leadership willing to defend constitutional freedoms while supporting responsible ownership, mental health awarene…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Second AmendmentRights.
Candidate campaign source
Too often, national political debates on firearms become driven by fear, division, and political messaging instead of practical solutions that actually improve safety. Colorado deserves leadership willing to defend constitutional freedoms while supporting responsible ownership, mental health awareness, and effective enforcement of existing laws.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Support policies that ensure parents remain fully informed and involved in decisions regarding their children's education, healthcare, safety, and wellbeing.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Pro-FamilyPolicies.
Candidate campaign source
Support policies that ensure parents remain fully informed and involved in decisions regarding their children's education, healthcare, safety, and wellbeing.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Colorado candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Colorado incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Colorado legislators and Colorado’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Colorado’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
161 matching sponsorships or proposals · 61 Colorado incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Andrew Boesenecker
Colorado House of Representatives, District 53 · D–CO
5 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Andrew BoeseneckerColorado Legislature · HB26-1144
Rep. Lindsay Gilchrist · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Sen. Tom Sullivan · Sponsored / Sen. Katie Wallace · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1144: Prohibit Three-Dimensional Printing Firearms & Components. Official enacted-bill summary: The act prohibits knowingly manufacturing or producing a potentially functioning firearm, unfinished frame or receiver, large-capacity magazine, or rapid-fire device (firearm or firearm component) by 3-dimensional printing. The prohibition does not apply to a federally licensed firearm manufacturer, an instructor or student of an accredited gunsmithing program, or an institution that operates an accredited gunsmithing program. Unlawful 3-dimensional printing of a firearm or firearm component is a class 1 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 5 felony. The prohibitions in the act only apply to potentially functional firearms and firearm components. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2026-05-04: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act prohibits knowingly manufacturing or producing a potentially functioning firearm, unfinished frame or receiver, large-capacity magazine, or rapid-fire device (firearm or firearm component) by 3-dimensional printing. The prohibition does not apply to a federally licensed firearm manufacturer, an instructor or student of an accredited gunsmithing program, or an institution that operates an accredited gunsmithing program. Unlawful 3-dimensional printing of a firearm or firearm component is a class 1 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 5 felony. The prohibitions in the act only apply to potentially functional firearms and firearm components. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sen. Cathy Kipp · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Jamie Jackson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of SB25-034: Voluntary Do-Not-Sell Firearms Waiver. Official enacted-bill summary: The act establishes a process for a person to voluntarily waive the right to purchase a firearm (voluntary waiver). The Colorado bureau of investigation (bureau) in the department of public safety (department) shall deny a firearm transfer to the person while the voluntary waiver is in effect. The bureau shall develop an online portal (portal) for a person to electronically file for a voluntary waiver, update contact information, and revoke a voluntary waiver. The bureau is required to verify the filer's identity before accepting a voluntary waiver or revocation. The bureau shall enter a voluntary waiver into the national instant criminal background check system and any other federal or state computer-based systems used to identify prohibited purchasers of firearms. A person may revoke the voluntary waiver by filing for revocation with the bureau. The waiver remains in effect for 30 days after the bureau accepts the revocation. A person filing the voluntary waiver form may provide the name and contact information of a person who will be contacted if the person attempts to purchase a firearm while the voluntary waiver is in effect or if the filer revokes the voluntary waiver. The act prohibits a person from attempting to purchase a firearm while subject to a voluntary waiver. Attempting to purchase a firearm while subject to a voluntary waiver is a civil infraction, punishable by a maximum $25 fine. The voluntary waiver process and the prohibition on attempting to purchase a firearm while subject to a voluntary waiver are contingent on the department receiving $200,000 of gifts, grants, or donations to develop and operate the portal. The act permits the department to seek, accept, and expend gifts, grants, or donations for the portal. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2025-06-02: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act establishes a process for a person to voluntarily waive the right to purchase a firearm (voluntary waiver). The Colorado bureau of investigation (bureau) in the department of public safety (department) shall deny a firearm transfer to the person while the voluntary waiver is in effect. The bureau shall develop an online portal (portal) for a person to electronically file for a voluntary waiver, update contact information, and revoke a voluntary waiver. The bureau is required to verify the filer's identity before accepting a voluntary waiver or revocation. The bureau shall enter a voluntary waiver into the national instant criminal background check system and any other federal or state computer-based systems used to identify prohibited purchasers of firearms. A person may revoke the voluntary waiver by filing for revocation with the bureau. The waiver remains in effect for 30 days after the bureau accepts the revocation. A person filing the voluntary waiver form may provide the name and contact information of a person who will be contacted if the person attempts to purchase a firearm while the voluntary waiver is in effect or if the filer revokes the voluntary waiver. The act prohibits a person from attempting to purchase a firearm while subject to a voluntary waiver. Attempting to purchase a firearm while subject to a voluntary waiver is a civil infraction, punishable by a maximum $25 fine. The voluntary waiver process and the prohibition on attempting to purchase a firearm while subject to a voluntary waiver are contingent on the department receiving $200,000 of gifts, grants, or donations to develop and operate the portal. The act permits the department to seek, accept, and expend gifts, grants, or donations for the portal. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sen. Tom Sullivan · Sponsored / Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Meg Froelich · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of SB25-003: Semiautomatic Firearms & Rapid-Fire Devices. Official enacted-bill summary: The act defines a "specified semiautomatic firearm" as a semiautomatic rifle or semiautomatic shotgun with a detachable magazine or a gas-operated semiautomatic handgun with a detachable magazine. The act excludes certain types of firearms and specified models of firearms from the definition of "specified semiautomatic firearm". The act prohibits knowingly manufacturing, distributing, transferring, selling, or purchasing a specified semiautomatic firearm on or after August 1, 2026; except that a person may transfer a specified semiautomatic firearm to an individual residing in another state or a federally licensed firearm dealer. The act exempts certain manufacture, transfers, sales, and purchases from the prohibition, including specified transactions involving law enforcement agencies and peace officers, the department of corrections, armored vehicle businesses, military forces, gunsmiths, educational programs, and historical societies and museums; transfers that occur by operation of law or because of the death of a person; and conduct involving firearms for use solely as a prop for a film. Additionally, the prohibition does not apply to the transfer or sale of a specified semiautomatic firearm to, and receipt or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm by, a person who: Completed a hunter education course certified by the division of parks and wildlife (division) and, within 5 years before making the purchase, completed a basic firearms safety course; Within 5 years before making the purchase, completed an extended firearms safety course; or Completed an extended firearms safety course more than 5 years before making the purchase and completed a basic firearms safety course within 5 years before making the purchase. Unlawful manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm is a class 2 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 6 felony. The department of revenue shall revoke the state firearms dealer permit of a dealer who unlawfully manufactures, distributes, transfers, sells, or purchases a specified semiautomatic firearm.
2025-04-10: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act defines a "specified semiautomatic firearm" as a semiautomatic rifle or semiautomatic shotgun with a detachable magazine or a gas-operated semiautomatic handgun with a detachable magazine. The act excludes certain types of firearms and specified models of firearms from the definition of "specified semiautomatic firearm". The act prohibits knowingly manufacturing, distributing, transferring, selling, or purchasing a specified semiautomatic firearm on or after August 1, 2026; except that a person may transfer a specified semiautomatic firearm to an individual residing in another state or a federally licensed firearm dealer. The act exempts certain manufacture, transfers, sales, and purchases from the prohibition, including specified transactions involving law enforcement agencies and peace officers, the department of corrections, armored vehicle businesses, military forces, gunsmiths, educational programs, and historical societies and museums; transfers that occur by operation of law or because of the death of a person; and conduct involving firearms for use solely as a prop for a film. Additionally, the prohibition does not apply to the transfer or sale of a specified semiautomatic firearm to, and receipt or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm by, a person who: Completed a hunter education course certified by the division of parks and wildlife (division) and, within 5 years before making the purchase, completed a basic firearms safety course; Within 5 years before making the purchase, completed an extended firearms safety course; or Completed an extended firearms safety course more than 5 years before making the purchase and completed a basic firearms safety course within 5 years before making the purchase. Unlawful manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm is a class 2 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 6 felony. The department of revenue shall revoke the state firearms dealer permit of a dealer who unlawfully manufactures, distributes, transfers, sells, or purchases a specified semiautomatic firearm.
Rep. Emily Sirota · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB24-1353: Firearms Dealer Requirements & Permit. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires a firearms dealer (dealer), beginning July 1, 2025, to obtain a state firearms dealer permit (state permit) in order to engage in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices in Colorado. Engaging in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices without a permit is an unclassified felony, punishable by a fine of up to $250,000. In order to be issued a state permit, the dealer must hold a federal firearms license; not have had a federal, state, or local license to deal firearms or ammunition revoked, suspended, or denied within the prior 3 years; and not have violated any state or federal law concerning the possession, purchase, or sale of firearms in the 3 years before applying for the state permit. The department of revenue (department) is responsible for issuing state permits. The fee for issuing a permit is $400, which may be adjusted annually by the department. A state permit is valid for 3 years. The department, subject to available appropriations, is required to conduct an on-site inspection of a random selection of 10% of state permit holders each year and, additionally, may conduct periodic unannounced dealer inspections. The department shall revoke a dealer's state permit if the dealer: No longer holds a valid federal firearms license; Does not permit a required inspection of the dealer's business or a required record; or Is convicted of obtaining a firearm for or transferring a firearm to a person who is ineligible to possess a firearm, transferring a firearm prior to receiving the results of a background check, trafficking in firearms, or unlawfully selling or transferring a firearm component or accessory. If the department finds that a dealer failed to post a required notice, make a report about unlawful purchase, or make a required record; transferred a firearm without a locking device; or violated other federal, state, or local laws concerning the sale of firearms or firearm components, the department shall: For a first offense, issue a warning; and For a second offense, issue a warning, suspend the dealer's permit, or revoke the dealer's state permit.
2024-06-07: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act requires a firearms dealer (dealer), beginning July 1, 2025, to obtain a state firearms dealer permit (state permit) in order to engage in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices in Colorado. Engaging in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices without a permit is an unclassified felony, punishable by a fine of up to $250,000. In order to be issued a state permit, the dealer must hold a federal firearms license; not have had a federal, state, or local license to deal firearms or ammunition revoked, suspended, or denied within the prior 3 years; and not have violated any state or federal law concerning the possession, purchase, or sale of firearms in the 3 years before applying for the state permit. The department of revenue (department) is responsible for issuing state permits. The fee for issuing a permit is $400, which may be adjusted annually by the department. A state permit is valid for 3 years. The department, subject to available appropriations, is required to conduct an on-site inspection of a random selection of 10% of state permit holders each year and, additionally, may conduct periodic unannounced dealer inspections. The department shall revoke a dealer's state permit if the dealer: No longer holds a valid federal firearms license; Does not permit a required inspection of the dealer's business or a required record; or Is convicted of obtaining a firearm for or transferring a firearm to a person who is ineligible to possess a firearm, transferring a firearm prior to receiving the results of a background check, trafficking in firearms, or unlawfully selling or transferring a firearm component or accessory. If the department finds that a dealer failed to post a required notice, make a report about unlawful purchase, or make a required record; transferred a firearm without a locking device; or violated other federal, state, or local laws concerning the sale of firearms or firearm components, the department shall: For a first offense, issue a warning; and For a second offense, issue a warning, suspend the dealer's permit, or revoke the dealer's state permit.
Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Junie Joseph · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of SB23-279: Unserialized Firearms And Firearm Components. Official enacted-bill summary: The act defines terms related to federal firearm licenses and firearm components, including "frame or receiver of a firearm" and "unfinished frame or receiver." The act prohibits: On and after January 1, 2024, knowingly possessing or transporting an unfinished firearm frame or receiver, unless it has been imprinted with a serial number as required by federal law; Knowingly selling, offering to sell, transferring, or purchasing an unfinished firearm frame or receiver, unless it has been imprinted with a serial number as required by federal law; On and after January 1, 2024, knowingly possessing, purchasing, transporting, or receiving a firearm or frame or receiver of a firearm that is not imprinted with a serial number; Knowingly selling, offering to sell, or transferring a firearm or frame or receiver of a firearm that is not imprinted with a serial number; and Manufacturing or causing to be manufactured a frame or receiver of a firearm; unless the manufacturer is a federally licensed firearm manufacturer. The act includes exceptions for each type of prohibited conduct, including specified exceptions for conduct involving federal firearm licensees and transfers to serialize a frame or receiver. A person who commits any of the prohibited conduct commits unlawful conduct involving an unserialized firearm, frame, or receiver. Unlawful conduct involving an unserialized firearm, frame, or receiver is a class 1 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 5 felony. The act requires a person who, on the effective date of the act, owns a firearm, frame, or receiver that the person manufactured and that is not imprinted with a serial number by a federal firearms licensee, to have the firearm, frame, or receiver imprinted with a serial number no later than January 1, 2024. The act prohibits the Colorado bureau of investigation from approving the transfer of a firearm to a person who was convicted of misdemeanor unlawful conduct involving an unserialized firearm, frame, or receiver within 5 years prior to the transfer.
2023-06-02: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act defines terms related to federal firearm licenses and firearm components, including "frame or receiver of a firearm" and "unfinished frame or receiver." The act prohibits: On and after January 1, 2024, knowingly possessing or transporting an unfinished firearm frame or receiver, unless it has been imprinted with a serial number as required by federal law; Knowingly selling, offering to sell, transferring, or purchasing an unfinished firearm frame or receiver, unless it has been imprinted with a serial number as required by federal law; On and after January 1, 2024, knowingly possessing, purchasing, transporting, or receiving a firearm or frame or receiver of a firearm that is not imprinted with a serial number; Knowingly selling, offering to sell, or transferring a firearm or frame or receiver of a firearm that is not imprinted with a serial number; and Manufacturing or causing to be manufactured a frame or receiver of a firearm; unless the manufacturer is a federally licensed firearm manufacturer. The act includes exceptions for each type of prohibited conduct, including specified exceptions for conduct involving federal firearm licensees and transfers to serialize a frame or receiver. A person who commits any of the prohibited conduct commits unlawful conduct involving an unserialized firearm, frame, or receiver. Unlawful conduct involving an unserialized firearm, frame, or receiver is a class 1 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 5 felony. The act requires a person who, on the effective date of the act, owns a firearm, frame, or receiver that the person manufactured and that is not imprinted with a serial number by a federal firearms licensee, to have the firearm, frame, or receiver imprinted with a serial number no later than January 1, 2024. The act prohibits the Colorado bureau of investigation from approving the transfer of a firearm to a person who was convicted of misdemeanor unlawful conduct involving an unserialized firearm, frame, or receiver within 5 years prior to the transfer.
Colorado House of Representatives, District 14 · R–CO
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Ava FlanellColorado Legislature · HB26-1212
Constitutional Carry of Handgun
Apr 7, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Ava Flanell · Sponsored / Rep. Carlos Barron · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1212: Constitutional Carry of Handgun. Official proposal summary: The bill grants a person who is at least 18 years old and permitted to possess a handgun pursuant to federal and state law the same authority to carry a concealed handgun as a person who holds a permit to carry a concealed handgun (permit). A person who carries a concealed handgun without a permit has the same rights, limitations, and authority to carry as a person who holds a permit. A person may obtain a permit for the purpose of using the permit to carry a concealed handgun in another state that recognizes a Colorado permit. The bill makes 18 years old the minimum age to obtain a permit. Under existing law, Colorado recognizes permits issued in other states that meet certain criteria, including that the holder of the out-of-state permit is at least 21 years old. The bill changes the minimum age for recognition of an out-of-state permit to 18 years old. Under existing law, a permit is valid for 5 years. The bill makes a permit valid for the life of the permit holder. Existing permits, other than temporary emergency permits, are converted to lifetime permits. Because the bill makes permits valid for the life of the holder, the bill repeals provisions relating to the renewal of permits. The bill repeals the temporary emergency permit to carry a concealed handgun. The bill repeals local government authority to regulate open or concealed carry of a handgun, including repealing the authority of special districts and the governing boards of institutions of higher education, as applicable. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2026-04-07: House Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill grants a person who is at least 18 years old and permitted to possess a handgun pursuant to federal and state law the same authority to carry a concealed handgun as a person who holds a permit to carry a concealed handgun (permit). A person who carries a concealed handgun without a permit has the same rights, limitations, and authority to carry as a person who holds a permit. A person may obtain a permit for the purpose of using the permit to carry a concealed handgun in another state that recognizes a Colorado permit. The bill makes 18 years old the minimum age to obtain a permit. Under existing law, Colorado recognizes permits issued in other states that meet certain criteria, including that the holder of the out-of-state permit is at least 21 years old. The bill changes the minimum age for recognition of an out-of-state permit to 18 years old. Under existing law, a permit is valid for 5 years. The bill makes a permit valid for the life of the permit holder. Existing permits, other than temporary emergency permits, are converted to lifetime permits. Because the bill makes permits valid for the life of the holder, the bill repeals provisions relating to the renewal of permits. The bill repeals the temporary emergency permit to carry a concealed handgun. The bill repeals local government authority to regulate open or concealed carry of a handgun, including repealing the authority of special districts and the governing boards of institutions of higher education, as applicable. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Discuss Adoption Information with Pregnant Persons
Mar 10, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Scott Slaugh · Sponsored / Rep. Ava Flanell · Sponsored / Sen. Lynda Zamora Wilson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1105: Discuss Adoption Information with Pregnant Persons. Official proposal summary: If a pregnant person presents to a health-care facility requesting an abortion, the bill requires the person's health-care provider, if willing, or another willing health-care provider to discuss, at least 24 hours before the abortion procedure, certain information related to adoption as a pregnancy outcome option, unless the person declines the discussion. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2026-03-10: House Committee on Health & Human Services Postpone Indefinitely. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
The fact counts reported abortions occurring in Colorado, including patients from other states and excluding Colorado residents treated elsewhere. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Abortions occurring in Colorado. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
If a pregnant person presents to a health-care facility requesting an abortion, the bill requires the person's health-care provider, if willing, or another willing health-care provider to discuss, at least 24 hours before the abortion procedure, certain information related to adoption as a pregnancy outcome option, unless the person declines the discussion. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Prime sponsorship of HB25B-1015: Preserve Medicaid Health-Care Services. Official proposal summary: The bill prohibits the department of health care policy and financing (HCPF) from reimbursing a: Health-care provider who, or entity or facility that, performs, assists in the performance of, or refers a person to abortion or gender-affirming health-care services; or A health-care provider, entity, or facility for providing medical services to a person who does not satisfy citizenship or residency requirements. The bill makes related conforming amendments. Under current law, HCPF administers the reproductive health-care program, the state medical assistance program, and the state children's basic health plan (collectively, "the programs") to certain individuals who are ineligible for the programs due to their immigration status. The bill repeals the programs and makes related conforming amendments. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2025-08-21: House Committee on Health & Human Services Postpone Indefinitely. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
The fact counts reported abortions occurring in Colorado, including patients from other states and excluding Colorado residents treated elsewhere. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Abortions occurring in Colorado · Medicaid and Child Health Plan Plus enrollment · Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill prohibits the department of health care policy and financing (HCPF) from reimbursing a: Health-care provider who, or entity or facility that, performs, assists in the performance of, or refers a person to abortion or gender-affirming health-care services; or A health-care provider, entity, or facility for providing medical services to a person who does not satisfy citizenship or residency requirements. The bill makes related conforming amendments. Under current law, HCPF administers the reproductive health-care program, the state medical assistance program, and the state children's basic health plan (collectively, "the programs") to certain individuals who are ineligible for the programs due to their immigration status. The bill repeals the programs and makes related conforming amendments. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Funding for School Safety Firearm Detection Systems
May 14, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Brandi Bradley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB24-1123: Funding for School Safety Firearm Detection Systems. Official proposal summary: The bill establishes the school safety firearm detection funding program (program) in the office of school safety (office) to disburse money to local education providers to purchase, install, and operate firearm detection software for use in schools. The office administers the program. In order to receive a disbursement, a local education provider must submit an application. The office shall disburse program money to eligible applicants in the order the applications are received. A recipient shall use program money to purchase and operate firearm detection software to detect, and alert local education provider personnel and first responders about, the presence of visible, unholstered firearms on school property. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2024-05-14: House Committee on Appropriations Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill establishes the school safety firearm detection funding program (program) in the office of school safety (office) to disburse money to local education providers to purchase, install, and operate firearm detection software for use in schools. The office administers the program. In order to receive a disbursement, a local education provider must submit an application. The office shall disburse program money to eligible applicants in the order the applications are received. A recipient shall use program money to purchase and operate firearm detection software to detect, and alert local education provider personnel and first responders about, the presence of visible, unholstered firearms on school property. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Colorado House of Representatives, District 27 · D–CO
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Brianna TitoneColorado Legislature · SB23-188
Protections For Accessing Reproductive Health Care
Apr 14, 2023 · Enacted
Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored / Rep. Meg Froelich · Sponsored / Rep. Brianna Titone · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of SB23-188: Protections For Accessing Reproductive Health Care. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires contracts between insurers or other persons and health-care providers regarding the delivery of health-care services to include a provision that prohibits the following actions if the actions are based solely on the health-care provider's provision of, or assistance in the provision of, reproductive health care or gender-affirming health-care services (legally protected health-care activity) in this state, so long as the care provided did not violate Colorado law: A medical malpractice insurer from refusing to issue, canceling or terminating, refusing to renew, or imposing any sanctions, fines, penalties, or rate increases for a medical malpractice policy (section 2); A health insurer from taking an adverse action against a health-care provider, including refusing to pay for a provided health-care service (section 3); A health insurer from refusing to credential a physician as a network provider or terminating a physician's status as a network provider (section 4); or A person or entity from terminating a health-care contract with a health-care provider, unless the person or entity is a religious organization and legally protected health-care activities conflict with the religious organization's bona fide religious beliefs and practices (section 25).
2023-04-21: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact counts reported abortions occurring in Colorado, including patients from other states and excluding Colorado residents treated elsewhere. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Abortions occurring in Colorado. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act requires contracts between insurers or other persons and health-care providers regarding the delivery of health-care services to include a provision that prohibits the following actions if the actions are based solely on the health-care provider's provision of, or assistance in the provision of, reproductive health care or gender-affirming health-care services (legally protected health-care activity) in this state, so long as the care provided did not violate Colorado law: A medical malpractice insurer from refusing to issue, canceling or terminating, refusing to renew, or imposing any sanctions, fines, penalties, or rate increases for a medical malpractice policy (section 2); A health insurer from taking an adverse action against a health-care provider, including refusing to pay for a provided health-care service (section 3); A health insurer from refusing to credential a physician as a network provider or terminating a physician's status as a network provider (section 4); or A person or entity from terminating a health-care contract with a health-care provider, unless the person or entity is a religious organization and legally protected health-care activities conflict with the religious organization's bona fide religious beliefs and practices (section 25).
Prime sponsorship of HB22-1094: Medicaid Assistance For Survivors Of Torture. Official proposal summary: Beginning January 1, 2023, the bill grants a survivor of torture who is receiving care and rehabilitation services from a rehabilitative service provider eligibility for medical assistance without federal financial participation. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2022-05-12: House Committee on Appropriations Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
The fact counts Health First Colorado enrollees, with Child Health Plan Plus reported separately. Eligibility, enrollment and renewal rules concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a change in enrollment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Medicaid and Child Health Plan Plus enrollment. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Beginning January 1, 2023, the bill grants a survivor of torture who is receiving care and rehabilitation services from a rehabilitative service provider eligibility for medical assistance without federal financial participation. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
U.S. House of Representatives, Colorado District 7 · D–CO
4 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Brittany PettersenU.S. Congress · Colorado delegation · HR 7447
Community Risk Training and Response Act of 2026
Feb 9, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Brittany Pettersen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Would provide one-year state grants for standardized extreme risk protection order training and implementation materials for courts, law enforcement and other specified participants.
2026-02-09: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.. No enactment is recorded in this snapshot.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Pettersen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryA BILLTo provide grants for technical assistance for State crisis intervention programs. 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Community Risk Training and Response Act of 2026. 2.GrantsThe Attorney General shall make grants to States for a term of 1 year in an amount of not less than $200,000 and not more than $500,000 for purposes of providing technical assistance to State and local— (1)law enforcement; (2)prosecutors; (3)judges and court staff; (4)healthcare providers; (5)educators; and (6)agencies designated to coordinate extreme risk protection order implementation, to develop standardized extreme risk protection order training, curriculum, and model implementation materials for States, and thereby to ensure consistent, evidence-based processes nationwide and support States in effective, timely implementation of State crisis intervention court proceedings and related programs or initiatives.
Would authorize Byrne justice-assistance grants to provide gun safes and other qualifying secure firearm-storage devices to individuals at no cost.
2026-02-09: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.. No enactment is recorded in this snapshot.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Pettersen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryA BILLTo amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to provide that grants under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program may be used for gun safe giveaway programs, and for other purposes. 1.Short title This Act may be cited as the Community Firearm Safety Act of 2026. 2.Gun safe giveaway programs authorized under Byrne grantsSection 501(a)(1) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10152(a)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following: (J)Programs to provide gun safes (or other devices that are designed to be or can be used to store a firearm and that are designed to be unlocked only by means of a key, a combination, or other similar means) to individuals, at no cost to the individuals..
Expand Firearm Transfer Background Check Requirements
Jun 19, 2021 · Enacted
Sen. Judy Amabile · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Woodrow · Sponsored / Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored / Rep. Brittany Pettersen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB21-1298: Expand Firearm Transfer Background Check Requirements. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires a licensed gun dealer to obtain approval for a firearms transfer from the Colorado bureau of investigation (bureau) prior to transferring a firearm. The act prohibits the bureau from approving the transfer of a firearm to a person who was convicted of specified misdemeanor offenses. The bureau is also prohibited from approving a firearms transfer until it determines that its background investigation is complete and that the transfer would not violate federal prohibitions on firearms possession or result in a violation of state law. A person may be denied a firearms transfer if there has not been a final disposition in criminal proceedings for certain offenses for which the prospective transferee, if convicted, would be prohibited from purchasing, receiving, or possessing a firearm. The act permits continued denial of the transfer when the bureau is unable to obtain the final disposition of a case that is no longer pending. A person who has been denied a firearms transfer following a background check can appeal the denial. The act establishes a 60-day deadline for the bureau to review background check records that prompted the denial and render a final administrative decision regarding the denial. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2021-06-19: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act requires a licensed gun dealer to obtain approval for a firearms transfer from the Colorado bureau of investigation (bureau) prior to transferring a firearm. The act prohibits the bureau from approving the transfer of a firearm to a person who was convicted of specified misdemeanor offenses. The bureau is also prohibited from approving a firearms transfer until it determines that its background investigation is complete and that the transfer would not violate federal prohibitions on firearms possession or result in a violation of state law. A person may be denied a firearms transfer if there has not been a final disposition in criminal proceedings for certain offenses for which the prospective transferee, if convicted, would be prohibited from purchasing, receiving, or possessing a firearm. The act permits continued denial of the transfer when the bureau is unable to obtain the final disposition of a case that is no longer pending. A person who has been denied a firearms transfer following a background check can appeal the denial. The act establishes a 60-day deadline for the bureau to review background check records that prompted the denial and render a final administrative decision regarding the denial. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sen. Tom Sullivan · Sponsored / Rep. Brittany Pettersen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB19-1177: Extreme Risk Protection Orders. Official enacted-bill summary: Firearms - extreme risk protection order - petition requirements - hearings - firearm surrender options - termination hearing - appropriation. The act creates the ability for a family or household member or a law enforcement officer to petition the court for a temporary extreme risk protection order (ERPO) beginning on January 1, 2020. The petitioner must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that a person poses a significant risk to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm. The petitioner must submit an affidavit signed under oath and penalty of perjury that sets forth facts to support the issuance of a temporary ERPO and a reasonable basis for believing they exist. The court must hold a temporary ERPO hearing in person or by telephone on the day the petition is filed or on the court day immediately following the day the petition is filed. After issuance of a temporary ERPO, the court must schedule a second hearing no later than 14 days following the issuance to determine whether the issuance of a continuing ERPO is warranted. The court shall appoint counsel to represent the respondent at the hearing. If a family or household member or a law enforcement officer establishes by clear and convincing evidence that a person poses a significant risk to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm, the court may issue a continuing ERPO. The ERPO prohibits the respondent from possessing, controlling, purchasing, or receiving a firearm for 364 days. Upon issuance of the ERPO, the respondent shall surrender all of his or her firearms and his or her concealed carry permit if the respondent has one. The respondent may surrender his or her firearms either to a law enforcement agency or a federally licensed firearms dealer, or, if the firearm is an antique or relic or curio, the firearm may be surrendered to a family member who is eligible to possess a firearm and who does not reside with the respondent.
2019-04-12: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Firearms - extreme risk protection order - petition requirements - hearings - firearm surrender options - termination hearing - appropriation. The act creates the ability for a family or household member or a law enforcement officer to petition the court for a temporary extreme risk protection order (ERPO) beginning on January 1, 2020. The petitioner must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that a person poses a significant risk to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm. The petitioner must submit an affidavit signed under oath and penalty of perjury that sets forth facts to support the issuance of a temporary ERPO and a reasonable basis for believing they exist. The court must hold a temporary ERPO hearing in person or by telephone on the day the petition is filed or on the court day immediately following the day the petition is filed. After issuance of a temporary ERPO, the court must schedule a second hearing no later than 14 days following the issuance to determine whether the issuance of a continuing ERPO is warranted. The court shall appoint counsel to represent the respondent at the hearing. If a family or household member or a law enforcement officer establishes by clear and convincing evidence that a person poses a significant risk to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm, the court may issue a continuing ERPO. The ERPO prohibits the respondent from possessing, controlling, purchasing, or receiving a firearm for 364 days. Upon issuance of the ERPO, the respondent shall surrender all of his or her firearms and his or her concealed carry permit if the respondent has one. The respondent may surrender his or her firearms either to a law enforcement agency or a federally licensed firearms dealer, or, if the firearm is an antique or relic or curio, the firearm may be surrendered to a family member who is eligible to possess a firearm and who does not reside with the respondent.
Colorado House of Representatives, District 48 · R–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Carlos BarronColorado Legislature · HB26-1212
Constitutional Carry of Handgun
Apr 7, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Ava Flanell · Sponsored / Rep. Carlos Barron · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1212: Constitutional Carry of Handgun. Official proposal summary: The bill grants a person who is at least 18 years old and permitted to possess a handgun pursuant to federal and state law the same authority to carry a concealed handgun as a person who holds a permit to carry a concealed handgun (permit). A person who carries a concealed handgun without a permit has the same rights, limitations, and authority to carry as a person who holds a permit. A person may obtain a permit for the purpose of using the permit to carry a concealed handgun in another state that recognizes a Colorado permit. The bill makes 18 years old the minimum age to obtain a permit. Under existing law, Colorado recognizes permits issued in other states that meet certain criteria, including that the holder of the out-of-state permit is at least 21 years old. The bill changes the minimum age for recognition of an out-of-state permit to 18 years old. Under existing law, a permit is valid for 5 years. The bill makes a permit valid for the life of the permit holder. Existing permits, other than temporary emergency permits, are converted to lifetime permits. Because the bill makes permits valid for the life of the holder, the bill repeals provisions relating to the renewal of permits. The bill repeals the temporary emergency permit to carry a concealed handgun. The bill repeals local government authority to regulate open or concealed carry of a handgun, including repealing the authority of special districts and the governing boards of institutions of higher education, as applicable. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2026-04-07: House Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill grants a person who is at least 18 years old and permitted to possess a handgun pursuant to federal and state law the same authority to carry a concealed handgun as a person who holds a permit to carry a concealed handgun (permit). A person who carries a concealed handgun without a permit has the same rights, limitations, and authority to carry as a person who holds a permit. A person may obtain a permit for the purpose of using the permit to carry a concealed handgun in another state that recognizes a Colorado permit. The bill makes 18 years old the minimum age to obtain a permit. Under existing law, Colorado recognizes permits issued in other states that meet certain criteria, including that the holder of the out-of-state permit is at least 21 years old. The bill changes the minimum age for recognition of an out-of-state permit to 18 years old. Under existing law, a permit is valid for 5 years. The bill makes a permit valid for the life of the permit holder. Existing permits, other than temporary emergency permits, are converted to lifetime permits. Because the bill makes permits valid for the life of the holder, the bill repeals provisions relating to the renewal of permits. The bill repeals the temporary emergency permit to carry a concealed handgun. The bill repeals local government authority to regulate open or concealed carry of a handgun, including repealing the authority of special districts and the governing boards of institutions of higher education, as applicable. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Only current Colorado officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Colorado statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Colorado snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Colorado, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.