Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.
High school or higher92.9%2020–2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher54%2020–2024 · #2 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher45.7%2020–2024 · #2 of 50 · highest first
Colorado over time
Explore Colorado readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Colorado officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Colorado effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Colorado change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Grade 4 reading Colorado · source units
ColoradoPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
72 of 72 reviewed Colorado actions match · 65 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.
Colorado · 2024: 220.9 · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Colorado. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Colorado · state comparison
Adult educational attainment
Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.
Colorado · 2020–202492.9%
Colorado rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
High school or higher
Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.
Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 92.9%2020–2024 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
94.9%
—
#2
Maine
94.8%
—
#3
Montana
94.6%
—
#4
New Hampshire
94.4%
—
#5
Wyoming
94.2%
—
#6
North Dakota
94%
—
#7
Minnesota
93.9%
—
#8
Wisconsin
93.6%
—
#9
Alaska
93.6%
—
#10
Utah
93.4%
—
#11
Iowa
93.3%
—
#12
South Dakota
93.2%
—
#13
Hawaii
93.2%
—
#14
Colorado · your comparison
92.9%
—
#15
Washington
92.3%
—
#16
Nebraska
92.2%
—
#17
Pennsylvania
92.1%
—
#18
Michigan
92.1%
—
#19
Kansas
92%
—
#20
Idaho
91.9%
—
#21
Missouri
91.9%
—
#22
Oregon
91.8%
—
#23
Ohio
91.8%
—
#24
Delaware
91.7%
—
#25
Virginia
91.6%
—
#26
Connecticut
91.5%
—
#27
Massachusetts
91.4%
—
#28
Maryland
91.1%
—
#29
New Jersey
90.7%
—
#30
Illinois
90.5%
—
#31
Indiana
90.4%
—
#32
North Carolina
90.1%
—
#33
South Carolina
90.1%
—
#34
Tennessee
90%
—
#35
Florida
89.9%
—
#36
Rhode Island
89.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
89.4%
—
#38
Arizona
89.4%
—
#39
West Virginia
89.3%
—
#40
Georgia
89.2%
—
#41
Kentucky
88.9%
—
#42
Arkansas
88.7%
—
#43
Alabama
88.6%
—
#44
New Mexico
88%
—
#45
New York
88%
—
#46
Nevada
87.5%
—
#47
Louisiana
87.3%
—
#48
Mississippi
87.1%
—
#49
Texas
86%
—
#50
California
84.7%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Colorado residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.
This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.
Colorado · 2024220.9
Colorado rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Grade 4 reading
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Colorado. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.
NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Colorado
2024 · Colorado: 220.9 · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Colorado Grade 4 reading history
Period
Colorado
Compare
2003
223.7
2005
223.7
2007
223.7
2009
225.7
2011
223.4
2013
226.7
2015
224
2017
224.7
2019
224.9
2022
222.9
2024
220.9
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 220.92024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Massachusetts
224.8
—
#2
Wyoming
221.9
—
#3
New Jersey
221.6
—
#4
New Hampshire
221.5
—
#5
Colorado · your comparison
220.9
—
#6
Indiana
220.1
—
#7
Utah
219.3
—
#8
Connecticut
219.2
—
#9
Mississippi
218.5
—
#10
Florida
218.2
—
#11
Kentucky
218
—
#12
Montana
217.2
—
#13
Rhode Island
216.3
—
#14
Louisiana
216
—
#14
Ohio
216
—
#16
Hawaii
215.8
—
#16
Pennsylvania
215.8
—
#18
Idaho
215.7
—
#18
Washington
215.7
—
#20
Maryland
215.6
—
#21
North Dakota
215.5
—
#22
Wisconsin
215.3
—
#23
Tennessee
215.1
—
#24
South Carolina
214.9
—
#25
Iowa
214.6
—
#25
New York
214.6
—
#27
Georgia
214.4
—
#27
Minnesota
214.4
—
#29
Illinois
214.2
—
#30
South Dakota
214.1
—
#30
Virginia
214.1
—
#32
North Carolina
213.4
—
#33
Alabama
213.2
—
#34
Kansas
213.1
—
#34
Nevada
213.1
—
#36
Vermont
212.7
—
#37
Missouri
211.9
—
#37
Texas
211.9
—
#39
California
211.7
—
#39
Nebraska
211.7
—
#41
Arkansas
209.7
—
#42
Maine
209.6
—
#43
Delaware
209.5
—
#44
Michigan
209.1
—
#45
Arizona
208.1
—
#46
Oklahoma
207.3
—
#47
Oregon
207
—
#48
West Virginia
205.9
—
#49
Alaska
201.6
—
#50
New Mexico
200.6
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.
Colorado · FY2024$15,908
Colorado rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current spending per pupil
Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.
Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · $15,908FY2024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$31,918
—
#2
Vermont
$28,818
—
#3
New Jersey
$27,234
—
#4
Connecticut
$26,316
—
#5
Massachusetts
$24,429
—
#6
Hawaii
$23,878
—
#7
New Hampshire
$22,978
—
#8
Delaware
$22,201
—
#9
Rhode Island
$22,110
—
#10
Illinois
$21,776
—
#11
Pennsylvania
$21,091
—
#12
Alaska
$21,004
—
#13
California
$20,791
—
#14
Wyoming
$20,521
—
#15
Maryland
$20,208
—
#16
Maine
$19,962
—
#17
Washington
$18,564
—
#18
Michigan
$18,314
—
#19
Oregon
$18,083
—
#20
New Mexico
$17,664
—
#21
Ohio
$17,257
—
#22
Virginia
$17,104
—
#23
North Dakota
$17,102
—
#24
Minnesota
$17,098
—
#25
Nebraska
$16,147
—
#26
Wisconsin
$15,952
—
#27
Colorado · your comparison
$15,908
—
#28
Georgia
$15,833
—
#29
West Virginia
$15,640
—
#30
Louisiana
$15,581
—
#31
Kansas
$15,558
—
#32
South Carolina
$15,060
—
#33
Nevada
$14,812
—
#34
Kentucky
$14,596
—
#35
Iowa
$14,369
—
#36
Missouri
$14,241
—
#37
Arkansas
$13,873
—
#38
Montana
$13,656
—
#39
Alabama
$13,627
—
#40
Indiana
$13,622
—
#41
North Carolina
$12,995
—
#42
Texas
$12,895
—
#43
Tennessee
$12,882
—
#44
South Dakota
$12,828
—
#45
Florida
$12,693
—
#46
Mississippi
$12,324
—
#47
Oklahoma
$12,162
—
#48
Arizona
$12,003
—
#49
Utah
$11,347
—
#50
Idaho
$11,060
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.
Colorado · 2021–2282%
Colorado rank#40among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate
Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.
Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Colorado
2021–22 · Colorado: 82% · Rank #40 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Colorado Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
Period
Colorado
Compare
2011–12
75%
2012–13
77%
2013–14
77%
2014–15
77%
2015–16
79%
2016–17
79%
2017–18
81%
2018–19
81%
2019–20
82%
2020–21
82%
2021–22
82%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · 82%2021–22 · Rank #40 of 48, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
West Virginia
91%
—
#2
Iowa
90%
—
#2
Kentucky
90%
—
#2
Massachusetts
90%
—
#2
Missouri
90%
—
#2
Tennessee
90%
—
#2
Texas
90%
—
#2
Wisconsin
90%
—
#9
Connecticut
89%
—
#9
Kansas
89%
—
#9
Mississippi
89%
—
#9
Virginia
89%
—
#13
Alabama
88%
—
#13
Arkansas
88%
—
#13
Delaware
88%
—
#13
Indiana
88%
—
#13
New Hampshire
88%
—
#13
Utah
88%
—
#19
California
87%
—
#19
Florida
87%
—
#19
Illinois
87%
—
#19
Nebraska
87%
—
#19
New York
87%
—
#19
Pennsylvania
87%
—
#25
Hawaii
86%
—
#25
Maine
86%
—
#25
Maryland
86%
—
#25
Montana
86%
—
#25
North Carolina
86%
—
#25
Ohio
86%
—
#31
New Jersey
85%
—
#31
North Dakota
85%
—
#33
Georgia
84%
—
#33
Minnesota
84%
—
#33
South Carolina
84%
—
#33
Washington
84%
—
#37
Louisiana
83%
—
#37
Rhode Island
83%
—
#37
Vermont
83%
—
#40
Colorado · your comparison
82%
—
#40
Nevada
82%
—
#40
South Dakota
82%
—
#40
Wyoming
82%
—
#44
Michigan
81%
—
#44
Oregon
81%
—
#46
Idaho
80%
—
#47
Alaska
78%
—
#48
Arizona
77%
—
—
New Mexico
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Oklahoma
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.
Colorado · 2022–23$9,798
Colorado rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees
Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.
2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.
Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Colorado · $9,7982022–23 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
$17,600
—
#2
New Hampshire
$17,019
—
#3
Pennsylvania
$16,217
—
#4
Connecticut
$15,763
—
#5
New Jersey
$15,265
—
#6
Illinois
$14,921
—
#7
Virginia
$14,825
—
#8
Rhode Island
$14,744
—
#9
Michigan
$14,718
—
#10
Massachusetts
$14,345
—
#11
Minnesota
$12,873
—
#12
South Carolina
$12,604
—
#13
Oregon
$12,424
—
#14
Delaware
$11,922
—
#15
Arizona
$11,768
—
#16
Kentucky
$11,299
—
#17
Alabama
$11,081
—
#18
Ohio
$10,922
—
#19
Maine
$10,813
—
#20
Hawaii
$10,484
—
#21
Tennessee
$10,437
—
#22
Iowa
$10,121
—
#23
Maryland
$10,041
—
#24
Missouri
$9,926
—
#25
Indiana
$9,886
—
#26
Louisiana
$9,843
—
#27
Colorado · your comparison
$9,798
—
#28
North Dakota
$9,728
—
#29
Kansas
$9,274
—
#30
Mississippi
$9,120
—
#31
South Dakota
$9,079
—
#32
Wisconsin
$8,974
—
#33
Arkansas
$8,879
—
#34
Nebraska
$8,862
—
#35
West Virginia
$8,715
—
#36
California
$8,637
—
#37
New York
$8,575
—
#38
Oklahoma
$8,519
—
#39
Alaska
$8,291
—
#40
Texas
$8,195
—
#41
Washington
$8,006
—
#42
Idaho
$7,640
—
#43
New Mexico
$7,526
—
#44
North Carolina
$7,327
—
#45
Montana
$7,299
—
#46
Utah
$7,215
—
#47
Georgia
$7,075
—
#48
Nevada
$6,723
—
#49
Wyoming
$5,100
—
#50
Florida
$4,540
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
72 of 72 reviewed Colorado actions · newest first
Jul 2, 2026 · AG 2026-07-02 · Attorney General Weiser joins multistate opposition to Postal Service’s attempt to undermine voting rights · Reported actionColorado agencies · AG 2026-07-02
Attorney General Weiser joins multistate opposition to Postal Service’s attempt to undermine voting rights
Jul 2, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Phil Weiser · Submitted comments
FactVote reviewed summary
Submitted formal comments opposing proposed USPS restrictions on mail voting and asking the agency to withdraw them.
Reported in the official release dated 2026-07-02. The release date may follow a filing or court order. Litigation, guidance and proposed settlements do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
The fact divides general-election ballots cast by registered voters. Registration rules can affect the denominator; voting access and ballot counting concern the numerator. This is not turnout among all voting-age residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Postal Service’s attempt to aid the president’s efforts to seize control of elections and restrict mail voting through a proposed rule and asking the Postal Service to withdraw the proposed rule. “This is another unlawful attempt by the Trump administration to seize control of elections that are administered by the states,” said Attorney General Weiser. “Colorado is a national leader in secure, accessible elections, and we won’t stand by while the federal government tries to rewrite the rules and create new barriers for eligible voters.” On March 31, President Trump signed an executive order attempting to establish a national list of eligible voters and directing USPS, an independent federal agency, to transmit mail ballots only to voters on that list. The order also threatened states and election officials with criminal prosecution and the loss of federal funding if they did not comply. A federal judge struck down that executive order last week in a lawsuit joined by Attorney General Weiser (PDF), with the order applying to 24 states total. Nevertheless, USPS has not withdrawn its proposed rule to implement the order. Under the proposal, USPS would create a centralized voter list and refuse to deliver ballots to eligible voters who are not on it, effectively giving the federal government control over mail voting. In the comment letter, the attorneys general argue the proposed rule violates the federal court’s order and represents an unconstitutional federal power grab. They also argue the proposal conflicts with USPS’s governing statutes and other federal voting laws. The proposed rule would take effect before the 2026 election, forcing states to overhaul their election procedures and conduct statewide voter education just months before mail voting begins. Those last-minute changes would create confusion, disrupt election administration, and risk disenfranchising eligible voters. State and federal law protect the right of eligible voters to cast ballots and have them counted. Voters of all political parties, in every state, rely on mail voting, including the president himself. This week’s Supreme Court decision in Watson v.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 3, 2026 · AG 2026-06-03 · Attorney General Weiser announces new suicide and violence prevention trainings for families, community members, and educators · Reported actionColorado agencies · AG 2026-06-03
Attorney General Weiser announces new suicide and violence prevention trainings for families, community members, and educators
Jun 3, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Phil Weiser · Launched training
FactVote reviewed summary
Launched free training on identifying suicide and violence risks and using extreme risk protection orders to restrict firearm access when a person poses a danger.
Reported in the official release dated 2026-06-03. The release date may follow a filing or court order. Litigation, guidance and proposed settlements do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths · Homicide deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
June 3, 2026 (DENVER) — Attorney General Phil Weiser today announced new free, virtual trainings designed to help Colorado families, community members, and educators recognize warning signs of suicide and violence and better understand prevention tools, including Colorado’s Extreme Risk Protection Order law. The trainings are being launched as Colorado continues to face one of the nation’s highest suicide rates and ongoing challenges related to firearm violence. “Violence and suicide are often preventable when people know the warning signs and understand the tools available to help,” said Attorney General Weiser. “Whether it’s a parent concerned about a loved one, a community member worried about someone in crisis, or an educator supporting a student, these trainings provide practical information that can help save lives. By helping people recognize warning signs and take action early, we can help prevent acts of violence, support people in crisis, and build safer communities across Colorado.” New training for families and community members The Colorado Attorney General’s Office’s new ERPO training for family and community members is designed for people who may be in a position to recognize warning signs that someone is at risk of harming themselves or others. The training is particularly relevant for family and household members who are eligible to petition for an Extreme Risk Protection Order, or ERPO, under Colorado law and helps participants understand warning signs associated with suicide and firearm violence risk, when an ERPO may be appropriate, and how the ERPO process works. New training for educators The office is also launching a new teen dating violence prevention training for educators that helps school personnel recognize signs of teen dating violence, understand its impact on student safety and wellbeing, and identify appropriate intervention and support resources. The training builds upon the ERPO curriculum for educators released by the Colorado Attorney General’s Office in 2025.
Signed HB26-1113: Modifications to Elections. The act modifies the 'Uniform Election Code of 1992' (code) as follows: Regarding elections generally, includes in the definition of 'identification' for purposes of the code a division of youth services identification card or written correspondence from a county sheriff to the county clerk indicating that an elector is confined in a county jail or detention facility; repeals the definition of 'political party district'; modifies the definition of 'video security surveillance recording' to include a system in which continuous recording is triggered when motion is detected; modifies the definition of 'watcher' to prohibit a person from being selected as a watcher if the person has been convicted of certain election offenses or of committing or conspiracy to commit certain federal offenses; if the governor declares a disaster emergency due to the inability to strictly comply with the code, allows the secretary of state (secretary) to adopt rules for the proper administration of an election and requires the governor to establish an election emergency advisory group to advise the secretary and the governor regarding emergency orders or rules necessary to ensure the proper administration of an election; allows the secretary to provide access to, rather than transmit a complete copy of, all pertinent, updated elections laws to each county clerk and recorder (clerk); and requires each clerk to set operational hours for the clerk's office; Regarding the qualification and registration of electors; specifies information that all institutions of higher education, rather than just state institutions of higher education, must provide to students via email or signs concerning voting, voter eligibility, and registration, and requires the secretary to adopt rules further specifying the form and content of the emails and signs; requires the clerk to make printed affidavit forms available to correct an error in the elector's affiliation recorded in the statewide database; requires the secretary to ensure preregistrants who are 17 years and 6 months old can access their voter registration information and update that information using the state's online voter registration system; r
2026-06-01: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability. This records the governor’s dated action; signing is separate from implementation.
Why this record is included
The fact divides general-election ballots cast by registered voters. Registration rules can affect the denominator; voting access and ballot counting concern the numerator. This is not turnout among all voting-age residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act modifies the 'Uniform Election Code of 1992' (code) as follows: Regarding elections generally, includes in the definition of 'identification' for purposes of the code a division of youth services identification card or written correspondence from a county sheriff to the county clerk indicating that an elector is confined in a county jail or detention facility; repeals the definition of 'political party district'; modifies the definition of 'video security surveillance recording' to include a system in which continuous recording is triggered when motion is detected; modifies the definition of 'watcher' to prohibit a person from being selected as a watcher if the person has been convicted of certain election offenses or of committing or conspiracy to commit certain federal offenses; if the governor declares a disaster emergency due to the inability to strictly comply with the code, allows the secretary of state (secretary) to adopt rules for the proper administration of an election and requires the governor to establish an election emergency advisory group to advise the secretary and the governor regarding emergency orders or rules necessary to ensure the proper administration of an election; allows the secretary to provide access to, rather than transmit a complete copy of, all pertinent, updated elections laws to each county clerk and recorder (clerk); and requires each clerk to set operational hours for the clerk's office; Regarding the qualification and registration of electors; specifies information that all institutions of higher education, rather than just state institutions of higher education, must provide to students via email or signs concerning voting, voter eligibility, and registration, and requires the secretary to adopt rules further specifying the form and content of the emails and signs; requires the clerk to make printed affidavit forms available to correct an error in the elector's affiliation recorded in the statewide database; requires the secretary to ensure preregistrants who are 17 years and 6 months old can access their voter registration information and update that information using the state's online voter registration system; r
Rep. Emily Sirota · Sponsored / Rep. Jenny Willford · Sponsored / Sen. Katie Wallace · Sponsored / Sen. Mike Weissman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1113: Modifications to Elections. Official enacted-bill summary: The act modifies the 'Uniform Election Code of 1992' (code) as follows: Regarding elections generally, includes in the definition of 'identification' for purposes of the code a division of youth services identification card or written correspondence from a county sheriff to the county clerk indicating that an elector is confined in a county jail or detention facility; repeals the definition of 'political party district'; modifies the definition of 'video security surveillance recording' to include a system in which continuous recording is triggered when motion is detected; modifies the definition of 'watcher' to prohibit a person from being selected as a watcher if the person has been convicted of certain election offenses or of committing or conspiracy to commit certain federal offenses; if the governor declares a disaster emergency due to the inability to strictly comply with the code, allows the secretary of state (secretary) to adopt rules for the proper administration of an election and requires the governor to establish an election emergency advisory group to advise the secretary and the governor regarding emergency orders or rules necessary to ensure the proper administration of an election; allows the secretary to provide access to, rather than transmit a complete copy of, all pertinent, updated elections laws to each county clerk and recorder (clerk); and requires each clerk to set operational hours for the clerk's office; Regarding the qualification and registration of electors; specifies information that all institutions of higher education, rather than just state institutions of higher education, must provide to students via email or signs concerning voting, voter eligibility, and registration, and requires the secretary to adopt rules further specifying the form and content of the emails and signs; requires the clerk to make printed affidavit forms available to correct an error in the elector's affiliation recorded in the statewide database; requires the secretary to ensure preregistrants who are 17 years and 6 months old can access their voter registration information and update that information using the state's online voter registration system; r
2026-06-01: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact divides general-election ballots cast by registered voters. Registration rules can affect the denominator; voting access and ballot counting concern the numerator. This is not turnout among all voting-age residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act modifies the 'Uniform Election Code of 1992' (code) as follows: Regarding elections generally, includes in the definition of 'identification' for purposes of the code a division of youth services identification card or written correspondence from a county sheriff to the county clerk indicating that an elector is confined in a county jail or detention facility; repeals the definition of 'political party district'; modifies the definition of 'video security surveillance recording' to include a system in which continuous recording is triggered when motion is detected; modifies the definition of 'watcher' to prohibit a person from being selected as a watcher if the person has been convicted of certain election offenses or of committing or conspiracy to commit certain federal offenses; if the governor declares a disaster emergency due to the inability to strictly comply with the code, allows the secretary of state (secretary) to adopt rules for the proper administration of an election and requires the governor to establish an election emergency advisory group to advise the secretary and the governor regarding emergency orders or rules necessary to ensure the proper administration of an election; allows the secretary to provide access to, rather than transmit a complete copy of, all pertinent, updated elections laws to each county clerk and recorder (clerk); and requires each clerk to set operational hours for the clerk's office; Regarding the qualification and registration of electors; specifies information that all institutions of higher education, rather than just state institutions of higher education, must provide to students via email or signs concerning voting, voter eligibility, and registration, and requires the secretary to adopt rules further specifying the form and content of the emails and signs; requires the clerk to make printed affidavit forms available to correct an error in the elector's affiliation recorded in the statewide database; requires the secretary to ensure preregistrants who are 17 years and 6 months old can access their voter registration information and update that information using the state's online voter registration system; r
SB 26-023 sets statewide base per-pupil funding at $8,900.40 for 2026–27, revises school-finance and charter-school allocations, changes education requirements, and makes and reduces specified appropriations. The base funding amount is part of a school-finance formula. The act’s total program funding includes more than the state appropriation and does not measure spending already made or student outcomes.
Signed on 2026-05-28. Governor approval May 28, 2026. Funding applies to specified budget years; approval and actual expenditures are separate milestones. The base funding amount is part of a school-finance formula. The act’s total program funding includes more than the state appropriation and does not measure spending already made or student outcomes.
Why this record is included
SB 26-023 sets statewide base per-pupil funding at $8,900.40 for 2026–27, revises school-finance and charter-school allocations, changes education requirements, and makes and reduces specified appropriations. The base funding amount is part of a school-finance formula. The act’s total program funding includes more than the state appropriation and does not measure spending already made or student outcomes. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Colorado evidence context: education · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sets a new statewide base per pupil funding amount for the 2026-27 budget year at $8,900.40;
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 27, 2026 · HB26-1335 · Abortion Medication Access on College Campuses · EnactedColorado Legislature · HB26-1335
Abortion Medication Access on College Campuses
May 27, 2026 · Enacted
Rep. Lorena Garcia · Sponsored / Rep. Kenny Nguyen · Sponsored / Sen. Katie Wallace · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1335: Abortion Medication Access on College Campuses. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires an institution of higher education (institution) that operates a student health center to provide abortion medication to all students enrolled at the institution. The act requires an institution that has an on-site prescription drug outlet or other outlet to maintain a stock of and provide access to abortion medication to students enrolled at the institution. The act requires an institution that does not have an on-site prescription drug outlet or other outlet to either submit a prescription for abortion medication to an off-campus prescription drug outlet or other outlet or dispense abortion medication through the institution's student health center if permitted by the student health center's licensure. The act prohibits an institution from knowingly providing personally identifiable information contained in a student's patient records, billing records, or precise location data related to accessing abortion medication in response to a request from another state seeking to impose liability for accessing abortion medication. An institution is not required to provide access to or stock abortion medication if doing so would jeopardize an institution's federal grant participation, require the institution to deviate from generally accepted billing practices, modify the generally accepted standards of medical practice, or conflict with the institution's sincerely held religious beliefs or practices. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2026-05-27: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact counts reported abortions occurring in Colorado, including patients from other states and excluding Colorado residents treated elsewhere. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this occurrence measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Abortions occurring in Colorado. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act requires an institution of higher education (institution) that operates a student health center to provide abortion medication to all students enrolled at the institution. The act requires an institution that has an on-site prescription drug outlet or other outlet to maintain a stock of and provide access to abortion medication to students enrolled at the institution. The act requires an institution that does not have an on-site prescription drug outlet or other outlet to either submit a prescription for abortion medication to an off-campus prescription drug outlet or other outlet or dispense abortion medication through the institution's student health center if permitted by the student health center's licensure. The act prohibits an institution from knowingly providing personally identifiable information contained in a student's patient records, billing records, or precise location data related to accessing abortion medication in response to a request from another state seeking to impose liability for accessing abortion medication. An institution is not required to provide access to or stock abortion medication if doing so would jeopardize an institution's federal grant participation, require the institution to deviate from generally accepted billing practices, modify the generally accepted standards of medical practice, or conflict with the institution's sincerely held religious beliefs or practices. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Colorado officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Colorado candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
52 statements from 12 candidates
2026 Colorado Governor / Lt. Governor — General Election
4 candidates with matching statements · 28 statements
Fund tele-behavioral health permanently with broadband investments so a kid in Springfield, Colorado can see a licensed counselor without leaving their school.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Fund tele-behavioral health permanently with broadband investments so a kid in Springfield, Colorado can see a licensed counselor without leaving their school.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Implement universal trauma-informed training for educators, paraprofessionals, school resource officers, and bus drivers — every adult a kid encounters on a school day.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Implement universal trauma-informed training for educators, paraprofessionals, school resource officers, and bus drivers — every adult a kid encounters on a school day.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Mandate a 1:250 student-to-counselor ratio in every Colorado public school district within four years, with state funding to back it up — recognizing the American School Counselor Association’s recommended ratio.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Mandate a 1:250 student-to-counselor ratio in every Colorado public school district within four years, with state funding to back it up — recognizing the American School Counselor Association’s recommended ratio.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My administration will work to expand partnerships between schools, businesses, unions, and trade organizations to strengthen vocational education and workforce development programs that lead directly to good-paying jobs.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
My administration will work to expand partnerships between schools, businesses, unions, and trade organizations to strengthen vocational education and workforce development programs that lead directly to good-paying jobs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will veto any legislation that seeks to implement policies that weaken or removes parental access to school information, weakens communication between schools and families, and removes or interferes with the right of parents to guide the upbringing of their children.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
I will veto any legislation that seeks to implement policies that weaken or removes parental access to school information, weakens communication between schools and families, and removes or interferes with the right of parents to guide the upbringing of their children.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I will publicly speak about the importance of strong families and ensure that all residents of Colorado embrace the absolute moral truth that parents deserve transparency, respect, and involvement in decisions affecting their children’s education, health, safety, and well-being.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will publicly speak about the importance of strong families and ensure that all residents of Colorado embrace the absolute moral truth that parents deserve transparency, respect, and involvement in decisions affecting their children’s education, health, safety, and well-being.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I will work to restore local control whenever possible by reducing unnecessary state mandates and empowering counties, municipalities, and school districts to make decisions that best serve their communities. One-size-fits-all government policies often create unintended consequences tha…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will work to restore local control whenever possible by reducing unnecessary state mandates and empowering counties, municipalities, and school districts to make decisions that best serve their communities. One-size-fits-all government policies often create unintended consequences that hurt local communities.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My administration will support stronger efforts to combat child exploitation and trafficking, improve youth mental health services, strengthen school safety, and encourage healthier childhood development. Colorado’s future depends on raising strong, healthy, and resilient young people who are prepar…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and justice
Candidate campaign source
My administration will support stronger efforts to combat child exploitation and trafficking, improve youth mental health services, strengthen school safety, and encourage healthier childhood development. Colorado’s future depends on raising strong, healthy, and resilient young people who are prepared to succeed in life.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I will work towards expanding educational opportunities in every school district through school choice, charter schools, home schooling support, career pathways, and vocational training programs that prepare students for real-world success.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will work towards expanding educational opportunities in every school district through school choice, charter schools, home schooling support, career pathways, and vocational training programs that prepare students for real-world success.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Ensure every kid has at least one mentor and the support they need by: Creating a statewide mentorship program, called HOPE. Increasing access to in school mental health professionals and services, including in school screenings. Expanding mental health support through promotion of telehealth and pr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Ensure every kid has at least one mentor and the support they need by: Creating a statewide mentorship program, called HOPE. Increasing access to in school mental health professionals and services, including in school screenings. Expanding mental health support through promotion of telehealth and programs like I Matter.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will support legislation enabling parents to choose the best educational environment—public, charter, magnet, online, homeschool, or private—while ensuring that funding follows the student, consistent with C.R.S. § 22-54-101 et seq. My administration will work with the General Assembly to expand e…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
I will support legislation enabling parents to choose the best educational environment—public, charter, magnet, online, homeschool, or private—while ensuring that funding follows the student, consistent with C.R.S. § 22-54-101 et seq. My administration will work with the General Assembly to expand education savings accounts (ESAs) and open-enrollment options.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I will enact a statutory Parents’ Right to Know framework requiring every public school district to provide full, timely access to curriculum, instructional materials, library inventories, learning objectives, and district policies, consistent with C.R.S. § 22-1-104.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will enact a statutory Parents’ Right to Know framework requiring every public school district to provide full, timely access to curriculum, instructional materials, library inventories, learning objectives, and district policies, consistent with C.R.S. § 22-1-104.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I will prioritize salary increases for teachers—not bureaucrats—by requiring districts to reduce excessive administrative overhead under C.R.S. § 22-44-204. My administration will support reforms that redirect dollars into classrooms, including caps on non-instructional spending growth …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I will prioritize salary increases for teachers—not bureaucrats—by requiring districts to reduce excessive administrative overhead under C.R.S. § 22-44-204. My administration will support reforms that redirect dollars into classrooms, including caps on non-instructional spending growth and audits of district management structures.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Colorado’s teachers deserve competitive pay, and students deserve classrooms staffed by highly qualified educators. We can achieve both by cutting waste—not cutting teachers.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education & Parental Rights
Candidate campaign source
Colorado’s teachers deserve competitive pay, and students deserve classrooms staffed by highly qualified educators. We can achieve both by cutting waste—not cutting teachers.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will direct the Departments of Labor and Education to expand apprenticeship pathways and establish a statewide Skilled Trades Scholarship Program under C.R.S. § 23-3.3-401. Scholarships will prioritize high-demand fields such as welding, HVAC, electrical, pipefitting, cybersecurity, and advanced m…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
I will direct the Departments of Labor and Education to expand apprenticeship pathways and establish a statewide Skilled Trades Scholarship Program under C.R.S. § 23-3.3-401. Scholarships will prioritize high-demand fields such as welding, HVAC, electrical, pipefitting, cybersecurity, and advanced manufacturing.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My administration will partner with industry leaders to guarantee interview opportunities, paid training tracks, and stable career pipelines so students graduate with skills that lead to immediate employment.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education & Parental Rights
Candidate campaign source
My administration will partner with industry leaders to guarantee interview opportunities, paid training tracks, and stable career pipelines so students graduate with skills that lead to immediate employment.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My administration will require districts to publish all materials online in a searchable format, ensuring parental review before content is taught. Parents have a constitutional right to direct the upbringing and education of their children under Colo. Const. art. II, § 3, and I will ensure that rig…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
My administration will require districts to publish all materials online in a searchable format, ensuring parental review before content is taught. Parents have a constitutional right to direct the upbringing and education of their children under Colo. Const. art. II, § 3, and I will ensure that right is respected in every school.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My administration will propose amendments to C.R.S. § 44-40-111 to allocate a defined portion of lottery proceeds toward expanding vocational and technical training facilities—including trade schools, certificate programs, and regional workforce centers.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
My administration will propose amendments to C.R.S. § 44-40-111 to allocate a defined portion of lottery proceeds toward expanding vocational and technical training facilities—including trade schools, certificate programs, and regional workforce centers.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Update 60 days till election day! Nov. 3rd 2026 VOTE RED up and down the ballot! Common Sense Safety Economy Education I was hacked 9/2/26, my website was broken into and changed. In the process of rebuilding it. The enemy, prey they can be better. Denver CD1 We want a safe, strong, smart Colorado. …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
Update 60 days till election day! Nov. 3rd 2026 VOTE RED up and down the ballot! Common Sense Safety Economy Education I was hacked 9/2/26, my website was broken into and changed. In the process of rebuilding it. The enemy, prey they can be better. Denver CD1 We want a safe, strong, smart Colorado. Secure Campaign contributions link Anedot here Thank You! September 3, 2026
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Joe’s public service is rooted in his firm belief that we should be expanding—not restricting—opportunities for all Coloradans, and he has spent his career doing the same. The opportunity to obtain a quality education, participate in our economy, and live in a safe community. To enjoy our treasured …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Joe’s public service is rooted in his firm belief that we should be expanding—not restricting—opportunities for all Coloradans, and he has spent his career doing the same. The opportunity to obtain a quality education, participate in our economy, and live in a safe community. To enjoy our treasured public lands. To shape our democracy. And ultimately, the opportunity to pursue your dreams in our incredible country. Joe’s belief that all Coloradans are entitled to these opportunities, shaped by his parent’s journey and experience, has been a guiding principle in his life, and he is honored to fight for these opportunities each and every day in the United States Congress.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Joe believes that the American dream should be attainable for every family, including access to a good-paying job, quality public schools and economic opportunity. In Congress, Joe is fighting to close the gender pay gap and raise the minimum wage to $15, through the Paycheck Fairness Act and Raise …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Joe believes that the American dream should be attainable for every family, including access to a good-paying job, quality public schools and economic opportunity. In Congress, Joe is fighting to close the gender pay gap and raise the minimum wage to $15, through the Paycheck Fairness Act and Raise the Wage Act. He is also advocating for paid leave, affordable child care and expanded nutrition assistance to support working families. His proposal to increase the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by 15% was signed into law in 2021. In 2020, Joe helped lead an investigation into anti-competitive behavior in the digital marketplace, to ensure that small business innovation and entrepreneurship is not threatened by the monopoly power of big tech. He also helped secure PPP, EIDL and Restaurant Revitalization Funds for struggling small businesses in his district amidst the economic crisis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Every student should be able to obtain a quality public-school education. To support Colorado’s rural and mountain communities, Joe introduced and enacted legislation to support rural schools through funds for supplies, building improvements and more. To support college students, Joe is sponsoring m…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Every student should be able to obtain a quality public-school education. To support Colorado’s rural and mountain communities, Joe introduced and enacted legislation to support rural schools through funds for supplies, building improvements and more. To support college students, Joe is sponsoring measures to expand the use of free, open-access textbooks and make the transfer process easier for students at community college. Joe has also sponsored measures to ensure that every public higher education graduate finishes debt-free, and to protect the internet as a vital tool for innovation and economic growth by reinstituting net neutrality and preserving internet freedom. Joe also continues to fight for increasing teacher pay, federal Title I funding for low-income students, and federal Title II funding for teacher training, and during the House appropriations process, he successfully worked with his colleagues to secure millions of dollars in increased funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to ensure every student is set up to succeed, regardless of their background or abilities.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Protect Parental RightsSupport policies that ensure parents remain fully informed and involved in decisions regarding their children's education, healthcare, safety, and wellbeing.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Pro-FamilyPolicies.
Candidate campaign source
Protect Parental RightsSupport policies that ensure parents remain fully informed and involved in decisions regarding their children's education, healthcare, safety, and wellbeing.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Parents should have full access to curriculum information, school records, and decisions involving their children's education, safety, and wellbeing. Families deserve transparency and a meaningful voice in their child's education.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: EducationReform.
Candidate campaign source
Parents should have full access to curriculum information, school records, and decisions involving their children's education, safety, and wellbeing. Families deserve transparency and a meaningful voice in their child's education.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Support policies that ensure parents remain fully informed and involved in decisions regarding their children's education, healthcare, safety, and wellbeing.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Pro-FamilyPolicies.
Candidate campaign source
Support policies that ensure parents remain fully informed and involved in decisions regarding their children's education, healthcare, safety, and wellbeing.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Every child deserves a safe, high-quality education that prepares them for real-world success. Parents should be informed and empowered partners in their children's education — not sidelined by the system.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education Reform
Candidate campaign source
Every child deserves a safe, high-quality education that prepares them for real-world success. Parents should be informed and empowered partners in their children's education — not sidelined by the system.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Protect Parental Rights in EducationParents should have full access to curriculum information, school records, and decisions involving their children's education, safety, and wellbeing. Families deserve transparency and a meaningful voice in their child's education.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: EducationReform.
Candidate campaign source
Protect Parental Rights in EducationParents should have full access to curriculum information, school records, and decisions involving their children's education, safety, and wellbeing. Families deserve transparency and a meaningful voice in their child's education.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Colorado candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Colorado incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Colorado legislators and Colorado’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Colorado’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
74 matching sponsorships or proposals · 40 Colorado incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Andrew Boesenecker
Colorado House of Representatives, District 53 · D–CO
3 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Andrew BoeseneckerColorado Legislature · HB26-1144
Rep. Lindsay Gilchrist · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Sen. Tom Sullivan · Sponsored / Sen. Katie Wallace · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1144: Prohibit Three-Dimensional Printing Firearms & Components. Official enacted-bill summary: The act prohibits knowingly manufacturing or producing a potentially functioning firearm, unfinished frame or receiver, large-capacity magazine, or rapid-fire device (firearm or firearm component) by 3-dimensional printing. The prohibition does not apply to a federally licensed firearm manufacturer, an instructor or student of an accredited gunsmithing program, or an institution that operates an accredited gunsmithing program. Unlawful 3-dimensional printing of a firearm or firearm component is a class 1 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 5 felony. The prohibitions in the act only apply to potentially functional firearms and firearm components. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2026-05-04: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act prohibits knowingly manufacturing or producing a potentially functioning firearm, unfinished frame or receiver, large-capacity magazine, or rapid-fire device (firearm or firearm component) by 3-dimensional printing. The prohibition does not apply to a federally licensed firearm manufacturer, an instructor or student of an accredited gunsmithing program, or an institution that operates an accredited gunsmithing program. Unlawful 3-dimensional printing of a firearm or firearm component is a class 1 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 5 felony. The prohibitions in the act only apply to potentially functional firearms and firearm components. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Javier Mabrey · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored / Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1001: Housing Developments on Qualifying Properties. Official enacted-bill summary: A qualifying property is real property that contains no more than 5 acres of land and is owned by: A school district; A state college or university; A board of cooperative services; A housing authority; A local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties; A nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; or A nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property. If a subject jurisdiction requests, as part of an initial development application, that a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing provide documentation that the nonprofit meets required criteria, the nonprofit organization shall provide the documentation. A subject jurisdiction is not required to allow a residential development on a qualifying property if the subject jurisdiction implements a transferable development rights program on the qualifying property and if the transferable development rights program includes a policy for affordable resident housing that is restricted in ownership and occupancy in perpetuity.
2026-03-25: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A qualifying property is real property that contains no more than 5 acres of land and is owned by: A school district; A state college or university; A board of cooperative services; A housing authority; A local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties; A nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; or A nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property. If a subject jurisdiction requests, as part of an initial development application, that a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing provide documentation that the nonprofit meets required criteria, the nonprofit organization shall provide the documentation. A subject jurisdiction is not required to allow a residential development on a qualifying property if the subject jurisdiction implements a transferable development rights program on the qualifying property and if the transferable development rights program includes a policy for affordable resident housing that is restricted in ownership and occupancy in perpetuity.
Sen. Tom Sullivan · Sponsored / Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Rep. Meg Froelich · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of SB25-003: Semiautomatic Firearms & Rapid-Fire Devices. Official enacted-bill summary: The act defines a "specified semiautomatic firearm" as a semiautomatic rifle or semiautomatic shotgun with a detachable magazine or a gas-operated semiautomatic handgun with a detachable magazine. The act excludes certain types of firearms and specified models of firearms from the definition of "specified semiautomatic firearm". The act prohibits knowingly manufacturing, distributing, transferring, selling, or purchasing a specified semiautomatic firearm on or after August 1, 2026; except that a person may transfer a specified semiautomatic firearm to an individual residing in another state or a federally licensed firearm dealer. The act exempts certain manufacture, transfers, sales, and purchases from the prohibition, including specified transactions involving law enforcement agencies and peace officers, the department of corrections, armored vehicle businesses, military forces, gunsmiths, educational programs, and historical societies and museums; transfers that occur by operation of law or because of the death of a person; and conduct involving firearms for use solely as a prop for a film. Additionally, the prohibition does not apply to the transfer or sale of a specified semiautomatic firearm to, and receipt or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm by, a person who: Completed a hunter education course certified by the division of parks and wildlife (division) and, within 5 years before making the purchase, completed a basic firearms safety course; Within 5 years before making the purchase, completed an extended firearms safety course; or Completed an extended firearms safety course more than 5 years before making the purchase and completed a basic firearms safety course within 5 years before making the purchase. Unlawful manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm is a class 2 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 6 felony. The department of revenue shall revoke the state firearms dealer permit of a dealer who unlawfully manufactures, distributes, transfers, sells, or purchases a specified semiautomatic firearm.
2025-04-10: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act defines a "specified semiautomatic firearm" as a semiautomatic rifle or semiautomatic shotgun with a detachable magazine or a gas-operated semiautomatic handgun with a detachable magazine. The act excludes certain types of firearms and specified models of firearms from the definition of "specified semiautomatic firearm". The act prohibits knowingly manufacturing, distributing, transferring, selling, or purchasing a specified semiautomatic firearm on or after August 1, 2026; except that a person may transfer a specified semiautomatic firearm to an individual residing in another state or a federally licensed firearm dealer. The act exempts certain manufacture, transfers, sales, and purchases from the prohibition, including specified transactions involving law enforcement agencies and peace officers, the department of corrections, armored vehicle businesses, military forces, gunsmiths, educational programs, and historical societies and museums; transfers that occur by operation of law or because of the death of a person; and conduct involving firearms for use solely as a prop for a film. Additionally, the prohibition does not apply to the transfer or sale of a specified semiautomatic firearm to, and receipt or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm by, a person who: Completed a hunter education course certified by the division of parks and wildlife (division) and, within 5 years before making the purchase, completed a basic firearms safety course; Within 5 years before making the purchase, completed an extended firearms safety course; or Completed an extended firearms safety course more than 5 years before making the purchase and completed a basic firearms safety course within 5 years before making the purchase. Unlawful manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, or purchase of a specified semiautomatic firearm is a class 2 misdemeanor; except that a second or subsequent offense is a class 6 felony. The department of revenue shall revoke the state firearms dealer permit of a dealer who unlawfully manufactures, distributes, transfers, sells, or purchases a specified semiautomatic firearm.
Colorado House of Representatives, District 44 · R–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Anthony HartsookColorado Legislature · HB25-1192
Financial Literacy Graduation Requirement
May 23, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. Anthony Hartsook · Sponsored / Rep. Jennifer Bacon · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored / Sen. Lisa Frizell · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB25-1192: Financial Literacy Graduation Requirement. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires each school district board of education to incorporate all the financial literacy standards into a course that is required for high school graduation. The act authorizes the department of education (department) to seek, accept, and expend gifts, grants, or donations for the purpose of supporting educators in implementing a financial literacy course. For the 2025-26 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $210,389 to the department for distribution to school districts to support implementation of a financial literacy course and the ICAP requirement. The act requires the department to distribute money to school districts that do not currently offer a course based on a formula determined by the department, which may include determining eligibility based on attestations from school districts. For the 2025-26 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $9,611 to the department of higher education for use by the Colorado commission on higher education and higher education special purpose programs for administration. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2025-05-23: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Completion and equivalency programs address a component of attainment; rules for current students concern a potential future component of the adult population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act requires each school district board of education to incorporate all the financial literacy standards into a course that is required for high school graduation. The act authorizes the department of education (department) to seek, accept, and expend gifts, grants, or donations for the purpose of supporting educators in implementing a financial literacy course. For the 2025-26 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $210,389 to the department for distribution to school districts to support implementation of a financial literacy course and the ICAP requirement. The act requires the department to distribute money to school districts that do not currently offer a course based on a formula determined by the department, which may include determining eligibility based on attestations from school districts. For the 2025-26 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $9,611 to the department of higher education for use by the Colorado commission on higher education and higher education special purpose programs for administration. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Colorado House of Representatives, District 14 · R–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Ava FlanellColorado Legislature · HB26-1212
Constitutional Carry of Handgun
Apr 7, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Ava Flanell · Sponsored / Rep. Carlos Barron · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1212: Constitutional Carry of Handgun. Official proposal summary: The bill grants a person who is at least 18 years old and permitted to possess a handgun pursuant to federal and state law the same authority to carry a concealed handgun as a person who holds a permit to carry a concealed handgun (permit). A person who carries a concealed handgun without a permit has the same rights, limitations, and authority to carry as a person who holds a permit. A person may obtain a permit for the purpose of using the permit to carry a concealed handgun in another state that recognizes a Colorado permit. The bill makes 18 years old the minimum age to obtain a permit. Under existing law, Colorado recognizes permits issued in other states that meet certain criteria, including that the holder of the out-of-state permit is at least 21 years old. The bill changes the minimum age for recognition of an out-of-state permit to 18 years old. Under existing law, a permit is valid for 5 years. The bill makes a permit valid for the life of the permit holder. Existing permits, other than temporary emergency permits, are converted to lifetime permits. Because the bill makes permits valid for the life of the holder, the bill repeals provisions relating to the renewal of permits. The bill repeals the temporary emergency permit to carry a concealed handgun. The bill repeals local government authority to regulate open or concealed carry of a handgun, including repealing the authority of special districts and the governing boards of institutions of higher education, as applicable. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2026-04-07: House Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill grants a person who is at least 18 years old and permitted to possess a handgun pursuant to federal and state law the same authority to carry a concealed handgun as a person who holds a permit to carry a concealed handgun (permit). A person who carries a concealed handgun without a permit has the same rights, limitations, and authority to carry as a person who holds a permit. A person may obtain a permit for the purpose of using the permit to carry a concealed handgun in another state that recognizes a Colorado permit. The bill makes 18 years old the minimum age to obtain a permit. Under existing law, Colorado recognizes permits issued in other states that meet certain criteria, including that the holder of the out-of-state permit is at least 21 years old. The bill changes the minimum age for recognition of an out-of-state permit to 18 years old. Under existing law, a permit is valid for 5 years. The bill makes a permit valid for the life of the permit holder. Existing permits, other than temporary emergency permits, are converted to lifetime permits. Because the bill makes permits valid for the life of the holder, the bill repeals provisions relating to the renewal of permits. The bill repeals the temporary emergency permit to carry a concealed handgun. The bill repeals local government authority to regulate open or concealed carry of a handgun, including repealing the authority of special districts and the governing boards of institutions of higher education, as applicable. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Colorado House of Representatives, District 39 · R–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Brandi BradleyColorado Legislature · HB24-1123
Funding for School Safety Firearm Detection Systems
May 14, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Brandi Bradley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB24-1123: Funding for School Safety Firearm Detection Systems. Official proposal summary: The bill establishes the school safety firearm detection funding program (program) in the office of school safety (office) to disburse money to local education providers to purchase, install, and operate firearm detection software for use in schools. The office administers the program. In order to receive a disbursement, a local education provider must submit an application. The office shall disburse program money to eligible applicants in the order the applications are received. A recipient shall use program money to purchase and operate firearm detection software to detect, and alert local education provider personnel and first responders about, the presence of visible, unholstered firearms on school property. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2024-05-14: House Committee on Appropriations Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill establishes the school safety firearm detection funding program (program) in the office of school safety (office) to disburse money to local education providers to purchase, install, and operate firearm detection software for use in schools. The office administers the program. In order to receive a disbursement, a local education provider must submit an application. The office shall disburse program money to eligible applicants in the order the applications are received. A recipient shall use program money to purchase and operate firearm detection software to detect, and alert local education provider personnel and first responders about, the presence of visible, unholstered firearms on school property. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Prime sponsorship of SB19-085: Equal Pay For Equal Work Act. Official enacted-bill summary: The act allows exceptions to the prohibition against a wage differential based on sex if the employer demonstrates that a wage differential is not based on wage rate history and is based upon one or more of the following factors, so long as the employer applies the factors reasonably and they account for the entire wage rate differential: A seniority system; A merit system; A system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; The geographic location where the work is performed; Education, training, or experience to the extent that they are reasonably related to the work in question; or Travel, if the travel is a regular and necessary condition of the work performed. The act prohibits an employer from: Seeking the wage rate history of a prospective employee or requiring disclosure of wage rate as a condition of employment; Relying on a prior wage rate to determine a wage rate; Discriminating or retaliating against a prospective employee for failing to disclose the employee's wage rate history; Discharging or retaliating against an employee for actions by an employee asserting the rights established by the act against an employer; or Discharging, disciplining, discriminating against, or otherwise interfering with an employee for inquiring about, disclosing, or discussing the employee's wage rate. The act requires an employer to announce to all employees employment advancement opportunities and job openings and the pay range for the openings. The director is authorized to enforce actions against an employer concerning transparency in pay and employment opportunities, including fines of between $500 and $10,000 per violation. Employers are also required to maintain records of job descriptions and wage rate history for each employee while employed and for 2 years after the employment ends. Failure to maintain these records creates a rebuttable presumption, in a lawsuit alleging wage discrimination based on sex, that the records not maintained contained information favorable to the employee's claim. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
2019-05-22: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The act allows exceptions to the prohibition against a wage differential based on sex if the employer demonstrates that a wage differential is not based on wage rate history and is based upon one or more of the following factors, so long as the employer applies the factors reasonably and they account for the entire wage rate differential: A seniority system; A merit system; A system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; The geographic location where the work is performed; Education, training, or experience to the extent that they are reasonably related to the work in question; or Travel, if the travel is a regular and necessary condition of the work performed. The act prohibits an employer from: Seeking the wage rate history of a prospective employee or requiring disclosure of wage rate as a condition of employment; Relying on a prior wage rate to determine a wage rate; Discriminating or retaliating against a prospective employee for failing to disclose the employee's wage rate history; Discharging or retaliating against an employee for actions by an employee asserting the rights established by the act against an employer; or Discharging, disciplining, discriminating against, or otherwise interfering with an employee for inquiring about, disclosing, or discussing the employee's wage rate. The act requires an employer to announce to all employees employment advancement opportunities and job openings and the pay range for the openings. The director is authorized to enforce actions against an employer concerning transparency in pay and employment opportunities, including fines of between $500 and $10,000 per violation. Employers are also required to maintain records of job descriptions and wage rate history for each employee while employed and for 2 years after the employment ends. Failure to maintain these records creates a rebuttable presumption, in a lawsuit alleging wage discrimination based on sex, that the records not maintained contained information favorable to the employee's claim. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Colorado House of Representatives, District 48 · R–CO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Carlos BarronColorado Legislature · HB26-1212
Constitutional Carry of Handgun
Apr 7, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Ava Flanell · Sponsored / Rep. Carlos Barron · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prime sponsorship of HB26-1212: Constitutional Carry of Handgun. Official proposal summary: The bill grants a person who is at least 18 years old and permitted to possess a handgun pursuant to federal and state law the same authority to carry a concealed handgun as a person who holds a permit to carry a concealed handgun (permit). A person who carries a concealed handgun without a permit has the same rights, limitations, and authority to carry as a person who holds a permit. A person may obtain a permit for the purpose of using the permit to carry a concealed handgun in another state that recognizes a Colorado permit. The bill makes 18 years old the minimum age to obtain a permit. Under existing law, Colorado recognizes permits issued in other states that meet certain criteria, including that the holder of the out-of-state permit is at least 21 years old. The bill changes the minimum age for recognition of an out-of-state permit to 18 years old. Under existing law, a permit is valid for 5 years. The bill makes a permit valid for the life of the permit holder. Existing permits, other than temporary emergency permits, are converted to lifetime permits. Because the bill makes permits valid for the life of the holder, the bill repeals provisions relating to the renewal of permits. The bill repeals the temporary emergency permit to carry a concealed handgun. The bill repeals local government authority to regulate open or concealed carry of a handgun, including repealing the authority of special districts and the governing boards of institutions of higher education, as applicable. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
2026-04-07: House Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely. No enactment is established by this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill grants a person who is at least 18 years old and permitted to possess a handgun pursuant to federal and state law the same authority to carry a concealed handgun as a person who holds a permit to carry a concealed handgun (permit). A person who carries a concealed handgun without a permit has the same rights, limitations, and authority to carry as a person who holds a permit. A person may obtain a permit for the purpose of using the permit to carry a concealed handgun in another state that recognizes a Colorado permit. The bill makes 18 years old the minimum age to obtain a permit. Under existing law, Colorado recognizes permits issued in other states that meet certain criteria, including that the holder of the out-of-state permit is at least 21 years old. The bill changes the minimum age for recognition of an out-of-state permit to 18 years old. Under existing law, a permit is valid for 5 years. The bill makes a permit valid for the life of the permit holder. Existing permits, other than temporary emergency permits, are converted to lifetime permits. Because the bill makes permits valid for the life of the holder, the bill repeals provisions relating to the renewal of permits. The bill repeals the temporary emergency permit to carry a concealed handgun. The bill repeals local government authority to regulate open or concealed carry of a handgun, including repealing the authority of special districts and the governing boards of institutions of higher education, as applicable. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Only current Colorado officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Colorado statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Colorado snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Colorado, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.