Arkansas · individual fact

Arkansas health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages9.4%2024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 6511.4%2024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6562.9%2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first

Arkansas over time

Explore Arkansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arkansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arkansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arkansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Arkansas · source units
ArkansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 9.4%6.9%9.9%12.8%Arkansas, 2014: 11.8%Arkansas, 2015: 9.5%Arkansas, 2016: 7.9%Arkansas, 2017: 7.9%Arkansas, 2018: 8.2%Arkansas, 2019: 9.1%Arkansas, 2021: 9.2%Arkansas, 2022: 8.4%Arkansas, 2023: 8.9%Arkansas, 2024: 9.4%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Arkansas Legislature · 5● U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · 3◆ Governor · 5■ Arkansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-06-30

13 of 13 reviewed Arkansas actions match · 13 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

Arkansas · 2024: 9.4% · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Arkansas Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodArkansasRankU.S. benchmark
20249.4%#12 of 508.2%
20238.9%#14 of 50Not available
20228.4%#16 of 50Not available
20219.2%#17 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20199.1%#20 of 50Not available
20188.2%#23 of 50Not available
20177.9%#26 of 50Not available
20167.9%#27 of 50Not available
20159.5%#22 of 50Not available
201411.8%#21 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Arkansas · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Arkansas · 20249.4%
Arkansas rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Arkansas7.3%9.9%12.4%20142024
2024 · Arkansas: 9.4% · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodArkansasCompare
201411.8%
20159.5%
20167.9%
20177.9%
20188.2%
20199.1%
2020Not available
20219.2%
20228.4%
20238.9%
20249.4%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 9.4%2024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas · your comparison9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

11.4%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Arkansas’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
Arkansas · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Arkansas with every state.

Arkansas · 2020$9,338
Arkansas rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Arkansas$6.85K$8.74K$10.63K20142020
2020 · Arkansas: $9,338 · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodArkansasCompare
2014$7,284
2015$7,620
2016$8,079
2017$8,409
2018$8,545
2019$8,853
2020$9,338

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · $9,3382020 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas · your comparison$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Arkansas · 202273.9 years
Arkansas rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Arkansas population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Life expectancy at birth history in Arkansas71.8 years75 years78.3 years20182022
2022 · Arkansas: 73.9 years · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodArkansasCompare
201875.6 years
201975.7 years
202073.8 years
202172.5 years
202273.9 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 73.9 years2022 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas · your comparison73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Arkansas · 202313.1%
Arkansas rank#5among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arkansas
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Arkansas9.4%12.1%14.7%20192023
2023 · Arkansas: 13.1% · Rank #5 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arkansas Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodArkansasCompare
201912.3%
202011.9%
202111%
202214.1%
202313.1%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 13.1%2023 · Rank #5 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 12% – 14.3%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas · your comparison13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Arkansas · June 30, 202652.6%
Arkansas rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 52.6%June 30, 2026 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas · your comparison52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Arkansas · 2020$6,414
Arkansas rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · $6,4142020 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas · your comparison$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arkansas · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Arkansas · 2023–202426.6%
Arkansas rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arkansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arkansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arkansas · 26.6%2023–2024 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arkansas with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas · your comparison26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Arkansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

27 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Arkansas Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Fred Love

5 statements

Democratic · Governor · AR

Health coverage

No family should have to choose between getting care and paying their bills. Fred will protect Medicaid, expand access to maternal and mental health services across the state, and use telehealth to reach underserved and rural communities. He will ensure healthcare funding is focused on outcomes—not …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public Safety

Candidate campaign source

No family should have to choose between getting care and paying their bills. Fred will protect Medicaid, expand access to maternal and mental health services across the state, and use telehealth to reach underserved and rural communities. He will ensure healthcare funding is focused on outcomes—not bureaucracy—and launch a statewide mental health app and hotline to provide immediate support when it’s needed most.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Fred Love — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 4 more statements from Fred Love
Health coverage

Healthcare should be accessible, affordable, and available to every Arkansan.No family should have to choose between getting care and paying their bills. Fred will protect Medicaid, expand access to maternal and mental health services across the state, and use telehealth to reach underserved and rur…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and public health

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare should be accessible, affordable, and available to every Arkansan.No family should have to choose between getting care and paying their bills. Fred will protect Medicaid, expand access to maternal and mental health services across the state, and use telehealth to reach underserved and rural communities. He will ensure healthcare funding is focused on outcomes—not bureaucracy—and launch a statewide mental health app and hotline to provide immediate support when it’s needed most.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Fred Love — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Healthcare

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Real Solutions For Real Challenges

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Fred Love — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Education is the foundation of opportunity—and Fred’s life proves it.Fred believes every child deserves the same chance to succeed his teachers and mentors provided him, regardless of their zipcode. Fred will ensure every student reads on grade level by investing in literacy, providing the proper re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and public health

Candidate campaign source

Education is the foundation of opportunity—and Fred’s life proves it.Fred believes every child deserves the same chance to succeed his teachers and mentors provided him, regardless of their zipcode. Fred will ensure every student reads on grade level by investing in literacy, providing the proper resources, and strengthening early education. He will expand mental health support in schools, especially in rural areas, support teachers with fair pay and resources, and reject policies that divert funding away from public classrooms. Fred will also expand adult literacy programs so working families can build better futures.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Fred Love — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Healthcare should be accessible, affordable, and available to every Arkansan.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public Safety

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare should be accessible, affordable, and available to every Arkansan.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Fred Love — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Republican · Governor · AR

Care & public health

“I signed a law to protect you from out-of-control medical billing and rejected big insurance rate increases. Now, I’m fighting for healthcare price transparency to stop insurance companies from artificially inflating costs and empower you to choose the lowest price.”

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: “Lowest Price” (:30)

Candidate campaign source

“I signed a law to protect you from out-of-control medical billing and rejected big insurance rate increases. Now, I’m fighting for healthcare price transparency to stop insurance companies from artificially inflating costs and empower you to choose the lowest price.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Sarah Huckabee Sanders — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Sarah Huckabee Sanders
Care & public health

Healthcare Price Transparency

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 2026 Re-Election Record and Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare Price Transparency

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Sarah Huckabee Sanders — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Arkansas U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · AR

Care & public health

Expand access to affordable health care and reduce long travel distances for maternity care.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health Care

Candidate campaign source

Expand access to affordable health care and reduce long travel distances for maternity care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Terri Yarbrough Green — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from Terri Yarbrough Green
Care & public health

Accessible, affordable healthcare so getting sick does not mean going broke, and women don't have to travel hours for maternity care.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and public health

Candidate campaign source

Accessible, affordable healthcare so getting sick does not mean going broke, and women don't have to travel hours for maternity care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Terri Yarbrough Green — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Arkansas U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Chris Jones

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · AR

Care & public health

I believe we can create good jobs and keep hospitals open. We can support families with access to health care and food security. We can invest in schools, teachers, and apprenticeships that prepare people for the jobs of tomorrow. And we can strengthen trust in government with fair maps, just rules,…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

I believe we can create good jobs and keep hospitals open. We can support families with access to health care and food security. We can invest in schools, teachers, and apprenticeships that prepare people for the jobs of tomorrow. And we can strengthen trust in government with fair maps, just rules, and effective leaders that listen to the people, not billionaires.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Chris Jones — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Chris Jones
Care & public health

Every family deserves the chance to thrive. Stronger schools, a full range of comprehensive maternal health support, addiction support and recovery, and food security must be part of the foundation for healthy communities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and public health

Candidate campaign source

Every family deserves the chance to thrive. Stronger schools, a full range of comprehensive maternal health support, addiction support and recovery, and food security must be part of the foundation for healthy communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Chris Jones — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Care & public health

Expand access to quality, affordable healthcare and lowering out-of-pocket costs for individuals and working families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: WHAT I WILL DO:

Candidate campaign source

Expand access to quality, affordable healthcare and lowering out-of-pocket costs for individuals and working families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Chris Jones campaign source 4 ↗

French Hill

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · AR

Care & public health

To fight inflation and reduce everyday expenses, French introduced the Price Stability Act to lower costs on essentials like groceries and gasoline and to force the government to focus on reducing inflation. He also backed the Lower Healthcare Premiums for All Americans Act to reduce insurance costs…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: French on the Issues

Candidate campaign source

To fight inflation and reduce everyday expenses, French introduced the Price Stability Act to lower costs on essentials like groceries and gasoline and to force the government to focus on reducing inflation. He also backed the Lower Healthcare Premiums for All Americans Act to reduce insurance costs and make healthcare more affordable for working families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

French Hill — campaign source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arkansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Arkansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arkansas legislators and Arkansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arkansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

12 matching sponsorships or proposals · 12 Arkansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Bruce Westerman

U.S. House of Representatives, Arkansas District 4 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bruce Westerman
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · HR 8840

Fair Care Act of 2026

May 14, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Bruce Westerman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 403 of HR 8840 would let states contract out Medicaid eligibility determinations without incentives to delay or improperly deny eligibility. It would also permit eligibility redeterminations every six months or more frequently for the specified MAGI-based eligibility groups beginning October 1, 2026. This is a selected provision of a broad proposal, not an implemented Arkansas enrollment policy.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and Workforce, the Judiciary, Oversight and Government Reform, Rules, the Budget, Armed Services, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

403.Medicaid eligibility determinations (a)State flexibility To use contractors To make eligibility determinations on behalf of StateSection 1902(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(5)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon at the end the following: , but such determinations of eligibility may be made, at the option of a State, under a contract with another State or local agency or a contractor so long as the contract does not provide incentives for the agency or contractor to delay eligibility determinations or to deny eligibility for individuals otherwise eligible for medical assistance. (b)Frequency of eligibility redeterminationsSection 1902(e)(14) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(e)(14)) is amended by adding at the end the following: (L)Frequency of eligibility redeterminationsBeginning on October 1, 2026, and notwithstanding subparagraph (H), in the case of an individual whose eligibility for medical assistance under the State plan under this title (or a waiver of such plan) is determined based on the application of modified adjusted gross income under subparagraph (A) and who is so eligible on the basis of clause (i)(VIII), (ii)(XX), or (ii)(XXIII) of subsection (a)(10)(A), at the option of the State, the State plan may provide that the individual’s eligibility shall be redetermined every 6 months (or such shorter number of months as the State may elect)..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Cameron Cooper

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 57 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Cameron Cooper
Arkansas Legislature · HB 1313

AN ACT TO EXPAND HEALTH BENEFIT COVERAGE FOR CERTAIN FIREFIGHTER RETIREES OF MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Mar 25, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Cameron Cooper · Sponsored / Sen. Mark Johnson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1313 extends municipal and county health-plan participation to qualifying firefighter retirees and eligible dependents until Medicare eligibility. Covered firefighters must perform specified firefighting work, receive more than $5,000 in annual compensation and meet the act’s age/service and full-retirement-benefit requirements. Retirees must enroll within 60 calendar days after retirement and pay the premium or policy cost; declining that enrollment window ends further plan privileges. Specified dependent and surviving-spouse continuation rights remain. This concerns insurance continuity for a defined retiree population, not free coverage.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-03-25; Act 415 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. Arkansas Code § 14-1-110 is amended to read as follows: 14-1-110. Coverage for eligible police officer and firefighter retirees — Definitions. (a) As used in this section: (1) "County" means any county in this state; (2) "Dependent" means a participant or […] eligible retiree's: (A) Natural child, stepchild, or adopted child who is eligible for coverage under a plan of an eligible […] retiree; and (B) Spouse who is eligible for coverage under a plan of an eligible […] retiree; (3) "Eligible firefighter retiree" means a firefighter who is: (A) Employed as a firefighter; (B)(i) Eligible to retire with full retirement benefits under: (a) The Arkansas Local Police and Fire HB1313 2 01/29/2025 12:57:34 PM ANS126 Retirement System under § 24-10-101 et seq.; (b) A municipal or county retirement benefit system or plan for employees; (c) A local firemen's relief and pension fund under § 24-11-801 et seq.; or (d) The Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System under § 24-4-101 et seq. (ii) As used in this subdivision (a)(3)(B), “eligible to retire with full retirement benefits” means a firefighter who is: (a) Any age with twenty-eight (28) years of credited service; (b) At least fifty-five (55) years of age and has at least twenty (20) years of credited service; (c) At least sixty (60) years of age and has at least five (5) years of credited service; or (d) At least sixty (60) years of age and has at least ten (10) years of actual Arkansas Local Police and Fire Retirement System service credit; and (C) Not eligible for Medicare enrollment; (4) "Eligible retiree" means an eligible police officer retiree or an eligible firefighter retiree; (5) "Eligible police officer retiree" means a police officer who is: (A) Employed as a police officer; (B)(i) Eligible to retire with full retirement benefits under: (a) The Arkansas Local Police and Fire Retirement System under § 24-10-101 et seq.; (b) Any municipal or county retirement benefit system or plan for employees; (c) Any local policemen's pension and relief fund under § 24-11-101 et seq.; or (d) The Arkansas Public Employees' Retirement System under § 24-4-101 et seq. (ii) As used in this subdivision (a)(3)(B) HB1313 3 01/29/2025 12:57:34 PM ANS126 subdivision (a)(5)(B), "eligible to retire with full retirement benefits" means a police officer who is: (a) Any age with twenty-eight (28) years of credited service; (b) At least fifty-five (55) years of age and has at least twenty (20) years of credited service; (c) At least sixty (60) years of age and has at least five (5) years of credited service; or (d) At least sixty (60) years of age and has at least ten (10) years of actual Arkansas Local Police and Fire Retirement System service credit; and (C) Not eligible for Medicare enrollment; (6) "Firefighter" means a full-time or part-time paid member of a fire department or firefighting unit who: (A) Actively engages in fire suppression, rescue, pump operation, or other firefighting activity; and (B) Receives more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) in total compensation during the taxable year from the fire department or firefighting unit that the firefighter serves; (4)(7) "Health benefit plan" means a plan for health benefits offered by a municipality or county; (5)(8) "Municipality" means: (A) A city of the first class; (B) A city of the second class; or (C) An incorporated town; and (6)(9) "Police officer" means: (A) Any law enforcement officer engaged in official duty who is a member of any regular or auxiliary police force of a municipality or county on a full-time or part-time basis; (B) A sheriff or deputy sheriff of a county who is engaged in official duty; or (C) A constable or night marshal of a municipality engaged in official duty. (b)(1)(A) An eligible […] retiree may elect to participate in a health benefit plan after retirement. (B) The eligible […] retiree is eligible under HB1313 4 01/29/2025 12:57:34 PM ANS126 subdivision (b)(1)(A) of this section until the eligible […] retiree is a Medicare-eligible person. (C)(i) An eligible […] retiree shall have a guaranteed issue period of sixty (60) calendar days from the date of retirement to enroll in the health benefit plan. (ii) If the eligible […] retiree does not elect to participate or declines to participate in the health benefit plan upon the expiration of sixty (60) calendar days under subdivision (b)(1)(C)(i) of this section, the eligible […] retiree has no further privileges under the health benefit plan. (2) An eligible […] retiree who elects to participate in the health benefit plan shall pay a premium as determined by the municipality or county or the cost of the policy issued to the eligible […] retiree. (3) The eligible […] retiree portion of the premium shall be deducted from a bank account of the eligible […] retiree participant, to be paid by a monthly bank draft on the date designated by the municipality or county. (c) A dependent […] is eligible to participate in the health benefit plan. (d) An eligible […] retiree shall not be charged a surcharge or assessment to enroll in the health benefit plan. (e)(1) If an eligible […] retiree dies and has covered dependents at the time of death, the dependents have the right to continue to participate in the health benefit plan through the municipality or county. (2) Dependent children of a deceased eligible […] retiree may continue to participate in the health benefit plan until marriage or until the maximum age limit for a dependent child has been reached. (3) A surviving spouse of a deceased eligible police officer retiree or eligible firefighter retiree may continue to participate in the health benefit plan. (4) If a surviving spouse or dependent of a deceased eligible […] retiree declines to participate in the health benefit plan or cancels existing participation, then the surviving spouse or dependent has no further privileges under the health benefit plan.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. J. French Hill

U.S. House of Representatives, Arkansas District 2 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. J. French Hill
U.S. Congress · Arkansas delegation · HR 7253

Ticket to Work Advertisement Act

Jan 27, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. J. French Hill · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HR 7253 would require the Social Security Commissioner to send Ticket to Work participation information to disabled beneficiaries within one year of enactment and every six months thereafter. Ticket to Work serves qualifying disability beneficiaries, including Title II beneficiaries within OASDI and a separate SSI population. This is program outreach, not a benefit increase or a rule covering all retirees.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. The outreach concerns the Title II disability component of OASDI; the separately covered SSI population is outside this fact. It does not increase benefit amounts or cover every retiree. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Ticket to work program advertisementSection 1148(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–19(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:(8)Program advertisementNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this paragraph, and for each 6-month period thereafter, the Commissioner of Social Security shall disseminate to each disabled beneficiary information relating to participation in the Program..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Jimmy Gazaway

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 31 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jimmy Gazaway
Arkansas Legislature · HB 1551

AN ACT TO AMEND THE LAW CONCERNING CRIMINAL ABORTION; TO CREATE THE OFFENSE OF COERCED CRIMINAL ABORTION BY MEANS OF FRAUD; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 8, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Jimmy Gazaway · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1551 creates a Class B felony for knowingly giving or administering an abortion-inducing drug without a pregnant woman’s knowledge or consent for the purpose of causing an abortion. It excludes specified medicines used for other indications, contraception, emergency contraception, and methotrexate used for ectopic pregnancy. It concerns nonconsensual chemical abortion and does not explain the earlier reported occurrence count.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-08; Act 485 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts induced abortions reported as occurring in Arkansas in 2024, regardless of patient residence. It excludes abortions obtained by Arkansas residents outside the state. Regulation or reporting concerns these occurrences without establishing the effect of a particular policy. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Reported induced abortions occurring in Arkansas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

5-61-103. Coerced criminal abortion by means of fraud. (a) As used in this section: (1) "Abortion" means a chemical abortion as defined in § 20-16-26 2502; and (2)(A) "Abortion-inducing drug" means a medicine, drug, combination of drugs or chemicals, or any other substance used with the intent of causing an abortion including without limitation off-label use of drugs known to have abortion-inducing properties, such as mifepristone, RU-31 486, Mifeprex, Cytotec, misoprostol, and methotrexate. (B) "Abortion-inducing drug" does not include: (i) Drugs that may be known to increase the risk of miscarriage, but which are prescribed for other medical indications such as chemotherapeutic agents or diagnostic drugs; and As Engrossed: H3/12/25 S3/18/25 HB1551 2 03-18-2025 14:05:48 CEB022 (ii) Contraceptives, emergency contraceptives, or methotrexate when used to treat an ectopic pregnancy. (b) A person commits coerced criminal abortion by means of fraud if he or she knowingly administers or gives an abortion-inducing drug to a pregnant woman without her knowledge or consent with the purpose to cause an abortion. (c) A person who violates subsection (b) of this section upon conviction is guilty of a Class B felony. (d) A prosecution under this section does not prevent prosecution under another section if a person commits coerced criminal abortion by means of fraud and the use of an abortion-inducing drug causes the death or bodily injury of the pregnant woman or an unborn child.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Karilyn Brown

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 67 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Karilyn Brown
Arkansas Legislature · SB 591

AN ACT TO PROHIBIT RACE-SELECTION ABORTION IN THIS STATE; TO CREATE THE RACE DISCRIMINATION BY ABORTION PROHIBITION ACT; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Apr 22, 2025 · Enacted · Contingent effective date

Sen. Clint Penzo · Sponsored / Rep. Karilyn Brown · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 591 establishes a prohibition on abortions sought solely because of fetal race, associated inquiry and record-request duties, and criminal, civil and professional sanctions while excluding patient liability. Its effectiveness is expressly contingent on Attorney General certification of specified changes to, or injunctions against, Arkansas’s broader abortion restrictions. The signing does not establish that the trigger occurred or that the act is currently operative. The act’s abortion definition excludes acts intended to save the life or preserve the health of the pregnant woman or unborn child, remove a child who died through spontaneous abortion, or remove an ectopic pregnancy.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-04-22; Act 973 of 2025. Effectiveness requires the Attorney General certification specified in section 2; this review does not establish that the trigger occurred.

Why this record is included

The fact counts induced abortions reported as occurring in Arkansas in 2024, regardless of patient residence. It excludes abortions obtained by Arkansas residents outside the state. Regulation or reporting concerns these occurrences without establishing the effect of a particular policy. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Reported induced abortions occurring in Arkansas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

20-16-2602. Definitions. As used in this subchapter: (1)(A) “Abortion” means the act of using or prescribing any instrument, medicine, drug, or any other substance, device, or means with the intent to terminate the clinically diagnosable pregnancy of a woman, with knowledge that the termination by any of those means will with reasonable likelihood cause the death of the unborn child. As Engrossed: S4/9/25 SB591 2 04-09-2025 15:16:46 JMB381 (B) An act under subdivision (1)(A) of this section is not an abortion if the act is performed with the intent to: (i) Save the life or preserve the health of the unborn child or the pregnant woman; (ii) Remove a dead unborn child caused by spontaneous abortion; or (iii) Remove an ectopic pregnancy; (2) “Incompetent” means an individual who has been adjudicated as an individual with a disability and has had a guardian appointed for her; (3) “Minor” means an individual under eighteen (18) years of age; (4) “Physician” means a person licensed to practice medicine in this state, including a medical doctor and a doctor of osteopathy; (5) “Race-selection abortion” means an abortion performed solely on the basis of the race of the unborn child; (6) “Unborn child” means the offspring of human beings from conception until birth; and (7) “Viability” means the state of fetal development when, in the judgment of the physician based on the particular facts of the case before him or her and in light of the most advanced medical technology and information available to him or her, there is a reasonable likelihood of sustained survival of the unborn child outside the body of the mother, with or without artificial life support. 20-16-2603. Prohibition — Race-selection abortion. (a) A physician or other person shall not intentionally perform or attempt to perform an abortion with the knowledge that the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion solely on the basis of the race of the unborn child. (b) Before performing an abortion, the physician or other person who is performing the abortion shall: (1)(A) Ask the pregnant woman if she knows the race of the unborn child. (B) If the pregnant woman knows the race of the unborn child, the physician or other person who is performing the abortion shall inform the pregnant woman of the prohibition of abortion as a method of race selection for children; and As Engrossed: S4/9/25 SB591 3 04-09-2025 15:16:46 JMB381 (2)(A) Request the medical records of the pregnant woman relating directly to the entire pregnancy history of the woman. (B) An abortion shall not be performed until reasonable time and effort is spent to obtain the medical records of the pregnant woman as described in subdivision (b)(2)(A) of this section. (c) If this section is held invalid as applied to the period of pregnancy prior to viability, then the section shall remain applicable to the period of pregnancy subsequent to viability. 20-16-2604. Criminal penalties. A physician or other person who knowingly performs or attempts to perform an abortion prohibited by this subchapter is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. 20-16-2605. Civil penalties and professional sanctions. (a)(1) A physician or other person who knowingly violates this subchapter is liable for damages and shall have his or her medical license suspended or revoked as applicable. (2) The physician or other person may also be enjoined from future acts prohibited by this subchapter. (b)(1) A woman who receives an abortion in violation of this subchapter without being informed of the prohibition of abortion as a method of race selection for children, the parent or legal guardian of the woman if the woman is a minor who is not emancipated, or the legal guardian of the woman if the woman has been adjudicated incompetent, may commence a civil action for any reckless violation of this subchapter and may seek both actual and punitive damages. (2) Damages may include without limitation: (A) Money damages for all psychological and physical injuries occasioned by the violation of this subchapter; and (B) Statutory damages equal to ten (10) times the cost of the abortion performed in violation of this subchapter. (c) A physician or other person who performs an abortion in violation of this subchapter shall be considered to have engaged in unprofessional conduct for which his or her license to provide healthcare services in this state shall be suspended or revoked by the Arkansas State Medical Board. As Engrossed: S4/9/25 SB591 4 04-09-2025 15:16:46 JMB381 (d)(1) A cause of action for injunctive relief against any physician or other person who has knowingly violated this subchapter may be maintained by: (A) A person who is the spouse, parent, guardian, or current or former licensed healthcare provider of the woman who receives or attempts to receive an abortion in violation of this subchapter; or (B) The Attorney General. (2) The injunction shall prevent the physician or other person from performing further abortions in violation of this subchapter. 20-16-2606. Exclusion of liability for a woman who undergoes prohibited abortion. (a) A woman who receives or attempts to receive an abortion in violation of this subchapter shall not be prosecuted under this subchapter for conspiracy to violate this subchapter or otherwise be held criminally or civilly liable for any violation. (b) In a criminal proceeding or action brought under this subchapter, a woman who receives or attempts to receive an abortion in violation of this subchapter is entitled to all rights, protections, and notifications afforded to crime victims. (c)(1) In a civil proceeding or action brought under this subchapter, the anonymity of the woman who receives or attempts to receive the abortion in violation of this subchapter shall be preserved from public disclosure unless she gives her consent to disclosure. (2) A court of competent jurisdiction, upon motion or sua sponte, shall issue orders to the parties, witnesses, and counsel and direct the sealing of the record and exclusion of the individuals from the courtroom or hearing room to the extent necessary to safeguard the identity of the woman from public disclosure. (3) In the absence of written consent of the woman who receives or attempts to receive an abortion in violation of this subchapter, a person who initiates a proceeding or action under § 20-16-2605(b) or § 20-16-2605(d) shall do so under a pseudonym. 20-16-2607. Construction. (a) This subchapter shall not be construed as creating or recognizing As Engrossed: S4/9/25 SB591 5 04-09-2025 15:16:46 JMB381 a right to abortion. (b) It is not the intention of this subchapter to make lawful an abortion that is currently unlawful. 20-16-2608. Right of intervention. The General Assembly by joint resolution may appoint one (1) or more of its members who sponsored or cosponsored this subchapter in his or her official capacity to intervene as a matter of right in any case in which the constitutionality of this law is challenged. SECTION 2. Contingent effective date. This act shall become effective only upon the certification by the Attorney General that: (1) The State of Arkansas is enjoined from preventing a person from purposely performing or attempting to perform an abortion except to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency under Arkansas Human Life Protection Act, § 5-61-301 et seq., or the Arkansas Unborn Child Protection Act, § 5-61-401 et seq.; or (2) The Arkansas Human Life Protection Act, § 5-61-301 et seq., or the Arkansas Unborn Child Protection Act, § 5-61-401 et seq., have been repealed or amended in whole or in part to allow a person to purposely perform or attempt to perform an abortion except to save the life of a pregnant woman in a medical emergency.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. R. Scott Richardson

Arkansas House of Representatives, District 13 · R–AR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. R. Scott Richardson
Arkansas Legislature · HB 1117

AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE DIVISION OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION AND THE ARKANSAS STATE GAME AND FISH COMMISSION TO DETERMINE THE EARLIEST GRADE IN WHICH IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR STUDENTS TO RECEIVE INSTRUCTION ON FIREARM SAFETY; TO REQUIRE A PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT AND AN OPEN-ENROLLMENT PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL TO ANNUALLY PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH INSTRUCTION ON FIREARM SAFETY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Mar 4, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. R. Scott Richardson · Sponsored / Sen. Joshua Bryant · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1117 requires annual age-appropriate firearm-safety instruction in public schools and open-enrollment public charter schools beginning in 2025–2026. Education officials and the Game and Fish Commission determine the starting grade. Topics include unsecured firearms, safe handling and storage; off-campus live-fire or sporting activities require prior written parental approval. This concerns firearm-safety instruction, not diploma attainment or a demonstrated mortality effect.

Signed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders on 2025-03-04; Act 229 of 2025. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Arkansas evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

6-16-163. Instruction on firearm safety — Required. (a) It is the intent of the General Assembly to: (1) Protect Arkansas children from the accidental discharge of firearms by providing age-appropriate firearm education and instruction; and (2) Empower the Arkansas State Game and Fish Commission to work with the Division of Elementary and Secondary Education to create and approve age-appropriate firearm safety courses. (b)(1) The division, in consultation with the commission, shall As Engrossed: H1/28/25 H2/17/25 HB1117 2 02-17-2025 09:09:53 TNL036 determine the earliest grade in which it is appropriate for students enrolled in public school districts and open-enrollment public charter schools to begin receiving instruction on firearm safety. (2) In order to make the determination required under subdivision (a)(1) of this section, the division and the commission shall study relevant data and risk factors, including without limitation the earliest age at which: (A) Incidents of injury involving firearms are reported; and (B) Children are susceptible to harm from unsecured firearms that they are able to gain access to. (c) Beginning with the 2025-2026 school year, each public school district and open-enrollment public charter school shall annually provide students with age-appropriate and grade-appropriate instruction on firearm safety. (d) The curriculum or program of instruction used to educate students on firearm safety under subsection (b) of this section shall: (1) Be approved by the division; (2) Begin in the earliest appropriate grade as determined by the division and the commission under subsection (a) of this section and continue in each subsequent grade through grade twelve (12); (3) Include instruction on the following without limitation: (A) The steps to take if a student finds an unsecured firearm, including without limitation the importance of: (i) Avoiding injury if the student finds an unsecured firearm; (ii) Never touching a firearm if the student finds an unsecured firearm; and (iii) Immediately notifying an adult of the location of the unsecured firearm; (B) School safety relating to firearms; and (C) The proper handling and safe storage of firearms; and (4) Include neutral viewpoints on all included topics, including without limitation the prevention of accidental firearm injury. As Engrossed: H1/28/25 H2/17/25 HB1117 3 02-17-2025 09:09:53 TNL036 (e)(1) The division shall not approve a curriculum or program of instruction used to educate students on firearm safety if the curriculum, program of instruction, or any of the instructional materials used as part of the curriculum or program of instruction bear a brand or stated organizational affiliation. (2) However, curricula, programs of instruction, or any of the instructional materials used as part of the curricula or programs of instruction used to educate students on firearm safety may bear a brand issued by the State of Arkansas or any of its departments, agencies, or divisions. (f) The division shall use the following preferred methods of instruction in determining the curriculum or program of instruction used to educate students on firearm safety: (1) The viewing of a video produced by the commission or a commission-approved source; (2) The review of online resources and materials; and (3)(A) An alternative curriculum, which may include an off-campus, commission-approved firearm safety course. (B)(i) An off-campus, commission-approved firearm safety course may be provided in conjunction with a live-fire exercise or sporting event. (ii) If an off-campus, commission-approved firearm safety course is provided in conjunction with a live-fire exercise or sporting event, the provider of the off-campus, commission-approved firearm safety course and the public school district or open-enrollment public charter school in which the participating student is enrolled shall obtain prior written approval from the participating student's parent, legal guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to the participating student. (g) As used in this section, "firearm" means the same as defined in § 5-1-102.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Arkansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arkansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.