Arizona’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.
Real GDP$451.49B2025 · #16 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth1.5%2025 · #36 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$592.1B2025 · #15 of 50 · highest first
Arizona over time
Explore Arizona readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arizona officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arizona effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arizona change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Real GDP Arizona · source units
ArizonaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
0 of 0 reviewed Arizona actions match · 0 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.
Arizona · 2025: $451.49B · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T
Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Arizona · state comparison
Arizona output and growth
Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.
Arizona · 2025$451.49B
Arizona rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real GDP
Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.
Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2025 · Arizona: $451.49B · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Real GDP history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2014
$301.72B
2015
$308.58B
2016
$319.01B
2017
$333.1B
2018
$346.38B
2019
$359.53B
2020
$366.04B
2021
$397.88B
2022
$414.46B
2023
$427.79B
2024
$445.01B
2025
$451.49B
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · $451.49B2025 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
$3.43T
—
#2
Texas
$2.33T
—
#3
New York
$1.89T
—
#4
Florida
$1.38T
—
#5
Illinois
$948.03B
—
#6
Pennsylvania
$815.87B
—
#7
Ohio
$738.49B
—
#8
Georgia
$719.74B
—
#9
Washington
$715.88B
—
#10
New Jersey
$688.76B
—
#11
North Carolina
$682.83B
—
#12
Massachusetts
$640.79B
—
#13
Virginia
$631.98B
—
#14
Michigan
$575.4B
—
#15
Colorado
$452.78B
—
#16
Arizona · your comparison
$451.49B
—
#17
Tennessee
$447.66B
—
#18
Maryland
$437.37B
—
#19
Indiana
$422.47B
—
#20
Minnesota
$392.31B
—
#21
Wisconsin
$363.84B
—
#22
Missouri
$362.46B
—
#23
Connecticut
$297.35B
—
#24
South Carolina
$287.16B
—
#25
Oregon
$264.75B
—
#26
Louisiana
$263.89B
—
#27
Alabama
$259.46B
—
#28
Utah
$243.04B
—
#29
Kentucky
$239.51B
—
#30
Oklahoma
$216.31B
—
#31
Nevada
$210.1B
—
#32
Iowa
$204.86B
—
#33
Kansas
$178.51B
—
#34
Nebraska
$156.61B
—
#35
Arkansas
$147.93B
—
#36
Mississippi
$123.37B
—
#37
New Mexico
$122.58B
—
#38
Idaho
$103.62B
—
#39
New Hampshire
$99.06B
—
#40
Hawaii
$93.38B
—
#41
Delaware
$89.92B
—
#42
West Virginia
$84.94B
—
#43
Maine
$77.23B
—
#44
Rhode Island
$67.25B
—
#45
North Dakota
$65.27B
—
#46
Montana
$61.08B
—
#47
South Dakota
$59.87B
—
#48
Alaska
$56.34B
—
#49
Wyoming
$40.16B
—
#50
Vermont
$38.06B
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Choose an industry to compare Arizona’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.
Arizona · 2025$2.85B
Arizona rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output
Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.
A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2025 · Arizona: $2.85B · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2014
$2.01B
2015
$2.14B
2016
$2.41B
2017
$2.39B
2018
$2.26B
2019
$2.34B
2020
$1.81B
2021
$1.97B
2022
$3.22B
2023
$2.77B
2024
$2.65B
2025
$2.85B
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · $2.85B2025 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
$50.67B
—
#2
Texas
$16.95B
—
#3
Iowa
$14.1B
—
#4
Nebraska
$10.6B
—
#5
Illinois
$9.52B
—
#6
Florida
$8.33B
—
#7
Washington
$8.05B
—
#8
Minnesota
$8.01B
—
#9
Indiana
$7.13B
—
#10
South Dakota
$7.08B
—
#11
Kansas
$7.02B
—
#12
Ohio
$7B
—
#13
Wisconsin
$6.58B
—
#14
Oregon
$6.18B
—
#15
Michigan
$6.02B
—
#16
Missouri
$5.71B
—
#17
North Carolina
$5.55B
—
#18
Idaho
$5.41B
—
#19
Pennsylvania
$4.97B
—
#20
North Dakota
$4.71B
—
#21
Georgia
$4.53B
—
#22
Oklahoma
$4.26B
—
#23
Arkansas
$4.13B
—
#24
Kentucky
$3.75B
—
#25
New York
$3.55B
—
#26
Alabama
$3.29B
—
#27
Mississippi
$2.99B
—
#28
Colorado
$2.98B
—
#29
Arizona · your comparison
$2.85B
—
#30
Montana
$2.49B
—
#31
Louisiana
$2.42B
—
#32
Virginia
$2.37B
—
#33
Tennessee
$2.01B
—
#34
New Mexico
$1.7B
—
#35
South Carolina
$1.63B
—
#36
Utah
$1.59B
—
#37
Maryland
$1.31B
—
#38
New Jersey
$1.27B
—
#39
Maine
$1.2B
—
#40
Wyoming
$888.5M
—
#41
Massachusetts
$869.6M
—
#42
Delaware
$741.1M
—
#43
West Virginia
$561.8M
—
#44
Hawaii
$553.9M
—
#45
Nevada
$551.2M
—
#46
Vermont
$536.1M
—
#47
Alaska
$488.1M
—
#48
Connecticut
$341.8M
—
#49
New Hampshire
$320.1M
—
#50
Rhode Island
$164.2M
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.
Arizona · 20254,455,141
Arizona rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total employment · jobs
BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.
Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2025 · Arizona: 4,455,141 · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Total employment · jobs history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2014
3,448,367
2015
3,548,037
2016
3,645,341
2017
3,741,464
2018
3,855,707
2019
3,930,953
2020
3,921,652
2021
4,087,861
2022
4,253,360
2023
4,362,697
2024
4,446,462
2025
4,455,141
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 4,455,1412025 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
25,407,891
—
#2
Texas
20,639,097
—
#3
Florida
15,174,955
—
#4
New York
13,498,360
—
#5
Illinois
8,197,037
—
#6
Pennsylvania
8,150,272
—
#7
Ohio
7,394,537
—
#8
Georgia
7,184,433
—
#9
North Carolina
6,864,520
—
#10
New Jersey
6,095,348
—
#11
Michigan
5,946,187
—
#12
Virginia
5,789,397
—
#13
Massachusetts
5,020,627
—
#14
Washington
4,879,224
—
#15
Tennessee
4,633,711
—
#16
Arizona · your comparison
4,455,141
—
#17
Colorado
4,231,488
—
#18
Indiana
4,213,622
—
#19
Maryland
4,009,451
—
#20
Missouri
3,998,549
—
#21
Minnesota
3,914,167
—
#22
Wisconsin
3,855,203
—
#23
South Carolina
3,245,739
—
#24
Alabama
2,966,686
—
#25
Louisiana
2,831,737
—
#26
Kentucky
2,718,290
—
#27
Oregon
2,671,758
—
#28
Oklahoma
2,466,719
—
#29
Utah
2,458,247
—
#30
Connecticut
2,424,541
—
#31
Nevada
2,163,825
—
#32
Iowa
2,122,389
—
#33
Kansas
2,007,083
—
#34
Arkansas
1,811,561
—
#35
Mississippi
1,713,294
—
#36
Nebraska
1,410,465
—
#37
Idaho
1,238,642
—
#38
New Mexico
1,183,906
—
#39
New Hampshire
942,254
—
#40
Hawaii
925,451
—
#41
West Virginia
910,570
—
#42
Maine
898,379
—
#43
Montana
761,061
—
#44
Rhode Island
690,505
—
#45
Delaware
678,218
—
#46
South Dakota
665,420
—
#47
North Dakota
605,276
—
#48
Alaska
472,008
—
#49
Wyoming
451,906
—
#50
Vermont
439,349
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
0 of 0 reviewed Arizona actions · newest first
No reviewed actions match these filters.
How Arizona action records are selected
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Arizona officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Arizona candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
11 statements from 5 candidates
2026 Arizona Governor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Bring down costs for Arizona families and businesses by growing our economy, lowering taxes, encouraging job growth, and reducing government interference.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: READ THE BIGGS/KERR MAHA PLATFORM
Candidate campaign source
Bring down costs for Arizona families and businesses by growing our economy, lowering taxes, encouraging job growth, and reducing government interference.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Increase Funding For Education Without Raising Taxes Education is the foundation of opportunity for all Arizonans. A strong education system creates a strong workforce, fuels economic growth, and sustains a healthy, thriving democracy. Every Arizona student deserves access to a high-quality educatio…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Nick's Priorities
Candidate campaign source
Increase Funding For Education Without Raising Taxes Education is the foundation of opportunity for all Arizonans. A strong education system creates a strong workforce, fuels economic growth, and sustains a healthy, thriving democracy. Every Arizona student deserves access to a high-quality education, regardless of their zip code, background, or circumstances.We don’t invest enough in Arizona schools. That’s why Arizona continues to rank near the bottom nationally in per-student funding and overall education outcomes, reflecting years of underinvestment in our future. At the same time, our state is uniquely positioned with significant resources that should be working for our kids, our teachers, and our schools.Arizona owns approximately 9 million acres of trust land and maintains a $9.9 billion endowment fund dedicated to the benefit of education. Nick will approach these assets with a long-term, disciplined strategy, improving how they are managed so we can generate greater and more reliable funding for Arizona’s classrooms without raising taxes on families or businesses.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Education is the foundation of opportunity for all Arizonans. A strong education system creates a strong workforce, fuels economic growth, and sustains a healthy, thriving democracy. Every Arizona student deserves access to a high-quality education, regardless of their zip code, background, or circu…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Nick's Priorities
Candidate campaign source
Education is the foundation of opportunity for all Arizonans. A strong education system creates a strong workforce, fuels economic growth, and sustains a healthy, thriving democracy. Every Arizona student deserves access to a high-quality education, regardless of their zip code, background, or circumstances.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Create Good Jobs Growth and good jobs mean more opportunities for all Arizonans. The Treasurer plays a vital role in attracting and retaining new companies, creating jobs, and strengthening our small business ecosystem. Nick has built companies and created jobs, and will work with Arizona agencies t…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Nick's Priorities
Candidate campaign source
Create Good Jobs Growth and good jobs mean more opportunities for all Arizonans. The Treasurer plays a vital role in attracting and retaining new companies, creating jobs, and strengthening our small business ecosystem. Nick has built companies and created jobs, and will work with Arizona agencies to grow our economy in a long - term, sustainable way.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Growth and good jobs mean more opportunities for all Arizonans. The Treasurer plays a vital role in attracting and retaining new companies, creating jobs, and strengthening our small business ecosystem. Nick has built companies and created jobs, and will work with Arizona agencies to grow our econom…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Create Good Jobs
Candidate campaign source
Growth and good jobs mean more opportunities for all Arizonans. The Treasurer plays a vital role in attracting and retaining new companies, creating jobs, and strengthening our small business ecosystem. Nick has built companies and created jobs, and will work with Arizona agencies to grow our economy in a long - term, sustainable way.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arizona candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Arizona incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arizona legislators and Arizona’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arizona’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 Arizona incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us
Only current Arizona officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arizona statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Arizona snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Arizona, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.
