Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price14.91¢/kWh2024 · #25 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$4.727/gal2026-08 · #3 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$160.242024 · #9 of 50 · highest first
Arizona over time
Explore Arizona readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arizona officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arizona effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arizona change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Arizona · source units
ArizonaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
8 of 8 reviewed Arizona actions match · 5 date markers shown. 49 major events shown separately.
Arizona · 2024: 14.91¢/kWh · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Arizona, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Arizona Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Arizona · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Arizona · 202414.91¢/kWh
Arizona rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Arizona, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2024 · Arizona: 14.91¢/kWh · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Residential electricity price history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2015
12.13¢/kWh
2016
12.15¢/kWh
2017
12.44¢/kWh
2018
12.77¢/kWh
2019
12.43¢/kWh
2020
12.27¢/kWh
2021
12.54¢/kWh
2022
13.02¢/kWh
2023
14.02¢/kWh
2024
14.91¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 14.91¢/kWh2024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona · your comparison
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price
$4.82/galWeek of August 31, 2026
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations, including taxes, in EIA's West Coast petroleum district excluding California. The six-state region contains Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent weekly prices
Prior week
$4.776/gal
Weekly change
+4.7¢
One year earlier
$3.877/gal
Change from one year earlier
+94.6¢
Method and limitations
EIA does not publish a current Arizona statewide weekly gasoline-price series. FactVote therefore uses EIA's West Coast (PADD 5) Except California series as the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Arizona, displays the published dollars-per-gallon value, and calculates changes from the prior-week and nearest year-earlier weekly observations.
This is a six-state regional average, not an Arizona statewide gasoline-price estimate, and it is excluded from state rankings.
The regional average combines Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington and can mask substantial differences among those states, communities, and individual stations.
The nominal weekly price does not identify why prices changed or establish the effect of any tax, bill, executive action, fuel formulation, or market event.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Arizona · 2024$160.24
Arizona rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2024 · Arizona: $160.24 · Rank #9 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2010
$116.09
2011
$118.62
2012
$119.84
2013
$122.85
2014
$120.51
2015
$124.67
2016
$125.19
2017
$128.4
2018
$131.31
2019
$126.09
2020
$136.7
2021
$131.35
2022
$138.13
2023
$148.44
2024
$160.24
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · $160.242024 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona · your comparison
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Arizona · 2024121.5 TWh
Arizona rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Arizona, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2024 · Arizona: 121.5 TWh · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Total electricity generation history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2015
113.1 TWh
2016
108.8 TWh
2017
105.9 TWh
2018
111.9 TWh
2019
113.6 TWh
2020
109.3 TWh
2021
108.6 TWh
2022
104.7 TWh
2023
111.8 TWh
2024
121.5 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 121.5 TWh2024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona · your comparison
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation
47.5%2024
Natural-gas generation as a share of Arizona's total in-state electric-industry net generation.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
EIA generation totals
Natural-gas generation
55,089,930 MWh
Total net generation
116,026,511 MWh
Method and limitations
FactVote divides the 55,089,930 MWh of natural-gas generation in U.S. Energy Information Administration Table 5 by 116,026,511 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounds to one decimal place.
In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Arizona because power crosses state lines.
Electricity generation is only one part of total energy use, and the mix can change from year to year.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Arizona · 202483.6 min/year
Arizona rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2024 · Arizona: 83.6 min/year · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2023
103.8 min/year
2024
83.6 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 83.6 min/year2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona · your comparison
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Arizona · 2024413.7 trillion Btu
Arizona rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 413.7 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona · your comparison
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Arizona · 202482.2 Mt CO₂
Arizona rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 82.2 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona · your comparison
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
8 of 8 reviewed Arizona actions · newest first
Sep 4, 2026 · Current Arizona gasoline tax · Arizona gasoline fuel-tax rate · Current rate in effectArizona agencies · Current Arizona gasoline tax
ADOT's current fuel-tax guidance lists Arizona's gasoline tax at 18 cents per gallon.
Why this record is included
ADOT lists Arizona's gasoline tax at 18 cents per gallon. That tax is a direct Arizona component of tax-inclusive pump prices, but it does not set crude-oil, refining, distribution, or retail margins and does not govern the full six-state EIA regional average.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
ADOT's Fuel Tax Evasion Unit page states that Arizona's tax on gasoline, or motor vehicle fuel, is 18 cents per gallon and that Arizona does not regulate fuel prices.
HB 2986 extended the federal-approval window for Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline plan revisions through July 1, 2029.
Governor Katie Hobbs signed HB 2986 on June 19, 2026; the general effective date is September 12, 2026.
Why this record is included
Enacted HB 2986 extended to July 1, 2029 the conditional-enactment deadlines for state implementation plan revisions that include Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline changes. The law preserves time for federal approval of an alternative gasoline formulation; it does not itself approve the blend or establish a retail price.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official signed summary says HB 2986 extends State Implementation Plan revision conditional-enactment dates from July 1, 2027 to July 1, 2029; ADEQ identifies cleaner-burning gasoline revisions among the affected provisions.
HB 2400 would have created a recurring summer gasoline-tax holiday in designated Maricopa and Pinal County areas.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2400.
Why this record is included
HB 2400 would have suspended Arizona's 18-cent motor-vehicle-fuel tax from May through September in Area A and Area C and barred vendors there from adding or recovering that tax from consumers. It directly targeted a pump-price component but did not pass before the 2026 session ended.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official House summary says HB 2400 would suspend the motor-vehicle-fuel tax in Area A and Area C from May 1 to October 1 each year.
HB 2401 would have required recurring state reviews of alternative fuel formulations for the Phoenix and western Pinal County gasoline markets.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2401.
Why this record is included
HB 2401 would have required ADEQ to review available fuel formulations every two years, assess switching to formulations not then authorized in Area A or Area C, and report their expected air-quality effects and recommendations. The review could inform gasoline supply rules, but the bill would not itself authorize a new blend or set a retail price and did not pass.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official bill text requires biennial review of available fuel formulations and assessment of switching to formulations not authorized in Area A or Area C.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 13, 2026 · HB 2696 · commerce authority; gas; prices; prioritization · Did not passArizona Legislature · HB 2696
commerce authority; gas; prices; prioritization
Jun 13, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Julie Willoughby · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2696 would have studied Arizona fuel-supply resilience and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting the Senate-amended HB 2696.
Why this record is included
The Senate-amended HB 2696 would have directed a fuel-resiliency review covering refinery and storage capacity, supply stability, and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends. It addressed structural gasoline-supply questions but would not itself set pump prices, and it was not enacted before adjournment.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Official Arizona Legislature materials describe a fuel-resiliency task force and studies of refineries, storage capacity, supply stability, and alternative lower-production-cost fuel blends.
HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation and shortage-waiver rules, subject to federal approval.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2955.
Why this record is included
HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation standards in Area A and Area C and expanded supply-shortage waiver procedures, conditional on EPA approval by 2030. Those rules directly govern gasoline that may be sold in the Phoenix and western Pinal County markets, but the bill did not pass and would not have set retail prices.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official Senate fact sheet says HB 2955 would require ASTM D4814 gasoline from April through October in specified areas, revise supply-shortage waiver procedures, and take effect only with EPA approval.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Arizona officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Arizona candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
27 statements from 15 candidates
2026 Arizona Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Mayes takes on anyone who rips off Arizonans — and doesn't back down. Mayes fought to protect Arizonans from corporate price gouging, prosecuting corporate landlords for inflating housing costs and ending monopolistic tactics that raise prices on groceries and utilities. She's standing up to data ce…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Protecting Arizonans’ Freedoms
Candidate campaign source
Mayes takes on anyone who rips off Arizonans — and doesn't back down. Mayes fought to protect Arizonans from corporate price gouging, prosecuting corporate landlords for inflating housing costs and ending monopolistic tactics that raise prices on groceries and utilities. She's standing up to data centers driving up our utility bills. Mayes will keep fighting to keep us safe and make life more affordable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Lowering costs for Arizona families, seniors and veterans is Clara’s top priority. As a member of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Clara promises to fight for affordable residential utility bills, demand transparency and accountability from utility companies, ensure data centers pay their fair sh…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Utility affordability
Candidate campaign source
Lowering costs for Arizona families, seniors and veterans is Clara’s top priority. As a member of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Clara promises to fight for affordable residential utility bills, demand transparency and accountability from utility companies, ensure data centers pay their fair share, protect our precious water resources, advocate for rural and tribal communities and invest in Arizona’s energy future.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
For too long, Arizona Corporation Commissioners have served the interests of utility companies by allowing our electricity and water bills to skyrocket without better service, efficiency and cost justifications. They have also given special preference to high-demand users like data centers. Clara Pr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Protecting Your Family From Out-of-Control Costs
Candidate campaign source
For too long, Arizona Corporation Commissioners have served the interests of utility companies by allowing our electricity and water bills to skyrocket without better service, efficiency and cost justifications. They have also given special preference to high-demand users like data centers. Clara Pratte is dedicated to lowering utility costs for everyday Arizonans, creating jobs and expanding energy independence in our state. She believes it’s past time to restore integrity to the Arizona Corporation Commission and to put your best interests first.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
We need a forward-looking energy portfolio. By prioritizing low-cost, reliable, and water-saving energy sources like solar and battery storage, we can stabilize energy costs. I will champion energy efficiency and demand-management programs that directly lower monthly bills for households and local b…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Invest in Affordability & Reliability
Candidate campaign source
We need a forward-looking energy portfolio. By prioritizing low-cost, reliable, and water-saving energy sources like solar and battery storage, we can stabilize energy costs. I will champion energy efficiency and demand-management programs that directly lower monthly bills for households and local businesses.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Arizona families and small businesses are facing a persistent squeeze: utility bills are skyrocketing while water resources become scarcer and data center development accelerates—all while utility companies report record profits. The current Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) has failed to protect…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Jonathon’s Platform
Candidate campaign source
Arizona families and small businesses are facing a persistent squeeze: utility bills are skyrocketing while water resources become scarcer and data center development accelerates—all while utility companies report record profits. The current Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) has failed to protect the public, instead acting as a rubber stamp for rate increases and adopting expedited review systems that limit necessary oversight.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) is essentially Arizona’s "fourth branch of government." Composed of five state-elected officials, the ACC wears a few different hats that impact your daily life and wallet. Primarily, they regulate public utilities—setting the rates and ensuring the reliabili…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: What is the Arizona Corporation Commission?
Candidate campaign source
The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) is essentially Arizona’s "fourth branch of government." Composed of five state-elected officials, the ACC wears a few different hats that impact your daily life and wallet. Primarily, they regulate public utilities—setting the rates and ensuring the reliability of your electricity, gas, and water (excluding municipal utilities or SRP). But that’s not all: they are also the gatekeepers for Arizona businesses, handling all corporate registrations, protecting investors by regulating the local securities industry, and enforcing safety rules for the state’s railroads and pipelines.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Currently, I serve as Secretary of the Arizona Green Party. I am running for the Arizona Corporation Commission and as a Commissioner I will address some of the most compelling issues of our time: • I will move to immediately sanction Arizona companies complicit in the US/Israeli genocide of the Pal…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Currently, I serve as Secretary of the Arizona Green Party. I am running for the Arizona Corporation Commission and as a Commissioner I will address some of the most compelling issues of our time: • I will move to immediately sanction Arizona companies complicit in the US/Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people. • To address the climate crisis… • We will also sanction the mining companies destroying the Santa Rita’s, Oak Flat and other Native American sacred sites and polluting our groundwater. • I will target agri-business companies’ waste of our scarce water resources in the middle of mega drought in the desert southwest. • Companies exploiting people with high rental rates and evictions will be evaluated for fines and sanctions accordingly. • We will identify energy companies that are slow-walking transition to renewable energy while promoting fossil fuels. They will face restrictions, fines and sanctions. • Insurance companies will not be permitted to profit from human suffering. We will demand fair rates until we can implement universal healthcare. • Weapons companies supplying the Democrats and the Republicans the tools for a permanent war economy and wars for empire bringing us every day closer to nuclear war will be sanctioned.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Inflation / Cost of Living
Candidate campaign source
Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affor…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: State Corruption / Mismanagement
Candidate campaign source
Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Water & Energy Costs Water in Arizona is reaching a critical point right now that many in the public do not realize the real crisis happening. Arizona is needing to quickly, and immediately, implement a long term solution to water preservation as water in the Colorado River, Lake Powell, and Lake Me…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Teri's Agenda
Candidate campaign source
Water & Energy Costs Water in Arizona is reaching a critical point right now that many in the public do not realize the real crisis happening. Arizona is needing to quickly, and immediately, implement a long term solution to water preservation as water in the Colorado River, Lake Powell, and Lake Meade are reaching all time lows. Arizona is also part of the 7 state basin Colorado River plan but is the second to last of the states receiving the least. Lake Powell and Lake Meade are reducing in water annually at all time lows. Arizona cannot rely on these sources exclusively anymore and we need to address now what to do. I will put in emergency orders for water conservation in the state similar to other states such as Nevada who is one of the leading states in water conservation now. I will implement and review Nevada’s current water conservation methods to implement in Arizona as there are working blueprints in other states similar to Arizona that can work here. Nevada is a similar state as Arizona regarding the Colorado River crisis and similar weather and how they are creating long term solutions to reusing and conserving water and building conservation plants to have. Nevada states Nevada as a state is “drought resistant” with these plans in place. Arizona has reviewed plans for desalination water plants in Mexico and approval for 5.5 billion dollars was given for the plan to have water funneled through Mexico through systems and tunnels to Arizona in a desalination process. Following approval of this plan it was later dropped due to legislatures questioning the process through ecosystems that they believed could be harmed (despite the plant developers stating this will not occur) https://www.enr.com/articles/55659-arizona-advances-55b-mexico-desalination-plant-proposal. Now, Arizona is reviewing how to work with California to purchase more of their Colorado River water. One idea for this too, is that Arizona could help fund California’s current desalination plant as a short term solution in purchasing the Colorado River water while coming up with a plan for a long term solution in Arizona. The problem, I think, with Arizona purchasing water from California’s right to Colorado River water is this is not a long term solution but still a short term solution. We need plants for water conservation occurring in other states that supply their water outside of the Colorado River and other sources of water running low to supply Arizona long term. I will review where the 5.5 billion dollar fund approval is, why it stopped, and how to start a plan now to ensure water sustainability long term in Arizona. Fighting lawsuits for water conservation of depleting sources is not a long term solution either. I want Arizona to have its own plan outside of the other current conservation methods and plants operating that creates a "drought resistant” plan in Arizona, too. These plants can take up to 10-20 years, therefore, I will review short term plans such as buying colorado river from california while our current long term plan starts. Immediately these areas need to happen as Arizona is growing fast and our water cannot keep up with it. I will also address water through data center plants and ensure that data centers are paying taxes to build, have greater restriction on building, and review their water sources being used. Finally, I will immediately change the tax cuts to data centers making the data centers pay their way, have greater parameters to building, and energy resource use by the data centers paid by them to extend and/or operate. Expand interstates for corridor partnerships to ensure safe roads and safe actions..Incentivize efficiency upgrades: tax credits and/or rebates.Promote renewable energy: Develop solar and wind infrastructure to climate and energy.Ensure utility companies are not placing unnecessary costs onto the consumers.Support companies that complete energy audits for free or low cost.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arizona candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Arizona incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arizona legislators and Arizona’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arizona’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Arizona incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Gail Griffin
Arizona House of Representatives, District 19 · R–AZ
HB 2986 extended the federal-approval window for Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline plan revisions through July 1, 2029.
Governor Katie Hobbs signed HB 2986 on June 19, 2026; the general effective date is September 12, 2026.
Why this record is included
Enacted HB 2986 extended to July 1, 2029 the conditional-enactment deadlines for state implementation plan revisions that include Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline changes. The law preserves time for federal approval of an alternative gasoline formulation; it does not itself approve the blend or establish a retail price.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official signed summary says HB 2986 extends State Implementation Plan revision conditional-enactment dates from July 1, 2027 to July 1, 2029; ADEQ identifies cleaner-burning gasoline revisions among the affected provisions.
HB 2400 would have created a recurring summer gasoline-tax holiday in designated Maricopa and Pinal County areas.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2400.
Why this record is included
HB 2400 would have suspended Arizona's 18-cent motor-vehicle-fuel tax from May through September in Area A and Area C and barred vendors there from adding or recovering that tax from consumers. It directly targeted a pump-price component but did not pass before the 2026 session ended.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official House summary says HB 2400 would suspend the motor-vehicle-fuel tax in Area A and Area C from May 1 to October 1 each year.
HB 2401 would have required recurring state reviews of alternative fuel formulations for the Phoenix and western Pinal County gasoline markets.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2401.
Why this record is included
HB 2401 would have required ADEQ to review available fuel formulations every two years, assess switching to formulations not then authorized in Area A or Area C, and report their expected air-quality effects and recommendations. The review could inform gasoline supply rules, but the bill would not itself authorize a new blend or set a retail price and did not pass.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official bill text requires biennial review of available fuel formulations and assessment of switching to formulations not authorized in Area A or Area C.
HB 2696 would have studied Arizona fuel-supply resilience and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting the Senate-amended HB 2696.
Why this record is included
The Senate-amended HB 2696 would have directed a fuel-resiliency review covering refinery and storage capacity, supply stability, and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends. It addressed structural gasoline-supply questions but would not itself set pump prices, and it was not enacted before adjournment.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Official Arizona Legislature materials describe a fuel-resiliency task force and studies of refineries, storage capacity, supply stability, and alternative lower-production-cost fuel blends.
HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation and shortage-waiver rules, subject to federal approval.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2955.
Why this record is included
HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation standards in Area A and Area C and expanded supply-shortage waiver procedures, conditional on EPA approval by 2030. Those rules directly govern gasoline that may be sold in the Phoenix and western Pinal County markets, but the bill did not pass and would not have set retail prices.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official Senate fact sheet says HB 2955 would require ASTM D4814 gasoline from April through October in specified areas, revise supply-shortage waiver procedures, and take effect only with EPA approval.
Only current Arizona officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arizona statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Arizona snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Arizona, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.