Arizona · individual fact

Arizona energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price14.91¢/kWh2024 · #25 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$4.727/gal2026-08 · #3 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$160.242024 · #9 of 50 · highest first

Arizona over time

Explore Arizona readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arizona officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arizona effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arizona change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price Arizona · source units
ArizonaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 14.91¢/kWh11.13¢/kWh14.31¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhArizona, 2015: 12.13¢/kWhArizona, 2016: 12.15¢/kWhArizona, 2017: 12.44¢/kWhArizona, 2018: 12.77¢/kWhArizona, 2019: 12.43¢/kWhArizona, 2020: 12.27¢/kWhArizona, 2021: 12.54¢/kWhArizona, 2022: 13.02¢/kWhArizona, 2023: 14.02¢/kWhArizona, 2024: 14.91¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 49National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid reviewArizona · DOE selects Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. · SPARK selection● Arizona Legislature · 54● U.S. Congress · Arizona delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Arizona agencies · 32005-08-012026-09-30

8 of 8 reviewed Arizona actions match · 5 date markers shown. 49 major events shown separately.

Arizona · 2024: 14.91¢/kWh · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Arizona, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Arizona Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodArizonaRankU.S. benchmark
202414.91¢/kWh#25 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202314.02¢/kWh#28 of 50Not available
202213.02¢/kWh#33 of 50Not available
202112.54¢/kWh#26 of 50Not available
202012.27¢/kWh#27 of 50Not available
201912.43¢/kWh#25 of 50Not available
201812.77¢/kWh#18 of 50Not available
201712.44¢/kWh#24 of 50Not available
201612.15¢/kWh#22 of 50Not available
201512.13¢/kWh#23 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Arizona · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

Arizona · 202414.91¢/kWh
Arizona rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Arizona, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arizona
Residential electricity price history in Arizona11.48¢/kWh14.31¢/kWh17.13¢/kWh20152024
2024 · Arizona: 14.91¢/kWh · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arizona Residential electricity price history
PeriodArizonaCompare
201512.13¢/kWh
201612.15¢/kWh
201712.44¢/kWh
201812.77¢/kWh
201912.43¢/kWh
202012.27¢/kWh
202112.54¢/kWh
202213.02¢/kWh
202314.02¢/kWh
202414.91¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · 14.91¢/kWh2024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona · your comparison14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price

$4.82/galWeek of August 31, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations, including taxes, in EIA's West Coast petroleum district excluding California. The six-state region contains Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent weekly prices

Prior week
$4.776/gal
Weekly change
+4.7¢
One year earlier
$3.877/gal
Change from one year earlier
+94.6¢
Method and limitations

EIA does not publish a current Arizona statewide weekly gasoline-price series. FactVote therefore uses EIA's West Coast (PADD 5) Except California series as the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Arizona, displays the published dollars-per-gallon value, and calculates changes from the prior-week and nearest year-earlier weekly observations.

  • This is a six-state regional average, not an Arizona statewide gasoline-price estimate, and it is excluded from state rankings.
  • The regional average combines Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington and can mask substantial differences among those states, communities, and individual stations.
  • The nominal weekly price does not identify why prices changed or establish the effect of any tax, bill, executive action, fuel formulation, or market event.
Arizona · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

Arizona · 2024$160.24
Arizona rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arizona
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in Arizona$99.34$133.76$168.1820102024
2024 · Arizona: $160.24 · Rank #9 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arizona Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodArizonaCompare
2010$116.09
2011$118.62
2012$119.84
2013$122.85
2014$120.51
2015$124.67
2016$125.19
2017$128.4
2018$131.31
2019$126.09
2020$136.7
2021$131.35
2022$138.13
2023$148.44
2024$160.24

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · $160.242024 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona · your comparison$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arizona · state comparison

What generates Arizona electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

Arizona · 2024121.5 TWh
Arizona rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Arizona, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arizona
Total electricity generation history in Arizona102.2 TWh113.1 TWh124 TWh20152024
2024 · Arizona: 121.5 TWh · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arizona Total electricity generation history
PeriodArizonaCompare
2015113.1 TWh
2016108.8 TWh
2017105.9 TWh
2018111.9 TWh
2019113.6 TWh
2020109.3 TWh
2021108.6 TWh
2022104.7 TWh
2023111.8 TWh
2024121.5 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · 121.5 TWh2024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona · your comparison121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation

47.5%2024

Natural-gas generation as a share of Arizona's total in-state electric-industry net generation.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

EIA generation totals

Natural-gas generation
55,089,930 MWh
Total net generation
116,026,511 MWh
Method and limitations

FactVote divides the 55,089,930 MWh of natural-gas generation in U.S. Energy Information Administration Table 5 by 116,026,511 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounds to one decimal place.

  • In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Arizona because power crosses state lines.
  • Electricity generation is only one part of total energy use, and the mix can change from year to year.
Arizona · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

Arizona · 202483.6 min/year
Arizona rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arizona
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in Arizona-3.3 min/year373.1 min/year749.5 min/year20232024
2024 · Arizona: 83.6 min/year · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arizona Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodArizonaCompare
2023103.8 min/year
202483.6 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · 83.6 min/year2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona · your comparison83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arizona · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

Arizona · 2024413.7 trillion Btu
Arizona rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · 413.7 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona · your comparison413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arizona · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

Arizona · 202482.2 Mt CO₂
Arizona rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · 82.2 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona · your comparison82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Arizona candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

27 statements from 15 candidates

2026 Arizona Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Kris Mayes

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · AZ

Energy & electricity

Mayes takes on anyone who rips off Arizonans — and doesn't back down. Mayes fought to protect Arizonans from corporate price gouging, prosecuting corporate landlords for inflating housing costs and ending monopolistic tactics that raise prices on groceries and utilities. She's standing up to data ce…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Protecting Arizonans’ Freedoms

Candidate campaign source

Mayes takes on anyone who rips off Arizonans — and doesn't back down. Mayes fought to protect Arizonans from corporate price gouging, prosecuting corporate landlords for inflating housing costs and ending monopolistic tactics that raise prices on groceries and utilities. She's standing up to data centers driving up our utility bills. Mayes will keep fighting to keep us safe and make life more affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Kris Mayes campaign source 2 ↗

2026 Arizona Corporation Commissioner — 2 seats — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 10 statements

Clara Pratte

4 statements

Democratic · Corporation Commissioner · AZ

Energy & electricity

Lower Residential Utility Bills

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lower Bills, Secure Energy, Accountability

Candidate campaign source

Lower Residential Utility Bills

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Clara Pratte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Clara Pratte
Energy & electricity

Lowering costs for Arizona families, seniors and veterans is Clara’s top priority. As a member of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Clara promises to fight for affordable residential utility bills, demand transparency and accountability from utility companies, ensure data centers pay their fair sh…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Utility affordability

Candidate campaign source

Lowering costs for Arizona families, seniors and veterans is Clara’s top priority. As a member of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Clara promises to fight for affordable residential utility bills, demand transparency and accountability from utility companies, ensure data centers pay their fair share, protect our precious water resources, advocate for rural and tribal communities and invest in Arizona’s energy future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Clara Pratte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

For too long, Arizona Corporation Commissioners have served the interests of utility companies by allowing our electricity and water bills to skyrocket without better service, efficiency and cost justifications. They have also given special preference to high-demand users like data centers. Clara Pr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Protecting Your Family From Out-of-Control Costs

Candidate campaign source

For too long, Arizona Corporation Commissioners have served the interests of utility companies by allowing our electricity and water bills to skyrocket without better service, efficiency and cost justifications. They have also given special preference to high-demand users like data centers. Clara Pratte is dedicated to lowering utility costs for everyday Arizonans, creating jobs and expanding energy independence in our state. She believes it’s past time to restore integrity to the Arizona Corporation Commission and to put your best interests first.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Clara Pratte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

Expand Reliable Clean Energy

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lower Bills, Secure Energy, Accountability

Candidate campaign source

Expand Reliable Clean Energy

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Clara Pratte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Jonathon Hill

4 statements

Democratic · Corporation Commissioner · AZ

Energy & electricity

We need a forward-looking energy portfolio. By prioritizing low-cost, reliable, and water-saving energy sources like solar and battery storage, we can stabilize energy costs. I will champion energy efficiency and demand-management programs that directly lower monthly bills for households and local b…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Invest in Affordability & Reliability

Candidate campaign source

We need a forward-looking energy portfolio. By prioritizing low-cost, reliable, and water-saving energy sources like solar and battery storage, we can stabilize energy costs. I will champion energy efficiency and demand-management programs that directly lower monthly bills for households and local businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jonathon Hill — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Jonathon Hill
Energy & electricity

Arizona families and small businesses are facing a persistent squeeze: utility bills are skyrocketing while water resources become scarcer and data center development accelerates—all while utility companies report record profits. The current Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) has failed to protect…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Jonathon’s Platform

Candidate campaign source

Arizona families and small businesses are facing a persistent squeeze: utility bills are skyrocketing while water resources become scarcer and data center development accelerates—all while utility companies report record profits. The current Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) has failed to protect the public, instead acting as a rubber stamp for rate increases and adopting expedited review systems that limit necessary oversight.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jonathon Hill — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) is essentially Arizona’s "fourth branch of government." Composed of five state-elected officials, the ACC wears a few different hats that impact your daily life and wallet. Primarily, they regulate public utilities—setting the rates and ensuring the reliabili…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: What is the Arizona Corporation Commission?

Candidate campaign source

The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) is essentially Arizona’s "fourth branch of government." Composed of five state-elected officials, the ACC wears a few different hats that impact your daily life and wallet. Primarily, they regulate public utilities—setting the rates and ensuring the reliability of your electricity, gas, and water (excluding municipal utilities or SRP). But that’s not all: they are also the gatekeepers for Arizona businesses, handling all corporate registrations, protecting investors by regulating the local securities industry, and enforcing safety rules for the state’s railroads and pipelines.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jonathon Hill — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Energy & electricity

Lower Utility Bills for Arizona Families, Schools, and Local Businesses

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lower Utility Bills for Arizona Families, Schools, and Local Businesses

Candidate campaign source

Lower Utility Bills for Arizona Families, Schools, and Local Businesses

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jonathon Hill — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Kevin Thompson

1 statement

Republican · Corporation Commissioner · AZ

Energy & electricity

Protections to shield consumers from cost shifts from community solar

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Utility affordability and Commission management

Candidate campaign source

Protections to shield consumers from cost shifts from community solar

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kevin Thompson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Mike Cease

1 statement

Green · Corporation Commissioner · AZ

Energy & electricity

Currently, I serve as Secretary of the Arizona Green Party. I am running for the Arizona Corporation Commission and as a Commissioner I will address some of the most compelling issues of our time: • I will move to immediately sanction Arizona companies complicit in the US/Israeli genocide of the Pal…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Currently, I serve as Secretary of the Arizona Green Party. I am running for the Arizona Corporation Commission and as a Commissioner I will address some of the most compelling issues of our time: • I will move to immediately sanction Arizona companies complicit in the US/Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people. • To address the climate crisis… • We will also sanction the mining companies destroying the Santa Rita’s, Oak Flat and other Native American sacred sites and polluting our groundwater. • I will target agri-business companies’ waste of our scarce water resources in the middle of mega drought in the desert southwest. • Companies exploiting people with high rental rates and evictions will be evaluated for fines and sanctions accordingly. • We will identify energy companies that are slow-walking transition to renewable energy while promoting fossil fuels. They will face restrictions, fines and sanctions. • Insurance companies will not be permitted to profit from human suffering. We will demand fair rates until we can implement universal healthcare. • Weapons companies supplying the Democrats and the Republicans the tools for a permanent war economy and wars for empire bringing us every day closer to nuclear war will be sanctioned.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

2026 Arizona candidate-submitted statement — Mike Cease ↗

2026 Arizona Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Andy Biggs

1 statement

Republican · Governor · AZ

Energy & electricity

Prioritize the use and expansion of reliable and affordable energy sources to reduce rising utility costs and gas prices for every Arizonan.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Support Andy Biggs

Candidate campaign source

Prioritize the use and expansion of reliable and affordable energy sources to reduce rising utility costs and gas prices for every Arizonan.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Andy Biggs — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Teri Ann Hourihan

4 statements

No Labels · Governor · AZ

Energy & electricity

Promote renewable energy: Develop solar and wind infrastructure to climate and energy.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Develop solar and wind

Candidate campaign source

Promote renewable energy: Develop solar and wind infrastructure to climate and energy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
View 3 more statements from Teri Ann Hourihan
Energy & electricity

Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Inflation / Cost of Living

Candidate campaign source

Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Energy & electricity

Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affor…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: State Corruption / Mismanagement

Candidate campaign source

Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Energy & electricity

Water & Energy Costs Water in Arizona is reaching a critical point right now that many in the public do not realize the real crisis happening. Arizona is needing to quickly, and immediately, implement a long term solution to water preservation as water in the Colorado River, Lake Powell, and Lake Me…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Teri's Agenda

Candidate campaign source

Water & Energy Costs Water in Arizona is reaching a critical point right now that many in the public do not realize the real crisis happening. Arizona is needing to quickly, and immediately, implement a long term solution to water preservation as water in the Colorado River, Lake Powell, and Lake Meade are reaching all time lows. Arizona is also part of the 7 state basin Colorado River plan but is the second to last of the states receiving the least. Lake Powell and Lake Meade are reducing in water annually at all time lows. Arizona cannot rely on these sources exclusively anymore and we need to address now what to do. I will put in emergency orders for water conservation in the state similar to other states such as Nevada who is one of the leading states in water conservation now. I will implement and review Nevada’s current water conservation methods to implement in Arizona as there are working blueprints in other states similar to Arizona that can work here. Nevada is a similar state as Arizona regarding the Colorado River crisis and similar weather and how they are creating long term solutions to reusing and conserving water and building conservation plants to have. Nevada states Nevada as a state is “drought resistant” with these plans in place. Arizona has reviewed plans for desalination water plants in Mexico and approval for 5.5 billion dollars was given for the plan to have water funneled through Mexico through systems and tunnels to Arizona in a desalination process. Following approval of this plan it was later dropped due to legislatures questioning the process through ecosystems that they believed could be harmed (despite the plant developers stating this will not occur) https://www.enr.com/articles/55659-arizona-advances-55b-mexico-desalination-plant-proposal. Now, Arizona is reviewing how to work with California to purchase more of their Colorado River water. One idea for this too, is that Arizona could help fund California’s current desalination plant as a short term solution in purchasing the Colorado River water while coming up with a plan for a long term solution in Arizona. The problem, I think, with Arizona purchasing water from California’s right to Colorado River water is this is not a long term solution but still a short term solution. We need plants for water conservation occurring in other states that supply their water outside of the Colorado River and other sources of water running low to supply Arizona long term. I will review where the 5.5 billion dollar fund approval is, why it stopped, and how to start a plan now to ensure water sustainability long term in Arizona. Fighting lawsuits for water conservation of depleting sources is not a long term solution either. I want Arizona to have its own plan outside of the other current conservation methods and plants operating that creates a "drought resistant” plan in Arizona, too. These plants can take up to 10-20 years, therefore, I will review short term plans such as buying colorado river from california while our current long term plan starts. Immediately these areas need to happen as Arizona is growing fast and our water cannot keep up with it. I will also address water through data center plants and ensure that data centers are paying taxes to build, have greater restriction on building, and review their water sources being used. Finally, I will immediately change the tax cuts to data centers making the data centers pay their way, have greater parameters to building, and energy resource use by the data centers paid by them to extend and/or operate. Expand interstates for corridor partnerships to ensure safe roads and safe actions..Incentivize efficiency upgrades: tax credits and/or rebates.Promote renewable energy: Develop solar and wind infrastructure to climate and energy.Ensure utility companies are not placing unnecessary costs onto the consumers.Support companies that complete energy audits for free or low cost.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arizona candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Arizona incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arizona legislators and Arizona’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arizona’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Arizona incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Gail Griffin

Arizona House of Representatives, District 19 · R–AZ

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Gail Griffin
Arizona Legislature · HB 2986

department of environmental quality; programs

Jun 19, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Gail Griffin · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2986 extended the federal-approval window for Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline plan revisions through July 1, 2029.

Governor Katie Hobbs signed HB 2986 on June 19, 2026; the general effective date is September 12, 2026.

Why this record is included

Enacted HB 2986 extended to July 1, 2029 the conditional-enactment deadlines for state implementation plan revisions that include Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline changes. The law preserves time for federal approval of an alternative gasoline formulation; it does not itself approve the blend or establish a retail price.

Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The official signed summary says HB 2986 extends State Implementation Plan revision conditional-enactment dates from July 1, 2027 to July 1, 2029; ADEQ identifies cleaner-burning gasoline revisions among the affected provisions.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Julie Willoughby

Arizona House of Representatives, District 13 · R–AZ

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Julie Willoughby
Arizona Legislature · HB 2400

motor fuel tax holiday

Jun 13, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Julie Willoughby · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2400 would have created a recurring summer gasoline-tax holiday in designated Maricopa and Pinal County areas.

The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2400.

Why this record is included

HB 2400 would have suspended Arizona's 18-cent motor-vehicle-fuel tax from May through September in Area A and Area C and barred vendors there from adding or recovering that tax from consumers. It directly targeted a pump-price component but did not pass before the 2026 session ended.

Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The official House summary says HB 2400 would suspend the motor-vehicle-fuel tax in Area A and Area C from May 1 to October 1 each year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Arizona Legislature · HB 2401

fuel formulations; biennial review

Jun 13, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Julie Willoughby · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2401 would have required recurring state reviews of alternative fuel formulations for the Phoenix and western Pinal County gasoline markets.

The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2401.

Why this record is included

HB 2401 would have required ADEQ to review available fuel formulations every two years, assess switching to formulations not then authorized in Area A or Area C, and report their expected air-quality effects and recommendations. The review could inform gasoline supply rules, but the bill would not itself authorize a new blend or set a retail price and did not pass.

Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The official bill text requires biennial review of available fuel formulations and assessment of switching to formulations not authorized in Area A or Area C.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Arizona Legislature · HB 2696

commerce authority; gas; prices; prioritization

Jun 13, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Julie Willoughby · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2696 would have studied Arizona fuel-supply resilience and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends.

The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting the Senate-amended HB 2696.

Why this record is included

The Senate-amended HB 2696 would have directed a fuel-resiliency review covering refinery and storage capacity, supply stability, and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends. It addressed structural gasoline-supply questions but would not itself set pump prices, and it was not enacted before adjournment.

Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Official Arizona Legislature materials describe a fuel-resiliency task force and studies of refineries, storage capacity, supply stability, and alternative lower-production-cost fuel blends.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Arizona Legislature · HB 2955

gasoline formulations; air quality

Jun 13, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Julie Willoughby · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation and shortage-waiver rules, subject to federal approval.

The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2955.

Why this record is included

HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation standards in Area A and Area C and expanded supply-shortage waiver procedures, conditional on EPA approval by 2030. Those rules directly govern gasoline that may be sold in the Phoenix and western Pinal County markets, but the bill did not pass and would not have set retail prices.

Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The official Senate fact sheet says HB 2955 would require ASTM D4814 gasoline from April through October in specified areas, revise supply-shortage waiver procedures, and take effect only with EPA approval.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Arizona officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arizona statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.