Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.
High school or higher89.4%2020–2024 · #38 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher42.6%2020–2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher33.3%2020–2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Arizona over time
Explore Arizona readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arizona officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arizona effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arizona change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Grade 4 reading Arizona · source units
ArizonaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
20 of 20 reviewed Arizona actions match · 18 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.
Arizona · 2024: 208.1 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Arizona. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Arizona · state comparison
Adult educational attainment
Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.
Arizona · 2020–202489.4%
Arizona rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
High school or higher
Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.
Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 89.4%2020–2024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
94.9%
—
#2
Maine
94.8%
—
#3
Montana
94.6%
—
#4
New Hampshire
94.4%
—
#5
Wyoming
94.2%
—
#6
North Dakota
94%
—
#7
Minnesota
93.9%
—
#8
Wisconsin
93.6%
—
#9
Alaska
93.6%
—
#10
Utah
93.4%
—
#11
Iowa
93.3%
—
#12
South Dakota
93.2%
—
#13
Hawaii
93.2%
—
#14
Colorado
92.9%
—
#15
Washington
92.3%
—
#16
Nebraska
92.2%
—
#17
Pennsylvania
92.1%
—
#18
Michigan
92.1%
—
#19
Kansas
92%
—
#20
Idaho
91.9%
—
#21
Missouri
91.9%
—
#22
Oregon
91.8%
—
#23
Ohio
91.8%
—
#24
Delaware
91.7%
—
#25
Virginia
91.6%
—
#26
Connecticut
91.5%
—
#27
Massachusetts
91.4%
—
#28
Maryland
91.1%
—
#29
New Jersey
90.7%
—
#30
Illinois
90.5%
—
#31
Indiana
90.4%
—
#32
North Carolina
90.1%
—
#33
South Carolina
90.1%
—
#34
Tennessee
90%
—
#35
Florida
89.9%
—
#36
Rhode Island
89.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
89.4%
—
#38
Arizona · your comparison
89.4%
—
#39
West Virginia
89.3%
—
#40
Georgia
89.2%
—
#41
Kentucky
88.9%
—
#42
Arkansas
88.7%
—
#43
Alabama
88.6%
—
#44
New Mexico
88%
—
#45
New York
88%
—
#46
Nevada
87.5%
—
#47
Louisiana
87.3%
—
#48
Mississippi
87.1%
—
#49
Texas
86%
—
#50
California
84.7%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Arizona residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.
This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.
Arizona · 2024208.1
Arizona rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Grade 4 reading
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Arizona. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.
NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2024 · Arizona: 208.1 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Grade 4 reading history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2003
208.9
2005
207.1
2007
209.5
2009
210
2011
212.4
2013
213.1
2015
215.3
2017
215.5
2019
215.8
2022
215.5
2024
208.1
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 208.12024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Massachusetts
224.8
—
#2
Wyoming
221.9
—
#3
New Jersey
221.6
—
#4
New Hampshire
221.5
—
#5
Colorado
220.9
—
#6
Indiana
220.1
—
#7
Utah
219.3
—
#8
Connecticut
219.2
—
#9
Mississippi
218.5
—
#10
Florida
218.2
—
#11
Kentucky
218
—
#12
Montana
217.2
—
#13
Rhode Island
216.3
—
#14
Louisiana
216
—
#14
Ohio
216
—
#16
Hawaii
215.8
—
#16
Pennsylvania
215.8
—
#18
Idaho
215.7
—
#18
Washington
215.7
—
#20
Maryland
215.6
—
#21
North Dakota
215.5
—
#22
Wisconsin
215.3
—
#23
Tennessee
215.1
—
#24
South Carolina
214.9
—
#25
Iowa
214.6
—
#25
New York
214.6
—
#27
Georgia
214.4
—
#27
Minnesota
214.4
—
#29
Illinois
214.2
—
#30
South Dakota
214.1
—
#30
Virginia
214.1
—
#32
North Carolina
213.4
—
#33
Alabama
213.2
—
#34
Kansas
213.1
—
#34
Nevada
213.1
—
#36
Vermont
212.7
—
#37
Missouri
211.9
—
#37
Texas
211.9
—
#39
California
211.7
—
#39
Nebraska
211.7
—
#41
Arkansas
209.7
—
#42
Maine
209.6
—
#43
Delaware
209.5
—
#44
Michigan
209.1
—
#45
Arizona · your comparison
208.1
—
#46
Oklahoma
207.3
—
#47
Oregon
207
—
#48
West Virginia
205.9
—
#49
Alaska
201.6
—
#50
New Mexico
200.6
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.
Arizona · FY2024$12,003
Arizona rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current spending per pupil
Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.
Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · $12,003FY2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$31,918
—
#2
Vermont
$28,818
—
#3
New Jersey
$27,234
—
#4
Connecticut
$26,316
—
#5
Massachusetts
$24,429
—
#6
Hawaii
$23,878
—
#7
New Hampshire
$22,978
—
#8
Delaware
$22,201
—
#9
Rhode Island
$22,110
—
#10
Illinois
$21,776
—
#11
Pennsylvania
$21,091
—
#12
Alaska
$21,004
—
#13
California
$20,791
—
#14
Wyoming
$20,521
—
#15
Maryland
$20,208
—
#16
Maine
$19,962
—
#17
Washington
$18,564
—
#18
Michigan
$18,314
—
#19
Oregon
$18,083
—
#20
New Mexico
$17,664
—
#21
Ohio
$17,257
—
#22
Virginia
$17,104
—
#23
North Dakota
$17,102
—
#24
Minnesota
$17,098
—
#25
Nebraska
$16,147
—
#26
Wisconsin
$15,952
—
#27
Colorado
$15,908
—
#28
Georgia
$15,833
—
#29
West Virginia
$15,640
—
#30
Louisiana
$15,581
—
#31
Kansas
$15,558
—
#32
South Carolina
$15,060
—
#33
Nevada
$14,812
—
#34
Kentucky
$14,596
—
#35
Iowa
$14,369
—
#36
Missouri
$14,241
—
#37
Arkansas
$13,873
—
#38
Montana
$13,656
—
#39
Alabama
$13,627
—
#40
Indiana
$13,622
—
#41
North Carolina
$12,995
—
#42
Texas
$12,895
—
#43
Tennessee
$12,882
—
#44
South Dakota
$12,828
—
#45
Florida
$12,693
—
#46
Mississippi
$12,324
—
#47
Oklahoma
$12,162
—
#48
Arizona · your comparison
$12,003
—
#49
Utah
$11,347
—
#50
Idaho
$11,060
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.
Arizona · 2021–2277%
Arizona rank#48among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate
Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.
Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2021–22 · Arizona: 77% · Rank #48 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2011–12
76%
2012–13
75%
2013–14
76%
2014–15
77%
2015–16
80%
2016–17
78%
2017–18
79%
2018–19
78%
2019–20
77%
2020–21
76%
2021–22
77%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 77%2021–22 · Rank #48 of 48, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
West Virginia
91%
—
#2
Iowa
90%
—
#2
Kentucky
90%
—
#2
Massachusetts
90%
—
#2
Missouri
90%
—
#2
Tennessee
90%
—
#2
Texas
90%
—
#2
Wisconsin
90%
—
#9
Connecticut
89%
—
#9
Kansas
89%
—
#9
Mississippi
89%
—
#9
Virginia
89%
—
#13
Alabama
88%
—
#13
Arkansas
88%
—
#13
Delaware
88%
—
#13
Indiana
88%
—
#13
New Hampshire
88%
—
#13
Utah
88%
—
#19
California
87%
—
#19
Florida
87%
—
#19
Illinois
87%
—
#19
Nebraska
87%
—
#19
New York
87%
—
#19
Pennsylvania
87%
—
#25
Hawaii
86%
—
#25
Maine
86%
—
#25
Maryland
86%
—
#25
Montana
86%
—
#25
North Carolina
86%
—
#25
Ohio
86%
—
#31
New Jersey
85%
—
#31
North Dakota
85%
—
#33
Georgia
84%
—
#33
Minnesota
84%
—
#33
South Carolina
84%
—
#33
Washington
84%
—
#37
Louisiana
83%
—
#37
Rhode Island
83%
—
#37
Vermont
83%
—
#40
Colorado
82%
—
#40
Nevada
82%
—
#40
South Dakota
82%
—
#40
Wyoming
82%
—
#44
Michigan
81%
—
#44
Oregon
81%
—
#46
Idaho
80%
—
#47
Alaska
78%
—
#48
Arizona · your comparison
77%
—
—
New Mexico
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Oklahoma
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.
Arizona · 2022–23$11,768
Arizona rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees
Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.
2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · $11,7682022–23 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
$17,600
—
#2
New Hampshire
$17,019
—
#3
Pennsylvania
$16,217
—
#4
Connecticut
$15,763
—
#5
New Jersey
$15,265
—
#6
Illinois
$14,921
—
#7
Virginia
$14,825
—
#8
Rhode Island
$14,744
—
#9
Michigan
$14,718
—
#10
Massachusetts
$14,345
—
#11
Minnesota
$12,873
—
#12
South Carolina
$12,604
—
#13
Oregon
$12,424
—
#14
Delaware
$11,922
—
#15
Arizona · your comparison
$11,768
—
#16
Kentucky
$11,299
—
#17
Alabama
$11,081
—
#18
Ohio
$10,922
—
#19
Maine
$10,813
—
#20
Hawaii
$10,484
—
#21
Tennessee
$10,437
—
#22
Iowa
$10,121
—
#23
Maryland
$10,041
—
#24
Missouri
$9,926
—
#25
Indiana
$9,886
—
#26
Louisiana
$9,843
—
#27
Colorado
$9,798
—
#28
North Dakota
$9,728
—
#29
Kansas
$9,274
—
#30
Mississippi
$9,120
—
#31
South Dakota
$9,079
—
#32
Wisconsin
$8,974
—
#33
Arkansas
$8,879
—
#34
Nebraska
$8,862
—
#35
West Virginia
$8,715
—
#36
California
$8,637
—
#37
New York
$8,575
—
#38
Oklahoma
$8,519
—
#39
Alaska
$8,291
—
#40
Texas
$8,195
—
#41
Washington
$8,006
—
#42
Idaho
$7,640
—
#43
New Mexico
$7,526
—
#44
North Carolina
$7,327
—
#45
Montana
$7,299
—
#46
Utah
$7,215
—
#47
Georgia
$7,075
—
#48
Nevada
$6,723
—
#49
Wyoming
$5,100
—
#50
Florida
$4,540
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
20 of 20 reviewed Arizona actions · newest first
Jul 14, 2026 · H.R.9659 · Fund Schools, Not ICE Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Arizona delegation · H.R.9659
Fund Schools, Not ICE Act
Jul 14, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Greg Stanton · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
transfer certain unobligated funds appropriated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Secure America Act to the Department of Education to carry out programs under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's foreign-born population share.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
transfer certain unobligated funds appropriated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Secure America Act to the Department of Education to carry out programs under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 7, 2026 · SB 1166 · accommodation schools; high school equivalency · Enacted · Chapter 16Arizona Legislature · SB 1166
accommodation schools; high school equivalency
Apr 7, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 16
Sen. Hildy Angius · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses adult education, high-school completion, diploma requirements, equivalency credentials, or dropout recovery.
The official Arizona Legislature record shows the measure was enacted on April 7, 2026 as Chapter 16.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses adult education, high-school completion, diploma requirements, equivalency credentials, or dropout recovery. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's adult educational-attainment rate.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in House. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The bill addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's foreign-born population share.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 27, 2026 · HB 2880 · immigration; courts; hospitals; schools; daycares · Did not passArizona Legislature · HB 2880
immigration; courts; hospitals; schools; daycares
Jan 27, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Mariana Sandoval · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's foreign-born population share.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 26, 2026 · HB 2810 · health education; abortion providers; prohibitions · Did not passArizona Legislature · HB 2810
health education; abortion providers; prohibitions
Jan 26, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. John Gillette · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses abortion access, abortion services, restrictions, contraception, or reproductive healthcare.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, restrictions, contraception, or reproductive healthcare. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's reported abortion count.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Reported abortions among Arizona residents. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
health education; abortion providers; prohibitions
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Arizona officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Arizona candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
109 statements from 24 candidates
2026 Arizona Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Attorney General Kris Mayes will always stand up to anyone to protect the best interests of Arizonans. Mayes sued the federal government for breaking the law in order to fire Arizona workers, trying to raise prices with reckless tariffs, gutting funding for public education, and cutting funding for …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Protecting Arizonans’ Freedoms
Candidate campaign source
Attorney General Kris Mayes will always stand up to anyone to protect the best interests of Arizonans. Mayes sued the federal government for breaking the law in order to fire Arizona workers, trying to raise prices with reckless tariffs, gutting funding for public education, and cutting funding for our veterans and seniors. And, Mayes has successfully gotten back $2.3 billion dollars in federal funds for Arizona.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Protect the rights and freedoms of Arizonans to make their own education and health choices, supporting school choice policies and enacting the MAHA agenda at the state level.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Support Andy Biggs
Candidate campaign source
Protect the rights and freedoms of Arizonans to make their own education and health choices, supporting school choice policies and enacting the MAHA agenda at the state level.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
“ It is time we had a Governor who will promote healthy living and empower local ranchers and farmers to provide Arizona families with affordable, nutritious options,” said Sine Kerr, Republican nominee for Lt. Governor. “Many of the reasonable ideas we’ve laid out in our MAHA Platform were bills th…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Named Policy Platforms
Candidate campaign source
“ It is time we had a Governor who will promote healthy living and empower local ranchers and farmers to provide Arizona families with affordable, nutritious options,” said Sine Kerr, Republican nominee for Lt. Governor. “Many of the reasonable ideas we’ve laid out in our MAHA Platform were bills that were vetoed by Katie Hobbs, from protecting the medical choices of college students to limiting SNAP purchases to healthy, nutritious foods. We’ll be ready to implement our MAHA Platform on Day One and start making Arizona the healthiest state in the country. ”
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
She’s invested in public education from kindergarten through higher education, and she’s expanding apprenticeships and career training so more Arizonans can be first in line for good-paying jobs that don’t require a four-year degree.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: KATIE IS COMMITTED TO SOLVING ARIZONA’S BIGGEST CHALLENGES
Candidate campaign source
She’s invested in public education from kindergarten through higher education, and she’s expanding apprenticeships and career training so more Arizonans can be first in line for good-paying jobs that don’t require a four-year degree.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
Arizona public schools are failing today and the ESA program is being attacked as the culprit. I want to extend a greater audit in all school choice options, including public, charter, and ESA. Arizona is a leader in the country regarding school choice being now universal K-12. The ESA and voucher p…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education Quality / ESA Protection
Candidate campaign source
Arizona public schools are failing today and the ESA program is being attacked as the culprit. I want to extend a greater audit in all school choice options, including public, charter, and ESA. Arizona is a leader in the country regarding school choice being now universal K-12. The ESA and voucher program are now under major political scrutiny as they are being attacked as the causation to public schools lacking in funding. While ESA is a program that has grown beyond what was originally planned to be, the program does not cost tax payers more money, but it arranges the allocation of funds differently. What is interesting is most do not realize that if ESA reduces or goes away tax payer will actually pay more, by millions annually. The reason is because the ESA program is actually less money then charter or public schools. Allowing families to make a choice about their child’s school program is important to so many families. I think the main reason people are upset is because the false narrative in the media regarding the funding and public schools failing. However, the literature and research supports that there is much more fraud and misuse of funding in the public and charter schools then there is in the ESA program. In fact, the ESA program as much stricter guidelines of reporting where the public and charter schools do not. For instance, before the voucher and ESA programs expanded in 2022, in 2019 and current enrollment in public schools was decreasing and increasing was chart public schools. Despite this fact, school districts continued to add more and more schools and buildings. Now, there are buildings and schools closing, yet, as a business model the business (i.e., school) grew faster than the demand. In business, you do not expand when prior years show expansion could bankrupt your business. This is essentially what many districts did. Now closures are happening, but it was already hypothesized before this. So billions of tax payer funding was placed into new buildings that are now vacant and sitting property of over 12 billion estimate. It costs Arizona taxpayers the most to send their kids to public schools versus charter or ESA or another optional program. Now we have billions of dollars of empty building and real estate in Arizona due to schools closing. The other reason why schools are closing is because cost of living and inflation in Arizona. Families are moving away from the expensive districts to different states or different areas of Arizona thus the students do not exist to go to those schools and since 2007 the birth rates in Arizona have decreased making school age children less available to attend. Then we have the expanded school choice program in 2022 which further removed children from public school districts to choose a private or home school. Literature does show that as fluctuation of the ESA and public school choice changes decrease and children stick to one over the other that tax payer dollars will decrease. One area that needs to happen in all programs is that when a student moves from one program to another the money needs to go with the child to that new school. What is happening now is the money does not go into the school and then this costs the school more money per the student not originally accounted for. This would reduce spending of students too. Further, we need accountability in spending in all tax payer dollars for school spending. This means that even when a student goes to a private school that school who accepts the funds needs to be transparent about the spending, too, or they do not get to utilize tax payer dollars.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Inflation / Cost of Living
Candidate campaign source
Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will review executive board and higher up educator salaries to review national average to state average and reduce or increase and do the same for teachers and public school staff. ESA oversight and funding review to examine how funding for ESA impacts public schools and how ESA programs are revie…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education Quality / ESA Protection
Candidate campaign source
I will review executive board and higher up educator salaries to review national average to state average and reduce or increase and do the same for teachers and public school staff. ESA oversight and funding review to examine how funding for ESA impacts public schools and how ESA programs are reviewed for student scores and learning to meet standards of the state. I will address funding happening to the “Results Based Funding” (RBF) that rewards schools for letter grade performance. This reward system needs to take into account, more, the schools in economically disadvantaged districts and reward in ways that ensures the low performing schools are better supported. Right now the districts heavily receiving the funds include school districts in esteemed economic standing. I will address the auditor general reports that most recently (2025) show that there is a misuse of nonoperational spending of over 9 million dollars and why. Greater accountability needs to happen to spending in public school spending and dollar allowance. I will require the public school systems to publicly share where tax payer dollars is going including tax payer dollars going to ESA programs and spending, keep identifying parent/child information private. A reform of Arizona schools needs to happen to protect ESA and also protect and support public schools. Both systems, I believe, are capable of running simultaneously without hurting either one. The increase in per pupil spending in Arizona is below the national average, as it is, and I will review this. Arizona is low because Arizona places lower taxes in sectors funding school systems. I will review the all school choice programs for fraud and misuse of funds and make immediate changes. Again, I believe all programs can work together for accountability to tax payers and the state and create a very healthy and promising future for our children. Finally, there is some evidence to suggest that over the years the formula being used by the school education system in Arizona continues to inflate actual cost of school, increasing every year the amount coming in despite enrollment decrease. There is evidence to support that there is a surplus of money that within the school education system that is not being utilized by the districts. I will figure out where this money is and why it is being held back from going to pay teachers salaries higher and student education.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I am a mom. I also have a stepson whose mother has asked me not to share stories about him during my campaign, and I respect that. What I can say is that I love him deeply, and he helped make me a mom too. Having what I affectionately call my “belly baby”—my biological son—is an experience I cannot …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Families, Mothers, Fathers, Children
Candidate campaign source
I am a mom. I also have a stepson whose mother has asked me not to share stories about him during my campaign, and I respect that. What I can say is that I love him deeply, and he helped make me a mom too. Having what I affectionately call my “belly baby”—my biological son—is an experience I cannot fully put into words. It showed me a love and purpose I never knew I was missing. To every woman and family hoping to have children, struggling with infertility, or preparing to welcome a child into the world, my prayers are with you. I understand that the desire to become a parent is one of the strongest feelings a person can have. As Governor of Arizona, I will protect access to IVF, support adoption, and preserve Arizona’s current abortion laws. I believe education, access to resources, and support for families are critical. Too many young families are forced to delay or give up on their dreams of having children because of financial pressures. Arizona should be a state where families can grow, children can thrive, and parents can pursue their dreams without being overwhelmed by economic hardship. I will work to provide the resources, opportunities, and support that help families succeed and build a brighter future for the next generation
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Teri Ann Hourihan for AZ Governor. Arizona’s cost of living and inflation rates remain above national targets, making it increasingly difficult for families to afford housing, groceries, transportation, and other necessities. As Governor, I will address affordability by tackling its root causes. Ari…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing and cost of living
Candidate campaign source
Teri Ann Hourihan for AZ Governor. Arizona’s cost of living and inflation rates remain above national targets, making it increasingly difficult for families to afford housing, groceries, transportation, and other necessities. As Governor, I will address affordability by tackling its root causes. Arizona’s rapid growth, combined with water shortages, drought conditions, and housing supply constraints, has driven costs higher. By strengthening water security, improving school funding, reforming government agencies, and reducing fraud and waste, we can create long-term affordability for residents. My administration will work to lower utility costs, reduce inflationary pressures, increase wages, and expand opportunities for Arizonans to live within their means without needing multiple jobs. I will pursue stronger oversight of fuel pricing, expand rebate programs for teachers, first responders, public servants, farmers market vendors and shoppers, and incentivize water-efficient landscaping. I will promote affordable housing through adaptive reuse of vacant buildings, strengthen homelessness services, explore universal childcare options, and evaluate data center tax revenues to support affordability initiatives and public education
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affor…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: State Corruption / Mismanagement
Candidate campaign source
Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arizona candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Arizona incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arizona legislators and Arizona’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arizona’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
19 matching sponsorships or proposals · 15 Arizona incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Cesar Aguilar
Arizona House of Representatives, District 26 · D–AZ
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Cesar AguilarArizona Legislature · HB 2671
voter registration; college identification
Feb 5, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Cesar Aguilar · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses voter registration, voting access, ballots, early voting, vote-by-mail, or election administration.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2024 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses voter registration, voting access, ballots, early voting, vote-by-mail, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's 2024 registered-voter turnout.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
U.S. representative for Arizona, District 4 · D–AZ
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Greg StantonU.S. Congress · Arizona delegation · H.R.9659
Fund Schools, Not ICE Act
Jul 14, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Greg Stanton · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
transfer certain unobligated funds appropriated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Secure America Act to the Department of Education to carry out programs under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes
Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's foreign-born population share.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
transfer certain unobligated funds appropriated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Secure America Act to the Department of Education to carry out programs under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes
Arizona House of Representatives, District 30 · R–AZ
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. John GilletteArizona Legislature · HB 2810
health education; abortion providers; prohibitions
Jan 26, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. John Gillette · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses abortion access, abortion services, restrictions, contraception, or reproductive healthcare.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, restrictions, contraception, or reproductive healthcare. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's reported abortion count.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Reported abortions among Arizona residents. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
health education; abortion providers; prohibitions
The bill addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's foreign-born population share.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Arizona House of Representatives, District 15 · R–AZ
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Michael WayArizona Legislature · HB 2658
dropout recovery programs; repeal
Jan 22, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Michael Way · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses adult education, high-school completion, diploma requirements, equivalency credentials, or dropout recovery.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses adult education, high-school completion, diploma requirements, equivalency credentials, or dropout recovery. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's adult educational-attainment rate.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Arizona House of Representatives, District 1 · R–AZ
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Quang H NguyenArizona Legislature · HB 2448
firearms safety; training; schools
Mar 7, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Quang H Nguyen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Senate. The measure was not enacted in the 2022 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
firearms; universities; community colleges; campus
Jan 25, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Quang H Nguyen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention.
The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committee of Whole. The measure was not enacted in the 2022 session.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
firearms; universities; community colleges; campus
Only current Arizona officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arizona statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Arizona snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Arizona, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.