Arizona · individual fact

Arizona education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher89.4%2020–2024 · #38 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher42.6%2020–2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher33.3%2020–2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first

Arizona over time

Explore Arizona readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arizona officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arizona effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arizona change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading Arizona · source units
ArizonaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 208.1205.2214.8224.4Arizona, 2003: 208.9Arizona, 2005: 207.1Arizona, 2007: 209.5Arizona, 2009: 210Arizona, 2011: 212.4Arizona, 2013: 213.1Arizona, 2015: 215.3Arizona, 2017: 215.5Arizona, 2019: 215.8Arizona, 2022: 215.5Arizona, 2024: 208.1200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 20National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● Arizona Legislature · 1822● U.S. Congress · Arizona delegation · 1◆ Governor · 1■ Arizona agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2003-12-012026-08-31

20 of 20 reviewed Arizona actions match · 18 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.

Arizona · 2024: 208.1 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Arizona. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Arizona Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodArizonaRankU.S. benchmark
2024208.1#45 of 50215
2022215.5#28 of 50217.5
2019215.8#44 of 50220.5
2017215.5#42 of 50221.9
2015215.3#44 of 50222.5
2013213.1#45 of 50221.8
2011212.4#45 of 50221.2
2009210#47 of 50220.9
2007209.5#47 of 50221
2005207.1#47 of 50219
2003208.9#43 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Arizona · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

Arizona · 2020–202489.4%
Arizona rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · 89.4%2020–2024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona · your comparison89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

89.4%2020–2024 estimate

Share of Arizona residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
  • A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
Arizona · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

Arizona · 2024208.1
Arizona rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Arizona. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arizona
Grade 4 reading history in Arizona204.8214.8224.820032024
2024 · Arizona: 208.1 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arizona Grade 4 reading history
PeriodArizonaCompare
2003208.9
2005207.1
2007209.5
2009210
2011212.4
2013213.1
2015215.3
2017215.5
2019215.8
2022215.5
2024208.1

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · 208.12024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona · your comparison208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arizona · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

Arizona · FY2024$12,003
Arizona rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · $12,003FY2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona · your comparison$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arizona · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

Arizona · 2021–2277%
Arizona rank#48among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Arizona
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in Arizona73.2%81%88.8%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · Arizona: 77% · Rank #48 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Arizona Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodArizonaCompare
2011–1276%
2012–1375%
2013–1476%
2014–1577%
2015–1680%
2016–1778%
2017–1879%
2018–1978%
2019–2077%
2020–2176%
2021–2277%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · 77%2021–22 · Rank #48 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona · your comparison77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Arizona · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

Arizona · 2022–23$11,768
Arizona rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Arizona · $11,7682022–23 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona · your comparison$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Arizona candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

109 statements from 24 candidates

2026 Arizona Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Kris Mayes

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · AZ

Schools & education

Attorney General Kris Mayes will always stand up to anyone to protect the best interests of Arizonans. Mayes sued the federal government for breaking the law in order to fire Arizona workers, trying to raise prices with reckless tariffs, gutting funding for public education, and cutting funding for …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Protecting Arizonans’ Freedoms

Candidate campaign source

Attorney General Kris Mayes will always stand up to anyone to protect the best interests of Arizonans. Mayes sued the federal government for breaking the law in order to fire Arizona workers, trying to raise prices with reckless tariffs, gutting funding for public education, and cutting funding for our veterans and seniors. And, Mayes has successfully gotten back $2.3 billion dollars in federal funds for Arizona.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Kris Mayes campaign source 2 ↗

2026 Arizona Corporation Commissioner — 2 seats — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Jonathon Hill

1 statement

Democratic · Corporation Commissioner · AZ

Schools & education

Lower Utility Bills for Arizona Families, Schools, and Local Businesses

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lower Utility Bills for Arizona Families, Schools, and Local Businesses

Candidate campaign source

Lower Utility Bills for Arizona Families, Schools, and Local Businesses

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jonathon Hill — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Arizona Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 15 statements

Andy Biggs

3 statements

Republican · Governor · AZ

Schools & education

Protect the rights and freedoms of Arizonans to make their own education and health choices, supporting school choice policies and enacting the MAHA agenda at the state level.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Support Andy Biggs

Candidate campaign source

Protect the rights and freedoms of Arizonans to make their own education and health choices, supporting school choice policies and enacting the MAHA agenda at the state level.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Andy Biggs — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Andy Biggs
Schools & education

“ It is time we had a Governor who will promote healthy living and empower local ranchers and farmers to provide Arizona families with affordable, nutritious options,” said Sine Kerr, Republican nominee for Lt. Governor. “Many of the reasonable ideas we’ve laid out in our MAHA Platform were bills th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Named Policy Platforms

Candidate campaign source

“ It is time we had a Governor who will promote healthy living and empower local ranchers and farmers to provide Arizona families with affordable, nutritious options,” said Sine Kerr, Republican nominee for Lt. Governor. “Many of the reasonable ideas we’ve laid out in our MAHA Platform were bills that were vetoed by Katie Hobbs, from protecting the medical choices of college students to limiting SNAP purchases to healthy, nutritious foods. We’ll be ready to implement our MAHA Platform on Day One and start making Arizona the healthiest state in the country. ”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Andy Biggs — campaign source ↗
Schools & education

Protect School and Health Choice

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Protect School and Health Choice

Candidate campaign source

Protect School and Health Choice

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Andy Biggs — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Katie Hobbs

2 statements

Democratic · Governor · AZ

Schools & education

Continue investing in Arizona public education from early learning through higher education.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public Education

Candidate campaign source

Continue investing in Arizona public education from early learning through higher education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Katie Hobbs — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 1 more statement from Katie Hobbs
Schools & education

She’s invested in public education from kindergarten through higher education, and she’s expanding apprenticeships and career training so more Arizonans can be first in line for good-paying jobs that don’t require a four-year degree.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: KATIE IS COMMITTED TO SOLVING ARIZONA’S BIGGEST CHALLENGES

Candidate campaign source

She’s invested in public education from kindergarten through higher education, and she’s expanding apprenticeships and career training so more Arizonans can be first in line for good-paying jobs that don’t require a four-year degree.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Katie Hobbs — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗

Teri Ann Hourihan

10 statements

No Labels · Governor · AZ

Schools & education

Increase teacher and educator pay

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Increase teacher pay

Candidate campaign source

Increase teacher and educator pay

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
View 9 more statements from Teri Ann Hourihan
Schools & education

Arizona public schools are failing today and the ESA program is being attacked as the culprit. I want to extend a greater audit in all school choice options, including public, charter, and ESA. Arizona is a leader in the country regarding school choice being now universal K-12. The ESA and voucher p…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education Quality / ESA Protection

Candidate campaign source

Arizona public schools are failing today and the ESA program is being attacked as the culprit. I want to extend a greater audit in all school choice options, including public, charter, and ESA. Arizona is a leader in the country regarding school choice being now universal K-12. The ESA and voucher program are now under major political scrutiny as they are being attacked as the causation to public schools lacking in funding. While ESA is a program that has grown beyond what was originally planned to be, the program does not cost tax payers more money, but it arranges the allocation of funds differently. What is interesting is most do not realize that if ESA reduces or goes away tax payer will actually pay more, by millions annually. The reason is because the ESA program is actually less money then charter or public schools. Allowing families to make a choice about their child’s school program is important to so many families. I think the main reason people are upset is because the false narrative in the media regarding the funding and public schools failing. However, the literature and research supports that there is much more fraud and misuse of funding in the public and charter schools then there is in the ESA program. In fact, the ESA program as much stricter guidelines of reporting where the public and charter schools do not. For instance, before the voucher and ESA programs expanded in 2022, in 2019 and current enrollment in public schools was decreasing and increasing was chart public schools. Despite this fact, school districts continued to add more and more schools and buildings. Now, there are buildings and schools closing, yet, as a business model the business (i.e., school) grew faster than the demand. In business, you do not expand when prior years show expansion could bankrupt your business. This is essentially what many districts did. Now closures are happening, but it was already hypothesized before this. So billions of tax payer funding was placed into new buildings that are now vacant and sitting property of over 12 billion estimate. It costs Arizona taxpayers the most to send their kids to public schools versus charter or ESA or another optional program. Now we have billions of dollars of empty building and real estate in Arizona due to schools closing. The other reason why schools are closing is because cost of living and inflation in Arizona. Families are moving away from the expensive districts to different states or different areas of Arizona thus the students do not exist to go to those schools and since 2007 the birth rates in Arizona have decreased making school age children less available to attend. Then we have the expanded school choice program in 2022 which further removed children from public school districts to choose a private or home school. Literature does show that as fluctuation of the ESA and public school choice changes decrease and children stick to one over the other that tax payer dollars will decrease. One area that needs to happen in all programs is that when a student moves from one program to another the money needs to go with the child to that new school. What is happening now is the money does not go into the school and then this costs the school more money per the student not originally accounted for. This would reduce spending of students too. Further, we need accountability in spending in all tax payer dollars for school spending. This means that even when a student goes to a private school that school who accepts the funds needs to be transparent about the spending, too, or they do not get to utilize tax payer dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Schools & education

Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Inflation / Cost of Living

Candidate campaign source

Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Schools & education

I will review executive board and higher up educator salaries to review national average to state average and reduce or increase and do the same for teachers and public school staff. ESA oversight and funding review to examine how funding for ESA impacts public schools and how ESA programs are revie…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education Quality / ESA Protection

Candidate campaign source

I will review executive board and higher up educator salaries to review national average to state average and reduce or increase and do the same for teachers and public school staff. ESA oversight and funding review to examine how funding for ESA impacts public schools and how ESA programs are reviewed for student scores and learning to meet standards of the state. I will address funding happening to the “Results Based Funding” (RBF) that rewards schools for letter grade performance. This reward system needs to take into account, more, the schools in economically disadvantaged districts and reward in ways that ensures the low performing schools are better supported. Right now the districts heavily receiving the funds include school districts in esteemed economic standing. I will address the auditor general reports that most recently (2025) show that there is a misuse of nonoperational spending of over 9 million dollars and why. Greater accountability needs to happen to spending in public school spending and dollar allowance. I will require the public school systems to publicly share where tax payer dollars is going including tax payer dollars going to ESA programs and spending, keep identifying parent/child information private. A reform of Arizona schools needs to happen to protect ESA and also protect and support public schools. Both systems, I believe, are capable of running simultaneously without hurting either one. The increase in per pupil spending in Arizona is below the national average, as it is, and I will review this. Arizona is low because Arizona places lower taxes in sectors funding school systems. I will review the all school choice programs for fraud and misuse of funds and make immediate changes. Again, I believe all programs can work together for accountability to tax payers and the state and create a very healthy and promising future for our children. Finally, there is some evidence to suggest that over the years the formula being used by the school education system in Arizona continues to inflate actual cost of school, increasing every year the amount coming in despite enrollment decrease. There is evidence to support that there is a surplus of money that within the school education system that is not being utilized by the districts. I will figure out where this money is and why it is being held back from going to pay teachers salaries higher and student education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Schools & education

Align education and work skills so each complement each other and help the worker towards career development.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Connect education and workplace skills

Candidate campaign source

Align education and work skills so each complement each other and help the worker towards career development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Schools & education

I am a mom. I also have a stepson whose mother has asked me not to share stories about him during my campaign, and I respect that. What I can say is that I love him deeply, and he helped make me a mom too. Having what I affectionately call my “belly baby”—my biological son—is an experience I cannot …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Families, Mothers, Fathers, Children

Candidate campaign source

I am a mom. I also have a stepson whose mother has asked me not to share stories about him during my campaign, and I respect that. What I can say is that I love him deeply, and he helped make me a mom too. Having what I affectionately call my “belly baby”—my biological son—is an experience I cannot fully put into words. It showed me a love and purpose I never knew I was missing. To every woman and family hoping to have children, struggling with infertility, or preparing to welcome a child into the world, my prayers are with you. I understand that the desire to become a parent is one of the strongest feelings a person can have. As Governor of Arizona, I will protect access to IVF, support adoption, and preserve Arizona’s current abortion laws. I believe education, access to resources, and support for families are critical. Too many young families are forced to delay or give up on their dreams of having children because of financial pressures. Arizona should be a state where families can grow, children can thrive, and parents can pursue their dreams without being overwhelmed by economic hardship. I will work to provide the resources, opportunities, and support that help families succeed and build a brighter future for the next generation

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Schools & education

Teri Ann Hourihan for AZ Governor. Arizona’s cost of living and inflation rates remain above national targets, making it increasingly difficult for families to afford housing, groceries, transportation, and other necessities. As Governor, I will address affordability by tackling its root causes. Ari…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Teri Ann Hourihan for AZ Governor. Arizona’s cost of living and inflation rates remain above national targets, making it increasingly difficult for families to afford housing, groceries, transportation, and other necessities. As Governor, I will address affordability by tackling its root causes. Arizona’s rapid growth, combined with water shortages, drought conditions, and housing supply constraints, has driven costs higher. By strengthening water security, improving school funding, reforming government agencies, and reducing fraud and waste, we can create long-term affordability for residents. My administration will work to lower utility costs, reduce inflationary pressures, increase wages, and expand opportunities for Arizonans to live within their means without needing multiple jobs. I will pursue stronger oversight of fuel pricing, expand rebate programs for teachers, first responders, public servants, farmers market vendors and shoppers, and incentivize water-efficient landscaping. I will promote affordable housing through adaptive reuse of vacant buildings, strengthen homelessness services, explore universal childcare options, and evaluate data center tax revenues to support affordability initiatives and public education

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Schools & education

Review salaries of teachers and public administrative staff in schools to ensure fair salary profiles are being implemented with state reviews.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education Quality / ESA Protection

Candidate campaign source

Review salaries of teachers and public administrative staff in schools to ensure fair salary profiles are being implemented with state reviews.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Schools & education

Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affor…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: State Corruption / Mismanagement

Candidate campaign source

Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Schools & education

Funding to provide counseling services within public school settings.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education Quality / ESA Protection

Candidate campaign source

Funding to provide counseling services within public school settings.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teri Ann Hourihan — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 5
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arizona candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Arizona incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arizona legislators and Arizona’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arizona’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

19 matching sponsorships or proposals · 15 Arizona incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Cesar Aguilar

Arizona House of Representatives, District 26 · D–AZ

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Cesar Aguilar
Arizona Legislature · HB 2671

voter registration; college identification

Feb 5, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Cesar Aguilar · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses voter registration, voting access, ballots, early voting, vote-by-mail, or election administration.

The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2024 session.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses voter registration, voting access, ballots, early voting, vote-by-mail, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's 2024 registered-voter turnout.

Retained Arizona evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

voter registration; college identification
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Greg Stanton

U.S. representative for Arizona, District 4 · D–AZ

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Greg Stanton
U.S. Congress · Arizona delegation · H.R.9659

Fund Schools, Not ICE Act

Jul 14, 2026 · Introduced

Rep. Greg Stanton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

transfer certain unobligated funds appropriated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Secure America Act to the Department of Education to carry out programs under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes

Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's foreign-born population share.

Retained Arizona evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

transfer certain unobligated funds appropriated to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Secure America Act to the Department of Education to carry out programs under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. John Gillette

Arizona House of Representatives, District 30 · R–AZ

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. John Gillette
Arizona Legislature · HB 2810

health education; abortion providers; prohibitions

Jan 26, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. John Gillette · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses abortion access, abortion services, restrictions, contraception, or reproductive healthcare.

The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, restrictions, contraception, or reproductive healthcare. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's reported abortion count.

Retained Arizona evidence context: Reported abortions among Arizona residents. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

health education; abortion providers; prohibitions
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Mariana Sandoval

Arizona House of Representatives, District 23 · D–AZ

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Mariana Sandoval
Arizona Legislature · HB 2880

immigration; courts; hospitals; schools; daycares

Jan 27, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Mariana Sandoval · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status.

The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's foreign-born population share.

Retained Arizona evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

immigration; courts; hospitals; schools; daycares
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Michael Way

Arizona House of Representatives, District 15 · R–AZ

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Michael Way
Arizona Legislature · HB 2658

dropout recovery programs; repeal

Jan 22, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Michael Way · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses adult education, high-school completion, diploma requirements, equivalency credentials, or dropout recovery.

The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committees. The measure was not enacted in the 2026 session.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses adult education, high-school completion, diploma requirements, equivalency credentials, or dropout recovery. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's adult educational-attainment rate.

Retained Arizona evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

dropout recovery programs; repeal
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Quang H Nguyen

Arizona House of Representatives, District 1 · R–AZ

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Quang H Nguyen
Arizona Legislature · HB 2448

firearms safety; training; schools

Mar 7, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Quang H Nguyen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention.

The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Senate. The measure was not enacted in the 2022 session.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Arizona evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

firearms safety; training; schools
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Arizona Legislature · HB 2447

firearms; universities; community colleges; campus

Jan 25, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Quang H Nguyen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention.

The official Arizona Legislature record lists this final disposition: Held in Committee of Whole. The measure was not enacted in the 2022 session.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Arizona evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

firearms; universities; community colleges; campus
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Arizona officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arizona statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.