Compare Arizona’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.
BLS does not publish a statewide Arizona CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.
All-items price level100.72024 · #16 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level95.42024 · #42 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level106.82024 · #15 of 50 · highest first
Arizona over time
Explore Arizona readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Arizona officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Arizona effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Arizona change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
All-items price level Arizona · source units
ArizonaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
7 of 7 reviewed Arizona actions match · 4 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.
Arizona · 2024: 100.7 · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Arizona with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Arizona · state comparison
How does Arizona’s cost of living compare?
The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.
Arizona · 2024100.7
Arizona rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
All-items price level
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.
Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Arizona with the published U.S. category value shown.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2024 · Arizona: 100.7 · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona All-items price level history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2014
97.9
2015
97.9
2016
98.6
2017
97.9
2018
97.4
2019
97.8
2020
99.2
2021
96.6
2022
100
2023
100.7
2024
100.7
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 100.72024 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
110.7
—
#2
Hawaii
110
—
#3
New Jersey
108.8
—
#4
New York
107.9
—
#5
Washington
107
—
#6
Massachusetts
105.8
—
#7
Maryland
105
—
#8
New Hampshire
104.2
—
#9
Connecticut
103.6
—
#10
Florida
103.4
—
#11
Oregon
103.4
—
#12
Colorado
103.1
—
#13
Alaska
102.4
—
#14
Rhode Island
102.3
—
#15
Virginia
101.1
—
#16
Arizona · your comparison
100.7
—
#17
Nevada
100
—
#18
Illinois
100
—
#19
Delaware
99.8
—
#20
Utah
98.9
—
#21
Minnesota
98.6
—
#22
Vermont
98
—
#23
Pennsylvania
97.6
—
#24
Texas
97.1
—
#25
Maine
97.1
—
#26
Georgia
96.3
—
#27
Michigan
96.2
—
#28
Idaho
95.5
—
#29
Montana
94.6
—
#30
North Carolina
94.3
—
#31
Wisconsin
94.1
—
#32
South Carolina
93.7
—
#33
Indiana
93.3
—
#34
Ohio
92.8
—
#35
Wyoming
92.7
—
#36
New Mexico
92.2
—
#37
Tennessee
91.9
—
#38
Missouri
90.8
—
#39
Kentucky
90.2
—
#40
Nebraska
90.1
—
#41
Kansas
90.1
—
#42
West Virginia
89.5
—
#43
North Dakota
89
—
#44
Alabama
88.8
—
#45
South Dakota
88.6
—
#46
Louisiana
88.2
—
#47
Oklahoma
87.8
—
#48
Iowa
87.8
—
#49
Mississippi
87
—
#50
Arkansas
86.9
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
Arizona · 20242.6%
Arizona rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual change in regional price deflator
Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.
An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2024 · Arizona: 2.6% · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Annual change in regional price deflator history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2015
0.1%
2016
1.8%
2017
1%
2018
1.5%
2019
1.8%
2020
2.6%
2021
1.4%
2022
10.3%
2023
4.6%
2024
2.6%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · 2.6%2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Montana
6.7%
—
#2
Idaho
6.2%
—
#3
Utah
6%
—
#4
Nevada
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Mexico
4%
—
#7
Indiana
4%
—
#8
Wyoming
3.9%
—
#9
Illinois
3.9%
—
#10
Colorado
3.8%
—
#11
Delaware
3.7%
—
#12
Ohio
3.6%
—
#13
Wisconsin
3.6%
—
#14
North Dakota
3.5%
—
#15
Vermont
3.5%
—
#16
South Dakota
3.1%
—
#17
Maryland
3%
—
#18
Minnesota
3%
—
#19
Kentucky
2.9%
—
#20
South Carolina
2.9%
—
#21
Hawaii
2.9%
—
#22
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#23
Mississippi
2.8%
—
#24
Kansas
2.8%
—
#25
Pennsylvania
2.8%
—
#26
Arkansas
2.8%
—
#27
New York
2.7%
—
#28
Arizona · your comparison
2.6%
—
#29
North Carolina
2.5%
—
#30
Texas
2.5%
—
#31
New Jersey
2.5%
—
#32
West Virginia
2.5%
—
#33
Nebraska
2.4%
—
#34
Georgia
2.4%
—
#35
Florida
2.4%
—
#36
Virginia
2.4%
—
#37
Tennessee
2.4%
—
#38
Alabama
2.3%
—
#39
Missouri
2.3%
—
#40
Louisiana
2%
—
#41
Connecticut
2%
—
#42
Alaska
1.7%
—
#43
Maine
1.7%
—
#44
Oklahoma
1.6%
—
#45
Iowa
1.5%
—
#46
New Hampshire
1.4%
—
#47
Washington
1.3%
—
#48
California
1.3%
—
#49
Oregon
1.2%
—
#50
Massachusetts
0.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.
Arizona · 2024$52,890
Arizona rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.
Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Arizona
2024 · Arizona: $52,890 · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Arizona Real personal income per person history
Period
Arizona
Compare
2014
$40,281
2015
$41,960
2016
$42,568
2017
$44,279
2018
$45,675
2019
$47,236
2020
$50,292
2021
$54,424
2022
$50,935
2023
$51,960
2024
$52,890
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Arizona stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Arizona has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Arizona · $52,8902024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Arizona with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Wyoming
$75,501
—
#2
Connecticut
$74,254
—
#3
Massachusetts
$71,629
—
#4
South Dakota
$69,153
—
#5
Nebraska
$65,297
—
#6
North Dakota
$65,271
—
#7
Colorado
$65,223
—
#8
New Hampshire
$64,632
—
#9
Washington
$64,421
—
#10
New York
$64,153
—
#11
New Jersey
$63,142
—
#12
California
$63,028
—
#13
Minnesota
$62,039
—
#14
Virginia
$61,914
—
#15
Maryland
$61,111
—
#16
Illinois
$60,333
—
#17
Alaska
$60,272
—
#18
Iowa
$60,144
—
#19
Montana
$59,203
—
#20
Kansas
$59,172
—
#21
Vermont
$58,893
—
#22
Oklahoma
$58,692
—
#23
Pennsylvania
$58,620
—
#24
Tennessee
$58,582
—
#25
Wisconsin
$58,273
—
#26
Texas
$58,219
—
#27
Missouri
$57,850
—
#28
Maine
$57,480
—
#29
Florida
$57,131
—
#30
Louisiana
$56,789
—
#31
Nevada
$56,503
—
#32
North Carolina
$56,310
—
#33
Ohio
$56,232
—
#34
Rhode Island
$55,878
—
#35
Indiana
$55,562
—
#36
Oregon
$55,451
—
#37
Arkansas
$55,219
—
#38
Delaware
$55,185
—
#39
Utah
$55,116
—
#40
Michigan
$53,569
—
#41
Georgia
$52,952
—
#42
Arizona · your comparison
$52,890
—
#43
Idaho
$52,816
—
#44
South Carolina
$52,463
—
#45
Kentucky
$52,290
—
#46
Hawaii
$52,272
—
#47
Alabama
$52,216
—
#48
New Mexico
$51,121
—
#49
West Virginia
$50,051
—
#50
Mississippi
$48,465
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
7 of 7 reviewed Arizona actions · newest first
Sep 4, 2026 · Current Arizona gasoline tax · Arizona gasoline fuel-tax rate · Current rate in effectArizona agencies · Current Arizona gasoline tax
ADOT's current fuel-tax guidance lists Arizona's gasoline tax at 18 cents per gallon.
Why this record is included
ADOT lists Arizona's gasoline tax at 18 cents per gallon. That tax is a direct Arizona component of tax-inclusive pump prices, but it does not set crude-oil, refining, distribution, or retail margins and does not govern the full six-state EIA regional average.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
ADOT's Fuel Tax Evasion Unit page states that Arizona's tax on gasoline, or motor vehicle fuel, is 18 cents per gallon and that Arizona does not regulate fuel prices.
HB 2986 extended the federal-approval window for Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline plan revisions through July 1, 2029.
Governor Katie Hobbs signed HB 2986 on June 19, 2026; the general effective date is September 12, 2026.
Why this record is included
Enacted HB 2986 extended to July 1, 2029 the conditional-enactment deadlines for state implementation plan revisions that include Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline changes. The law preserves time for federal approval of an alternative gasoline formulation; it does not itself approve the blend or establish a retail price.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official signed summary says HB 2986 extends State Implementation Plan revision conditional-enactment dates from July 1, 2027 to July 1, 2029; ADEQ identifies cleaner-burning gasoline revisions among the affected provisions.
HB 2400 would have created a recurring summer gasoline-tax holiday in designated Maricopa and Pinal County areas.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2400.
Why this record is included
HB 2400 would have suspended Arizona's 18-cent motor-vehicle-fuel tax from May through September in Area A and Area C and barred vendors there from adding or recovering that tax from consumers. It directly targeted a pump-price component but did not pass before the 2026 session ended.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official House summary says HB 2400 would suspend the motor-vehicle-fuel tax in Area A and Area C from May 1 to October 1 each year.
HB 2401 would have required recurring state reviews of alternative fuel formulations for the Phoenix and western Pinal County gasoline markets.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2401.
Why this record is included
HB 2401 would have required ADEQ to review available fuel formulations every two years, assess switching to formulations not then authorized in Area A or Area C, and report their expected air-quality effects and recommendations. The review could inform gasoline supply rules, but the bill would not itself authorize a new blend or set a retail price and did not pass.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official bill text requires biennial review of available fuel formulations and assessment of switching to formulations not authorized in Area A or Area C.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 13, 2026 · HB 2696 · commerce authority; gas; prices; prioritization · Did not passArizona Legislature · HB 2696
commerce authority; gas; prices; prioritization
Jun 13, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Julie Willoughby · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2696 would have studied Arizona fuel-supply resilience and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting the Senate-amended HB 2696.
Why this record is included
The Senate-amended HB 2696 would have directed a fuel-resiliency review covering refinery and storage capacity, supply stability, and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends. It addressed structural gasoline-supply questions but would not itself set pump prices, and it was not enacted before adjournment.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Official Arizona Legislature materials describe a fuel-resiliency task force and studies of refineries, storage capacity, supply stability, and alternative lower-production-cost fuel blends.
HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation and shortage-waiver rules, subject to federal approval.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2955.
Why this record is included
HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation standards in Area A and Area C and expanded supply-shortage waiver procedures, conditional on EPA approval by 2030. Those rules directly govern gasoline that may be sold in the Phoenix and western Pinal County markets, but the bill did not pass and would not have set retail prices.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official Senate fact sheet says HB 2955 would require ASTM D4814 gasoline from April through October in specified areas, revise supply-shortage waiver procedures, and take effect only with EPA approval.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Arizona officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Arizona candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
26 statements from 12 candidates
2026 Arizona Attorney General — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Mayes takes on anyone who rips off Arizonans — and doesn't back down. Mayes fought to protect Arizonans from corporate price gouging, prosecuting corporate landlords for inflating housing costs and ending monopolistic tactics that raise prices on groceries and utilities. She's standing up to data ce…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Protecting Arizonans’ Freedoms
Candidate campaign source
Mayes takes on anyone who rips off Arizonans — and doesn't back down. Mayes fought to protect Arizonans from corporate price gouging, prosecuting corporate landlords for inflating housing costs and ending monopolistic tactics that raise prices on groceries and utilities. She's standing up to data centers driving up our utility bills. Mayes will keep fighting to keep us safe and make life more affordable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Lowering costs for Arizona families, seniors and veterans is Clara’s top priority. As a member of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Clara promises to fight for affordable residential utility bills, demand transparency and accountability from utility companies, ensure data centers pay their fair sh…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Utility affordability
Candidate campaign source
Lowering costs for Arizona families, seniors and veterans is Clara’s top priority. As a member of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Clara promises to fight for affordable residential utility bills, demand transparency and accountability from utility companies, ensure data centers pay their fair share, protect our precious water resources, advocate for rural and tribal communities and invest in Arizona’s energy future.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
For too long, Arizona Corporation Commissioners have served the interests of utility companies by allowing our electricity and water bills to skyrocket without better service, efficiency and cost justifications. They have also given special preference to high-demand users like data centers. Clara Pr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Protecting Your Family From Out-of-Control Costs
Candidate campaign source
For too long, Arizona Corporation Commissioners have served the interests of utility companies by allowing our electricity and water bills to skyrocket without better service, efficiency and cost justifications. They have also given special preference to high-demand users like data centers. Clara Pratte is dedicated to lowering utility costs for everyday Arizonans, creating jobs and expanding energy independence in our state. She believes it’s past time to restore integrity to the Arizona Corporation Commission and to put your best interests first.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
We need a forward-looking energy portfolio. By prioritizing low-cost, reliable, and water-saving energy sources like solar and battery storage, we can stabilize energy costs. I will champion energy efficiency and demand-management programs that directly lower monthly bills for households and local b…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Invest in Affordability & Reliability
Candidate campaign source
We need a forward-looking energy portfolio. By prioritizing low-cost, reliable, and water-saving energy sources like solar and battery storage, we can stabilize energy costs. I will champion energy efficiency and demand-management programs that directly lower monthly bills for households and local businesses.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Arizona families and small businesses are facing a persistent squeeze: utility bills are skyrocketing while water resources become scarcer and data center development accelerates—all while utility companies report record profits. The current Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) has failed to protect…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Jonathon’s Platform
Candidate campaign source
Arizona families and small businesses are facing a persistent squeeze: utility bills are skyrocketing while water resources become scarcer and data center development accelerates—all while utility companies report record profits. The current Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) has failed to protect the public, instead acting as a rubber stamp for rate increases and adopting expedited review systems that limit necessary oversight.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Katie knows that securing Arizona’s water future isn’t a partisan issue—and that protecting our water supply means bringing everyone to the table to get results. She hammered out a strong water policy compromise hailed as the most consequential Arizona water legislation since the Groundwater Managem…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: KATIE IS COMMITTED TO SOLVING ARIZONA’S BIGGEST CHALLENGES
Candidate campaign source
Katie knows that securing Arizona’s water future isn’t a partisan issue—and that protecting our water supply means bringing everyone to the table to get results. She hammered out a strong water policy compromise hailed as the most consequential Arizona water legislation since the Groundwater Management Act of 1980—one that will create jobs, lower housing costs, and conserve water. And when a foreign corporation was pumping Arizona’s groundwater unchecked, Katie took action and ended their leases.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
Arizona public schools are failing today and the ESA program is being attacked as the culprit. I want to extend a greater audit in all school choice options, including public, charter, and ESA. Arizona is a leader in the country regarding school choice being now universal K-12. The ESA and voucher p…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education Quality / ESA Protection
Candidate campaign source
Arizona public schools are failing today and the ESA program is being attacked as the culprit. I want to extend a greater audit in all school choice options, including public, charter, and ESA. Arizona is a leader in the country regarding school choice being now universal K-12. The ESA and voucher program are now under major political scrutiny as they are being attacked as the causation to public schools lacking in funding. While ESA is a program that has grown beyond what was originally planned to be, the program does not cost tax payers more money, but it arranges the allocation of funds differently. What is interesting is most do not realize that if ESA reduces or goes away tax payer will actually pay more, by millions annually. The reason is because the ESA program is actually less money then charter or public schools. Allowing families to make a choice about their child’s school program is important to so many families. I think the main reason people are upset is because the false narrative in the media regarding the funding and public schools failing. However, the literature and research supports that there is much more fraud and misuse of funding in the public and charter schools then there is in the ESA program. In fact, the ESA program as much stricter guidelines of reporting where the public and charter schools do not. For instance, before the voucher and ESA programs expanded in 2022, in 2019 and current enrollment in public schools was decreasing and increasing was chart public schools. Despite this fact, school districts continued to add more and more schools and buildings. Now, there are buildings and schools closing, yet, as a business model the business (i.e., school) grew faster than the demand. In business, you do not expand when prior years show expansion could bankrupt your business. This is essentially what many districts did. Now closures are happening, but it was already hypothesized before this. So billions of tax payer funding was placed into new buildings that are now vacant and sitting property of over 12 billion estimate. It costs Arizona taxpayers the most to send their kids to public schools versus charter or ESA or another optional program. Now we have billions of dollars of empty building and real estate in Arizona due to schools closing. The other reason why schools are closing is because cost of living and inflation in Arizona. Families are moving away from the expensive districts to different states or different areas of Arizona thus the students do not exist to go to those schools and since 2007 the birth rates in Arizona have decreased making school age children less available to attend. Then we have the expanded school choice program in 2022 which further removed children from public school districts to choose a private or home school. Literature does show that as fluctuation of the ESA and public school choice changes decrease and children stick to one over the other that tax payer dollars will decrease. One area that needs to happen in all programs is that when a student moves from one program to another the money needs to go with the child to that new school. What is happening now is the money does not go into the school and then this costs the school more money per the student not originally accounted for. This would reduce spending of students too. Further, we need accountability in spending in all tax payer dollars for school spending. This means that even when a student goes to a private school that school who accepts the funds needs to be transparent about the spending, too, or they do not get to utilize tax payer dollars.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Inflation / Cost of Living
Candidate campaign source
Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Teri Ann Hourihan for AZ Governor. Arizona’s cost of living and inflation rates remain above national targets, making it increasingly difficult for families to afford housing, groceries, transportation, and other necessities. As Governor, I will address affordability by tackling its root causes. Ari…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing and cost of living
Candidate campaign source
Teri Ann Hourihan for AZ Governor. Arizona’s cost of living and inflation rates remain above national targets, making it increasingly difficult for families to afford housing, groceries, transportation, and other necessities. As Governor, I will address affordability by tackling its root causes. Arizona’s rapid growth, combined with water shortages, drought conditions, and housing supply constraints, has driven costs higher. By strengthening water security, improving school funding, reforming government agencies, and reducing fraud and waste, we can create long-term affordability for residents. My administration will work to lower utility costs, reduce inflationary pressures, increase wages, and expand opportunities for Arizonans to live within their means without needing multiple jobs. I will pursue stronger oversight of fuel pricing, expand rebate programs for teachers, first responders, public servants, farmers market vendors and shoppers, and incentivize water-efficient landscaping. I will promote affordable housing through adaptive reuse of vacant buildings, strengthen homelessness services, explore universal childcare options, and evaluate data center tax revenues to support affordability initiatives and public education
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affor…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: State Corruption / Mismanagement
Candidate campaign source
Inflation / Cost of Living Arizona’s cost of living and inflation index is 2x the national average goal (2% inflation to meet standards of living and wage increase) and above the national average of 3.8% that is also higher than the goal of inflation for the nation. As a result, Arizona is not affordable for many to live, eat, or put gas in their car without multifamily living, multiple jobs, and/or both. Arizona grew so fast that inflation grew with it as supply did not meet demand. This was coupled by an ongoing water crisis and drought Arizona is in and a moratorium of construction. Affordability/cost of living is not at the bottom of this list because it is least important but instead is at the bottom because I believe that when we address the areas above (water, school funding, fraud and agency reform) we will automatically begin to address the affordability and cost of living crisis happening in Arizona, too. We need to be able to reduce utility cost for residents, slow and reduce inflation in Arizona while increasing minimum wage, create opportunities for people in Arizona to live within their means without having to work multiple jobs to afford groceries and gas. I will address gas price inflation that can occur easily in the state of Arizona with gas station owners with the right to increase or decrease their cost at will. I will implement rebate programs, more that what already exists, to farmers market vendors and buyers, teachers, public servants, and first responders to address the overwhelming need to meet demand and supply to people serving our state and community. I will create rebate programs for removing grass and implementing desert landscape and low water usage in homes (again, enhancing what is present already in these setups). I will also create city structures that support shorter commutes and utilize current vacant buildings for low cost community living. Shelters and those who are homeless will have more resources, support, and attention to options to help them have safe housing, food options, and childcare support. I will also review, further, New Mexico’s universal childcare program that is no cost to the public to implement in Arizona in a short term plan and step up agenda to full cost covered 0-K grades. Taxing data centers and implementing this tax money to cost of living expenditures and changes will be reviewed as well as use of data center tax money being used for public school systems.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Water & Energy Costs Water in Arizona is reaching a critical point right now that many in the public do not realize the real crisis happening. Arizona is needing to quickly, and immediately, implement a long term solution to water preservation as water in the Colorado River, Lake Powell, and Lake Me…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Teri's Agenda
Candidate campaign source
Water & Energy Costs Water in Arizona is reaching a critical point right now that many in the public do not realize the real crisis happening. Arizona is needing to quickly, and immediately, implement a long term solution to water preservation as water in the Colorado River, Lake Powell, and Lake Meade are reaching all time lows. Arizona is also part of the 7 state basin Colorado River plan but is the second to last of the states receiving the least. Lake Powell and Lake Meade are reducing in water annually at all time lows. Arizona cannot rely on these sources exclusively anymore and we need to address now what to do. I will put in emergency orders for water conservation in the state similar to other states such as Nevada who is one of the leading states in water conservation now. I will implement and review Nevada’s current water conservation methods to implement in Arizona as there are working blueprints in other states similar to Arizona that can work here. Nevada is a similar state as Arizona regarding the Colorado River crisis and similar weather and how they are creating long term solutions to reusing and conserving water and building conservation plants to have. Nevada states Nevada as a state is “drought resistant” with these plans in place. Arizona has reviewed plans for desalination water plants in Mexico and approval for 5.5 billion dollars was given for the plan to have water funneled through Mexico through systems and tunnels to Arizona in a desalination process. Following approval of this plan it was later dropped due to legislatures questioning the process through ecosystems that they believed could be harmed (despite the plant developers stating this will not occur) https://www.enr.com/articles/55659-arizona-advances-55b-mexico-desalination-plant-proposal. Now, Arizona is reviewing how to work with California to purchase more of their Colorado River water. One idea for this too, is that Arizona could help fund California’s current desalination plant as a short term solution in purchasing the Colorado River water while coming up with a plan for a long term solution in Arizona. The problem, I think, with Arizona purchasing water from California’s right to Colorado River water is this is not a long term solution but still a short term solution. We need plants for water conservation occurring in other states that supply their water outside of the Colorado River and other sources of water running low to supply Arizona long term. I will review where the 5.5 billion dollar fund approval is, why it stopped, and how to start a plan now to ensure water sustainability long term in Arizona. Fighting lawsuits for water conservation of depleting sources is not a long term solution either. I want Arizona to have its own plan outside of the other current conservation methods and plants operating that creates a "drought resistant” plan in Arizona, too. These plants can take up to 10-20 years, therefore, I will review short term plans such as buying colorado river from california while our current long term plan starts. Immediately these areas need to happen as Arizona is growing fast and our water cannot keep up with it. I will also address water through data center plants and ensure that data centers are paying taxes to build, have greater restriction on building, and review their water sources being used. Finally, I will immediately change the tax cuts to data centers making the data centers pay their way, have greater parameters to building, and energy resource use by the data centers paid by them to extend and/or operate. Expand interstates for corridor partnerships to ensure safe roads and safe actions..Incentivize efficiency upgrades: tax credits and/or rebates.Promote renewable energy: Develop solar and wind infrastructure to climate and energy.Ensure utility companies are not placing unnecessary costs onto the consumers.Support companies that complete energy audits for free or low cost.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Arizona candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Arizona incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Arizona legislators and Arizona’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Arizona’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
6 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Arizona incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Gail Griffin
Arizona House of Representatives, District 19 · R–AZ
HB 2986 extended the federal-approval window for Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline plan revisions through July 1, 2029.
Governor Katie Hobbs signed HB 2986 on June 19, 2026; the general effective date is September 12, 2026.
Why this record is included
Enacted HB 2986 extended to July 1, 2029 the conditional-enactment deadlines for state implementation plan revisions that include Arizona cleaner-burning gasoline changes. The law preserves time for federal approval of an alternative gasoline formulation; it does not itself approve the blend or establish a retail price.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official signed summary says HB 2986 extends State Implementation Plan revision conditional-enactment dates from July 1, 2027 to July 1, 2029; ADEQ identifies cleaner-burning gasoline revisions among the affected provisions.
HB 2400 would have created a recurring summer gasoline-tax holiday in designated Maricopa and Pinal County areas.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2400.
Why this record is included
HB 2400 would have suspended Arizona's 18-cent motor-vehicle-fuel tax from May through September in Area A and Area C and barred vendors there from adding or recovering that tax from consumers. It directly targeted a pump-price component but did not pass before the 2026 session ended.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official House summary says HB 2400 would suspend the motor-vehicle-fuel tax in Area A and Area C from May 1 to October 1 each year.
HB 2401 would have required recurring state reviews of alternative fuel formulations for the Phoenix and western Pinal County gasoline markets.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2401.
Why this record is included
HB 2401 would have required ADEQ to review available fuel formulations every two years, assess switching to formulations not then authorized in Area A or Area C, and report their expected air-quality effects and recommendations. The review could inform gasoline supply rules, but the bill would not itself authorize a new blend or set a retail price and did not pass.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official bill text requires biennial review of available fuel formulations and assessment of switching to formulations not authorized in Area A or Area C.
HB 2696 would have studied Arizona fuel-supply resilience and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting the Senate-amended HB 2696.
Why this record is included
The Senate-amended HB 2696 would have directed a fuel-resiliency review covering refinery and storage capacity, supply stability, and potentially lower-production-cost gasoline blends. It addressed structural gasoline-supply questions but would not itself set pump prices, and it was not enacted before adjournment.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Official Arizona Legislature materials describe a fuel-resiliency task force and studies of refineries, storage capacity, supply stability, and alternative lower-production-cost fuel blends.
HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation and shortage-waiver rules, subject to federal approval.
The Arizona Legislature adjourned on June 13, 2026 without enacting HB 2955.
Why this record is included
HB 2955 would have changed seasonal gasoline-formulation standards in Area A and Area C and expanded supply-shortage waiver procedures, conditional on EPA approval by 2030. Those rules directly govern gasoline that may be sold in the Phoenix and western Pinal County markets, but the bill did not pass and would not have set retail prices.
Retained Arizona evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official Senate fact sheet says HB 2955 would require ASTM D4814 gasoline from April through October in specified areas, revise supply-shortage waiver procedures, and take effect only with EPA approval.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Ruben GallegoU.S. Congress · Arizona delegation · S.1527
Housing Affordability Act
Apr 30, 2025 · Introduced
Sen. Ruben Gallego · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Housing Affordability Act This bill increases the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA's) multifamily housing loan limits for mortgage insurance and requires the use of a more specific inflation index for these limits. Specifically, the bill increases the loan limits to qualify for FHA mortgage insurance for rental housing, cooperative housing, rehabilitation and neighborhood conservation housing, housing for moderate income and displaced families, housing for elderly persons, and condominiums, and it requires these limits to be indexed to the Price Deflator Index of Multifamily Residential Units Under Construction released by the Bureau of the Census. Currently, these limits are indexed…
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, rental assistance, eviction, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Arizona's median gross rent.
Retained Arizona evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Housing Affordability Act This bill increases the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA's) multifamily housing loan limits for mortgage insurance and requires the use of a more specific inflation index for these limits. Specifically, the bill increases the loan limits to qualify for FHA mortgage insurance for rental housing, cooperative housing, rehabilitation and neighborhood conservation housing, housing for moderate income and displaced families, housing for elderly persons, and condominiums, and it requires these limits to be indexed to the Price Deflator Index of Multifamily Residential Units Under Construction released by the Bureau of…
Only current Arizona officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Arizona statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Arizona snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Arizona, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.