Alaska · individual fact

Alaska real gross domestic product

Alaska’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$56.34B2025 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth4.7%2025 · #2 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$73.63B2025 · #48 of 50 · highest first

Alaska over time

Explore Alaska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alaska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alaska effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alaska change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Alaska · source units
AlaskaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $56.34B$0$13.41T$26.81TAlaska, 2014: $53.3BAlaska, 2015: $53.68BAlaska, 2016: $53.46BAlaska, 2017: $53.55BAlaska, 2018: $52.48BAlaska, 2019: $52.38BAlaska, 2020: $50.94BAlaska, 2021: $51.59BAlaska, 2022: $50.38BAlaska, 2023: $52.89BAlaska, 2024: $53.78BAlaska, 2025: $56.34B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 59National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsAlaska · Southcentral Alaska earthquake disrupts homes, schools and infrastructure · 2018-11-30Southcentral Alaska earthquake disrupts homes, schools and infrastructureAlaska · Walker requests concurrence for earthquake disaster spending · 2018-12-02Earthquake spending requestAlaska · Walker signs the written earthquake disaster declaration · 2018-12-02Written earthquake declarationNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownAlaska · Dunleavy requests federal earthquake recovery assistance · 2019-01-03Dunleavy requests federal earthquake recovery assistanceAlaska · Dunleavy transmits the SB38 disaster funding proposal · 2019-01-25Dunleavy transmits the SB38 disaster funding proposalAlaska · SB38 disaster funding proposal introduced · 2019-01-28SB38 disaster funding proposal introducedAlaska · SBA makes earthquake loans available to Alaska businesses and residents · 2019-01-31SBA makes earthquake loans available to Alaska businesses and residentsAlaska · Earthquake finance plan estimates recovery costs · 2019-02-01Recovery finance estimateAlaska · SBA explains the separate Alaska nonprofit earthquake-loan program · 2019-02-05SBA explains the separate Alaska nonprofit earthquake-loan programAlaska · DOT commissioner approves additional earthquake emergency authorization · 2019-02-13DOT repair authorizationAlaska · Alaska reports earthquake-assistance registrations and loan approvals · 2019-03-07Alaska reports earthquake-assistance registrations and loan approvalsAlaska · Senate Finance adopts the SB38 disaster-funding substitute · 2019-03-14Senate Finance adopts the SB38 disaster-funding substituteAlaska · OMB responds on Alaska earthquake procurement and provides the DOT contract list · 2019-03-19OMB responds on Alaska earthquake procurement and provides the DOT contract listAlaska · Senate Finance reports the SB38 substitute · 2019-03-19Senate Finance reports the SB38 substituteAlaska · Alaska Senate passes SB38 · 2019-03-25Alaska Senate passes SB38Alaska · House Finance reports the SB38 substitute · 2019-03-28House Finance reports the SB38 substituteAlaska · Alaska Legislature passes SB38 disaster funding · 2019-03-29Alaska Legislature passes SB38 disaster fundingAlaska · Dunleavy approves SB38 disaster and fire-suppression appropriations · 2019-04-05Dunleavy approves SB38 disaster and fire-suppression appropriationsAlaska · SB38 disaster appropriations take effect · 2019-04-06SB38 disaster appropriations take effectAlaska · SBA reports $60,132,500 in Alaska earthquake loan approvals · 2019-05-01SBA reports $60,132,500 in Alaska earthquake loan approvalsAlaska · Recovery report separates FEMA grants and SBA loans · 2019-05-28Recovery report separates FEMA grants and SBA loansAlaska · Alaska earthquake recovery guidance separates continuing help from closed applications · 2019-06-05Alaska earthquake recovery guidance separates continuing help from closed applicationsAlaska · Swan Lake fire begins on the Kenai Peninsula · 2019-06-05Swan Lake fire begins on the Kenai PeninsulaNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsAlaska · McKinley fire begins near the Parks Highway · 2019-08-17McKinley fire begins near the Parks HighwayAlaska · Swan Lake fire escapes containment and crosses Sterling Highway · 2019-08-18Swan Lake fire escapes containment and crosses Sterling HighwayAlaska · Alaska reports wildfire school closures, sheltering and highway disruption · 2019-08-21Alaska reports wildfire school closures, sheltering and highway disruptionAlaska · Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster · 2019-08-23Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disasterAlaska · SBA declares disaster-loan assistance for Alaska’s McKinley fire · 2019-10-01SBA declares disaster-loan assistance for Alaska’s McKinley fireAlaska · SBA opens economic-injury loans for Alaska’s Swan Lake fire · 2019-10-08SBA opens economic-injury loans for Alaska’s Swan Lake fireAlaska · SBA fixes the Swan Lake fire loan incident period without changing the deadline · 2019-11-19SBA fixes the Swan Lake fire loan incident period without changing the deadlineNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● Alaska Legislature · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.● U.S. Congress · Alaska delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 62■ Alaska agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

6 of 6 reviewed Alaska actions match · 5 date markers shown. 59 major events shown separately.

Alaska · 2025: $56.34B · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alaska Real GDP · source units
PeriodAlaskaRankU.S. benchmark
2025$56.34B#48 of 50$23.94T
2024$53.78B#48 of 50$23.39T
2023$52.89B#48 of 50$22.72T
2022$50.38B#48 of 50$22.08T
2021$51.59B#48 of 50$21.56T
2020$50.94B#47 of 50$20.28T
2019$52.38B#47 of 50$20.72T
2018$52.48B#46 of 50$20.19T
2017$53.55B#46 of 50$19.61T
2016$53.46B#46 of 50$19.14T
2015$53.68B#46 of 50$18.8T
2014$53.3B#46 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alaska · state comparison

Alaska output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Alaska · 2025$56.34B
Alaska rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alaska
Real GDP history in Alaska$-3.53T$12T$27.53T20142025
2025 · Alaska: $56.34B · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alaska Real GDP history
PeriodAlaskaCompare
2014$53.3B
2015$53.68B
2016$53.46B
2017$53.55B
2018$52.48B
2019$52.38B
2020$50.94B
2021$51.59B
2022$50.38B
2023$52.89B
2024$53.78B
2025$56.34B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · $56.34B2025 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska · your comparison$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alaska · state comparison

What makes up Alaska GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Alaska’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Alaska · 2025$488.1M
Alaska rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alaska
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Alaska$-43.58B$146.93B$337.43B20142025
2025 · Alaska: $488.1M · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alaska Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodAlaskaCompare
2014$545.9M
2015$517M
2016$442.7M
2017$439.4M
2018$437.8M
2019$458.8M
2020$395.9M
2021$386.2M
2022$534.9M
2023$555.8M
2024$504.2M
2025$488.1M

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · $488.1M2025 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska · your comparison$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alaska · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Alaska · 2025472,008
Alaska rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alaska
Total employment · jobs history in Alaska-32,253,056109,377,850251,008,75520142025
2025 · Alaska: 472,008 · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alaska Total employment · jobs history
PeriodAlaskaCompare
2014461,385
2015461,726
2016457,170
2017455,590
2018454,834
2019454,876
2020430,999
2021443,151
2022454,175
2023461,595
2024466,539
2025472,008

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · 472,0082025 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska · your comparison472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Alaska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

8 statements from 5 candidates

2026 Alaska Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Treg Taylor

2 statements

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Economic growth & production context

By growing our economy, restoring discipline to government, and enshrining the PFD in our constitution, we can protect the PFD and move Alaska forward together.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Set PFD payments by affordability and add constitutional protection

Candidate campaign source

By growing our economy, restoring discipline to government, and enshrining the PFD in our constitution, we can protect the PFD and move Alaska forward together.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Treg Taylor — reviewed campaign biography, platform and past-work accounts ↗
View 1 more statement from Treg Taylor
Economic growth & production context

He will take on Juneau to cut waste, balance the budget, protect the PFD, make Alaska affordable again, and partner with President Trump to grow our economy so our kids can stay, work, and build their lives here.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut spending, balance the budget and protect the PFD

Government-published candidate material

He will take on Juneau to cut waste, balance the budget, protect the PFD, make Alaska affordable again, and partner with President Trump to grow our economy so our kids can stay, work, and build their lives here.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Treg Taylor — candidate-authored 2026 general-election pamphlet ↗

2026 Alaska Governor and Lieutenant Governor — Top-Four Primary

4 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Bill Walker

1 statement

Nonpartisan · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Economic growth & production context

Alaska urgently needs a fiscal plan. As Governor, I tackled a multi - billion - dollar budget deficit due to plummeting oil revenues and Senate Bill 21. We brought Alaskans together from every region and political background to develop a comprehensive plan focused on protecting es sential services w…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Government-published candidate material

Alaska urgently needs a fiscal plan. As Governor, I tackled a multi - billion - dollar budget deficit due to plummeting oil revenues and Senate Bill 21. We brought Alaskans together from every region and political background to develop a comprehensive plan focused on protecting es sential services while growing the economy. Painful but necessary cuts were required. We reduced dependence on oil revenues. Progress was made but critical work remains.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Bill Walker — official 2026 candidate-authored pamphlet statement ↗

Matt A. Heilala

1 statement

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Economic growth & production context

Alaska needs a governor who will fight for limited government and more local control. A governor who will veto taxes and remove regulatory roadblocks, so the private sector can grow our economy.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Why I'm Running

Candidate campaign source

Alaska needs a governor who will fight for limited government and more local control. A governor who will veto taxes and remove regulatory roadblocks, so the private sector can grow our economy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt A. Heilala — identity-verified candidate website 2 ↗

Meda DeWitt

2 statements

Nonpartisan · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Economic growth & production context

The Bottom Line: Alaska does not need to choose between fiscal responsibility and a thriving future. The Permanent Fund’s sustained yield, the salmon’s return, the land’s productivity, and the well-being of every community, rural, urban, Alaska Native, and newcomer alike are the same obligation, wri…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The Bottom Line: Alaska does not need to choose between fiscal responsibility and a thriving future. The Permanent Fund’s sustained yield, the salmon’s return, the land’s productivity, and the well-being of every community, rural, urban, Alaska Native, and newcomer alike are the same obligation, written into the same Constitution, owed to the same future generations. This administration will govern like it.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Meda DeWitt — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗
View 1 more statement from Meda DeWitt
Economic growth & production context

2. Manage Trawl Gear by the Impact It Actually Has: Federal analysis confirms pelagic trawl gear contacts the seafloor 40–100% of the time (NMFS, 2024). Alaska state law (5 AAC 39.105(10)(C)) defines pelagic trawl as gear that does not operate in contact with the seabed. West Coast federal regulatio…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

2. Manage Trawl Gear by the Impact It Actually Has: Federal analysis confirms pelagic trawl gear contacts the seafloor 40–100% of the time (NMFS, 2024). Alaska state law (5 AAC 39.105(10)(C)) defines pelagic trawl as gear that does not operate in contact with the seabed. West Coast federal regulations (50 CFR 660.11) require the same. The North Pacific definition is the outlier. Any net making sustained bottom contact must meet bottom-trawl regulatory standards regardless of classification. Salmon excluder devices must be mandatory fleet-wide. The NPFMC’s June 2025 deferral to industry self-reporting through a Gear Innovation Initiative, results not expected until April 2026, is insufficient when Oceana’s pending lawsuit alleges failure to protect essential fish habitat and the National Academy of Sciences has documented that bottom trawling reduces complexity, productivity, and biodiversity of benthic habitats (NRC, 2002).

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Meda DeWitt — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗

Shelley Hughes

2 statements

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Economic growth & production context

“As we work to access cheap energy which will spur tremendous economic growth, we must at the same time see that our students are ready for the opportunities that will be awaiting them due to that boom.”

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

“As we work to access cheap energy which will spur tremendous economic growth, we must at the same time see that our students are ready for the opportunities that will be awaiting them due to that boom.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Shelley Hughes — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗
View 1 more statement from Shelley Hughes
Economic growth & production context

Government cannot grow our economy. Growth comes from the ingenuity of individuals, the teamwork of innovators and investors, and the determination of hardworking Alaskans. The role of government is to create the conditions for success. That is why as your governor, I will be focused on accessing af…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Government cannot grow our economy. Growth comes from the ingenuity of individuals, the teamwork of innovators and investors, and the determination of hardworking Alaskans. The role of government is to create the conditions for success. That is why as your governor, I will be focused on accessing affordable energy, reducing regulatory and tax burdens, promoting innovation, and building the infrastructure our state needs. This is how we open doors to new opportunities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Shelley Hughes — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alaska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alaska incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alaska legislators and Alaska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alaska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Alaska incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Mike Dunleavy

Governor of Alaska · –AK

1 proposal
View proposals from Mike Dunleavy
Governor · Dunleavy transmits the SB38 disaster funding proposal

Dunleavy transmits the SB38 disaster funding proposal

Jan 25, 2019 · Proposal enacted as amended · approval April 5, 2019

Mike Dunleavy · Filed

Reviewed governor proposal and introduced bill

The January 28 Senate journal reproduces Governor Dunleavy’s transmittal letter dated January 25. SB38 was introduced January 28 by the Senate Rules Committee at his request. The original proposal sought fire-suppression, highway-repair and disaster-relief funding. Disaster unemployment assistance and an additional $1 million for noncovered surface transportation appear in the later enrolled version, not this introduced proposal. Senate Rules is the recorded committee sponsor; no individual legislator is assigned sponsorship here. Historical record. Current eligibility, later amendments, incorporated authorities, actual expenditures and measured effects require separate evidence.

Review selected proposal provisions (1 proposal section)

These describe the original introduced proposal selected for this topic. The later enacted version and actual funding are separate records.

  • Reviewed provision 2: Proposed highway disaster-repair authority for federal receipts actually received in FY2019–20, estimated at $65 million; $6.5 million general-fund match; $1 million general fund for uninsured earthquake damage to state facilities.
Review legislative changes and votes

Follow the original proposal, committee changes and historical votes. These records establish procedure and appropriations, not current eligibility, payments or policy effects.

What changed in committee

  • The original governor proposal had five sections. The Senate Finance substitute adds a new section 1 authorizing federal receipts actually received for disaster unemployment benefits in FY2019–20, estimated at $1 million.
  • The substitute adds $1 million in general funds for earthquake surface-transportation costs not reimbursed by federal receipts and clarifies the highway-repair appropriation purpose.
  • The substitute adds a separate capital-project lapse clause for transportation appropriations. Disaster relief fund capitalizations remain nonlapsing; the fire-suppression appropriation remains for FY2019.
  • The March 13 work draft was adopted March 14 and reported March 19. The offered substitute is dated March 20. Its funding amounts and operative wording match the enrolled law after disregarding punctuation, spacing and capitalization; the original documents retain minor punctuation and hyphenation differences.

How the bill advanced

  1. Jan 25, 2019 · Governor transmittal letter dated January 25; introduced January 28

    The Senate journal reproduces Dunleavy’s letter. Senate Rules Committee, by request of the governor, is the recorded sponsor; the Senate Finance Committee prepared the substitute.

  2. Jan 29, 2019 · Senate Finance hears and holds SB38

    The meeting also discusses SB39. Proposed education reductions, Medicaid and other regular supplemental items from SB39 are not provisions of SB38.

  3. Mar 14, 2019 · Senate Finance adopts work draft U

    Draft prepared March 13. Stedman’s discussion objection was removed; adoption proceeded without objection. Bill held for further consideration.

  4. Mar 19, 2019 · Senate Finance reports the substitute

    Four do-pass and four no-recommendation entries. Olson withdrew an objection after asking about procurement information. Report filed March 20.

  5. Mar 25, 2019 · Senate adopts substitute and passes SB38

    18 yea, 0 nay, 2 excused, 0 absent. Begich withdrew his objection to substitute adoption. The passage vote also serves as the effective-date vote; bill transmitted to the House.

  6. Mar 28, 2019 · House Finance reports the substitute

    Six do-pass and five no-recommendation entries. Report filed March 29. No recommendation does not mean a vote against the bill.

  7. Mar 29, 2019 · House passes SB38

    32 yea, 0 nay, 8 excused, 0 absent. The same passage vote also serves as the effective-date vote. Speaker and Chief Clerk sign the bill for return to the Senate.

  8. Apr 5, 2019 · Governor approval recorded

    The April 8 Senate journal records Dunleavy’s April 5 signature as Chapter 1, SLA2019, and an April 6 effective date. Legislative signatures and passage dates are separate from the governor signature.

Historical floor votes

Each chamber used its passage vote for the effective-date clause. These are 2 roll calls, with 60 member entries. Excused and absent members did not cast a vote.

Senate · Mar 25, 2019 · Final passage and effective-date clause · 18 yea, 0 nay, 2 excused, 0 absent

Final passage and effective-date clause. The journal records that this roll also serves as the effective-date vote.

Alaska SB38 · 2019 · Senate member votes at the time
Member as printedDistrictRecorded vote
Senator BegichJYea
Senator BirchMYea
Senator CoghillBYea
Senator CostelloKYea
Senator GiesselNYea
Senator HoffmanSYea
Senator HughesFYea
Senator KawasakiAYea
Senator KiehlQYea
Senator MiccicheOYea
Senator OlsonTYea
Senator ReinboldGYea
Senator ShowerEYea
Senator StedmanRYea
Senator StevensPYea
Senator von ImhofLYea
Senator WielechowskiHYea
Senator WilsonDYea
Senator BishopCExcused
Senator Gray-JacksonIExcused
Official Senate journal ↗ · Historical legislature roster ↗
House · Mar 29, 2019 · Final passage and effective-date clause · 32 yea, 0 nay, 8 excused, 0 absent

Final passage and effective-date clause. The journal records that this roll also serves as the effective-date vote.

Alaska SB38 · 2019 · House member votes at the time
Member as printedDistrictRecorded vote
Representative Carpenter29Yea
Representative Claman21Yea
Representative Drummond18Yea
Representative Eastman10Yea
Representative Edgmon37Yea
Representative Fields20Yea
Representative Foster39Yea
Representative Hannan33Yea
Representative Hopkins4Yea
Representative Johnson11Yea
Representative Johnston28Yea
Representative Josephson17Yea
Representative Knopp30Yea
Representative Kopp24Yea
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins35Yea
Representative LeBon1Yea
Representative LeDoux15Yea
Representative Merrick14Yea
Representative Ortiz36Yea
Representative Pruitt27Yea
Representative Rauscher9Yea
Representative Revak25Yea
Representative Shaw26Yea
Representative Spohnholz16Yea
Representative Story34Yea
Representative Talerico6Yea
Representative Tarr19Yea
Representative Thompson2Yea
Representative Tilton12Yea
Representative Tuck23Yea
Representative Wilson3Yea
Representative Wool5Yea
Representative Jackson13Excused
Representative Lincoln40Excused
Representative Neuman8Excused
Representative Rasmussen22Excused
Representative Stutes32Excused
Representative Sullivan-Leonard7Excused
Representative Vance31Excused
Representative Zulkosky38Excused
Official House journal ↗ · Historical legislature roster ↗

Committee recommendations

A recommendation is separate from a floor vote. “No recommendation” does not mean “nay.”

Senate Finance · 4 do pass, 4 no recommendation

Committee action Mar 19, 2019; report filed Mar 20, 2019.

  • Senator Stedman · district R · Do pass
  • Senator von Imhof · district L · Do pass
  • Senator Wilson · district D · Do pass
  • Senator Bishop · district C · Do pass
  • Senator Micciche · district O · No recommendation
  • Senator Shower · district E · No recommendation
  • Senator Wielechowski · district H · No recommendation
  • Senator Olson · district T · No recommendation
Official committee report ↗
House Finance · 6 do pass, 5 no recommendation

Committee action Mar 28, 2019; report filed Mar 29, 2019.

  • Representative Johnston · district 28 · Do pass
  • Representative LeBon · district 1 · Do pass
  • Representative Merrick · district 14 · Do pass
  • Representative Josephson · district 17 · Do pass
  • Representative Sullivan-Leonard · district 7 · Do pass
  • Representative Ortiz · district 36 · Do pass
  • Representative Carpenter · district 29 · No recommendation
  • Representative Tilton · district 12 · No recommendation
  • Representative Knopp · district 30 · No recommendation
  • Representative Wilson · district 3 · No recommendation
  • Representative Foster · district 39 · No recommendation
Official committee report ↗

Member names and districts are those printed in the 2019–20 legislature roster. Excused members did not cast a vote. Committee recommendations are separate from floor votes; no recommendation is not a nay. Historical votes do not establish current candidate positions or individual sponsorship. Committee attachments, historical regulations and actual spending remain under review.

Review funding and recovery documents

Committee documents explain the funding estimates and early recovery reports behind SB38. The reported payments and contract awards below precede its April 5 approval and do not establish spending caused by this law.

Funding estimates and reported balances

  • Original disaster-fund request basis: $21,901,714.90. Preliminary placeholder, before later refinement; the enacted amount is rounded to whole dollars.
  • State-only IA estimate removed from preliminary share: $9,689,505.96. Subtracting this estimate yields the revised $12,212,208.94 state share. The request retained a reserve for future disasters.
  • Unallocated fund balance as of March 5: $362,932.33. Agency-reported figure includes a pending $1 million storm allocation increase needing legislative approval.
  • Existing earthquake allocation: $6.5 million. Allocation within the disaster fund, separate from SB38’s $6.5 million highway match.
  • Combined encumbrances and expenditures: $4.2 million. Reported against that existing earthquake allocation; the combined figure is not all paid expenditure.
  • Unobligated earthquake allocation balance: $2.3 million. Reported remaining amount. March 30 and April 1 depletion dates were forecasts, not confirmed outcomes.
Official supporting document ↗

The March 14 slides show $139.304 million in proposed supplemental funding and $148.304 million in the gross line table. The $9 million difference corresponds to existing federal disaster-fund authority. It must not be counted again as new funding. The separate $1 million transportation and $1 million federal unemployment additions appear on the amendments slide.

March 14 budget presentation ↗

Early payments reported by the agency

  • State individual-assistance grants: $314,310.02. Reported paid to 24 recipients in the response to March 5 questions.
  • State temporary housing: $272,686.40. Reported paid; both state assistance streams were suspended pending federal programs.
Official supporting document ↗

These are contemporaneous agency reports, not independently audited invoices or final disaster totals. Later payments, eligibility decisions and completed repairs need separate evidence.

Updated March 14 assistance estimates

The table prints total assistance of $58,904,047.71, including a $12,212,208.94 state share and $46,691,838.77 federal share. These are estimates, not grants received or paid.

The temporary-housing row prints $353,706, while the earlier enclosure prints $365,706. The updated individual-assistance rows sum to $10,779,649.71, which is $12,000 below their printed $10,791,649.71 subtotal. The discrepancy remains unresolved; no source value has been silently changed.

Updated estimate table ↗

March 7 recovery status

The status update reports 14,401 state individual-assistance applications, 5,355 FEMA registrations and SBA approvals for 191 home loans and 13 business loans. Loan approvals are separate from payments.

The Legislative Finance response reports 14,673 state applications; the scope or vintage difference is unresolved. The state deadline extension to February 28 is agency-reported, with its original signed record still under review. A planned request to extend federal registration to May 31 was prospective, not an approved extension. The later signed March 18 request and March 22 FEMA approval are now reviewed in the assistance-deadline records below.

March 7 status update ↗
Assistance deadlines and reconsideration

The signed March 18 request and March 22 FEMA approval resolve the earlier prospective federal extension. State applications, FEMA registration, unemployment aid and reconsideration have separate dates and conditions.

  1. January 28, 2019 report · State application window extended to February 28

    DHS&EM reports the extension already in place. It does not identify the original signed extension date. The February 28 flyer and later reconsideration notices confirm the deadline.

  2. February 14, 2019 · State and federal applications remain separate

    The joint notice explains separate FEMA registration even for existing state applicants. Federal ineligibility does not itself guarantee state assistance.

  3. March 9 notice · March 14 application deadline · Disaster unemployment assistance available before SB38 approval

    The notice describes FEMA-funded, state-administered aid for eligible earthquake-affected workers, including self-employed workers. Up to 35 weeks beginning December 2 is a possible benefit period, not proof of payment. SB38’s later federal-receipts appropriation did not establish this program’s first availability.

  4. March 15, 2019 · Existing state applicants can request reconsideration

    The agency describes reconsideration after FEMA determination/appeal and SBA assistance or denial, with evidence of remaining essential needs. It does not reopen the February 28 new-application window.

  5. March 18, 2019 · Dunleavy signs the federal registration-extension request

    The signed two-page letter asks FEMA to move the April 1 deadline to May 31 because of separate-program confusion and damage emerging during spring thaw. His hope for an SBA extension is separate from an SBA approval.

  6. March 22, 2019 · FEMA approves the extension to May 31

    Regional administrator Michael F. O’Hare authorizes a 60-day extension for all areas designated for individual assistance. Christopher B. Smith is the memorandum’s recipient. This changes the registration deadline; it is not a payment award.

  7. April 18, 2019 · Recovery centers and appeal help remain available

    The visible snapshot confirms the May 31 deadline and describes recovery centers in Anchorage, Eagle River and Wasilla, assistance with appeals and SBA loans, and mitigation visits. These are historical services, not proof of completed repairs.

  8. April 25, 2019 printed notice · Spring-thaw damage can amend existing state claims

    The state urges reinspection and reassessment of essential home needs and reconsideration after the federal and insurance processes. New state claims had closed February 28. The archive lists April 24; the notice itself prints April 25.

  9. May 1 release · April 30 figures · Reported approvals remain distinct from payments

    The release reports over $11.6 million in FEMA grants and $59.9 million in SBA loans approved, totaling over $71.5 million. These are approvals, not money paid or all grants. The archive lists May 8. FEMA registration remains due by midnight May 31.

Historical 2019 records. The original state extension and SBA authorization, full applicable rules and actual payments remain under review. March 18’s reported 14,594 state applications and 5,254 FEMA registrations differ from earlier reports and are not a reconciled series. April 18’s extracted approval figures are absent from the visible page, so they are excluded here.

Reported DOT earthquake contracts · 15 contracts · $7,274,000 ceiling

The 15 listed contracts total $7,274,000 in not-to-exceed ceilings, not actual payments. EMR25192-0013 prints October 11, 2018, before the earthquake; its date remains unresolved. Original contracts, written procurement determinations, invoices and final spending are still under review. This DOT list is separate from the future DMVA list promised in the March 19 response.

Agency-reported sole-source contracts · ceilings, not payments
ContractAward date as printedProjectContractorNot-to-exceed amount
EMR25192-000112/10/2018Minnesota SE off rampKnick Construction Co$350,000
EMR25192-000212/10/2018Dimond at 100th rampKnick Construction Co$90,000
EMR25192-000312/6/2018Minnesota NW off rampGranite Construction Co$250,000
EMR25192-000412/13/2018Clark-Wolverine Road MP 5.5Cruz Construction$300,000
EMR25192-000512/7/2018Seward Highway: 36th to TudorNeeser Construction$400,000
EMR25192-000612/7/2018Pittman RoadQAP$250,000
EMR25192-000712/13/2018Glenn-Parks interchangeCruz Construction$400,000
EMR25192-000812/7/2018C/Dowling intersection and C at Campbell CreekQAP$110,000
EMR25192-000912/6/2018Glenn Highway Mirror LakeMass Excavation$3,000,000
EMR25192-001012/10/2018NB/SB Glenn and Briggs bridgesKiewit Infrastructure West Co$600,000
EMR25192-001112/13/2018Glenn Highway MP 55.0 and 58.5Cruz Construction$300,000
EMR25192-001212/10/2018Glenn Highway MP 29.3QAP$200,000
EMR25192-001310/11/2018 · date unresolvedEagle River Road new Prudhoe Bay AvenueQAP$24,000
EMR25192-001412/18/2018Willow Fishhook MP 44QAP$350,000
EMR25192-001512/13/2018Vine Road MP 2.5Northern Asphalt Construction, Inc$650,000
DOT contractor list ↗ · March 19 OMB response ↗

The procurement method report and preapproval request are blank forms revised in September 2015. They are not completed transaction reports or approved requests. The handout’s cited federal rules and thresholds require separate historical verification.

Browse the 14 reviewed attachments
  • HB 53 3.8.19 OMB Response.pdf ↗

    March 22, 2019; responds to March 8 questions · Donna Arduin, OMB director; signed on page 4

    House budget response includes WWAMI, Head Start, village public safety and earthquake insurance. Page 3 describes covered state buildings and exclusions for nonstructure assets; regular pay excluded and overtime possibly eligible. Program descriptions are not SB38 provisions. The named disaster-fund spreadsheet and Moore settlement agreement are absent from this four-page file. Body spreadsheet label SFY16–SFY19 differs from attachment list SFY16–SFY16.

  • HFC 3.8.19 HB 53 - FY2019 Disaster Relief Supplemental Overview.pdf ↗

    March 8, 2019 · Donna Arduin and Lacey Sanders, Office of Management and Budget

    Eight-slide HB53 presentation, a separate House bill. Original supplemental summary $139.304 million versus gross line table $148.304 million differs by the existing $9 million federal DRF authority; do not count that base twice. Separate slide proposes $1 million general-fund noncovered transportation and $1 million federal disaster unemployment authority. April 1 fund depletion is a forecast, not a verified event. FY2014–FY2018 chart lacks exact labeled values; no invented series extracted.

  • SB 38 - DR4413 Cook Inlet Earthquake Initial Finance Plan 3.19.19.pdf ↗

    February 1, 2019 in body; March 19 handout label · Initial DR4413 finance plan

    Total $108,921,608.16 estimate, federal $48,740,264.79 and state $60,181,343.37. PA, hazard mitigation, IA/temporary housing and management costs use different scopes from preliminary enclosures. March 19 filename does not turn the February 1 plan into a new plan. These are estimates rather than actual funding, awards or payments; some printed intermediate cells differ by rounding cents.

  • SB 38 DOTPF Prime Contractor - Sole Sourced - Earthquake Responders.pdf ↗

    Attached to March 19 OMB response; individual reported award dates retained · DOT&PF contractor table

    Fifteen reported sole-source prime-contract rows, $7,274,000 total not-to-exceed ceilings. One row prints October 11, 2018, before the November 30 earthquake. Preserve the raw date and unresolved discrepancy; do not create a pre-earthquake repair event or silently change it to December. Original contracts, written determinations, invoices and final expenditures are absent.

  • SB 38 Procurement Handout - DMVA.pdf ↗

    Undated handout attached to March 19 response · DMVA procurement guidance

    Four pages describe contracting, competition, recordkeeping and cost analysis. Cites 44 CFR 13.36 and a $100,000 simplified threshold. Applicable historical federal rules, transition and grant terms have not been independently verified; do not present this as current law or evidence that actual procurements complied.

  • SB 38 3.1419.19 OMB Response.pdf ↗

    March 19, 2019 · Donna Arduin, OMB director; signed on page 3

    Responds to Senate Finance March 14 and March 19 questions. Quotes state emergency procurement and FHWA manual requirements; original applicable authorities remain unread. Describes early PA program and over 110 people trained, not an audited roster. Future DMVA sole-source list is promised, not delivered here. Four named procurement attachments are now separately reviewed. Signature is Arduin, not the governor printed on the letterhead.

  • SB 38 Procurement Method Report for Disaster Grants as of Sept 15 - DMVA.pdf ↗

    Blank form; revision September 2015 · DMVA procurement method report template

    Two-page blank form with procurement methods, supporting-document requirements and certification. The file label as of Sept 15 is not a completed September 15 transaction report. Empty vendor, jurisdiction, amount and approval fields do not establish any award or compliance.

  • SB 38 Request for Pre-Approval of Sole Source and Above $50000 Procurement For.._.pdf ↗

    Blank form; revision September 2015 · DMVA preapproval request template

    Two-page blank request for sole-source/noncompetitive procurement or purchases above $50,000. Blank certification and approval fields establish no approved procurement. Thresholds are historical handout descriptions; original legal authority remains separate.

  • SB 38 Updated Amounts - Disaster Supplemental.pdf ↗

    Handwritten provided by OMB, March 14, 2019 · Updated assistance estimate table

    Printed IA total $10,791,649.71; PA $48,112,398; grand $58,904,047.71, state $12,212,208.94, federal $46,691,838.77. Temporary housing prints $353,706 in both total/federal cells, whereas original enclosure shows $365,706. Printed IA rows sum to $10,779,649.71, $12,000 below the printed subtotal; retain discrepancy rather than changing the source. ONA state $184,109.44 and federal $552,328.31. No actual payments or enacted change demonstrated.

  • SFC 3.14.19 FY2019 Supplemental Overview SB 38 - Disaster Relief Supplem.._.pdf ↗

    March 14, 2019 · Lacey Sanders, OMB budget director

    Nine-slide SB38 presentation. $139.304 million original supplemental summary and $148.304 million gross line table differ by existing $9 million federal fund authority. Proposed $1 million noncovered transportation and $1 million federal unemployment additions are separate; later enacted wording remains controlling. July 1 fund-balance chart has seven exact labeled values for 2012–2018, not a current balance or spending series. March 5 balance rounded to $362,900; forecast April 1 depletion not verified. Presentation is not a governor signature.

  • SB 38 Enclosure A B to Major Disaster Request.pdf ↗

    Preliminary enclosures A/B; no newly dated approval · Two scanned disaster request estimate tables

    Temporary housing total $365,706, repair $9,419,641.96, replacement $269,864 and ONA federal share $552,328.31. Generic other-program catalog with TBD entries does not establish DUA/legal/crisis activation. Public assistance preliminary total $48,112,398. Standalone Kenai utility cell $50,000 differs from original full request typo $50,0000; preserve source variant. Engineering Enclosure E is absent.

  • SB 38 Work Draft Version U.pdf ↗

    March 13, 2019 work draft U · Legislative drafting copy

    Two complete operative pages of the six-section Finance work draft. Already compared to offered/enrolled versions in the legislative-chain review. A supporting copy does not establish new adoption, signature or effective date.

  • SB 38 03.07.2019 - Disaster Response Process and Status Update - FINAL.pdf ↗

    Status pages 5–6 as of March 7, 2019; process narrative pages 1–4 · DMVA disaster process and status update

    Agency description of authorities, program eligibility and state/federal agreement, not originals of statutes/rules/agreement. Reports 14,401 state IA applications, 5,355 FEMA registrations and SBA approvals of 191 home and 13 business loans; approvals are not disbursements. State deadline February 28 attributed to governor extension without original signed extension/date. April 1 federal registration deadline current as of report; future May 31 extension request prospective, not approved. No repayment or program-cap rules certified as current.

  • DRF FY19 Supplemental LFD Inquiry Response 3.7.19 Final.pdf ↗

    March 7 file label; response to March 5 questions and March 5 fund balances · DMVA response to Legislative Finance

    Original $21,901,714.90 placeholder less $9,689,505.96 state-only IA estimate equals $12,212,208.94 revised state share; request maintains reserve for future disasters. Unallocated DRF $362,932.33 includes a pending $1 million storm funding increase needing legislative approval. Separate earthquake allocation $6.5 million with combined encumbrances/expenditures $4.2 million and unobligated $2.3 million; none interchangeable with SB38 highway-match appropriation. Reported 24 state grant recipients paid $314,310.02, temporary housing paid $272,686.40; further payments suspended pending federal programs. Reported 14,673 IA applications differs from March 7 status update 14,401; scopes/vintages unreconciled. 67 PA requests and $60 million-plus projected state costs are not awards or spending. March 30/April 1 depletion projections not confirmed. Historical eligibility/caps/management cost descriptions require separate original authority review.

All 14 attachments listed on the retained bill-history page have been read. Referenced originals, missing spreadsheet and settlement attachments, audio, historical and current rules, later spending and completed recovery remain under review. HB53 and unrelated budget-program proposals are separate from SB38.

SBA loan programs and deadlines

SBA earthquake loans are separate from FEMA grants and Alaska appropriations. The two January 31 declarations cover different applicant groups and have different economic-injury deadlines. Issuance, publication, application deadlines, approvals and payments are separate records.

Original 2019 earthquake declarations · separate application deadlines
ProgramApplicantsOriginal physical-loss deadlineEconomic-injury deadline
Businesses and residents · AK00040Eligible homeowners, renters, businesses and private nonprofitsApril 1, 2019November 1, 2019
Certain private nonprofits · AK00041Private nonprofits providing essential services of a governmental natureApril 1, 2019October 31, 2019
Businesses and residents · AK00040 · areas and conditions

Declaration 15859/15860 was issued January 31 and published February 12. The three primary areas are designated for physical-damage and economic-injury loans; the seven contiguous areas are economic-injury only. SBA assesses individual eligibility, financial condition and loan terms. The June 5 agency report separately says the individual physical-damage deadline was May 31; the original extension instrument has not been located.

Primary areas: Kenai Peninsula Borough; Matanuska-Susitna Borough; Municipality of Anchorage.

Contiguous areas · economic injury only: Chugach REAA; Copper River REAA; Delta/Greely REAA; Denali Borough; Iditarod Area REAA; Kodiak Island Borough; Lake and Peninsula Borough.

Certain private nonprofits · AK00041 · areas and conditions

Separate public-assistance-only declaration 15861/15862, issued January 31 and published February 12. FEMA briefings assess essential governmental service / critical-facility eligibility; a referral to SBA is not a guaranteed loan or grant. The February 5 announcement and March 1 reminder retain April 1 / October 31. A later deadline extension for this specific nonprofit program has not been verified.

Primary areas: Kenai Peninsula Borough; Matanuska-Susitna Borough; Municipality of Anchorage.

Historical earthquake loan terms

Historical 2019 earthquake terms: business/private-nonprofit physical loans up to $2 million; homeowner primary-residence loans up to $200,000; homeowner/renter personal-property loans up to $40,000. Terms could extend up to 30 years, depending on the applicant. Economic-injury working-capital aid could be available without property damage; the nonprofit notice names payroll, fixed debts and bills. These are historical program descriptions and limits, not current rates or guaranteed awards.

AK00040 original rates · January 31, 2019 notice
BorrowerLoanCredit available elsewhereRate
HomeownersPhysical damageYes4.000%
HomeownersPhysical damageNo2.000%
BusinessesPhysical damageYes7.480%
BusinessesPhysical damageNo3.740%
Private nonprofitsPhysical damageYes2.750%
Private nonprofitsPhysical damageNo2.750%
Businesses / small agricultural cooperativesEconomic injuryNo3.740%
Private nonprofitsEconomic injuryNo2.750%
  1. April 15, 2019 · SBA reports $51,708,500 in loan approvals

    The release reports $3,902,000 approved for businesses plus $47,806,500 for residents. Their sum is $51,708,500. Approved loans are distinct from grants and actual disbursements.

  2. May 1, 2019 · SBA reports $60,132,500 in loan approvals

    The release reports $4,461,600 for businesses plus $55,670,900 for residents, totaling $60,132,500. The earlier joint report uses an April 30 snapshot of $59.9 million in SBA approvals. These are separate cumulative snapshots; do not add them or count them as money paid.

  3. June 5, 2019 · Agency report confirms the individual physical-loss deadline was May 31

    The joint fact sheet’s SBA section explicitly reports May 31 for individuals with physical damage and November 1 for business economic injury. It describes help with existing applications, appeals and approved-loan closing after new FEMA registration ended. This later agency report does not supply the original SBA extension date or signatory and does not establish that the separate nonprofit program was extended. The body prints June 5 and FS008; filename FS011 and the prior archive listing May 28 differ.

  4. June 5, 2019 · Recovery resources include counseling and housing advice

    The historical fact sheet identifies crisis counseling, aging/disability resource centers, environmental advice for homeowners and low-income landlord/tenant legal clinics in the earthquake recovery areas. Pending state reconsideration, FEMA appeals and SBA loan assistance have separate processes. A resource listing does not establish service use, completed repairs or payments.

These are historical federal SBA records, not new governor measures or operative sections added to SB38. Original extension authority, full historical eligibility rules, later amendments and actual loan disbursements remain under review. These records do not establish changes caused by assistance in GDP, income, employment, health or housing prices.

The governor proposal led to Chapter 1, SLA2019 as amended: final passage March 29, governor signature April 5 and effectiveness April 6. The January 28 Senate journal reproduces Governor Dunleavy’s transmittal letter dated January 25. SB38 was introduced January 28 by the Senate Rules Committee at his request. The original proposal sought fire-suppression, highway-repair and disaster-relief funding. Disaster unemployment assistance and an additional $1 million for noncovered surface transportation appear in the later enrolled version, not this introduced proposal. Senate Rules is the recorded committee sponsor; no individual legislator is assigned sponsorship here. Historical record. Current eligibility, later amendments, incorporated authorities, actual expenditures and measured effects require separate evidence.

Why this record is included

The introduced proposal finances disaster repairs to highways and state facilities; this is proposed infrastructure restoration, not measured output growth.

Retained Alaska evidence context: housing-borrowing · reviewed policy-topic context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy-topic context · education · reviewed policy-topic context · real-gdp · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The January 28 Senate journal reproduces Governor Dunleavy’s transmittal letter dated January 25. SB38 was introduced January 28 by the Senate Rules Committee at his request. The original proposal sought fire-suppression, highway-repair and disaster-relief funding. Disaster unemployment assistance and an additional $1 million for noncovered surface transportation appear in the later enrolled version, not this introduced proposal. Senate Rules is the recorded committee sponsor; no individual legislator is assigned sponsorship here.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alaska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alaska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.