Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages11%2024 · #5 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 6512.7%2024 · #6 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6566.8%2024 · #41 of 50 · highest first
Alaska over time
Explore Alaska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alaska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alaska effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alaska change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages Alaska · source units
AlaskaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
10 of 10 reviewed Alaska actions match · 10 date markers shown. 46 major events shown separately.
Alaska · 2024: 11% · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Alaska · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
Alaska · 202411%
Alaska rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alaska
2024 · Alaska: 11% · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alaska Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
Alaska
Compare
2014
17.2%
2015
14.9%
2016
14%
2017
13.7%
2018
12.6%
2019
12.2%
2020
Not available
2021
11.4%
2022
11%
2023
10.4%
2024
11%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 11%2024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska · your comparison
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio
6.7%
—
#32
Washington
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Alaska’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.
This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Alaska with every state.
Alaska · 2020$13,642
Alaska rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alaska
2020 · Alaska: $13,642 · Rank #2 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alaska Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
Alaska
Compare
2014
$10,535
2015
$11,460
2016
$11,761
2017
$12,303
2018
$12,695
2019
$13,226
2020
$13,642
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · $13,6422020 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska · your comparison
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
Alaska · 202275.8 years
Alaska rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Alaska population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alaska
2022 · Alaska: 75.8 years · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alaska Life expectancy at birth history
Period
Alaska
Compare
2018
78 years
2019
77.7 years
2020
76.6 years
2021
74.5 years
2022
75.8 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 75.8 years2022 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska · your comparison
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
Alaska · 20238.2%
Alaska rank#43among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alaska
2023 · Alaska: 8.2% · Rank #43 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alaska Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
Alaska
Compare
2019
7.2%
2020
7.4%
2021
8.1%
2022
8.5%
2023
8.2%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 8.2%2023 · Rank #43 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 7.4% – 9.2%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Mississippi
15.1%
95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1
West Virginia
15.1%
95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3
Louisiana
14.6%
95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4
Alabama
14%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5
Arkansas
13.1%
95% CI: 12–14.3
#6
South Carolina
12.7%
95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6
Tennessee
12.7%
95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8
Texas
12.1%
95% CI: 11–13.3
#9
Indiana
11.7%
95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10
Georgia
11.5%
95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10
Ohio
11.5%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12
Oklahoma
11.3%
95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13
Delaware
11.1%
95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14
North Carolina
11%
95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15
Illinois
10.9%
95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15
Maryland
10.9%
95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15
Michigan
10.9%
95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18
Nevada
10.8%
95% CI: 8.9–13
#18
New Mexico
10.8%
95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20
Missouri
10.7%
95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20
South Dakota
10.7%
95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22
California
10.6%
95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23
Kansas
10.5%
95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24
Virginia
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25
Florida
10.1%
95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26
Rhode Island
10%
95% CI: 9.1–11
#27
Arizona
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27
Iowa
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29
Nebraska
9.7%
95% CI: 9–10.3
#30
Wisconsin
9.6%
95% CI: 9–10.2
#31
Hawaii
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31
New York
9.5%
95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31
Oregon
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34
Wyoming
9.4%
95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35
Minnesota
9.3%
95% CI: 8.6–10
#36
New Jersey
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37
Maine
9%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
North Dakota
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39
Idaho
8.7%
95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40
Washington
8.6%
95% CI: 8.2–9
#41
Massachusetts
8.5%
95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42
Connecticut
8.4%
95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43
Alaska · your comparison
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44
Utah
8.1%
95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45
Colorado
8%
95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46
Montana
7.9%
95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46
New Hampshire
7.9%
95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48
Vermont
7.8%
95% CI: 7–8.7
—
Kentucky
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Pennsylvania
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
Alaska · June 30, 202648.9%
Alaska rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 48.9%June 30, 2026 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska · your comparison
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
Alaska · 2020$8,635
Alaska rank#1among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · $8,6352020 · Rank #1 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska · your comparison
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
Alaska · 2023–202424%
Alaska rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alaska · 24%2023–2024 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska · your comparison
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
10 of 10 reviewed Alaska actions · newest first
Mar 11, 2026 · SB 206 · An Act relating to reports of harassment, intimidation, or bullying in schools; relating to parental notification of incidents of harassment, intimidation, or bullying involving students and threats of suicide by students; and establishing the firearm safe storage grant fund. · Pending · Senate FinanceAlaska Legislature · SB 206
An Act relating to reports of harassment, intimidation, or bullying in schools; relating to parental notification of incidents of harassment, intimidation, or bullying involving students and threats of suicide by students; and establishing the firearm safe storage grant fund.
Mar 11, 2026 · Pending · Senate Finance
Sen. Loki Tobin · Sponsored / Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
CSSB 206(HSS) proposes a firearm safe-storage grant fund that the Department of Administration could use to buy devices for free distribution to school districts and district-administered hunter or firearm safety programs. The fund would receive appropriations, grants and donations. The bill also addresses suicide resources in parental notifications. It remains in Senate Finance and does not establish actual funding, distributions or a mortality change.
Official bill page lists Senate Finance with status date 2026-03-11. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide and other intents. Safe-storage devices and suicide resources concern access to firearms and a subset of these deaths; creating a fund would not itself establish funding, device distribution or fewer deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 14.33.240. Parental notification. A school district may adopt a plan to notify the parents or guardians of a student of an incident of harassment, intimidation, or bullying involving the student or a threat of suicide by the student. A school district that notifies a parent or guardian about a threat of suicide under this section shall provide to the parent or guardian suicide prevention and crisis intervention resources, including information about how to (1) obtain a suicide risk screening or assessment from a health care professional; (2) limit a student's access to firearms and lethal medications; (3) securely store firearms, ammunition, and lethal medications, including in a safe storage device; and (4) request a free safe storage device from the firearm safe storage grant fund established under AS 44.21.070.
[…]
Sec. 44.21.070. Firearm safe storage grant fund. (a) The firearm safe storage grant fund is established in the general fund. The department shall manage the fund and may use money in the fund without further appropriation to purchase firearm safe storage devices and distribute the devices at no cost to school districts or to hunter or firearm safety programs that are administered by a school district. Money in the fund does not lapse. The fund consists of money appropriated to the fund, including grant money the department receives for the purpose of providing to school districts firearm safe storage devices and funds to purchase firearm safe storage devices, and donations to the fund. (b) Nothing in this section creates a dedicated fund. (c) The department may adopt regulations under AS 44.62 (Administrative Procedure Act) to implement this section. (d) In this section, (1) "department" means the Department of Administration; (2) "firearm safe storage device" means a lock box, safe, cable lock, or other device that is used to prevent unauthorized access to a firearm or to store a firearm.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 23, 2026 · HB 326 · An Act relating to abortion-inducing drugs. · Pending · House Health and Social ServicesAlaska Legislature · HB 326
An Act relating to abortion-inducing drugs.
Feb 23, 2026 · Pending · House Health and Social Services
Rep. Kevin McCabe · Sponsored / Rep. Steve St. Clair · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 326 proposes requiring an in-person physical examination before a provider prescribes, dispenses or administers an abortion-inducing drug, plus a follow-up appointment scheduled within 14 days after the abortion. It also removes the exception for physicians prescribing under AS 08.64.364(a). The bill remains in House Health and Social Services in the checked record; these proposed requirements are not enacted.
Official bill page lists House Health and Social Services with status date 2026-02-23. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
The fact counts reported induced terminations. The proposal directly addresses abortion-inducing medication, a subset of those procedures. It is not enacted and cannot explain the earlier 2025 count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: Induced terminations occurring in Alaska. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
* Section 1. AS 08.64.364(c) is amended to read: (c) Notwithstanding (a) and (b) of this section, (1) a physician may not prescribe, dispense, or administer an abortion- inducing drug under (a) of this section ; and (2) a physician or physician assistant may not prescribe, dispense, or administer a prescription drug in response to an Internet questionnaire or electronic mail message to a person with whom the physician or physician assistant does not have a prior physician-patient relationship.
[…]
* Sec. 2. AS 18.16.010 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (k) A health care provider that prescribes, dispenses, or administers an abortion-inducing drug to a person shall (1) conduct an in-person physical examination of the person before prescribing, dispensing, or administering the abortion-inducing drug; and (2) schedule a follow-up appointment, to occur not later than 14 days after the abortion, to confirm that the pregnancy was terminated and assess continued blood loss.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 25, 2025 · HB 151 · An Act relating to continuous eligibility for medical assistance for children under six years of age; and providing for an effective date. · Pending · House FinanceAlaska Legislature · HB 151
An Act relating to continuous eligibility for medical assistance for children under six years of age; and providing for an effective date.
CSHB 151(HSS) proposes continuous medical-assistance eligibility until age six for a child found eligible before age six. Implementation would depend on federal approval, or a determination that approval is unnecessary, by July 1, 2027. The bill retains discretionary shorter continuity for older children. It remains in House Finance, so its conditional eligibility provision has not taken effect through this bill.
Official bill page lists House Finance with status date 2025-04-25. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Children under six are a subset of the under-65 population in the uninsured fact. Eligibility continuity concerns retention of coverage for eligible children, not automatic coverage for every child or a measured decrease in uninsured residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
* Section 1. AS 47.07.020(i) is amended to read: (i) The department shall allow a person under six years of age who is determined to be eligible for benefits under this chapter to remain eligible for those benefits until the person is six years old. The department may allow a person who is at least six years of age but not over 19 years of age and who is determined to be eligible for benefits under this chapter to remain eligible for those benefits for up to 11 calendar months following the month that the person is determined eligible for benefits or until the person is 19 years old, whichever occurs earlier. * Sec. 2. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read: MEDICAID STATE PLAN; WAIVERS. The Department of Health shall, as necessary for federal approval by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, submit amendments to the state plan for medical assistance coverage or apply for any waivers necessary to implement AS 47.07.020(i), as amended by sec. 1 of this Act. * Sec. 3. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read: CONDITIONAL EFFECT; NOTIFICATION. (a) Section 1 of this Act takes effect only if, on or before July 1, 2027, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (1) approves the waivers or amendments to the state plan for medical assistance coverage submitted in accordance with sec. 2 of this Act; or (2) determines that approval of the waivers and amendments to the state plan for medical assistance coverage submitted in accordance with sec. 2 of this Act is not necessary. (b) The commissioner of health shall notify the revisor of statutes in writing within 30 days after the United States Department of Health and Human Services approves the waivers or amendments to the state plan or determines that approval of the waivers and amendments is not necessary under this section. * Sec. 4. If sec. 1 of this Act takes effect, it takes effect on the day after the date the United States Department of Health and Human Services approves the waivers or amendments to the state plan or determines that approval of the waivers and amendments is not necessary.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 26, 2019 · DNR commissioner extends Alaska’s 2019 fire season · DNR commissioner extends Alaska’s 2019 fire season · Historical agency instrument issuedAlaska agencies · DNR commissioner extends Alaska’s 2019 fire season
DNR commissioner extends Alaska’s 2019 fire season
Aug 26, 2019 · Historical agency instrument issued
Corri Feige · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed original signed instrument
DNR Commissioner Corri Feige signed a public order effective August 26, 2019 at noon extending the fire season through September 30. Burn permits and separate local/state closures continued to apply. This is a historical agency action; governor letterhead does not make it a governor signature, appropriation or regulation adopted by the legislature.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision R1: DNR commissioner extends the designated 2019 fire season through September 30. Signed order is effective August 26 at 12 PM; the unusual printed label is “Alaska Daily Standard Time.” Issued by Corri Feige, not the governor.
Reviewed provision R2: Cites the burn-permit requirement and fire-risk findings, and states failure to obey is grounds for prosecution under AS 41.15.140. Historical statutory/regulatory versions remain under review; no new criminal statute is enacted.
Reviewed provision R3: The separate August 26 DNR release says open-debris/burn-barrel permits remain required through September 30 and the August 21 Mat-Su/Kenai open-burning closure remains in force. Gas/pellet or canister devices are treated separately. The extension grants no blanket permission to burn.
DNR Commissioner Corri Feige signed a public order effective August 26, 2019 at noon extending the fire season through September 30. Burn permits and separate local/state closures continued to apply. This is a historical agency action; governor letterhead does not make it a governor signature, appropriation or regulation adopted by the legislature.
Why this record is included
The signed DNR order cites public safety and response capacity as reasons to extend fire-season permitting. It is a historical agency order, not a governor signature or verified health outcome.
Retained Alaska evidence context: health · reviewed policy-topic context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
DNR Commissioner Corri Feige signed a public order effective August 26, 2019 at noon extending the fire season through September 30. Burn permits and separate local/state closures continued to apply. This is a historical agency action; governor letterhead does not make it a governor signature, appropriation or regulation adopted by the legislature.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 23, 2019 · Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster · Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster · Governor instrument signedGovernor · Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster
Dunleavy declares the Mat-Su and Kenai wildfire disaster
Aug 23, 2019 · Governor instrument signed
Mike Dunleavy · Signed
Reviewed original signed instrument
On August 23, 2019 Governor Mike Dunleavy signed a disaster declaration for Mat-Su and Kenai Peninsula boroughs, authorizing available funds for Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Temporary Housing and disaster administration. It includes Swan Lake, Willow/Caswell and two additional Homer-area fires. The signed original preserves local scope, delegated coordination and damaged utilities; final recovery and payments are unverified.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision R1: Declares a disaster emergency August 23 in Mat-Su and Kenai Peninsula boroughs. Recitals cover Willow/Caswell fires, Swan Lake burning since June 5 and escaping containment August 18, and two additional August 17-18 fires near Homer/Anchor Point.
Reviewed provision R2: Authorizes DMVA to use funds made available for necessary Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Temporary Housing and administrative/disaster-management expenses. Eligibility, award and payment remain separate.
Reviewed provision R3: Designates the DMVA commissioner or designee state coordinator and permits necessary agency tasking under the State Emergency Operations Plan and enumerated statutory powers. Those historical authorities and their exercise need separate review.
Reviewed provision R4: Reports home/property damage, evacuation and sheltering, additional response labor/equipment costs, highway disruption and power/natural-gas/communication infrastructure requiring repair. These are emergency findings, not final totals or measured economic outcomes.
On August 23, 2019 Governor Mike Dunleavy signed a disaster declaration for Mat-Su and Kenai Peninsula boroughs, authorizing available funds for Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Temporary Housing and disaster administration. It includes Swan Lake, Willow/Caswell and two additional Homer-area fires. The signed original preserves local scope, delegated coordination and damaged utilities; final recovery and payments are unverified.
Why this record is included
The disaster declaration supports emergency protective response. The accompanying official release describes assistance for disaster-related medical expenses; authorization does not prove medical payments or health improvements.
Retained Alaska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy-topic context · health · reviewed policy-topic context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy-topic context · income-taxes · reviewed policy-topic context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy-topic context · real-gdp · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
On August 23, 2019 Governor Mike Dunleavy signed a disaster declaration for Mat-Su and Kenai Peninsula boroughs, authorizing available funds for Public Assistance, Individual Assistance, Temporary Housing and disaster administration. It includes Swan Lake, Willow/Caswell and two additional Homer-area fires. The signed original preserves local scope, delegated coordination and damaged utilities; final recovery and payments are unverified.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 23, 2019 · Alaska insurance director issues wildfire medication-access guidance · Alaska insurance director issues wildfire medication-access guidance · Historical agency instrument issuedAlaska agencies · Alaska insurance director issues wildfire medication-access guidance
Alaska insurance director issues wildfire medication-access guidance
Aug 23, 2019 · Historical agency instrument issued
Lori Wing-Heier · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed original signed instrument
Insurance Director Lori Wing-Heier signed Bulletin19-12 on August 23, 2019. It expects health insurers to accommodate early/emergency medication refills and local retail access for wildfire evacuees without extra authorization or penalties. It is agency guidance; compliance and actual medication delivery are unverified.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision R1: Directs guidance to insurers authorized to transact health insurance in Alaska, citing emergency authority AS 21.06.080(d). Original signed August 23 by Insurance Director Lori Wing-Heier; historical authority remains under review.
Reviewed provision R2: Expects early refills/replacement of lost or damaged medication through the wildfire season, emergency supplies without extra authorization and local-retail prescription access without penalty when normally mail-ordered. The bulletin does not verify insurer compliance, prescriptions dispensed or a new appropriation.
Insurance Director Lori Wing-Heier signed Bulletin19-12 on August 23, 2019. It expects health insurers to accommodate early/emergency medication refills and local retail access for wildfire evacuees without extra authorization or penalties. It is agency guidance; compliance and actual medication delivery are unverified.
Why this record is included
The original insurance bulletin specifically addresses prescription access for wildfire evacuees. It establishes historical agency guidance, not delivered treatment, a governor signature or measured medical outcomes.
Retained Alaska evidence context: health · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Insurance Director Lori Wing-Heier signed Bulletin19-12 on August 23, 2019. It expects health insurers to accommodate early/emergency medication refills and local retail access for wildfire evacuees without extra authorization or penalties. It is agency guidance; compliance and actual medication delivery are unverified.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Alaska officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Alaska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
51 statements from 17 candidates
2026 Alaska Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements
Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Care & public health
Introduce structured career and trades exposure by middle school, alongside core academics • Focus on awareness, not early lock-in—students learn what careers look like before choosing a path • Provide hands-on introductions to construction trades, mechanics, electrical, welding, aviation, maritime,…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Introduce career and trade exploration in middle school
Candidate campaign source
Introduce structured career and trades exposure by middle school, alongside core academics • Focus on awareness, not early lock-in—students learn what careers look like before choosing a path • Provide hands-on introductions to construction trades, mechanics, electrical, welding, aviation, maritime, healthcare support roles, and public safety careers • Teach practical skills such as problem-solving, teamwork, safety, basic tool use, and applied math • Present trades and technical careers as skilled, respected, and high-opportunity options equal in dignity to traditional college paths
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Support appropriate scopes of practice for healthcare practitioners such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, optometrists, and dental health aides.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Support appropriate scopes of practice for healthcare practitioners
Candidate campaign source
Support appropriate scopes of practice for healthcare practitioners such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, optometrists, and dental health aides.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Care & public health
Access to quality healthcare, including mental health and substance abuse treatment, is one of the most critical needs facing Alaska's veterans. Too many of our heroes are waiting months for appointments, traveling hundreds of miles for specialist care, or falling through the cracks of a federal sys…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Healthcare and Mental Health
Candidate campaign source
Access to quality healthcare, including mental health and substance abuse treatment, is one of the most critical needs facing Alaska's veterans. Too many of our heroes are waiting months for appointments, traveling hundreds of miles for specialist care, or falling through the cracks of a federal system not designed for Alaska's geography. I will work to expand access through telemedicine, state-federal partnerships, and innovative delivery models that bring care to veterans wherever they live in Alaska. I will also pursue meaningful synergies between the VA and Alaska's state health systems to eliminate duplication and improve outcomes.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Nonpartisan · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Health coverage
3. To address recidivism and survivor safety, we will implement automatic Medicaid re-enrollment upon release, require discharge planning starting 90 days before release, and HHS and DOJ will collaborate to develop treatment and recovery pathways.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
3. To address recidivism and survivor safety, we will implement automatic Medicaid re-enrollment upon release, require discharge planning starting 90 days before release, and HHS and DOJ will collaborate to develop treatment and recovery pathways.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The Governor will direct the Attorney General to assess legal options, join or file appropriate litigation, and submit supplemental state bridge funding for districts most dependent on federal dollars. Alaska cannot wait for Washington to fix this.7. Reduce Chronic Absenteeism: More than 44,000 Alas…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education
Candidate campaign source
The Governor will direct the Attorney General to assess legal options, join or file appropriate litigation, and submit supplemental state bridge funding for districts most dependent on federal dollars. Alaska cannot wait for Washington to fix this.7. Reduce Chronic Absenteeism: More than 44,000 Alaska students were chronically absent last year. The root causes, food insecurity, housing instability, lack of transportation, and untreated behavioral health needs, are cross-agency problems that no single department can solve alone. Issue an Administrative Order establishing aligned plans for social services and civil rights enforcement by improving inter-agency coordination of all departments tasked with supporting Alaska’s youth. To close the achievement gap or a literacy gap, students need to be present. 8. Expand Land-Based & Community Learning: Including Food, Nutrition & School Meals: Provide free breakfast and lunch for every Alaska student; no applications, no stigma, no child going hungry at school. Hunger is one of the most documented barriers to learning. Universal school meals eliminate the gap.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
6. Require LGBTQ+ Affirming Care Training for Behavioral Health Providers and First Responders. LGBTQ+ Alaskans experience higher rates of suicidality, substance use, and victimization, with much of the disparity driven by stigma and provider discomfort rather than identity itself (Institute of Medi…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice
Candidate campaign source
6. Require LGBTQ+ Affirming Care Training for Behavioral Health Providers and First Responders. LGBTQ+ Alaskans experience higher rates of suicidality, substance use, and victimization, with much of the disparity driven by stigma and provider discomfort rather than identity itself (Institute of Medicine, 2011; Russell & Fish, 2016). Affirming, competent providers save lives. I will direct the Department of Health and the Department of Public Safety to establish standardized LGBTQ+ affirming care training for behavioral health providers, peace officers, Village Public Safety Officers, dispatchers, and emergency responders, developed in partnership with LGBTQ+ Alaskans and Two-Spirit knowledge keepers.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
1. What We Will Do: We will automatically enroll every eligible Alaska child in Denali KidCare using data the state already collects through the Permanent Fund Dividend application; no separate application needed, and we will apply the same approach to eligible adults. We will redirect administrativ…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
1. What We Will Do: We will automatically enroll every eligible Alaska child in Denali KidCare using data the state already collects through the Permanent Fund Dividend application; no separate application needed, and we will apply the same approach to eligible adults. We will redirect administrative savings to community health aides, behavioral health workers, and telehealth services in communities that currently lack them. We will fund preventive screenings, tobacco cessation, and medication-assisted treatment as essential fiscal investments.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
3. Support communities that need to relocate on their own timeline: Direct DCRA, DOTPF, DNR, and DHSS by Administrative Order to follow community-led relocation protocols, the community’s plan determines the schedule, not the state’s convenience. Assign a Governor’s Climate Community Liaison for New…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
3. Support communities that need to relocate on their own timeline: Direct DCRA, DOTPF, DNR, and DHSS by Administrative Order to follow community-led relocation protocols, the community’s plan determines the schedule, not the state’s convenience. Assign a Governor’s Climate Community Liaison for Newtok/Mertarvik, Shishmaref, Shaktoolik, Napakiak, Kivalina, and other relocating communities. Use CARE data principles in relocation planning. Incorporate behavioral health, including climate grief and solastalgia treatment, into every relocation plan as a required element, not optional. Publicly report progress, timelines, and barriers annually.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
5. Protect Mental Health When the Home Itself Is Changing: Fund climate behavioral health services, partner with Tribal health organizations for rural delivery of services. Establish regional grants focused on climate behavioral health, prioritizing communities experiencing managed retreat, relocati…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
5. Protect Mental Health When the Home Itself Is Changing: Fund climate behavioral health services, partner with Tribal health organizations for rural delivery of services. Establish regional grants focused on climate behavioral health, prioritizing communities experiencing managed retreat, relocation, or severe subsistence loss. Connect climate grief to the ACE screening and trauma-informed care framework, acknowledging that environmental displacement worsens existing trauma. Ensure that the RISE program’s behavioral health component addresses solastalgia among young people in affected communities (see education section). Train educators in climate-aware social-emotional learning.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
5. Ban Conversion Therapy Statewide. Anchorage led in 2020 by banning conversion therapy for minors, the first city in Alaska to do so. Every major medical and mental health association has rejected this practice as harmful. I will support and sign a statewide ban so that no young Alaskan, regardles…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
5. Ban Conversion Therapy Statewide. Anchorage led in 2020 by banning conversion therapy for minors, the first city in Alaska to do so. Every major medical and mental health association has rejected this practice as harmful. I will support and sign a statewide ban so that no young Alaskan, regardless of where they live, is subjected to it.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
5. For prevention, we will treat unaddressed trauma as the public health and fiscal crisis it is. Untreated trauma drives addiction, suicide, and incarceration. Evidence-based trauma treatment costs $2,000 to $8,000 per person. The downstream cost of doing nothing is nearly $20,000 per person per ye…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
5. For prevention, we will treat unaddressed trauma as the public health and fiscal crisis it is. Untreated trauma drives addiction, suicide, and incarceration. Evidence-based trauma treatment costs $2,000 to $8,000 per person. The downstream cost of doing nothing is nearly $20,000 per person per year in lost workforce, lost health, and lost life. Prevention is not more expensive than reaction. It is dramatically cheaper and the only approach that actually works.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK
Health coverage
Reduce Medicaid rolls and costs through training able-bodied recipients for good jobs and transitioning individuals to step down coverage. Build our needed workforce while opening doors for individuals to successful and fulfilling lives free of government dependence.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Reduce Medicaid rolls and costs through training able-bodied recipients for good jobs and transitioning individuals to step down coverage. Build our needed workforce while opening doors for individuals to successful and fulfilling lives free of government dependence.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
• Expand DenaliCare to cover working Alaskans caught between Medicaid and unaffordable private plans, while reducing uncompensated ER care that drives up costs for everyone. • Negotiate lower prescription drug prices by bypassing pharmacy benefit managers and establishing a board to negotiate direct…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reviving The Alaska Dream
Candidate campaign source
• Expand DenaliCare to cover working Alaskans caught between Medicaid and unaffordable private plans, while reducing uncompensated ER care that drives up costs for everyone. • Negotiate lower prescription drug prices by bypassing pharmacy benefit managers and establishing a board to negotiate directly with manufacturers, cutting out middlemen who inflate what we pay at the pharmacy. • Increase telehealth access for rural Alaska by expanding broadband partnerships and tele-specialty networks so Alaskans can see a provider without a $2,000 plane ticket. Geography should not be a death sentence. • Grow our healthcare workforce from within by supporting union healthcare workers serving Alaskan communities, expanding nursing and behavioral health training at the University of Alaska, and strengthening loan repayment programs. • Improve behavioral healthcare access by expanding mental health and substance misuse services so Alaskans can access care before crises occur.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
Schools are closing. The future of the PFD – and even the Permanent Fund itself – could be in doubt. Grocery and fuel costs are rising. Health care is expensive and hard to access. And young Alaskans are fleeing to the Lower 48, never to return.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Additional Current Priorities
Candidate campaign source
Schools are closing. The future of the PFD – and even the Permanent Fund itself – could be in doubt. Grocery and fuel costs are rising. Health care is expensive and hard to access. And young Alaskans are fleeing to the Lower 48, never to return.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
I support expanding Medicaid coverage and extending federal healthcare subsidies that are keeping costs from spiking, and I want to see more caps on prescription drug prices.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Expand Medicaid and healthcare subsidies and cap drug prices
Candidate campaign source
I support expanding Medicaid coverage and extending federal healthcare subsidies that are keeping costs from spiking, and I want to see more caps on prescription drug prices.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I oppose short-sighted tariffs that are driving up prices. I’ll vote to keep healthcare costs from skyrocketing. And I’ll fight to bring new housing and energy projects to Alaska to bring those costs down, too.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Oppose tariffs and expand housing and energy projects to lower costs
Candidate campaign source
I oppose short-sighted tariffs that are driving up prices. I’ll vote to keep healthcare costs from skyrocketing. And I’ll fight to bring new housing and energy projects to Alaska to bring those costs down, too.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Crucially, Nick is helping start a larger conversation about health, not just health care. It is about longevity, prevention, personal responsibility, innovation, and giving families better choices so we can bring down costs by curing diseases and living healthier lives.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Prioritize prevention, health innovation and family choices
Candidate campaign source
Crucially, Nick is helping start a larger conversation about health, not just health care. It is about longevity, prevention, personal responsibility, innovation, and giving families better choices so we can bring down costs by curing diseases and living healthier lives.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alaska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Alaska incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alaska legislators and Alaska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alaska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Alaska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
CSHB 151(HSS) proposes continuous medical-assistance eligibility until age six for a child found eligible before age six. Implementation would depend on federal approval, or a determination that approval is unnecessary, by July 1, 2027. The bill retains discretionary shorter continuity for older children. It remains in House Finance, so its conditional eligibility provision has not taken effect through this bill.
Official bill page lists House Finance with status date 2025-04-25. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Children under six are a subset of the under-65 population in the uninsured fact. Eligibility continuity concerns retention of coverage for eligible children, not automatic coverage for every child or a measured decrease in uninsured residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
* Section 1. AS 47.07.020(i) is amended to read: (i) The department shall allow a person under six years of age who is determined to be eligible for benefits under this chapter to remain eligible for those benefits until the person is six years old. The department may allow a person who is at least six years of age but not over 19 years of age and who is determined to be eligible for benefits under this chapter to remain eligible for those benefits for up to 11 calendar months following the month that the person is determined eligible for benefits or until the person is 19 years old, whichever occurs earlier. * Sec. 2. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read: MEDICAID STATE PLAN; WAIVERS. The Department of Health shall, as necessary for federal approval by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, submit amendments to the state plan for medical assistance coverage or apply for any waivers necessary to implement AS 47.07.020(i), as amended by sec. 1 of this Act. * Sec. 3. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read: CONDITIONAL EFFECT; NOTIFICATION. (a) Section 1 of this Act takes effect only if, on or before July 1, 2027, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (1) approves the waivers or amendments to the state plan for medical assistance coverage submitted in accordance with sec. 2 of this Act; or (2) determines that approval of the waivers and amendments to the state plan for medical assistance coverage submitted in accordance with sec. 2 of this Act is not necessary. (b) The commissioner of health shall notify the revisor of statutes in writing within 30 days after the United States Department of Health and Human Services approves the waivers or amendments to the state plan or determines that approval of the waivers and amendments is not necessary under this section. * Sec. 4. If sec. 1 of this Act takes effect, it takes effect on the day after the date the United States Department of Health and Human Services approves the waivers or amendments to the state plan or determines that approval of the waivers and amendments is not necessary.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Kevin McCabeAlaska Legislature · HB 326
An Act relating to abortion-inducing drugs.
Feb 23, 2026 · Pending · House Health and Social Services
Rep. Kevin McCabe · Sponsored / Rep. Steve St. Clair · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 326 proposes requiring an in-person physical examination before a provider prescribes, dispenses or administers an abortion-inducing drug, plus a follow-up appointment scheduled within 14 days after the abortion. It also removes the exception for physicians prescribing under AS 08.64.364(a). The bill remains in House Health and Social Services in the checked record; these proposed requirements are not enacted.
Official bill page lists House Health and Social Services with status date 2026-02-23. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
The fact counts reported induced terminations. The proposal directly addresses abortion-inducing medication, a subset of those procedures. It is not enacted and cannot explain the earlier 2025 count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: Induced terminations occurring in Alaska. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
* Section 1. AS 08.64.364(c) is amended to read: (c) Notwithstanding (a) and (b) of this section, (1) a physician may not prescribe, dispense, or administer an abortion- inducing drug under (a) of this section ; and (2) a physician or physician assistant may not prescribe, dispense, or administer a prescription drug in response to an Internet questionnaire or electronic mail message to a person with whom the physician or physician assistant does not have a prior physician-patient relationship.
[…]
* Sec. 2. AS 18.16.010 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (k) A health care provider that prescribes, dispenses, or administers an abortion-inducing drug to a person shall (1) conduct an in-person physical examination of the person before prescribing, dispensing, or administering the abortion-inducing drug; and (2) schedule a follow-up appointment, to occur not later than 14 days after the abortion, to confirm that the pregnancy was terminated and assess continued blood loss.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Loki TobinAlaska Legislature · SB 206
An Act relating to reports of harassment, intimidation, or bullying in schools; relating to parental notification of incidents of harassment, intimidation, or bullying involving students and threats of suicide by students; and establishing the firearm safe storage grant fund.
Mar 11, 2026 · Pending · Senate Finance
Sen. Loki Tobin · Sponsored / Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
CSSB 206(HSS) proposes a firearm safe-storage grant fund that the Department of Administration could use to buy devices for free distribution to school districts and district-administered hunter or firearm safety programs. The fund would receive appropriations, grants and donations. The bill also addresses suicide resources in parental notifications. It remains in Senate Finance and does not establish actual funding, distributions or a mortality change.
Official bill page lists Senate Finance with status date 2026-03-11. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide and other intents. Safe-storage devices and suicide resources concern access to firearms and a subset of these deaths; creating a fund would not itself establish funding, device distribution or fewer deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Alaska evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 14.33.240. Parental notification. A school district may adopt a plan to notify the parents or guardians of a student of an incident of harassment, intimidation, or bullying involving the student or a threat of suicide by the student. A school district that notifies a parent or guardian about a threat of suicide under this section shall provide to the parent or guardian suicide prevention and crisis intervention resources, including information about how to (1) obtain a suicide risk screening or assessment from a health care professional; (2) limit a student's access to firearms and lethal medications; (3) securely store firearms, ammunition, and lethal medications, including in a safe storage device; and (4) request a free safe storage device from the firearm safe storage grant fund established under AS 44.21.070.
[…]
Sec. 44.21.070. Firearm safe storage grant fund. (a) The firearm safe storage grant fund is established in the general fund. The department shall manage the fund and may use money in the fund without further appropriation to purchase firearm safe storage devices and distribute the devices at no cost to school districts or to hunter or firearm safety programs that are administered by a school district. Money in the fund does not lapse. The fund consists of money appropriated to the fund, including grant money the department receives for the purpose of providing to school districts firearm safe storage devices and funds to purchase firearm safe storage devices, and donations to the fund. (b) Nothing in this section creates a dedicated fund. (c) The department may adopt regulations under AS 44.62 (Administrative Procedure Act) to implement this section. (d) In this section, (1) "department" means the Department of Administration; (2) "firearm safe storage device" means a lock box, safe, cable lock, or other device that is used to prevent unauthorized access to a firearm or to store a firearm.
Only current Alaska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alaska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Alaska snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Alaska, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.