Alaska · individual fact

Alaska prices and inflation

Compare Alaska’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Alaska CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level102.42024 · #13 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level106.32024 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level93.82024 · #21 of 50 · highest first

Alaska over time

Explore Alaska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alaska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alaska effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alaska change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Alaska · source units
AlaskaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 102.499102.5105.9Alaska, 2014: 102.4Alaska, 2015: 103.3Alaska, 2016: 104.1Alaska, 2017: 104.8Alaska, 2018: 104.6Alaska, 2019: 103Alaska, 2020: 101.3Alaska, 2021: 104.9Alaska, 2022: 102.1Alaska, 2023: 103.3Alaska, 2024: 102.4201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Alaska Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · Alaska delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Alaska agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-06-30

2 of 2 reviewed Alaska actions match · 2 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Alaska · 2024: 102.4 · Rank #13 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Alaska with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alaska All-items price level · source units
PeriodAlaskaRankU.S. benchmark
2024102.4#13 of 50100
2023103.3#12 of 50100
2022102.1#14 of 50100
2021104.9#8 of 50100
2020101.3#14 of 50100
2019103#11 of 50100
2018104.6#9 of 50100
2017104.8#10 of 50100
2016104.1#10 of 50100
2015103.3#11 of 50100
2014102.4#11 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alaska · state comparison

How does Alaska’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Alaska · 2024102.4
Alaska rank#13among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Alaska with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alaska
All-items price level history in Alaska99.3102.5105.620142024
2024 · Alaska: 102.4 · Rank #13 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alaska All-items price level history
PeriodAlaskaCompare
2014102.4
2015103.3
2016104.1
2017104.8
2018104.6
2019103
2020101.3
2021104.9
2022102.1
2023103.3
2024102.4

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · 102.42024 · Rank #13 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska · your comparison102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alaska · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Alaska · 20241.7%
Alaska rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alaska
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Alaska-1.8%3.6%9%20152024
2024 · Alaska: 1.7% · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alaska Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodAlaskaCompare
20151.1%
20161.8%
20172.5%
20181.8%
2019-0%
2020-0.6%
20217.8%
20223.7%
20235%
20241.7%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · 1.7%2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska · your comparison1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alaska · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Alaska · 2024$60,272
Alaska rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alaska
Real personal income per person history in Alaska$45.77K$53.97K$62.16K20142024
2024 · Alaska: $60,272 · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alaska Real personal income per person history
PeriodAlaskaCompare
2014$55,480
2015$56,528
2016$54,411
2017$54,022
2018$55,403
2019$56,834
2020$58,522
2021$57,677
2022$58,413
2023$58,204
2024$60,272

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alaska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alaska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alaska · $60,2722024 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alaska with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska · your comparison$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Alaska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

29 statements from 17 candidates

2026 Alaska Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Dave Bronson

3 statements

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

CPI / inflation mention

Replace discretionary draw decisions with a formula-based POMV rule: The annual draw shall be the lesser of: 4.5% of the Fund’s average market value, or The Fund’s actual rolling five-year nominal return minus CPI inflation.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Set a formula limiting annual Permanent Fund withdrawals

Candidate campaign source

Replace discretionary draw decisions with a formula-based POMV rule: The annual draw shall be the lesser of: 4.5% of the Fund’s average market value, or The Fund’s actual rolling five-year nominal return minus CPI inflation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Reforming the permanent fund through a Modern Endowment Model — Bronson–Church campaign document ↗
View 2 more statements from Dave Bronson
CPI / inflation mention

The Governor’s Office, OMB, and Finance will: Review submissions for completeness and consistency. Identify duplication across departments. Compare administrative overhead ratios. Flag programs that grew faster than population or inflation, expanded without statutory direction, or show declining out…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Review duplication across agencies and redirect budget savings

Candidate campaign source

The Governor’s Office, OMB, and Finance will: Review submissions for completeness and consistency. Identify duplication across departments. Compare administrative overhead ratios. Flag programs that grew faster than population or inflation, expanded without statutory direction, or show declining outcomes. Departments may be directed to revise submissions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Zero-Based Budgeting — Bronson–Church campaign document ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

I will unleash aggressive resource development, expand access to land and housing, lower energy costs, build infrastructure, and create an economy where workers, tradesmen, miners, fishermen, small businesses, and families thrive again.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Expand resource development, housing access and infrastructure

Government-published candidate material

I will unleash aggressive resource development, expand access to land and housing, lower energy costs, build infrastructure, and create an economy where workers, tradesmen, miners, fishermen, small businesses, and families thrive again.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dave Bronson — candidate-authored 2026 general-election pamphlet ↗

Democrat · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Support development of all energy sources — renewables, hydro, natural gas — to lower utility bills for Alaskans.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Coordinate utilities and build renewable energy to lower bills

Candidate campaign source

Support development of all energy sources — renewables, hydro, natural gas — to lower utility bills for Alaskans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins — campaign platform ↗

2026 Alaska Governor and Lieutenant Governor — Top-Four Primary

8 candidates with matching statements · 11 statements

Bill Walker

2 statements

Nonpartisan · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

“The gasline is not simply an energy project,” Walker said. “It is Alaska’s economic future. Thousands of jobs. New long-term revenue. Lower energy costs. New opportunities for communities across Alaska. We cannot continue to let politics and changing administrations stall Alaska’s future.”

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: “We’re not running to manage decline,” Hoffbeck said. “We’re running to grow Alaska again.”

Candidate campaign source

“The gasline is not simply an energy project,” Walker said. “It is Alaska’s economic future. Thousands of jobs. New long-term revenue. Lower energy costs. New opportunities for communities across Alaska. We cannot continue to let politics and changing administrations stall Alaska’s future.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Bill Walker — identity-verified candidate website 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Bill Walker
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

For decades, I’ve worked on energy issues, including advancing the Alaska gasline project and securing agreements with international buyers that put Alaska’s gasline on the global stage. I will protect Alaskans from rising energy costs while continuing to advance the gasline project.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Government-published candidate material

For decades, I’ve worked on energy issues, including advancing the Alaska gasline project and securing agreements with international buyers that put Alaska’s gasline on the global stage. I will protect Alaskans from rising energy costs while continuing to advance the gasline project.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Bill Walker — official 2026 candidate-authored pamphlet statement ↗

Click Bishop

1 statement

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Affordable Energy Affordable energy is the foundation of a stronger Alaska. Lowering energy costs helps families, supports businesses, creates jobs, and strengthens our economy. As Governor, I will prioritize responsible energy development and invest in infrastructure that delivers reliable, afforda…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Government-published candidate material

Affordable Energy Affordable energy is the foundation of a stronger Alaska. Lowering energy costs helps families, supports businesses, creates jobs, and strengthens our economy. As Governor, I will prioritize responsible energy development and invest in infrastructure that delivers reliable, affordable power across our state while increasing refined fuel capacity to improve Alaska’s energy security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Click Bishop — official 2026 candidate-authored pamphlet statement ↗

Undeclared · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

The Jones Act from World War 1 must end! “The cost of shipping from Los Angeles to Alaska has been higher than the cost of shipping the same product from Los Angeles to Shanghai. An absence of domestic port-to-port shipping is an occasional distortion for the US mainland, but it’s a systemic economi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation, infrastructure, and connectivity

Candidate campaign source

The Jones Act from World War 1 must end! “The cost of shipping from Los Angeles to Alaska has been higher than the cost of shipping the same product from Los Angeles to Shanghai. An absence of domestic port-to-port shipping is an occasional distortion for the US mainland, but it’s a systemic economic impediment for places like Alaska. This raises the cost of living on Alaska and makes Alaska an unattractive place to produce goods bound for the US mainland.” -Vox

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Destry J. Sr. Payne — identity-verified candidate website ↗

Edna DeVries

1 statement

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Reduce energy costs for Alaska families and businesses

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Reduce energy costs for Alaska families and businesses

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Edna DeVries — identity-verified candidate website 3 ↗

Meda DeWitt

1 statement

Nonpartisan · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

CPI / inflation mention

Restore mandatory inflation proofing as the first charge against any draw, before dividends or government spending.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Restore mandatory inflation proofing as the first charge against any draw, before dividends or government spending.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Meda DeWitt — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗

Shelley Hughes

2 statements

Republican · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

“Natural gas for the railbelt and for export is essential. But in a state with 3 million lakes and 12,000 rivers, I will also work to harness hydro to a greater degree. If we add hydro power to what will be abundant natural gas power, it will lower our energy costs to such a degree that we’ll be com…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

“Natural gas for the railbelt and for export is essential. But in a state with 3 million lakes and 12,000 rivers, I will also work to harness hydro to a greater degree. If we add hydro power to what will be abundant natural gas power, it will lower our energy costs to such a degree that we’ll be competitive with the lower 48. Adding microreactors to the mix may make sense.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Shelley Hughes — identity-verified candidate website 4 ↗
View 1 more statement from Shelley Hughes
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

We'll put our fiscal house in order, drive down energy costs, diversify our economy, open Alaska's land and resources to Alaskans, and build infrastructure that good jobs require. My plan and steps are at my website: AlaskansforHughes.com/issues.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Government-published candidate material

We'll put our fiscal house in order, drive down energy costs, diversify our economy, open Alaska's land and resources to Alaskans, and build infrastructure that good jobs require. My plan and steps are at my website: AlaskansforHughes.com/issues.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Shelley Hughes — official 2026 candidate-authored pamphlet statement ↗

Tom Begich

2 statements

Democrat · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · AK

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

• Expand DenaliCare to cover working Alaskans caught between Medicaid and unaffordable private plans, while reducing uncompensated ER care that drives up costs for everyone. • Negotiate lower prescription drug prices by bypassing pharmacy benefit managers and establishing a board to negotiate direct…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reviving The Alaska Dream

Candidate campaign source

• Expand DenaliCare to cover working Alaskans caught between Medicaid and unaffordable private plans, while reducing uncompensated ER care that drives up costs for everyone. • Negotiate lower prescription drug prices by bypassing pharmacy benefit managers and establishing a board to negotiate directly with manufacturers, cutting out middlemen who inflate what we pay at the pharmacy. • Increase telehealth access for rural Alaska by expanding broadband partnerships and tele-specialty networks so Alaskans can see a provider without a $2,000 plane ticket. Geography should not be a death sentence. • Grow our healthcare workforce from within by supporting union healthcare workers serving Alaskan communities, expanding nursing and behavioral health training at the University of Alaska, and strengthening loan repayment programs. • Improve behavioral healthcare access by expanding mental health and substance misuse services so Alaskans can access care before crises occur.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Tom Begich — validated position source ↗
View 1 more statement from Tom Begich
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Energy costs in Alaska are among the highest in the country, especially for heating. Families should not be paying some of the highest bills in America while living in an energy-rich state.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reviving The Alaska Dream

Candidate campaign source

Energy costs in Alaska are among the highest in the country, especially for heating. Families should not be paying some of the highest bills in America while living in an energy-rich state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Tom Begich — validated position source ↗

2026 Alaska U.S. House — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Bill Hill

2 statements

Nonpartisan · U.S. House · AK

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

I’m running to lower our fuel costs and bring energy bills down. I will go to bat for getting the most out of our oil and natural gas, and restore tax credits to bring online new renewable projects.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Develop oil and gas and restore renewable-energy tax credits

Candidate campaign source

I’m running to lower our fuel costs and bring energy bills down. I will go to bat for getting the most out of our oil and natural gas, and restore tax credits to bring online new renewable projects.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bill's Platform - Bill Hill for Alaskans ↗
View 1 more statement from Bill Hill
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

I support expanding Medicaid coverage and extending federal healthcare subsidies that are keeping costs from spiking, and I want to see more caps on prescription drug prices.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Expand Medicaid and healthcare subsidies and cap drug prices

Candidate campaign source

I support expanding Medicaid coverage and extending federal healthcare subsidies that are keeping costs from spiking, and I want to see more caps on prescription drug prices.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bill's Platform - Bill Hill for Alaskans ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alaska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alaska incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alaska legislators and Alaska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alaska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Alaska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. Cathy Giessel

Alaska Senate · R–AK

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Cathy Giessel
Alaska Legislature · SB 32

An Act relating to costs incurred by certain electric utilities for renewable energy and battery energy storage.

Jan 22, 2025 · Pending · Senate Resources

Sen. Cathy Giessel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 32 proposes requiring specified costs to be allowed in the rates of electric cooperatives organized under AS 10.25 that participate in a certificated electric reliability organization. The costs must be approved by the utility’s board and concern a new or purchased renewable-energy facility or battery storage system with nameplate capacity below 15,000 kilowatts, or power purchased from such facilities or systems. The bill remains in Senate Resources and does not establish a rate change.

Official bill page lists Senate Resources with status date 2025-01-22. No enactment in the checked 34th-Legislature record as of September 10, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

The fact measures the average retail electricity price. Recovery of qualifying utility costs in customer rates is a price-setting component; this proposed rule neither sets a statewide price nor demonstrates cheaper electricity. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Alaska evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(i) Costs incurred by an electric cooperative utility organized under AS 10.25 that participates in an electric reliability organization certificated by the commission under AS 42.05.760 must be allowed in the rates charged by the utility if the costs are approved by the utility's board of directors in connection with a new or purchased renewable energy facility or battery energy storage system with a nameplate capacity of less than 15,000 kilowatts or power purchased from a renewable energy facility or battery energy storage system with a nameplate capacity of less than 15,000 kilowatts. In this subsection, "renewable energy facility" means a facility that generates electricity from geothermal, wind, solar, hydroelectric, hydrokinetic, tidal, or biomass energy or another renewable energy resource.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Kelly Merrick

Alaska Senate · R–AK

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Kelly Merrick
Alaska Legislature · SB 164

An Act eliminating deductions for the remittance of the motor fuel tax, tobacco taxes, and tire fees; relating to discounts on cigarette stamps; and providing for an effective date.

Jun 18, 2026 · Enacted · Without governor signature

Sen. Kelly Merrick · Sponsored / Rep. Dan Saddler · Cross-sponsored / Rep. Sara Hannan · Cross-sponsored / Rep. Andy Josephson · Cross-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 164 became Chapter 14, SLA 2026 without the governor’s signature on June 18, 2026, effective July 1. Its fuel provision removes the allowance to retain 1% of monthly motor-fuel tax and refined-fuel surcharge, capped at $100, for timely accounting and filing. Bracketed text in the excerpt is the deleted allowance. This changes remittance costs, not the per-gallon tax rate; tobacco and tire provisions are outside this gasoline connection.

Became law without the governor’s signature June 18, 2026: Chapter 14, SLA 2026. Effective July 1, 2026. The journal entry is June 19; it records a June 18 event.

Why this record is included

The gasoline fact is a West Coast excluding California proxy covering Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington. The law changes the amount Alaska fuel dealers or users retain when remitting tax and surcharge; it does not raise the per-gallon tax rate or establish that the lost allowance was passed through into pump prices or changed the four-state average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Alaska evidence context: West Coast excluding California regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

* Section 1. AS 43.40.013 is amended to read: Sec. 43.40.013. Collection of the refined fuel surcharge and the motor fuel tax. Every dealer who sells or otherwise transfers refined or motor fuel in the state shall collect the surcharge and tax required in this chapter at the time of sale, and remit the total surcharge and tax collected during each calendar month of each year to the department by the last day of each succeeding month. Every user shall likewise remit the surcharge and tax required in this chapter and accrued on fuel actually used by the user during each month. [IF THE MONTHLY RETURN IS TIMELY FILED, ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL MONTHLY SURCHARGE AND TAX DUE, LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF $100, MAY BE DEDUCTED AND RETAINED TO COVER THE EXPENSE OF ACCOUNTING AND FILING THE MONTHLY RETURN.] At the time the remittance is made, each dealer or user shall submit a statement to the department showing all fuel that the dealer or user has distributed or used during the month. […] * Sec. 6. This Act takes effect July 1, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alaska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alaska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.