Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price15.18¢/kWh2024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.605/gal2026-08 · #43 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$173.52024 · #3 of 50 · highest first
Alabama over time
Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
7 of 7 reviewed Alabama actions match · 5 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.
Alabama · 2024: 15.18¢/kWh · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Alabama, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Alabama Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Alabama · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Alabama · 202415.18¢/kWh
Alabama rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Alabama, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alabama
2024 · Alabama: 15.18¢/kWh · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alabama Residential electricity price history
Period
Alabama
Compare
2015
11.7¢/kWh
2016
11.99¢/kWh
2017
12.55¢/kWh
2018
12.18¢/kWh
2019
12.53¢/kWh
2020
12.58¢/kWh
2021
12.96¢/kWh
2022
14.25¢/kWh
2023
14.63¢/kWh
2024
15.18¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 15.18¢/kWh2024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama · your comparison
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Gulf Coast region, including taxes. The region contains Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.638/gal
Weekly change
-2.0¢
One year earlier
$2.765/gal
Change from one year earlier
+85.3¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s Gulf Coast series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Alabama. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current Alabama statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Gulf Coast regional estimate should not be read as Alabama’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Alabama community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Alabama · 2024$173.5
Alabama rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alabama
2024 · Alabama: $173.5 · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alabama Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Alabama
Compare
2010
$147.69
2011
$142.41
2012
$135.26
2013
$136.36
2014
$145.25
2015
$142.48
2016
$145.55
2017
$142.55
2018
$150.54
2019
$150.45
2020
$143.95
2021
$147.75
2022
$167.8
2023
$162.67
2024
$173.5
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · $173.52024 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama · your comparison
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Alabama · 2024142.9 TWh
Alabama rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Alabama, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alabama
2024 · Alabama: 142.9 TWh · Rank #7 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alabama Total electricity generation history
Period
Alabama
Compare
2015
152.5 TWh
2016
142.4 TWh
2017
140 TWh
2018
145.1 TWh
2019
142.7 TWh
2020
137.5 TWh
2021
142.7 TWh
2022
144.8 TWh
2023
139.4 TWh
2024
142.9 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 142.9 TWh2024 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama · your comparison
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation
45%2024
Approximate share of Alabama's in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas, the state's leading generation source in 2024.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Selected generation shares
Natural gas
45%
Nuclear
31%
Coal
About 15%
Hydroelectric
6%
Method and limitations
U.S. Energy Information Administration State Electricity Profile, Table 5, based on Forms EIA-860 and EIA-923; the displayed shares round EIA's 2024 percent shares to whole percentages.
The percentages are rounded and the selected source shares may not sum to exactly 100%.
In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Alabama because power crosses state lines.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Alabama · 2024197.7 min/year
Alabama rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alabama
2024 · Alabama: 197.7 min/year · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alabama Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Alabama
Compare
2023
400.2 min/year
2024
197.7 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 197.7 min/year2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama · your comparison
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Alabama · 2024331.6 trillion Btu
Alabama rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 331.6 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama · your comparison
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Alabama · 2024104.32 Mt CO₂
Alabama rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 104.32 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama · your comparison
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
7 of 7 reviewed Alabama actions · newest first
Mar 31, 2026 · HB 655 · Gasoline and motor fuel taxes, to suspend the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels from April 15, 2026 to June 15, 2026. · Not enactedAlabama Legislature · HB 655
Gasoline and motor fuel taxes, to suspend the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels from April 15, 2026 to June 15, 2026.
Mar 31, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Kelvin Lawrence · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would have suspended Alabama’s specified gasoline and motor-fuel excise taxes from April 15 through June 15, 2026. It did not become law; those proposed dates do not establish that a tax holiday occurred. Alabama is only one state in the Gulf Coast price series.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-03-31). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (a) For the period beginning April 15, 2026 until June 15, 2026, the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels levied pursuant to Sections 40-17-325 and 40-17-370, Code of Alabama 1975, shall be suspended. (b) The Department of Revenue may adopt rules to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2025 · SB 304 · Powering Growth Act established, Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank and the Strategic Energy Procurement Fund established under the State Industrial Development Authority to assist in obtaining equipment and providing financing for qualified energy infrastructure projects · EnactedAlabama Legislature · SB 304
Powering Growth Act established, Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank and the Strategic Energy Procurement Fund established under the State Industrial Development Authority to assist in obtaining equipment and providing financing for qualified energy infrastructure projects
May 14, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Arthur Orr · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The Powering Growth Act establishes financing and procurement mechanisms for electric infrastructure, including generation, transmission, and long-lead equipment. It can affect the range of future generating resources but does not mandate a natural-gas generation share or prove that a plant has been built.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-05-14). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Alabama in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(7) ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. Generation infrastructure, transmission infrastructure, and projects addressing long-lead items. […] §41-10-48.04 (a) There is created within the authority a division to be known as the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank. (b) In recognition of increasing concerns regarding energy capacity and the resilience of Alabama's energy infrastructure for current and future needs, the corporate purpose of the energy bank is to support the economic growth of the state by identifying and supporting energy infrastructure projects for eligible projects in Alabama. (c) The energy bank will accomplish these goals through the utilization of bond financing and other financial assistance for energy infrastructure projects. (d) The energy bank will utilize existing and future revenue sources in order to create the necessary funding streams to secure bond financing and other financial assistance that will allow the state to enhance and expand its energy infrastructure. (e) Through the energy bank, the authority may act as a state energy financing institution as that term is defined 42 U.S.C. § 16511(7)(A), or any successor statute, for purposes of obtaining federal support for Alabama energy infrastructure projects. (f) The Alabama Energy Infrastructure Fund is created in the State Treasury. All proceeds from the revenues designated to the energy fund, pursuant to this act and any other provision of law, shall be deposited into the energy fund to be expended only as provided in this act. (g) In undertaking its responsibilities under this Act, the authority may request that the Alabama Growth Alliance review and provide feedback on authority programs and activities which may include, but is not limited to, their alignment with the state's economic growth priorities. §41-10-48.05 In addition to the powers granted to it in Section 41-10-26, Sections 41-10-37 through 41-10-43, Sections 41-10-44.1 through 41-10-44.15, and Sections 41-10-47.01 through 41-10-47.09, with respect to the energy bank and the energy fund, the authority shall have the following additional powers to: (1) Make loans or provide other financial assistance to electric providers to finance or reduce the costs of eligible projects, to collect fees and charges related to such loans or other financial assistance, and to acquire, hold, pledge, and sell loan obligations at prices and in a manner as the authority determines advisable. […] §41-10-48.06 (a) In considering applications for eligible projects, the authority may request additional input from external experts as to the urgency of the energy infrastructure project, the ability of the applicant to execute the project within the stated time frame, and other assistance as determined by the authority. (b) The total aggregate amount of loans or other financial assistance provided by the bank in any year shall be limited to an amount that would not jeopardize the viability of the fund, as determined by the authority with the advice of external experts. (c) In selecting eligible projects, the authority shall consider, with assistance from external experts, project feasibility and the degree of financial risk to be assumed by the authority. (d) The authority shall ensure that no electric provider receives more than 40 percent of the loan or financial assistance funds provided by the bank in each calendar year unless a joint application of electric provider is made; provided, however, in no event (even with a joint application) shall more than 50 percent of the loan or financial assistance funds provided by the bank in each calendar year be received by any single electric provider. (e) The authority shall reserve at least 40 percent of the aggregate amount available in each calendar year for loans and other financial assistance from the energy bank for use for energy infrastructure projects in rural areas. In the event that applications are not received for energy infrastructure projects in the rural areas by the close of the second quarter of the applicable calendar year, such reservation shall no longer apply and such funds may be used for other energy infrastructure projects; provided, however, that, in failing to apply for an energy infrastructure project by the end of the second calendar quarter of a calendar year, an electric provider is not prohibited from subsequently applying and receiving an allocation of funds for energy infrastructure projects in rural areas later in that calendar year. (f) Any nonpublic or proprietary information included in an application by an economic development prospect or electric provider shall be subject to the Department of Commerce's protections for such information, provided in Section 41-29-3.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2025 · SB 313 · Alabama 21st Century Authority, use of available funds further provided for · EnactedAlabama Legislature · SB 313
Alabama 21st Century Authority, use of available funds further provided for
May 14, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law directs a $50 million transfer from the Alabama 21st Century Fund to the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank, prioritizing the Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund. This finances an infrastructure framework rather than setting the state’s measured generation mix.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-05-14). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Alabama in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c) For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) shall be transferred from the Alabama 21st Century Fund to the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank, which shall prioritize support for the Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund, and may also use the funds for any of its authorized purposes.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2025 · SB 313 · Alabama 21st Century Authority, use of available funds further provided for · SignedGovernor · SB 313
Alabama 21st Century Authority, use of available funds further provided for
May 14, 2025 · Signed
Gov. Kay Ivey · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kay Ivey signed SB 313. The law directs a $50 million transfer from the Alabama 21st Century Fund to the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank, prioritizing the Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund. This finances an infrastructure framework rather than setting the state’s measured generation mix.
The official record verifies a governor signing. Approval, legislative-entry dates, effective dates, and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Alabama in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c) For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) shall be transferred from the Alabama 21st Century Fund to the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank, which shall prioritize support for the Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund, and may also use the funds for any of its authorized purposes.
SB 304 establishes an Energy Infrastructure Bank with loan and bond-financing powers and a Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund for qualifying industrial-development energy projects and equipment, with specified rural-area funding requirements. The act creates financing authority and reporting requirements. Its loans and bonds are subject to statutory conditions; this event does not show that financing was issued, infrastructure completed, or economic output increased.
Signed on 2025-05-14. Governor approval May 14, 2025. The original act specifies June 1, 2025 for effectiveness, separately from approval and any later project decisions. The act creates financing authority and reporting requirements. Its loans and bonds are subject to statutory conditions; this event does not show that financing was issued, infrastructure completed, or economic output increased.
Why this record is included
SB 304 establishes an Energy Infrastructure Bank with loan and bond-financing powers and a Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund for qualifying industrial-development energy projects and equipment, with specified rural-area funding requirements. The act creates financing authority and reporting requirements. Its loans and bonds are subject to statutory conditions; this event does not show that financing was issued, infrastructure completed, or economic output increased. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation · energy · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
There is created within the authority, a division to be known as the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 19, 2019 · HB 149 · Rebuild Alabama act, amended to sunset the automatic indexing of the gasoline and disesel fuel tax after a specified time frame · Not enactedAlabama Legislature · HB 149
Rebuild Alabama act, amended to sunset the automatic indexing of the gasoline and disesel fuel tax after a specified time frame
Mar 19, 2019 · Not enacted
Rep. Danny Garrett · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would end the Rebuild Alabama fuel-tax indexing provision on September 1, 2039. It did not become law. A state fuel-tax provision concerns only Alabama’s contribution to the regional gasoline-price measure.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure (2019-03-19). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
"(e) The indexing provisions of subsection (d) shall terminate on September 1, 2039.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Alabama officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
18 statements from 10 candidates
2026 Alabama Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Democratic · Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries · AL
Energy & electricity
Whether it’s gasoline at the pump, or food on the scales, you and your family must be able to rely on the integrity of the merchant or suppliers selling you the product. I will vigorously investigate price gouging and will be enforce the rules to the maximum extent the law allows.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: RON HAS YOUR BACK.
Candidate campaign source
Whether it’s gasoline at the pump, or food on the scales, you and your family must be able to rely on the integrity of the merchant or suppliers selling you the product. I will vigorously investigate price gouging and will be enforce the rules to the maximum extent the law allows.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama
Candidate campaign source
Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
It's simple: no secret deals, no tax breaks to benefit the corrupt and the wealthy, and no new construction of data centers in Alabama until we have had the time to ensure our communities are protected. No more raising our electricity or water rates at a time when costs are rising every day. And no …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama
Candidate campaign source
It's simple: no secret deals, no tax breaks to benefit the corrupt and the wealthy, and no new construction of data centers in Alabama until we have had the time to ensure our communities are protected. No more raising our electricity or water rates at a time when costs are rising every day. And no more corrupt politicians using the people of Alabama as an ATM with zero accountability or transparency.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets. Fully eliminate taxes on groceries so families keep more of every paycheck.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets. Fully eliminate taxes on groceries so families keep more of every paycheck.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Republican · Public Service Commissioner, Place 1 · AL
Energy & electricity
Matt’s decision to run for the Alabama Public Service Commission comes from what he calls a God-given conviction—a deep belief that now is the time to stand up for Alabama families in a new way. The Commission regulates utilities like electricity and gas, ensuring that people across the state have a…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Conservative Leadership. A Servant’s Heart. A Proven Record.
Candidate campaign source
Matt’s decision to run for the Alabama Public Service Commission comes from what he calls a God-given conviction—a deep belief that now is the time to stand up for Alabama families in a new way. The Commission regulates utilities like electricity and gas, ensuring that people across the state have access to reliable service at fair prices. Matt believes that leadership on the Commission must reflect the needs of everyday Alabamians—not special interests.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Alabama incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 Alabama incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Danny Garrett
Alabama House of Representatives, District 44 · R–AL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Danny GarrettAlabama Legislature · HB 149
Rebuild Alabama act, amended to sunset the automatic indexing of the gasoline and disesel fuel tax after a specified time frame
Mar 19, 2019 · Not enacted
Rep. Danny Garrett · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would end the Rebuild Alabama fuel-tax indexing provision on September 1, 2039. It did not become law. A state fuel-tax provision concerns only Alabama’s contribution to the regional gasoline-price measure.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure (2019-03-19). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
"(e) The indexing provisions of subsection (d) shall terminate on September 1, 2039.
Gasoline and motor fuel taxes, to suspend the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels from April 15, 2026 to June 15, 2026.
Mar 31, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Kelvin Lawrence · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would have suspended Alabama’s specified gasoline and motor-fuel excise taxes from April 15 through June 15, 2026. It did not become law; those proposed dates do not establish that a tax holiday occurred. Alabama is only one state in the Gulf Coast price series.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-03-31). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (a) For the period beginning April 15, 2026 until June 15, 2026, the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels levied pursuant to Sections 40-17-325 and 40-17-370, Code of Alabama 1975, shall be suspended. (b) The Department of Revenue may adopt rules to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Arthur OrrAlabama Legislature · SB 304
Powering Growth Act established, Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank and the Strategic Energy Procurement Fund established under the State Industrial Development Authority to assist in obtaining equipment and providing financing for qualified energy infrastructure projects
May 14, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Arthur Orr · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The Powering Growth Act establishes financing and procurement mechanisms for electric infrastructure, including generation, transmission, and long-lead equipment. It can affect the range of future generating resources but does not mandate a natural-gas generation share or prove that a plant has been built.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-05-14). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Alabama in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(7) ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. Generation infrastructure, transmission infrastructure, and projects addressing long-lead items. […] §41-10-48.04 (a) There is created within the authority a division to be known as the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank. (b) In recognition of increasing concerns regarding energy capacity and the resilience of Alabama's energy infrastructure for current and future needs, the corporate purpose of the energy bank is to support the economic growth of the state by identifying and supporting energy infrastructure projects for eligible projects in Alabama. (c) The energy bank will accomplish these goals through the utilization of bond financing and other financial assistance for energy infrastructure projects. (d) The energy bank will utilize existing and future revenue sources in order to create the necessary funding streams to secure bond financing and other financial assistance that will allow the state to enhance and expand its energy infrastructure. (e) Through the energy bank, the authority may act as a state energy financing institution as that term is defined 42 U.S.C. § 16511(7)(A), or any successor statute, for purposes of obtaining federal support for Alabama energy infrastructure projects. (f) The Alabama Energy Infrastructure Fund is created in the State Treasury. All proceeds from the revenues designated to the energy fund, pursuant to this act and any other provision of law, shall be deposited into the energy fund to be expended only as provided in this act. (g) In undertaking its responsibilities under this Act, the authority may request that the Alabama Growth Alliance review and provide feedback on authority programs and activities which may include, but is not limited to, their alignment with the state's economic growth priorities. §41-10-48.05 In addition to the powers granted to it in Section 41-10-26, Sections 41-10-37 through 41-10-43, Sections 41-10-44.1 through 41-10-44.15, and Sections 41-10-47.01 through 41-10-47.09, with respect to the energy bank and the energy fund, the authority shall have the following additional powers to: (1) Make loans or provide other financial assistance to electric providers to finance or reduce the costs of eligible projects, to collect fees and charges related to such loans or other financial assistance, and to acquire, hold, pledge, and sell loan obligations at prices and in a manner as the authority determines advisable. […] §41-10-48.06 (a) In considering applications for eligible projects, the authority may request additional input from external experts as to the urgency of the energy infrastructure project, the ability of the applicant to execute the project within the stated time frame, and other assistance as determined by the authority. (b) The total aggregate amount of loans or other financial assistance provided by the bank in any year shall be limited to an amount that would not jeopardize the viability of the fund, as determined by the authority with the advice of external experts. (c) In selecting eligible projects, the authority shall consider, with assistance from external experts, project feasibility and the degree of financial risk to be assumed by the authority. (d) The authority shall ensure that no electric provider receives more than 40 percent of the loan or financial assistance funds provided by the bank in each calendar year unless a joint application of electric provider is made; provided, however, in no event (even with a joint application) shall more than 50 percent of the loan or financial assistance funds provided by the bank in each calendar year be received by any single electric provider. (e) The authority shall reserve at least 40 percent of the aggregate amount available in each calendar year for loans and other financial assistance from the energy bank for use for energy infrastructure projects in rural areas. In the event that applications are not received for energy infrastructure projects in the rural areas by the close of the second quarter of the applicable calendar year, such reservation shall no longer apply and such funds may be used for other energy infrastructure projects; provided, however, that, in failing to apply for an energy infrastructure project by the end of the second calendar quarter of a calendar year, an electric provider is not prohibited from subsequently applying and receiving an allocation of funds for energy infrastructure projects in rural areas later in that calendar year. (f) Any nonpublic or proprietary information included in an application by an economic development prospect or electric provider shall be subject to the Department of Commerce's protections for such information, provided in Section 41-29-3.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Rodger M. SmithermanAlabama Legislature · SB 313
Alabama 21st Century Authority, use of available funds further provided for
May 14, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law directs a $50 million transfer from the Alabama 21st Century Fund to the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank, prioritizing the Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund. This finances an infrastructure framework rather than setting the state’s measured generation mix.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-05-14). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Natural-gas share is the portion of Alabama in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(c) For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) shall be transferred from the Alabama 21st Century Fund to the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank, which shall prioritize support for the Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund, and may also use the funds for any of its authorized purposes.
Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Alabama snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Alabama, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.