Alabama · individual fact

Alabama energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price15.18¢/kWh2024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.605/gal2026-08 · #43 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$173.52024 · #3 of 50 · highest first

Alabama over time

Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 15.18¢/kWh10.7¢/kWh14.09¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhAlabama, 2015: 11.7¢/kWhAlabama, 2016: 11.99¢/kWhAlabama, 2017: 12.55¢/kWhAlabama, 2018: 12.18¢/kWhAlabama, 2019: 12.53¢/kWhAlabama, 2020: 12.58¢/kWhAlabama, 2021: 12.96¢/kWhAlabama, 2022: 14.25¢/kWhAlabama, 2023: 14.63¢/kWhAlabama, 2024: 15.18¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 50National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanNational context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementAlabama · Alabama establishes energy-infrastructure financing programs · 2025-05-14Alabama Powering Growth ActNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid reviewAlabama · DOE selects Alabama Power Company grid-upgrade application · 2026-09-24Alabama Power Company · SPARK selection● Alabama Legislature · 42● U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 32■ Alabama agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-09-30

7 of 7 reviewed Alabama actions match · 5 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.

Alabama · 2024: 15.18¢/kWh · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Alabama, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alabama Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodAlabamaRankU.S. benchmark
202415.18¢/kWh#20 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202314.63¢/kWh#23 of 50Not available
202214.25¢/kWh#18 of 50Not available
202112.96¢/kWh#22 of 50Not available
202012.58¢/kWh#22 of 50Not available
201912.53¢/kWh#22 of 50Not available
201812.18¢/kWh#26 of 50Not available
201712.55¢/kWh#23 of 50Not available
201611.99¢/kWh#25 of 50Not available
201511.7¢/kWh#26 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alabama · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

Alabama · 202415.18¢/kWh
Alabama rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Alabama, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Residential electricity price history in Alabama10.98¢/kWh14.09¢/kWh17.2¢/kWh20152024
2024 · Alabama: 15.18¢/kWh · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Residential electricity price history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
201511.7¢/kWh
201611.99¢/kWh
201712.55¢/kWh
201812.18¢/kWh
201912.53¢/kWh
202012.58¢/kWh
202112.96¢/kWh
202214.25¢/kWh
202314.63¢/kWh
202415.18¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 15.18¢/kWh2024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama · your comparison15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Gulf Coast regular gasoline price

$3.62/galWeek of August 31, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Gulf Coast region, including taxes. The region contains Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$3.638/gal
Weekly change
-2.0¢
One year earlier
$2.765/gal
Change from one year earlier
+85.3¢
Method and limitations

FactVote uses EIA’s Gulf Coast series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Alabama. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current Alabama statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Gulf Coast regional estimate should not be read as Alabama’s statewide average.
  • The regional average combines Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Alabama community.
  • Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
  • Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Alabama · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

Alabama · 2024$173.5
Alabama rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in Alabama$97.35$140.39$183.4420102024
2024 · Alabama: $173.5 · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2010$147.69
2011$142.41
2012$135.26
2013$136.36
2014$145.25
2015$142.48
2016$145.55
2017$142.55
2018$150.54
2019$150.45
2020$143.95
2021$147.75
2022$167.8
2023$162.67
2024$173.5

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · $173.52024 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama · your comparison$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

What generates Alabama electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

Alabama · 2024142.9 TWh
Alabama rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside Alabama, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Total electricity generation history in Alabama135.3 TWh145 TWh154.7 TWh20152024
2024 · Alabama: 142.9 TWh · Rank #7 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Total electricity generation history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2015152.5 TWh
2016142.4 TWh
2017140 TWh
2018145.1 TWh
2019142.7 TWh
2020137.5 TWh
2021142.7 TWh
2022144.8 TWh
2023139.4 TWh
2024142.9 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 142.9 TWh2024 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama · your comparison142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation

45%2024

Approximate share of Alabama's in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas, the state's leading generation source in 2024.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Selected generation shares

Natural gas
45%
Nuclear
31%
Coal
About 15%
Hydroelectric
6%
Method and limitations

U.S. Energy Information Administration State Electricity Profile, Table 5, based on Forms EIA-860 and EIA-923; the displayed shares round EIA's 2024 percent shares to whole percentages.

  • The percentages are rounded and the selected source shares may not sum to exactly 100%.
  • In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Alabama because power crosses state lines.
Alabama · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

Alabama · 2024197.7 min/year
Alabama rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in Alabama128 min/year430.2 min/year732.3 min/year20232024
2024 · Alabama: 197.7 min/year · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2023400.2 min/year
2024197.7 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 197.7 min/year2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama · your comparison197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

Alabama · 2024331.6 trillion Btu
Alabama rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 331.6 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama · your comparison331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

Alabama · 2024104.32 Mt CO₂
Alabama rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 104.32 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama · your comparison104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

18 statements from 10 candidates

2026 Alabama Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Ron Sparks

1 statement

Democratic · Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries · AL

Energy & electricity

Whether it’s gasoline at the pump, or food on the scales, you and your family must be able to rely on the integrity of the merchant or suppliers selling you the product. I will vigorously investigate price gouging and will be enforce the rules to the maximum extent the law allows.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: RON HAS YOUR BACK.

Candidate campaign source

Whether it’s gasoline at the pump, or food on the scales, you and your family must be able to rely on the integrity of the merchant or suppliers selling you the product. I will vigorously investigate price gouging and will be enforce the rules to the maximum extent the law allows.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ron Sparks — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Alabama Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Doug Jones

4 statements

Democratic · Governor · AL

Energy & electricity

Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
View 3 more statements from Doug Jones
Energy & electricity

Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Energy & electricity

It's simple: no secret deals, no tax breaks to benefit the corrupt and the wealthy, and no new construction of data centers in Alabama until we have had the time to ensure our communities are protected. No more raising our electricity or water rates at a time when costs are rising every day. And no …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

It's simple: no secret deals, no tax breaks to benefit the corrupt and the wealthy, and no new construction of data centers in Alabama until we have had the time to ensure our communities are protected. No more raising our electricity or water rates at a time when costs are rising every day. And no more corrupt politicians using the people of Alabama as an ATM with zero accountability or transparency.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Energy & electricity

Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets. Fully eliminate taxes on groceries so families keep more of every paycheck.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets. Fully eliminate taxes on groceries so families keep more of every paycheck.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Alabama Public Service Commissioner, Place 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Matt Gentry

1 statement

Republican · Public Service Commissioner, Place 1 · AL

Energy & electricity

Matt’s decision to run for the Alabama Public Service Commission comes from what he calls a God-given conviction—a deep belief that now is the time to stand up for Alabama families in a new way. The Commission regulates utilities like electricity and gas, ensuring that people across the state have a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Conservative Leadership. A Servant’s Heart. A Proven Record.

Candidate campaign source

Matt’s decision to run for the Alabama Public Service Commission comes from what he calls a God-given conviction—a deep belief that now is the time to stand up for Alabama families in a new way. The Commission regulates utilities like electricity and gas, ensuring that people across the state have access to reliable service at fair prices. Matt believes that leadership on the Commission must reflect the needs of everyday Alabamians—not special interests.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Gentry — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alabama incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 Alabama incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Danny Garrett

Alabama House of Representatives, District 44 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Danny Garrett
Alabama Legislature · HB 149

Rebuild Alabama act, amended to sunset the automatic indexing of the gasoline and disesel fuel tax after a specified time frame

Mar 19, 2019 · Not enacted

Rep. Danny Garrett · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would end the Rebuild Alabama fuel-tax indexing provision on September 1, 2039. It did not become law. A state fuel-tax provision concerns only Alabama’s contribution to the regional gasoline-price measure.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure (2019-03-19). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"(e) The indexing provisions of subsection (d) shall terminate on September 1, 2039.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kelvin Lawrence

Alabama House of Representatives, District 69 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kelvin Lawrence
Alabama Legislature · HB 655

Gasoline and motor fuel taxes, to suspend the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels from April 15, 2026 to June 15, 2026.

Mar 31, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Kelvin Lawrence · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would have suspended Alabama’s specified gasoline and motor-fuel excise taxes from April 15 through June 15, 2026. It did not become law; those proposed dates do not establish that a tax holiday occurred. Alabama is only one state in the Gulf Coast price series.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-03-31). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (a) For the period beginning April 15, 2026 until June 15, 2026, the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels levied pursuant to Sections 40-17-325 and 40-17-370, Code of Alabama 1975, shall be suspended. (b) The Department of Revenue may adopt rules to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Arthur Orr

Alabama Senate, District 3 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Arthur Orr
Alabama Legislature · SB 304

Powering Growth Act established, Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank and the Strategic Energy Procurement Fund established under the State Industrial Development Authority to assist in obtaining equipment and providing financing for qualified energy infrastructure projects

May 14, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Arthur Orr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The Powering Growth Act establishes financing and procurement mechanisms for electric infrastructure, including generation, transmission, and long-lead equipment. It can affect the range of future generating resources but does not mandate a natural-gas generation share or prove that a plant has been built.

Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-05-14). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of Alabama in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(7) ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. Generation infrastructure, transmission infrastructure, and projects addressing long-lead items. […] §41-10-48.04 (a) There is created within the authority a division to be known as the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank. (b) In recognition of increasing concerns regarding energy capacity and the resilience of Alabama's energy infrastructure for current and future needs, the corporate purpose of the energy bank is to support the economic growth of the state by identifying and supporting energy infrastructure projects for eligible projects in Alabama. (c) The energy bank will accomplish these goals through the utilization of bond financing and other financial assistance for energy infrastructure projects. (d) The energy bank will utilize existing and future revenue sources in order to create the necessary funding streams to secure bond financing and other financial assistance that will allow the state to enhance and expand its energy infrastructure. (e) Through the energy bank, the authority may act as a state energy financing institution as that term is defined 42 U.S.C. § 16511(7)(A), or any successor statute, for purposes of obtaining federal support for Alabama energy infrastructure projects. (f) The Alabama Energy Infrastructure Fund is created in the State Treasury. All proceeds from the revenues designated to the energy fund, pursuant to this act and any other provision of law, shall be deposited into the energy fund to be expended only as provided in this act. (g) In undertaking its responsibilities under this Act, the authority may request that the Alabama Growth Alliance review and provide feedback on authority programs and activities which may include, but is not limited to, their alignment with the state's economic growth priorities. §41-10-48.05 In addition to the powers granted to it in Section 41-10-26, Sections 41-10-37 through 41-10-43, Sections 41-10-44.1 through 41-10-44.15, and Sections 41-10-47.01 through 41-10-47.09, with respect to the energy bank and the energy fund, the authority shall have the following additional powers to: (1) Make loans or provide other financial assistance to electric providers to finance or reduce the costs of eligible projects, to collect fees and charges related to such loans or other financial assistance, and to acquire, hold, pledge, and sell loan obligations at prices and in a manner as the authority determines advisable. […] §41-10-48.06 (a) In considering applications for eligible projects, the authority may request additional input from external experts as to the urgency of the energy infrastructure project, the ability of the applicant to execute the project within the stated time frame, and other assistance as determined by the authority. (b) The total aggregate amount of loans or other financial assistance provided by the bank in any year shall be limited to an amount that would not jeopardize the viability of the fund, as determined by the authority with the advice of external experts. (c) In selecting eligible projects, the authority shall consider, with assistance from external experts, project feasibility and the degree of financial risk to be assumed by the authority. (d) The authority shall ensure that no electric provider receives more than 40 percent of the loan or financial assistance funds provided by the bank in each calendar year unless a joint application of electric provider is made; provided, however, in no event (even with a joint application) shall more than 50 percent of the loan or financial assistance funds provided by the bank in each calendar year be received by any single electric provider. (e) The authority shall reserve at least 40 percent of the aggregate amount available in each calendar year for loans and other financial assistance from the energy bank for use for energy infrastructure projects in rural areas. In the event that applications are not received for energy infrastructure projects in the rural areas by the close of the second quarter of the applicable calendar year, such reservation shall no longer apply and such funds may be used for other energy infrastructure projects; provided, however, that, in failing to apply for an energy infrastructure project by the end of the second calendar quarter of a calendar year, an electric provider is not prohibited from subsequently applying and receiving an allocation of funds for energy infrastructure projects in rural areas later in that calendar year. (f) Any nonpublic or proprietary information included in an application by an economic development prospect or electric provider shall be subject to the Department of Commerce's protections for such information, provided in Section 41-29-3.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman

Alabama Senate, District 18 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman
Alabama Legislature · SB 313

Alabama 21st Century Authority, use of available funds further provided for

May 14, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Rodger M. Smitherman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law directs a $50 million transfer from the Alabama 21st Century Fund to the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank, prioritizing the Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund. This finances an infrastructure framework rather than setting the state’s measured generation mix.

Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-05-14). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of Alabama in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(c) For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) shall be transferred from the Alabama 21st Century Fund to the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank, which shall prioritize support for the Strategic Energy Infrastructure Development Fund, and may also use the funds for any of its authorized purposes.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.