Compare Alabama’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.
BLS does not publish a statewide Alabama CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.
All-items price level88.82024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.42024 · #26 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level61.82024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Alabama over time
Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
All-items price level Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
5 of 5 reviewed Alabama actions match · 5 date markers shown. 28 major events shown separately.
Alabama · 2024: 88.8 · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Alabama with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Alabama · state comparison
How does Alabama’s cost of living compare?
The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.
Alabama · 202488.8
Alabama rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
All-items price level
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.
Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Alabama with the published U.S. category value shown.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alabama
2024 · Alabama: 88.8 · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alabama All-items price level history
Period
Alabama
Compare
2014
90.2
2015
89.7
2016
90.6
2017
90.1
2018
87.4
2019
88.3
2020
87.6
2021
88.1
2022
88
2023
89.1
2024
88.8
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 88.82024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
110.7
—
#2
Hawaii
110
—
#3
New Jersey
108.8
—
#4
New York
107.9
—
#5
Washington
107
—
#6
Massachusetts
105.8
—
#7
Maryland
105
—
#8
New Hampshire
104.2
—
#9
Connecticut
103.6
—
#10
Florida
103.4
—
#11
Oregon
103.4
—
#12
Colorado
103.1
—
#13
Alaska
102.4
—
#14
Rhode Island
102.3
—
#15
Virginia
101.1
—
#16
Arizona
100.7
—
#17
Nevada
100
—
#18
Illinois
100
—
#19
Delaware
99.8
—
#20
Utah
98.9
—
#21
Minnesota
98.6
—
#22
Vermont
98
—
#23
Pennsylvania
97.6
—
#24
Texas
97.1
—
#25
Maine
97.1
—
#26
Georgia
96.3
—
#27
Michigan
96.2
—
#28
Idaho
95.5
—
#29
Montana
94.6
—
#30
North Carolina
94.3
—
#31
Wisconsin
94.1
—
#32
South Carolina
93.7
—
#33
Indiana
93.3
—
#34
Ohio
92.8
—
#35
Wyoming
92.7
—
#36
New Mexico
92.2
—
#37
Tennessee
91.9
—
#38
Missouri
90.8
—
#39
Kentucky
90.2
—
#40
Nebraska
90.1
—
#41
Kansas
90.1
—
#42
West Virginia
89.5
—
#43
North Dakota
89
—
#44
Alabama · your comparison
88.8
—
#45
South Dakota
88.6
—
#46
Louisiana
88.2
—
#47
Oklahoma
87.8
—
#48
Iowa
87.8
—
#49
Mississippi
87
—
#50
Arkansas
86.9
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
Alabama · 20242.3%
Alabama rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual change in regional price deflator
Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.
An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alabama
2024 · Alabama: 2.3% · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alabama Annual change in regional price deflator history
Period
Alabama
Compare
2015
-0.3%
2016
2%
2017
1.1%
2018
-1%
2019
2.5%
2020
0.3%
2021
4.7%
2022
6.5%
2023
5.1%
2024
2.3%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · 2.3%2024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Montana
6.7%
—
#2
Idaho
6.2%
—
#3
Utah
6%
—
#4
Nevada
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Mexico
4%
—
#7
Indiana
4%
—
#8
Wyoming
3.9%
—
#9
Illinois
3.9%
—
#10
Colorado
3.8%
—
#11
Delaware
3.7%
—
#12
Ohio
3.6%
—
#13
Wisconsin
3.6%
—
#14
North Dakota
3.5%
—
#15
Vermont
3.5%
—
#16
South Dakota
3.1%
—
#17
Maryland
3%
—
#18
Minnesota
3%
—
#19
Kentucky
2.9%
—
#20
South Carolina
2.9%
—
#21
Hawaii
2.9%
—
#22
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#23
Mississippi
2.8%
—
#24
Kansas
2.8%
—
#25
Pennsylvania
2.8%
—
#26
Arkansas
2.8%
—
#27
New York
2.7%
—
#28
Arizona
2.6%
—
#29
North Carolina
2.5%
—
#30
Texas
2.5%
—
#31
New Jersey
2.5%
—
#32
West Virginia
2.5%
—
#33
Nebraska
2.4%
—
#34
Georgia
2.4%
—
#35
Florida
2.4%
—
#36
Virginia
2.4%
—
#37
Tennessee
2.4%
—
#38
Alabama · your comparison
2.3%
—
#39
Missouri
2.3%
—
#40
Louisiana
2%
—
#41
Connecticut
2%
—
#42
Alaska
1.7%
—
#43
Maine
1.7%
—
#44
Oklahoma
1.6%
—
#45
Iowa
1.5%
—
#46
New Hampshire
1.4%
—
#47
Washington
1.3%
—
#48
California
1.3%
—
#49
Oregon
1.2%
—
#50
Massachusetts
0.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.
Alabama · 2024$52,216
Alabama rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.
Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Alabama
2024 · Alabama: $52,216 · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Alabama Real personal income per person history
Period
Alabama
Compare
2014
$41,984
2015
$43,809
2016
$43,554
2017
$44,481
2018
$46,440
2019
$47,130
2020
$50,186
2021
$52,875
2022
$50,649
2023
$50,902
2024
$52,216
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Alabama · $52,2162024 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Wyoming
$75,501
—
#2
Connecticut
$74,254
—
#3
Massachusetts
$71,629
—
#4
South Dakota
$69,153
—
#5
Nebraska
$65,297
—
#6
North Dakota
$65,271
—
#7
Colorado
$65,223
—
#8
New Hampshire
$64,632
—
#9
Washington
$64,421
—
#10
New York
$64,153
—
#11
New Jersey
$63,142
—
#12
California
$63,028
—
#13
Minnesota
$62,039
—
#14
Virginia
$61,914
—
#15
Maryland
$61,111
—
#16
Illinois
$60,333
—
#17
Alaska
$60,272
—
#18
Iowa
$60,144
—
#19
Montana
$59,203
—
#20
Kansas
$59,172
—
#21
Vermont
$58,893
—
#22
Oklahoma
$58,692
—
#23
Pennsylvania
$58,620
—
#24
Tennessee
$58,582
—
#25
Wisconsin
$58,273
—
#26
Texas
$58,219
—
#27
Missouri
$57,850
—
#28
Maine
$57,480
—
#29
Florida
$57,131
—
#30
Louisiana
$56,789
—
#31
Nevada
$56,503
—
#32
North Carolina
$56,310
—
#33
Ohio
$56,232
—
#34
Rhode Island
$55,878
—
#35
Indiana
$55,562
—
#36
Oregon
$55,451
—
#37
Arkansas
$55,219
—
#38
Delaware
$55,185
—
#39
Utah
$55,116
—
#40
Michigan
$53,569
—
#41
Georgia
$52,952
—
#42
Arizona
$52,890
—
#43
Idaho
$52,816
—
#44
South Carolina
$52,463
—
#45
Kentucky
$52,290
—
#46
Hawaii
$52,272
—
#47
Alabama · your comparison
$52,216
—
#48
New Mexico
$51,121
—
#49
West Virginia
$50,051
—
#50
Mississippi
$48,465
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
5 of 5 reviewed Alabama actions · newest first
Apr 16, 2026 · HB527 · HB 527 — Overtime deduction and temporary food-tax suspension · Signed by governorGovernor · HB527
HB 527 — Overtime deduction and temporary food-tax suspension
Apr 16, 2026 · Signed by governor
Kay Ivey · Signed
Reviewed topic context
HB 527 establishes a deduction of up to $1,000 per taxpayer for qualified overtime compensation for tax years 2026–28 and suspends the state portion of specified food sales and use taxes for May–June 2026. The deduction reduces taxable income, rather than providing a $1,000 payment. The temporary suspension concerns the state portion of the specified taxes; this source does not measure savings received or retail price changes.
Signed on 2026-04-16. Governor approval April 16, 2026. The overtime provision specifies October 1, 2026 for effectiveness and tax years 2026–28; the food-tax suspension specifies May 1–June 30, 2026. The deduction reduces taxable income, rather than providing a $1,000 payment. The temporary suspension concerns the state portion of the specified taxes; this source does not measure savings received or retail price changes.
Why this record is included
HB 527 establishes a deduction of up to $1,000 per taxpayer for qualified overtime compensation for tax years 2026–28 and suspends the state portion of specified food sales and use taxes for May–June 2026. The deduction reduces taxable income, rather than providing a $1,000 payment. The temporary suspension concerns the state portion of the specified taxes; this source does not measure savings received or retail price changes. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Alabama evidence context: income-taxes · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, for the period beginning May 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026, the state portion of the sales and use taxes on food levied pursuant to Sections 40-23-2(6) and 40-23-61(d), Code of Alabama 1975, shall be suspended.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 31, 2026 · HB 655 · Gasoline and motor fuel taxes, to suspend the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels from April 15, 2026 to June 15, 2026. · Not enactedAlabama Legislature · HB 655
Gasoline and motor fuel taxes, to suspend the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels from April 15, 2026 to June 15, 2026.
Mar 31, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Kelvin Lawrence · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would have suspended Alabama’s specified gasoline and motor-fuel excise taxes from April 15 through June 15, 2026. It did not become law; those proposed dates do not establish that a tax holiday occurred. Alabama is only one state in the Gulf Coast price series.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-03-31). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (a) For the period beginning April 15, 2026 until June 15, 2026, the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels levied pursuant to Sections 40-17-325 and 40-17-370, Code of Alabama 1975, shall be suspended. (b) The Department of Revenue may adopt rules to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 2, 2025 · SB 199 · State employees; paid parental leave authorized, parameters for eligibility established · EnactedAlabama Legislature · SB 199
State employees; paid parental leave authorized, parameters for eligibility established
Apr 2, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Vivian Davis Figures · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law provides eligible public employees with paid parental leave: eight weeks for eligible female employees after birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage and two weeks for eligible male employees, plus specified adoption leave. Leave is paid at 100 percent of base pay and is subject to employment and return-to-work requirements.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-04-02). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§36-6A-2 (a)(1) An eligible employee who is female shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage of her child which occurs on or after July 1, 2025. (2) An eligible employee who is male shall be entitled to two weeks of parental leave in connection with the birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage of his child which occurs on or after July 1, 2025. (3) An eligible employee shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the placement of a child with the eligible employee for adoption which occurs on or after July 1, 2025, provided the child is three years of age or younger at the time that he or she is placed with the eligible employee. In the event that parents who jointly adopt a child are both eligible employees, one parent shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the adoption and one parent shall be entitled to two weeks of parental leave in connection with the adoption. The State of Alabama Personnel Department, the State Board of Education, and the Alabama Community College System shall jointly adopt rules to implement this subdivision. (b) An eligible employee may not take parental leave under this section unless he or she has completed the requirements of subdivision (b)(1) and paragraph(b)(2)a. prior to taking parental leave. (1) The eligible employee shall provide the applicable employing agency a written plan regarding his or her intended use of the parental leave and any other leave he or she intends to take in connection with the qualifying event. (2)a. The eligible employee shall agree in writing with the applicable employing agency not to separate from employment for a period of at least eight weeks following the conclusion of any leave taken in connection with the qualifying event. b. The requirement of paragraph a. may be waived by the applicable employing agency in circumstances where the eligible employee is unable to return to work such as a serious health condition of the employee or of an immediate family member. c. If the eligible employee fails to comply with the return-to-work agreement required by this subdivision, the applicable employing agency may recover from the eligible employee, by offset or otherwise, an amount equal to the eligible employee’s hourly rate of pay multiplied by the number of hours the eligible employee failed to work in compliance with the return-to-work agreement. (3) In the event of an emergency that prevents an eligible employee from completing the requirements of subdivision (b)(1) and paragraph(b)(2)a. prior to taking parental leave, the eligible employee shall complete these requirements as soon as practicable after the emergency has ended. (c) An eligible employee may use any parental leave to which he or she is entitled under this chapter intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule, subject to the following limitations: (1) The parental leave shall be used within 365 days of the qualifying event or within 365 days of the eligible employee taking parental leave for a qualifying event, whichever occurs sooner. An eligible employee may only use parental leave in connection with one qualifying event during a 365-day period, even if more than one qualifying event occurs. (2) The eligible employee shall maintain a continuing parental role with any child whose birth or adoption was a qualifying event. (3) Parental leave taken intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule for bonding purposes shall be agreed to by the applicable employing agency prior to the start of the leave. (d) Parental leave taken under this section shall run concurrently with leave taken under Section 25-1-61 and under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, codified as 29 U.S.C. § 2611, et seq. (e) Upon the expiration of an eligible employee's parental leave, the eligible employee shall be restored to the position that he or she held at the time of the qualifying event or to an equivalent position with equivalent seniority, status, employment benefits, pay, and other terms and conditions of employment, including any fringe benefits and service credits, that the eligible employee received or was entitled to prior to the commencement of his or her parental leave. A local education agency employee, as provided in Section 36-6A-1(3)b., shall be restored to the grade taught prior to taking parental leave unless otherwise agreed to by the employee. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent an eligible employee from receiving any cost-of-living salary increase provided generally to eligible employees or any merit increase to which the eligible employee would have been entitled had he or she not taken parental leave." “§36-6A-3 (a) Parental leave authorized by this chapter shall be administered as follows: (1) Parental leave shall be paid at 100 percent of the eligible employee's base pay. (2) Parental leave shall remain at 100 percent of the pay provided in subdivision (1) for the duration of the leave as if the eligible employee worked continuously from the date that the eligible employee commenced his or her parental leave until the date the eligible employee returns from parental leave. (3) Parental leave shall not require an eligible employee to use or exhaust sick leave, annual leave, or any other leave or paid time off. (4) Parental leave has no cash value. (b) Any unused parental leave may not be used to calculate an eligible employee's retirement benefits. (c) Unused parental leave shall not roll over, be reserved for use during a subsequent qualifying event, or be paid to the eligible employee."
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 19, 2019 · HB 149 · Rebuild Alabama act, amended to sunset the automatic indexing of the gasoline and disesel fuel tax after a specified time frame · Not enactedAlabama Legislature · HB 149
Rebuild Alabama act, amended to sunset the automatic indexing of the gasoline and disesel fuel tax after a specified time frame
Mar 19, 2019 · Not enacted
Rep. Danny Garrett · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would end the Rebuild Alabama fuel-tax indexing provision on September 1, 2039. It did not become law. A state fuel-tax provision concerns only Alabama’s contribution to the regional gasoline-price measure.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure (2019-03-19). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
"(e) The indexing provisions of subsection (d) shall terminate on September 1, 2039.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 12, 2019 · HB 2 · Motor vehicles and motor fuels, rebuild Alabama act, additional tax on gasoline and diesel fuel of ten cents in increments, additional licensing tax on electric and hybrid electric automobiles, distribution of proceeds · SignedGovernor · HB 2
Motor vehicles and motor fuels, rebuild Alabama act, additional tax on gasoline and diesel fuel of ten cents in increments, additional licensing tax on electric and hybrid electric automobiles, distribution of proceeds
Mar 12, 2019 · Signed
Gov. Kay Ivey · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kay Ivey signed HB 2. The Rebuild Alabama Act phases in an additional gasoline and diesel excise tax totaling 10 cents per gallon by October 2021 and provides later indexing. Taxes are a component of pump prices; this does not establish their effect on the six-state Gulf Coast average.
The official record verifies a governor signing. Approval, legislative-entry dates, effective dates, and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 6. (a) Effective for tax periods beginning after August 31, 2019, an additional excise tax of six cents ($0.06) is imposed on each net gallon of gasoline and diesel fuel. (b) Effective October 1, 2020, this additional excise tax is increased by two cents ($.02) to eight cents ($0.08) on each net gallon of gasoline and diesel fuel. (c) Effective October 1, 2021, this additional excise tax is increased by two cents ($.02) to ten cents ($0.10) on each net gallon of gasoline and diesel fuel. (d) Beginning October 1, 2023, and on July 1 of every other year thereafter, the excise tax rate provided in this section shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the yearly average of the National Highway Construction Cost Index (NHCCI) issued by the U. S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for the most recent 12-month period ending December 31, compared to the base year average, which is the average for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2020 and rounded to the nearest whole cent. The maximum amount of increase or decrease in the excise tax rate shall not exceed $.01 per net gallon of gasoline or diesel fuel and shall take effect every other year. The Department of Revenue shall notify each terminal supplier, position holder, licensed distributor, and importer of the tax rate adjustment applicable under this paragraph on or before March 1. (e) This additional excise tax shall be levied, administered, and collected in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 of Chapter 17 of Title 40 of the Code of Alabama 1975, provided that the due date for payment and filing of returns for all motor fuel taxes, including the additional amounts levied in this act, shall be the 20th day of the month following the month in which the tax accrues, except as otherwise provided in Section 40-17-340 (d), and the bond required under Section 40-17-335 (a)(1) shall not exceed three million dollars ($3,000,000). The net tax proceeds, after the cost of collection and distribution to the Alabama Highway Finance Corporation authorized by this act shall be distributed to the state and to each county and municipality for transportation infrastructure purposes in accordance with the provisions this act.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Alabama officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
17 statements from 8 candidates
2026 Alabama Governor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements
Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama
Candidate campaign source
Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets. Fully eliminate taxes on groceries so families keep more of every paycheck.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets. Fully eliminate taxes on groceries so families keep more of every paycheck.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
At Macedonia Church in Daphne, we see the food line get longer every month. That's happening right here in our community, in a place we wouldn't associate with food insecurity. The cost of living the every day Americans has gotten out of control.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Issues
Candidate campaign source
At Macedonia Church in Daphne, we see the food line get longer every month. That's happening right here in our community, in a place we wouldn't associate with food insecurity. The cost of living the every day Americans has gotten out of control.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
This economy isn’t working for all of us. Too many Republican policies protect the ultra-wealthy and they drive up the cost of living for struggling families. Nearly half of American workers don’t earn a living wage, while the ultra-rich don’t pay their fair share of taxes. This must stop. We will l…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: OUR ECONOMY MUST WORK FOR EVERYONE
Candidate campaign source
This economy isn’t working for all of us. Too many Republican policies protect the ultra-wealthy and they drive up the cost of living for struggling families. Nearly half of American workers don’t earn a living wage, while the ultra-rich don’t pay their fair share of taxes. This must stop. We will level the field for working families, and make life affordable for all of us.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Alabama incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Alabama incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Danny Garrett
Alabama House of Representatives, District 44 · R–AL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Danny GarrettAlabama Legislature · HB 149
Rebuild Alabama act, amended to sunset the automatic indexing of the gasoline and disesel fuel tax after a specified time frame
Mar 19, 2019 · Not enacted
Rep. Danny Garrett · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would end the Rebuild Alabama fuel-tax indexing provision on September 1, 2039. It did not become law. A state fuel-tax provision concerns only Alabama’s contribution to the regional gasoline-price measure.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure (2019-03-19). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
"(e) The indexing provisions of subsection (d) shall terminate on September 1, 2039.
Gasoline and motor fuel taxes, to suspend the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels from April 15, 2026 to June 15, 2026.
Mar 31, 2026 · Not enacted
Rep. Kelvin Lawrence · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The proposal would have suspended Alabama’s specified gasoline and motor-fuel excise taxes from April 15 through June 15, 2026. It did not become law; those proposed dates do not establish that a tax holiday occurred. Alabama is only one state in the Gulf Coast price series.
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-03-31). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.
Why this record is included
The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (a) For the period beginning April 15, 2026 until June 15, 2026, the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels levied pursuant to Sections 40-17-325 and 40-17-370, Code of Alabama 1975, shall be suspended. (b) The Department of Revenue may adopt rules to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Vivian Davis FiguresAlabama Legislature · SB 199
State employees; paid parental leave authorized, parameters for eligibility established
Apr 2, 2025 · Enacted
Sen. Vivian Davis Figures · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The law provides eligible public employees with paid parental leave: eight weeks for eligible female employees after birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage and two weeks for eligible male employees, plus specified adoption leave. Leave is paid at 100 percent of base pay and is subject to employment and return-to-work requirements.
Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-04-02). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Alabama evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§36-6A-2 (a)(1) An eligible employee who is female shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage of her child which occurs on or after July 1, 2025. (2) An eligible employee who is male shall be entitled to two weeks of parental leave in connection with the birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage of his child which occurs on or after July 1, 2025. (3) An eligible employee shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the placement of a child with the eligible employee for adoption which occurs on or after July 1, 2025, provided the child is three years of age or younger at the time that he or she is placed with the eligible employee. In the event that parents who jointly adopt a child are both eligible employees, one parent shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the adoption and one parent shall be entitled to two weeks of parental leave in connection with the adoption. The State of Alabama Personnel Department, the State Board of Education, and the Alabama Community College System shall jointly adopt rules to implement this subdivision. (b) An eligible employee may not take parental leave under this section unless he or she has completed the requirements of subdivision (b)(1) and paragraph(b)(2)a. prior to taking parental leave. (1) The eligible employee shall provide the applicable employing agency a written plan regarding his or her intended use of the parental leave and any other leave he or she intends to take in connection with the qualifying event. (2)a. The eligible employee shall agree in writing with the applicable employing agency not to separate from employment for a period of at least eight weeks following the conclusion of any leave taken in connection with the qualifying event. b. The requirement of paragraph a. may be waived by the applicable employing agency in circumstances where the eligible employee is unable to return to work such as a serious health condition of the employee or of an immediate family member. c. If the eligible employee fails to comply with the return-to-work agreement required by this subdivision, the applicable employing agency may recover from the eligible employee, by offset or otherwise, an amount equal to the eligible employee’s hourly rate of pay multiplied by the number of hours the eligible employee failed to work in compliance with the return-to-work agreement. (3) In the event of an emergency that prevents an eligible employee from completing the requirements of subdivision (b)(1) and paragraph(b)(2)a. prior to taking parental leave, the eligible employee shall complete these requirements as soon as practicable after the emergency has ended. (c) An eligible employee may use any parental leave to which he or she is entitled under this chapter intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule, subject to the following limitations: (1) The parental leave shall be used within 365 days of the qualifying event or within 365 days of the eligible employee taking parental leave for a qualifying event, whichever occurs sooner. An eligible employee may only use parental leave in connection with one qualifying event during a 365-day period, even if more than one qualifying event occurs. (2) The eligible employee shall maintain a continuing parental role with any child whose birth or adoption was a qualifying event. (3) Parental leave taken intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule for bonding purposes shall be agreed to by the applicable employing agency prior to the start of the leave. (d) Parental leave taken under this section shall run concurrently with leave taken under Section 25-1-61 and under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, codified as 29 U.S.C. § 2611, et seq. (e) Upon the expiration of an eligible employee's parental leave, the eligible employee shall be restored to the position that he or she held at the time of the qualifying event or to an equivalent position with equivalent seniority, status, employment benefits, pay, and other terms and conditions of employment, including any fringe benefits and service credits, that the eligible employee received or was entitled to prior to the commencement of his or her parental leave. A local education agency employee, as provided in Section 36-6A-1(3)b., shall be restored to the grade taught prior to taking parental leave unless otherwise agreed to by the employee. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent an eligible employee from receiving any cost-of-living salary increase provided generally to eligible employees or any merit increase to which the eligible employee would have been entitled had he or she not taken parental leave." “§36-6A-3 (a) Parental leave authorized by this chapter shall be administered as follows: (1) Parental leave shall be paid at 100 percent of the eligible employee's base pay. (2) Parental leave shall remain at 100 percent of the pay provided in subdivision (1) for the duration of the leave as if the eligible employee worked continuously from the date that the eligible employee commenced his or her parental leave until the date the eligible employee returns from parental leave. (3) Parental leave shall not require an eligible employee to use or exhaust sick leave, annual leave, or any other leave or paid time off. (4) Parental leave has no cash value. (b) Any unused parental leave may not be used to calculate an eligible employee's retirement benefits. (c) Unused parental leave shall not roll over, be reserved for use during a subsequent qualifying event, or be paid to the eligible employee."
Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Alabama snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Alabama, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.