Alabama · individual fact

Alabama prices and inflation

Compare Alabama’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Alabama CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level88.82024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.42024 · #26 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level61.82024 · #47 of 50 · highest first

Alabama over time

Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 88.885.993.7101.5Alabama, 2014: 90.2Alabama, 2015: 89.7Alabama, 2016: 90.6Alabama, 2017: 90.1Alabama, 2018: 87.4Alabama, 2019: 88.3Alabama, 2020: 87.6Alabama, 2021: 88.1Alabama, 2022: 88Alabama, 2023: 89.1Alabama, 2024: 88.8201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 28National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockAlabama · Alabama approves overtime and temporary grocery-tax provisions · 2026-04-16Alabama tax provisions● Alabama Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 2■ Alabama agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-04-30

5 of 5 reviewed Alabama actions match · 5 date markers shown. 28 major events shown separately.

Alabama · 2024: 88.8 · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Alabama with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alabama All-items price level · source units
PeriodAlabamaRankU.S. benchmark
202488.8#44 of 50100
202389.1#43 of 50100
202288#47 of 50100
202188.1#49 of 50100
202087.6#48 of 50100
201988.3#48 of 50100
201887.4#48 of 50100
201790.1#42 of 50100
201690.6#45 of 50100
201589.7#46 of 50100
201490.2#46 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alabama · state comparison

How does Alabama’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Alabama · 202488.8
Alabama rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Alabama with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
All-items price level history in Alabama85.593.7101.920142024
2024 · Alabama: 88.8 · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama All-items price level history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
201490.2
201589.7
201690.6
201790.1
201887.4
201988.3
202087.6
202188.1
202288
202389.1
202488.8

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 88.82024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama · your comparison88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Alabama · 20242.3%
Alabama rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Alabama-2.1%2.8%7.7%20152024
2024 · Alabama: 2.3% · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2015-0.3%
20162%
20171.1%
2018-1%
20192.5%
20200.3%
20214.7%
20226.5%
20235.1%
20242.3%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 2.3%2024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama · your comparison2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Alabama · 2024$52,216
Alabama rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Real personal income per person history in Alabama$39.38K$50.67K$61.97K20142024
2024 · Alabama: $52,216 · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Real personal income per person history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2014$41,984
2015$43,809
2016$43,554
2017$44,481
2018$46,440
2019$47,130
2020$50,186
2021$52,875
2022$50,649
2023$50,902
2024$52,216

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · $52,2162024 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama · your comparison$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

17 statements from 8 candidates

2026 Alabama Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Doug Jones

4 statements

Democratic · Governor · AL

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
View 3 more statements from Doug Jones
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets. Fully eliminate taxes on groceries so families keep more of every paycheck.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Deliver immediate cost relief Suspend the state gas tax when gas prices spike, delivering a fast, common-sense way to put money back in people’s pockets. Fully eliminate taxes on groceries so families keep more of every paycheck.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Stronger accountability where utility costs are decided

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Stronger accountability where utility costs are decided

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗

2026 Alabama U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · AL

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

At Macedonia Church in Daphne, we see the food line get longer every month. That's happening right here in our community, in a place we wouldn't associate with food insecurity. The cost of living the every day Americans has gotten out of control.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

At Macedonia Church in Daphne, we see the food line get longer every month. That's happening right here in our community, in a place we wouldn't associate with food insecurity. The cost of living the every day Americans has gotten out of control.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Clyde W. Jones, Jr. campaign source 2 ↗

2026 Alabama U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Lee McInnis

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · AL

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

This economy isn’t working for all of us. Too many Republican policies protect the ultra-wealthy and they drive up the cost of living for struggling families. Nearly half of American workers don’t earn a living wage, while the ultra-rich don’t pay their fair share of taxes. This must stop. We will l…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: OUR ECONOMY MUST WORK FOR EVERYONE

Candidate campaign source

This economy isn’t working for all of us. Too many Republican policies protect the ultra-wealthy and they drive up the cost of living for struggling families. Nearly half of American workers don’t earn a living wage, while the ultra-rich don’t pay their fair share of taxes. This must stop. We will level the field for working families, and make life affordable for all of us.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Lee McInnis — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alabama incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Alabama incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Danny Garrett

Alabama House of Representatives, District 44 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Danny Garrett
Alabama Legislature · HB 149

Rebuild Alabama act, amended to sunset the automatic indexing of the gasoline and disesel fuel tax after a specified time frame

Mar 19, 2019 · Not enacted

Rep. Danny Garrett · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would end the Rebuild Alabama fuel-tax indexing provision on September 1, 2039. It did not become law. A state fuel-tax provision concerns only Alabama’s contribution to the regional gasoline-price measure.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Transportation, Utilities and Infrastructure (2019-03-19). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"(e) The indexing provisions of subsection (d) shall terminate on September 1, 2039.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kelvin Lawrence

Alabama House of Representatives, District 69 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kelvin Lawrence
Alabama Legislature · HB 655

Gasoline and motor fuel taxes, to suspend the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels from April 15, 2026 to June 15, 2026.

Mar 31, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Kelvin Lawrence · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would have suspended Alabama’s specified gasoline and motor-fuel excise taxes from April 15 through June 15, 2026. It did not become law; those proposed dates do not establish that a tax holiday occurred. Alabama is only one state in the Gulf Coast price series.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-03-31). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Gulf Coast regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas. Alabama policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Alabama statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (a) For the period beginning April 15, 2026 until June 15, 2026, the state excise taxes on gasoline and motor fuels levied pursuant to Sections 40-17-325 and 40-17-370, Code of Alabama 1975, shall be suspended. (b) The Department of Revenue may adopt rules to implement this section. Section 2. This act shall become effective immediately.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Vivian Davis Figures

Alabama Senate, District 33 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Vivian Davis Figures
Alabama Legislature · SB 199

State employees; paid parental leave authorized, parameters for eligibility established

Apr 2, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Vivian Davis Figures · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The law provides eligible public employees with paid parental leave: eight weeks for eligible female employees after birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage and two weeks for eligible male employees, plus specified adoption leave. Leave is paid at 100 percent of base pay and is subject to employment and return-to-work requirements.

Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-04-02). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

§36-6A-2 (a)(1) An eligible employee who is female shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage of her child which occurs on or after July 1, 2025. (2) An eligible employee who is male shall be entitled to two weeks of parental leave in connection with the birth, stillbirth, or miscarriage of his child which occurs on or after July 1, 2025. (3) An eligible employee shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the placement of a child with the eligible employee for adoption which occurs on or after July 1, 2025, provided the child is three years of age or younger at the time that he or she is placed with the eligible employee. In the event that parents who jointly adopt a child are both eligible employees, one parent shall be entitled to eight weeks of parental leave in connection with the adoption and one parent shall be entitled to two weeks of parental leave in connection with the adoption. The State of Alabama Personnel Department, the State Board of Education, and the Alabama Community College System shall jointly adopt rules to implement this subdivision. (b) An eligible employee may not take parental leave under this section unless he or she has completed the requirements of subdivision (b)(1) and paragraph(b)(2)a. prior to taking parental leave. (1) The eligible employee shall provide the applicable employing agency a written plan regarding his or her intended use of the parental leave and any other leave he or she intends to take in connection with the qualifying event. (2)a. The eligible employee shall agree in writing with the applicable employing agency not to separate from employment for a period of at least eight weeks following the conclusion of any leave taken in connection with the qualifying event. b. The requirement of paragraph a. may be waived by the applicable employing agency in circumstances where the eligible employee is unable to return to work such as a serious health condition of the employee or of an immediate family member. c. If the eligible employee fails to comply with the return-to-work agreement required by this subdivision, the applicable employing agency may recover from the eligible employee, by offset or otherwise, an amount equal to the eligible employee’s hourly rate of pay multiplied by the number of hours the eligible employee failed to work in compliance with the return-to-work agreement. (3) In the event of an emergency that prevents an eligible employee from completing the requirements of subdivision (b)(1) and paragraph(b)(2)a. prior to taking parental leave, the eligible employee shall complete these requirements as soon as practicable after the emergency has ended. (c) An eligible employee may use any parental leave to which he or she is entitled under this chapter intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule, subject to the following limitations: (1) The parental leave shall be used within 365 days of the qualifying event or within 365 days of the eligible employee taking parental leave for a qualifying event, whichever occurs sooner. An eligible employee may only use parental leave in connection with one qualifying event during a 365-day period, even if more than one qualifying event occurs. (2) The eligible employee shall maintain a continuing parental role with any child whose birth or adoption was a qualifying event. (3) Parental leave taken intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule for bonding purposes shall be agreed to by the applicable employing agency prior to the start of the leave. (d) Parental leave taken under this section shall run concurrently with leave taken under Section 25-1-61 and under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, codified as 29 U.S.C. § 2611, et seq. (e) Upon the expiration of an eligible employee's parental leave, the eligible employee shall be restored to the position that he or she held at the time of the qualifying event or to an equivalent position with equivalent seniority, status, employment benefits, pay, and other terms and conditions of employment, including any fringe benefits and service credits, that the eligible employee received or was entitled to prior to the commencement of his or her parental leave. A local education agency employee, as provided in Section 36-6A-1(3)b., shall be restored to the grade taught prior to taking parental leave unless otherwise agreed to by the employee. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent an eligible employee from receiving any cost-of-living salary increase provided generally to eligible employees or any merit increase to which the eligible employee would have been entitled had he or she not taken parental leave." “§36-6A-3 (a) Parental leave authorized by this chapter shall be administered as follows: (1) Parental leave shall be paid at 100 percent of the eligible employee's base pay. (2) Parental leave shall remain at 100 percent of the pay provided in subdivision (1) for the duration of the leave as if the eligible employee worked continuously from the date that the eligible employee commenced his or her parental leave until the date the eligible employee returns from parental leave. (3) Parental leave shall not require an eligible employee to use or exhaust sick leave, annual leave, or any other leave or paid time off. (4) Parental leave has no cash value. (b) Any unused parental leave may not be used to calculate an eligible employee's retirement benefits. (c) Unused parental leave shall not roll over, be reserved for use during a subsequent qualifying event, or be paid to the eligible employee."
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.