Compare Wisconsin’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.
BLS does not publish a statewide Wisconsin CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.
All-items price level94.12024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level94.32024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level79.32024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Wisconsin over time
Explore Wisconsin readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Wisconsin officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Wisconsin effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Wisconsin change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
All-items price level Wisconsin · source units
WisconsinPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
28 of 28 reviewed Wisconsin actions match · 12 date markers shown. 28 major events shown separately.
Wisconsin · 2024: 94.1 · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Wisconsin with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Wisconsin · state comparison
How does Wisconsin’s cost of living compare?
The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.
Wisconsin · 202494.1
Wisconsin rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
All-items price level
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.
Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Wisconsin with the published U.S. category value shown.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Wisconsin
2024 · Wisconsin: 94.1 · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Wisconsin All-items price level history
Period
Wisconsin
Compare
2014
93.8
2015
93.3
2016
93.2
2017
93.5
2018
94
2019
94.5
2020
92.7
2021
93.3
2022
92.4
2023
93.2
2024
94.1
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Wisconsin stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Wisconsin has a dark outline.
Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Wisconsin · 94.12024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Wisconsin with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
110.7
—
#2
Hawaii
110
—
#3
New Jersey
108.8
—
#4
New York
107.9
—
#5
Washington
107
—
#6
Massachusetts
105.8
—
#7
Maryland
105
—
#8
New Hampshire
104.2
—
#9
Connecticut
103.6
—
#10
Florida
103.4
—
#11
Oregon
103.4
—
#12
Colorado
103.1
—
#13
Alaska
102.4
—
#14
Rhode Island
102.3
—
#15
Virginia
101.1
—
#16
Arizona
100.7
—
#17
Nevada
100
—
#18
Illinois
100
—
#19
Delaware
99.8
—
#20
Utah
98.9
—
#21
Minnesota
98.6
—
#22
Vermont
98
—
#23
Pennsylvania
97.6
—
#24
Texas
97.1
—
#25
Maine
97.1
—
#26
Georgia
96.3
—
#27
Michigan
96.2
—
#28
Idaho
95.5
—
#29
Montana
94.6
—
#30
North Carolina
94.3
—
#31
Wisconsin · your comparison
94.1
—
#32
South Carolina
93.7
—
#33
Indiana
93.3
—
#34
Ohio
92.8
—
#35
Wyoming
92.7
—
#36
New Mexico
92.2
—
#37
Tennessee
91.9
—
#38
Missouri
90.8
—
#39
Kentucky
90.2
—
#40
Nebraska
90.1
—
#41
Kansas
90.1
—
#42
West Virginia
89.5
—
#43
North Dakota
89
—
#44
Alabama
88.8
—
#45
South Dakota
88.6
—
#46
Louisiana
88.2
—
#47
Oklahoma
87.8
—
#48
Iowa
87.8
—
#49
Mississippi
87
—
#50
Arkansas
86.9
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
Wisconsin · 20243.6%
Wisconsin rank#13among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual change in regional price deflator
Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.
An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Wisconsin
2024 · Wisconsin: 3.6% · Rank #13 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Wisconsin Annual change in regional price deflator history
Period
Wisconsin
Compare
2015
-0.4%
2016
0.9%
2017
2.1%
2018
2.6%
2019
1.9%
2020
-0.8%
2021
4.8%
2022
5.5%
2023
4.7%
2024
3.6%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Wisconsin stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Wisconsin has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Wisconsin · 3.6%2024 · Rank #13 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Wisconsin with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Montana
6.7%
—
#2
Idaho
6.2%
—
#3
Utah
6%
—
#4
Nevada
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Mexico
4%
—
#7
Indiana
4%
—
#8
Wyoming
3.9%
—
#9
Illinois
3.9%
—
#10
Colorado
3.8%
—
#11
Delaware
3.7%
—
#12
Ohio
3.6%
—
#13
Wisconsin · your comparison
3.6%
—
#14
North Dakota
3.5%
—
#15
Vermont
3.5%
—
#16
South Dakota
3.1%
—
#17
Maryland
3%
—
#18
Minnesota
3%
—
#19
Kentucky
2.9%
—
#20
South Carolina
2.9%
—
#21
Hawaii
2.9%
—
#22
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#23
Mississippi
2.8%
—
#24
Kansas
2.8%
—
#25
Pennsylvania
2.8%
—
#26
Arkansas
2.8%
—
#27
New York
2.7%
—
#28
Arizona
2.6%
—
#29
North Carolina
2.5%
—
#30
Texas
2.5%
—
#31
New Jersey
2.5%
—
#32
West Virginia
2.5%
—
#33
Nebraska
2.4%
—
#34
Georgia
2.4%
—
#35
Florida
2.4%
—
#36
Virginia
2.4%
—
#37
Tennessee
2.4%
—
#38
Alabama
2.3%
—
#39
Missouri
2.3%
—
#40
Louisiana
2%
—
#41
Connecticut
2%
—
#42
Alaska
1.7%
—
#43
Maine
1.7%
—
#44
Oklahoma
1.6%
—
#45
Iowa
1.5%
—
#46
New Hampshire
1.4%
—
#47
Washington
1.3%
—
#48
California
1.3%
—
#49
Oregon
1.2%
—
#50
Massachusetts
0.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.
Wisconsin · 2024$58,273
Wisconsin rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.
Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Wisconsin
2024 · Wisconsin: $58,273 · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Wisconsin Real personal income per person history
Period
Wisconsin
Compare
2014
$48,532
2015
$50,684
2016
$50,991
2017
$51,773
2018
$52,759
2019
$53,652
2020
$57,378
2021
$59,816
2022
$57,706
2023
$57,791
2024
$58,273
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Wisconsin stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Wisconsin has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Wisconsin · $58,2732024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Wisconsin with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Wyoming
$75,501
—
#2
Connecticut
$74,254
—
#3
Massachusetts
$71,629
—
#4
South Dakota
$69,153
—
#5
Nebraska
$65,297
—
#6
North Dakota
$65,271
—
#7
Colorado
$65,223
—
#8
New Hampshire
$64,632
—
#9
Washington
$64,421
—
#10
New York
$64,153
—
#11
New Jersey
$63,142
—
#12
California
$63,028
—
#13
Minnesota
$62,039
—
#14
Virginia
$61,914
—
#15
Maryland
$61,111
—
#16
Illinois
$60,333
—
#17
Alaska
$60,272
—
#18
Iowa
$60,144
—
#19
Montana
$59,203
—
#20
Kansas
$59,172
—
#21
Vermont
$58,893
—
#22
Oklahoma
$58,692
—
#23
Pennsylvania
$58,620
—
#24
Tennessee
$58,582
—
#25
Wisconsin · your comparison
$58,273
—
#26
Texas
$58,219
—
#27
Missouri
$57,850
—
#28
Maine
$57,480
—
#29
Florida
$57,131
—
#30
Louisiana
$56,789
—
#31
Nevada
$56,503
—
#32
North Carolina
$56,310
—
#33
Ohio
$56,232
—
#34
Rhode Island
$55,878
—
#35
Indiana
$55,562
—
#36
Oregon
$55,451
—
#37
Arkansas
$55,219
—
#38
Delaware
$55,185
—
#39
Utah
$55,116
—
#40
Michigan
$53,569
—
#41
Georgia
$52,952
—
#42
Arizona
$52,890
—
#43
Idaho
$52,816
—
#44
South Carolina
$52,463
—
#45
Kentucky
$52,290
—
#46
Hawaii
$52,272
—
#47
Alabama
$52,216
—
#48
New Mexico
$51,121
—
#49
West Virginia
$50,051
—
#50
Mississippi
$48,465
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
28 of 28 reviewed Wisconsin actions · newest first
Aug 7, 2026 · Executive Order 303 · Executive Order 303 — Relating to Declaring a Period of Abnormal Economic Disruption and Prohibiting Price Gouging · Directive issuedGovernor · Executive Order 303
Executive Order 303 — Relating to Declaring a Period of Abnormal Economic Disruption and Prohibiting Price Gouging
Aug 7, 2026 · Directive issued
Tony Evers · Issued
Reviewed topic context
Executive Order 303 addressed price gouging in Outagamie, Winnebago, Forest and Vilas counties following severe weather. The instrument specified four counties and a 45-day duration. It does not establish statewide price changes or continuing legal effect.
Issued on 2026-08-07. Signed attestation date August 7, 2026, reconciled with the official archive. The instrument specified four counties and a 45-day duration. It does not establish statewide price changes or continuing legal effect.
Why this record is included
Executive Order 303 addressed price gouging in Outagamie, Winnebago, Forest and Vilas counties following severe weather. The instrument specified four counties and a 45-day duration. It does not establish statewide price changes or continuing legal effect. This topic relationship does not establish an effect on a state statistic.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: cpi · reviewed policy-topic context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Executive Order 303
Relating to Declaring a Period of Abnormal Economic Disruption and Prohibiting Price Gouging
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 8, 2026 · DOJ 2026-07-08 · Joined an amicus brief challenging reductions in the wage standard for H-2A agricultural workers and addressing effects on domestic farmworkers’ wages. · Reported actionWisconsin agencies · DOJ 2026-07-08
Joined an amicus brief challenging reductions in the wage standard for H-2A agricultural workers and addressing effects on domestic farmworkers’ wages.
Jul 8, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Josh Kaul · Filed amicus brief
FactVote reviewed summary
Joined an amicus brief challenging reductions in the wage standard for H-2A agricultural workers and addressing effects on domestic farmworkers’ wages.
Reported in the original official document dated 2026-07-08. Filed amicus brief. The reporting date may follow the filing or court order. A filing, comment, or guidance does not enact law or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born · Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(608) 266-1220 NEWS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 8, 2026 Wisconsin DOJ Joins Amicus Brief in United Farm Workers v. United States Department of Labor to Protect Wages for Domestic and H-2A Farmworkers MADISON, Wis. – The Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) is joining a coalition in filing an amicus brief supporting the United Farm Workers’ (UFW) motion for summary judgment seeking to permanently enjoin the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) from applying its 2025 interim final rule (IFR) that implements a significant reduction to the Adverse Effect Wage Rate ( AEWR). The AEWR is a longstanding regulatory tool used to protect the wages and working conditions of domestic farmworkers from the effects of employers hiring foreign labor. Through the IFR, the DOL seeks to transfer an estimated $2.46 billion annually from H-2A farmworkers to industry employers by lowering worker pay standards, without calculating the impact on domestic farmworkers . The rule abandons reliable farm - specific data, arbitrarily creates new lower -paying job categories, and deducts housing costs from the wages paid to H -2A workers. These changes harm the public interest and exacerbate the roots of farmworker poverty for b oth H-2A workers and domestic farmworkers ali ke, because when employers can pay H -2A workers less, they pay domestic workers less too. “Farmworkers do essential work, and they deserve to be paid fairly,” said AG Kaul. “This interim final rule, which drives down wages for farmworkers, should be blocked.” The H -2A program allows certain agricultural employers to bring in foreign temporary workers when there are insufficient domestic workers to fulfill necessary Page 2 of 2 DOJ Communications Office [email protected] (608) 266-1220 jobs. H-2A employers are responsib
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 23, 2026 · SB 605 · housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE) · Did not passWisconsin Legislature · SB 605
housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE)
Mar 23, 2026 · Did not pass
Sen. Jeff Smith · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored SB605: housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: Housing, homelessness, and indigence Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to…
2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Wisconsin’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Housing, homelessness, and indigence Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to counties, municipalities, community action agencies, and private organizations for the purpose of providing housing and associated supportive services to homeless individuals and families in order to facilitate the movement of homeless persons to independent living. This bill provides an additional $5,000,000 in the 2025-27 fiscal biennium to fund that grant program. Emergency rental assistance grants The bill creates an emergency rental assistance program under which DOA awards grants to provide tenant-based rental assistance to individuals and families who have suffered an economic hardship and whose annual household income does not exceed 80 percent of the median household income for the county in which the individual or family resides. The bill appropriates $10,000,000 for the program in the 2025-27 fiscal biennium. Grants to defray housing costs The bill increases funding for DOA to award grants to persons or families of low or moderate income to defray housing costs. The bill provides an additional $220,000 in each fiscal year of the 2025-27 fiscal biennium for that purpose. Duties of the Interagency Council on Homelessness The bill requires the Interagency Council on Homelessness to do all of the following every two years: 1. Identify ways in which DOA and other state agencies specified in the bill and the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority can increase access to services for homeless individuals and families, including homeless children and youths as defined under federal law. 2. Advise each of the state agencies specified in the bill and WHEDA to revise any policy or
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 23, 2026 · AB 607 · housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE) · Did not passWisconsin Legislature · AB 607
housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE)
Mar 23, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Ann Roe · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB607: housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: Housing, homelessness, and indigence Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to…
2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Wisconsin’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Housing, homelessness, and indigence Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to counties, municipalities, community action agencies, and private organizations for the purpose of providing housing and associated supportive services to homeless individuals and families in order to facilitate the movement of homeless persons to independent living. This bill provides an additional $5,000,000 in the 2025-27 fiscal biennium to fund that grant program. Emergency rental assistance grants The bill creates an emergency rental assistance program under which DOA awards grants to provide tenant-based rental assistance to individuals and families who have suffered an economic hardship and whose annual household income does not exceed 80 percent of the median household income for the county in which the individual or family resides. The bill appropriates $10,000,000 for the program in the 2025-27 fiscal biennium. Grants to defray housing costs The bill increases funding for DOA to award grants to persons or families of low or moderate income to defray housing costs. The bill provides an additional $220,000 in each fiscal year of the 2025-27 fiscal biennium for that purpose. Duties of the Interagency Council on Homelessness The bill requires the Interagency Council on Homelessness to do all of the following every two years: 1. Identify ways in which DOA and other state agencies specified in the bill and the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority can increase access to services for homeless individuals and families, including homeless children and youths as defined under federal law. 2. Advise each of the state agencies specified in the bill and WHEDA to revise any policy or
Sponsored AB532: unemployment insurance benefits. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: EMPLOYMENT This bill makes changes regarding the amount of unemployment insurance benefits that a claimant may receive in a given week, as follows: Increasing maximum weekly unemployment benefits Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance receives a weekly benefit rate equal to a percentage of that person’s past earnings, but the weekly benefit rate is capped at $370. This bill changes the maximum weekly benefit rate in the following ways: 1. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate…
2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
EMPLOYMENT This bill makes changes regarding the amount of unemployment insurance benefits that a claimant may receive in a given week, as follows: Increasing maximum weekly unemployment benefits Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance receives a weekly benefit rate equal to a percentage of that person’s past earnings, but the weekly benefit rate is capped at $370. This bill changes the maximum weekly benefit rate in the following ways: 1. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate is capped at $497. 2. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate is increased based upon the change in the consumer price index and is then increased on the same basis annually thereafter. Increasing unemployment insurance benefit wage cap Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance is ineligible to receive any UI benefits for a week if the person receives or will receive wages or certain other earnings totalling more than $500 (wage cap). This bill changes the wage cap in the following ways: 1. For weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the wage cap is increased to $672. 2. For weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 3, 2027, the wage cap is increased based upon the change in the consumer price index and is then increased on the same basis annually thereafter.
Sponsored SB515: unemployment insurance benefits. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: EMPLOYMENT This bill makes changes regarding the amount of unemployment insurance benefits that a claimant may receive in a given week, as follows: Increasing maximum weekly unemployment benefits Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance receives a weekly benefit rate equal to a percentage of that person’s past earnings, but the weekly benefit rate is capped at $370. This bill changes the maximum weekly benefit rate in the following ways: 1. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate…
2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
EMPLOYMENT This bill makes changes regarding the amount of unemployment insurance benefits that a claimant may receive in a given week, as follows: Increasing maximum weekly unemployment benefits Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance receives a weekly benefit rate equal to a percentage of that person’s past earnings, but the weekly benefit rate is capped at $370. This bill changes the maximum weekly benefit rate in the following ways: 1. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate is capped at $497. 2. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate is increased based upon the change in the consumer price index and is then increased on the same basis annually thereafter. Increasing unemployment insurance benefit wage cap Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance is ineligible to receive any UI benefits for a week if the person receives or will receive wages or certain other earnings totalling more than $500 (wage cap). This bill changes the wage cap in the following ways: 1. For weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the wage cap is increased to $672. 2. For weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 3, 2027, the wage cap is increased based upon the change in the consumer price index and is then increased on the same basis annually thereafter.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Wisconsin officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Wisconsin candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
10 statements from 6 candidates
2026 Wisconsin Governor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Steil has always worked to protect our seniors and the programs they rely on. Steil is committed to protecting Social Security and Medicare. He supports policies to ensure these programs are solvent for generations to come. He’s also working to lower prescription drug prices which have become unaffo…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement
Candidate campaign source
Steil has always worked to protect our seniors and the programs they rely on. Steil is committed to protecting Social Security and Medicare. He supports policies to ensure these programs are solvent for generations to come. He’s also working to lower prescription drug prices which have become unaffordable for many seniors.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The War Powers Act was written by a Congressman from Milwaukee, Clement Zablocki, and I began my VA career at the hospital named after him. Congress needs to uphold its Constitutional duty to decide when we declare war instead of deferring to the executive branch. We should end the costly, reckless …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans
Candidate campaign source
The War Powers Act was written by a Congressman from Milwaukee, Clement Zablocki, and I began my VA career at the hospital named after him. Congress needs to uphold its Constitutional duty to decide when we declare war instead of deferring to the executive branch. We should end the costly, reckless war in Iran and bring down the costs of war and high prices that Wisconsin families are shouldering.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
As families struggle to pay their grocery bills, rent, gas, etc., Democrats continue to steepen and multiply taxes. We need less government spending. I, Tim Rogers, want to let taxpayers keep more of their money. You’ve earned it, and I want you to keep it. The government has not earned the right to…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
As families struggle to pay their grocery bills, rent, gas, etc., Democrats continue to steepen and multiply taxes. We need less government spending. I, Tim Rogers, want to let taxpayers keep more of their money. You’ve earned it, and I want you to keep it. The government has not earned the right to spend so much of your hard-earned money. The current status quo promotes spending outside the limits of the Constitution. It is unconstitutional to spend money on public schools. If elected, I will work to destroy the progressive tax system. Interstate Commerce enforcement should not be conducted inside of state boundaries, only when commerce actually moves between states. We need to let government agencies and programs decrease in size via attrition with retirements.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Wisconsin candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Wisconsin incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Wisconsin legislators and Wisconsin’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Wisconsin’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
22 matching sponsorships or proposals · 13 Wisconsin incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Ann Roe
Wisconsin State Assembly, District 44 · D–WI
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Ann RoeWisconsin Legislature · AB 607
housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE)
Mar 23, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Ann Roe · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB607: housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: Housing, homelessness, and indigence Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to…
2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Wisconsin’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Housing, homelessness, and indigence Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to counties, municipalities, community action agencies, and private organizations for the purpose of providing housing and associated supportive services to homeless individuals and families in order to facilitate the movement of homeless persons to independent living. This bill provides an additional $5,000,000 in the 2025-27 fiscal biennium to fund that grant program. Emergency rental assistance grants The bill creates an emergency rental assistance program under which DOA awards grants to provide tenant-based rental assistance to individuals and families who have suffered an economic hardship and whose annual household income does not exceed 80 percent of the median household income for the county in which the individual or family resides. The bill appropriates $10,000,000 for the program in the 2025-27 fiscal biennium. Grants to defray housing costs The bill increases funding for DOA to award grants to persons or families of low or moderate income to defray housing costs. The bill provides an additional $220,000 in each fiscal year of the 2025-27 fiscal biennium for that purpose. Duties of the Interagency Council on Homelessness The bill requires the Interagency Council on Homelessness to do all of the following every two years: 1. Identify ways in which DOA and other state agencies specified in the bill and the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority can increase access to services for homeless individuals and families, including homeless children and youths as defined under federal law. 2. Advise each of the state agencies specified in the bill and WHEDA to revise any policy or
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Christine SinickiWisconsin Legislature · AB 1169
a state minimum wage, allowing the enactment of local minimum wage ordinances, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Mar 23, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Christine Sinicki · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB1169: a state minimum wage, allowing the enactment of local minimum wage ordinances, and granting rule-making authority. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: Currently, the state minimum wage law requires that employers pay the applicable minimum wage set in statute to their employees. Under that law, the current minimum wage for most employees is $7.25 per hour. This bill raises the minimum wage for most employees to $15 per hour three months after the effective date of the bill. Beginning one year after the bill’s effective date, the Department of Workforce Development is required to annually revise the minimum wage established under the bill by determining the percentage…
2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Currently, the state minimum wage law requires that employers pay the applicable minimum wage set in statute to their employees. Under that law, the current minimum wage for most employees is $7.25 per hour. This bill raises the minimum wage for most employees to $15 per hour three months after the effective date of the bill. Beginning one year after the bill’s effective date, the Department of Workforce Development is required to annually revise the minimum wage established under the bill by determining the percentage difference between the consumer price index for the preceding year and the consumer price index for the year before the preceding year, adjusting the minimum wage then in effect by that percentage difference, and rounding that result to the nearest multiple of five cents. However, DWD is not required to revise the general minimum wage if the consumer price index for the preceding year has not increased over the consumer price index for the year before the preceding year. DWD is required to publish the revised minimum wage in the Wisconsin Administrative Register and on DWD’s website. The bill also repeals 1) provisions establishing a separate, lower minimum wage for tipped employees; 2) a provision requiring DWD to promulgate rules governing the counting of tips or similar gratuities toward payment of the minimum wage; 3) provisions setting specific meal and lodging allowances; and 4) provisions establishing minimum wages for minor employees, opportunity employees, agricultural employees, and others. The bill requires DWD to establish by rule the minimum wage for those employees. Finally, current law prohibits a city, village, town, or county from enacting and administering an ordinance establishing a minimum wage. The bill eliminates that prohibition.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Dave MaxeyWisconsin Legislature · AB 988
eliminating minimum markup requirements and the prohibition on sales below cost
Apr 15, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Dave Maxey · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
AB 988 would repeal Wisconsin’s Unfair Sales Act, eliminating minimum-markup requirements and its prohibition on below-cost sales, including motor vehicle fuel. It failed to pass on April 15, 2024.
2024-04-15: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. This proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
The proposed repeal directly concerns gasoline pricing rules. It did not become law. Existing rules use statutory cost calculations and exceptions, rather than guaranteeing a fixed profit on every sale; neither the proposal nor the current rule establishes an effect on EIA’s 15-state Midwest average.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This bill repeals the Unfair Sales Act, also known as the “minimum markup” law. This state's Unfair Sales Act 1) prohibits below-cost sales of any merchandise, if the sale is intended to induce the purchase of other merchandise or divert trade unfairly from a competitor; and 2) requires a “minimum markup” (a specified amount over the cost of the merchandise to the seller) to be added to sales of motor vehicle fuel, tobacco products, fermented malt beverages, liquor, or wine. For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
5 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Lisa SubeckWisconsin Legislature · AB 600
housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE)
Apr 15, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Lisa Subeck · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB600: housing and homelessness; emergency rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: Housing, homelessness, and indigence 1. Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants…
2024-04-15: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Wisconsin’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Housing, homelessness, and indigence 1. Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to counties, municipalities, community action agencies, and private organizations for the purpose of providing housing and associated supportive services to homeless individuals and families in order to facilitate the movement of homeless persons to independent living. This bill provides an additional $5,000,000 in the 2023-25 fiscal biennium to fund that grant program. 2. Emergency rental assistance grants The bill creates an emergency rental assistance program under which DOA awards grants to provide tenant-based rental assistance to individuals and families who have suffered an economic hardship and whose annual household income does not exceed 80 percent of the median household income for the county in which the individual or family resides. The bill appropriates $10,000,000 for the program in the 2023-25 fiscal biennium. 3. Grants to defray housing costs The bill increases funding for DOA to award grants to persons or families of low or moderate income to defray housing costs. The bill provides an additional $220,000 in each fiscal year of the 2023-25 fiscal biennium for that purpose. 4. Duties of the Interagency Council on Homelessness The bill requires the Interagency Council on Homelessness to do all of the following every two years: 1. Identify ways in which DOA and other state agencies specified in the bill and the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority can increase access to services for homeless individuals and families, including homeless children and youths as defined under federal law. 2. Advise each of the state agencies specified in the bill and WHEDA to revise a
a state minimum wage, allowing the enactment of local minimum wage ordinances, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Apr 15, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Lisa Subeck · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB1146: a state minimum wage, allowing the enactment of local minimum wage ordinances, and granting rule-making authority. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: Currently, the state minimum wage law requires that employers pay the applicable minimum wage set in statute to their employees. Under that law, the current minimum wage for most employees is $7.25 per hour. This bill raises the minimum wage for most employees to $10.85 per hour on the effective date of the bill and $15 per hour one year after the effective date of the bill. Beginning two years after the bill's effective date, the bill requires the Department of Workforce Development to annually revise the minimum wage…
2024-04-15: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Currently, the state minimum wage law requires that employers pay the applicable minimum wage set in statute to their employees. Under that law, the current minimum wage for most employees is $7.25 per hour. This bill raises the minimum wage for most employees to $10.85 per hour on the effective date of the bill and $15 per hour one year after the effective date of the bill. Beginning two years after the bill's effective date, the bill requires the Department of Workforce Development to annually revise the minimum wage established under the bill by determining the percentage difference between the consumer price index for the preceding year and the consumer price index for the year before the preceding year, adjusting the minimum wage then in effect by that percentage difference, and rounding that result to the nearest multiple of five cents. DWD, however, is not required to revise the general minimum wage if the consumer price index for the preceding year has not increased over the consumer price index for the year before the preceding year. DWD is required to publish the revised minimum wage in the Wisconsin Administrative Register and on DWD's website. The bill also repeals 1) provisions establishing a separate, lower minimum wage for tipped employees; 2) a provision that requires DWD to promulgate rules governing the counting of tips or similar gratuities toward payment of the minimum wage; 3) provisions setting specific meal and lodging allowances; and 4) provisions establishing minimum wages for minor employees, opportunity employees, agricultural employees, and others and instead requires DWD to establish the minimum wage for those employees by rule. Finally, current law prohibits a city, village, town, or county from enacting and administering an ordinance estab
housing and homelessness; rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE)
Apr 19, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Lisa Subeck · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB1145: housing and homelessness; rental assistance program; indigent civil legal services; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; economic security; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; lead exposure and abatement services; lead service line replacement; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: Housing, homelessness, and indigence 1. Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to…
2022-04-19: Fiscal estimate received. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Wisconsin’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Housing, homelessness, and indigence 1. Grants to facilitate the independent living of homeless persons Under current law, the Department of Administration provides housing grants to counties, municipalities, community action agencies, and private organizations for the purpose of providing housing and associated supportive services to homeless individuals and families in order to facilitate the movement of homeless persons to independent living. This bill provides an additional $5,000,000 in the 2021-23 fiscal biennium to fund that grant program. 2. Rental assistance grants The bill creates a rental assistance program under which DOA awards grants to provide tenant-based rental assistance to individuals and families who have suffered an economic hardship and whose annual household income does not exceed 80 percent of the median household income for the county in which the individual or family resides. The bill appropriates $10,000,000 for the program in the 2021-23 fiscal biennium. 3. Grants to defray housing costs The bill increases funding for DOA to award grants to persons or families of low or moderate income to defray housing costs. The bill provides an additional $220,000 in each fiscal year of the 2021-23 fiscal biennium for that purpose. 4. Duties of the Interagency Council on Homelessness The bill requires the Interagency Council on Homelessness to do all of the following every two years: 1. Identify ways in which DOA and other state agencies specified in the bill and the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority can increase access to services for homeless individuals and families, including homeless children and youths as defined under federal law. 2. Advise each of the state agencies specified in the bill and WHEDA to revise any policy or practice
a state minimum wage, allowing the enactment of local minimum wage ordinances, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Mar 15, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Lisa Subeck · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB477: a state minimum wage, allowing the enactment of local minimum wage ordinances, and granting rule-making authority. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: Currently, the state minimum wage law requires that employers pay the applicable minimum wage set in statute to their employees. Under that law, the current minimum wage for most employees is $7.25 per hour. This bill raises the minimum wage for most employees to $10.15 per hour on the effective date of the bill and $15 per hour one year after the effective date of the bill. Beginning two years after the bill's effective date, the bill requires the Department of Workforce Development to annually revise the minimum wage…
2022-03-15: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Currently, the state minimum wage law requires that employers pay the applicable minimum wage set in statute to their employees. Under that law, the current minimum wage for most employees is $7.25 per hour. This bill raises the minimum wage for most employees to $10.15 per hour on the effective date of the bill and $15 per hour one year after the effective date of the bill. Beginning two years after the bill's effective date, the bill requires the Department of Workforce Development to annually revise the minimum wage established under the bill by determining the percentage difference between the consumer price index for the preceding year and the consumer price index for the year before the preceding year, adjusting the minimum wage then in effect by that percentage difference, and rounding that result to the nearest multiple of five cents. DWD, however, is not required to revise the general minimum wage if the consumer price index for the preceding year has not increased over the consumer price index for the year before the preceding year. DWD is required to publish the revised minimum wage in the Wisconsin Administrative Register and on DWD's Internet site. The bill also repeals 1) provisions establishing a separate, lower minimum wage for tipped employees; 2) a provision that requires DWD to promulgate rules governing the counting of tips or similar gratuities toward payment of the minimum wage; 3) provisions setting specific meal and lodging allowances; and 4) provisions establishing minimum wages for minor employees, opportunity employees, agricultural employees, and others and instead requires DWD to establish the minimum wage for those employees by rule. Finally, current law prohibits a city, village, town, or county from enacting and administering an ordinance
housing and homelessness; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; public assistance advisory committee; economic security; adverse childhood experiences reports; creating a nonrefundable individual income tax credit for household and dependent care services; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; and making an appropriation. (FE)
Apr 1, 2020 · Did not pass
Rep. Lisa Subeck · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB508: housing and homelessness; workforce development; community action agencies; poverty reports; mental health; public assistance advisory committee; economic security; adverse childhood experiences reports; creating a nonrefundable individual income tax credit for household and dependent care services; reimbursement for nonemergency medical transportation services; urban mass transit aid; and making an appropriation. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: or moderate income to defray housing costs. The bill provides an additional $220,000 in each fiscal year of the 2019-21 fiscal biennium for that purpose. This bill requires the Interagency Council on Homelessness to do all of the…
2020-04-01: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Wisconsin’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
or moderate income to defray housing costs. The bill provides an additional $220,000 in each fiscal year of the 2019-21 fiscal biennium for that purpose. This bill requires the Interagency Council on Homelessness to do all of the following every two years: 1. Review all of the state's housing and homelessness-related programs. 2. Identify ways in which DOA and other state agencies specified in the bill and the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority can increase access to services for homeless individuals and families, including homeless children and youths as defined under federal law. 3. Advise each of the state agencies specified in the bill and WHEDA to revise any policy or practice that the council determines impedes homeless individuals and families from obtaining services. This bill requires WHEDA to issue up to $1,000,000 in bonds to make grants directly to individuals and families or to one or more local housing authorities for the purpose of providing rent assistance to individuals and families who are in danger of being evicted. This bill requires the Department of Public Instruction to annually issue a report to the legislature on the number of homeless children and youths in the public schools of this state. Under the bill, “homeless children and youths” is defined by reference to federal law providing homeless assistance. This bill requires WHEDA to annually issue a report to the legislature on the number of households with worst case housing needs in this state. “Households with worst case housing needs” is defined in a manner consistent with that used by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. The report must include data and demographic information on these households, analysis of the impediments to obtaining affordable hou
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Maureen McCarvilleWisconsin Legislature · AB 532
unemployment insurance benefits. (FE)
Mar 23, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Maureen McCarville · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sponsored AB532: unemployment insurance benefits. (FE) Introduced proposal analysis: EMPLOYMENT This bill makes changes regarding the amount of unemployment insurance benefits that a claimant may receive in a given week, as follows: Increasing maximum weekly unemployment benefits Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance receives a weekly benefit rate equal to a percentage of that person’s past earnings, but the weekly benefit rate is capped at $370. This bill changes the maximum weekly benefit rate in the following ways: 1. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate…
2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
EMPLOYMENT This bill makes changes regarding the amount of unemployment insurance benefits that a claimant may receive in a given week, as follows: Increasing maximum weekly unemployment benefits Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance receives a weekly benefit rate equal to a percentage of that person’s past earnings, but the weekly benefit rate is capped at $370. This bill changes the maximum weekly benefit rate in the following ways: 1. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate is capped at $497. 2. For benefits paid for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 3, 2027, the maximum weekly benefit rate is increased based upon the change in the consumer price index and is then increased on the same basis annually thereafter. Increasing unemployment insurance benefit wage cap Under current law, a person who qualifies for unemployment insurance is ineligible to receive any UI benefits for a week if the person receives or will receive wages or certain other earnings totalling more than $500 (wage cap). This bill changes the wage cap in the following ways: 1. For weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 4, 2026, but before January 3, 2027, the wage cap is increased to $672. 2. For weeks of unemployment beginning on or after January 3, 2027, the wage cap is increased based upon the change in the consumer price index and is then increased on the same basis annually thereafter.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Rick GundrumWisconsin Legislature · AB 200
applying the motor vehicle fuel tax supplier’s administrative allowance to diesel fuel, a motor vehicle fuel tax refund for evaporation losses, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Mar 23, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Rick Gundrum · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The introduced bill would let gasoline and diesel retailers claim a refund of 0.5% of state fuel tax paid to compensate for shrinkage or evaporation. The gasoline refund is the connection to this regional gasoline-price fact; a separate diesel-supplier allowance is outside that component. This describes the introduced proposal; its recorded legislative disposition is separate.
2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1. The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
The introduced bill would let gasoline and diesel retailers claim a refund of 0.5% of state fuel tax paid to compensate for shrinkage or evaporation. The gasoline refund is the connection to this regional gasoline-price fact; a separate diesel-supplier allowance is outside that component. The displayed price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regional proxy. Wisconsin gasoline taxes, supply, or sales rules concern one component and do not set pump prices across the region. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Wisconsin evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Administrative allowance of the motor vehicle fuel tax Current law allows a motor vehicle fuel supplier to retain as an administrative allowance 1.35 percent of the motor vehicle fuel tax the supplier collects on the first sale of gasoline in this state. This bill allows a motor vehicle fuel supplier to retain the same administrative allowance for the motor vehicle fuel tax the supplier collects on the first sale of diesel fuel in this state. Retailer refund for motor vehicle fuel evaporation The bill allows a retailer who sells gasoline, diesel fuel, or both (motor vehicle fuel) in this state to claim a refund equal to 0.5 percent of the state motor vehicle fuel tax paid on the retailer’s purchase of the motor vehicle fuel to compensate for motor vehicle fuel stored on site that is lost by shrinkage or evaporation. A claim for a refund under the bill must be made to the Department of Revenue no later than 12 months after the date on which the retailer purchased the motor vehicle fuel and must be accompanied with invoices prepared by the motor vehicle fuel supplier or a list of purchases prepared by the retailer. Prior to 2019, the state provided such refunds to compensate gasoline retailers for shrinkage and evaporation losses.
Only current Wisconsin officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Wisconsin statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Wisconsin snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Wisconsin, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.