Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.
Median owner-occupied home value$162.6K2020–2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$8722020–2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate74.9%2020–2024 · #1 of 50 · highest first
West Virginia over time
Explore West Virginia readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. West Virginia officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a West Virginia effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a West Virginia change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Home-price growth since 2016 West Virginia · source units
West VirginiaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
27 of 27 reviewed West Virginia actions match · 25 date markers shown. 58 major events shown separately.
West Virginia · 2025: +58.6% · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
West Virginia Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
West Virginia · state comparison
Home values, rent, and homeownership
Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.
West Virginia · 2020–2024$162,600
West Virginia rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Median owner-occupied home value
Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.
2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · $162,6002020–2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$839,100
—
#2
California
$734,700
—
#3
Washington
$564,600
—
#4
Massachusetts
$562,100
—
#5
Colorado
$539,400
—
#6
Utah
$489,400
—
#7
Oregon
$477,600
—
#8
New Jersey
$454,400
—
#9
Nevada
$435,400
—
#10
New York
$423,800
—
#11
Maryland
$419,900
—
#12
Idaho
$418,600
—
#13
Rhode Island
$404,200
—
#14
New Hampshire
$402,500
—
#15
Arizona
$394,500
—
#16
Virginia
$383,700
—
#17
Montana
$375,800
—
#18
Connecticut
$366,900
—
#19
Florida
$359,000
—
#20
Alaska
$352,900
—
#21
Delaware
$352,000
—
#22
Minnesota
$329,300
—
#23
Vermont
$316,600
—
#24
Wyoming
$309,700
—
#25
Georgia
$303,300
—
#26
Maine
$296,600
—
#27
North Carolina
$288,900
—
#28
Tennessee
$286,700
—
#29
Texas
$283,800
—
#30
Wisconsin
$266,500
—
#31
Illinois
$263,300
—
#32
South Carolina
$259,000
—
#33
South Dakota
$257,400
—
#34
Pennsylvania
$254,500
—
#35
North Dakota
$249,900
—
#36
New Mexico
$248,100
—
#37
Nebraska
$238,600
—
#38
Michigan
$231,600
—
#39
Missouri
$230,300
—
#40
Indiana
$218,200
—
#41
Kansas
$217,200
—
#42
Louisiana
$216,500
—
#43
Ohio
$214,800
—
#44
Alabama
$209,900
—
#45
Iowa
$208,000
—
#46
Kentucky
$205,600
—
#47
Oklahoma
$199,800
—
#48
Arkansas
$188,000
—
#49
Mississippi
$169,800
—
#50
West Virginia · your comparison
$162,600
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.
This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.
West Virginia · 2020–202448.9%
West Virginia rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Renters · spending at least 30% of income
Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.
Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 48.9%2020–2024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Florida
60.1%
—
#2
Hawaii
56.7%
—
#3
Nevada
55.9%
—
#4
California
55.3%
—
#5
Louisiana
54.8%
—
#6
Colorado
52.9%
—
#7
Connecticut
52.6%
—
#8
Oregon
52.5%
—
#9
Georgia
52.4%
—
#10
South Carolina
52.1%
—
#11
New York
52.1%
—
#12
Massachusetts
51.8%
—
#13
Texas
51.7%
—
#14
New Jersey
51.6%
—
#15
Maryland
51.5%
—
#16
Arizona
51.4%
—
#17
Mississippi
51.3%
—
#18
Michigan
50.4%
—
#19
New Mexico
50.2%
—
#20
Washington
49.9%
—
#21
Delaware
49.6%
—
#22
North Carolina
48.9%
—
#23
West Virginia · your comparison
48.9%
—
#24
Tennessee
48.8%
—
#25
Alabama
48.8%
—
#26
Virginia
48.5%
—
#27
Maine
48.4%
—
#28
Vermont
48.4%
—
#29
New Hampshire
48.2%
—
#30
Pennsylvania
48.2%
—
#31
Minnesota
48.1%
—
#32
Indiana
48.1%
—
#33
Rhode Island
48%
—
#34
Illinois
47.9%
—
#35
Utah
47.2%
—
#36
Idaho
46.9%
—
#37
Oklahoma
46.3%
—
#38
Ohio
45.9%
—
#39
Missouri
45.6%
—
#40
Kentucky
45.4%
—
#41
Nebraska
45.1%
—
#42
Arkansas
44.8%
—
#43
Montana
44.8%
—
#44
Alaska
44.6%
—
#45
Iowa
43.9%
—
#46
Wisconsin
43.7%
—
#47
Kansas
43.5%
—
#48
Wyoming
43.1%
—
#49
South Dakota
39.8%
—
#50
North Dakota
38.9%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.
West Virginia · 2025+58.6%
West Virginia rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Home-price growth since 2016
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.
This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
West Virginia
2025 · West Virginia: +58.6% · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
West Virginia Home-price growth since 2016 history
Period
West Virginia
Compare
2016
+0%
2017
+0.7%
2018
+2.6%
2019
+5.1%
2020
+9.7%
2021
+19.5%
2022
+32.4%
2023
+40.4%
2024
+50%
2025
+58.6%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · +58.6%2025 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Idaho
+141.7%
—
#2
Florida
+114.5%
—
#3
Maine
+113.7%
—
#4
Utah
+113.6%
—
#5
Tennessee
+112.4%
—
#6
Arizona
+112.3%
—
#7
New Hampshire
+110.1%
—
#8
Rhode Island
+108%
—
#9
Georgia
+107.6%
—
#10
North Carolina
+107.1%
—
#11
Montana
+106.7%
—
#12
Nevada
+106.1%
—
#13
South Carolina
+105.5%
—
#14
Washington
+100.2%
—
#15
Indiana
+94.5%
—
#16
Wisconsin
+94%
—
#17
Michigan
+93.7%
—
#18
Ohio
+93.3%
—
#19
Vermont
+92.6%
—
#20
New Jersey
+88.9%
—
#21
Missouri
+86.9%
—
#22
New York
+85.9%
—
#23
Nebraska
+84.6%
—
#24
Massachusetts
+84.3%
—
#24
South Dakota
+84.3%
—
#26
Texas
+83.3%
—
#27
Kentucky
+83.2%
—
#28
Colorado
+83.1%
—
#29
Kansas
+82.5%
—
#30
New Mexico
+82.3%
—
#31
Alabama
+81.3%
—
#32
Arkansas
+80.8%
—
#33
Connecticut
+79.8%
—
#34
Pennsylvania
+78.4%
—
#35
Virginia
+76.5%
—
#36
Delaware
+75.4%
—
#37
Oregon
+74.7%
—
#38
California
+72.7%
—
#39
Oklahoma
+71.9%
—
#40
Minnesota
+70%
—
#41
Wyoming
+69.3%
—
#42
Illinois
+65.3%
—
#43
Iowa
+64.2%
—
#44
Mississippi
+63.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
+63%
—
#46
Maryland
+59.4%
—
#47
West Virginia · your comparison
+58.6%
—
#48
Alaska
+51.9%
—
#49
North Dakota
+45.9%
—
#50
Louisiana
+38.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.
West Virginia · 20253,962
West Virginia rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total housing units authorized
New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.
A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 3,9622025 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
210,217
—
#2
Florida
178,297
—
#3
California
103,856
—
#4
North Carolina
86,167
—
#5
Georgia
61,196
—
#6
Arizona
51,532
—
#7
South Carolina
45,862
—
#8
Tennessee
43,374
—
#9
New York
38,667
—
#10
Washington
34,913
—
#11
Colorado
33,754
—
#12
Ohio
33,640
—
#13
Virginia
33,094
—
#14
Indiana
29,076
—
#15
New Jersey
27,661
—
#16
Utah
26,775
—
#17
Pennsylvania
25,709
—
#18
Wisconsin
25,569
—
#19
Michigan
23,075
—
#20
Minnesota
20,947
—
#21
Alabama
19,061
—
#22
Illinois
18,551
—
#23
Nevada
18,540
—
#24
Idaho
17,944
—
#25
Missouri
17,474
—
#26
Oklahoma
15,513
—
#27
Arkansas
15,492
—
#28
Kentucky
14,940
—
#29
Oregon
14,839
—
#30
Louisiana
14,203
—
#31
Iowa
13,664
—
#32
Maryland
13,358
—
#33
Massachusetts
12,477
—
#34
Nebraska
10,596
—
#35
Kansas
10,299
—
#36
Mississippi
8,405
—
#37
New Mexico
7,747
—
#38
Connecticut
7,273
—
#39
Maine
6,979
—
#40
Delaware
6,468
—
#41
South Dakota
5,305
—
#42
Montana
5,258
—
#43
New Hampshire
5,030
—
#44
West Virginia · your comparison
3,962
—
#45
Hawaii
3,708
—
#46
North Dakota
2,440
—
#47
Vermont
2,294
—
#48
Wyoming
2,238
—
#49
Rhode Island
1,738
—
#50
Alaska
848
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
27 of 27 reviewed West Virginia actions · newest first
Mar 14, 2026 · SB 659 · Prohibiting certain restrictions on regulation of accessory dwelling units · Enacted · Chapter 241West Virginia Legislature · SB 659
Prohibiting certain restrictions on regulation of accessory dwelling units
The enrolled SB 659 limits municipal restrictions on at least one accessory dwelling unit on a single-family lot, including parking requirements, specified design restrictions and fees. A qualifying unit has independent access and its own cooking, sleeping and sanitation facilities on the same parcel as a larger single-family dwelling. Attached and detached units are limited to the lesser of 75% of the main dwelling’s habitable floor area or 1,000 square feet. The $250 impact-fee limit and $250 application-review limit are separate; usual building-permit fees may also apply. Private restrictive covenants remain enforceable. It retains building and safety requirements, historic-district design exceptions and municipal authority over short-term rentals. Conflicting local rules in effect on or after January 1, 2027 are invalid to the extent of the conflict. It does not establish construction, occupancy or lower rents.
Approved by the governor on 2026-03-14, Chapter 241. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Median gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities. Accessory dwellings can be rental housing; permission does not establish that units were built, rented or changed the median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§8-40-1. Definitions. As used in this article: (a) "Accessory dwelling unit" means a self-contained and independently accessed living unit on the same parcel as a single-family dwelling of greater square footage that includes its own cooking, sleeping, and sanitation facilities and complies with, or is otherwise exempt from, any applicable regulatory requirements; (b) "By right" means the ability to be approved without requiring: (1) A public hearing; (2) A variance, conditional use permit, special permit, or special exception; or (3) Other discretionary zoning action other than a determination that a site plan and any construction plans conform with applicable regulatory requirements; (c) "Gross floor area" means the interior habitable area of a single-family dwelling or an accessory dwelling unit; (d)(1) "Regulatory requirements" means the requirements determined by a municipality to be necessary for approval of plans, permits, or applications under this section. (2) "Regulatory requirements" includes: (A) The West Virginia Fire Code as adopted by the State Fire Marshal; (B) Any locally adopted ordinances and amendments to the ordinances; (C) Applicable zoning ordinances and conditions; (D) Design and construction standards, including any applicable building codes; and (E) Other federal, state, and local laws, rules, and ordinances applicable to the plan, permit, or application in question; (e) "Short-term rental" means an individually or collectively owned single-family house or single-family dwelling unit or a unit or group of units in a condominium, cooperative, time-share, or owner-occupied residential home that is offered for a fee for 30 days or less; and (f) "Single-family dwelling" means a building with one or more rooms designed for residential living purposes by one household that is detached from any other dwelling unit. (g) “Manufactured home” means a structure constructed in compliance with the federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, 42 U.S.C. §5401 et seq., and installed on a permanent foundation. §8-40-2. Prohibition on policy regulations restricting accessory dwelling units. (a) Except as provided in this article, a municipality shall not adopt a policy, regulation, or ordinance that restricts, prohibits, or otherwise regulates the use of at least one accessory dwelling unit by right on a lot or parcel that contains a single-family dwelling. (b) An accessory dwelling unit may be attached, detached, or internal to the single-family dwelling on a lot or parcel. (c) If the accessory dwelling unit is detached from or attached to the single-family dwelling, it shall not be more than 75 percent of the gross floor area of the single-family dwelling or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less. (d) A municipality may not: (1) Require that a lot or parcel have additional parking to accommodate an accessory dwelling unit or require fees in lieu of additional parking; (2) Require that an accessory dwelling unit match the exterior design, roof pitch, or finishing materials of the single-family dwelling: Provided, That a municipality may require an accessory dwelling unit to match exterior design, roof pitch, finishing materials, and other design guidelines if the single family dwelling or accessory dwelling unit is located within a historic district, as defined in §8A-1-2 of this code, and the requirement is imposed pursuant to an ordinance or regulation duly adopted for the preservation of that historic district; (3) Require a familial, marital, or employment relationship between the occupants of the single-family dwelling and the occupants of the accessory dwelling unit; (4) Assess development impact fees in excess of $250 on the construction of an accessory dwelling unit; (5) Require improvements to public streets or sidewalks as a condition of permitting an accessory dwelling unit, except as necessary to reconstruct or repair a public street or sidewalk that is disturbed as a result of the construction of the accessory dwelling unit; (6) Set maximum building heights, minimum setback requirements, minimum lot sizes, maximum lot coverages, or minimum building frontages for accessory dwelling units that are more restrictive than those for the single-family dwelling on the lot; (7) Impose more onerous development standards on an accessory dwelling unit beyond those set forth in this article; (8)(A) Require a restrictive covenant concerning an accessory dwelling unit on a parcel zoned for residential use by a single-family dwelling. (B)(i) Paragraph (A) of this subdivision does not prohibit restrictive covenants concerning accessory dwelling units entered into between private parties. (ii) Notwithstanding clause (i) of this paragraph, a municipality shall not condition a permit, license, or use of an accessory dwelling unit on the adoption or implementation of a restrictive covenant entered into between private parties; or (9) Require water and sewer for the accessory dwelling unit separate from that serving the primary structure. (e) A manufactured home may be used as an accessory dwelling unit by right on a lot or parcel that contains a single family dwelling in any zoning district where accessory dwelling units are permitted. (f) A municipality may not prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of a manufactured home as an accessory dwelling unit, provided that the manufactured home is installed on a permanent foundation and complies with applicable building, fire, and safety codes and any other requirements in this article. (g) A municipality may not impose design, aesthetic, age of construction, or prior use requirements on a manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit that are more restrictive than those imposed on site built accessory dwelling units of comparable size. (h) A manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit shall be assessed and taxed as real property. (i) A manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit may share water, sewer, and utility connections with the primary single family dwelling. Separate utility connections or meters may be required only where necessary to protect public health and safety and where such requirements are applied uniformly to all accessory dwelling units. §8-40-3. Exemptions. (a) This article does not prohibit a municipality from regulating short-term rentals. (b)(1)(A) A municipality may require a fee for reviewing applications to create accessory dwelling units; and (B) The application fee may not exceed $250 for each accessory dwelling unit. (2) Subdivision (1) of this subsection does not prohibit a municipality from requiring its usual building fees in addition to the application fee. (c) A policy, regulation, or ordinance in effect on or after January 1, 2027, that applies to an accessory dwelling unit and does not comply with this article is invalid to the extent of its conflict with this article. (d) A municipality may require an accessory dwelling unit to have: (1) A will-serve letter from both the water system and the sewer system that serves the primary dwelling; or (2) Approval from the Department of Health where municipal or private water service or sewer service is not available. (e) This article does not: (1) Supersede applicable regulatory requirements; or (2) Prohibit a municipality from adopting a policy, regulation, or ordinance that is more permissive than the provisions under this article.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 14, 2026 · SB 659 · Prohibiting certain restrictions on regulation of accessory dwelling units · SignedGovernor · SB 659
Prohibiting certain restrictions on regulation of accessory dwelling units
Mar 14, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Patrick Morrisey · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Patrick Morrisey signed SB 659. The enrolled SB 659 limits municipal restrictions on at least one accessory dwelling unit on a single-family lot, including parking requirements, specified design restrictions and fees. A qualifying unit has independent access and its own cooking, sleeping and sanitation facilities on the same parcel as a larger single-family dwelling. Attached and detached units are limited to the lesser of 75% of the main dwelling’s habitable floor area or 1,000 square feet. The $250 impact-fee limit and $250 application-review limit are separate; usual building-permit fees may also apply. Private restrictive covenants remain enforceable. It retains building and safety requirements, historic-district design exceptions and municipal authority over short-term rentals. Conflicting local rules in effect on or after January 1, 2027 are invalid to the extent of the conflict. It does not establish construction, occupancy or lower rents.
Approved by the governor on 2026-03-14, Chapter 241. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Median gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities. Accessory dwellings can be rental housing; permission does not establish that units were built, rented or changed the median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§8-40-1. Definitions. As used in this article: (a) "Accessory dwelling unit" means a self-contained and independently accessed living unit on the same parcel as a single-family dwelling of greater square footage that includes its own cooking, sleeping, and sanitation facilities and complies with, or is otherwise exempt from, any applicable regulatory requirements; (b) "By right" means the ability to be approved without requiring: (1) A public hearing; (2) A variance, conditional use permit, special permit, or special exception; or (3) Other discretionary zoning action other than a determination that a site plan and any construction plans conform with applicable regulatory requirements; (c) "Gross floor area" means the interior habitable area of a single-family dwelling or an accessory dwelling unit; (d)(1) "Regulatory requirements" means the requirements determined by a municipality to be necessary for approval of plans, permits, or applications under this section. (2) "Regulatory requirements" includes: (A) The West Virginia Fire Code as adopted by the State Fire Marshal; (B) Any locally adopted ordinances and amendments to the ordinances; (C) Applicable zoning ordinances and conditions; (D) Design and construction standards, including any applicable building codes; and (E) Other federal, state, and local laws, rules, and ordinances applicable to the plan, permit, or application in question; (e) "Short-term rental" means an individually or collectively owned single-family house or single-family dwelling unit or a unit or group of units in a condominium, cooperative, time-share, or owner-occupied residential home that is offered for a fee for 30 days or less; and (f) "Single-family dwelling" means a building with one or more rooms designed for residential living purposes by one household that is detached from any other dwelling unit. (g) “Manufactured home” means a structure constructed in compliance with the federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, 42 U.S.C. §5401 et seq., and installed on a permanent foundation. §8-40-2. Prohibition on policy regulations restricting accessory dwelling units. (a) Except as provided in this article, a municipality shall not adopt a policy, regulation, or ordinance that restricts, prohibits, or otherwise regulates the use of at least one accessory dwelling unit by right on a lot or parcel that contains a single-family dwelling. (b) An accessory dwelling unit may be attached, detached, or internal to the single-family dwelling on a lot or parcel. (c) If the accessory dwelling unit is detached from or attached to the single-family dwelling, it shall not be more than 75 percent of the gross floor area of the single-family dwelling or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less. (d) A municipality may not: (1) Require that a lot or parcel have additional parking to accommodate an accessory dwelling unit or require fees in lieu of additional parking; (2) Require that an accessory dwelling unit match the exterior design, roof pitch, or finishing materials of the single-family dwelling: Provided, That a municipality may require an accessory dwelling unit to match exterior design, roof pitch, finishing materials, and other design guidelines if the single family dwelling or accessory dwelling unit is located within a historic district, as defined in §8A-1-2 of this code, and the requirement is imposed pursuant to an ordinance or regulation duly adopted for the preservation of that historic district; (3) Require a familial, marital, or employment relationship between the occupants of the single-family dwelling and the occupants of the accessory dwelling unit; (4) Assess development impact fees in excess of $250 on the construction of an accessory dwelling unit; (5) Require improvements to public streets or sidewalks as a condition of permitting an accessory dwelling unit, except as necessary to reconstruct or repair a public street or sidewalk that is disturbed as a result of the construction of the accessory dwelling unit; (6) Set maximum building heights, minimum setback requirements, minimum lot sizes, maximum lot coverages, or minimum building frontages for accessory dwelling units that are more restrictive than those for the single-family dwelling on the lot; (7) Impose more onerous development standards on an accessory dwelling unit beyond those set forth in this article; (8)(A) Require a restrictive covenant concerning an accessory dwelling unit on a parcel zoned for residential use by a single-family dwelling. (B)(i) Paragraph (A) of this subdivision does not prohibit restrictive covenants concerning accessory dwelling units entered into between private parties. (ii) Notwithstanding clause (i) of this paragraph, a municipality shall not condition a permit, license, or use of an accessory dwelling unit on the adoption or implementation of a restrictive covenant entered into between private parties; or (9) Require water and sewer for the accessory dwelling unit separate from that serving the primary structure. (e) A manufactured home may be used as an accessory dwelling unit by right on a lot or parcel that contains a single family dwelling in any zoning district where accessory dwelling units are permitted. (f) A municipality may not prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of a manufactured home as an accessory dwelling unit, provided that the manufactured home is installed on a permanent foundation and complies with applicable building, fire, and safety codes and any other requirements in this article. (g) A municipality may not impose design, aesthetic, age of construction, or prior use requirements on a manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit that are more restrictive than those imposed on site built accessory dwelling units of comparable size. (h) A manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit shall be assessed and taxed as real property. (i) A manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit may share water, sewer, and utility connections with the primary single family dwelling. Separate utility connections or meters may be required only where necessary to protect public health and safety and where such requirements are applied uniformly to all accessory dwelling units. §8-40-3. Exemptions. (a) This article does not prohibit a municipality from regulating short-term rentals. (b)(1)(A) A municipality may require a fee for reviewing applications to create accessory dwelling units; and (B) The application fee may not exceed $250 for each accessory dwelling unit. (2) Subdivision (1) of this subsection does not prohibit a municipality from requiring its usual building fees in addition to the application fee. (c) A policy, regulation, or ordinance in effect on or after January 1, 2027, that applies to an accessory dwelling unit and does not comply with this article is invalid to the extent of its conflict with this article. (d) A municipality may require an accessory dwelling unit to have: (1) A will-serve letter from both the water system and the sewer system that serves the primary dwelling; or (2) Approval from the Department of Health where municipal or private water service or sewer service is not available. (e) This article does not: (1) Supersede applicable regulatory requirements; or (2) Prohibit a municipality from adopting a policy, regulation, or ordinance that is more permissive than the provisions under this article.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 28, 2022 · 2022 HB 4295 · West Virginia flood-insurance office transfer and premium-tax funding · Historical governor approval · SignedGovernor · 2022 HB 4295
West Virginia flood-insurance office transfer and premium-tax funding
Mar 28, 2022 · Historical governor approval · Signed
Jim Justice · Signed · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical enacted law and governor approval
Governor Jim Justice approved HB 4295 on March 28, 2022. The law continues West Virginia’s flood-insurance program and schedules its office and asset transfer from the Insurance Commissioner to Emergency Management for July 1, 2022. It requires floodplain-manager training, public strategic planning and federal-standard land-use/property guidelines, and directs federal and private-market flood-insurance premium taxes to the separate flood fund for program operations and subgrants. General insurance-tax funds and monthly General Revenue transfers remain separate. The general effective date is June 6, 2022; actual transfers, grants, training and plan approvals require independent records. Historical enacted law approved March 28, 2022. The general ninety-day effective date is June 6, 2022; the flood-program office and asset transfers expressly start July 1, 2022. The four published section bodies and the referenced training section were read, but the full historical/current amendment chain, federal and other incorporated authorities, actual asset transfers, delivered training, strategic-plan approvals, subgrants and independently measured outcomes remain unverified. Draft fiscal notes are agency forecasts and reports, not final-law appropriations or proof of completed implementation.
These describe the original enacted law provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Section 15-5-20b: Continue the State Office of the National Flood Insurance Program and require its transfer from the Insurance Commissioner to the Division of Emergency Management on July 1, 2022. The Division must provide office space, equipment and supplies, with partial support from the flood-insurance tax fund; its Director supervises the office and shall employ staff as needed. Require program guidance and the floodplain-manager training referenced in §15-5-20a, plus land-use and development criteria consistent with federal minimum standards. Authorize proposed legislative rules, including rules governing state property in nonparticipating communities. Require a public strategic plan developed with the Director and floodplain managers, initially presented for approval to the State Resiliency Officer and Board and presented and approved no less than biannually thereafter. Require special-hazard state-property guidelines meeting 44 CFR §§60.3, 60.4 and 60.5 (2022), and cooperation with the State Resiliency Office. The source’s biannually wording is retained; actual training, adopted rules and plan approvals require separate evidence.
Section 33-2-23: Assign and transfer the flood-program office’s assets from the Insurance Commissioner to the Division of Emergency Management effective July 1, 2022. The Director may decline assets considered unnecessary for proper program operation. The statutory transfer date is not an independently verified completed inventory or physical transfer.
Section 33-3-14: Require insurers’ sworn annual financial statements and prior-calendar-year premium tax returns by March 1, subject to quarterly-payment provisions, with adjustments and full remittance. Retain the two-percent taxable-premium tax plus the additional tax in §33-3-14a. Route ordinary premium taxes into the separate insurance tax fund and require transfers of amounts not needed for refunds to General Revenue by the last business day of each month. Exclude federal and private-market flood-insurance premium taxes from that fund; route them to the separate flood-insurance tax fund, now subsection (c), for state flood-program operations, floodplain management and subgrants to local governments and other eligible entities after considering Emergency Management recommendations. Delete the old temporary medical-liability-tax dedication to replenish the tobacco settlement account, move the general-transfer wording into subsection (b), and replace old flood-fund subsections (d)/(e). This reenacts existing funds and rates with changed scope and allocation; no actual collection, refund or grant payment is established.
Section 33-3-14a: Retain the additional one-percent taxable-premium tax alongside §33-3-14, applying the regular article’s levy and collection rules. After authorized refund and administration deductions, route amounts through §33-3-14(b) for General Revenue, except federal and private-market flood-insurance premium taxes, which must be deposited and distributed under the flood fund in §33-3-14(c). Delete the former temporary $833,000 medical-liability-tax replenishment provision for the tobacco settlement account. This is a premium-tax allocation rule, not a new personal income tax or proof of actual flood-fund transfers.
Approved 2022-03-28. Historical enacted law approved March 28, 2022. The general ninety-day effective date is June 6, 2022; the flood-program office and asset transfers expressly start July 1, 2022. The four published section bodies and the referenced training section were read, but the full historical/current amendment chain, federal and other incorporated authorities, actual asset transfers, delivered training, strategic-plan approvals, subgrants and independently measured outcomes remain unverified. Draft fiscal notes are agency forecasts and reports, not final-law appropriations or proof of completed implementation.
Why this record is included
Property flood insurance, floodplain land-use/development standards and state-property hazard management directly concern property protection and development; no home-value, rent, mortgage-cost or completed flood-repair outcome is asserted.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: income-taxes · reviewed policy context · education · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Jim Justice approved HB 4295 on March 28, 2022. The law continues West Virginia’s flood-insurance program and schedules its office and asset transfer from the Insurance Commissioner to Emergency Management for July 1, 2022. It requires floodplain-manager training, public strategic planning and federal-standard land-use/property guidelines, and directs federal and private-market flood-insurance premium taxes to the separate flood fund for program operations and subgrants. General insurance-tax funds and monthly General Revenue transfers remain separate. The general effective date is June 6, 2022; actual transfers, grants, training and plan approvals require independent records.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 23, 2022 · HB 4067 (2022) · Approve electronic agency reporting and specified report, study and diabetes-plan repeals · Historical governor approval · SignedGovernor · HB 4067 (2022)
Approve electronic agency reporting and specified report, study and diabetes-plan repeals
Feb 23, 2022 · Historical governor approval · Signed
Jim Justice · Signed · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical enacted law and governor approval
HB 4067 changes agency reporting across workplace, cybersecurity, crime-victim, health, investment and housing programs. It repeals nine sections, including one-time studies and legislative proposals, annual reports, and the Diabetes Action Plan’s planning, tracking and implementation duties. It also removes the watershed report-and-award clause while retaining conditional bond and grant provisions. The final law contains eleven reenacted code bodies and nine section repeals. Historical enacted law and governor approval. Earlier signed bodies of the nine repealed sections were reviewed, with original-versus-codified numbering recorded for diabetes and oral health. Reenacted terms are not all newly created by this bill. Full amendment and incorporated-authority chains, current enforceability, actual reports and program implementation, spending, bond issuance, completed projects, measured outcomes and individual legislators’ votes remain unverified.
These describe the original enacted law provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Section 31-18-24: Provide electronic legislative delivery/publication of the Housing Development Fund’s independent annual audit, with a hard-copy option, and electronic six-month financial and debt reports with hard copies on request. Retain public inspection and legislative demands for information; no household mortgage rate or new loan appropriation is established.
Approved 2022-02-23. Historical enacted law and governor approval. Earlier signed bodies of the nine repealed sections were reviewed, with original-versus-codified numbering recorded for diabetes and oral health. Reenacted terms are not all newly created by this bill. Full amendment and incorporated-authority chains, current enforceability, actual reports and program implementation, spending, bond issuance, completed projects, measured outcomes and individual legislators’ votes remain unverified.
Why this record is included
Direct housing-fund mortgage/loan audit and financial reporting context; no new mortgage-rate mandate or household loan outcomes are inferred.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: crime · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · energy · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 4067 changes agency reporting across workplace, cybersecurity, crime-victim, health, investment and housing programs. It repeals nine sections, including one-time studies and legislative proposals, annual reports, and the Diabetes Action Plan’s planning, tracking and implementation duties. It also removes the watershed report-and-award clause while retaining conditional bond and grant provisions. The final law contains eleven reenacted code bodies and nine section repeals.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Sep 21, 2016 · Flood proclamation 2016-09-21 · 59169 · Tomblin narrows emergency coverage to five counties · Issued historical proclamationGovernor · Flood proclamation 2016-09-21 · 59169
Tomblin narrows emergency coverage to five counties
Sep 21, 2016 · Issued historical proclamation
Earl Ray Tomblin · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical emergency proclamation
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin terminated emergency status in Fayette, Roane and Summers counties and extended it in Clay, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Nicholas and Webster. The signed proclamation describes continuing emergency conditions after the June flooding and retains the five-county declaration until 5 p.m. October 21, 2016, unless subsequently terminated or extended. The county declaration is separate from assistance eligibility and does not authorize a specific housing grant, spending total or measured economic or health outcome. Ending emergency status in three counties does not establish complete recovery there. Final termination or later extensions have not been verified. The original execution block is September 21, 2016. The previous eight-county declaration was scheduled to expire at 5 p.m. that day; this proclamation sets a new conditional expiry of 5 p.m. Friday, October 21, 2016. Continued emergency status follows flood damage to property. It does not authorize a specific housing grant, mortgage change or completed rebuilding.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision 1: Recites the June declaration, June narrowing, July extension and August narrowing after flooding, property damage and loss of human life.
Reviewed provision 2: Terminates emergency status in Fayette, Roane and Summers counties.
Reviewed provision 3: Extends emergency status in Clay, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Nicholas and Webster until 5 p.m. Friday, October 21, 2016, unless subsequently terminated or extended.
Issued historical proclamation on 2016-09-21. The original execution block is September 21, 2016. The previous eight-county declaration was scheduled to expire at 5 p.m. that day; this proclamation sets a new conditional expiry of 5 p.m. Friday, October 21, 2016.
Why this record is included
Continued emergency status follows flood damage to property. It does not authorize a specific housing grant, mortgage change or completed rebuilding.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin terminated emergency status in Fayette, Roane and Summers counties and extended it in Clay, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Nicholas and Webster. The signed proclamation describes continuing emergency conditions after the June flooding and retains the five-county declaration until 5 p.m. October 21, 2016, unless subsequently terminated or extended.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 22, 2016 · Flood proclamation 2016-08-22 · 58071 · Tomblin ends four county emergencies and extends eight · Issued historical proclamationGovernor · Flood proclamation 2016-08-22 · 58071
Tomblin ends four county emergencies and extends eight
Aug 22, 2016 · Issued historical proclamation
Earl Ray Tomblin · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical emergency proclamation
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin ended emergency status in Jackson, Lincoln, Monroe and Pocahontas and extended it in Clay, Fayette, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Nicholas, Roane, Summers and Webster. The signed original scheduled the eight-county extension to end at 5 p.m. September 21, 2016, unless terminated or extended by a later proclamation. The original distinguishes four counties where emergency conditions had abated from eight where they remained. This change does not establish completed rebuilding, end every assistance program or verify the final termination date. Later proclamations and final recovery outcomes remain separate source reviews. August 22 is the signed execution date. The operative expiry is Wednesday, September 21, 2016—not September 22 and not a present emergency-status claim. Continued emergency status follows flood damage to property. It does not authorize a specific housing grant, mortgage change or completed rebuilding.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision 1: Recites June 23 declaration, June 29 narrowing and subsequent extension through August 22.
Reviewed provision 2: Terminates emergency status in Jackson, Lincoln, Monroe, Pocahontas; extends it in Clay, Fayette, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Nicholas, Roane, Summers, Webster until 5 p.m. Wednesday September 21, 2016 unless terminated or extended by subsequent proclamation.
Issued historical proclamation on 2016-08-22. August 22 is the signed execution date. The operative expiry is Wednesday, September 21, 2016—not September 22 and not a present emergency-status claim.
Why this record is included
Continued emergency status follows flood damage to property. It does not authorize a specific housing grant, mortgage change or completed rebuilding.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin ended emergency status in Jackson, Lincoln, Monroe and Pocahontas and extended it in Clay, Fayette, Greenbrier, Kanawha, Nicholas, Roane, Summers and Webster. The signed original scheduled the eight-county extension to end at 5 p.m. September 21, 2016, unless terminated or extended by a later proclamation.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified West Virginia officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s West Virginia candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
8 statements from 2 candidates
2026 West Virginia U.S. House — District 2 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 7 statements
Housing subsidies and down payment assistance for teachers, nurses, social workers, and public safety professionals who commit to underserved communities
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Infrastructure, housing, and transportation
Candidate campaign source
Housing subsidies and down payment assistance for teachers, nurses, social workers, and public safety professionals who commit to underserved communities
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026
As the injuries from war change and a new generation of veterans re-enter civilian life, it is crucial that Congress work with the VA to provide all the resources necessary to ensure a smooth transition for our veterans. This includes continually modernizing efforts in job training and opportunities…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care, addiction, and veterans
Government-published candidate material
As the injuries from war change and a new generation of veterans re-enter civilian life, it is crucial that Congress work with the VA to provide all the resources necessary to ensure a smooth transition for our veterans. This includes continually modernizing efforts in job training and opportunities, mental health services, housing assistance and educational benefits.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published West Virginia candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
West Virginia incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current West Virginia legislators and West Virginia’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from West Virginia’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 West Virginia incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.
Patricia Rucker
West Virginia Senate, District 16 · R–WV
1 proposalView proposals from Patricia RuckerWest Virginia Legislature · SB 659
Prohibiting certain restrictions on regulation of accessory dwelling units
The enrolled SB 659 limits municipal restrictions on at least one accessory dwelling unit on a single-family lot, including parking requirements, specified design restrictions and fees. A qualifying unit has independent access and its own cooking, sleeping and sanitation facilities on the same parcel as a larger single-family dwelling. Attached and detached units are limited to the lesser of 75% of the main dwelling’s habitable floor area or 1,000 square feet. The $250 impact-fee limit and $250 application-review limit are separate; usual building-permit fees may also apply. Private restrictive covenants remain enforceable. It retains building and safety requirements, historic-district design exceptions and municipal authority over short-term rentals. Conflicting local rules in effect on or after January 1, 2027 are invalid to the extent of the conflict. It does not establish construction, occupancy or lower rents.
Approved by the governor on 2026-03-14, Chapter 241. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Median gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities. Accessory dwellings can be rental housing; permission does not establish that units were built, rented or changed the median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§8-40-1. Definitions. As used in this article: (a) "Accessory dwelling unit" means a self-contained and independently accessed living unit on the same parcel as a single-family dwelling of greater square footage that includes its own cooking, sleeping, and sanitation facilities and complies with, or is otherwise exempt from, any applicable regulatory requirements; (b) "By right" means the ability to be approved without requiring: (1) A public hearing; (2) A variance, conditional use permit, special permit, or special exception; or (3) Other discretionary zoning action other than a determination that a site plan and any construction plans conform with applicable regulatory requirements; (c) "Gross floor area" means the interior habitable area of a single-family dwelling or an accessory dwelling unit; (d)(1) "Regulatory requirements" means the requirements determined by a municipality to be necessary for approval of plans, permits, or applications under this section. (2) "Regulatory requirements" includes: (A) The West Virginia Fire Code as adopted by the State Fire Marshal; (B) Any locally adopted ordinances and amendments to the ordinances; (C) Applicable zoning ordinances and conditions; (D) Design and construction standards, including any applicable building codes; and (E) Other federal, state, and local laws, rules, and ordinances applicable to the plan, permit, or application in question; (e) "Short-term rental" means an individually or collectively owned single-family house or single-family dwelling unit or a unit or group of units in a condominium, cooperative, time-share, or owner-occupied residential home that is offered for a fee for 30 days or less; and (f) "Single-family dwelling" means a building with one or more rooms designed for residential living purposes by one household that is detached from any other dwelling unit. (g) “Manufactured home” means a structure constructed in compliance with the federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, 42 U.S.C. §5401 et seq., and installed on a permanent foundation. §8-40-2. Prohibition on policy regulations restricting accessory dwelling units. (a) Except as provided in this article, a municipality shall not adopt a policy, regulation, or ordinance that restricts, prohibits, or otherwise regulates the use of at least one accessory dwelling unit by right on a lot or parcel that contains a single-family dwelling. (b) An accessory dwelling unit may be attached, detached, or internal to the single-family dwelling on a lot or parcel. (c) If the accessory dwelling unit is detached from or attached to the single-family dwelling, it shall not be more than 75 percent of the gross floor area of the single-family dwelling or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less. (d) A municipality may not: (1) Require that a lot or parcel have additional parking to accommodate an accessory dwelling unit or require fees in lieu of additional parking; (2) Require that an accessory dwelling unit match the exterior design, roof pitch, or finishing materials of the single-family dwelling: Provided, That a municipality may require an accessory dwelling unit to match exterior design, roof pitch, finishing materials, and other design guidelines if the single family dwelling or accessory dwelling unit is located within a historic district, as defined in §8A-1-2 of this code, and the requirement is imposed pursuant to an ordinance or regulation duly adopted for the preservation of that historic district; (3) Require a familial, marital, or employment relationship between the occupants of the single-family dwelling and the occupants of the accessory dwelling unit; (4) Assess development impact fees in excess of $250 on the construction of an accessory dwelling unit; (5) Require improvements to public streets or sidewalks as a condition of permitting an accessory dwelling unit, except as necessary to reconstruct or repair a public street or sidewalk that is disturbed as a result of the construction of the accessory dwelling unit; (6) Set maximum building heights, minimum setback requirements, minimum lot sizes, maximum lot coverages, or minimum building frontages for accessory dwelling units that are more restrictive than those for the single-family dwelling on the lot; (7) Impose more onerous development standards on an accessory dwelling unit beyond those set forth in this article; (8)(A) Require a restrictive covenant concerning an accessory dwelling unit on a parcel zoned for residential use by a single-family dwelling. (B)(i) Paragraph (A) of this subdivision does not prohibit restrictive covenants concerning accessory dwelling units entered into between private parties. (ii) Notwithstanding clause (i) of this paragraph, a municipality shall not condition a permit, license, or use of an accessory dwelling unit on the adoption or implementation of a restrictive covenant entered into between private parties; or (9) Require water and sewer for the accessory dwelling unit separate from that serving the primary structure. (e) A manufactured home may be used as an accessory dwelling unit by right on a lot or parcel that contains a single family dwelling in any zoning district where accessory dwelling units are permitted. (f) A municipality may not prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of a manufactured home as an accessory dwelling unit, provided that the manufactured home is installed on a permanent foundation and complies with applicable building, fire, and safety codes and any other requirements in this article. (g) A municipality may not impose design, aesthetic, age of construction, or prior use requirements on a manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit that are more restrictive than those imposed on site built accessory dwelling units of comparable size. (h) A manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit shall be assessed and taxed as real property. (i) A manufactured home used as an accessory dwelling unit may share water, sewer, and utility connections with the primary single family dwelling. Separate utility connections or meters may be required only where necessary to protect public health and safety and where such requirements are applied uniformly to all accessory dwelling units. §8-40-3. Exemptions. (a) This article does not prohibit a municipality from regulating short-term rentals. (b)(1)(A) A municipality may require a fee for reviewing applications to create accessory dwelling units; and (B) The application fee may not exceed $250 for each accessory dwelling unit. (2) Subdivision (1) of this subsection does not prohibit a municipality from requiring its usual building fees in addition to the application fee. (c) A policy, regulation, or ordinance in effect on or after January 1, 2027, that applies to an accessory dwelling unit and does not comply with this article is invalid to the extent of its conflict with this article. (d) A municipality may require an accessory dwelling unit to have: (1) A will-serve letter from both the water system and the sewer system that serves the primary dwelling; or (2) Approval from the Department of Health where municipal or private water service or sewer service is not available. (e) This article does not: (1) Supersede applicable regulatory requirements; or (2) Prohibit a municipality from adopting a policy, regulation, or ordinance that is more permissive than the provisions under this article.
Only current West Virginia officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a West Virginia statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
West Virginia snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to West Virginia, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.