Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price15.07¢/kWh2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.767/gal2026-08 · #38 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$154.762024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
West Virginia over time
Explore West Virginia readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. West Virginia officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a West Virginia effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a West Virginia change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price West Virginia · source units
West VirginiaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
28 of 28 reviewed West Virginia actions match · 27 date markers shown. 80 major events shown separately.
West Virginia · 2024: 15.07¢/kWh · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside West Virginia, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
West Virginia Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
West Virginia · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
West Virginia · 202415.07¢/kWh
West Virginia rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside West Virginia, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
West Virginia
2024 · West Virginia: 15.07¢/kWh · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
West Virginia Residential electricity price history
Period
West Virginia
Compare
2015
10.08¢/kWh
2016
11.44¢/kWh
2017
11.63¢/kWh
2018
11.18¢/kWh
2019
11.25¢/kWh
2020
11.8¢/kWh
2021
12.15¢/kWh
2022
13.23¢/kWh
2023
14.05¢/kWh
2024
15.07¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 15.07¢/kWh2024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia · your comparison
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Lower Atlantic region, including taxes. The region contains Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.783/gal
Weekly change
+7.7¢
One year earlier
$2.949/gal
Change from one year earlier
+91.1¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s Lower Atlantic series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes West Virginia. Changes are calculated from the published August 31, 2026 (prior week), and September 8, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current West Virginia statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Lower Atlantic regional estimate should not be read as West Virginia’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia, and does not represent the price at every station or in every West Virginia community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
West Virginia · 2024$154.76
West Virginia rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
West Virginia
2024 · West Virginia: $154.76 · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
West Virginia Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
West Virginia
Compare
2010
$105.05
2011
$105.89
2012
$106.15
2013
$106.44
2014
$108.14
2015
$111.59
2016
$126.1
2017
$119.3
2018
$126.7
2019
$121.9
2020
$124.09
2021
$129.61
2022
$142.13
2023
$138.56
2024
$154.76
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · $154.762024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia · your comparison
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
West Virginia · 202450.7 TWh
West Virginia rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside West Virginia, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
West Virginia
2024 · West Virginia: 50.7 TWh · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
West Virginia Total electricity generation history
Period
West Virginia
Compare
2015
72.3 TWh
2016
75.9 TWh
2017
73.4 TWh
2018
67.2 TWh
2019
63.9 TWh
2020
56.7 TWh
2021
65.8 TWh
2022
56.7 TWh
2023
52.3 TWh
2024
50.7 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 50.7 TWh2024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia · your comparison
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
West Virginia · 20241,165.5 min/year
West Virginia rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
West Virginia
2024 · West Virginia: 1,165.5 min/year · Rank #7 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
West Virginia Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
West Virginia
Compare
2023
751.5 min/year
2024
1,165.5 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 1,165.5 min/year2024 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia · your comparison
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
West Virginia · 2024141 trillion Btu
West Virginia rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 141 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia · your comparison
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
West Virginia · 202472.28 Mt CO₂
West Virginia rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 72.28 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia · your comparison
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
28 of 28 reviewed West Virginia actions · newest first
Jan 28, 2026 · HB 4885 · To remove the state tax on gasoline at the pumps · Not enactedWest Virginia Legislature · HB 4885
To remove the state tax on gasoline at the pumps
Jan 28, 2026 · Not enacted
Jordan Bridges · Sponsored / Carl "Bill" Roop · Co-sponsored / Adam Vance · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 4885 proposed repealing §11-14C-5, the motor-fuel excise-tax levy and rate section. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session. The proposal concerns West Virginia’s tax component of pump prices, not repeal of taxes in the other five Lower Atlantic states or a demonstrated regional price reduction.
To House Finance. The 2026 regular session ended without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not the adjournment date.
Why this record is included
The fact is the tax-inclusive Lower Atlantic regular-gasoline average for Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. A West Virginia tax repeal proposal concerns one state and one component of the regional price. It establishes no pump-price effect. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A BILL to repeal §11-14C-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to motor fuel excise tax; and removing taxes on gasoline. Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia: ARTICLE 14C. MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAX. §11-14C-5. Taxes levied; rate. [Repealed.]
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 22, 2026 · SB 577 · Relating to electric and natural gas utility rate increases · Not enactedWest Virginia Legislature · SB 577
Relating to electric and natural gas utility rate increases
Jan 22, 2026 · Not enacted
Joey Garcia · Sponsored / Mike Woelfel · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 577 proposed a one-year freeze on electric and natural-gas utility rate increases under the Public Service Commission, including pending cases and approved increases not yet effective. It allowed minimum necessary emergency increases for safe service or extreme financial hardship attributable solely to the freeze, and required an interim study. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session; the electricity connection does not imply rates were frozen.
To Energy, Industry, and Mining. The 2026 regular session ended without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not the adjournment date.
Why this record is included
The fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across customer sectors. The electric-rate portion of the proposal concerns prices; natural gas charges are outside the measure. A proposed freeze does not establish actual prices. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) One-year moratorium. – Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, for a period of one year following the effective date of this section, the commission shall authorize no increase of rates charged by any electric or gas utility subject to its jurisdiction to any customer of any class, and shall, for the same one-year period, suspend and hold in abeyance cases for electric and gas rate increases which are pending before the commission on said effective date. The one-year moratorium on rate increases mandated by this section applies to any electric or gas utility rate increase, including, but not limited to: (1) Any general rate increase application filed pursuant to §24-2-1 et seq. of this code; (2) Any automatic adjustment mechanism or other rate adjustment authorized by this code or by commission order which would result in an increase in rates or other charges to utility customers during the pendency of the one-year moratorium; and (3) Any previously approved electric or gas utility rate increase that has not yet taken effect as of the effective date of this section. (c) Exceptions. – During the one-year moratorium on rate increases mandated by this section, the commission may, upon petition by an electric or natural gas utility, authorize an emergency rate increase otherwise subject to the moratorium if it is determined that such emergency rate is necessary to: (1) Ensure the continued provision of safe and adequate electric or gas service to the utility’s customers; or (2) Protect the utility from extreme financial hardship if such financial hardship is attributable solely to the moratorium on rate increases. Any emergency rate increase authorized pursuant to this subsection shall by limited to the minimum amount necessary to address the reason requiring the rate increase. The commission shall promulgate rules setting forth criteria for determination of the continued provision of safe and adequate utility service and of a utility’s extreme financial hardship within the meaning of this section. (d) Interim study. – During the one-year moratorium mandated by this section, the Joint Committee on Government and Finance shall cause a legislative interim study or studies to be conducted on utility management, rate design, and the causes of and potential legislative remedies for recent dramatic electric and natural gas utility rate increases shouldered by ratepayers in the state.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 23, 2022 · HB 4067 (2022) · Approve electronic agency reporting and specified report, study and diabetes-plan repeals · Historical governor approval · SignedGovernor · HB 4067 (2022)
Approve electronic agency reporting and specified report, study and diabetes-plan repeals
Feb 23, 2022 · Historical governor approval · Signed
Jim Justice · Signed · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical enacted law and governor approval
HB 4067 changes agency reporting across workplace, cybersecurity, crime-victim, health, investment and housing programs. It repeals nine sections, including one-time studies and legislative proposals, annual reports, and the Diabetes Action Plan’s planning, tracking and implementation duties. It also removes the watershed report-and-award clause while retaining conditional bond and grant provisions. The final law contains eleven reenacted code bodies and nine section repeals. Historical enacted law and governor approval. Earlier signed bodies of the nine repealed sections were reviewed, with original-versus-codified numbering recorded for diabetes and oral health. Reenacted terms are not all newly created by this bill. Full amendment and incorporated-authority chains, current enforceability, actual reports and program implementation, spending, bond issuance, completed projects, measured outcomes and individual legislators’ votes remain unverified.
These describe the original enacted law provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Section 22A-6-11: Repeal the Board of Coal Mine Health and Safety’s study of methane-detecting automatic shut-off devices on mining extraction equipment, including longwall shears and cutter heads. The board was to assess safety benefits and whether mandatory installation was warranted, and report recommendations to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance by December 31, 2011. This was a study of possible requirements, not a general detector-installation mandate.
Section 22A-6-12: Repeal the Board of Coal Mine Health and Safety’s study of expanding protections for whistleblowers and miners who refuse perceived unsafe underground work. The study addressed encouraging withdrawal from and reporting of unsafe conditions, investigating patterns of retribution, and recommending additional protections to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance by December 31, 2011. Repealing this study does not itself repeal all existing whistleblower protections.
Section 22A-6-13: Repeal the Board of Coal Mine Health and Safety’s study of working or traveling in bleeder or gob areas of longwall panels and pillar sections with only one travelable entrance and exit. The study was to consider roof-control or other measures providing safety comparable to multiple-entry areas, and report implementation recommendations to the Joint Committee on Government and Finance by December 31, 2012. The section was a study directive; its repeal does not establish changes to all mine roof-control rules or actual injury rates.
Approved 2022-02-23. Historical enacted law and governor approval. Earlier signed bodies of the nine repealed sections were reviewed, with original-versus-codified numbering recorded for diabetes and oral health. Reenacted terms are not all newly created by this bill. Full amendment and incorporated-authority chains, current enforceability, actual reports and program implementation, spending, bond issuance, completed projects, measured outcomes and individual legislators’ votes remain unverified.
Why this record is included
Coal mine board safety-study section repeals, directly concerning the coal sector. No electricity-price or coal-output effect is inferred.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: crime · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context · housing-borrowing · reviewed policy context · energy · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 4067 changes agency reporting across workplace, cybersecurity, crime-victim, health, investment and housing programs. It repeals nine sections, including one-time studies and legislative proposals, annual reports, and the Diabetes Action Plan’s planning, tracking and implementation duties. It also removes the watershed report-and-award clause while retaining conditional bond and grant provisions. The final law contains eleven reenacted code bodies and nine section repeals.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Nov 4, 2016 · Executive Order 7-16 · Abolish eighteen historical boards and task forces · Historical governor action issuedGovernor · Executive Order 7-16
Abolish eighteen historical boards and task forces
Nov 4, 2016 · Historical governor action issued
Earl Ray Tomblin · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical governor task-force action
On November 4, 2016, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin abolished the following bodies relevant to this topic: Marcellus to Manufacturing Task Force. The signed order lists eighteen entities in total. This order abolishes the named entities. It does not establish that each completed its work, repeal all related laws, close the hospital, end unemployment benefits, quantify budget savings or prove economic or health outcomes. The Natural Gas Vehicle Task Force and Oil and Natural Gas Industry Safety Commission are not named in this order. Most original creating orders, transferred functions and subsequent law remain under review.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision 18: Abolish the Marcellus to Manufacturing Task Force. The order identifies its creation as EO1-11, February 15, 2011.
Historical action dated 2016-11-04. This order abolishes the named entities. It does not establish that each completed its work, repeal all related laws, close the hospital, end unemployment benefits, quantify budget savings or prove economic or health outcomes. The Natural Gas Vehicle Task Force and Oil and Natural Gas Industry Safety Commission are not named in this order. Most original creating orders, transferred functions and subsequent law remain under review.
Why this record is included
Entry18 abolishes the2011Marcellus to Manufacturing Task Force. Its fully read creating order addresses natural-gas conversion,processing,storage and infrastructure planning, without proving changes to energy production or prices.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: crime · reviewed policy context · health · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context · education · reviewed policy context · energy · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
On November 4, 2016, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin abolished the following bodies relevant to this topic: Marcellus to Manufacturing Task Force. The signed order lists eighteen entities in total.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 29, 2016 · 2016 Senate Bill 419 · Sign changes to dedicated tax and insurance revenues · Historical law signedGovernor · 2016 Senate Bill 419
Sign changes to dedicated tax and insurance revenues
Feb 29, 2016 · Historical law signed
Earl Ray Tomblin · Signed · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical budget or benefit action
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin signed 2016 SB419 on February 29, 2016, after passage effective February 26. The act ends specified personal-income-tax worker-compensation transfers, changes timber and additional severance-tax schedules, delays FY2016 retiree-health transfers, and authorizes conditional FY2016 and half-share FY2017 dedicated-revenue redirects. Historical signed act; retained 2005/2008/2009/2014 framework is not newly implemented in 2016. No actual fund transfers, tax receipts, debt retirement, actuarial certification, utility-price effect or present tax rate verified. Incorporated distribution beneficiaries, prior/later/current law, amendments and individual votes remain under review. Kessler is the historical Senate sponsor by request of the executive; this does not make him a current incumbent.
These describe the original enacted law provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision 11-13V-4: Retain historical additional coal 56 cents/ton, gas 4.7 cents/mcf and timber 2.78% taxes, one-time coal/gas measure and conditional PSC utility fuel-cost deferral. Redirect net receipts only with greater-than-$100 million December 1, 2015 shortfall during after February 29 before July 1, 2016. Terminate additional taxes July 1, 2016 or earlier governor order; prior liabilities survive.
Historical action dated 2016-02-29. Historical signed act; retained 2005/2008/2009/2014 framework is not newly implemented in 2016. No actual fund transfers, tax receipts, debt retirement, actuarial certification, utility-price effect or present tax rate verified. Incorporated distribution beneficiaries, prior/later/current law, amendments and individual votes remain under review. Kessler is the historical Senate sponsor by request of the executive; this does not make him a current incumbent.
Why this record is included
11-13V-4 governs coal/gas severance taxes, conditional utility fuel-cost deferral and additional-tax termination; no actual utility bill or production outcome.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context · energy · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin signed 2016 SB419 on February 29, 2016, after passage effective February 26. The act ends specified personal-income-tax worker-compensation transfers, changes timber and additional severance-tax schedules, delays FY2016 retiree-health transfers, and authorizes conditional FY2016 and half-share FY2017 dedicated-revenue redirects.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Feb 29, 2016 · Executive Order 1-16 · Redirect specified FY2016 revenues to General Revenue · Historical governor action issuedGovernor · Executive Order 1-16
Redirect specified FY2016 revenues to General Revenue
Feb 29, 2016 · Historical governor action issued
Earl Ray Tomblin · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical budget or benefit action
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin redirected specified additional severance-tax, workers’ compensation surcharge and lottery receipts to General Revenue for March 1–June 30, 2016, using the conditional authority in signed SB419. Signed February 29, 2016, before the stated March 1revenue period. The original prints a forecast "$59.4" without a million unit; this unresolved omission is not normalized. The recited $114.484 million Budget Office certification is not its independently read letter. No completed transfer amount or current tax rate is verified.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision 1: Redirect 11-13V-4 additional coal, natural-gas and timber severance-tax deposits to General Revenue during March 1–June 30, 2016. The act conditions this authority on a Budget Office December 1, 2015 shortfall greater than $100 million; this order does not change severance-tax rates.
Reviewed provision 5: Direct the Secretary of Revenue to issue implementation instructions.
Historical action dated 2016-02-29. Signed February 29, 2016, before the stated March 1revenue period. The original prints a forecast "$59.4" without a million unit; this unresolved omission is not normalized. The recited $114.484 million Budget Office certification is not its independently read letter. No completed transfer amount or current tax rate is verified.
Why this record is included
Paragraph1redirects receipts including additional coal and natural-gas severance taxes; it does not amend the tax rates or establish energy output/utility-price effects.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: income-taxes · reviewed policy context · energy · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin redirected specified additional severance-tax, workers’ compensation surcharge and lottery receipts to General Revenue for March 1–June 30, 2016, using the conditional authority in signed SB419.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified West Virginia officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s West Virginia candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
8 statements from 6 candidates
2026 West Virginia U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements
Without coal and farmers, many West Virginian families would not be able to survive. I want West Virginia, and America to have a thriving economy, which is why we must be energy independent and support our famers. We cannot strip the economy by completing eliminating fossil fuels. And we must elimin…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Belinda Fox-Spencer
Candidate campaign source
Without coal and farmers, many West Virginian families would not be able to survive. I want West Virginia, and America to have a thriving economy, which is why we must be energy independent and support our famers. We cannot strip the economy by completing eliminating fossil fuels. And we must eliminate excessive regulations that make agriculture production and innovation more difficult. They limit farmers' and ranchers' ability to manage risk, work their land, and provide affordable food for American families. I will fight to build a better economy for the families of West Virginia.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
I also believe in a free market that allows renewable energy to expand in West Virginia if that’s what businesses want to do. This would create more jobs and lower electrical costs.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
I also believe in a free market that allows renewable energy to expand in West Virginia if that’s what businesses want to do. This would create more jobs and lower electrical costs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026
Invest in Addiction Frontline Workers Loneliness and lack of support are to addiction what gasoline is to fire. We need to fund social workers and resources to help people recovering a sense of community and support.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care, addiction, and veterans
Candidate campaign source
Invest in Addiction Frontline Workers Loneliness and lack of support are to addiction what gasoline is to fire. We need to fund social workers and resources to help people recovering a sense of community and support.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026
Cut fossil fuel subsidies for companies that have wasted public resources and invest them in Appalachian energy sectors that have been good stewards of public investments.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
Cut fossil fuel subsidies for companies that have wasted public resources and invest them in Appalachian energy sectors that have been good stewards of public investments.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026
Fossil fuels power America’s economy and provide high quality jobs to West Virginians. Yet radical Democrats are trying to shut down the coal industry and throttle our burgeoning natural gas sector. They’re actively trying to kill thousands of West Virginia jobs. I won’t let that happen. I will stan…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
Fossil fuels power America’s economy and provide high quality jobs to West Virginians. Yet radical Democrats are trying to shut down the coal industry and throttle our burgeoning natural gas sector. They’re actively trying to kill thousands of West Virginia jobs. I won’t let that happen. I will stand up for our coal and gas industries in West Virginia, as I have as your State Treasurer. Our miners deserve our support. I’ll make sure they have it.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The government must encourage investment in sustainable energy sources that minimally affect the environment and utilize free natural resources such as solar, wind and water power. Energy sources that result in extreme and ongoing environmental harm or require the use of military operations to steal…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and natural resources
Candidate campaign source
The government must encourage investment in sustainable energy sources that minimally affect the environment and utilize free natural resources such as solar, wind and water power. Energy sources that result in extreme and ongoing environmental harm or require the use of military operations to steal the resources of other countries are unsustainable, inhumane and cost-prohibitive. Coal powered plants are an essential part of America's energy portfolio, but must be managed in the cleanest possible manner with real costs accruing to companies and those managing the plants and production themselves.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026
West Virginia families are being crushed by inflation, runaway energy costs, and a federal government that punishes producers and rewards dependence. Marshall will fight to unleash West Virginia's energy economy, cut regulations that strangle small businesses, and put hard-working Mountain State fam…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Where Marshall Stands
Candidate campaign source
West Virginia families are being crushed by inflation, runaway energy costs, and a federal government that punishes producers and rewards dependence. Marshall will fight to unleash West Virginia's energy economy, cut regulations that strangle small businesses, and put hard-working Mountain State families first.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published West Virginia candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
West Virginia incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current West Virginia legislators and West Virginia’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from West Virginia’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 West Virginia incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Joey Garcia
West Virginia Senate, District 13 · D–WV
1 proposalView proposals from Joey GarciaWest Virginia Legislature · SB 577
Relating to electric and natural gas utility rate increases
Jan 22, 2026 · Not enacted
Joey Garcia · Sponsored / Mike Woelfel · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 577 proposed a one-year freeze on electric and natural-gas utility rate increases under the Public Service Commission, including pending cases and approved increases not yet effective. It allowed minimum necessary emergency increases for safe service or extreme financial hardship attributable solely to the freeze, and required an interim study. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session; the electricity connection does not imply rates were frozen.
To Energy, Industry, and Mining. The 2026 regular session ended without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not the adjournment date.
Why this record is included
The fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across customer sectors. The electric-rate portion of the proposal concerns prices; natural gas charges are outside the measure. A proposed freeze does not establish actual prices. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) One-year moratorium. – Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, for a period of one year following the effective date of this section, the commission shall authorize no increase of rates charged by any electric or gas utility subject to its jurisdiction to any customer of any class, and shall, for the same one-year period, suspend and hold in abeyance cases for electric and gas rate increases which are pending before the commission on said effective date. The one-year moratorium on rate increases mandated by this section applies to any electric or gas utility rate increase, including, but not limited to: (1) Any general rate increase application filed pursuant to §24-2-1 et seq. of this code; (2) Any automatic adjustment mechanism or other rate adjustment authorized by this code or by commission order which would result in an increase in rates or other charges to utility customers during the pendency of the one-year moratorium; and (3) Any previously approved electric or gas utility rate increase that has not yet taken effect as of the effective date of this section. (c) Exceptions. – During the one-year moratorium on rate increases mandated by this section, the commission may, upon petition by an electric or natural gas utility, authorize an emergency rate increase otherwise subject to the moratorium if it is determined that such emergency rate is necessary to: (1) Ensure the continued provision of safe and adequate electric or gas service to the utility’s customers; or (2) Protect the utility from extreme financial hardship if such financial hardship is attributable solely to the moratorium on rate increases. Any emergency rate increase authorized pursuant to this subsection shall by limited to the minimum amount necessary to address the reason requiring the rate increase. The commission shall promulgate rules setting forth criteria for determination of the continued provision of safe and adequate utility service and of a utility’s extreme financial hardship within the meaning of this section. (d) Interim study. – During the one-year moratorium mandated by this section, the Joint Committee on Government and Finance shall cause a legislative interim study or studies to be conducted on utility management, rate design, and the causes of and potential legislative remedies for recent dramatic electric and natural gas utility rate increases shouldered by ratepayers in the state.
West Virginia House of Delegates, District 33 · R–WV
1 proposalView proposals from Jordan BridgesWest Virginia Legislature · HB 4885
To remove the state tax on gasoline at the pumps
Jan 28, 2026 · Not enacted
Jordan Bridges · Sponsored / Carl "Bill" Roop · Co-sponsored / Adam Vance · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 4885 proposed repealing §11-14C-5, the motor-fuel excise-tax levy and rate section. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session. The proposal concerns West Virginia’s tax component of pump prices, not repeal of taxes in the other five Lower Atlantic states or a demonstrated regional price reduction.
To House Finance. The 2026 regular session ended without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not the adjournment date.
Why this record is included
The fact is the tax-inclusive Lower Atlantic regular-gasoline average for Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. A West Virginia tax repeal proposal concerns one state and one component of the regional price. It establishes no pump-price effect. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A BILL to repeal §11-14C-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to motor fuel excise tax; and removing taxes on gasoline. Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia: ARTICLE 14C. MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAX. §11-14C-5. Taxes levied; rate. [Repealed.]
Only current West Virginia officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a West Virginia statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
West Virginia snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to West Virginia, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.