West Virginia · individual fact

West Virginia crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and West Virginia public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate263.8 per 100k2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,183.5 per 100k2024 · #45 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage92.1%2024 · #44 of 50 · highest first

West Virginia over time

Explore West Virginia readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. West Virginia officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a West Virginia effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a West Virginia change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate West Virginia · source units
West VirginiaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 263.8 per 100k250.4 per 100k319.8 per 100k389.1 per 100kWest Virginia, 2015: 342.7 per 100kWest Virginia, 2016: 370.4 per 100kWest Virginia, 2017: 375.7 per 100kWest Virginia, 2018: 306.2 per 100kWest Virginia, 2019: 301.1 per 100kWest Virginia, 2020: 330.5 per 100kWest Virginia, 2021: 300 per 100kWest Virginia, 2022: 297.5 per 100kWest Virginia, 2023: 282.5 per 100kWest Virginia, 2024: 263.8 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 51National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActWest Virginia · Establish the Statewide Interoperable Radio Network · 2011-06-16EO 2-11West Virginia · Create substance-abuse advisory council and six regional task forces · 2011-09-06EO 5-11West Virginia · Legislature passes horizontal-well regulation law · 2011-12-14HB 401 passedWest Virginia · Accept O. C. Spaulding’s resignation and direct limited-term retirement pay · 2011-12-22EO 7-11West Virginia · Approve horizontal-well regulation and surface-owner protections · 2011-12-22HB 401 approvedWest Virginia · Accept Arthur M. Recht’s judicial retirement and certify pension eligibility · 2012-01-31Judicial retirement orderWest Virginia · Coordinate state security and financial planning for the 2013 Scout Jamboree · 2012-02-10EO 1-12National context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationWest Virginia · Emergency support authorized for the planned Scout Jamboree · 2013-06-28Jamboree support authorizedWest Virginia · Direct FY2014 General Revenue spending reductions · 2014-01-03Budget order 1-14West Virginia · Revise radio-network staffing, financial reporting and purchase approvals · 2014-07-09EO 5-14West Virginia · Create a juvenile-justice reform analysis task force · 2014-07-16EO 6-14National context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationWest Virginia · Direct FY2015 General Revenue spending reductions · 2015-06-09Budget order 3-15West Virginia · Direct FY2016 General Revenue spending reductions · 2015-10-22Budget order 7-15West Virginia · Coordinate state security and financial planning for the 2017 Scout Jamboree · 2016-09-30EO 6-16West Virginia · Abolish eighteen historical boards and task forces · 2016-11-04Historical bodies abolishedWest Virginia · Direct FY2017 General Revenue spending reductions · 2016-11-15Budget order 9-16National context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingWest Virginia · HB 4067 (2022) passes and takes effect · 2022-02-10HB 4067 (2022) passedWest Virginia · Approve electronic agency reporting and specified report, study and diabetes-plan repeals · 2022-02-23HB 4067 (2022) approvedNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● West Virginia Legislature · 42● U.S. Congress · West Virginia delegation · 1◆ Governor · 1922■ West Virginia agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-01-012026-08-31

24 of 24 reviewed West Virginia actions match · 21 date markers shown. 51 major events shown separately.

West Virginia · 2024: 263.8 per 100k · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. West Virginia's average monthly population coverage remained below 90% from 2015 through 2022 (83.8%–88.9%); those years are flagged and may understate reported rates. Coverage rose above the warning threshold in 2023. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
West Virginia Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodWest VirginiaRankU.S. benchmark
2024263.8 per 100k#31 of 50Not available
2023282.5 per 100k#31 of 50Not available
2022297.5 per 100k#33 of 50Not available
2021300 per 100k#31 of 50Not available
2020330.5 per 100k#28 of 50Not available
2019301.1 per 100k#29 of 50Not available
2018306.2 per 100k#31 of 50Not available
2017375.7 per 100k#23 of 50Not available
2016370.4 per 100k#26 of 50Not available
2015342.7 per 100k#26 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

West Virginia · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

West Virginia · 2024263.8 per 100k
West Virginia rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. West Virginia's average monthly population coverage remained below 90% from 2015 through 2022 (83.8%–88.9%); those years are flagged and may understate reported rates. Coverage rose above the warning threshold in 2023. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

West Virginia
Reported violent-crime rate history in West Virginia247 per 100k319.8 per 100k392.5 per 100k20152024
2024 · West Virginia: 263.8 per 100k · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
West Virginia Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodWest VirginiaCompare
2015342.7 per 100k
2016370.4 per 100k
2017375.7 per 100k
2018306.2 per 100k
2019301.1 per 100k
2020330.5 per 100k
2021300 per 100k
2022297.5 per 100k
2023282.5 per 100k
2024263.8 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

West Virginia · 263.8 per 100k2024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia · your comparison263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

263.8 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • West Virginia's average monthly population coverage remained below 90% from 2015 through 2022 (83.8%–88.9%); those years are flagged and may understate reported rates. Coverage rose above the warning threshold in 2023.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 92.1%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

1,183.5 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • West Virginia's average monthly population coverage remained below 90% from 2015 through 2022 (83.8%–88.9%); those years are flagged and may understate reported rates. Coverage rose above the warning threshold in 2023.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 92.1%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
West Virginia · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

West Virginia · 2024281
West Virginia rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

West Virginia · 2812024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia · your comparison281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

2812024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
15.3 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data.

  • The total combines firearm deaths across intents, including suicide, homicide, legal intervention, and unintentional or undetermined injury.
  • It does not measure nonfatal injuries, firearm ownership, defensive uses, or policy effects.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s West Virginia candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

4 statements from 2 candidates

2026 West Virginia U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Ace Parsi

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · WV

Policing & criminal justice context

Defund ICE and reinvest the funds in community policing models that build trust between officers and the communities they serve

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration, border security, and due process

Candidate campaign source

Defund ICE and reinvest the funds in community policing models that build trust between officers and the communities they serve

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026

Ace Parsi — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Ace Parsi
Policing & criminal justice context

Treat our law enforcement officers as partners — not budget items to cut or political props to exploit

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Treat our law enforcement officers as partners — not budget items to cut or political props to exploit

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026

Ace Parsi — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Support law enforcement professionalism while ensuring accountability structures that reflect community values

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Support law enforcement professionalism while ensuring accountability structures that reflect community values

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026

Ace Parsi — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Riley Moore

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · WV

Policing & criminal justice context

A nation without a border is not a nation. The Biden administration’s abdication of its responsibility to secure our border is unacceptable. Indeed, it’s criminal. When I get to Congress I will work with President Trump to finish the border wall and empower law enforcement with the authority necessa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration, border security, and due process

Candidate campaign source

A nation without a border is not a nation. The Biden administration’s abdication of its responsibility to secure our border is unacceptable. Indeed, it’s criminal. When I get to Congress I will work with President Trump to finish the border wall and empower law enforcement with the authority necessary to send illegal immigrants back. We cannot allow terrorists and drug smugglers to continue to enter our nation unchecked. The only acceptable level of illegal immigration is zero.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Riley Moore — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published West Virginia candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

West Virginia incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current West Virginia legislators and West Virginia’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from West Virginia’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 West Virginia incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Bill Ridenour

West Virginia House of Delegates, District 100 · R–WV

1 proposal
View proposals from Bill Ridenour
West Virginia Legislature · HB 4433

Prohibiting Human Smuggling and Trafficking

Mar 14, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 191

Bill Ridenour · Sponsored / Jim Butler · Co-sponsored / Phil Mallow · Co-sponsored / Carl Martin · Co-sponsored / Rick Hillenbrand · Co-sponsored / Bryan Ward · Co-sponsored / Laura Kimble · Co-sponsored / D. Rolland Jennings · Co-sponsored / James Robert "JB" Akers II · Co-sponsored / Jordan Maynor · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 4433 creates adult and minor human-smuggling offenses and defines smuggling around knowing and willful conduct intended to avoid enforcement. The definition covers people without lawful U.S. status, including those who violated their admission terms. Adult smuggling or knowingly and willfully assisting it carries 2–10 years; the corresponding minor offense carries 3–15 years. Offenses involving a minor victim bar parole; an aggravating-circumstance finding imposes at least five years before parole on an indeterminate sentence. The transportation exception covers voluntary transport by immediate family and specified lawful federal or other-state government work through West Virginia. The advocacy-and-shelter exception is tied to the listed federal requirements and excludes knowingly and willfully evading enforcement. Medical and mental-health services are exempt; the attorney/support-staff exemption requires an active attorney-client relationship in a criminal case against the person or litigation about federal immigration or naturalization status. This connection concerns its immigration-related smuggling provisions, not all foreign-born residents or proof of current enforcement.

Approved by the governor on 2026-03-14, Chapter 191. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens, lawful noncitizens and people without lawful status. The selected provisions concern subsets of that population; they do not establish anyone’s immigration status or change birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained West Virginia evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

“(6)(A) "Human Smuggling", "smuggling", or "smuggles" means knowingly and willfully transporting, transferring, receiving, isolating, enticing, or harboring an illegal alien for the purposes of avoiding enforcement of the laws of this state, another state, or the United States. (B) The term “human smuggling” under this article does not apply to: (i) The voluntary transportation of an illegal alien by an immediate family member; (ii) Any person acting within the scope of employment, or hired or contracted, by the federal government or another state, who is acting in a manner consistent with the laws of this state and the United States, and who is transporting an illegal alien through this state; or (iii) Any person acting within the scope of his or her lawful employment or fulfilling a lawful contractual duty who is providing advocacy and shelter services required by 28 C.F.R. 90.4(c), 28 C.F.R. § 94.103(a), 28 C.F.R. § 94.116, and 45 C.F.R. 1370.2: Provided, That the person is not knowingly and willfully attempting to evade enforcement of the laws of this state, another state, or the United States. (C) Any illegal alien being transported through this state shall not be transported to this state for permanent placement.” (7) "Human trafficking", "trafficking", or "traffics" means knowingly recruiting, transporting, transferring, harboring, receiving, providing, obtaining, isolating, maintaining, or enticing an individual to engage in debt bondage, forced labor, or sexual servitude. (8) "Identification document" means a passport, driver’s license, immigration document, travel document, or other government-issued identification document, including a document issued by a foreign government. (9) “Illegal alien" means any individual who has entered the United States without authorization and is subject to removal if apprehended, an individual who was lawfully admitted into the United States but has since violated the terms of admission, or an individual who is otherwise unlawfully present in the United States as provided under federal immigration law. (10) “Immediate family member” means a person’s spouse, parent or step-parent, child, stepchild, or adopted child, grandparent or step-grandparent, grandchild or step-grandchild, sibling, including step-siblings and adopted siblings. The terms “step” and “adopted” include persons related by marriage or legal adoption in the same manner as those related by blood. (11) "Labor or services" means activity having economic value. (12) "Minor" means a person younger than 18 years of age or a person representing himself or herself to be a minor. Any prosecution, pursuant to this article, relating to a person that is representing himself or herself to be a minor shall be limited to investigations being conducted or overseen by law-enforcement officers. (13) "Patronize" means giving, agreeing to give, or offering to give anything of value to another person in exchange for commercial sexual activity. (14) "Person" means an individual, estate, business or nonprofit entity, or other legal entity. The term does not include a public corporation or government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality. (15) "Serious harm" means harm, whether physical or nonphysical, including psychological, economic, or reputational, to an individual which would compel a reasonable individual of the same background and in the same circumstances to perform or continue to perform labor or services or sexual activity to avoid incurring the harm. (16) "Sexual activity" means sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or sexual intrusion as defined in §61-8b-1 of this code, or sexually explicit conduct as defined in §61-8-1 of this code. (17) "Sexual servitude" means: (A) Maintaining or making available a minor for the purpose of engaging the minor in commercial sexual activity; or (B) Using coercion to compel an adult to engage in commercial sexual activity. (18) "Victim" means an individual who is subjected to human trafficking, regardless of whether a perpetrator is prosecuted or convicted. §61-14-2. Human trafficking of an individual; aiding and abetting human trafficking; human smuggling of an individual; aiding and abetting human smuggling; penalties. (a) Any person who knowingly and willfully traffics an adult, or who knowingly and willfully aids, assists, or abets in any manner in the trafficking of an adult, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be confined in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than three years nor more than 15 years. (b) Any person who knowingly and willfully traffics a minor, or who knowingly and willfully aids, assists, or abets in any manner in the trafficking of a minor, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be confined in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than five years nor more than 20 years. (c) Any person who knowingly and willfully smuggles an adult, or who knowingly and willfully aids, assists, or abets in any manner in the smuggling of an adult, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be confined in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than two years nor more than 10 years. (d) Any person who knowingly and willfully smuggles a minor, or who knowingly and willfully aids, assists, or abets in any manner in the smuggling of a minor, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be confined in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than three nor more than 15 years. (e) Whenever a vessel, vehicle, or aircraft is used in human trafficking or human smuggling and the owner, operator, master, pilot, conductor, driver, or any other person in charge thereof is subject to criminal penalties pursuant to a conviction for a violation of §61-14-2 of this code, the conveyance involved is subject to seizure, forfeiture, and sale in accordance with the provisions of §60A-7-701 et seq. of this code: Provided, That the owner knowingly and willfully engaged in human trafficking or human smuggling in violation of §61-14-2 of this code. §61-14-3. Use of forced labor; penalties. (a) Any person who knowingly uses an adult in forced labor is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than three nor more than 15 years. (b) Any person who knowingly uses a minor in forced labor is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than five years nor more than 20 years. §61-14-4. Use of persons in debt bondage; penalties. (a) Any person who knowingly uses an adult in debt bondage is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than three nor more than 15 years. (b) Any person who knowingly uses a minor in debt bondage is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than five years nor more than 20 years. §61-14-5. Sexual servitude; penalties. (a) Any person who knowingly uses coercion to compel an adult to engage in commercial sexual activity is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility for a determinate sentence of not less than 25 years. (b) Any person who knowingly maintains or makes available a minor for the purpose of engaging the minor in commercial sexual activity is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility for a determinate sentence of not less than 50 years. (c) It is not a defense in a prosecution under subsection (b) of this section that the minor consented to engage in commercial sexual activity, or that the defendant believed the minor was an adult. §61-14-6. Patronizing a victim of sexual servitude; penalties. (a) Any person who knowingly patronizes another in commercial sexual activity and who knows that such person patronized is a victim of sexual servitude, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than two years nor more than 10 years. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, any person who knowingly patronizes a minor to engage in commercial sexual activity and who knows or has reason to know that the minor is a victim of sexual servitude, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility for an indeterminate sentence of not less than five nor more than 20 years. §61-14-7. General provisions and other penalties. (a) Separate violations. — For purposes of this article, each adult or minor victim constitutes a separate offense. (b) Aggravating circumstance. — (1) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, if an individual is convicted of an offense under this article and the trier of fact makes a finding that the offense involved an aggravating circumstance, the individual is not eligible for parole before serving five years in a state correctional facility when the sentence is of an indeterminate nature. (2) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, if an individual is convicted of an offense under this article in which the victim is a minor, that individual is not eligible for parole. (3) For purposes of this subsection, "aggravating circumstance" means any of the following: (A) The individual recruited, enticed, or obtained the victim from a shelter or facility that provides services to runaway youth, children in foster care, the homeless, or victims of human trafficking, domestic violence, or sexual assault; or (B) The human trafficking or smuggling offense involved one or more of the following: (i) The use of a deadly weapon, or the threat of use of a deadly weapon; (ii) Bodily injury or disfigurement to any individual who was trafficked or smuggled; (iii) The commission of a sexual offense against any individual who was trafficked or smuggled, or causing individuals being trafficked or smuggled to become a victim of a sexual offense; or (iv) Causing any individual to engage in sexual servitude. (c) Restitution. — (1) The court shall order a person convicted of an offense under this article to pay restitution to the victim of the offense. Restitution may also be awarded to any third parties, public or private, who incurred costs as a result of any offense under this article. (2) A judgment order for restitution may be enforced by the state or a victim named in the order to receive the restitution in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action in accordance with §61-11A-4 of this code, including filing a lien against the person, firm, or corporation against whom restitution is ordered. (3) The court shall order restitution under subdivision (1) of this subsection even if the victim is unavailable to accept payment of restitution. (4) If the victim does not claim restitution ordered under subdivision (1) of this subsection within five years of the entry of the order, the restitution shall be paid to the Crime Victims Compensation Fund created under §14-2A-4 of this code. (d) Eligibility for Compensation Fund. — Notwithstanding the definition of victim in §14-2A-3 of this code, a victim of any offense under this article is a victim for all purposes of §14-2A-1 et seq. of this code: Provided, That for purposes of §14-2A-1(b) of this code, if otherwise qualified, a victim of any offense under this article may not be denied eligibility solely for the failure to report to law enforcement within the designated time frame. (e) Law Enforcement Notification. —If a law-enforcement officer encounters a child who reasonably appears to be a victim of an offense under this article, the officer shall notify the Department of Human Services. If available, the Department of Human Services may notify the Domestic Violence Program serving the area where the child is found. (f) Forfeiture; Debarment. — (1) The following are declared to be contraband and no person shall have a property interest in them: (A) All property which is directly or indirectly used or intended for use in any manner to facilitate a violation of this article; and (B) Any property constituting or derived from gross profits or other proceeds obtained from a violation of this article. (2) In any action under this section, the court may enter such restraining orders or take other appropriate action, including acceptance of performance bonds, in connection with any interest that is subject to forfeiture. (3) Forfeiture actions under this section shall use the procedure set forth in article §60A-7-1 et seq. of this code. (4) Any person or business entity convicted of a violation of this article shall be debarred from state or local government contracts. §61-14-8. Immunity for minor victim of sex trafficking. (a) In a prosecution or a juvenile proceeding for an offense of prostitution in violation of §61-8-5(b) of this code, a minor may not be held criminally liable if the court determines that the minor is a victim of an offense under this article: Provided, That subject to proof, a minor so charged shall be rebuttably presumed to be a victim under the provisions of this article. (b) This section does not apply in a prosecution or a juvenile proceeding for any of the other offenses under §61-8-5(b) of this code, including specifically soliciting, inducing, enticing, or procuring another to commit an act or offense of prostitution, unless it is determined by the court that the minor was coerced into the criminal behavior. (c) A minor who, under subsection (a) or (b) of this section, is not subject to criminal liability or adjudication as a juvenile delinquent is presumed to be an abused child as defined in §49-1-201 of this code and may be eligible for services under Chapter 49 of this code including, but not limited to, appropriate child welfare services including, but not limited to, comprehensive trauma-informed services that are specialized to the needs of child victims of sexual abuse and exploitation or child sex trafficking victims. §61-14-10. Exemption for medical, mental health, and legal services. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, this article does not apply to any person providing medical or mental health services to an illegal alien, or to any licensed attorney or their support staff who maintain an active attorney-client relationship with an illegal alien and are representing that person in either a criminal matter against the illegal alien or litigation concerning the illegal alien’s legal status under federal immigration or naturalization law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Chuck Horst

West Virginia House of Delegates, District 95 · R–WV

1 proposal
View proposals from Chuck Horst
West Virginia Legislature · HB 4106

Allowing constitutional carry for 18- to 20-year-olds

Apr 1, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 75

Chuck Horst · Sponsored / Eric Brooks · Co-sponsored / Mark Dean · Co-sponsored / Josh Holstein · Co-sponsored / Laura Kimble · Co-sponsored / Phil Mallow · Co-sponsored / Carl Martin · Co-sponsored / Ian T. Masters · Co-sponsored / Chris Phillips · Co-sponsored / Bill Ridenour · Co-sponsored / Bryan Ward · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 4106 extends concealed carry without a license to qualifying people age 18 and older and repeals the separate under-21 licensing offense. The reviewed provision requires U.S. citizenship or legal residency and retains state and federal firearm-possession disqualifications. It does not authorize possession by prohibited persons or establish an effect on firearm deaths.

Approved by the governor on 2026-04-01, Chapter 75. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Carry rules concern firearm access; active-shooter response concerns a narrower violence component. Neither demonstrates a change in the reported deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained West Virginia evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

§61-7-3. Carrying a deadly weapon without provisional license or other authorization by persons under twenty-one years of age; penalties. [Repealed.] […] (c) Any person may carry a concealed deadly weapon without a license therefor who is: (1) At least 18 years of age; (2) A United States citizen or legal resident thereof; (3) Not prohibited from possessing a firearm under the provisions of this section; and (4) Not prohibited from possessing a firearm under the provisions of 18 U. S. C. §922(g) or (n).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. James C. Justice

U.S. Senate, West Virginia · R–WV

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. James C. Justice
U.S. Congress · West Virginia delegation · S 4309

Deescalation Drone Pilot Program Act of 2026

Apr 15, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. James C. Justice · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 4309 proposes an FAA pilot program to review nonlethal drones for law-enforcement response to active-shooter events, with training and safety protocols, testing, a report and subsequent rulemaking. The proposal requires a program within two months of enactment, a report to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee within three months after the program ends, and initiation of rulemaking within 60 days after that report. Program aircraft must be manufactured in the United States under the referenced FTC standard. Its defined active-shooter event requires ongoing unlawful killing or attempted killing using the specified explosives or weapons, significant risk to life and a continuing threat absent immediate force. It reaffirms the existing prohibition on drones armed with dangerous weapons and defines the proposed nonlethal category. This pending proposal concerns response to a subset of firearm violence, not demonstrated effectiveness or all firearm deaths.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality series includes deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Carry rules concern firearm access; active-shooter response concerns a narrower violence component. Neither demonstrates a change in the reported deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained West Virginia evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Small unmanned aircraft pilot program for law enforcement and public safety(a)In generalChapter 448 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:44815.Small unmanned aircraft pilot program for law enforcement and public safety(a)Prohibition regarding weaponsThe prohibition regarding unmanned aircraft armed with dangerous weapons under section 363 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (49 U.S.C. 44802 note) is reaffirmed.(b)Pilot program(1)In generalNot later than 2 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall establish a deescalation drone pilot program to review the potential use of nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft by Federal, State, local, or Tribal law enforcement responding to an active shooter event.(2)ContentsThe pilot program required under paragraph (1) shall—(A)address the process of reviewing and validating nonlethal weapons that may be affixed to an unmanned aircraft;(B)address training protocols for law enforcement and agents of the Administration for the use of nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft;(C)address operational and safety protocols for operators of nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft and agencies directly overseeing the operation of such unmanned aircraft; and(D)assess the efficacy of nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft in indoor active shooter events and the safety benefits associated with increasing the safe engagement distance between a law enforcement officer and an active shooter.(3)PartnershipsIn carrying out the pilot program under this subsection, the Administrator shall use existing partnerships with the unmanned aircraft system test ranges designated under section 44803, in collaboration with Federal, State, and large metropolitan area law enforcement.(4)Interagency aviation agreementsThe Administrator may enter into interagency aviation agreements, as necessary, with the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and State large metropolitan and rural law enforcement agencies to support the pilot program under this subsection.(5)ConsultationThe Administrator shall solicit input from, and coordinate with, relevant stakeholders as appropriate in carrying out the pilot program established under this subsection.(6)ReportNot later than 3 months after the conclusion of the pilot program, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the results of the pilot program that includes a plan outlining a proposed process through which a law enforcement applicant to such program may seek permission from the Administrator to operate nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft.(c)RulemakingNot later than 60 days after submitting the report required under subsection (b)(6), the Administrator shall initiate a rulemaking to create a process through which the Administrator may provide approval—(1)for Federal, State, local, or Tribal law enforcement to operate nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft during an active shooter event; and(2)for manufacturers of nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft to operate such devices for testing, validation, and law enforcement demonstrations.(d)Manufacturing requirementAny nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft used under the pilot program shall be manufactured in the United States, as defined by the Federal Trade Commission under part 323 of title 16, Code of Federal Regulations.(e)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Active shooter eventThe term active shooter event means an event in which—(A)an individual is actively engaged in unlawfully killing or attempting to kill people using explosives as defined under chapter 40 of title 18, United States Code, or weapons subject to chapter 44 of title 18 or chapter 53 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;(B)responding to the event poses a significant risk to human life, including the lives of law enforcement personnel and other individuals; and(C)absent an immediate use of force, the individual described in subparagraph (A) would continue posing a threat to human life.(2)Nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraftThe term nonlethal deescalation unmanned aircraft means an unmanned aircraft operated by law enforcement that—(A)is only equipped or armed with 1 or more nonlethal weapons, including those that may be subject to the definition provided in section 930(g)(2) of title 18, United States Code; and(B)may be equipped with other nonlethal devices, including intense sound distraction emitters, cameras, targeting sensors, speakers, strobe lights, and other similar collateral equipment.(3)Nonlethal weaponThe term nonlethal weapon means a weapon, device, or munition that—(A)is explicitly designed and primarily employed to immediately incapacitate targeted individuals or property in the target area while minimizing—(i)fatalities;(ii)permanent injury to individuals; and(iii)undesired damage to property; and(B)is intended to have reversible effects on individuals and property..(b)Clerical amendmentThe analysis for chapter 448 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:‘44815. Small unmanned aircraft pilot program for law enforcement and public safety..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Vince Deeds

West Virginia Senate, District 10 · R–WV

1 proposal
View proposals from Vince Deeds
West Virginia Legislature · SB 137

Modifying parole eligibility for crime of second degree murder and voluntary manslaughter

Apr 1, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 98

Vince Deeds · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed SB 137 provisions set imprisonment at 15–60 years for second-degree murder and 5–25 years for voluntary manslaughter, with at least 15 or five years respectively before parole eligibility, or the longer applicable statutory minimum. This connection concerns those homicide penalties rather than every provision in the bill. It does not establish deterrence, reduced violence or a change in the earlier statistics.

Approved by the governor on 2026-04-01, Chapter 98. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

CDC homicide mortality uses resident death certificates and differs from police-reported offenses. Murder and voluntary-manslaughter penalties concern homicide policy without demonstrating prevention or a change in death counts. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained West Virginia evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

§61-2-3. Penalty for murder of second degree. Murder of the second degree shall be punished by a definite term of imprisonment in the penitentiary which is not less than 15 nor more than 60 years. A person imprisoned pursuant to the provisions of this section is not eligible for parole prior to having served a minimum of 15 years of his or her sentence or the minimum period required by the provisions of §62-12-13 of this code, whichever is greater.§61-2-4. Voluntary manslaughter; penalty. Voluntary manslaughter shall be punished by a definite term of imprisonment in the penitentiary which is not less than five nor more than 25 years. A person imprisoned pursuant to the provisions of this section is not eligible for parole prior to having served a minimum of five years of his or her sentence or the minimum period required by the provisions of §62-12-13 of this code, whichever is greater.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current West Virginia officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a West Virginia statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.