Compare West Virginia’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.
BLS does not publish a statewide West Virginia CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.
All-items price level89.52024 · #42 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.52024 · #24 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level54.22024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
West Virginia over time
Explore West Virginia readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. West Virginia officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a West Virginia effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a West Virginia change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
All-items price level West Virginia · source units
West VirginiaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
8 of 8 reviewed West Virginia actions match · 8 date markers shown. 34 major events shown separately.
West Virginia · 2024: 89.5 · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare West Virginia with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
West Virginia All-items price level · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
West Virginia · state comparison
How does West Virginia’s cost of living compare?
The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.
West Virginia · 202489.5
West Virginia rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
All-items price level
BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.
Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare West Virginia with the published U.S. category value shown.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
West Virginia
2024 · West Virginia: 89.5 · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
West Virginia All-items price level history
Period
West Virginia
Compare
2014
89.9
2015
90.6
2016
89.8
2017
89
2018
89.4
2019
88.5
2020
87.3
2021
91
2022
89.2
2023
89.6
2024
89.5
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 89.52024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
110.7
—
#2
Hawaii
110
—
#3
New Jersey
108.8
—
#4
New York
107.9
—
#5
Washington
107
—
#6
Massachusetts
105.8
—
#7
Maryland
105
—
#8
New Hampshire
104.2
—
#9
Connecticut
103.6
—
#10
Florida
103.4
—
#11
Oregon
103.4
—
#12
Colorado
103.1
—
#13
Alaska
102.4
—
#14
Rhode Island
102.3
—
#15
Virginia
101.1
—
#16
Arizona
100.7
—
#17
Nevada
100
—
#18
Illinois
100
—
#19
Delaware
99.8
—
#20
Utah
98.9
—
#21
Minnesota
98.6
—
#22
Vermont
98
—
#23
Pennsylvania
97.6
—
#24
Texas
97.1
—
#25
Maine
97.1
—
#26
Georgia
96.3
—
#27
Michigan
96.2
—
#28
Idaho
95.5
—
#29
Montana
94.6
—
#30
North Carolina
94.3
—
#31
Wisconsin
94.1
—
#32
South Carolina
93.7
—
#33
Indiana
93.3
—
#34
Ohio
92.8
—
#35
Wyoming
92.7
—
#36
New Mexico
92.2
—
#37
Tennessee
91.9
—
#38
Missouri
90.8
—
#39
Kentucky
90.2
—
#40
Nebraska
90.1
—
#41
Kansas
90.1
—
#42
West Virginia · your comparison
89.5
—
#43
North Dakota
89
—
#44
Alabama
88.8
—
#45
South Dakota
88.6
—
#46
Louisiana
88.2
—
#47
Oklahoma
87.8
—
#48
Iowa
87.8
—
#49
Mississippi
87
—
#50
Arkansas
86.9
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.
West Virginia · 20242.5%
West Virginia rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Annual change in regional price deflator
Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.
An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
West Virginia
2024 · West Virginia: 2.5% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
West Virginia Annual change in regional price deflator history
Period
West Virginia
Compare
2015
1%
2016
0.2%
2017
0.8%
2018
2.6%
2019
0.4%
2020
-0.2%
2021
8.5%
2022
4.4%
2023
4.4%
2024
2.5%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · 2.5%2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Montana
6.7%
—
#2
Idaho
6.2%
—
#3
Utah
6%
—
#4
Nevada
4.8%
—
#5
Michigan
4.7%
—
#6
New Mexico
4%
—
#7
Indiana
4%
—
#8
Wyoming
3.9%
—
#9
Illinois
3.9%
—
#10
Colorado
3.8%
—
#11
Delaware
3.7%
—
#12
Ohio
3.6%
—
#13
Wisconsin
3.6%
—
#14
North Dakota
3.5%
—
#15
Vermont
3.5%
—
#16
South Dakota
3.1%
—
#17
Maryland
3%
—
#18
Minnesota
3%
—
#19
Kentucky
2.9%
—
#20
South Carolina
2.9%
—
#21
Hawaii
2.9%
—
#22
Rhode Island
2.8%
—
#23
Mississippi
2.8%
—
#24
Kansas
2.8%
—
#25
Pennsylvania
2.8%
—
#26
Arkansas
2.8%
—
#27
New York
2.7%
—
#28
Arizona
2.6%
—
#29
North Carolina
2.5%
—
#30
Texas
2.5%
—
#31
New Jersey
2.5%
—
#32
West Virginia · your comparison
2.5%
—
#33
Nebraska
2.4%
—
#34
Georgia
2.4%
—
#35
Florida
2.4%
—
#36
Virginia
2.4%
—
#37
Tennessee
2.4%
—
#38
Alabama
2.3%
—
#39
Missouri
2.3%
—
#40
Louisiana
2%
—
#41
Connecticut
2%
—
#42
Alaska
1.7%
—
#43
Maine
1.7%
—
#44
Oklahoma
1.6%
—
#45
Iowa
1.5%
—
#46
New Hampshire
1.4%
—
#47
Washington
1.3%
—
#48
California
1.3%
—
#49
Oregon
1.2%
—
#50
Massachusetts
0.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.
West Virginia · 2024$50,051
West Virginia rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Real personal income per person
Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.
Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
West Virginia
2024 · West Virginia: $50,051 · Rank #49 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
West Virginia Real personal income per person history
Period
West Virginia
Compare
2014
$41,580
2015
$42,140
2016
$42,095
2017
$43,761
2018
$45,029
2019
$46,597
2020
$49,252
2021
$49,425
2022
$48,517
2023
$49,071
2024
$50,051
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. West Virginia stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. West Virginia has a dark outline.
Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
West Virginia · $50,0512024 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare West Virginia with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Wyoming
$75,501
—
#2
Connecticut
$74,254
—
#3
Massachusetts
$71,629
—
#4
South Dakota
$69,153
—
#5
Nebraska
$65,297
—
#6
North Dakota
$65,271
—
#7
Colorado
$65,223
—
#8
New Hampshire
$64,632
—
#9
Washington
$64,421
—
#10
New York
$64,153
—
#11
New Jersey
$63,142
—
#12
California
$63,028
—
#13
Minnesota
$62,039
—
#14
Virginia
$61,914
—
#15
Maryland
$61,111
—
#16
Illinois
$60,333
—
#17
Alaska
$60,272
—
#18
Iowa
$60,144
—
#19
Montana
$59,203
—
#20
Kansas
$59,172
—
#21
Vermont
$58,893
—
#22
Oklahoma
$58,692
—
#23
Pennsylvania
$58,620
—
#24
Tennessee
$58,582
—
#25
Wisconsin
$58,273
—
#26
Texas
$58,219
—
#27
Missouri
$57,850
—
#28
Maine
$57,480
—
#29
Florida
$57,131
—
#30
Louisiana
$56,789
—
#31
Nevada
$56,503
—
#32
North Carolina
$56,310
—
#33
Ohio
$56,232
—
#34
Rhode Island
$55,878
—
#35
Indiana
$55,562
—
#36
Oregon
$55,451
—
#37
Arkansas
$55,219
—
#38
Delaware
$55,185
—
#39
Utah
$55,116
—
#40
Michigan
$53,569
—
#41
Georgia
$52,952
—
#42
Arizona
$52,890
—
#43
Idaho
$52,816
—
#44
South Carolina
$52,463
—
#45
Kentucky
$52,290
—
#46
Hawaii
$52,272
—
#47
Alabama
$52,216
—
#48
New Mexico
$51,121
—
#49
West Virginia · your comparison
$50,051
—
#50
Mississippi
$48,465
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
8 of 8 reviewed West Virginia actions · newest first
Jan 28, 2026 · HB 4885 · To remove the state tax on gasoline at the pumps · Not enactedWest Virginia Legislature · HB 4885
To remove the state tax on gasoline at the pumps
Jan 28, 2026 · Not enacted
Jordan Bridges · Sponsored / Carl "Bill" Roop · Co-sponsored / Adam Vance · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 4885 proposed repealing §11-14C-5, the motor-fuel excise-tax levy and rate section. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session. The proposal concerns West Virginia’s tax component of pump prices, not repeal of taxes in the other five Lower Atlantic states or a demonstrated regional price reduction.
To House Finance. The 2026 regular session ended without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not the adjournment date.
Why this record is included
The fact is the tax-inclusive Lower Atlantic regular-gasoline average for Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. A West Virginia tax repeal proposal concerns one state and one component of the regional price. It establishes no pump-price effect. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A BILL to repeal §11-14C-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to motor fuel excise tax; and removing taxes on gasoline. Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia: ARTICLE 14C. MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAX. §11-14C-5. Taxes levied; rate. [Repealed.]
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 22, 2026 · SB 577 · Relating to electric and natural gas utility rate increases · Not enactedWest Virginia Legislature · SB 577
Relating to electric and natural gas utility rate increases
Jan 22, 2026 · Not enacted
Joey Garcia · Sponsored / Mike Woelfel · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 577 proposed a one-year freeze on electric and natural-gas utility rate increases under the Public Service Commission, including pending cases and approved increases not yet effective. It allowed minimum necessary emergency increases for safe service or extreme financial hardship attributable solely to the freeze, and required an interim study. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session; the electricity connection does not imply rates were frozen.
To Energy, Industry, and Mining. The 2026 regular session ended without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not the adjournment date.
Why this record is included
The fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across customer sectors. The electric-rate portion of the proposal concerns prices; natural gas charges are outside the measure. A proposed freeze does not establish actual prices. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) One-year moratorium. – Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, for a period of one year following the effective date of this section, the commission shall authorize no increase of rates charged by any electric or gas utility subject to its jurisdiction to any customer of any class, and shall, for the same one-year period, suspend and hold in abeyance cases for electric and gas rate increases which are pending before the commission on said effective date. The one-year moratorium on rate increases mandated by this section applies to any electric or gas utility rate increase, including, but not limited to: (1) Any general rate increase application filed pursuant to §24-2-1 et seq. of this code; (2) Any automatic adjustment mechanism or other rate adjustment authorized by this code or by commission order which would result in an increase in rates or other charges to utility customers during the pendency of the one-year moratorium; and (3) Any previously approved electric or gas utility rate increase that has not yet taken effect as of the effective date of this section. (c) Exceptions. – During the one-year moratorium on rate increases mandated by this section, the commission may, upon petition by an electric or natural gas utility, authorize an emergency rate increase otherwise subject to the moratorium if it is determined that such emergency rate is necessary to: (1) Ensure the continued provision of safe and adequate electric or gas service to the utility’s customers; or (2) Protect the utility from extreme financial hardship if such financial hardship is attributable solely to the moratorium on rate increases. Any emergency rate increase authorized pursuant to this subsection shall by limited to the minimum amount necessary to address the reason requiring the rate increase. The commission shall promulgate rules setting forth criteria for determination of the continued provision of safe and adequate utility service and of a utility’s extreme financial hardship within the meaning of this section. (d) Interim study. – During the one-year moratorium mandated by this section, the Joint Committee on Government and Finance shall cause a legislative interim study or studies to be conducted on utility management, rate design, and the causes of and potential legislative remedies for recent dramatic electric and natural gas utility rate increases shouldered by ratepayers in the state.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 25, 2025 · SB 856 · Insurance reporting and oversight changes · Governor approval · SignedGovernor · SB 856
Insurance reporting and oversight changes
Apr 25, 2025 · Governor approval · Signed
Patrick Morrisey · Signed · historical officeholder
Reviewed enacted law and governor approval
Governor Patrick Morrisey approved SB856 on April 25, 2025. It repeals five insurance-reporting sections and changes workplace-safety, first-responder PTSD, flood-notice and state-worker program duties. The annual flood notice remains required on the agency website. Passage, approval and July 11 effectiveness are separate milestones. This dated law changes reporting and oversight duties. Full signed SB856 and all five former repealed bodies were reviewed, alongside marked former clauses and final amended text. Full amendment/incorporated-authority chains, individual historical legislative identities, amendment disposition, implementation and measured outcomes remain unverified.
Review selected law provisions (1 statutory provision)
These describe the original enacted law provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Section 33-20-19: Repeals the first-quarter annual publication comparing current minimum automobile-liability premiums for every licensed insurer offering the required coverage, and public distribution through sheriff tax divisions and libraries in all 55 counties. This removes a price-comparison duty; it does not itself repeal every automobile-rate rule or establish lower premiums or a change in CPI.
Approved 2025-04-25. This dated law changes reporting and oversight duties. Full signed SB856 and all five former repealed bodies were reviewed, alongside marked former clauses and final amended text. Full amendment/incorporated-authority chains, individual historical legislative identities, amendment disposition, implementation and measured outcomes remain unverified.
Why this record is included
Consumer automobile-insurance price-comparison information; no measured inflation or premium effect established.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Patrick Morrisey approved SB856 on April 25, 2025. It repeals five insurance-reporting sections and changes workplace-safety, first-responder PTSD, flood-notice and state-worker program duties. The annual flood notice remains required on the agency website. Passage, approval and July 11 effectiveness are separate milestones.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 12, 2025 · SB 856 · Insurance reporting and oversight changes · Enacted · Chapter 131West Virginia Legislature · SB 856
Insurance reporting and oversight changes
Apr 12, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 131
Patricia Puertas Rucker · Sponsored
Reviewed enacted law and legislative sponsorship
Patricia Puertas Rucker was the recorded lead sponsor. Senate passage vote201on March27recorded32–0with2absent; House passage vote566on April12recorded91–0with9absent. The House journal also records Gary G. Howell saying he was absent and would have voted yes, although the roll-call sheet lists him under yeas. That individual conflict is unresolved; a stated intention is not treated as a cast vote. Governor approval was April25and effectiveness July11. Chris Phillips’s proposed floor amendment has an unverified disposition; neighboring rejected or withdrawn amendments in the journal concern SB299. Governor Patrick Morrisey approved SB856 on April 25, 2025. It repeals five insurance-reporting sections and changes workplace-safety, first-responder PTSD, flood-notice and state-worker program duties. The annual flood notice remains required on the agency website. Passage, approval and July 11 effectiveness are separate milestones. These are dated enacted-law and sponsorship records. Passage, approval and effectiveness are separate milestones. Full amendment and incorporated-authority chains, current implementation, delivered benefits and measured outcomes remain unverified.
Review selected law provisions (1 statutory provision)
These describe the original enacted law provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Section 33-20-19: Repeals the first-quarter annual publication comparing current minimum automobile-liability premiums for every licensed insurer offering the required coverage, and public distribution through sheriff tax divisions and libraries in all 55 counties. This removes a price-comparison duty; it does not itself repeal every automobile-rate rule or establish lower premiums or a change in CPI.
Patricia Puertas Rucker was the recorded lead sponsor. Senate passage vote201on March27recorded32–0with2absent; House passage vote566on April12recorded91–0with9absent. The House journal also records Gary G. Howell saying he was absent and would have voted yes, although the roll-call sheet lists him under yeas. That individual conflict is unresolved; a stated intention is not treated as a cast vote. Governor approval was April25and effectiveness July11. Chris Phillips’s proposed floor amendment has an unverified disposition; neighboring rejected or withdrawn amendments in the journal concern SB299. These are dated enacted-law and sponsorship records. Passage, approval and effectiveness are separate milestones. Full amendment and incorporated-authority chains, current implementation, delivered benefits and measured outcomes remain unverified.
Why this record is included
Consumer automobile-insurance price-comparison information; no measured inflation or premium effect established.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Patrick Morrisey approved SB856 on April 25, 2025. It repeals five insurance-reporting sections and changes workplace-safety, first-responder PTSD, flood-notice and state-worker program duties. The annual flood notice remains required on the agency website. Passage, approval and July 11 effectiveness are separate milestones.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 27, 2016 · SOS archive document 53215 · End the winter-storm emergency in 51 counties · Historical proclamation issuedGovernor · SOS archive document 53215
End the winter-storm emergency in 51 counties
Jan 27, 2016 · Historical proclamation issued
Earl Ray Tomblin · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical governor emergency action
The governor names Winter Storm Jonas and reports a shift to recovery except in four counties. Terminate the January 22 emergency in 51 counties, retaining it in Berkeley, Jefferson, Morgan and Preston. Continue the four-county emergency until 5 p.m. January 29 unless extended by subsequent proclamation. The signed proclamation is dated 2016-01-27. The scheduled end is 2016-01-29T17:00:00; its conditional language does not prove no later instrument was issued. The conditional January 29 end does not establish that there was no later extension. No current consumer-price-law status or CPI effect is established. This is a historical governor action. Current law, actual spending and implementation have not been independently verified; the record does not establish that it caused a change in a chart series.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision 1: Terminate the January 22 emergency in 51 counties, retaining it in Berkeley, Jefferson, Morgan and Preston.
Reviewed provision 2: Continue the four-county emergency until 5 p.m. January 29 unless extended by subsequent proclamation.
Historical proclamation issued on 2016-01-27. The signed proclamation is dated 2016-01-27. The scheduled end is 2016-01-29T17:00:00; its conditional language does not prove no later instrument was issued.
Why this record is included
Changes geography of the emergency whose original explicitly invoked consumer-price protection.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · energy · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The governor names Winter Storm Jonas and reports a shift to recovery except in four counties. Terminate the January 22 emergency in 51 counties, retaining it in Berkeley, Jefferson, Morgan and Preston. Continue the four-county emergency until 5 p.m. January 29 unless extended by subsequent proclamation.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 22, 2016 · SOS archive document 53209 · Replace winter-storm preparedness with a statewide emergency · Historical proclamation issuedGovernor · SOS archive document 53209
Replace winter-storm preparedness with a statewide emergency
Jan 22, 2016 · Historical proclamation issued
Earl Ray Tomblin · Issued · historical officeholder
Reviewed historical governor emergency action
State resources shift from preparation to responding to the winter-storm emergency. Declare an emergency in all 55 counties for 30 days unless terminated by a subsequent proclamation. Terminate and supersede January 20 preparedness while retaining the emergency powers invoked under it for the emergency’s duration. Require sales of food, essential consumer items, emergency supplies and home heating oil to comply with section 46A-6J-3. The signed proclamation is dated 2016-01-22. No measured CPI effect or new numerical price cap is established. January 27 narrowed this emergency; it is not a current statewide declaration. This is a historical governor action. Current law, actual spending and implementation have not been independently verified; the record does not establish that it caused a change in a chart series.
These describe the original executive instrument provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Reviewed provision 1: Declare an emergency in all 55 counties for 30 days unless terminated by a subsequent proclamation.
Reviewed provision 2: Terminate and supersede January 20 preparedness while retaining the emergency powers invoked under it for the emergency’s duration.
Reviewed provision 3: Require sales of food, essential consumer items, emergency supplies and home heating oil to comply with section 46A-6J-3.
Historical proclamation issued on 2016-01-22. The signed proclamation is dated 2016-01-22.
Why this record is included
Explicit emergency consumer-price-law compliance.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · energy · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
State resources shift from preparation to responding to the winter-storm emergency. Declare an emergency in all 55 counties for 30 days unless terminated by a subsequent proclamation. Terminate and supersede January 20 preparedness while retaining the emergency powers invoked under it for the emergency’s duration. Require sales of food, essential consumer items, emergency supplies and home heating oil to comply with section 46A-6J-3.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified West Virginia officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s West Virginia candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
2 statements from 2 candidates
2026 West Virginia U.S. Senate — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements
The American tax and resource burden must be fairly and equitably distributed among our economy's beneficiaries and participants: individual, corporate and non-profit whatever the income stream. No one should be able to live like a king on the money they borrow, while their employees struggle to sur…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and government spending
Candidate campaign source
The American tax and resource burden must be fairly and equitably distributed among our economy's beneficiaries and participants: individual, corporate and non-profit whatever the income stream. No one should be able to live like a king on the money they borrow, while their employees struggle to survive and raise their families on the money they earn. I support the elimination of the "Buy, Borrow, Die" tax loop-hole, the increase of the marginal tax rate of earners of over $500,000.00 per year and other changes to the tax code that permit those who work and worked to sustain their dignity on their savings and earnings when retired, facing hardship or facing inflation that minimizes the value of their resources.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Aug 21, 2026
West Virginia families are being crushed by inflation, runaway energy costs, and a federal government that punishes producers and rewards dependence. Marshall will fight to unleash West Virginia's energy economy, cut regulations that strangle small businesses, and put hard-working Mountain State fam…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Where Marshall Stands
Candidate campaign source
West Virginia families are being crushed by inflation, runaway energy costs, and a federal government that punishes producers and rewards dependence. Marshall will fight to unleash West Virginia's energy economy, cut regulations that strangle small businesses, and put hard-working Mountain State families first.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published West Virginia candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
West Virginia incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current West Virginia legislators and West Virginia’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from West Virginia’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 West Virginia incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Joey Garcia
West Virginia Senate, District 13 · D–WV
1 proposalView proposals from Joey GarciaWest Virginia Legislature · SB 577
Relating to electric and natural gas utility rate increases
Jan 22, 2026 · Not enacted
Joey Garcia · Sponsored / Mike Woelfel · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 577 proposed a one-year freeze on electric and natural-gas utility rate increases under the Public Service Commission, including pending cases and approved increases not yet effective. It allowed minimum necessary emergency increases for safe service or extreme financial hardship attributable solely to the freeze, and required an interim study. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session; the electricity connection does not imply rates were frozen.
To Energy, Industry, and Mining. The 2026 regular session ended without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not the adjournment date.
Why this record is included
The fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across customer sectors. The electric-rate portion of the proposal concerns prices; natural gas charges are outside the measure. A proposed freeze does not establish actual prices. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(b) One-year moratorium. – Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, for a period of one year following the effective date of this section, the commission shall authorize no increase of rates charged by any electric or gas utility subject to its jurisdiction to any customer of any class, and shall, for the same one-year period, suspend and hold in abeyance cases for electric and gas rate increases which are pending before the commission on said effective date. The one-year moratorium on rate increases mandated by this section applies to any electric or gas utility rate increase, including, but not limited to: (1) Any general rate increase application filed pursuant to §24-2-1 et seq. of this code; (2) Any automatic adjustment mechanism or other rate adjustment authorized by this code or by commission order which would result in an increase in rates or other charges to utility customers during the pendency of the one-year moratorium; and (3) Any previously approved electric or gas utility rate increase that has not yet taken effect as of the effective date of this section. (c) Exceptions. – During the one-year moratorium on rate increases mandated by this section, the commission may, upon petition by an electric or natural gas utility, authorize an emergency rate increase otherwise subject to the moratorium if it is determined that such emergency rate is necessary to: (1) Ensure the continued provision of safe and adequate electric or gas service to the utility’s customers; or (2) Protect the utility from extreme financial hardship if such financial hardship is attributable solely to the moratorium on rate increases. Any emergency rate increase authorized pursuant to this subsection shall by limited to the minimum amount necessary to address the reason requiring the rate increase. The commission shall promulgate rules setting forth criteria for determination of the continued provision of safe and adequate utility service and of a utility’s extreme financial hardship within the meaning of this section. (d) Interim study. – During the one-year moratorium mandated by this section, the Joint Committee on Government and Finance shall cause a legislative interim study or studies to be conducted on utility management, rate design, and the causes of and potential legislative remedies for recent dramatic electric and natural gas utility rate increases shouldered by ratepayers in the state.
West Virginia House of Delegates, District 33 · R–WV
1 proposalView proposals from Jordan BridgesWest Virginia Legislature · HB 4885
To remove the state tax on gasoline at the pumps
Jan 28, 2026 · Not enacted
Jordan Bridges · Sponsored / Carl "Bill" Roop · Co-sponsored / Adam Vance · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 4885 proposed repealing §11-14C-5, the motor-fuel excise-tax levy and rate section. It did not become law in the 2026 regular session. The proposal concerns West Virginia’s tax component of pump prices, not repeal of taxes in the other five Lower Atlantic states or a demonstrated regional price reduction.
To House Finance. The 2026 regular session ended without this bill becoming law. The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not the adjournment date.
Why this record is included
The fact is the tax-inclusive Lower Atlantic regular-gasoline average for Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. A West Virginia tax repeal proposal concerns one state and one component of the regional price. It establishes no pump-price effect. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A BILL to repeal §11-14C-5 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to motor fuel excise tax; and removing taxes on gasoline. Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia: ARTICLE 14C. MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAX. §11-14C-5. Taxes levied; rate. [Repealed.]
1 proposalView proposals from Patricia Puertas RuckerWest Virginia Legislature · SB 856
Insurance reporting and oversight changes
Apr 12, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 131
Patricia Puertas Rucker · Sponsored
Reviewed enacted law and legislative sponsorship
Patricia Puertas Rucker was the recorded lead sponsor. Senate passage vote201on March27recorded32–0with2absent; House passage vote566on April12recorded91–0with9absent. The House journal also records Gary G. Howell saying he was absent and would have voted yes, although the roll-call sheet lists him under yeas. That individual conflict is unresolved; a stated intention is not treated as a cast vote. Governor approval was April25and effectiveness July11. Chris Phillips’s proposed floor amendment has an unverified disposition; neighboring rejected or withdrawn amendments in the journal concern SB299. Governor Patrick Morrisey approved SB856 on April 25, 2025. It repeals five insurance-reporting sections and changes workplace-safety, first-responder PTSD, flood-notice and state-worker program duties. The annual flood notice remains required on the agency website. Passage, approval and July 11 effectiveness are separate milestones. These are dated enacted-law and sponsorship records. Passage, approval and effectiveness are separate milestones. Full amendment and incorporated-authority chains, current implementation, delivered benefits and measured outcomes remain unverified.
Review selected law provisions (1 statutory provision)
These describe the original enacted law provisions selected for this topic. Later amendments and current implementation require separate evidence.
Section 33-20-19: Repeals the first-quarter annual publication comparing current minimum automobile-liability premiums for every licensed insurer offering the required coverage, and public distribution through sheriff tax divisions and libraries in all 55 counties. This removes a price-comparison duty; it does not itself repeal every automobile-rate rule or establish lower premiums or a change in CPI.
Patricia Puertas Rucker was the recorded lead sponsor. Senate passage vote201on March27recorded32–0with2absent; House passage vote566on April12recorded91–0with9absent. The House journal also records Gary G. Howell saying he was absent and would have voted yes, although the roll-call sheet lists him under yeas. That individual conflict is unresolved; a stated intention is not treated as a cast vote. Governor approval was April25and effectiveness July11. Chris Phillips’s proposed floor amendment has an unverified disposition; neighboring rejected or withdrawn amendments in the journal concern SB299. These are dated enacted-law and sponsorship records. Passage, approval and effectiveness are separate milestones. Full amendment and incorporated-authority chains, current implementation, delivered benefits and measured outcomes remain unverified.
Why this record is included
Consumer automobile-insurance price-comparison information; no measured inflation or premium effect established.
Retained West Virginia evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context · unemployment-rate · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Governor Patrick Morrisey approved SB856 on April 25, 2025. It repeals five insurance-reporting sections and changes workplace-safety, first-responder PTSD, flood-notice and state-worker program duties. The annual flood notice remains required on the agency website. Passage, approval and July 11 effectiveness are separate milestones.
Only current West Virginia officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a West Virginia statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 7, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
West Virginia snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to West Virginia, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.