Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price12.42¢/kWh2024 · #42 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.893/gal2026-08 · #26 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$143.322024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Tennessee over time
Explore Tennessee readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Tennessee officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Tennessee effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Tennessee change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Tennessee · source units
TennesseePublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
8 of 8 reviewed Tennessee actions match · 8 date markers shown. 49 major events shown separately.
Tennessee · 2024: 12.42¢/kWh · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Tennessee, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Tennessee Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Tennessee · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Tennessee · 202412.42¢/kWh
Tennessee rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Tennessee, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Tennessee
2024 · Tennessee: 12.42¢/kWh · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Tennessee Residential electricity price history
Period
Tennessee
Compare
2015
10.3¢/kWh
2016
10.41¢/kWh
2017
10.72¢/kWh
2018
10.71¢/kWh
2019
10.87¢/kWh
2020
10.76¢/kWh
2021
11.07¢/kWh
2022
12.25¢/kWh
2023
12.19¢/kWh
2024
12.42¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Tennessee · 12.42¢/kWh2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee · your comparison
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations, including taxes, in EIA's Midwest petroleum district. The district includes Tennessee and 14 other states.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.934/gal
Weekly change
−$0.087/gal
One year earlier
$3.088/gal
Change from one year earlier
+$0.759/gal
Method and limitations
U.S. Energy Information Administration weekly retail motor-gasoline survey estimate for the Midwest region. FactVote displays the published dollars-per-gallon value and calculates changes from EIA's published prior-week and nearest year-earlier weekly observations.
EIA does not publish a current Tennessee statewide weekly gasoline-price series; this Midwest regional estimate should not be read as Tennessee's statewide average.
The regional estimate combines Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Tennessee community.
This nominal weekly snapshot does not identify why prices changed or establish the effect of any tax, bill, executive action, or market event.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Tennessee · 2024$143.32
Tennessee rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Tennessee
2024 · Tennessee: $143.32 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Tennessee Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Tennessee
Compare
2010
$128.58
2011
$132.26
2012
$122.98
2013
$124.25
2014
$132.76
2015
$128.51
2016
$128.89
2017
$123.3
2018
$137.35
2019
$132.33
2020
$125.7
2021
$130.98
2022
$145.49
2023
$135.22
2024
$143.32
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Tennessee · $143.322024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee · your comparison
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Tennessee · 202476.3 TWh
Tennessee rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Tennessee, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Tennessee
2024 · Tennessee: 76.3 TWh · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Tennessee Total electricity generation history
Period
Tennessee
Compare
2015
75.2 TWh
2016
79.3 TWh
2017
79 TWh
2018
81.6 TWh
2019
82.3 TWh
2020
80.6 TWh
2021
79.1 TWh
2022
78 TWh
2023
77.8 TWh
2024
76.3 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Tennessee · 76.3 TWh2024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee · your comparison
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Tennessee's in-state electric-power-industry net generation supplied by nuclear power.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Source calculation
Nuclear net generation
32,185,960 MWh
Total in-state net generation
76,166,766 MWh
Method and limitations
FactVote divided EIA's 32,185,960 MWh of 2024 nuclear net generation by 76,166,766 MWh of total in-state net generation and rounded the result to one decimal place.
The headline is calculated from final annual EIA generation data and rounded to one decimal place.
In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in Tennessee because power crosses state lines.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Tennessee · 2024289.3 min/year
Tennessee rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Tennessee
2024 · Tennessee: 289.3 min/year · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Tennessee Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Tennessee
Compare
2023
926.9 min/year
2024
289.3 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Tennessee · 289.3 min/year2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee · your comparison
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Tennessee · 2024492 trillion Btu
Tennessee rank#13among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Tennessee · 492 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #13 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee · your comparison
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Tennessee · 202490.46 Mt CO₂
Tennessee rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Tennessee · 90.46 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee · your comparison
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
8 of 8 reviewed Tennessee actions · newest first
Sep 4, 2026 · Current Tennessee gasoline taxes and fees · Tennessee motor-fuel tax rates · Current rates in effectTennessee agencies · Current Tennessee gasoline taxes and fees
Tennessee motor-fuel tax rates
Sep 4, 2026 · Current rates in effect
Commissioner David Gerregano · Acted
FactVote reviewed summary
Tennessee Revenue administers 27.4 cents per gallon in state gasoline taxes and petroleum fees.
Revenue's current guidance lists the 26-cent gasoline tax plus the 1-cent special tax and 0.4-cent environmental assurance fee.
Why this record is included
Tennessee Revenue lists a 26-cent gasoline tax, a 1-cent special petroleum tax, and a 0.4-cent environmental assurance fee, totaling 27.4 cents per gallon. These are direct Tennessee components of tax-inclusive pump prices, but they do not set wholesale, distribution, or retail margins and do not govern the full 15-state EIA regional average.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official rate page lists gasoline at $0.26 per gallon, the special petroleum tax at $0.01, and the environmental assurance fee at $0.004.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 14, 2026 · H.R.9613 · Nuclear Advisory Committee Reform Act · Committee actionU.S. Congress · Tennessee delegation · H.R.9613
Nuclear Advisory Committee Reform Act
Jul 14, 2026 · Committee action
Rep. Diana Harshbarger · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
update the role of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards in the licensing and oversight of nuclear reactor facilities, and for other purposes
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses nuclear-power generation, reactor deployment, or the fuel and regulatory systems used to produce nuclear electricity. It does not establish an effect on Tennessee's nuclear generation share.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
update the role of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards in the licensing and oversight of nuclear reactor facilities, and for other purposes
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 23, 2026 · H.R.9022 · Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027 · Committee actionU.S. Congress · Tennessee delegation · H.R.9022
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027
Jun 23, 2026 · Committee action
Rep. Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The FY2027 Energy and Water appropriations bill includes funding for DOE Nuclear Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission within a broader federal spending measure.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1377 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1181, H.R. 9022, H.R. 8595 and H.R. 9237. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1181 and H.R. 9237 under a closed rule and H.R. 9022 and H.R. 8595 under a structured rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
Why this record is included
The federal appropriation includes Department of Energy Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission funding. Those programs concern civilian reactor development and oversight; the bill neither sets Tennessee’s nuclear share nor establishes an effect on the 2024 value.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027 This bill provides FY2027 appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Energy (DOE), and several independent agencies. The bill provides appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including for Investigations, Construction, Mississippi River and Tributaries, Operation and Maintenance, the Regulatory Program, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, Expenses, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, and the Water…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Sep 10, 2025 · H.R.4553 · Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 · Passed the HouseU.S. Congress · Tennessee delegation · H.R.4553
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026
Sep 10, 2025 · Passed the House
Rep. Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The FY2026 Energy and Water appropriations bill includes funding for DOE Nuclear Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission within a broader federal spending measure.
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 156.
Why this record is included
The federal appropriation includes Department of Energy Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission funding. Those programs concern civilian reactor development and oversight; the bill neither sets Tennessee’s nuclear share nor establishes an effect on the 2024 value.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 This bill provides FY2026 appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Energy (DOE), and several independent agencies. The bill provides appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including for Investigations, Construction, Mississippi River and Tributaries, Operation and Maintenance, the Regulatory Program, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, Expenses, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, and the Water…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 27, 2025 · SB 885 · As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment. · Companion enacted · Public Chapter 517Tennessee Legislature · SB 885
As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
May 27, 2025 · Companion enacted · Public Chapter 517
Sen. Shane Reeves · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Taxes - As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
HB 1133 became Public Chapter 517; SB 885 was substituted rather than separately enacted. The official companion-chapter entry is dated 2025-05-27.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses nuclear-power generation, reactor deployment, or the fuel and regulatory systems used to produce nuclear electricity. It does not establish an effect on Tennessee's nuclear generation share.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Taxes - As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 27, 2025 · HB 1133 · As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment. · EnactedTennessee Legislature · HB 1133
As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
May 27, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. Clark Boyd · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Taxes - As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
The official Tennessee General Assembly record shows the measure was enacted by May 27, 2025.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses nuclear-power generation, reactor deployment, or the fuel and regulatory systems used to produce nuclear electricity. It does not establish an effect on Tennessee's nuclear generation share.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Taxes - As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Tennessee officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Tennessee candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
21 statements from 13 candidates
2026 Tennessee Governor — General Election
4 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements
Tennessee has 62 data centers operating and 16 more proposed. Under current law, a company qualifies for a major sales-tax exemption by investing $100 million and creating 15 permanent jobs — roughly $6.7 million in capital per required job. It then buys electricity at a 1.5% tax rate and negotiates…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Proven in practice.
Candidate campaign source
Tennessee has 62 data centers operating and 16 more proposed. Under current law, a company qualifies for a major sales-tax exemption by investing $100 million and creating 15 permanent jobs — roughly $6.7 million in capital per required job. It then buys electricity at a 1.5% tax rate and negotiates a county PILOT that can hold down its property taxes for twenty years.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Tennesseans should be able to afford their lives through honest work. Government should focus on lowering everyday costs for families while making sure the companies profiting most from Tennessee's growth pay their share toward the roads, schools, and power grid – infrastructure that benefits everyo…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lower the Cost of Living for Working Families
Candidate campaign source
Tennesseans should be able to afford their lives through honest work. Government should focus on lowering everyday costs for families while making sure the companies profiting most from Tennessee's growth pay their share toward the roads, schools, and power grid – infrastructure that benefits everyone.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Many Tennessee communities face unnecessary restrictions that prevent responsible renewable energy projects from being developed. Lauren will work with local governments and utilities to review outdated regulations and remove red tape that blocks affordable energy solutions while still respecting lo…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, water, technology, and environment
Candidate campaign source
Many Tennessee communities face unnecessary restrictions that prevent responsible renewable energy projects from being developed. Lauren will work with local governments and utilities to review outdated regulations and remove red tape that blocks affordable energy solutions while still respecting local land-use decisions.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Bring down your utility bill Modernize the grid, expand nuclear and renewable capacity, protect TVA from privatization, and clear the red tape blocking affordable energy projects.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lower the Cost of Living for Working Families
Candidate campaign source
Bring down your utility bill Modernize the grid, expand nuclear and renewable capacity, protect TVA from privatization, and clear the red tape blocking affordable energy projects.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Too many Tennessee families spend a large share of their income on utility bills. Lauren will prioritize policies that expand access to lower-cost energy sources, modernize the power grid, and encourage competition and innovation that bring down electricity costs for working households.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, water, technology, and environment
Candidate campaign source
Too many Tennessee families spend a large share of their income on utility bills. Lauren will prioritize policies that expand access to lower-cost energy sources, modernize the power grid, and encourage competition and innovation that bring down electricity costs for working households.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Today I continue rebuilding from the ground up. I currently drive for Uber while also working in sales roles connected to renewable energy and debt-resolution support.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Where I Am Now
Candidate campaign source
Today I continue rebuilding from the ground up. I currently drive for Uber while also working in sales roles connected to renewable energy and debt-resolution support.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Gas prices are soaring, groceries cost too much, and rents are out of control all across East Tennessee. Washington insiders on both sides of the aisle aren't working to make our lives better — they're waiting it out.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Michaela is working for East Tennessee.
Candidate campaign source
Gas prices are soaring, groceries cost too much, and rents are out of control all across East Tennessee. Washington insiders on both sides of the aisle aren't working to make our lives better — they're waiting it out.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Tennessee candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Tennessee incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Tennessee legislators and Tennessee’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Tennessee’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
6 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Tennessee incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Bo Mitchell
Tennessee House of Representatives, District 50 · D–TN
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Bo MitchellTennessee Legislature · HB 2194
As introduced, reduces the gasoline tax from 26 cents per gallon to 20 cents per gallon.
Jan 31, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Bo Mitchell · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2194 would have reduced Tennessee's gasoline tax from 26 cents to 20 cents per gallon.
HB 2194 was assigned to the House Transportation Subcommittee on January 31, 2024, and did not pass before the 113th General Assembly ended.
Why this record is included
HB 2194 would have cut Tennessee's gasoline tax by 6 cents per gallon, directly reducing one tax component of retail gasoline prices. The bill was assigned to the House Transportation Subcommittee and did not pass during the 113th General Assembly.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official bill caption states that HB 2194 would reduce the gasoline tax from 26 cents per gallon to 20 cents per gallon.
U.S. representative for Tennessee, District 3 · R–TN
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Charles J. "Chuck" FleischmannU.S. Congress · Tennessee delegation · H.R.9022
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027
Jun 23, 2026 · Committee action
Rep. Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The FY2027 Energy and Water appropriations bill includes funding for DOE Nuclear Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission within a broader federal spending measure.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1377 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1181, H.R. 9022, H.R. 8595 and H.R. 9237. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1181 and H.R. 9237 under a closed rule and H.R. 9022 and H.R. 8595 under a structured rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
Why this record is included
The federal appropriation includes Department of Energy Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission funding. Those programs concern civilian reactor development and oversight; the bill neither sets Tennessee’s nuclear share nor establishes an effect on the 2024 value.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027 This bill provides FY2027 appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Energy (DOE), and several independent agencies. The bill provides appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including for Investigations, Construction, Mississippi River and Tributaries, Operation and Maintenance, the Regulatory Program, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, Expenses, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, and the Water…
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026
Sep 10, 2025 · Passed the House
Rep. Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The FY2026 Energy and Water appropriations bill includes funding for DOE Nuclear Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission within a broader federal spending measure.
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 156.
Why this record is included
The federal appropriation includes Department of Energy Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission funding. Those programs concern civilian reactor development and oversight; the bill neither sets Tennessee’s nuclear share nor establishes an effect on the 2024 value.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 This bill provides FY2026 appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of Energy (DOE), and several independent agencies. The bill provides appropriations for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, including for Investigations, Construction, Mississippi River and Tributaries, Operation and Maintenance, the Regulatory Program, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, Expenses, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, and the Water…
Tennessee House of Representatives, District 46 · R–TN
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Clark BoydTennessee Legislature · HB 1133
As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
May 27, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. Clark Boyd · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Taxes - As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
The official Tennessee General Assembly record shows the measure was enacted by May 27, 2025.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses nuclear-power generation, reactor deployment, or the fuel and regulatory systems used to produce nuclear electricity. It does not establish an effect on Tennessee's nuclear generation share.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Taxes - As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
U.S. representative for Tennessee, District 1 · R–TN
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Diana HarshbargerU.S. Congress · Tennessee delegation · H.R.9613
Nuclear Advisory Committee Reform Act
Jul 14, 2026 · Committee action
Rep. Diana Harshbarger · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
update the role of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards in the licensing and oversight of nuclear reactor facilities, and for other purposes
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses nuclear-power generation, reactor deployment, or the fuel and regulatory systems used to produce nuclear electricity. It does not establish an effect on Tennessee's nuclear generation share.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
update the role of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards in the licensing and oversight of nuclear reactor facilities, and for other purposes
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Shane ReevesTennessee Legislature · SB 885
As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
May 27, 2025 · Companion enacted · Public Chapter 517
Sen. Shane Reeves · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Taxes - As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
HB 1133 became Public Chapter 517; SB 885 was substituted rather than separately enacted. The official companion-chapter entry is dated 2025-05-27.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses nuclear-power generation, reactor deployment, or the fuel and regulatory systems used to produce nuclear electricity. It does not establish an effect on Tennessee's nuclear generation share.
Retained Tennessee evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Taxes - As enacted, allows nuclear energy production facilities to seek pollution control tax credits for certain machinery and equipment.
Only current Tennessee officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Tennessee statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Tennessee snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Tennessee, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.
