Tennessee · individual fact

Tennessee prices and inflation

Compare Tennessee’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Tennessee CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level91.92024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.22024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level79.12024 · #32 of 50 · highest first

Tennessee over time

Explore Tennessee readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Tennessee officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Tennessee effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Tennessee change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Tennessee · source units
TennesseePublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 91.988.494.8101.2Tennessee, 2014: 92.8Tennessee, 2015: 92.8Tennessee, 2016: 93.8Tennessee, 2017: 93Tennessee, 2018: 89.6Tennessee, 2019: 91.3Tennessee, 2020: 90.5Tennessee, 2021: 90.6Tennessee, 2022: 91.8Tennessee, 2023: 92.1Tennessee, 2024: 91.9201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Tennessee Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Tennessee delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Tennessee agencies · 12005-08-012026-09-30

4 of 4 reviewed Tennessee actions match · 4 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Tennessee · 2024: 91.9 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Tennessee with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Tennessee All-items price level · source units
PeriodTennesseeRankU.S. benchmark
202491.9#37 of 50100
202392.1#33 of 50100
202291.8#33 of 50100
202190.6#42 of 50100
202090.5#44 of 50100
201991.3#43 of 50100
201889.6#44 of 50100
201793#32 of 50100
201693.8#30 of 50100
201592.8#37 of 50100
201492.8#38 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Tennessee · state comparison

How does Tennessee’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Tennessee · 202491.9
Tennessee rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Tennessee with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Tennessee
All-items price level history in Tennessee88.194.8101.620142024
2024 · Tennessee: 91.9 · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Tennessee All-items price level history
PeriodTennesseeCompare
201492.8
201592.8
201693.8
201793
201889.6
201991.3
202090.5
202190.6
202291.8
202392.1
202491.9

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Tennessee · 91.92024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee · your comparison91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Tennessee · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Tennessee · 20242.4%
Tennessee rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Tennessee
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Tennessee-3.1%3.2%9.4%20152024
2024 · Tennessee: 2.4% · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Tennessee Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodTennesseeCompare
20150.2%
20162.1%
20170.9%
2018-1.7%
20193.3%
20200.3%
20214.2%
20228%
20234.1%
20242.4%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Tennessee · 2.4%2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee · your comparison2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Tennessee · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Tennessee · 2024$58,582
Tennessee rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Tennessee
Real personal income per person history in Tennessee$42.5K$52.03K$61.57K20142024
2024 · Tennessee: $58,582 · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Tennessee Real personal income per person history
PeriodTennesseeCompare
2014$44,696
2015$46,517
2016$46,670
2017$47,841
2018$50,876
2019$51,865
2020$55,023
2021$58,589
2022$55,524
2023$57,242
2024$58,582

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Tennessee stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Tennessee has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Tennessee · $58,5822024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Tennessee with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee · your comparison$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Tennessee candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

23 statements from 12 candidates

2026 Tennessee Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Lauren Pinkston

2 statements

Independent · Governor · TN

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Lauren supports repealing the total ban and replacing it with common-sense legislation that trusts women to make these decisions with their doctors. That means real protections in cases like lethal fetal anomalies, rape, incest, and trafficking. Her main focus is lowering the numbers with solutions …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Lauren supports repealing the total ban and replacing it with common-sense legislation that trusts women to make these decisions with their doctors. That means real protections in cases like lethal fetal anomalies, rape, incest, and trafficking. Her main focus is lowering the numbers with solutions that address why women feel they have no choice: guaranteed contraception, full reproductive healthcare, relief from the cost of living, childcare options, and eliminating maternity care deserts. Consistent with existing federal law, elective abortions would not be paid for by taxpayer dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Lauren Pinkston — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Lauren Pinkston
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Too many Tennessee families spend a large share of their income on utility bills. Lauren will prioritize policies that expand access to lower-cost energy sources, modernize the power grid, and encourage competition and innovation that bring down electricity costs for working households.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, technology, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Too many Tennessee families spend a large share of their income on utility bills. Lauren will prioritize policies that expand access to lower-cost energy sources, modernize the power grid, and encourage competition and innovation that bring down electricity costs for working households.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Lauren Pinkston — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Tennessee U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Michaela Barnett

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · TN

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Gas prices are soaring, groceries cost too much, and rents are out of control all across East Tennessee. Washington insiders on both sides of the aisle aren't working to make our lives better — they're waiting it out.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Michaela is working for East Tennessee.

Candidate campaign source

Gas prices are soaring, groceries cost too much, and rents are out of control all across East Tennessee. Washington insiders on both sides of the aisle aren't working to make our lives better — they're waiting it out.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Michaela Barnett — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Tennessee U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Anna Golladay

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · TN

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Fund Community Land Trusts - Community land trusts keep housing permanently affordable in Tennessee neighborhoods instead of losing homes to outside investors and rising rents.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY

Candidate campaign source

Fund Community Land Trusts - Community land trusts keep housing permanently affordable in Tennessee neighborhoods instead of losing homes to outside investors and rising rents.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Anna Golladay — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Tennessee candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Tennessee incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Tennessee legislators and Tennessee’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Tennessee’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Tennessee incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Aftyn Behn

Tennessee House of Representatives, District 51 · D–TN

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Aftyn Behn
Tennessee Legislature · HB 2340

As introduced, encourages municipalities to study and assess housing affordability and inventory availability, and to adopt a pattern book for purposes of encouraging the construction of medium-density housing.

Mar 18, 2026 · Action Def. in s/c Cities & Counties Subcommittee to January 2027 Calendar

Rep. Aftyn Behn · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Housing - As introduced, encourages municipalities to study and assess housing affordability and inventory availability, and to adopt a pattern book for purposes of encouraging the construction of medium-density housing.

The latest official Tennessee General Assembly record shows this action on March 18, 2026: Action Def. in s/c Cities & Counties Subcommittee to January 2027 Calendar.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Tennessee's median gross rent.

Retained Tennessee evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Housing - As introduced, encourages municipalities to study and assess housing affordability and inventory availability, and to adopt a pattern book for purposes of encouraging the construction of medium-density housing.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bo Mitchell

Tennessee House of Representatives, District 50 · D–TN

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bo Mitchell
Tennessee Legislature · HB 2194

As introduced, reduces the gasoline tax from 26 cents per gallon to 20 cents per gallon.

Jan 31, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Bo Mitchell · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2194 would have reduced Tennessee's gasoline tax from 26 cents to 20 cents per gallon.

HB 2194 was assigned to the House Transportation Subcommittee on January 31, 2024, and did not pass before the 113th General Assembly ended.

Why this record is included

HB 2194 would have cut Tennessee's gasoline tax by 6 cents per gallon, directly reducing one tax component of retail gasoline prices. The bill was assigned to the House Transportation Subcommittee and did not pass during the 113th General Assembly.

Retained Tennessee evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The official bill caption states that HB 2194 would reduce the gasoline tax from 26 cents per gallon to 20 cents per gallon.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Jeff Yarbro

Tennessee Senate, District 21 · D–TN

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Jeff Yarbro
Tennessee Legislature · SB 2516

As introduced, encourages municipalities to study and assess housing affordability and inventory availability, and to adopt a pattern book for purposes of encouraging the construction of medium-density housing.

Mar 17, 2026 · Recommended for passage with amendment/s, refer to Senate Calendar Committee Ayes 8, Nays 1 PNV 0

Sen. Jeff Yarbro · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Housing - As introduced, encourages municipalities to study and assess housing affordability and inventory availability, and to adopt a pattern book for purposes of encouraging the construction of medium-density housing.

The latest official Tennessee General Assembly record shows this action on March 17, 2026: Recommended for passage with amendment/s, refer to Senate Calendar Committee Ayes 8, Nays 1 PNV 0.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, eviction, rental assistance, or housing supply and affordability. It does not establish an effect on Tennessee's median gross rent.

Retained Tennessee evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Housing - As introduced, encourages municipalities to study and assess housing affordability and inventory availability, and to adopt a pattern book for purposes of encouraging the construction of medium-density housing.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Tennessee officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Tennessee statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 5, 2026.