South Dakota · individual fact

South Dakota education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher93.2%2020–2024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher44.3%2020–2024 · #26 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher31.9%2020–2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first

South Dakota over time

Explore South Dakota readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Dakota officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Dakota effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Dakota change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading South Dakota · source units
South DakotaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 214.1213218.8224.5South Dakota, 2003: 222.3South Dakota, 2005: 222.4South Dakota, 2007: 223.4South Dakota, 2009: 222.2South Dakota, 2011: 219.8South Dakota, 2013: 217.9South Dakota, 2015: 220.5South Dakota, 2017: 221.8South Dakota, 2019: 222South Dakota, 2022: 218.1South Dakota, 2024: 214.1200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformSouth Dakota · Early blizzard disrupts western South Dakota · 2013-10-03South Dakota October blizzardNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● South Dakota Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · South Dakota delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ South Dakota agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2003-12-012026-08-31

2 of 2 reviewed South Dakota actions match · 2 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

South Dakota · 2024: 214.1 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in South Dakota. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Dakota Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodSouth DakotaRankU.S. benchmark
2024214.1#30 of 50215
2022218.1#14 of 50217.5
2019222#14 of 50220.5
2017221.8#26 of 50221.9
2015220.5#34 of 50222.5
2013217.9#37 of 50221.8
2011219.8#33 of 50221.2
2009222.2#25 of 50220.9
2007223.4#22 of 50221
2005222.4#18 of 50219
2003222.3#13 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Dakota · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

South Dakota · 2020–202493.2%
South Dakota rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Dakota · 93.2%2020–2024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota · your comparison93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

93.2%2020–2024 estimate

Share of South Dakota residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
  • A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
South Dakota · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

South Dakota · 2024214.1
South Dakota rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in South Dakota. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Dakota
Grade 4 reading history in South Dakota212.7218.8224.820032024
2024 · South Dakota: 214.1 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Dakota Grade 4 reading history
PeriodSouth DakotaCompare
2003222.3
2005222.4
2007223.4
2009222.2
2011219.8
2013217.9
2015220.5
2017221.8
2019222
2022218.1
2024214.1

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Dakota · 214.12024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota · your comparison214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Dakota · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

South Dakota · FY2024$12,828
South Dakota rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Dakota · $12,828FY2024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota · your comparison$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Dakota · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

South Dakota · 2021–2282%
South Dakota rank#40among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Dakota
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in South Dakota79%83.5%88.1%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · South Dakota: 82% · Rank #40 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Dakota Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodSouth DakotaCompare
2011–1283%
2012–1383%
2013–1483%
2014–1584%
2015–1684%
2016–1784%
2017–1884%
2018–1984%
2019–2084%
2020–2183%
2021–2282%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Dakota · 82%2021–22 · Rank #40 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Dakota with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota · your comparison82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Dakota · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

South Dakota · 2022–23$9,079
South Dakota rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Dakota · $9,0792022–23 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota · your comparison$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s South Dakota candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

22 statements from 4 candidates

2026 South Dakota Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 8 statements

Dan Ahlers

8 statements

Democratic · Governor and Lieutenant Governor · SD

Schools & education

Invest in school infrastructure so students have the facilities they need to succeed.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Invest in school infrastructure so students have the facilities they need to succeed.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Ahlers — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 7 more statements from Dan Ahlers
Schools & education

Expand access to early childhood education and childcare so every student starts ready to learn.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Expand access to early childhood education and childcare so every student starts ready to learn.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Ahlers — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Keep rural healthcare accessible and invest heavily in public education to keep more of our bright minds in-state.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Keep rural healthcare accessible and invest heavily in public education to keep more of our bright minds in-state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Ahlers — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Strengthen rural schools and keep them at the heart of their communities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen rural schools and keep them at the heart of their communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Ahlers — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Recruit and retain great teachers in classrooms across the state.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Recruit and retain great teachers in classrooms across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Ahlers — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Create new afterschool programs so children and students can access new enrichment and extra learning sources.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Create new afterschool programs so children and students can access new enrichment and extra learning sources.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Ahlers — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Partner with businesses, schools, and unions to train our workforce for the jobs of tomorrow.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Partner with businesses, schools, and unions to train our workforce for the jobs of tomorrow.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Ahlers — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Prepare students for college, careers, and technical trades through real workforce pathways.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Prepare students for college, careers, and technical trades through real workforce pathways.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Ahlers — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Dakota U.S. House — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 11 statements

Democratic · U.S. House · SD

Schools & education

Protect Title I funding for schools serving students from low-income families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Protect Title I funding for schools serving students from low-income families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 10 more statements from Nicole "Nikki" Gronli
Schools & education

Ensure every student has access to high-quality instruction, regardless of their ZIP code.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Ensure every student has access to high-quality instruction, regardless of their ZIP code.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

I support Special Education in our schools, but that’s not where that support should end. Accessibility is a lifelong need, and I will work with others in Congress to increase Medicaid funding for those who choose to live in their home with assistance, receive live-in caregiving, or live in assisted…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

I support Special Education in our schools, but that’s not where that support should end. Accessibility is a lifelong need, and I will work with others in Congress to increase Medicaid funding for those who choose to live in their home with assistance, receive live-in caregiving, or live in assisted living facilities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Expanding access to workforce training, apprenticeships, and education opportunities that lead to good-paying careers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Expanding access to workforce training, apprenticeships, and education opportunities that lead to good-paying careers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Invest in rural schools so students in every community have access to the educational opportunities they deserve.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Invest in rural schools so students in every community have access to the educational opportunities they deserve.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

South Dakota’s educators work hard every day to give our children the best possible start in life. They deserve the resources, respect, and support they need to do their jobs well. Our parents deserve schools that are safe, welcoming, and focused on helping every student succeed. Too many schools, u…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

South Dakota’s educators work hard every day to give our children the best possible start in life. They deserve the resources, respect, and support they need to do their jobs well. Our parents deserve schools that are safe, welcoming, and focused on helping every student succeed. Too many schools, unfortunately, are being asked to do more with less. Rural districts face declining enrollment, workforce shortages, aging facilities, and challenges recruiting and retaining teachers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) so schools can provide students with disabilities the education and services they deserve.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) so schools can provide students with disabilities the education and services they deserve.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

I believe high-quality early childhood education and pre-K can change the trajectory of a child’s life. When children start school ready to learn, they’re more likely to read proficiently, graduate from high school, and succeed in college, technical education, military service, or the workforce. Inv…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

I believe high-quality early childhood education and pre-K can change the trajectory of a child’s life. When children start school ready to learn, they’re more likely to read proficiently, graduate from high school, and succeed in college, technical education, military service, or the workforce. Investing in our youngest learners is one of the smartest investments we can make for South Dakota’s future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

I also believe that creating uncertainty for students, families, and educators is the wrong approach. I oppose efforts to close the U.S. Department of Education redistributes its responsibilities across multiple federal agencies. South Dakota schools need a reliable federal partner that helps ensure…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

I also believe that creating uncertainty for students, families, and educators is the wrong approach. I oppose efforts to close the U.S. Department of Education redistributes its responsibilities across multiple federal agencies. South Dakota schools need a reliable federal partner that helps ensure students have access to the resources they need, not more bureaucracy or confusion.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

That is especially true for students with disabilities. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) has helped ensure that children receive the services and supports they need to succeed in school. Fragmenting responsibility for special education across multiple federal departments would …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

That is especially true for students with disabilities. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) has helped ensure that children receive the services and supports they need to succeed in school. Fragmenting responsibility for special education across multiple federal departments would make it harder for families and schools to navigate the system and could weaken accountability. Students with disabilities deserve timely services and individualized support, while every student should have access to career and technical education, advanced coursework, and opportunities that prepare them for good-paying jobs here at home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Support competitive teacher pay and strengthen recruitment and retention efforts, especially in rural communities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Support competitive teacher pay and strengthen recruitment and retention efforts, especially in rural communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Dakota U.S. Senate — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Brian L. Bengs

1 statement

Independent · U.S. Senate · SD

Schools & education

Affordable living is the foundation of a stable and productive society. If day-to-day requirements like housing, healthcare, food, and education are unaffordable, working families struggle and the American dream shrinks. That dream is already fading when 50 percent of Americans believe there is litt…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Affordable living is the foundation of a stable and productive society. If day-to-day requirements like housing, healthcare, food, and education are unaffordable, working families struggle and the American dream shrinks. That dream is already fading when 50 percent of Americans believe there is little chance young people will have better lives than their parents and 32 percent of regular people do not have any emergency savings. Affordability means people working full-time can live with dignity. Good policies like fair wages, targeted subsidies, and tax credits make a difference. The goal is to restructure our economic system so it delivers for regular people, too, not just Big Money that has engineered the status quo. Specifics are available here: https://substack.com/p/its-all-about-affordability

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Brian L. Bengs — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Mike Rounds

2 statements

Republican · U.S. Senate · SD

Schools & education

Education

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: On the Issues

Candidate campaign source

Education

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Mike Rounds — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Mike Rounds
Schools & education

Mike is working with President Trump to lead the effort to eliminate the Department of Education. He believes in local control of education, and while standards are important, a “one size fits all” directive from the federal government does not serve our children well.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Mike is working with President Trump to lead the effort to eliminate the Department of Education. He believes in local control of education, and while standards are important, a “one size fits all” directive from the federal government does not serve our children well.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Mike Rounds — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Dakota candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Dakota incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Dakota legislators and South Dakota’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Dakota’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 South Dakota incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Amber Arlint

South Dakota House of Representatives · R–SD

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Amber Arlint
South Dakota Legislature · HB 1244

repeal the special donations fund and make an appropriation to the Department of Education for the provision of a grant to support the Jobs for America's Graduates-South Dakota program.

Mar 27, 2026 · Enacted · Signed by governor

Rep. Amber Arlint · Sponsored / Sen. Tim Reed · Sponsored / Rep. Eric Emery · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tim Goodwin · Co-sponsored / Rep. Liz May · Co-sponsored / Rep. Erik Muckey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Brian Mulder · Co-sponsored / Rep. Rebecca Reimer · Co-sponsored / Rep. Matt Roby · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nicole Uhre-Balk · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kevin Van Diepen · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kadyn Wittman · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1244 appropriates $500,000 to the Department of Education for a nonprofit grant supporting Jobs for America’s Graduates programs in school districts and accredited nonpublic schools. It limits use to specified matching or collaborative support, excludes endowment additions, and takes effect June 30, 2026. The department identifies JAG-SD as supporting students toward high school graduation. Appropriation and program purpose do not establish completed grants or diplomas.

Approved by Gov. Larry Rhoden on 2026-03-27. The text specifies June 30, 2026 as its effective date. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures high-school-or-higher attainment among residents age 25 and older. The grant supports a program serving students toward high school graduation, rather than the already-measured adult population. Funding does not establish completed diplomas or a change in adult attainment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained South Dakota evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. There is appropriated $500,000 from the general fund, to the Department of Education, for the purpose of providing a grant to a nonprofit organization located within the state to provide financial support to school districts and accredited nonpublic schools implementing the Jobs for America's Graduates program. Section 2. The grant may be used only to: (1) Match moneys received from private contributions or donations; (2) Match any federal education or career readiness grants received by the Jobs for America's Graduates-South Dakota program; or (3) Support larger, collaborative efforts in which the nonprofit organization is a partner. Any moneys generated or efforts supported under this section must be directed toward the operations of a Jobs for America's Graduates program in a school district or accredited nonpublic school located within this state and may not be added to an endowment fund. Section 3. The secretary of the Department of Education shall approve vouchers and the state auditor shall draw warrants to pay expenditures authorized by this Act. Section 4. Any amounts appropriated in this Act not lawfully expended or obligated shall revert in accordance with the procedures described in chapter 4-8. Section 5. The state treasurer shall transfer any moneys currently held in the special donation fund, created pursuant to § 13-66-3, to the general fund. Section 6. That § 13-66-3 be REPEALED. Section 7. This Act is effective beginning June 30, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brian Mulder

South Dakota House of Representatives · R–SD

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brian Mulder
South Dakota Legislature · HB 1251

create the community-based providers methodology supplement fund, create the target teacher salary supplement fund, and provide for the transfer of certain unobligated cash balances to the fund.

Feb 23, 2026 · Not enacted · Deferred to 41st day

Rep. Brian Mulder · Sponsored / Rep. Roger DeGroot · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Emery · Co-sponsored / Rep. Erik Muckey · Co-sponsored / Sen. Carl Perry · Co-sponsored / Sen. Mykala Voita · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1251 proposed a target teacher salary supplement fund administered by the Department of Education. The fund would support budget requests to increase the statutory target teacher salary, with expenditures through the general appropriation bill. A separate provision proposed routing 30% of remaining unobligated cash to the fund after the reserve requirement. The committee deferred the bill to the 41st legislative day on February 23, 2026; it did not create this fund or guarantee salary increases.

The House Committee on Appropriations deferred the bill to the 41st legislative day on 2026-02-23. The 2026 regular session has ended without enactment of this measure.

Why this record is included

Household money income includes wages before taxes. A proposed fund to increase the target teacher salary concerns teachers’ earnings within household income. A funding-formula target is not a guaranteed paycheck increase; the bill failed and did not establish higher salaries or a higher statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained South Dakota evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. That a NEW SECTION be added to chapter 13-13: There is created in the state treasury the target teacher salary supplement fund. The fund consists of moneys specified for deposit in the fund pursuant to § 4-7-32. The Department of Education shall administer the fund. The purpose of the fund is to enable an increase to the target teacher salary, as set forth in § 13-13-10.1. The department, as part of the annual budget submission, in accordance with § 4-7-7, shall submit a budget request utilizing money from the fund to provide an increase in the target teacher salary, as set forth in § 13-13-10.1. Interest on moneys credited to the fund must remain in the fund. Expenditures from the fund must be budgeted through the general appropriation bill. Section 4. That § 4-7-32 be AMENDED: 4-7-32. The transfer of all prior year unobligated cash must occur in accordance with this section: (1) On July first of each fiscal year or at the time that the prior fiscal year general fund unobligated cash balance is determined, the commissioner of the Bureau of Finance and Management shall transfer prior year unobligated cash, up to an amount equaling ten percent of the general fund appropriations from the general appropriation act for the prior fiscal year, into the budget reserve fund. The cash balance in the budget reserve fund may not exceed ten percent of the general fund appropriations from the general appropriation act for the prior fiscal year; (2) If any unobligated cash balance remains after the requirements of subdivision (1) are met, the commissioner must: (a) Transfer thirty percent of the remaining balance to the community-based providers methodology supplement fund, created in section 2 of this Act; (b) Transfer thirty percent of the remaining balance to the target teacher salary supplement fund, created in section 1 of this Act; and (c) Transfer forty percent of the remaining balance to the general revenue placement fund, created in § 4-7-45.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Tim Reed

South Dakota Senate · R–SD

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Tim Reed
South Dakota Legislature · HB 1244

repeal the special donations fund and make an appropriation to the Department of Education for the provision of a grant to support the Jobs for America's Graduates-South Dakota program.

Mar 27, 2026 · Enacted · Signed by governor

Rep. Amber Arlint · Sponsored / Sen. Tim Reed · Sponsored / Rep. Eric Emery · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tim Goodwin · Co-sponsored / Rep. Liz May · Co-sponsored / Rep. Erik Muckey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Brian Mulder · Co-sponsored / Rep. Rebecca Reimer · Co-sponsored / Rep. Matt Roby · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nicole Uhre-Balk · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kevin Van Diepen · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kadyn Wittman · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1244 appropriates $500,000 to the Department of Education for a nonprofit grant supporting Jobs for America’s Graduates programs in school districts and accredited nonpublic schools. It limits use to specified matching or collaborative support, excludes endowment additions, and takes effect June 30, 2026. The department identifies JAG-SD as supporting students toward high school graduation. Appropriation and program purpose do not establish completed grants or diplomas.

Approved by Gov. Larry Rhoden on 2026-03-27. The text specifies June 30, 2026 as its effective date. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures high-school-or-higher attainment among residents age 25 and older. The grant supports a program serving students toward high school graduation, rather than the already-measured adult population. Funding does not establish completed diplomas or a change in adult attainment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained South Dakota evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. There is appropriated $500,000 from the general fund, to the Department of Education, for the purpose of providing a grant to a nonprofit organization located within the state to provide financial support to school districts and accredited nonpublic schools implementing the Jobs for America's Graduates program. Section 2. The grant may be used only to: (1) Match moneys received from private contributions or donations; (2) Match any federal education or career readiness grants received by the Jobs for America's Graduates-South Dakota program; or (3) Support larger, collaborative efforts in which the nonprofit organization is a partner. Any moneys generated or efforts supported under this section must be directed toward the operations of a Jobs for America's Graduates program in a school district or accredited nonpublic school located within this state and may not be added to an endowment fund. Section 3. The secretary of the Department of Education shall approve vouchers and the state auditor shall draw warrants to pay expenditures authorized by this Act. Section 4. Any amounts appropriated in this Act not lawfully expended or obligated shall revert in accordance with the procedures described in chapter 4-8. Section 5. The state treasurer shall transfer any moneys currently held in the special donation fund, created pursuant to § 13-66-3, to the general fund. Section 6. That § 13-66-3 be REPEALED. Section 7. This Act is effective beginning June 30, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Dakota officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Dakota statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.