South Dakota · individual fact

South Dakota prices and inflation

Compare South Dakota’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide South Dakota CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level88.62024 · #45 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level95.52024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level67.62024 · #42 of 50 · highest first

South Dakota over time

Explore South Dakota readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Dakota officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Dakota effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Dakota change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level South Dakota · source units
South DakotaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 88.685.793.6101.5South Dakota, 2014: 89.4South Dakota, 2015: 87.8South Dakota, 2016: 87.3South Dakota, 2017: 87.2South Dakota, 2018: 91.2South Dakota, 2019: 91.8South Dakota, 2020: 91.3South Dakota, 2021: 90.1South Dakota, 2022: 87.9South Dakota, 2023: 88.1South Dakota, 2024: 88.6201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● South Dakota Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · South Dakota delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 2■ South Dakota agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

3 of 3 reviewed South Dakota actions match · 3 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

South Dakota · 2024: 88.6 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare South Dakota with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Dakota All-items price level · source units
PeriodSouth DakotaRankU.S. benchmark
202488.6#45 of 50100
202388.1#48 of 50100
202287.9#48 of 50100
202190.1#43 of 50100
202091.3#39 of 50100
201991.8#40 of 50100
201891.2#41 of 50100
201787.2#50 of 50100
201687.3#50 of 50100
201587.8#50 of 50100
201489.4#49 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Dakota · state comparison

How does South Dakota’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

South Dakota · 202488.6
South Dakota rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare South Dakota with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Dakota
All-items price level history in South Dakota85.393.6101.920142024
2024 · South Dakota: 88.6 · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Dakota All-items price level history
PeriodSouth DakotaCompare
201489.4
201587.8
201687.3
201787.2
201891.2
201991.8
202091.3
202190.1
202287.9
202388.1
202488.6

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Dakota · 88.62024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota · your comparison88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Dakota · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

South Dakota · 20243.1%
South Dakota rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Dakota
Annual change in regional price deflator history in South Dakota-2.8%2.6%7.9%20152024
2024 · South Dakota: 3.1% · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Dakota Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodSouth DakotaCompare
2015-1.6%
20160.4%
20171.7%
20186.7%
20192.1%
20200.6%
20212.7%
20223.9%
20234.2%
20243.1%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Dakota · 3.1%2024 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota · your comparison3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Dakota · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

South Dakota · 2024$69,153
South Dakota rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Dakota
Real personal income per person history in South Dakota$44.33K$58.76K$73.19K20142024
2024 · South Dakota: $69,153 · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Dakota Real personal income per person history
PeriodSouth DakotaCompare
2014$53,918
2015$56,644
2016$56,407
2017$56,779
2018$55,531
2019$57,354
2020$62,511
2021$68,551
2022$68,469
2023$69,861
2024$69,153

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Dakota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Dakota has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Dakota · $69,1532024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Dakota with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota · your comparison$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s South Dakota candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

6 statements from 5 candidates

2026 South Dakota Public Utilities Commissioner — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Don Haggar

2 statements

Republican · Public Utilities Commissioner · SD

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Fight costly mandates and overregulation while promoting competition to reduce prices, keeping utility costs low for families and job creators.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Fight costly mandates and overregulation while promoting competition to reduce prices, keeping utility costs low for families and job creators.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Don Haggar — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Don Haggar
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Affordable Energy Fight costly mandates and overregulation while promoting competition to reduce prices, keeping utility costs low for families and job creators.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reliable Energy

Candidate campaign source

Affordable Energy Fight costly mandates and overregulation while promoting competition to reduce prices, keeping utility costs low for families and job creators.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Don Haggar — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Frank Kloucek

1 statement

Democratic · Public Utilities Commissioner · SD

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Frank believes South Dakota’s energy and water resources should serve families, farms, small businesses, and local communities first — not massive data centers that could strain the grid, drive up utility costs, or consume limited resources without enough public benefit. As Public Utilities Commissi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Frank believes South Dakota’s energy and water resources should serve families, farms, small businesses, and local communities first — not massive data centers that could strain the grid, drive up utility costs, or consume limited resources without enough public benefit. As Public Utilities Commissioner, Frank would demand full transparency, local input, and a clear accounting of who pays for the infrastructure these projects require. He opposes any data center development that leaves South Dakotans with higher bills, fewer resources, or less control over their own communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Frank Kloucek — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Dakota U.S. House — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House · SD

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Reducing the cost pressures that make it harder for families to get ahead, including housing, child care, health care, and energy costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Reducing the cost pressures that make it harder for families to get ahead, including housing, child care, health care, and energy costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nicole "Nikki" Gronli — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Dakota U.S. Senate — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Brian L. Bengs

1 statement

Independent · U.S. Senate · SD

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

The healthcare industry is effectively a monopoly. Big Money owns career politicians who keep the entire system rigged for maximum profit. Healthcare accounted for 27 percent of federal spending in fiscal year 2024, a percentage projected to rise dramatically if nothing changes. Compared to other we…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

The healthcare industry is effectively a monopoly. Big Money owns career politicians who keep the entire system rigged for maximum profit. Healthcare accounted for 27 percent of federal spending in fiscal year 2024, a percentage projected to rise dramatically if nothing changes. Compared to other wealthy countries, the U.S. spends far more per person on healthcare and pays 278 percent higher prescription drug prices. Indeed, since the adoption of the Affordable Care Act, the top 5 for-profit health insurance companies have collected 230 percent more profits while premiums skyrocketed. It’s no wonder medical debt causes over 50 percent of personal bankruptcies. By every measure, regular people are getting the shaft. Completely overhauling American healthcare is a complex challenge that we literally cannot afford to ignore any longer. A 5-stage effects-based process of reinventing our system will simultaneously reduce costs while improving the affordability and accessibility that everyday Americans deserve.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Brian L. Bengs — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Mike Rounds

1 statement

Republican · U.S. Senate · SD

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Mike is a strong advocate for American energy independence and supports an “all-of-the-above” approach to energy production. He believes the United States should maximize the use of its natural resources to lower energy costs, create jobs and reduce reliance on foreign energy sources. Mike has oppos…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Mike is a strong advocate for American energy independence and supports an “all-of-the-above” approach to energy production. He believes the United States should maximize the use of its natural resources to lower energy costs, create jobs and reduce reliance on foreign energy sources. Mike has opposed excessive federal regulations on energy producers and has consistently backed policies that support domestic energy development.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Mike Rounds — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Dakota candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Dakota incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Dakota legislators and South Dakota’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Dakota’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 South Dakota incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Erin Healy

South Dakota House of Representatives · D–SD

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Erin Healy
South Dakota Legislature · HB 1301

limit costs and risks associated with electricity use by data centers and impose a moratorium.

Feb 18, 2026 · Not enacted · Deferred to 41st day

Rep. Erin Healy · Sponsored / Sen. Liz Larson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Erik Muckey · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1301 proposed requiring electric utilities, when establishing or negotiating rates or tariffs for any data center, to allocate its full service, infrastructure and decommissioning costs to that data center and protect other retail customers from transferred costs and stranded-asset risks. A separate proposed moratorium through June 30, 2027 covered new construction or expansion of large data centers, including expansions that would bring a smaller center to the threshold of at least 20 megawatts of peak demand. The committee deferred the bill to the 41st legislative day on February 18, 2026. It was not enacted and created no moratorium or rate protection.

The House State Affairs deferred the bill to the 41st legislative day on 2026-02-18. The 2026 regular session has ended without enactment of this measure.

Why this record is included

The EIA fact measures average retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across customer sectors. Proposed rate and tariff requirements concern allocation of electric-service costs between data centers and other customers. The bill was not enacted and did not establish new rates, savings or a change in statewide prices. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained South Dakota evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. That a NEW SECTION be added to chapter 49-34A: Terms used in this Act mean: (1) "Approval authority," for an electric utility that is: (a) A state or rural electric cooperative, the board of directors; or (b) Owned by a municipality or other political subdivision of this state, the governing body; (2) "Data center," any facility that is used as a centralized repository for the dissemination, management, processing, and storage of electronic data and information; and (3) "Large data center," a data center with a peak electricity demand of twenty megawatts or greater. Section 2. That a NEW SECTION be added to chapter 49-34A: When establishing or negotiating a rate or tariff for any data center, an electric utility shall ensure that: (1) The data center pays the full cost of providing electric service to the data center, including the cost of any infrastructure upgrade necessitated by the operation of the data center; (2) The cost of providing electric service to the data center is not paid for by other retail customers; (3) The costs and risks of infrastructure upgrades are not transferred to other retail customers during the operation of the data center; (4) Other retail customers are not placed at financial risk for paying stranded costs associated with providing electric service to the data center if it prematurely ceases operating; and (5) The data center bears all costs of decommissioning the data center. Section 8. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a moratorium is imposed on any new construction or expansion of a large data center in this state. The moratorium includes the expansion of any data center that is not currently a large data center but, if expanded, would become a large data center. The moratorium is in effect through June 30, 2027.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Dakota officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Dakota statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.