South Carolina · individual fact

South Carolina income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and South Carolina’s tax structure.

Median household income$69.32K2020–2024 · #42 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$39.24K2020–2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$52.46K2024 · #44 of 50 · highest first

South Carolina over time

Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $52,463$39.64K$50.56K$61.48KSouth Carolina, 2014: $41,750South Carolina, 2015: $43,683South Carolina, 2016: $44,377South Carolina, 2017: $45,761South Carolina, 2018: $46,643South Carolina, 2019: $48,823South Carolina, 2020: $51,406South Carolina, 2021: $52,444South Carolina, 2022: $50,407South Carolina, 2023: $51,320South Carolina, 2024: $52,463201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 37National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-27: Paid leave for state employees affected by emergency closures · 2015-10-20Executive Order 2015-27South Carolina · Governor’s legal counsel clarifies two full-day paid-leave cases · 2015-10-23Paid-leave correctionNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● South Carolina Legislature · 24222● U.S. Congress · South Carolina delegation · 2◆ Governor · 29222■ South Carolina agencies · 12005-09-012026-07-31

56 of 56 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 50 date markers shown. 37 major events shown separately.

South Carolina · 2024: $52,463 · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Carolina Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodSouth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
2024$52,463#44 of 50$59,195
2023$51,320#45 of 50$58,088
2022$50,407#46 of 50$57,104
2021$52,444#46 of 50$59,365
2020$51,406#42 of 50$56,514
2019$48,823#39 of 50$53,683
2018$46,643#41 of 50$52,242
2017$45,761#42 of 50$51,006
2016$44,377#42 of 50$49,828
2015$43,683#43 of 50$49,396
2014$41,750#44 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Carolina · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

South Carolina · 2020–2024$69,324
South Carolina rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $69,3242020–2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $68,754 – $69,894Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina · your comparison$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$69,3242020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by South Carolina households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
South Carolina · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

South Carolina · 2024$52,463
South Carolina rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Real personal income per person history in South Carolina$39.11K$50.56K$62.01K20142024
2024 · South Carolina: $52,463 · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Real personal income per person history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2014$41,750
2015$43,683
2016$44,377
2017$45,761
2018$46,643
2019$48,823
2020$51,406
2021$52,444
2022$50,407
2023$51,320
2024$52,463

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $52,4632024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina · your comparison$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

How South Carolina raises taxes

Beginning with tax year 2026, taxable income below $30,000 is subject to a 1.99% rate; income of $30,000 or more uses 5.21% less a $966 statutory adjustment. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

South Carolina · FY2024$6.15B
South Carolina rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $6.15BFY2024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina · your comparison$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding South Carolina income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The South Carolina ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

44 statements from 16 candidates

2026 South Carolina Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

David Stumbo

2 statements

Republican · Attorney General · SC

Taxes & tax policy

Saying you are a Republican isn't enough. David Stumbo is a lifelong conservative. David has never wavered in his conservative principles - fiercely supporting bold pro-family truths that the sanctity of life of the unborn, religious liberty, and parental rights must be protected. An advocate for la…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Saying you are a Republican isn't enough. David Stumbo is a lifelong conservative. David has never wavered in his conservative principles - fiercely supporting bold pro-family truths that the sanctity of life of the unborn, religious liberty, and parental rights must be protected. An advocate for law enforcement, healthcare freedom, lower taxes, and a transparent government - David will fight for our conservative values as Attorney General.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

David Stumbo — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from David Stumbo
Taxes & tax policy

Believes South Carolina tax burdens should be lower; the campaign states no tax-setting power available to the Attorney General.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes

Candidate campaign source

Believes South Carolina tax burdens should be lower; the campaign states no tax-setting power available to the Attorney General.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

David Stumbo — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 South Carolina Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements

Alan Wilson

2 statements

Republican · Governor · SC

Taxes & tax policy

Alan Wilson will lead the charge to cut taxes and slash government red tape. He will fight to eliminate the state income tax to reduce the overall tax burden on South Carolina families. Wilson supports exploring every avenue to reduce and eliminate the burden of personal property taxes for seniors a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Alan Wilson will lead the charge to cut taxes and slash government red tape. He will fight to eliminate the state income tax to reduce the overall tax burden on South Carolina families. Wilson supports exploring every avenue to reduce and eliminate the burden of personal property taxes for seniors and veterans, while ensuring essential government services remain funded. He will launch a comprehensive audit of state and local governments to root out fraud, waste, and abuse, returning that money to the taxpayers. The Wilson Administration will prioritize small business growth, workforce development, and creating good-paying jobs. It’s time to Make South Carolina Affordable Again. No more losing business to neighboring states. No more South Carolina families feeling the squeeze from high costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alan Wilson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Alan Wilson
Taxes & tax policy

Too often, our seniors and veterans get forgotten. As Governor, Alan Wilson will change that. He is a combat veteran and has served in the Army National Guard for nearly 3 decades. Wilson knows that having strong communities means taking care of our seniors and veterans. He will work to eliminate th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Too often, our seniors and veterans get forgotten. As Governor, Alan Wilson will change that. He is a combat veteran and has served in the Army National Guard for nearly 3 decades. Wilson knows that having strong communities means taking care of our seniors and veterans. He will work to eliminate the car property tax for seniors and veterans, alike, and always back the people who have given so much to our state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alan Wilson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Jermaine Johnson

5 statements

Democratic · Governor · SC

Taxes & tax policy

It is time to reduce the tax burden on our working class. Some Republicans want to see all income tax disappear. Do not be fooled. In South Carolina, 40% of the lowest earning families do not pay income tax at all (technically they pay it and receive it back in April). Getting rid of income tax comp…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

It is time to reduce the tax burden on our working class. Some Republicans want to see all income tax disappear. Do not be fooled. In South Carolina, 40% of the lowest earning families do not pay income tax at all (technically they pay it and receive it back in April). Getting rid of income tax completely would primarily benefit the wealthiest individuals. Jermaine’s plan is to increase the amount of families who are not paying income tax to 70%. This is more sustainable economically and benefits the working families of South Carolina. Unlike other plans which would give more tax breaks to the wealthiest individuals.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 4 more statements from Jermaine Johnson
Income & wages

It’s time to make South Carolina better for workers. Jermaine will create a labor advisory council to help make this happen. They will be responsible for: recommending a state minimum wage, removing certain barriers to employment, and fighting against dishonest corporate wage theft.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

It’s time to make South Carolina better for workers. Jermaine will create a labor advisory council to help make this happen. They will be responsible for: recommending a state minimum wage, removing certain barriers to employment, and fighting against dishonest corporate wage theft.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

It is time to reduce the tax burden on our working class. Plain and simple, Jermaine will work with municipalities to reduce property taxes for working families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

It is time to reduce the tax burden on our working class. Plain and simple, Jermaine will work with municipalities to reduce property taxes for working families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Lower property taxes

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Lower property taxes

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

It’s time for South Carolina to make medicinal marijuana safe, legal, and accessible. This means more jobs and income for farmers, a state wide tax on cannabis that will allow us to balance the budget, and medical freedom for people who are suffering. Additionally, Jermaine will commute the sentence…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

It’s time for South Carolina to make medicinal marijuana safe, legal, and accessible. This means more jobs and income for farmers, a state wide tax on cannabis that will allow us to balance the budget, and medical freedom for people who are suffering. Additionally, Jermaine will commute the sentence of all prisoners who have non-violent marijuana related charges. This will relieve the burden on our state’s prison system and restore families who have been destroyed by punitive and antiquated drug policies. Finally, Jermaine will put recreational cannabis to a state-wide referendum.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Walid Hakim

1 statement

Green · Governor · SC

Taxes & tax policy

• Require businesses to post tax-inclusive, all-fees-included pricing for all goods and services.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

• Require businesses to post tax-inclusive, all-fees-included pricing for all goods and services.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Carolina State Superintendent of Education — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Sylvia Wright

1 statement

Democratic · State Superintendent of Education · SC

Taxes & tax policy

Provide an enhanced tax credit and childcare vouchers to educators; partner with daycares and afterschool programs to ensure sufficient high-quality programs across the state

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Provide an enhanced tax credit and childcare vouchers to educators; partner with daycares and afterschool programs to ensure sufficient high-quality programs across the state

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 4
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

212 matching sponsorships or proposals · 108 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Adam L. Duncan

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 2 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Adam L. Duncan
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3196

Educator Assistance Act

May 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Annie E. McDaniel

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 41 · D–SC

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Annie E. McDaniel
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3645

Paid family leave

Apr 30, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 4383

South Carolina Medicaid Protection and Expansion Act

Apr 23, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Wendell K. Jones · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Jermaine L. Johnson, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Clyburn · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes expanding Medicaid eligibility to 138% of the federal poverty level and creating a Medicaid Stability Fund to offset federal funding reductions, with enrollment and fiscal planning requirements.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Ways and Means (House Journal-page 50) (2025-04-23). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 44-6-1210. (A) There is created in the State Treasury a fund to be known as the "Medicaid Stability Fund." (B) The fund shall be used exclusively to offset reductions in federal Medicaid funding that impact the State of South Carolina or its Medicaid-eligible populations. […] Section 44-6-1220. (A) The Department of Health and Human Services shall take all actions necessary to fully expand Medicaid eligibility as provided for under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, including: (1) expanding eligibility to individuals earning up to one hundred thirty-eight percent of the federal poverty level; and (2) accessing the enhanced federal match rate of ninety percent for new enrollees. (B) The department shall develop an enrollment plan, fiscal impact report, and implementation timeline within ninety days of the effective date of this article. (C) The department shall submit its report and implementation plan to the General Assembly and the Governor within one hundred twenty days of the effective date of this article.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3998

Workforce and Senior Affordable Housing Act

May 19, 2020 · Enacted

Rep. Bruce W. Bannister · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. JA Moore · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie E. "Coach" Hayes · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Creates a state housing tax credit tied to the federal low-income housing credit for qualifying restricted-rent projects. Applicants must explain tenant benefits or why the credit is needed for the project.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 137 (2020-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set South Carolina’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(4) 'Project' means a housing project that has restricted rents that do not exceed thirty percent of income for at least forty percent of its units occupied by persons or families having incomes of sixty percent or less of the median income, or at least twenty percent of the units occupied by persons or families having incomes of fifty percent or less of the median income. (5) 'Qualified project' means a qualified low-income building as that term is defined in Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that is located in South Carolina and receives approval for tax credits from the South Carolina Housing and Finance Development Authority provided pursuant to this section. […] (B)(1) A state tax credit pursuant to this section may be claimed against income taxes imposed by Section 12-6-510 or 12-6-530, bank taxes imposed pursuant to Chapter 11, Title 12, corporate license fees imposed pursuant to Chapter 20, Title 12, and insurance premium and retaliatory taxes imposed pursuant to Chapter 7, Title 38, to be termed the South Carolina housing tax credit, and is allowed with respect to each qualified project placed in service after January 1, 2020, and before December 31, 2030, in an amount equal to the federal housing tax credit allowed with respect to such qualified project. In computing a tax payable by a taxpayer pursuant to Section 38-7-90, the credit allowed pursuant to this section must be treated as a premium tax paid pursuant to Section 38-7-20. […] (2) The authority may not issue an eligibility statement until the taxpayer provides a report to the authority detailing how the state credit authorized by this section will benefit the tenants of the project, once placed in service including, but not limited to, reduced rent, or why the state credit authorized by this section is necessary to undertake the project.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. April Cromer

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 6 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. April Cromer
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3196

Educator Assistance Act

May 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 78 · D–SC

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Beth E. Bernstein
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3645

Paid family leave

Apr 30, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3490

Paid family leave

Apr 9, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes increasing state paid parental leave to 12 weeks for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, with specified employee eligibility.

The official record’s latest entry is Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Waters (2025-04-09). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) "Eligible state employee" any person employed full-time by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions. This includes any person employed full-time by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported and under the control of the State. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. […] (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3908

Paid family leave

May 12, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Bruce W. Bannister · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy A. "Tim" McGinnis · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Sen. Deon T. Tedder · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Extends the state paid-parental-leave benefit to school-district employees on the same terms as qualifying state employees.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 17 (2023-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(3) "Paid parental leave", for the purpose of duration and percentage of base pay covered, has the same meaning as Section 8-11-150(3) for eligible school district employees. […] (B) Eligible school district employees who experience a qualifying event are entitled to paid parental leave to the same extent available to employees of the State pursuant to Section 8-11-150.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3998

Workforce and Senior Affordable Housing Act

May 19, 2020 · Enacted

Rep. Bruce W. Bannister · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. JA Moore · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie E. "Coach" Hayes · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Creates a state housing tax credit tied to the federal low-income housing credit for qualifying restricted-rent projects. Applicants must explain tenant benefits or why the credit is needed for the project.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 137 (2020-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set South Carolina’s median rent. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(4) 'Project' means a housing project that has restricted rents that do not exceed thirty percent of income for at least forty percent of its units occupied by persons or families having incomes of sixty percent or less of the median income, or at least twenty percent of the units occupied by persons or families having incomes of fifty percent or less of the median income. (5) 'Qualified project' means a qualified low-income building as that term is defined in Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that is located in South Carolina and receives approval for tax credits from the South Carolina Housing and Finance Development Authority provided pursuant to this section. […] (B)(1) A state tax credit pursuant to this section may be claimed against income taxes imposed by Section 12-6-510 or 12-6-530, bank taxes imposed pursuant to Chapter 11, Title 12, corporate license fees imposed pursuant to Chapter 20, Title 12, and insurance premium and retaliatory taxes imposed pursuant to Chapter 7, Title 38, to be termed the South Carolina housing tax credit, and is allowed with respect to each qualified project placed in service after January 1, 2020, and before December 31, 2030, in an amount equal to the federal housing tax credit allowed with respect to such qualified project. In computing a tax payable by a taxpayer pursuant to Section 38-7-90, the credit allowed pursuant to this section must be treated as a premium tax paid pursuant to Section 38-7-20. […] (2) The authority may not issue an eligibility statement until the taxpayer provides a report to the authority detailing how the state credit authorized by this section will benefit the tenants of the project, once placed in service including, but not limited to, reduced rent, or why the state credit authorized by this section is necessary to undertake the project.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Taylor

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 86 · R–SC

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Bill Taylor
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3196

Educator Assistance Act

May 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3126

Vaccine mandates

May 2, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Provides unemployment-benefit eligibility for state or local-government employees when a federal COVID-19 vaccination mandate requires termination to avoid forfeiting federal funds, subject to ordinary benefit requirements. It also prohibits vaccination-based compensation reductions for specified first responders.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 142 (2022-05-02). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(B) If the State or any political subdivision thereof, including a school district, is subject to a federal requirement that would lead to the forfeiture of federal funds due to a failure to require employees, independent contractors, or nonemployee vendors to receive a COVID-19 vaccination: (1) the employer may require an unvaccinated employee, independent contractor, or nonemployee vendor to undergo weekly COVID-19 testing if the federal requirement allows for testing as an alternative to vaccination; or (2) the employee is eligible for unemployment benefits subject to the benefit amounts, duration, and requirements as provided in Article 1, Chapter 35, Title 41 if the federal mandate gives the employer no alternative to terminating the employee without forfeiting federal funds. […] "Section 8-15-80. (A) Neither the State, nor any of its political subdivisions, may terminate, suspend, or otherwise reduce the compensation of a person employed as a first responder if the first responder does not undergo a COVID-19 vaccination.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brandon Newton

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 45 · R–SC

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brandon Newton
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3196

Educator Assistance Act

May 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3645

Paid family leave

Apr 30, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.