South Carolina · individual fact

South Carolina energy and electricity

Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.

Residential electricity price14.23¢/kWh2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.767/gal2026-08 · #38 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$149.512024 · #15 of 50 · highest first

South Carolina over time

Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Residential electricity price South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Residential electricity price2024: 14.23¢/kWh11.44¢/kWh14.46¢/kWh17.48¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2015: 12.57¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2016: 12.65¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2017: 13.02¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2018: 12.44¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2019: 12.99¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2020: 12.78¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2021: 12.86¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2022: 13.59¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2023: 13.68¢/kWhSouth Carolina, 2024: 14.23¢/kWh201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 53National context · Energy Policy Act expands federal energy programs · 2005-08-08Energy Policy ActNational context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Energy law strengthens fuel economy, biofuels and efficiency · 2007-12-19Fuel / efficiency lawNational context · Global oil and energy prices surge · 2008-07-15Oil-price surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Recovery Act funds grid modernization and clean energy · 2009-02-17Recovery Act energyNational context · EPA signs greenhouse-gas endangerment finding · 2009-12-07GHG findingNational context · Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill · 2010-04-20Deepwater HorizonNational context · Fukushima accident prompts U.S. nuclear safety response · 2011-03-11Fukushima safetyNational context · Global demand and Middle East unrest pressure oil prices · 2011-04-112011 oil pressuresNational context · Hurricane Sandy disrupts electricity and fuel distribution · 2012-10-29Hurricane SandyNational context · Polar vortex strains gas supplies and power systems · 2014-01-07Polar vortexNational context · Oil supply growth and OPEC decision deepen price collapse · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseSouth Carolina · Strong winds damage trees and power lines around Florence and Darlington · 2015-03-05Florence–Darlington windsNational context · Clean Power Plan announced; implementation later stayed · 2015-08-03Clean Power PlanSouth Carolina · Storms damage Florence power lines and airport buildings · 2015-08-05Florence airport stormSouth Carolina · Historic South Carolina flooding displaces residents and disrupts roads and homes · 2015-10-01South Carolina floodsSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-22: Temporary freight requirements for flood response · 2015-10-02Executive Order 2015-22South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-29: Separate freight and driver-hour periods for flood recovery · 2015-10-30Executive Order 2015-29National context · Congress lifts longstanding crude-oil export restrictions · 2015-12-18Crude export rulesNational context · First LNG export cargo from the Lower 48 · 2016-02-24Lower 48 LNG exportsNational context · Shale development transforms U.S. oil supply · 2016-03-15Shale expansionNational context · Natural gas overtakes coal in annual electricity generation · 2016-12-31Gas overtakes coalNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · Attacks on Saudi oil facilities interrupt global supply · 2019-09-14Saudi oil attacksNational context · United States becomes an annual net total energy exporter · 2019-12-31Net energy exporterNational context · COVID-19 sharply reduces energy demand · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Expiring WTI oil futures settle below zero · 2020-04-20Negative WTI futuresNational context · Western heat wave leads to California rotating outages · 2020-08-14California outagesNational context · OPEC+ supply cuts help rebalance the pandemic oil market · 2020-09-23OPEC+ supply cutsNational context · Severe winter weather disrupts Texas and regional energy systems · 2021-02-08Winter Storm UriNational context · Cyberattack interrupts Colonial Pipeline fuel deliveries · 2021-05-07Colonial PipelineNational context · Infrastructure law funds grid and energy projects · 2021-11-15Infrastructure energyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Large Strategic Petroleum Reserve release announced · 2022-03-31SPR releaseNational context · Freeport LNG fire shuts a major export terminal · 2022-06-08Freeport LNG outageNational context · Inflation Reduction Act expands energy incentives · 2022-08-16IRA energy incentivesNational context · Winter Storm Elliott disrupts gas and power supplies · 2022-12-21Winter Storm ElliottNational context · Renewables exceed coal in annual electric power sector generation · 2022-12-31Renewables pass coalNational context · Vogtle expansion adds new nuclear generation · 2023-07-31Vogtle nuclear unitsNational context · Red Sea attacks reroute oil and gas shipping · 2024-02-01Red Sea shippingNational context · EPA finalizes new power-plant greenhouse-gas rules · 2024-04-25Power-plant GHG ruleNational context · FERC adopts long-term regional transmission planning rule · 2024-05-13Transmission planningNational context · DOE report documents growing data-center electricity demand · 2024-12-20Data-center demandNational context · President declares energy emergency and directs policy changes · 2025-01-20Energy emergencyNational context · U.S. tariff announcement changes energy trade context · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · EPA proposes repeal of power-sector greenhouse-gas rules · 2025-06-11Power-rule proposalNational context · Tax law accelerates several energy-credit expirations · 2025-07-04Energy tax changesNational context · EPA finalizes endangerment and vehicle GHG standard rescission · 2026-02-12Vehicle GHG repealNational context · EPA announces repeal of 2024 power-plant air-toxics amendments · 2026-02-20Air-toxics amendmentsNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shockNational context · IEA members agree to emergency oil-stock release · 2026-03-11Emergency oil stocksNational context · FERC and NERC report improved winter grid preparedness · 2026-09-10Winter grid review● South Carolina Legislature · 6● U.S. Congress · South Carolina delegation · 1◆ Governor · 7■ South Carolina agencies · 12005-08-012026-09-30

15 of 15 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 15 date markers shown. 53 major events shown separately.

South Carolina · 2024: 14.23¢/kWh · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside South Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Carolina Residential electricity price · source units
PeriodSouth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
202414.23¢/kWh#29 of 5016.48¢/kWh
202313.68¢/kWh#31 of 50Not available
202213.59¢/kWh#29 of 50Not available
202112.86¢/kWh#23 of 50Not available
202012.78¢/kWh#21 of 50Not available
201912.99¢/kWh#18 of 50Not available
201812.44¢/kWh#23 of 50Not available
201713.02¢/kWh#19 of 50Not available
201612.65¢/kWh#19 of 50Not available
201512.57¢/kWh#19 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Carolina · state comparison

Household energy prices

Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.

South Carolina · 202414.23¢/kWh
South Carolina rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential electricity price

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside South Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Residential electricity price history in South Carolina11.83¢/kWh14.46¢/kWh17.09¢/kWh20152024
2024 · South Carolina: 14.23¢/kWh · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Residential electricity price history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
201512.57¢/kWh
201612.65¢/kWh
201713.02¢/kWh
201812.44¢/kWh
201912.99¢/kWh
202012.78¢/kWh
202112.86¢/kWh
202213.59¢/kWh
202313.68¢/kWh
202414.23¢/kWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 14.23¢/kWh2024 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii42.86¢/kWh—
#2California31.97¢/kWh—
#3Massachusetts29.35¢/kWh—
#4Connecticut28.75¢/kWh—
#5Rhode Island28.65¢/kWh—
#6Alaska24.82¢/kWh—
#7New York24.43¢/kWh—
#8Maine24.29¢/kWh—
#9New Hampshire23.4¢/kWh—
#10Vermont21.9¢/kWh—
#11New Jersey19.34¢/kWh—
#12Michigan19.3¢/kWh—
#13Maryland17.86¢/kWh—
#14Pennsylvania17.77¢/kWh—
#15Wisconsin17.18¢/kWh—
#16Delaware16.57¢/kWh—
#17Ohio15.99¢/kWh—
#18Illinois15.87¢/kWh—
#19Minnesota15.45¢/kWh—
#20Alabama15.18¢/kWh—
#21West Virginia15.07¢/kWh—
#22Nevada15¢/kWh—
#23Texas14.94¢/kWh—
#24Colorado14.92¢/kWh—
#25Arizona14.91¢/kWh—
#26Indiana14.77¢/kWh—
#27Oregon14.7¢/kWh—
#28Virginia14.41¢/kWh—
#29South Carolina · your comparison14.23¢/kWh—
#30New Mexico14.2¢/kWh—
#31Kansas14.15¢/kWh—
#32Florida14.14¢/kWh—
#33North Carolina14.13¢/kWh—
#34Georgia14.08¢/kWh—
#35Iowa13.4¢/kWh—
#36Mississippi13.39¢/kWh—
#37Missouri12.91¢/kWh—
#38South Dakota12.86¢/kWh—
#39Kentucky12.79¢/kWh—
#40Montana12.66¢/kWh—
#41Wyoming12.47¢/kWh—
#42Tennessee12.42¢/kWh—
#43Arkansas12.32¢/kWh—
#44Oklahoma12.24¢/kWh—
#45Utah12.22¢/kWh—
#46Washington11.9¢/kWh—
#47Louisiana11.73¢/kWh—
#48Nebraska11.53¢/kWh—
#49Idaho11.52¢/kWh—
#50North Dakota11.51¢/kWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price

$3.78/galWeek of August 31, 2026

Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Lower Atlantic region, including taxes. The region contains Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Recent EIA observations

Prior week
$3.785/gal
Weekly change
-0.2¢
One year earlier
$2.912/gal
Change from one year earlier
+87.1¢
Method and limitations

FactVote uses EIA’s Lower Atlantic series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes South Carolina. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.

  • EIA does not publish a current South Carolina statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Lower Atlantic regional estimate should not be read as South Carolina’s statewide average.
  • The regional average combines Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia, and does not represent the price at every station or in every South Carolina community.
  • Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
  • Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
South Carolina · state comparison

What are households paying for electricity?

Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.

South Carolina · 2024$149.51
South Carolina rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Average monthly residential electricity bill

State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.

Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Average monthly residential electricity bill history in South Carolina$100.95$128.39$155.8420102024
2024 · South Carolina: $149.51 · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Average monthly residential electricity bill history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2010$137.59
2011$135.01
2012$131.64
2013$134.86
2014$147.74
2015$144.04
2016$146.09
2017$140.8
2018$144.2
2019$144.73
2020$138.16
2021$138.65
2022$147.87
2023$139.91
2024$149.51

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $149.512024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$212.12—
#2Connecticut$199.66—
#3Alabama$173.5—
#4Massachusetts$167.2—
#5Maryland$165.87—
#6Texas$163.72—
#7Rhode Island$162.4—
#8California$160.86—
#9Arizona$160.24—
#10Florida$156.09—
#11Mississippi$154.83—
#12West Virginia$154.76—
#13Georgia$151.25—
#14Delaware$150.87—
#15South Carolina · your comparison$149.51—
#16Virginia$148.77—
#17Pennsylvania$145.17—
#18New Hampshire$144.87—
#19Alaska$143.54—
#20North Carolina$143.5—
#21Tennessee$143.32—
#22Louisiana$140.96—
#23New York$139.53—
#24Nevada$139.39—
#25Ohio$135.16—
#26Kentucky$133.81—
#27Maine$133.6—
#28Indiana$133.06—
#29Oklahoma$132.05—
#30Oregon$129.62—
#31Missouri$129.18—
#32Arkansas$129.13—
#33New Jersey$128.13—
#34South Dakota$127.81—
#35Vermont$125.66—
#36Kansas$123.9—
#37Michigan$119.31—
#38North Dakota$118.38—
#39Washington$113.68—
#40Iowa$111.54—
#41Wisconsin$110.87—
#42Nebraska$110.28—
#43Minnesota$110.06—
#44Illinois$109.99—
#45Idaho$108.73—
#46Montana$107.91—
#47Wyoming$107.65—
#48Colorado$100.57—
#49Utah$94.57—
#50New Mexico$92.88—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

What generates South Carolina electricity?

Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.

South Carolina · 2024101.1 TWh
South Carolina rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total electricity generation

For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.

Generation is electricity produced inside South Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Total electricity generation history in South Carolina91.9 TWh97.1 TWh102.3 TWh20152024
2024 · South Carolina: 101.1 TWh · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Total electricity generation history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
201596.5 TWh
201697 TWh
201793.1 TWh
201899.4 TWh
2019100.1 TWh
202098.5 TWh
202198.4 TWh
202298.7 TWh
2023100.9 TWh
2024101.1 TWh

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 101.1 TWh2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas571.5 TWh—
#2Florida270.7 TWh—
#3California245.9 TWh—
#4Pennsylvania242.5 TWh—
#5Illinois186.7 TWh—
#6Ohio143.3 TWh—
#7Alabama142.9 TWh—
#8Georgia140.4 TWh—
#9North Carolina135.9 TWh—
#10New York133.5 TWh—
#11Michigan124.5 TWh—
#12Arizona121.5 TWh—
#13Virginia103.7 TWh—
#14Washington103 TWh—
#15South Carolina · your comparison101.1 TWh—
#16Louisiana100 TWh—
#17Indiana97.4 TWh—
#18Oklahoma94.3 TWh—
#19Mississippi77.4 TWh—
#20Tennessee76.3 TWh—
#21Iowa70.9 TWh—
#22Missouri67.6 TWh—
#23Kentucky67.1 TWh—
#24Wisconsin65.6 TWh—
#25Oregon65.3 TWh—
#26New Jersey63.6 TWh—
#27Arkansas62.1 TWh—
#28Colorado60.8 TWh—
#29Minnesota59 TWh—
#30Kansas57.9 TWh—
#31West Virginia50.7 TWh—
#32Nevada47.6 TWh—
#33Connecticut46.2 TWh—
#34North Dakota42.6 TWh—
#35Wyoming40.7 TWh—
#36New Mexico40.5 TWh—
#37Nebraska37.3 TWh—
#38Maryland36.9 TWh—
#39Utah36.1 TWh—
#40Montana27 TWh—
#41Massachusetts25 TWh—
#42South Dakota20.9 TWh—
#43Idaho20.3 TWh—
#44New Hampshire17.3 TWh—
#45Maine15.7 TWh—
#46Hawaii10.7 TWh—
#47Rhode Island10.1 TWh—
#48Alaska6.7 TWh—
#49Delaware5 TWh—
#50Vermont2.5 TWh—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation

56%2024

Share of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Selected generation shares

Nuclear
56%
Natural gas
22%
Coal
17%
Renewables
4%
Method and limitations

South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff energy-risk assessment using 2024 generation-mix data.

  • The shares are rounded and the selected categories omit the report's 1% other category.
  • In-state generation is not the same as electricity consumed in South Carolina because power crosses state lines.
South Carolina · state comparison

Affordability, reliability, emissions, and demand

Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.

South Carolina · 20243,155 min/year
South Carolina rank#1among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Outage minutes per customer · all events

EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.

Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Outage minutes per customer · all events history in South Carolina-278 min/year1,662.4 min/year3,602.8 min/year20232024
2024 · South Carolina: 3,155 min/year · Rank #1 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Outage minutes per customer · all events history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2023169.8 min/year
20243,155 min/year

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 3,155 min/year2024 · Rank #1 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1South Carolina · your comparison3,155 min/year—
#2Maine1,748.6 min/year—
#3Texas1,614.3 min/year—
#4North Carolina1,518.1 min/year—
#5Florida1,487.6 min/year—
#6Georgia1,208.1 min/year—
#7West Virginia1,165.5 min/year—
#8Virginia962.1 min/year—
#9Vermont895.8 min/year—
#10New Hampshire735.5 min/year—
#11Nebraska697.8 min/year—
#12Washington643.5 min/year—
#13Louisiana630.6 min/year—
#14Mississippi607.3 min/year—
#15Oregon579.3 min/year—
#16Kentucky537.7 min/year—
#17Arkansas527.8 min/year—
#18Ohio511 min/year—
#19Michigan481.7 min/year—
#20New York477.3 min/year—
#21Hawaii382.6 min/year—
#22Pennsylvania353.1 min/year—
#23Montana341.7 min/year—
#24Alaska323.2 min/year—
#25Indiana310 min/year—
#26Wisconsin296.8 min/year—
#27Kansas289.8 min/year—
#28Tennessee289.3 min/year—
#29California285 min/year—
#30New Mexico272.6 min/year—
#31Colorado257 min/year—
#32Minnesota222.4 min/year—
#33Oklahoma220.7 min/year—
#34Missouri212.6 min/year—
#35Idaho204.4 min/year—
#36Iowa200.3 min/year—
#37Alabama197.7 min/year—
#38New Jersey173.3 min/year—
#39Nevada158.9 min/year—
#40Illinois158 min/year—
#41Connecticut152.8 min/year—
#42Wyoming137.8 min/year—
#43Maryland118.1 min/year—
#44Delaware117.9 min/year—
#45Utah115.4 min/year—
#46Rhode Island104.3 min/year—
#47Massachusetts103.7 min/year—
#48North Dakota102.7 min/year—
#49South Dakota85.6 min/year—
#50Arizona83.6 min/year—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Who uses energy?

Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.

South Carolina · 2024370.7 trillion Btu
South Carolina rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Residential energy consumption

Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).

2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 370.7 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas1,514 trillion Btu—
#2Florida1,183.3 trillion Btu—
#3California1,147.1 trillion Btu—
#4New York968.3 trillion Btu—
#5Pennsylvania819.3 trillion Btu—
#6Illinois817.1 trillion Btu—
#7Ohio767.4 trillion Btu—
#8Georgia717.1 trillion Btu—
#9North Carolina662.2 trillion Btu—
#10Michigan661.4 trillion Btu—
#11New Jersey550.1 trillion Btu—
#12Virginia526 trillion Btu—
#13Tennessee492 trillion Btu—
#14Indiana475.6 trillion Btu—
#15Missouri459 trillion Btu—
#16Arizona413.7 trillion Btu—
#17Massachusetts379 trillion Btu—
#18Wisconsin375.9 trillion Btu—
#19South Carolina · your comparison370.7 trillion Btu—
#20Maryland357.2 trillion Btu—
#21Minnesota346.2 trillion Btu—
#22Alabama331.6 trillion Btu—
#23Washington330.2 trillion Btu—
#24Kentucky319 trillion Btu—
#25Colorado311.9 trillion Btu—
#26Louisiana282.6 trillion Btu—
#27Connecticut235.3 trillion Btu—
#28Oklahoma231 trillion Btu—
#29Arkansas209.5 trillion Btu—
#30Utah190.7 trillion Btu—
#31Mississippi179.7 trillion Btu—
#32Oregon173.1 trillion Btu—
#33Kansas166.4 trillion Btu—
#34Iowa162 trillion Btu—
#35Nevada153.3 trillion Btu—
#36West Virginia141 trillion Btu—
#37Nebraska128.9 trillion Btu—
#38Idaho111.2 trillion Btu—
#39New Mexico98.1 trillion Btu—
#40New Hampshire91.8 trillion Btu—
#41Maine80.5 trillion Btu—
#42Montana73.9 trillion Btu—
#43Delaware62.6 trillion Btu—
#44North Dakota61.3 trillion Btu—
#45Rhode Island61 trillion Btu—
#46Alaska49.1 trillion Btu—
#47Wyoming45.5 trillion Btu—
#48South Dakota44.2 trillion Btu—
#49Vermont32.7 trillion Btu—
#50Hawaii29.5 trillion Btu—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Energy-related carbon emissions

Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.

South Carolina · 202470.81 Mt CO₂
South Carolina rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total energy-related CO₂ emissions

Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 70.81 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas679.93 Mt CO₂—
#2California315.98 Mt CO₂—
#3Florida230.85 Mt CO₂—
#4Pennsylvania201.57 Mt CO₂—
#5Louisiana186.89 Mt CO₂—
#6Ohio186.34 Mt CO₂—
#7Illinois163.98 Mt CO₂—
#8New York163.69 Mt CO₂—
#9Indiana152.3 Mt CO₂—
#10Michigan143.11 Mt CO₂—
#11Georgia127.83 Mt CO₂—
#12North Carolina119.07 Mt CO₂—
#13Kentucky106.87 Mt CO₂—
#14Alabama104.32 Mt CO₂—
#15Virginia99.24 Mt CO₂—
#16Missouri98.03 Mt CO₂—
#17Tennessee90.46 Mt CO₂—
#18Oklahoma88.56 Mt CO₂—
#19New Jersey87.84 Mt CO₂—
#20Wisconsin85.12 Mt CO₂—
#21Arizona82.2 Mt CO₂—
#22Colorado79.57 Mt CO₂—
#23Minnesota77.89 Mt CO₂—
#24Washington73.81 Mt CO₂—
#25West Virginia72.28 Mt CO₂—
#26South Carolina · your comparison70.81 Mt CO₂—
#27Iowa65.23 Mt CO₂—
#28Mississippi64.75 Mt CO₂—
#29Arkansas58.42 Mt CO₂—
#30Massachusetts58.07 Mt CO₂—
#31North Dakota55.15 Mt CO₂—
#32Kansas55.09 Mt CO₂—
#33Utah55.03 Mt CO₂—
#34Wyoming50 Mt CO₂—
#35Maryland48.77 Mt CO₂—
#36Alaska44.01 Mt CO₂—
#37Nebraska43.54 Mt CO₂—
#38New Mexico41.63 Mt CO₂—
#39Nevada39.28 Mt CO₂—
#40Oregon38.94 Mt CO₂—
#41Connecticut37.09 Mt CO₂—
#42Montana27.16 Mt CO₂—
#43Idaho21.11 Mt CO₂—
#44Hawaii17.96 Mt CO₂—
#45Maine15.99 Mt CO₂—
#46South Dakota15.11 Mt CO₂—
#47New Hampshire13.6 Mt CO₂—
#48Delaware11.52 Mt CO₂—
#49Rhode Island11.05 Mt CO₂—
#50Vermont5.36 Mt CO₂—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

17 statements from 11 candidates

2026 South Carolina Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Walid Hakim

1 statement

Green · Governor · SC

Energy & electricity

Complementing this effort, the state would introduce a fleet of solar powered, no cost public buses to transport citizens to and from work. This program would be designed to benefit both employers and employees; reducing parking needs, cutting road congestion, and saving South Carolina hundreds of m…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Complementing this effort, the state would introduce a fleet of solar powered, no cost public buses to transport citizens to and from work. This program would be designed to benefit both employers and employees; reducing parking needs, cutting road congestion, and saving South Carolina hundreds of millions of dollars every year in infrastructure and maintenance costs. Through these innovations, Hakim envisions a South Carolina that leads the South in sustainable growth, smart design, and efficient mobility. We need a state built for the people, not for traffic.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Carolina U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

2026 South Carolina U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Joe Wilson

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · SC

Energy & electricity

Expand domestic energy production under standards the campaign describes as responsible.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Domestic Energy Production

Candidate campaign source

Expand domestic energy production under standards the campaign describes as responsible.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Joe Wilson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Zyon Khalifa

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · SC

Energy & electricity

Transition to Renewable Energy: Advocating for policies that promote solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources to reduce carbon emissions.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Transition to Renewable Energy: Advocating for policies that promote solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources to reduce carbon emissions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Zyon Khalifa — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

59 matching sponsorships or proposals · 46 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 78 · D–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Beth E. Bernstein
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3659

SC Energy Freedom Act

Jun 5, 2019 · Enacted

Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises utility procurement from qualifying small power producers through standard offers and power-purchase agreements, with commission review of avoided costs and contract terms.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 62 (2019-06-05). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(12) 'Renewable energy facility' means a facility for the production of electrical energy that utilizes a renewable generation resource as defined in Section 58-39-120(F), that is placed in service after the effective date of this chapter, and for which costs are not included in an electrical utility's rates. […] Section 58-41-20. (A) As soon as is practicable after the effective date of this chapter, the commission shall open a docket for the purpose of establishing each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within six months after the effective date of this chapter, and at least once every twenty-four months thereafter, the commission shall approve each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within such proceeding the commission shall approve one or more standard form power purchase agreements for use for qualifying small power production facilities not eligible for the standard offer. Such power purchase agreements shall contain provisions, including, but not limited to, provisions for force majeure, indemnification, choice of venue, and confidentiality provisions and other such terms, but shall not be determinative of price or length of the power purchase agreement. The commission may approve multiple form power purchase agreements to accommodate various generation technologies and other project-specific characteristics. This provision shall not restrict the right of parties to enter into power purchase agreements with terms that differ from the commission-approved form(s). Any decisions by the commission shall be just and reasonable to the ratepayers of the electrical utility, in the public interest, consistent with PURPA and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's implementing regulations and orders, and nondiscriminatory to small power producers; and shall strive to reduce the risk placed on the using and consuming public.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Taylor

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 86 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Bill Taylor
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3309

Electrical Utilities

May 19, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brandon Newton

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 45 · R–SC

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brandon Newton
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3309

Electrical Utilities

May 19, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3194

Santee Cooper

Jun 22, 2021 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires Public Service Commission review of Santee Cooper’s generation resource plans and makes new major generating-facility certificates depend on findings about cost, risk, alternatives, and consistency with its approved capacity plan. Plan approval is distinct from construction approval and does not establish actual output.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 90 (2021-06-22). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The term 'major utility facility' means: (a) electric generating plant and associated facilities designed for, or capable of, operation at a capacity of more than seventy-five megawatts. […] SECTION 20. Article 3, Chapter 33, Title 58 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding: "Section 58-33-180. (A)(1) In addition to the requirements of Articles 1, 3, 5, and 7 of Chapter 33, Title 58, a certificate for the construction of a major utility facility shall be granted only if the Public Service Authority demonstrates and proves by a preponderance of the evidence and the commission finds: (a) the construction of a major utility facility constitutes a more cost-effective means for serving direct serve and wholesale customers than other feasibly available long-term power supply alternatives and provides less ratepayer risk while maintaining safe and reliable electric service than other feasibly available long-term power supply alternatives; and (b) energy efficiency measures; demand-side management; renewable energy resource generation; available long-term power supply alternatives, or any combination thereof, would not establish or maintain a more cost-effective and reliable generation system and that the construction and operation of the facility is in the public interest. (2) Available long-term power supply alternatives may include, but are not limited to, power purchase agreements, competitive procurement of renewable energy, joint dispatch agreements, market purchases from an existing regional transmission organization, joining or creating a new regional transmission organization, using best available technology for energy generation, transmission, storage and distribution, or any combination thereof. (3) The commission shall consider any previous analysis performed pursuant to Section 58-37-40 in acting upon any petition by the Public Service Authority pursuant to this section. The commission shall also take into account the Public Service Authority's resource and fuel diversity, reasonably anticipated future operating costs, arrangements with other electric utilities for interchange of power, pooling of plants, purchase of power and other alternative methods for providing reliable, efficient, and economical electric service. (B) The Public Service Authority shall file an estimate of construction costs in such detail as the commission may require. No certificate shall be granted unless the commission has approved the estimated construction costs and made a finding that construction will be consistent with the Authority's commission-approved plan for expansion of electric generating capacity. […] "Section 58-37-40. (A) Electrical utilities, electric cooperatives, municipally owned electric utilities, and the South Carolina Public Service Authority must each prepare an integrated resource plan. An integrated resource plan must be prepared and submitted at least every three years. Nothing in this section may be construed as requiring interstate natural gas companies whose rates and services are regulated only by the federal government or gas utilities subject to the jurisdiction of the commission to prepare and submit an integrated resource plan. […] (3) The South Carolina Public Service Authority shall submit its integrated resource plan to the commission. The Public Service Authority shall develop a public process allowing for input from all stakeholders prior to submitting the integrated resource plan. The integrated resource plan must be developed in consultation with the electric cooperatives and municipally owned electric utilities purchasing power and energy from the Public Service Authority and consider any feedback provided by retail customers and shall include the effect of demand-side management activities of the electric cooperatives and municipally owned electric utilities that directly purchase power and energy from the Public Service Authority or sell power and energy generated by the Public Service Authority. The integrated resource plan must be posted on the commission's website and on the Public Service Authority's website. (4)(a) In addition to the requirements of Section 58-37-40(B), the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan shall include an analysis of long-term power supply alternatives and enumerate the cost of various resource portfolios over various study periods including a twenty-year study period and, by comparison on a net present value basis, identify the most cost-effective and least ratepayer-risk resource portfolio to meet the Public Service Authority's total capacity and energy requirements while maintaining safe and reliable electric service. […] (C)(1) The commission shall have a proceeding to review each electrical utility subject to subsection (A)(1) and the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan. As part of the integrated resource plan filing, the commission shall allow intervention by interested parties. The commission shall establish a procedural schedule to permit reasonable discovery after an integrated resource plan is filed in order to assist parties in obtaining evidence concerning the integrated resource plan, including the reasonableness and prudence of the plan and alternatives to the plan raised by intervening parties. No later than three hundred days after an electrical utility files an integrated resource plan, the commission shall issue a final order approving, modifying, or denying the plan filed by the electrical utility or the Public Service Authority. (2) The commission shall approve an electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan if the commission determines that the proposed integrated resource plan represents the most reasonable and prudent means of meeting the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's energy and capacity needs as of the time the plan is reviewed. To determine whether the integrated resource plan is the most reasonable and prudent means of meeting energy and capacity needs, the commission, in its discretion, shall consider whether the plan appropriately balances the following factors: (a) resource adequacy and capacity to serve anticipated peak electrical load, and applicable planning reserve margins; (b) consumer affordability and least cost; (c) compliance with applicable state and federal environmental regulations; (d) power supply reliability; (e) commodity price risks; (f) diversity of generation supply; and (g) other foreseeable conditions that the commission determines to be for the public's interest. (3) If the commission modifies or rejects an electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan, the electrical utility or the Public Service Authority, within sixty days after the date of the final order, shall submit a revised plan addressing concerns identified by the commission and incorporating commission-mandated revisions to the integrated resource plan to the commission for approval. Within sixty days of the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's revised filing, the Office of Regulatory Staff shall review the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's revised plan and submit a report to the commission assessing the sufficiency of the revised filing. Other parties to the integrated resource plan proceeding also may submit comments. No later than sixty days after the Office of Regulatory Staff report is filed with the commission, the commission at its discretion may determine whether to accept the revised integrated resource plan or to mandate further remedies that the commission deems appropriate. (4) The submission, review, and acceptance of an integrated resource plan by the commission, or the inclusion of any specific resource or experience in an accepted integrated resource plan, shall not be determinative of the reasonableness or prudence of the acquisition or construction of any resource or the making of any expenditure. An electrical utility shall retain the burden of proof to show that all of its investments and expenditures are reasonable and prudent when seeking cost recovery in rates.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3659

SC Energy Freedom Act

Jun 5, 2019 · Enacted

Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises utility procurement from qualifying small power producers through standard offers and power-purchase agreements, with commission review of avoided costs and contract terms.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 62 (2019-06-05). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(12) 'Renewable energy facility' means a facility for the production of electrical energy that utilizes a renewable generation resource as defined in Section 58-39-120(F), that is placed in service after the effective date of this chapter, and for which costs are not included in an electrical utility's rates. […] Section 58-41-20. (A) As soon as is practicable after the effective date of this chapter, the commission shall open a docket for the purpose of establishing each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within six months after the effective date of this chapter, and at least once every twenty-four months thereafter, the commission shall approve each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within such proceeding the commission shall approve one or more standard form power purchase agreements for use for qualifying small power production facilities not eligible for the standard offer. Such power purchase agreements shall contain provisions, including, but not limited to, provisions for force majeure, indemnification, choice of venue, and confidentiality provisions and other such terms, but shall not be determinative of price or length of the power purchase agreement. The commission may approve multiple form power purchase agreements to accommodate various generation technologies and other project-specific characteristics. This provision shall not restrict the right of parties to enter into power purchase agreements with terms that differ from the commission-approved form(s). Any decisions by the commission shall be just and reasonable to the ratepayers of the electrical utility, in the public interest, consistent with PURPA and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's implementing regulations and orders, and nondiscriminatory to small power producers; and shall strive to reduce the risk placed on the using and consuming public.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr.

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 39 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr.
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3309

Electrical Utilities

May 19, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Carl L. Anderson

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 103 · D–SC

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Carl L. Anderson
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3309

Electrical Utilities

May 19, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3659

SC Energy Freedom Act

Jun 5, 2019 · Enacted

Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises utility procurement from qualifying small power producers through standard offers and power-purchase agreements, with commission review of avoided costs and contract terms.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 62 (2019-06-05). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(12) 'Renewable energy facility' means a facility for the production of electrical energy that utilizes a renewable generation resource as defined in Section 58-39-120(F), that is placed in service after the effective date of this chapter, and for which costs are not included in an electrical utility's rates. […] Section 58-41-20. (A) As soon as is practicable after the effective date of this chapter, the commission shall open a docket for the purpose of establishing each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within six months after the effective date of this chapter, and at least once every twenty-four months thereafter, the commission shall approve each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within such proceeding the commission shall approve one or more standard form power purchase agreements for use for qualifying small power production facilities not eligible for the standard offer. Such power purchase agreements shall contain provisions, including, but not limited to, provisions for force majeure, indemnification, choice of venue, and confidentiality provisions and other such terms, but shall not be determinative of price or length of the power purchase agreement. The commission may approve multiple form power purchase agreements to accommodate various generation technologies and other project-specific characteristics. This provision shall not restrict the right of parties to enter into power purchase agreements with terms that differ from the commission-approved form(s). Any decisions by the commission shall be just and reasonable to the ratepayers of the electrical utility, in the public interest, consistent with PURPA and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's implementing regulations and orders, and nondiscriminatory to small power producers; and shall strive to reduce the risk placed on the using and consuming public.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Carla M. Schuessler

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 61 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Carla M. Schuessler
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3309

Electrical Utilities

May 19, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.