Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price14.23¢/kWh2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.767/gal2026-08 · #38 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$149.512024 · #15 of 50 · highest first
South Carolina over time
Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
15 of 15 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 15 date markers shown. 53 major events shown separately.
South Carolina · 2024: 14.23¢/kWh · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside South Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
South Carolina Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
South Carolina · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
South Carolina · 202414.23¢/kWh
South Carolina rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside South Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
South Carolina
2024 · South Carolina: 14.23¢/kWh · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
South Carolina Residential electricity price history
Period
South Carolina
Compare
2015
12.57¢/kWh
2016
12.65¢/kWh
2017
13.02¢/kWh
2018
12.44¢/kWh
2019
12.99¢/kWh
2020
12.78¢/kWh
2021
12.86¢/kWh
2022
13.59¢/kWh
2023
13.68¢/kWh
2024
14.23¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · 14.23¢/kWh2024 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina · your comparison
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's Lower Atlantic region, including taxes. The region contains Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$3.785/gal
Weekly change
-0.2¢
One year earlier
$2.912/gal
Change from one year earlier
+87.1¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA’s Lower Atlantic series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes South Carolina. Changes are calculated from the published August 24, 2026 (prior week), and September 1, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current South Carolina statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This Lower Atlantic regional estimate should not be read as South Carolina’s statewide average.
The regional average combines Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia, and does not represent the price at every station or in every South Carolina community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
South Carolina · 2024$149.51
South Carolina rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
South Carolina
2024 · South Carolina: $149.51 · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
South Carolina Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
South Carolina
Compare
2010
$137.59
2011
$135.01
2012
$131.64
2013
$134.86
2014
$147.74
2015
$144.04
2016
$146.09
2017
$140.8
2018
$144.2
2019
$144.73
2020
$138.16
2021
$138.65
2022
$147.87
2023
$139.91
2024
$149.51
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · $149.512024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina · your comparison
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
South Carolina · 2024101.1 TWh
South Carolina rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside South Carolina, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation; the 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
South Carolina
2024 · South Carolina: 101.1 TWh · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
South Carolina Total electricity generation history
Period
South Carolina
Compare
2015
96.5 TWh
2016
97 TWh
2017
93.1 TWh
2018
99.4 TWh
2019
100.1 TWh
2020
98.5 TWh
2021
98.4 TWh
2022
98.7 TWh
2023
100.9 TWh
2024
101.1 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · 101.1 TWh2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina · your comparison
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
South Carolina · 20243,155 min/year
South Carolina rank#1among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
South Carolina
2024 · South Carolina: 3,155 min/year · Rank #1 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
South Carolina Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
South Carolina
Compare
2023
169.8 min/year
2024
3,155 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · 3,155 min/year2024 · Rank #1 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina · your comparison
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
South Carolina · 2024370.7 trillion Btu
South Carolina rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · 370.7 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina · your comparison
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
South Carolina · 202470.81 Mt CO₂
South Carolina rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · 70.81 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina · your comparison
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
15 of 15 reviewed South Carolina actions · newest first
Mar 26, 2026 · H. 5419 · Motor fuel user fee suspension · Referred to Ways and Means · not enactedSouth Carolina Legislature · H. 5419
Motor fuel user fee suspension
Mar 26, 2026 · Referred to Ways and Means · not enacted
Rep. Marvin “Mark” Smith · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
H. 5419 proposed a 30-day suspension of South Carolina’s gasoline and diesel user fee and road tax. The official record shows committee referral and no enactment.
Referred to House Ways and Means on March 25, 2026. The last listed action is a sponsor addition on March 26; no passage or enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026.
Why this record is included
H. 5419 proposed suspending the gasoline and diesel motor-fuel user fee and road tax for 30 days following approval, then reinstating the statutory rates. It addresses a tax included in South Carolina pump prices. The official history records committee referral and later sponsor additions, with no enactment; the proposal did not establish a tax holiday or lower the measured regional price.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1 would suspend the motor-fuel user fee and road tax for thirty days, then reinstate the rates set by law. Section 2 requires governor approval for effectiveness.
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2025 · S 1757 · Efficient Nuclear Licensing Hearings Act · In CongressU.S. Congress · South Carolina delegation · S 1757
Efficient Nuclear Licensing Hearings Act
May 14, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Tim Scott · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Proposes allowing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to issue specified construction or operating licenses without a hearing when no affected person requests one, generally after 30 days’ notice, and using informal hearing procedures.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(ii) The Commission may, in the absence of a request for a hearing by any person whose interest may be affected, issue a construction permit, an operating license, a combined construction permit and operating license, an amendment to a construction permit, an amendment to an operating license, or an amendment to a combined construction permit and operating license under section 103, 104 b., 104 c., or 185 b. for a facility or a testing facility, without a hearing, but upon thirty days notice and publication once in the Federal Register of its intent to do so. The Commission may dispense with such thirty days notice and publication with respect to any application for an amendment to a construction permit, an amendment to an operating license, or an amendment to a combined construction permit and operating license upon a determination by the Commission that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. (iii) The Commission shall use informal adjudicatory procedures for any hearing held by the Commission pursuant to this subparagraph. ; (B) in subparagraph (B)(iv)— (i) by inserting informal before hearing procedures; and (ii) by striking , whether informal or formal adjudicatory,; and (2) in paragraph (2)(A), in the second sentence, by striking required hearing and inserting hearing held by the Commission under this section. (b) Construction permits and operating licenses Section 185 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2235(b)) is amended by striking After holding a public hearing under section 189 a. (1)(A), and inserting After the thirty days notice and publication period or holding a hearing, as applicable, under section 189 a. (1)(A),. (c) Licensing of uranium enrichment facilities Section 193(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2243(b)) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking on the record; and (B) by inserting if a person whose interest may be affected by such construction and operation has requested a hearing regarding the licensing of the construction and operation of the facility after and 63; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking Such hearing and inserting If a hearing is held under paragraph (1), the hearing. (d) Applicability The amendments made by this section shall apply to all applications and proceedings pending before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on or after the date of enactment of this section.
Henry McMaster signed HB 3309. Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.
Signed By Governor. This records the historical action; current enforceability and implementation are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requires Public Service Commission review of Santee Cooper’s generation resource plans and makes new major generating-facility certificates depend on findings about cost, risk, alternatives, and consistency with its approved capacity plan. Plan approval is distinct from construction approval and does not establish actual output.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 90 (2021-06-22). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) The term 'major utility facility' means: (a) electric generating plant and associated facilities designed for, or capable of, operation at a capacity of more than seventy-five megawatts. […] SECTION 20. Article 3, Chapter 33, Title 58 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding: "Section 58-33-180. (A)(1) In addition to the requirements of Articles 1, 3, 5, and 7 of Chapter 33, Title 58, a certificate for the construction of a major utility facility shall be granted only if the Public Service Authority demonstrates and proves by a preponderance of the evidence and the commission finds: (a) the construction of a major utility facility constitutes a more cost-effective means for serving direct serve and wholesale customers than other feasibly available long-term power supply alternatives and provides less ratepayer risk while maintaining safe and reliable electric service than other feasibly available long-term power supply alternatives; and (b) energy efficiency measures; demand-side management; renewable energy resource generation; available long-term power supply alternatives, or any combination thereof, would not establish or maintain a more cost-effective and reliable generation system and that the construction and operation of the facility is in the public interest. (2) Available long-term power supply alternatives may include, but are not limited to, power purchase agreements, competitive procurement of renewable energy, joint dispatch agreements, market purchases from an existing regional transmission organization, joining or creating a new regional transmission organization, using best available technology for energy generation, transmission, storage and distribution, or any combination thereof. (3) The commission shall consider any previous analysis performed pursuant to Section 58-37-40 in acting upon any petition by the Public Service Authority pursuant to this section. The commission shall also take into account the Public Service Authority's resource and fuel diversity, reasonably anticipated future operating costs, arrangements with other electric utilities for interchange of power, pooling of plants, purchase of power and other alternative methods for providing reliable, efficient, and economical electric service. (B) The Public Service Authority shall file an estimate of construction costs in such detail as the commission may require. No certificate shall be granted unless the commission has approved the estimated construction costs and made a finding that construction will be consistent with the Authority's commission-approved plan for expansion of electric generating capacity. […] "Section 58-37-40. (A) Electrical utilities, electric cooperatives, municipally owned electric utilities, and the South Carolina Public Service Authority must each prepare an integrated resource plan. An integrated resource plan must be prepared and submitted at least every three years. Nothing in this section may be construed as requiring interstate natural gas companies whose rates and services are regulated only by the federal government or gas utilities subject to the jurisdiction of the commission to prepare and submit an integrated resource plan. […] (3) The South Carolina Public Service Authority shall submit its integrated resource plan to the commission. The Public Service Authority shall develop a public process allowing for input from all stakeholders prior to submitting the integrated resource plan. The integrated resource plan must be developed in consultation with the electric cooperatives and municipally owned electric utilities purchasing power and energy from the Public Service Authority and consider any feedback provided by retail customers and shall include the effect of demand-side management activities of the electric cooperatives and municipally owned electric utilities that directly purchase power and energy from the Public Service Authority or sell power and energy generated by the Public Service Authority. The integrated resource plan must be posted on the commission's website and on the Public Service Authority's website. (4)(a) In addition to the requirements of Section 58-37-40(B), the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan shall include an analysis of long-term power supply alternatives and enumerate the cost of various resource portfolios over various study periods including a twenty-year study period and, by comparison on a net present value basis, identify the most cost-effective and least ratepayer-risk resource portfolio to meet the Public Service Authority's total capacity and energy requirements while maintaining safe and reliable electric service. […] (C)(1) The commission shall have a proceeding to review each electrical utility subject to subsection (A)(1) and the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan. As part of the integrated resource plan filing, the commission shall allow intervention by interested parties. The commission shall establish a procedural schedule to permit reasonable discovery after an integrated resource plan is filed in order to assist parties in obtaining evidence concerning the integrated resource plan, including the reasonableness and prudence of the plan and alternatives to the plan raised by intervening parties. No later than three hundred days after an electrical utility files an integrated resource plan, the commission shall issue a final order approving, modifying, or denying the plan filed by the electrical utility or the Public Service Authority. (2) The commission shall approve an electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan if the commission determines that the proposed integrated resource plan represents the most reasonable and prudent means of meeting the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's energy and capacity needs as of the time the plan is reviewed. To determine whether the integrated resource plan is the most reasonable and prudent means of meeting energy and capacity needs, the commission, in its discretion, shall consider whether the plan appropriately balances the following factors: (a) resource adequacy and capacity to serve anticipated peak electrical load, and applicable planning reserve margins; (b) consumer affordability and least cost; (c) compliance with applicable state and federal environmental regulations; (d) power supply reliability; (e) commodity price risks; (f) diversity of generation supply; and (g) other foreseeable conditions that the commission determines to be for the public's interest. (3) If the commission modifies or rejects an electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan, the electrical utility or the Public Service Authority, within sixty days after the date of the final order, shall submit a revised plan addressing concerns identified by the commission and incorporating commission-mandated revisions to the integrated resource plan to the commission for approval. Within sixty days of the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's revised filing, the Office of Regulatory Staff shall review the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's revised plan and submit a report to the commission assessing the sufficiency of the revised filing. Other parties to the integrated resource plan proceeding also may submit comments. No later than sixty days after the Office of Regulatory Staff report is filed with the commission, the commission at its discretion may determine whether to accept the revised integrated resource plan or to mandate further remedies that the commission deems appropriate. (4) The submission, review, and acceptance of an integrated resource plan by the commission, or the inclusion of any specific resource or experience in an accepted integrated resource plan, shall not be determinative of the reasonableness or prudence of the acquisition or construction of any resource or the making of any expenditure. An electrical utility shall retain the burden of proof to show that all of its investments and expenditures are reasonable and prudent when seeking cost recovery in rates.
Henry McMaster signed HB 3194. Requires Public Service Commission review of Santee Cooper’s generation resource plans and makes new major generating-facility certificates depend on findings about cost, risk, alternatives, and consistency with its approved capacity plan. Plan approval is distinct from construction approval and does not establish actual output.
Signed By Governor. This records the historical action; current enforceability and implementation are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) The term 'major utility facility' means: (a) electric generating plant and associated facilities designed for, or capable of, operation at a capacity of more than seventy-five megawatts. […] SECTION 20. Article 3, Chapter 33, Title 58 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding: "Section 58-33-180. (A)(1) In addition to the requirements of Articles 1, 3, 5, and 7 of Chapter 33, Title 58, a certificate for the construction of a major utility facility shall be granted only if the Public Service Authority demonstrates and proves by a preponderance of the evidence and the commission finds: (a) the construction of a major utility facility constitutes a more cost-effective means for serving direct serve and wholesale customers than other feasibly available long-term power supply alternatives and provides less ratepayer risk while maintaining safe and reliable electric service than other feasibly available long-term power supply alternatives; and (b) energy efficiency measures; demand-side management; renewable energy resource generation; available long-term power supply alternatives, or any combination thereof, would not establish or maintain a more cost-effective and reliable generation system and that the construction and operation of the facility is in the public interest. (2) Available long-term power supply alternatives may include, but are not limited to, power purchase agreements, competitive procurement of renewable energy, joint dispatch agreements, market purchases from an existing regional transmission organization, joining or creating a new regional transmission organization, using best available technology for energy generation, transmission, storage and distribution, or any combination thereof. (3) The commission shall consider any previous analysis performed pursuant to Section 58-37-40 in acting upon any petition by the Public Service Authority pursuant to this section. The commission shall also take into account the Public Service Authority's resource and fuel diversity, reasonably anticipated future operating costs, arrangements with other electric utilities for interchange of power, pooling of plants, purchase of power and other alternative methods for providing reliable, efficient, and economical electric service. (B) The Public Service Authority shall file an estimate of construction costs in such detail as the commission may require. No certificate shall be granted unless the commission has approved the estimated construction costs and made a finding that construction will be consistent with the Authority's commission-approved plan for expansion of electric generating capacity. […] "Section 58-37-40. (A) Electrical utilities, electric cooperatives, municipally owned electric utilities, and the South Carolina Public Service Authority must each prepare an integrated resource plan. An integrated resource plan must be prepared and submitted at least every three years. Nothing in this section may be construed as requiring interstate natural gas companies whose rates and services are regulated only by the federal government or gas utilities subject to the jurisdiction of the commission to prepare and submit an integrated resource plan. […] (3) The South Carolina Public Service Authority shall submit its integrated resource plan to the commission. The Public Service Authority shall develop a public process allowing for input from all stakeholders prior to submitting the integrated resource plan. The integrated resource plan must be developed in consultation with the electric cooperatives and municipally owned electric utilities purchasing power and energy from the Public Service Authority and consider any feedback provided by retail customers and shall include the effect of demand-side management activities of the electric cooperatives and municipally owned electric utilities that directly purchase power and energy from the Public Service Authority or sell power and energy generated by the Public Service Authority. The integrated resource plan must be posted on the commission's website and on the Public Service Authority's website. (4)(a) In addition to the requirements of Section 58-37-40(B), the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan shall include an analysis of long-term power supply alternatives and enumerate the cost of various resource portfolios over various study periods including a twenty-year study period and, by comparison on a net present value basis, identify the most cost-effective and least ratepayer-risk resource portfolio to meet the Public Service Authority's total capacity and energy requirements while maintaining safe and reliable electric service. […] (C)(1) The commission shall have a proceeding to review each electrical utility subject to subsection (A)(1) and the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan. As part of the integrated resource plan filing, the commission shall allow intervention by interested parties. The commission shall establish a procedural schedule to permit reasonable discovery after an integrated resource plan is filed in order to assist parties in obtaining evidence concerning the integrated resource plan, including the reasonableness and prudence of the plan and alternatives to the plan raised by intervening parties. No later than three hundred days after an electrical utility files an integrated resource plan, the commission shall issue a final order approving, modifying, or denying the plan filed by the electrical utility or the Public Service Authority. (2) The commission shall approve an electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan if the commission determines that the proposed integrated resource plan represents the most reasonable and prudent means of meeting the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's energy and capacity needs as of the time the plan is reviewed. To determine whether the integrated resource plan is the most reasonable and prudent means of meeting energy and capacity needs, the commission, in its discretion, shall consider whether the plan appropriately balances the following factors: (a) resource adequacy and capacity to serve anticipated peak electrical load, and applicable planning reserve margins; (b) consumer affordability and least cost; (c) compliance with applicable state and federal environmental regulations; (d) power supply reliability; (e) commodity price risks; (f) diversity of generation supply; and (g) other foreseeable conditions that the commission determines to be for the public's interest. (3) If the commission modifies or rejects an electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan, the electrical utility or the Public Service Authority, within sixty days after the date of the final order, shall submit a revised plan addressing concerns identified by the commission and incorporating commission-mandated revisions to the integrated resource plan to the commission for approval. Within sixty days of the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's revised filing, the Office of Regulatory Staff shall review the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's revised plan and submit a report to the commission assessing the sufficiency of the revised filing. Other parties to the integrated resource plan proceeding also may submit comments. No later than sixty days after the Office of Regulatory Staff report is filed with the commission, the commission at its discretion may determine whether to accept the revised integrated resource plan or to mandate further remedies that the commission deems appropriate. (4) The submission, review, and acceptance of an integrated resource plan by the commission, or the inclusion of any specific resource or experience in an accepted integrated resource plan, shall not be determinative of the reasonableness or prudence of the acquisition or construction of any resource or the making of any expenditure. An electrical utility shall retain the burden of proof to show that all of its investments and expenditures are reasonable and prudent when seeking cost recovery in rates.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified South Carolina officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
17 statements from 11 candidates
2026 South Carolina Governor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Complementing this effort, the state would introduce a fleet of solar powered, no cost public buses to transport citizens to and from work. This program would be designed to benefit both employers and employees; reducing parking needs, cutting road congestion, and saving South Carolina hundreds of m…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure
Candidate campaign source
Complementing this effort, the state would introduce a fleet of solar powered, no cost public buses to transport citizens to and from work. This program would be designed to benefit both employers and employees; reducing parking needs, cutting road congestion, and saving South Carolina hundreds of millions of dollars every year in infrastructure and maintenance costs. Through these innovations, Hakim envisions a South Carolina that leads the South in sustainable growth, smart design, and efficient mobility. We need a state built for the people, not for traffic.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
South Carolina incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
59 matching sponsorships or proposals · 46 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Beth E. Bernstein
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 78 · D–SC
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Beth E. BernsteinSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3659
SC Energy Freedom Act
Jun 5, 2019 · Enacted
Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Revises utility procurement from qualifying small power producers through standard offers and power-purchase agreements, with commission review of avoided costs and contract terms.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 62 (2019-06-05). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(12) 'Renewable energy facility' means a facility for the production of electrical energy that utilizes a renewable generation resource as defined in Section 58-39-120(F), that is placed in service after the effective date of this chapter, and for which costs are not included in an electrical utility's rates. […] Section 58-41-20. (A) As soon as is practicable after the effective date of this chapter, the commission shall open a docket for the purpose of establishing each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within six months after the effective date of this chapter, and at least once every twenty-four months thereafter, the commission shall approve each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within such proceeding the commission shall approve one or more standard form power purchase agreements for use for qualifying small power production facilities not eligible for the standard offer. Such power purchase agreements shall contain provisions, including, but not limited to, provisions for force majeure, indemnification, choice of venue, and confidentiality provisions and other such terms, but shall not be determinative of price or length of the power purchase agreement. The commission may approve multiple form power purchase agreements to accommodate various generation technologies and other project-specific characteristics. This provision shall not restrict the right of parties to enter into power purchase agreements with terms that differ from the commission-approved form(s). Any decisions by the commission shall be just and reasonable to the ratepayers of the electrical utility, in the public interest, consistent with PURPA and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's implementing regulations and orders, and nondiscriminatory to small power producers; and shall strive to reduce the risk placed on the using and consuming public.
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 86 · R–SC
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Bill TaylorSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3309
Electrical Utilities
May 19, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requires Public Service Commission review of Santee Cooper’s generation resource plans and makes new major generating-facility certificates depend on findings about cost, risk, alternatives, and consistency with its approved capacity plan. Plan approval is distinct from construction approval and does not establish actual output.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 90 (2021-06-22). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) The term 'major utility facility' means: (a) electric generating plant and associated facilities designed for, or capable of, operation at a capacity of more than seventy-five megawatts. […] SECTION 20. Article 3, Chapter 33, Title 58 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding: "Section 58-33-180. (A)(1) In addition to the requirements of Articles 1, 3, 5, and 7 of Chapter 33, Title 58, a certificate for the construction of a major utility facility shall be granted only if the Public Service Authority demonstrates and proves by a preponderance of the evidence and the commission finds: (a) the construction of a major utility facility constitutes a more cost-effective means for serving direct serve and wholesale customers than other feasibly available long-term power supply alternatives and provides less ratepayer risk while maintaining safe and reliable electric service than other feasibly available long-term power supply alternatives; and (b) energy efficiency measures; demand-side management; renewable energy resource generation; available long-term power supply alternatives, or any combination thereof, would not establish or maintain a more cost-effective and reliable generation system and that the construction and operation of the facility is in the public interest. (2) Available long-term power supply alternatives may include, but are not limited to, power purchase agreements, competitive procurement of renewable energy, joint dispatch agreements, market purchases from an existing regional transmission organization, joining or creating a new regional transmission organization, using best available technology for energy generation, transmission, storage and distribution, or any combination thereof. (3) The commission shall consider any previous analysis performed pursuant to Section 58-37-40 in acting upon any petition by the Public Service Authority pursuant to this section. The commission shall also take into account the Public Service Authority's resource and fuel diversity, reasonably anticipated future operating costs, arrangements with other electric utilities for interchange of power, pooling of plants, purchase of power and other alternative methods for providing reliable, efficient, and economical electric service. (B) The Public Service Authority shall file an estimate of construction costs in such detail as the commission may require. No certificate shall be granted unless the commission has approved the estimated construction costs and made a finding that construction will be consistent with the Authority's commission-approved plan for expansion of electric generating capacity. […] "Section 58-37-40. (A) Electrical utilities, electric cooperatives, municipally owned electric utilities, and the South Carolina Public Service Authority must each prepare an integrated resource plan. An integrated resource plan must be prepared and submitted at least every three years. Nothing in this section may be construed as requiring interstate natural gas companies whose rates and services are regulated only by the federal government or gas utilities subject to the jurisdiction of the commission to prepare and submit an integrated resource plan. […] (3) The South Carolina Public Service Authority shall submit its integrated resource plan to the commission. The Public Service Authority shall develop a public process allowing for input from all stakeholders prior to submitting the integrated resource plan. The integrated resource plan must be developed in consultation with the electric cooperatives and municipally owned electric utilities purchasing power and energy from the Public Service Authority and consider any feedback provided by retail customers and shall include the effect of demand-side management activities of the electric cooperatives and municipally owned electric utilities that directly purchase power and energy from the Public Service Authority or sell power and energy generated by the Public Service Authority. The integrated resource plan must be posted on the commission's website and on the Public Service Authority's website. (4)(a) In addition to the requirements of Section 58-37-40(B), the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan shall include an analysis of long-term power supply alternatives and enumerate the cost of various resource portfolios over various study periods including a twenty-year study period and, by comparison on a net present value basis, identify the most cost-effective and least ratepayer-risk resource portfolio to meet the Public Service Authority's total capacity and energy requirements while maintaining safe and reliable electric service. […] (C)(1) The commission shall have a proceeding to review each electrical utility subject to subsection (A)(1) and the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan. As part of the integrated resource plan filing, the commission shall allow intervention by interested parties. The commission shall establish a procedural schedule to permit reasonable discovery after an integrated resource plan is filed in order to assist parties in obtaining evidence concerning the integrated resource plan, including the reasonableness and prudence of the plan and alternatives to the plan raised by intervening parties. No later than three hundred days after an electrical utility files an integrated resource plan, the commission shall issue a final order approving, modifying, or denying the plan filed by the electrical utility or the Public Service Authority. (2) The commission shall approve an electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan if the commission determines that the proposed integrated resource plan represents the most reasonable and prudent means of meeting the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's energy and capacity needs as of the time the plan is reviewed. To determine whether the integrated resource plan is the most reasonable and prudent means of meeting energy and capacity needs, the commission, in its discretion, shall consider whether the plan appropriately balances the following factors: (a) resource adequacy and capacity to serve anticipated peak electrical load, and applicable planning reserve margins; (b) consumer affordability and least cost; (c) compliance with applicable state and federal environmental regulations; (d) power supply reliability; (e) commodity price risks; (f) diversity of generation supply; and (g) other foreseeable conditions that the commission determines to be for the public's interest. (3) If the commission modifies or rejects an electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's integrated resource plan, the electrical utility or the Public Service Authority, within sixty days after the date of the final order, shall submit a revised plan addressing concerns identified by the commission and incorporating commission-mandated revisions to the integrated resource plan to the commission for approval. Within sixty days of the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's revised filing, the Office of Regulatory Staff shall review the electrical utility's or the Public Service Authority's revised plan and submit a report to the commission assessing the sufficiency of the revised filing. Other parties to the integrated resource plan proceeding also may submit comments. No later than sixty days after the Office of Regulatory Staff report is filed with the commission, the commission at its discretion may determine whether to accept the revised integrated resource plan or to mandate further remedies that the commission deems appropriate. (4) The submission, review, and acceptance of an integrated resource plan by the commission, or the inclusion of any specific resource or experience in an accepted integrated resource plan, shall not be determinative of the reasonableness or prudence of the acquisition or construction of any resource or the making of any expenditure. An electrical utility shall retain the burden of proof to show that all of its investments and expenditures are reasonable and prudent when seeking cost recovery in rates.
Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Revises utility procurement from qualifying small power producers through standard offers and power-purchase agreements, with commission review of avoided costs and contract terms.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 62 (2019-06-05). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(12) 'Renewable energy facility' means a facility for the production of electrical energy that utilizes a renewable generation resource as defined in Section 58-39-120(F), that is placed in service after the effective date of this chapter, and for which costs are not included in an electrical utility's rates. […] Section 58-41-20. (A) As soon as is practicable after the effective date of this chapter, the commission shall open a docket for the purpose of establishing each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within six months after the effective date of this chapter, and at least once every twenty-four months thereafter, the commission shall approve each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within such proceeding the commission shall approve one or more standard form power purchase agreements for use for qualifying small power production facilities not eligible for the standard offer. Such power purchase agreements shall contain provisions, including, but not limited to, provisions for force majeure, indemnification, choice of venue, and confidentiality provisions and other such terms, but shall not be determinative of price or length of the power purchase agreement. The commission may approve multiple form power purchase agreements to accommodate various generation technologies and other project-specific characteristics. This provision shall not restrict the right of parties to enter into power purchase agreements with terms that differ from the commission-approved form(s). Any decisions by the commission shall be just and reasonable to the ratepayers of the electrical utility, in the public interest, consistent with PURPA and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's implementing regulations and orders, and nondiscriminatory to small power producers; and shall strive to reduce the risk placed on the using and consuming public.
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 39 · R–SC
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr.South Carolina Legislature · HB 3309
Electrical Utilities
May 19, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 103 · D–SC
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Carl L. AndersonSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3309
Electrical Utilities
May 19, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Revises utility procurement from qualifying small power producers through standard offers and power-purchase agreements, with commission review of avoided costs and contract terms.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 62 (2019-06-05). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(12) 'Renewable energy facility' means a facility for the production of electrical energy that utilizes a renewable generation resource as defined in Section 58-39-120(F), that is placed in service after the effective date of this chapter, and for which costs are not included in an electrical utility's rates. […] Section 58-41-20. (A) As soon as is practicable after the effective date of this chapter, the commission shall open a docket for the purpose of establishing each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within six months after the effective date of this chapter, and at least once every twenty-four months thereafter, the commission shall approve each electrical utility's standard offer, avoided cost methodologies, form contract power purchase agreements, commitment to sell forms, and any other terms or conditions necessary to implement this section. Within such proceeding the commission shall approve one or more standard form power purchase agreements for use for qualifying small power production facilities not eligible for the standard offer. Such power purchase agreements shall contain provisions, including, but not limited to, provisions for force majeure, indemnification, choice of venue, and confidentiality provisions and other such terms, but shall not be determinative of price or length of the power purchase agreement. The commission may approve multiple form power purchase agreements to accommodate various generation technologies and other project-specific characteristics. This provision shall not restrict the right of parties to enter into power purchase agreements with terms that differ from the commission-approved form(s). Any decisions by the commission shall be just and reasonable to the ratepayers of the electrical utility, in the public interest, consistent with PURPA and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's implementing regulations and orders, and nondiscriminatory to small power producers; and shall strive to reduce the risk placed on the using and consuming public.
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 61 · R–SC
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Carla M. SchuesslerSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3309
Electrical Utilities
May 19, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. W. Scott Montgomery IV · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Authorizes Santee Cooper to jointly own, finance, construct, operate, and maintain natural-gas generation facilities with Dominion Energy near the former Canadys station in Colleton County. This concerns a potential nonnuclear component of in-state generation; authorization does not establish an operating plant or measured output.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 41 (2025-05-19). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is the portion of South Carolina in-state electricity generation supplied by nuclear power in the Office of Regulatory Staff assessment. Nuclear plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 7. Article 1, Chapter 31, Title 58 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding: Section 58-31-205. (A) The Public Service Authority shall have the power to jointly own, as tenants-in-common or through a limited liability company, with Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc., one or more natural gas-fired generation facilities, and related transmission facilities, to be constructed on a site at or near Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.'s former Canadys coal-fired generation station in Colleton County, the power to plan, finance, acquire, own, operate, and maintain an interest in such plants and facilities necessary or incidental to the generation and transmission of electric power and the power to make plans and enter into such contracts as are necessary or convenient for the planning, financing, acquisition, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of such plants and facilities. However, the Public Service Authority shall own a percentage of such plants and facilities equal to the percentage of the money furnished or the value of property supplied by the Public Service Authority for the acquisition and construction of the plants and facilities. The Public Service Authority shall also own and control a like percentage of the electrical output thereof. (B) The Public Service Authority shall be severally liable in proportion to its ownership share of such plants and facilities acquired pursuant to this section for the acts, omissions, or obligations performed, omitted, or incurred by the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities while acting as the designated agent of the Public Service Authority for the purposes of constructing, operating, or maintaining the plants and facilities, or any of them. However, the Public Service Authority shall not be otherwise liable, jointly or severally, for the acts, omissions, or obligations of other owners of the plants and facilities, nor shall any money or property of the Public Service Authority be credited or otherwise applied to the account of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities, or be charged with any debt, lien, or mortgage as a result of any debt or obligation of the operator or other owners of the plants and facilities.
Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
South Carolina snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to South Carolina, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.