South Carolina · individual fact

South Carolina education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher90.1%2020–2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher42.1%2020–2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher32.1%2020–2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first

South Carolina over time

Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 214.9212217.8223.6South Carolina, 2003: 214.8South Carolina, 2005: 213.2South Carolina, 2007: 213.8South Carolina, 2009: 215.9South Carolina, 2011: 214.9South Carolina, 2013: 213.6South Carolina, 2015: 218South Carolina, 2017: 213.1South Carolina, 2019: 216South Carolina, 2022: 216.4South Carolina, 2024: 214.9200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 22National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationSouth Carolina · Historic South Carolina flooding displaces residents and disrupts roads and homes · 2015-10-01South Carolina floodsSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-27: Paid leave for state employees affected by emergency closures · 2015-10-20Executive Order 2015-27National context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● South Carolina Legislature · 9● U.S. Congress · South Carolina delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 8■ South Carolina agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2003-12-012026-08-31

17 of 17 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 17 date markers shown. 22 major events shown separately.

South Carolina · 2024: 214.9 · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in South Carolina. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Carolina Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodSouth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
2024214.9#24 of 50215
2022216.4#25 of 50217.5
2019216#42 of 50220.5
2017213.1#47 of 50221.9
2015218#38 of 50222.5
2013213.6#44 of 50221.8
2011214.9#40 of 50221.2
2009215.9#41 of 50220.9
2007213.8#43 of 50221
2005213.2#41 of 50219
2003214.8#36 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Carolina · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

South Carolina · 2020–202490.1%
South Carolina rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 90.1%2020–2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina · your comparison90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

90.1%2020–2024 estimate

Share of South Carolina residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
  • A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
South Carolina · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

South Carolina · 2024214.9
South Carolina rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in South Carolina. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Grade 4 reading history in South Carolina211.7217.8223.920032024
2024 · South Carolina: 214.9 · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Grade 4 reading history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2003214.8
2005213.2
2007213.8
2009215.9
2011214.9
2013213.6
2015218
2017213.1
2019216
2022216.4
2024214.9

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 214.92024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina · your comparison214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

South Carolina · FY2024$15,060
South Carolina rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $15,060FY2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina · your comparison$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

South Carolina · 2021–2284%
South Carolina rank#33among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in South Carolina73.2%81%88.8%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · South Carolina: 84% · Rank #33 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2011–1275%
2012–1378%
2013–1480%
2014–1580%
2015–1683%
2016–1784%
2017–1881%
2018–1981%
2019–2082%
2020–2183%
2021–2284%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 84%2021–22 · Rank #33 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina · your comparison84%—
#33Washington84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

South Carolina · 2022–23$12,604
South Carolina rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $12,6042022–23 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina · your comparison$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

75 statements from 17 candidates

2026 South Carolina Commissioner of Agriculture — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

DeShawn Blanding

1 statement

Democratic · Commissioner of Agriculture · SC

Schools & education

Regional Agricultural Infrastructure & Innovation Network Build a statewide research and innovation network of four Regional Agriculture Innovation Centers through public-private partnerships with local governments, Clemson University, SC State University, and the state’s technical college system. E…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sustainable Locally Rooted Processing Facilities

Candidate campaign source

Regional Agricultural Infrastructure & Innovation Network Build a statewide research and innovation network of four Regional Agriculture Innovation Centers through public-private partnerships with local governments, Clemson University, SC State University, and the state’s technical college system. Each center includes shared-use processing facilities, cold storage, aggregation capacity, a business incubation component, and direct connection to Clemson and SC State Extension services, and each center integrates processing, research, entrepreneurship, and workforce development for its regional commodity base.Lowcountry/Coastal Center — Aquaculture, seafood processing, and coastal fisheries. Hub for South Carolina’s growing shrimping, shellfish, and fish farming sectors with shared processing and cold chain infrastructure.Upstate/Western Piedmont Center — Livestock operations, poultry producers, and pasture-based agriculture. Addresses the gap in small- and mid-scale meat processing that forces SC livestock farmers to send animals out of state.Pee Dee/Midlands Center — Commodity growers, fruit and vegetable producers, and specialty crop farmers. Anchored to the Florence State Farmers Market, connecting row crop producers to value-added markets and direct local supply chains.Central Coastal Plain/I-26 Corridor Center — Forestry, milling, and wood products manufacturing. Supports the timber sector, which covers over 60% of SC’s land base, with sustainable forestry innovation and rural manufacturing.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

DeShawn Blanding campaign source 4 ↗

2026 South Carolina Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 15 statements

Alan Wilson

1 statement

Republican · Governor · SC

Schools & education

Alan Wilson believes every child in South Carolina deserves access to a quality school, and that every parent deserves a voice in their child’s education. As Governor, he will fully fund public schools and expand school choice to ensure families have more control over their children’s education. Wil…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Alan Wilson believes every child in South Carolina deserves access to a quality school, and that every parent deserves a voice in their child’s education. As Governor, he will fully fund public schools and expand school choice to ensure families have more control over their children’s education. Wilson will focus on improving early childhood literacy, strengthening technical and vocational education, and empower parents to stand up to woke politics in the classroom. Education should be about ABCs and 123s—not political agendas. Wilson will keep the woke indoctrination out of classrooms and will expand the School Resource Officer programs to ensure students are learning in a safe environment.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alan Wilson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Jermaine Johnson

6 statements

Democratic · Governor · SC

Schools & education

It’s time to invest in our trade and technical colleges. While public and private universities have increased the costs of higher education, more and more of their graduates are facing an uncertain future as AI and other technologies are disrupting job markets. At the same time, our country has a sh…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity

Candidate campaign source

It’s time to invest in our trade and technical colleges. While public and private universities have increased the costs of higher education, more and more of their graduates are facing an uncertain future as AI and other technologies are disrupting job markets. At the same time, our country has a shortage of electricians and skilled technicians. Jermaine allocated half a million dollars to found the Lower Richland Tech Academy that teaches low- and no- coding technologies to its students. This is a framework that has proved successful in his district and can be applied statewide. As governor, Jermaine will increase the focus and funding for trade schools and tech academies.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 5 more statements from Jermaine Johnson
Schools & education

Increase focus on trade schools

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Increase focus on trade schools

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

It is time to invest in South Carolinians’ mental health. Veterans, teens, moms, dads: everyone knows someone who is struggling. Jermaine wrote a bill that calls for basic mental health training for school administrators, religious leaders, and community leaders—including neighborhood association pr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

It is time to invest in South Carolinians’ mental health. Veterans, teens, moms, dads: everyone knows someone who is struggling. Jermaine wrote a bill that calls for basic mental health training for school administrators, religious leaders, and community leaders—including neighborhood association presidents and crime watch members—to improve early identification and response to mental health crises.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

It is time to invest in South Carolina’s public education. As governor, Jermaine will conduct a full audit of South Carolina’s public education system to determine how best to increase access and quality of our state’s public education. But Jermaine doesn’t plan on waiting around and sitting on the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

It is time to invest in South Carolina’s public education. As governor, Jermaine will conduct a full audit of South Carolina’s public education system to determine how best to increase access and quality of our state’s public education. But Jermaine doesn’t plan on waiting around and sitting on the results. Instead, he will use that information to provide every child in South Carolina with access to a quality education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Fix our education system

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Fix our education system

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

It is time to expect more from our fathers and provide them with more rights and responsibilities in the family. As Governor, Jermaine would incentivize employers to offer paid family leave for fathers, support flexible scheduling policies that allow fathers to attend school events and medical appoi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

It is time to expect more from our fathers and provide them with more rights and responsibilities in the family. As Governor, Jermaine would incentivize employers to offer paid family leave for fathers, support flexible scheduling policies that allow fathers to attend school events and medical appointments, and establish a Governor’s Commission on Fathers & Families to guide policy and coordination. If we want our sons and daughters to grow up in healthy families we need fathers to step up, and we need to give them a path to take to get there.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Walid Hakim

8 statements

Green · Governor · SC

Schools & education

As Governor, he would reduce the reliance on school resource officers and redirect that funding toward safety improvements.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, he would reduce the reliance on school resource officers and redirect that funding toward safety improvements.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 7 more statements from Walid Hakim
Schools & education

Hakim believes that a strong state begins with strong education. Instead of cutting funding, South Carolina must invest deeply in its schools and students. He proposes the creation of “South Carolina College Investment Grants” for students pursuing critical careers; such as nursing, medicine, engine…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Hakim believes that a strong state begins with strong education. Instead of cutting funding, South Carolina must invest deeply in its schools and students. He proposes the creation of “South Carolina College Investment Grants” for students pursuing critical careers; such as nursing, medicine, engineering, education, social work, and therapy. Rather than burdening graduates with debilitating student loans, this plan allows them to repay the state through service. Every graduate who accepts a grant would commit to living and working in South Carolina for 10–20 years; as taxpayers, homeowners, consumers, and parents. Their contributions to the state’s economy and communities would serve as repayment for their education. This initiative would ensure that the most educated and capable workforce in the world lives right here in South Carolina, making its citizens highly sought after in every field imaginable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Every classroom in South Carolina would be equipped with spring safety locking, bullet-resistant doors. These upgrades would protect students and teachers without criminalizing young people or perpetuating the school-to-prison pipeline. The discipline of students should be managed by the school admi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Every classroom in South Carolina would be equipped with spring safety locking, bullet-resistant doors. These upgrades would protect students and teachers without criminalizing young people or perpetuating the school-to-prison pipeline. The discipline of students should be managed by the school administration and staff, unless law enforcement is requested. We do not need law enforcement inserting themselves when these situation can be resolved by school staff. Through smarter investment in infrastructure, education, and opportunity, Hakim envisions a South Carolina where schools are safe, nurturing, and built for every child’s success.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Nutritious Meals for Every Student: Every school in South Carolina would provide healthy breakfast and lunch to all students, ensuring no child goes hungry during the school day.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Nutritious Meals for Every Student: Every school in South Carolina would provide healthy breakfast and lunch to all students, ensuring no child goes hungry during the school day.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

• Keep total school days the same but adopt a year-round calendar.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

• Keep total school days the same but adopt a year-round calendar.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Hakim’s vision is to develop a 100 Year Plan for South Carolina: a roadmap for a sustainable, prosperous, and resilient state. This plan will invest in sustainable infrastructure that becomes the lifeline of commerce, trade, preserving South Carolina’s remaining forests as sanctuaries for native wil…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Hakim’s vision is to develop a 100 Year Plan for South Carolina: a roadmap for a sustainable, prosperous, and resilient state. This plan will invest in sustainable infrastructure that becomes the lifeline of commerce, trade, preserving South Carolina’s remaining forests as sanctuaries for native wildlife. We will evolve our state education so every student can graduate debt-free making South Carolina a national model for higher learning.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Year-Round Schooling: Schools would transition to a year-round schedule. This program would not add any days to the school calendar. It would eliminate the need for student review at the beginning of every school year, allowing the students to transition to the next year without a long summer break.…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Year-Round Schooling: Schools would transition to a year-round schedule. This program would not add any days to the school calendar. It would eliminate the need for student review at the beginning of every school year, allowing the students to transition to the next year without a long summer break. This would result in students graduating by the completion of the 10th grade.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Statewide Childcare Integration: Childcare would be incorporated into the state school system, giving working parents reliable and affordable early education options.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Statewide Childcare Integration: Childcare would be incorporated into the state school system, giving working parents reliable and affordable early education options.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Carolina State Superintendent of Education — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 8 statements

Sylvia Wright

8 statements

Democratic · State Superintendent of Education · SC

Schools & education

Improve and rebuild relationships between the SC Department of Education, districts, schools, and the communities they serve

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Improve and rebuild relationships between the SC Department of Education, districts, schools, and the communities they serve

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 7 more statements from Sylvia Wright
Schools & education

Ensure taxpayer money is allocated effectively and transparently for the betterment of all public school students

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Ensure taxpayer money is allocated effectively and transparently for the betterment of all public school students

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Strengthen discipline policies that protect teachers in school and online

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen discipline policies that protect teachers in school and online

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Improve working conditions and support structures for teachers and reduce excessive standardized testing

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Improve working conditions and support structures for teachers and reduce excessive standardized testing

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Learn, share, and model best practices between school districts, and support turnaround plans based on needs to be defined by community commissions, rather than top-down state interventions that sometimes ignore what local communities want and need

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Learn, share, and model best practices between school districts, and support turnaround plans based on needs to be defined by community commissions, rather than top-down state interventions that sometimes ignore what local communities want and need

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Equip: Provide true school choice options and individualized success pathways for every K-12 student

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Equip: Provide true school choice options and individualized success pathways for every K-12 student

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Ensure teacher preparation programs are giving teachers the tools to educate 21st century learners and evolve student teaching to a paid internship model (ie. Clemson and USC CAP’s mentoring / residency program)

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Ensure teacher preparation programs are giving teachers the tools to educate 21st century learners and evolve student teaching to a paid internship model (ie. Clemson and USC CAP’s mentoring / residency program)

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Schools & education

Facilitate better communication by expanding the Communities in Schools program and by connecting partnerships to supply the needs of students, family, and community engagement

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Facilitate better communication by expanding the Communities in Schools program and by connecting partnerships to supply the needs of students, family, and community engagement

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sylvia Wright — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 4
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

151 matching sponsorships or proposals · 83 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Adam L. Duncan

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 2 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Adam L. Duncan
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3196

Educator Assistance Act

May 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Annie E. McDaniel

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 41 · D–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Annie E. McDaniel
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3645

Paid family leave

Apr 30, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. April Cromer

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 6 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. April Cromer
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3196

Educator Assistance Act

May 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 78 · D–SC

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Beth E. Bernstein
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3645

Paid family leave

Apr 30, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3490

Paid family leave

Apr 9, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes increasing state paid parental leave to 12 weeks for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, with specified employee eligibility.

The official record’s latest entry is Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Waters (2025-04-09). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) "Eligible state employee" any person employed full-time by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions. This includes any person employed full-time by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported and under the control of the State. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. […] (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3908

Paid family leave

May 12, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Bruce W. Bannister · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy A. "Tim" McGinnis · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Sen. Deon T. Tedder · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Extends the state paid-parental-leave benefit to school-district employees on the same terms as qualifying state employees.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 17 (2023-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(3) "Paid parental leave", for the purpose of duration and percentage of base pay covered, has the same meaning as Section 8-11-150(3) for eligible school district employees. […] (B) Eligible school district employees who experience a qualifying event are entitled to paid parental leave to the same extent available to employees of the State pursuant to Section 8-11-150.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Taylor

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 86 · R–SC

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Bill Taylor
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3196

Educator Assistance Act

May 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3126

Vaccine mandates

May 2, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Provides unemployment-benefit eligibility for state or local-government employees when a federal COVID-19 vaccination mandate requires termination to avoid forfeiting federal funds, subject to ordinary benefit requirements. It also prohibits vaccination-based compensation reductions for specified first responders.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 142 (2022-05-02). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(B) If the State or any political subdivision thereof, including a school district, is subject to a federal requirement that would lead to the forfeiture of federal funds due to a failure to require employees, independent contractors, or nonemployee vendors to receive a COVID-19 vaccination: (1) the employer may require an unvaccinated employee, independent contractor, or nonemployee vendor to undergo weekly COVID-19 testing if the federal requirement allows for testing as an alternative to vaccination; or (2) the employee is eligible for unemployment benefits subject to the benefit amounts, duration, and requirements as provided in Article 1, Chapter 35, Title 41 if the federal mandate gives the employer no alternative to terminating the employee without forfeiting federal funds. […] "Section 8-15-80. (A) Neither the State, nor any of its political subdivisions, may terminate, suspend, or otherwise reduce the compensation of a person employed as a first responder if the first responder does not undergo a COVID-19 vaccination.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brandon Newton

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 45 · R–SC

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brandon Newton
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3196

Educator Assistance Act

May 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3645

Paid family leave

Apr 30, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3360

Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence

Jun 26, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Creates a SLED Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence to provide training, education and expertise for law enforcement, schools and the public, contingent on appropriated funding.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 79 (2023-06-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 23-3-1500. (A) The Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence is established within the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). The purpose of the center is to provide extensive training, education, and expertise in the fields of school safety and targeted violence. (B) SLED shall adopt guidelines and establish procedures for training and educating local and state law enforcement, teachers, administrators, bus drivers, other school personnel, parents and the public on school safety and targeted violence. […] SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor and is contingent upon funding in the general appropriations act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.