Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.
High school or higher90.1%2020–2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher42.1%2020–2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher32.1%2020–2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
South Carolina over time
Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Grade 4 reading South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
17 of 17 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 17 date markers shown. 22 major events shown separately.
South Carolina · 2024: 214.9 · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in South Carolina. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
South Carolina · state comparison
Adult educational attainment
Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.
South Carolina · 2020–202490.1%
South Carolina rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
High school or higher
Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.
Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · 90.1%2020–2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
94.9%
—
#2
Maine
94.8%
—
#3
Montana
94.6%
—
#4
New Hampshire
94.4%
—
#5
Wyoming
94.2%
—
#6
North Dakota
94%
—
#7
Minnesota
93.9%
—
#8
Wisconsin
93.6%
—
#9
Alaska
93.6%
—
#10
Utah
93.4%
—
#11
Iowa
93.3%
—
#12
South Dakota
93.2%
—
#13
Hawaii
93.2%
—
#14
Colorado
92.9%
—
#15
Washington
92.3%
—
#16
Nebraska
92.2%
—
#17
Pennsylvania
92.1%
—
#18
Michigan
92.1%
—
#19
Kansas
92%
—
#20
Idaho
91.9%
—
#21
Missouri
91.9%
—
#22
Oregon
91.8%
—
#23
Ohio
91.8%
—
#24
Delaware
91.7%
—
#25
Virginia
91.6%
—
#26
Connecticut
91.5%
—
#27
Massachusetts
91.4%
—
#28
Maryland
91.1%
—
#29
New Jersey
90.7%
—
#30
Illinois
90.5%
—
#31
Indiana
90.4%
—
#32
North Carolina
90.1%
—
#33
South Carolina · your comparison
90.1%
—
#34
Tennessee
90%
—
#35
Florida
89.9%
—
#36
Rhode Island
89.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
89.4%
—
#38
Arizona
89.4%
—
#39
West Virginia
89.3%
—
#40
Georgia
89.2%
—
#41
Kentucky
88.9%
—
#42
Arkansas
88.7%
—
#43
Alabama
88.6%
—
#44
New Mexico
88%
—
#45
New York
88%
—
#46
Nevada
87.5%
—
#47
Louisiana
87.3%
—
#48
Mississippi
87.1%
—
#49
Texas
86%
—
#50
California
84.7%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of South Carolina residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.
This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.
South Carolina · 2024214.9
South Carolina rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Grade 4 reading
FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in South Carolina. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.
NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
South Carolina
2024 · South Carolina: 214.9 · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
South Carolina Grade 4 reading history
Period
South Carolina
Compare
2003
214.8
2005
213.2
2007
213.8
2009
215.9
2011
214.9
2013
213.6
2015
218
2017
213.1
2019
216
2022
216.4
2024
214.9
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · 214.92024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Massachusetts
224.8
—
#2
Wyoming
221.9
—
#3
New Jersey
221.6
—
#4
New Hampshire
221.5
—
#5
Colorado
220.9
—
#6
Indiana
220.1
—
#7
Utah
219.3
—
#8
Connecticut
219.2
—
#9
Mississippi
218.5
—
#10
Florida
218.2
—
#11
Kentucky
218
—
#12
Montana
217.2
—
#13
Rhode Island
216.3
—
#14
Louisiana
216
—
#14
Ohio
216
—
#16
Hawaii
215.8
—
#16
Pennsylvania
215.8
—
#18
Idaho
215.7
—
#18
Washington
215.7
—
#20
Maryland
215.6
—
#21
North Dakota
215.5
—
#22
Wisconsin
215.3
—
#23
Tennessee
215.1
—
#24
South Carolina · your comparison
214.9
—
#25
Iowa
214.6
—
#25
New York
214.6
—
#27
Georgia
214.4
—
#27
Minnesota
214.4
—
#29
Illinois
214.2
—
#30
South Dakota
214.1
—
#30
Virginia
214.1
—
#32
North Carolina
213.4
—
#33
Alabama
213.2
—
#34
Kansas
213.1
—
#34
Nevada
213.1
—
#36
Vermont
212.7
—
#37
Missouri
211.9
—
#37
Texas
211.9
—
#39
California
211.7
—
#39
Nebraska
211.7
—
#41
Arkansas
209.7
—
#42
Maine
209.6
—
#43
Delaware
209.5
—
#44
Michigan
209.1
—
#45
Arizona
208.1
—
#46
Oklahoma
207.3
—
#47
Oregon
207
—
#48
West Virginia
205.9
—
#49
Alaska
201.6
—
#50
New Mexico
200.6
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.
South Carolina · FY2024$15,060
South Carolina rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current spending per pupil
Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.
Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · $15,060FY2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$31,918
—
#2
Vermont
$28,818
—
#3
New Jersey
$27,234
—
#4
Connecticut
$26,316
—
#5
Massachusetts
$24,429
—
#6
Hawaii
$23,878
—
#7
New Hampshire
$22,978
—
#8
Delaware
$22,201
—
#9
Rhode Island
$22,110
—
#10
Illinois
$21,776
—
#11
Pennsylvania
$21,091
—
#12
Alaska
$21,004
—
#13
California
$20,791
—
#14
Wyoming
$20,521
—
#15
Maryland
$20,208
—
#16
Maine
$19,962
—
#17
Washington
$18,564
—
#18
Michigan
$18,314
—
#19
Oregon
$18,083
—
#20
New Mexico
$17,664
—
#21
Ohio
$17,257
—
#22
Virginia
$17,104
—
#23
North Dakota
$17,102
—
#24
Minnesota
$17,098
—
#25
Nebraska
$16,147
—
#26
Wisconsin
$15,952
—
#27
Colorado
$15,908
—
#28
Georgia
$15,833
—
#29
West Virginia
$15,640
—
#30
Louisiana
$15,581
—
#31
Kansas
$15,558
—
#32
South Carolina · your comparison
$15,060
—
#33
Nevada
$14,812
—
#34
Kentucky
$14,596
—
#35
Iowa
$14,369
—
#36
Missouri
$14,241
—
#37
Arkansas
$13,873
—
#38
Montana
$13,656
—
#39
Alabama
$13,627
—
#40
Indiana
$13,622
—
#41
North Carolina
$12,995
—
#42
Texas
$12,895
—
#43
Tennessee
$12,882
—
#44
South Dakota
$12,828
—
#45
Florida
$12,693
—
#46
Mississippi
$12,324
—
#47
Oklahoma
$12,162
—
#48
Arizona
$12,003
—
#49
Utah
$11,347
—
#50
Idaho
$11,060
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.
South Carolina · 2021–2284%
South Carolina rank#33among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate
Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.
Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
South Carolina
2021–22 · South Carolina: 84% · Rank #33 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
South Carolina Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
Period
South Carolina
Compare
2011–12
75%
2012–13
78%
2013–14
80%
2014–15
80%
2015–16
83%
2016–17
84%
2017–18
81%
2018–19
81%
2019–20
82%
2020–21
83%
2021–22
84%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · 84%2021–22 · Rank #33 of 48, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
West Virginia
91%
—
#2
Iowa
90%
—
#2
Kentucky
90%
—
#2
Massachusetts
90%
—
#2
Missouri
90%
—
#2
Tennessee
90%
—
#2
Texas
90%
—
#2
Wisconsin
90%
—
#9
Connecticut
89%
—
#9
Kansas
89%
—
#9
Mississippi
89%
—
#9
Virginia
89%
—
#13
Alabama
88%
—
#13
Arkansas
88%
—
#13
Delaware
88%
—
#13
Indiana
88%
—
#13
New Hampshire
88%
—
#13
Utah
88%
—
#19
California
87%
—
#19
Florida
87%
—
#19
Illinois
87%
—
#19
Nebraska
87%
—
#19
New York
87%
—
#19
Pennsylvania
87%
—
#25
Hawaii
86%
—
#25
Maine
86%
—
#25
Maryland
86%
—
#25
Montana
86%
—
#25
North Carolina
86%
—
#25
Ohio
86%
—
#31
New Jersey
85%
—
#31
North Dakota
85%
—
#33
Georgia
84%
—
#33
Minnesota
84%
—
#33
South Carolina · your comparison
84%
—
#33
Washington
84%
—
#37
Louisiana
83%
—
#37
Rhode Island
83%
—
#37
Vermont
83%
—
#40
Colorado
82%
—
#40
Nevada
82%
—
#40
South Dakota
82%
—
#40
Wyoming
82%
—
#44
Michigan
81%
—
#44
Oregon
81%
—
#46
Idaho
80%
—
#47
Alaska
78%
—
#48
Arizona
77%
—
—
New Mexico
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Oklahoma
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.
South Carolina · 2022–23$12,604
South Carolina rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees
Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.
2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.
Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
South Carolina · $12,6042022–23 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Vermont
$17,600
—
#2
New Hampshire
$17,019
—
#3
Pennsylvania
$16,217
—
#4
Connecticut
$15,763
—
#5
New Jersey
$15,265
—
#6
Illinois
$14,921
—
#7
Virginia
$14,825
—
#8
Rhode Island
$14,744
—
#9
Michigan
$14,718
—
#10
Massachusetts
$14,345
—
#11
Minnesota
$12,873
—
#12
South Carolina · your comparison
$12,604
—
#13
Oregon
$12,424
—
#14
Delaware
$11,922
—
#15
Arizona
$11,768
—
#16
Kentucky
$11,299
—
#17
Alabama
$11,081
—
#18
Ohio
$10,922
—
#19
Maine
$10,813
—
#20
Hawaii
$10,484
—
#21
Tennessee
$10,437
—
#22
Iowa
$10,121
—
#23
Maryland
$10,041
—
#24
Missouri
$9,926
—
#25
Indiana
$9,886
—
#26
Louisiana
$9,843
—
#27
Colorado
$9,798
—
#28
North Dakota
$9,728
—
#29
Kansas
$9,274
—
#30
Mississippi
$9,120
—
#31
South Dakota
$9,079
—
#32
Wisconsin
$8,974
—
#33
Arkansas
$8,879
—
#34
Nebraska
$8,862
—
#35
West Virginia
$8,715
—
#36
California
$8,637
—
#37
New York
$8,575
—
#38
Oklahoma
$8,519
—
#39
Alaska
$8,291
—
#40
Texas
$8,195
—
#41
Washington
$8,006
—
#42
Idaho
$7,640
—
#43
New Mexico
$7,526
—
#44
North Carolina
$7,327
—
#45
Montana
$7,299
—
#46
Utah
$7,215
—
#47
Georgia
$7,075
—
#48
Nevada
$6,723
—
#49
Wyoming
$5,100
—
#50
Florida
$4,540
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
17 of 17 reviewed South Carolina actions · newest first
Jul 1, 2026 · SB 11 · Paid Family Leave Eligible State Employee · EnactedSouth Carolina Legislature · SB 11
Paid Family Leave Eligible State Employee
Jul 1, 2026 · Enacted
Sen. Darrell Jackson · Sponsored / Sen. Tom Davis · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Expands eligible state employees for paid parental leave, including specified higher-education positions, and provides six weeks of base pay for employees giving birth or stillbirth and four weeks for other qualifying parents.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 249 (2026-07-01). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a full-time equivalent, temporary grant, or time-limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means six weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth or stillbirth are entitled to receive six weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (1) The entitlement to leave pursuant to subsection (B) expires at the end of the twelve-month period beginning on the date of such birth or initial legal placement. An eligible state employee shall receive no more than one occurrence of six or four weeks of paid parental leave for any twelve-month period, even if more than one qualifying event occurs. However, nothing in this item prohibits a foster parent from requesting and receiving approval for parental leave in nonconsecutive one-week time periods.
Henry McMaster signed SB 11. Expands eligible state employees for paid parental leave, including specified higher-education positions, and provides six weeks of base pay for employees giving birth or stillbirth and four weeks for other qualifying parents.
Signed By Governor. This records the historical action; current enforceability and implementation are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a full-time equivalent, temporary grant, or time-limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means six weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth or stillbirth are entitled to receive six weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (1) The entitlement to leave pursuant to subsection (B) expires at the end of the twelve-month period beginning on the date of such birth or initial legal placement. An eligible state employee shall receive no more than one occurrence of six or four weeks of paid parental leave for any twelve-month period, even if more than one qualifying event occurs. However, nothing in this item prohibits a foster parent from requesting and receiving approval for parental leave in nonconsecutive one-week time periods.
Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Henry McMaster signed HB 3196. Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.
Signed By Governor. This records the historical action; current enforceability and implementation are not inferred.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.
The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Proposes increasing state paid parental leave to 12 weeks for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, with specified employee eligibility.
The official record’s latest entry is Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Waters (2025-04-09). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) "Eligible state employee" any person employed full-time by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions. This includes any person employed full-time by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported and under the control of the State. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. […] (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified South Carolina officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
75 statements from 17 candidates
2026 South Carolina Commissioner of Agriculture — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
Regional Agricultural Infrastructure & Innovation Network Build a statewide research and innovation network of four Regional Agriculture Innovation Centers through public-private partnerships with local governments, Clemson University, SC State University, and the state’s technical college system. E…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Sustainable Locally Rooted Processing Facilities
Candidate campaign source
Regional Agricultural Infrastructure & Innovation Network Build a statewide research and innovation network of four Regional Agriculture Innovation Centers through public-private partnerships with local governments, Clemson University, SC State University, and the state’s technical college system. Each center includes shared-use processing facilities, cold storage, aggregation capacity, a business incubation component, and direct connection to Clemson and SC State Extension services, and each center integrates processing, research, entrepreneurship, and workforce development for its regional commodity base.Lowcountry/Coastal Center — Aquaculture, seafood processing, and coastal fisheries. Hub for South Carolina’s growing shrimping, shellfish, and fish farming sectors with shared processing and cold chain infrastructure.Upstate/Western Piedmont Center — Livestock operations, poultry producers, and pasture-based agriculture. Addresses the gap in small- and mid-scale meat processing that forces SC livestock farmers to send animals out of state.Pee Dee/Midlands Center — Commodity growers, fruit and vegetable producers, and specialty crop farmers. Anchored to the Florence State Farmers Market, connecting row crop producers to value-added markets and direct local supply chains.Central Coastal Plain/I-26 Corridor Center — Forestry, milling, and wood products manufacturing. Supports the timber sector, which covers over 60% of SC’s land base, with sustainable forestry innovation and rural manufacturing.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Alan Wilson believes every child in South Carolina deserves access to a quality school, and that every parent deserves a voice in their child’s education. As Governor, he will fully fund public schools and expand school choice to ensure families have more control over their children’s education. Wil…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment
Candidate campaign source
Alan Wilson believes every child in South Carolina deserves access to a quality school, and that every parent deserves a voice in their child’s education. As Governor, he will fully fund public schools and expand school choice to ensure families have more control over their children’s education. Wilson will focus on improving early childhood literacy, strengthening technical and vocational education, and empower parents to stand up to woke politics in the classroom. Education should be about ABCs and 123s—not political agendas. Wilson will keep the woke indoctrination out of classrooms and will expand the School Resource Officer programs to ensure students are learning in a safe environment.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
It’s time to invest in our trade and technical colleges. While public and private universities have increased the costs of higher education, more and more of their graduates are facing an uncertain future as AI and other technologies are disrupting job markets. At the same time, our country has a sh…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity
Candidate campaign source
It’s time to invest in our trade and technical colleges. While public and private universities have increased the costs of higher education, more and more of their graduates are facing an uncertain future as AI and other technologies are disrupting job markets. At the same time, our country has a shortage of electricians and skilled technicians. Jermaine allocated half a million dollars to found the Lower Richland Tech Academy that teaches low- and no- coding technologies to its students. This is a framework that has proved successful in his district and can be applied statewide. As governor, Jermaine will increase the focus and funding for trade schools and tech academies.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
It is time to invest in South Carolinians’ mental health. Veterans, teens, moms, dads: everyone knows someone who is struggling. Jermaine wrote a bill that calls for basic mental health training for school administrators, religious leaders, and community leaders—including neighborhood association pr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
It is time to invest in South Carolinians’ mental health. Veterans, teens, moms, dads: everyone knows someone who is struggling. Jermaine wrote a bill that calls for basic mental health training for school administrators, religious leaders, and community leaders—including neighborhood association presidents and crime watch members—to improve early identification and response to mental health crises.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
It is time to invest in South Carolina’s public education. As governor, Jermaine will conduct a full audit of South Carolina’s public education system to determine how best to increase access and quality of our state’s public education. But Jermaine doesn’t plan on waiting around and sitting on the …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
It is time to invest in South Carolina’s public education. As governor, Jermaine will conduct a full audit of South Carolina’s public education system to determine how best to increase access and quality of our state’s public education. But Jermaine doesn’t plan on waiting around and sitting on the results. Instead, he will use that information to provide every child in South Carolina with access to a quality education.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
It is time to expect more from our fathers and provide them with more rights and responsibilities in the family. As Governor, Jermaine would incentivize employers to offer paid family leave for fathers, support flexible scheduling policies that allow fathers to attend school events and medical appoi…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
It is time to expect more from our fathers and provide them with more rights and responsibilities in the family. As Governor, Jermaine would incentivize employers to offer paid family leave for fathers, support flexible scheduling policies that allow fathers to attend school events and medical appointments, and establish a Governor’s Commission on Fathers & Families to guide policy and coordination. If we want our sons and daughters to grow up in healthy families we need fathers to step up, and we need to give them a path to take to get there.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Hakim believes that a strong state begins with strong education. Instead of cutting funding, South Carolina must invest deeply in its schools and students. He proposes the creation of “South Carolina College Investment Grants” for students pursuing critical careers; such as nursing, medicine, engine…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Hakim believes that a strong state begins with strong education. Instead of cutting funding, South Carolina must invest deeply in its schools and students. He proposes the creation of “South Carolina College Investment Grants” for students pursuing critical careers; such as nursing, medicine, engineering, education, social work, and therapy. Rather than burdening graduates with debilitating student loans, this plan allows them to repay the state through service. Every graduate who accepts a grant would commit to living and working in South Carolina for 10–20 years; as taxpayers, homeowners, consumers, and parents. Their contributions to the state’s economy and communities would serve as repayment for their education. This initiative would ensure that the most educated and capable workforce in the world lives right here in South Carolina, making its citizens highly sought after in every field imaginable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Every classroom in South Carolina would be equipped with spring safety locking, bullet-resistant doors. These upgrades would protect students and teachers without criminalizing young people or perpetuating the school-to-prison pipeline. The discipline of students should be managed by the school admi…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure
Candidate campaign source
Every classroom in South Carolina would be equipped with spring safety locking, bullet-resistant doors. These upgrades would protect students and teachers without criminalizing young people or perpetuating the school-to-prison pipeline. The discipline of students should be managed by the school administration and staff, unless law enforcement is requested. We do not need law enforcement inserting themselves when these situation can be resolved by school staff. Through smarter investment in infrastructure, education, and opportunity, Hakim envisions a South Carolina where schools are safe, nurturing, and built for every child’s success.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Nutritious Meals for Every Student: Every school in South Carolina would provide healthy breakfast and lunch to all students, ensuring no child goes hungry during the school day.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Nutritious Meals for Every Student: Every school in South Carolina would provide healthy breakfast and lunch to all students, ensuring no child goes hungry during the school day.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Hakim’s vision is to develop a 100 Year Plan for South Carolina: a roadmap for a sustainable, prosperous, and resilient state. This plan will invest in sustainable infrastructure that becomes the lifeline of commerce, trade, preserving South Carolina’s remaining forests as sanctuaries for native wil…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure
Candidate campaign source
Hakim’s vision is to develop a 100 Year Plan for South Carolina: a roadmap for a sustainable, prosperous, and resilient state. This plan will invest in sustainable infrastructure that becomes the lifeline of commerce, trade, preserving South Carolina’s remaining forests as sanctuaries for native wildlife. We will evolve our state education so every student can graduate debt-free making South Carolina a national model for higher learning.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Year-Round Schooling: Schools would transition to a year-round schedule. This program would not add any days to the school calendar. It would eliminate the need for student review at the beginning of every school year, allowing the students to transition to the next year without a long summer break.…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Year-Round Schooling: Schools would transition to a year-round schedule. This program would not add any days to the school calendar. It would eliminate the need for student review at the beginning of every school year, allowing the students to transition to the next year without a long summer break. This would result in students graduating by the completion of the 10th grade.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Statewide Childcare Integration: Childcare would be incorporated into the state school system, giving working parents reliable and affordable early education options.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Statewide Childcare Integration: Childcare would be incorporated into the state school system, giving working parents reliable and affordable early education options.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Learn, share, and model best practices between school districts, and support turnaround plans based on needs to be defined by community commissions, rather than top-down state interventions that sometimes ignore what local communities want and need
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Learn, share, and model best practices between school districts, and support turnaround plans based on needs to be defined by community commissions, rather than top-down state interventions that sometimes ignore what local communities want and need
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Ensure teacher preparation programs are giving teachers the tools to educate 21st century learners and evolve student teaching to a paid internship model (ie. Clemson and USC CAP’s mentoring / residency program)
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training
Candidate campaign source
Ensure teacher preparation programs are giving teachers the tools to educate 21st century learners and evolve student teaching to a paid internship model (ie. Clemson and USC CAP’s mentoring / residency program)
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Facilitate better communication by expanding the Communities in Schools program and by connecting partnerships to supply the needs of students, family, and community engagement
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
Facilitate better communication by expanding the Communities in Schools program and by connecting partnerships to supply the needs of students, family, and community engagement
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
South Carolina incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
151 matching sponsorships or proposals · 83 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Adam L. Duncan
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 2 · R–SC
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Adam L. DuncanSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3196
Educator Assistance Act
May 12, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 41 · D–SC
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Annie E. McDanielSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3645
Paid family leave
Apr 30, 2025 · Not enacted
Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.
The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 6 · R–SC
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. April CromerSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3196
Educator Assistance Act
May 12, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 78 · D–SC
3 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Beth E. BernsteinSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3645
Paid family leave
Apr 30, 2025 · Not enacted
Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.
The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Proposes increasing state paid parental leave to 12 weeks for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, with specified employee eligibility.
The official record’s latest entry is Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Waters (2025-04-09). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) "Eligible state employee" any person employed full-time by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions. This includes any person employed full-time by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported and under the control of the State. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. […] (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event.
Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Bruce W. Bannister · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Sen. Russell L. Ott · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy A. "Tim" McGinnis · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Seth Rose · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Sen. Deon T. Tedder · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Extends the state paid-parental-leave benefit to school-district employees on the same terms as qualifying state employees.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 17 (2023-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(3) "Paid parental leave", for the purpose of duration and percentage of base pay covered, has the same meaning as Section 8-11-150(3) for eligible school district employees. […] (B) Eligible school district employees who experience a qualifying event are entitled to paid parental leave to the same extent available to employees of the State pursuant to Section 8-11-150.
South Carolina House of Representatives · District 86 · R–SC
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Bill TaylorSouth Carolina Legislature · HB 3196
Educator Assistance Act
May 12, 2025 · Enacted
Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Provides unemployment-benefit eligibility for state or local-government employees when a federal COVID-19 vaccination mandate requires termination to avoid forfeiting federal funds, subject to ordinary benefit requirements. It also prohibits vaccination-based compensation reductions for specified first responders.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 142 (2022-05-02). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(B) If the State or any political subdivision thereof, including a school district, is subject to a federal requirement that would lead to the forfeiture of federal funds due to a failure to require employees, independent contractors, or nonemployee vendors to receive a COVID-19 vaccination: (1) the employer may require an unvaccinated employee, independent contractor, or nonemployee vendor to undergo weekly COVID-19 testing if the federal requirement allows for testing as an alternative to vaccination; or (2) the employee is eligible for unemployment benefits subject to the benefit amounts, duration, and requirements as provided in Article 1, Chapter 35, Title 41 if the federal mandate gives the employer no alternative to terminating the employee without forfeiting federal funds. […] "Section 8-15-80. (A) Neither the State, nor any of its political subdivisions, may terminate, suspend, or otherwise reduce the compensation of a person employed as a first responder if the first responder does not undergo a COVID-19 vaccination.
Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. David Martin · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Jackie R. Terribile · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard Blake Sanders · Sponsored / Rep. Adam L. Duncan · Sponsored / Rep. James E. Teeple · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas F. "Tom" Hartnett, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Sarita L. Edgerton · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Robert T. Reese · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Terry Alexander · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requires school districts and charter schools to create sick-leave banks allowing employees to donate unused sick or annual leave above 60 days for other employees. It retains the existing option to pay eligible staff for specified leave above 90 days; it does not newly create that payment option.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 12 (2025-05-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 3. Section 59-25-47 of the S.C. Code is amended to read: Section 59-25-47. (A) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, is authorized to adopt a policy consistent with the school district or, in the case of a charter school, the school budget, providing that all certified and noncertified public school teachers identified in the Professional Certified Staff listing, certified special school classroom teachers, certified school librarians, certified school counselors, and career specialists who are employed by a school district or a charter school who earn, but do not use sick and annual leave in excess of ninety days, may be eligible to receive payment at the end of each fiscal year for these earned days in excess of ninety days for each excess day at a district's or charter school's established rate of substitute pay for their individual job classification, or another amount, subject to approval by the local school board, or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of the charter school. This provision applies only to sick leave and annual leave in excess of ninety days that is accrued after July 1, 2018. (B) A local school district board of trustees or, in the case of a charter school, the governing body of a charter school, must adopt a policy enabling all district or charter school employees to contribute any unused sick or annual leave in excess of sixty days to a sick leave bank that is made available to all district or charter school employees. Such policy must include criteria for employee eligibility to apply for use of the sick leave bank, procedures for review of applications for use of the sick leave bank, and criteria for the maximum number of days an employee may access from the sick leave bank during a single fiscal year.
Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leonidas E. "Leon" Stavrinakis · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Elizabeth "Spencer" Wetmore · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. J. Todd Rutherford · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Sponsored / Rep. Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Rosalyn D. Henderson-Myers, Ph.D. · Sponsored / Rep. Jerry N. Govan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Carl L. Anderson · Sponsored / Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Proposes 12 weeks of paid parental leave for qualifying births or primary-caregiver adoptions and four weeks for other qualifying parents, and revises eligibility for government and higher-education employees.
The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 7) (2025-04-30). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.
Why this record is included
Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a fulltime equivalent, temporary grant or time limited position. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's base pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and who give birth are entitled to receive twelve weeks of paid parental leave. Other eligible state employees who do not give birth are entitled to receive four weeks of paid parental leave. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday. […] (2) "Eligible state employee" means any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. This includes any person employed by a four-year or postgraduate institution of higher education under the control of the State or a technical college supported by and under the control of the State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave. (3) "Paid parental leave" means twelve weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay or four weeks of paid leave at one hundred percent of the eligible state employee's pay. Leave for part-time eligible state employees must be on a prorated basis corresponding to the percentage of hours they are normally scheduled to work. […] (B) Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions and are primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to twelve weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. Eligible state employees, who are employed by this State, its departments, agencies, or institutions who are not primarily responsible for furnishing the care and nurture of the child, are entitled to four weeks of paid parental leave upon the occurrence of a qualifying event. An employee's paid parental leave is based on an employee's average workday.
Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Creates a SLED Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence to provide training, education and expertise for law enforcement, schools and the public, contingent on appropriated funding.
The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 79 (2023-06-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.
Why this record is included
The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.
Retained South Carolina evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 23-3-1500. (A) The Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence is established within the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). The purpose of the center is to provide extensive training, education, and expertise in the fields of school safety and targeted violence. (B) SLED shall adopt guidelines and establish procedures for training and educating local and state law enforcement, teachers, administrators, bus drivers, other school personnel, parents and the public on school safety and targeted violence. […] SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor and is contingent upon funding in the general appropriations act.
Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
South Carolina snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to South Carolina, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.