South Carolina · individual fact

South Carolina crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and South Carolina public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate440.8 per 100k2024 · #11 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,993.6 per 100k2024 · #15 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.7%2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first

South Carolina over time

Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 440.8 per 100k430.3 per 100k484.5 per 100k538.8 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2015: 492.3 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2016: 506.1 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2017: 504.8 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2018: 498.4 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2019: 508 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2020: 528.3 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2021: 516.1 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2022: 499.8 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2023: 478.1 per 100kSouth Carolina, 2024: 440.8 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 37National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-20: Dorchester coroner suspension after indictment · 2015-10-01Executive Order 2015-20South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-21: Flood emergency, National Guard and limited security registration relief · 2015-10-01Executive Order 2015-21South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-24: Limited law-enforcement mutual-aid agreement waiver · 2015-10-15Executive Order 2015-24South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-27: Paid leave for state employees affected by emergency closures · 2015-10-20Executive Order 2015-27National context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● South Carolina Legislature · 1522● U.S. Congress · South Carolina delegation · 42◆ Governor · 1322■ South Carolina agencies · 12005-01-012026-08-31

33 of 33 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 28 date markers shown. 37 major events shown separately.

South Carolina · 2024: 440.8 per 100k · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. South Carolina's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 98.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Carolina Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodSouth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
2024440.8 per 100k#11 of 50Not available
2023478.1 per 100k#8 of 50Not available
2022499.8 per 100k#9 of 50Not available
2021516.1 per 100k#7 of 50Not available
2020528.3 per 100k#7 of 50Not available
2019508 per 100k#6 of 50Not available
2018498.4 per 100k#9 of 50Not available
2017504.8 per 100k#10 of 50Not available
2016506.1 per 100k#10 of 50Not available
2015492.3 per 100k#9 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Carolina · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

South Carolina · 2024440.8 per 100k
South Carolina rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. South Carolina's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 98.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Reported violent-crime rate history in South Carolina427.7 per 100k484.5 per 100k541.4 per 100k20152024
2024 · South Carolina: 440.8 per 100k · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2015492.3 per 100k
2016506.1 per 100k
2017504.8 per 100k
2018498.4 per 100k
2019508 per 100k
2020528.3 per 100k
2021516.1 per 100k
2022499.8 per 100k
2023478.1 per 100k
2024440.8 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 440.8 per 100k2024 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina · your comparison440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

440.8 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • South Carolina's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 98.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.7%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

1,993.6 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • South Carolina's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 98.8% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.7%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
South Carolina · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

South Carolina · 20241,064
South Carolina rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 1,0642024 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina · your comparison1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

1,0642024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
19.5 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data.

  • The total combines firearm deaths across intents, including suicide, homicide, legal intervention, and unintentional or undetermined injury.
  • It does not measure nonfatal injuries, firearm ownership, defensive uses, or policy effects.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

16 statements from 10 candidates

2026 South Carolina Attorney General — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

David Stumbo

3 statements

Republican · Attorney General · SC

Policing & criminal justice context

A lifelong conservative, Stumbo is committed to defending constitutional rights, protecting religious freedom, and standing strong for the rule of law. His campaign for Attorney General is rooted in ensuring safer communities, supporting law enforcement, and delivering justice with integrity from da…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Civil rights and individual freedom

Candidate campaign source

A lifelong conservative, Stumbo is committed to defending constitutional rights, protecting religious freedom, and standing strong for the rule of law. His campaign for Attorney General is rooted in ensuring safer communities, supporting law enforcement, and delivering justice with integrity from day one.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

David Stumbo — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from David Stumbo
Policing & criminal justice context

Saying you are a Republican isn't enough. David Stumbo is a lifelong conservative. David has never wavered in his conservative principles - fiercely supporting bold pro-family truths that the sanctity of life of the unborn, religious liberty, and parental rights must be protected. An advocate for la…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Saying you are a Republican isn't enough. David Stumbo is a lifelong conservative. David has never wavered in his conservative principles - fiercely supporting bold pro-family truths that the sanctity of life of the unborn, religious liberty, and parental rights must be protected. An advocate for law enforcement, healthcare freedom, lower taxes, and a transparent government - David will fight for our conservative values as Attorney General.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

David Stumbo — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

David Stumbo has spent his entire career fighting crime, putting criminals behind bars, and making our communities safer. David has successfully prosecuted criminal illegal aliens, murderers, rapists, domestic abusers, and drug dealers. With decades of real courtroom experience and strong partnershi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy

Candidate campaign source

David Stumbo has spent his entire career fighting crime, putting criminals behind bars, and making our communities safer. David has successfully prosecuted criminal illegal aliens, murderers, rapists, domestic abusers, and drug dealers. With decades of real courtroom experience and strong partnerships with local law enforcement, David will protect the rule of law and deliver justice for South Carolina families on Day One as Attorney General.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

David Stumbo — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Richard Hricik

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · SC

Policing & criminal justice context

Use the office's convening power to bring solicitors together around tougher, consistent DUI standards — and publicly track and report all plea and conviction rates, along with sentences, so you can see which circuits are letting drunk drivers walk. Work with the legislature, the courts, and judges …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 5 Solutions To Protect You!

Candidate campaign source

Use the office's convening power to bring solicitors together around tougher, consistent DUI standards — and publicly track and report all plea and conviction rates, along with sentences, so you can see which circuits are letting drunk drivers walk. Work with the legislature, the courts, and judges on recommended sentencing guidelines, so there's consistent punishment and real change. Provide model policies, training, and resources to help solicitors and law enforcement win their DUI cases under the law, instead of being forced to plea. Teaching law is what I do.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Richard Hricik — validated position source ↗

2026 South Carolina Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Alan Wilson

1 statement

Republican · Governor · SC

Policing & criminal justice context

As Governor, Alan Wilson will restore law and order as the foundation of South Carolina’s future. He’ll work closely with law enforcement to dismantle criminal networks and strengthen penalties for fentanyl and violent offenders.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, Alan Wilson will restore law and order as the foundation of South Carolina’s future. He’ll work closely with law enforcement to dismantle criminal networks and strengthen penalties for fentanyl and violent offenders.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alan Wilson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Jermaine Johnson

2 statements

Democratic · Governor · SC

Policing & criminal justice context

It is time to invest in South Carolina’s law enforcement. Jermaine would raise the salaries for and hire additional state and local law enforcement officers around the state to ensure the safety of all South Carolinians. Jermaine would also ensure that there are mental health response teams trained …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

It is time to invest in South Carolina’s law enforcement. Jermaine would raise the salaries for and hire additional state and local law enforcement officers around the state to ensure the safety of all South Carolinians. Jermaine would also ensure that there are mental health response teams trained to handle the de-escalation of crises that don’t need armed police intervention, so that those officers can focus on preventing crimes and keeping neighborhoods safe. Police do their job best when they have trust and buy in from their communities. Jermaine is committed to building that trust.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Jermaine Johnson
Policing & criminal justice context

Improve our law enforcement presence

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Improve our law enforcement presence

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Walid Hakim

4 statements

Green · Governor · SC

Crime & victimization

As governor of South Carolina, Hakim would take many steps to restructure law enforcement. We have created an unnecessary burden on law enforcement by envisioning the “do it all cop.” Law enforcement, traffic enforcement, first responder to car crashes, first responder to attempted suicide, first r…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

As governor of South Carolina, Hakim would take many steps to restructure law enforcement. We have created an unnecessary burden on law enforcement by envisioning the “do it all cop.” Law enforcement, traffic enforcement, first responder to car crashes, first responder to attempted suicide, first responder to mental health emergencies, first responder to animal attacks, and the list goes on. Police were not trained to respond to every situation, yet they are expected to. This creates a dangerous situation for both law enforcement and the general public when we send people to do jobs they were not trained to do. By mandating the hiring, (academy) training, and employment of SLED social workers deployed with local law enforcement, we can allow police to get back to doing what they were hired to do: enforce laws. Social workers would respond to nonviolent mental health situations and work as a victims' advocate for domestic violence, child abuse/endangerment, mental health emergencies and rape. The social worker would complete paperwork related to these events and act as the victims advocate, which would allow police to get back to what they were trained to do more quickly: enforce the laws they were sworn to uphold.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Walid Hakim
Policing & criminal justice context

As governor of South Carolina, Hakim would offer grants for qualified citizens to purchase rifles for hunting or home protection. Each person would be required to take a gun safety course, submit to a background check, and evaluation to qualify for this voluntary grant. Military veterans and law enf…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Gun policy and firearms

Candidate campaign source

As governor of South Carolina, Hakim would offer grants for qualified citizens to purchase rifles for hunting or home protection. Each person would be required to take a gun safety course, submit to a background check, and evaluation to qualify for this voluntary grant. Military veterans and law enforcement would be excempt from the grant process, but can still apply. As a candidate, Hakim wants to make clear he has no intention of confiscating guns or implementing any additional restrictions that are in place.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

Every classroom in South Carolina would be equipped with spring safety locking, bullet-resistant doors. These upgrades would protect students and teachers without criminalizing young people or perpetuating the school-to-prison pipeline. The discipline of students should be managed by the school admi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Every classroom in South Carolina would be equipped with spring safety locking, bullet-resistant doors. These upgrades would protect students and teachers without criminalizing young people or perpetuating the school-to-prison pipeline. The discipline of students should be managed by the school administration and staff, unless law enforcement is requested. We do not need law enforcement inserting themselves when these situation can be resolved by school staff. Through smarter investment in infrastructure, education, and opportunity, Hakim envisions a South Carolina where schools are safe, nurturing, and built for every child’s success.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Policing & criminal justice context

• Reduce the $1+ billion spent annually on prisons by cutting recidivism.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: III. CRIMINAL JUSTICE, POLICING, & REFORM

Candidate campaign source

• Reduce the $1+ billion spent annually on prisons by cutting recidivism.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Carolina U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · SC

Policing & criminal justice context

Jenny believes safe communities are the foundation of strong communities. She will always stand with law enforcement and support policies that keep violent criminals off our streets. This includes ensuring our border is secure – stopping the flow of deadly drugs like fentanyl and criminal illegal al…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy

Candidate campaign source

Jenny believes safe communities are the foundation of strong communities. She will always stand with law enforcement and support policies that keep violent criminals off our streets. This includes ensuring our border is secure – stopping the flow of deadly drugs like fentanyl and criminal illegal aliens from harming our families, our neighborhoods, and our economy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jenny Costa Honeycutt — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Nancy Lacore

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · SC

Policing & criminal justice context

I am very concerned by what we have seen from ICE. We cannot have federal law enforcement brutalizing citizens and intimidating immigrant communities in the streets. I have a daughter who is a police officer, and I believe ICE needs to be held to the same standards as our local law enforcement. ICE …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy

Candidate campaign source

I am very concerned by what we have seen from ICE. We cannot have federal law enforcement brutalizing citizens and intimidating immigrant communities in the streets. I have a daughter who is a police officer, and I believe ICE needs to be held to the same standards as our local law enforcement. ICE officers must follow due process and should be required to wear body cameras, display badges and leave their faces uncovered. ICE facilities must be humane, sanitary and safe. It is un-American to allow people to be denied access to basic rights while being held in our care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

184 matching sponsorships or proposals · 95 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. April Cromer

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 6 · R–SC

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. April Cromer
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3523

Organized Retail Crime

Mar 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Lee Gilreath · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises organized retail theft offenses, allows aggregation over 90 days, and grades penalties by the stolen property’s value and repeat offenses.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 1 (2025-03-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported property offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. Burglary, larceny-theft and motor-vehicle theft are components of the FBI property-crime series. Fraud and identity theft are outside this property-crime series. A measure about one component is not evidence of a change in total or unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1) "Organized retail crime" means two or more people conspiring to commit theft of retail property from a retail establishment with the intent to sell, barter, exchange, or reenter such retail property into commerce for monetary or other gain. […] (4) "Theft" means to take possession of, carry away, transfer, or cause to be carried away the retail property of another with the intent to deprive the merchant of the possession, use, benefit, and value of the retail property. […] (1) commit organized retail crime, with a value exceeding two thousand dollars aggregated over a ninety-day period, with the intent to cause the retail property to be placed in the control of a retail property fence or other person in exchange for consideration; or (2) receive, possess, or sell retail property that has been taken or stolen in violation of item (1) while knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe the property is stolen. A person is guilty of this offense whether or not anyone is convicted of the property theft. […] (a) is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than three years, or both, if the value of the retail property is more than two thousand dollars but less than ten thousand dollars; (b) is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than ten thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both, if the value of the retail property is more than ten thousand dollars but less than twenty thousand dollars; (c) is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than twenty thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both, if the value of the retail property is more than twenty thousand dollars but less than fifty thousand dollars; (d) is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than twenty years, or both, if the value of the retail property is more than fifty thousand dollars; (2) for a second or subsequent offense, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, regardless of the value of the retail property in any offense, must be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than twenty years, or both; (3) for purposes of this section, multiple offenses occurring within a ninety-day period may be aggregated into a single count with the aggregated value used to determine the total value of the property;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 78 · D–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Beth E. Bernstein
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3587

Criminally negligent storage of firearms

Mar 10, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes criminal penalties when negligent firearm storage allows a child to access a loaded firearm, with higher penalties when a discharge causes death or serious injury and specified lawful-use and unlawful-entry defenses.

The official record’s latest entry is Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Schuessler (2025-03-10). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1) "Child" means a person younger than eighteen years of age. (2) "Criminal negligence" means the reckless disregard of the safety of others. […] (5) "Readily dischargeable firearm" means a firearm that is loaded with ammunition, whether or not a round is in the chamber. (6) "Secure" means to take steps that a reasonable person would take to prevent a child's access to a readily dischargeable firearm including, but not limited to, placing a firearm in a locked container or temporarily rendering the firearm inoperable by a trigger lock or other means. […] (B) A person commits an offense if a child gains access to a readily dischargeable firearm, and the person, with criminal negligence: (1) failed to secure the firearm; or (2) left the firearm in a manner that the person knew or should have known a child would be able to gain access to the firearm. (C) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the child's access to the firearm: (1) was supervised by a person eighteen years of age or older, and was for hunting, sporting, or other lawful purposes; (2) consisted of lawful defense by the child of people or property; or (3) was gained as the result of an unlawful entry by any person. (D)(1) Except as provided in item (2), a person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than one thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. (2) For violations of this section in which the child discharges the firearm and causes death or serious bodily injury to himself or another person, a person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than two thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than three years, or both.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Taylor

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 86 · R–SC

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Bill Taylor
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3650

Discharging firearms into dwellings and other structures

May 26, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises offenses and penalties for deliberately or recklessly firing into regularly occupied structures or occupied vehicles, including enhanced penalties when someone is struck or injured. The text preserves specified defense and hunting exceptions. Assault-related conduct is only one component of reported violent crime.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 138 (2026-05-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 16-23-440. (A) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (B) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into any vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. For purposes of this section an unmanned aerial vehicle shall not constitute an aircraft. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (C) A person who discharges or causes to be discharged a firearm in a criminally negligent manner while in preparation for, engaged in the act of, or returning from hunting, in violation of Section 50-1-85, cannot be charged with a violation of this section. Nothing however herein prohibits the charging of a violation under any other applicable section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3523

Organized Retail Crime

Mar 12, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Fawn M. Pedalino · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. J. David Weeks · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Lee Gilreath · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Charles V. Hartz · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises organized retail theft offenses, allows aggregation over 90 days, and grades penalties by the stolen property’s value and repeat offenses.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 1 (2025-03-12). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported property offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. Burglary, larceny-theft and motor-vehicle theft are components of the FBI property-crime series. Fraud and identity theft are outside this property-crime series. A measure about one component is not evidence of a change in total or unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1) "Organized retail crime" means two or more people conspiring to commit theft of retail property from a retail establishment with the intent to sell, barter, exchange, or reenter such retail property into commerce for monetary or other gain. […] (4) "Theft" means to take possession of, carry away, transfer, or cause to be carried away the retail property of another with the intent to deprive the merchant of the possession, use, benefit, and value of the retail property. […] (1) commit organized retail crime, with a value exceeding two thousand dollars aggregated over a ninety-day period, with the intent to cause the retail property to be placed in the control of a retail property fence or other person in exchange for consideration; or (2) receive, possess, or sell retail property that has been taken or stolen in violation of item (1) while knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe the property is stolen. A person is guilty of this offense whether or not anyone is convicted of the property theft. […] (a) is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than three years, or both, if the value of the retail property is more than two thousand dollars but less than ten thousand dollars; (b) is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than ten thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both, if the value of the retail property is more than ten thousand dollars but less than twenty thousand dollars; (c) is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than twenty thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both, if the value of the retail property is more than twenty thousand dollars but less than fifty thousand dollars; (d) is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than twenty years, or both, if the value of the retail property is more than fifty thousand dollars; (2) for a second or subsequent offense, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, regardless of the value of the retail property in any offense, must be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than twenty years, or both; (3) for purposes of this section, multiple offenses occurring within a ninety-day period may be aggregated into a single count with the aggregated value used to determine the total value of the property;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3094

Open Carry with Training Act

Jun 1, 2021 · Enacted

Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. T. Case Brittain, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy A. "Tim" McGinnis · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Historically allowed holders of valid concealed-weapon permits to carry openly, while preserving specified employer and property-owner restrictions. Later permitless-carry legislation is a separate action.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 66 (2021-06-01). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"(5) 'Concealable weapon' means a firearm having a length of less than twelve inches measured along its greatest dimension that may be carried openly on one's person or in a manner that is hidden from public view in normal wear of clothing except when needed for self defense, defense of others, and the protection of real or personal property." […] (b) carried openly or concealed on or about his person, and he has a valid concealed weapons permit pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23;" […] (1) the right of a public or private employer to prohibit a person who is licensed under this article from carrying a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon the premises of the business or work place or while using any machinery, vehicle, or equipment owned or operated by the business; (2) the right of a private property owner or person in legal possession or control to allow or prohibit the carrying of a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon his premises. (B) The posting by the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control of a sign stating 'NO CONCEALABLE WEAPONS ALLOWED' shall constitute notice to a person holding a permit issued pursuant to this article that the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control requests that concealable weapons, whether concealed or openly carried, not be brought upon the premises or into the work place. A person who brings a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, onto the premises or work place in violation of the provisions of this paragraph may be charged with a violation of Section 16-11-620. In addition to the penalties provided in Section 16-11-620, a person convicted of a second or subsequent violation of the provisions of this paragraph must have his permit revoked for a period of one year. The prohibition contained in this section does not apply to persons specified in Section 16-23-20, item (1).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brandon L. Cox

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 92 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brandon L. Cox
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brandon Newton

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 45 · R–SC

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brandon Newton
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3650

Discharging firearms into dwellings and other structures

May 26, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises offenses and penalties for deliberately or recklessly firing into regularly occupied structures or occupied vehicles, including enhanced penalties when someone is struck or injured. The text preserves specified defense and hunting exceptions. Assault-related conduct is only one component of reported violent crime.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 138 (2026-05-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 16-23-440. (A) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (B) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into any vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. For purposes of this section an unmanned aerial vehicle shall not constitute an aircraft. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (C) A person who discharges or causes to be discharged a firearm in a criminally negligent manner while in preparation for, engaged in the act of, or returning from hunting, in violation of Section 50-1-85, cannot be charged with a violation of this section. Nothing however herein prohibits the charging of a violation under any other applicable section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3360

Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence

Jun 26, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Creates a SLED Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence to provide training, education and expertise for law enforcement, schools and the public, contingent on appropriated funding.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 79 (2023-06-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 23-3-1500. (A) The Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence is established within the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). The purpose of the center is to provide extensive training, education, and expertise in the fields of school safety and targeted violence. (B) SLED shall adopt guidelines and establish procedures for training and educating local and state law enforcement, teachers, administrators, bus drivers, other school personnel, parents and the public on school safety and targeted violence. […] SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor and is contingent upon funding in the general appropriations act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3094

Open Carry with Training Act

Jun 1, 2021 · Enacted

Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. T. Case Brittain, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy A. "Tim" McGinnis · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Historically allowed holders of valid concealed-weapon permits to carry openly, while preserving specified employer and property-owner restrictions. Later permitless-carry legislation is a separate action.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 66 (2021-06-01). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"(5) 'Concealable weapon' means a firearm having a length of less than twelve inches measured along its greatest dimension that may be carried openly on one's person or in a manner that is hidden from public view in normal wear of clothing except when needed for self defense, defense of others, and the protection of real or personal property." […] (b) carried openly or concealed on or about his person, and he has a valid concealed weapons permit pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23;" […] (1) the right of a public or private employer to prohibit a person who is licensed under this article from carrying a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon the premises of the business or work place or while using any machinery, vehicle, or equipment owned or operated by the business; (2) the right of a private property owner or person in legal possession or control to allow or prohibit the carrying of a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon his premises. (B) The posting by the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control of a sign stating 'NO CONCEALABLE WEAPONS ALLOWED' shall constitute notice to a person holding a permit issued pursuant to this article that the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control requests that concealable weapons, whether concealed or openly carried, not be brought upon the premises or into the work place. A person who brings a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, onto the premises or work place in violation of the provisions of this paragraph may be charged with a violation of Section 16-11-620. In addition to the penalties provided in Section 16-11-620, a person convicted of a second or subsequent violation of the provisions of this paragraph must have his permit revoked for a period of one year. The prohibition contained in this section does not apply to persons specified in Section 16-23-20, item (1).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr.

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 39 · R–SC

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr.
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3650

Discharging firearms into dwellings and other structures

May 26, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises offenses and penalties for deliberately or recklessly firing into regularly occupied structures or occupied vehicles, including enhanced penalties when someone is struck or injured. The text preserves specified defense and hunting exceptions. Assault-related conduct is only one component of reported violent crime.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 138 (2026-05-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 16-23-440. (A) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (B) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into any vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. For purposes of this section an unmanned aerial vehicle shall not constitute an aircraft. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (C) A person who discharges or causes to be discharged a firearm in a criminally negligent manner while in preparation for, engaged in the act of, or returning from hunting, in violation of Section 50-1-85, cannot be charged with a violation of this section. Nothing however herein prohibits the charging of a violation under any other applicable section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3360

Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence

Jun 26, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Creates a SLED Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence to provide training, education and expertise for law enforcement, schools and the public, contingent on appropriated funding.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 79 (2023-06-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures reported violent offenses per 100,000 people, with incomplete and varying agency coverage. FBI violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Prevention, reporting or a specified offense concerns one component; this is distinct from homicide mortality, nonviolent offenses and all unreported crime. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 23-3-1500. (A) The Center for School Safety and Targeted Violence is established within the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). The purpose of the center is to provide extensive training, education, and expertise in the fields of school safety and targeted violence. (B) SLED shall adopt guidelines and establish procedures for training and educating local and state law enforcement, teachers, administrators, bus drivers, other school personnel, parents and the public on school safety and targeted violence. […] SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor and is contingent upon funding in the general appropriations act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3094

Open Carry with Training Act

Jun 1, 2021 · Enacted

Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. T. Case Brittain, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy A. "Tim" McGinnis · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Historically allowed holders of valid concealed-weapon permits to carry openly, while preserving specified employer and property-owner restrictions. Later permitless-carry legislation is a separate action.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 66 (2021-06-01). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"(5) 'Concealable weapon' means a firearm having a length of less than twelve inches measured along its greatest dimension that may be carried openly on one's person or in a manner that is hidden from public view in normal wear of clothing except when needed for self defense, defense of others, and the protection of real or personal property." […] (b) carried openly or concealed on or about his person, and he has a valid concealed weapons permit pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23;" […] (1) the right of a public or private employer to prohibit a person who is licensed under this article from carrying a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon the premises of the business or work place or while using any machinery, vehicle, or equipment owned or operated by the business; (2) the right of a private property owner or person in legal possession or control to allow or prohibit the carrying of a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon his premises. (B) The posting by the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control of a sign stating 'NO CONCEALABLE WEAPONS ALLOWED' shall constitute notice to a person holding a permit issued pursuant to this article that the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control requests that concealable weapons, whether concealed or openly carried, not be brought upon the premises or into the work place. A person who brings a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, onto the premises or work place in violation of the provisions of this paragraph may be charged with a violation of Section 16-11-620. In addition to the penalties provided in Section 16-11-620, a person convicted of a second or subsequent violation of the provisions of this paragraph must have his permit revoked for a period of one year. The prohibition contained in this section does not apply to persons specified in Section 16-23-20, item (1).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.