South Carolina · individual fact

South Carolina prices and inflation

Compare South Carolina’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide South Carolina CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level93.72024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.32024 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level80.52024 · #30 of 50 · highest first

South Carolina over time

Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 93.789.895.4101.1South Carolina, 2014: 93.2South Carolina, 2015: 93.3South Carolina, 2016: 93.6South Carolina, 2017: 92.8South Carolina, 2018: 92.2South Carolina, 2019: 91.5South Carolina, 2020: 90.9South Carolina, 2021: 93.6South Carolina, 2022: 93.3South Carolina, 2023: 93.5South Carolina, 2024: 93.7201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● South Carolina Legislature · 4● U.S. Congress · South Carolina delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 2■ South Carolina agencies · 12005-08-012026-06-30

7 of 7 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 7 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

South Carolina · 2024: 93.7 · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare South Carolina with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Carolina All-items price level · source units
PeriodSouth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
202493.7#32 of 50100
202393.5#29 of 50100
202293.3#29 of 50100
202193.6#29 of 50100
202090.9#42 of 50100
201991.5#42 of 50100
201892.2#35 of 50100
201792.8#34 of 50100
201693.6#33 of 50100
201593.3#33 of 50100
201493.2#35 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Carolina · state comparison

How does South Carolina’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

South Carolina · 202493.7
South Carolina rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare South Carolina with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
All-items price level history in South Carolina89.595.4101.420142024
2024 · South Carolina: 93.7 · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina All-items price level history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
201493.2
201593.3
201693.6
201792.8
201892.2
201991.5
202090.9
202193.6
202293.3
202393.5
202493.7

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 93.72024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina · your comparison93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

South Carolina · 20242.9%
South Carolina rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Annual change in regional price deflator history in South Carolina-0.9%3.7%8.3%20152024
2024 · South Carolina: 2.9% · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
20150.3%
20161.4%
20170.9%
20181.4%
20190.6%
20200.4%
20217.3%
20226.2%
20233.9%
20242.9%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 2.9%2024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina · your comparison2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

South Carolina · 2024$52,463
South Carolina rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Real personal income per person history in South Carolina$39.11K$50.56K$62.01K20142024
2024 · South Carolina: $52,463 · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Real personal income per person history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2014$41,750
2015$43,683
2016$44,377
2017$45,761
2018$46,643
2019$48,823
2020$51,406
2021$52,444
2022$50,407
2023$51,320
2024$52,463

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $52,4632024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina · your comparison$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

12 statements from 8 candidates

2026 South Carolina Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Walid Hakim

1 statement

Green · Governor · SC

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

To keep housing affordable and communities strong, Hakim would limit property ownership to twelve residential properties per corporation or individual, excluding apartment complexes.This policy ensures that homes remain in the hands of residents, not investors, preventing mass buyouts that drive up …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

To keep housing affordable and communities strong, Hakim would limit property ownership to twelve residential properties per corporation or individual, excluding apartment complexes.This policy ensures that homes remain in the hands of residents, not investors, preventing mass buyouts that drive up housing costs and displace families. By curbing speculative ownership, South Carolina can stabilize neighborhoods, lower rents, and make homeownership attainable again for working people across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Carolina U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Nancy Lacore

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · SC

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Allow Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices and ensure every American benefits from these negotiations. Rapidly expand the number of drugs that Medicare negotiates.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

Allow Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices and ensure every American benefits from these negotiations. Rapidly expand the number of drugs that Medicare negotiates.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Carolina U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Sheri Biggs

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · SC

CPI / inflation mention

The Biden Administration and the career politicians’ excessive and wasteful spending have not only fueled inflation but also greatly harmed our children, grandchildren, and future generations with unconscionable debt. As our next Congresswoman, Sheri will fight for fiscal responsibility, accountabil…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The Biden Administration and the career politicians’ excessive and wasteful spending have not only fueled inflation but also greatly harmed our children, grandchildren, and future generations with unconscionable debt. As our next Congresswoman, Sheri will fight for fiscal responsibility, accountability, and transparency of our hard-earned tax dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Sheri Biggs — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 77 · D–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3226

Minimum wage

Jan 14, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Kambrell H. Garvin · Sponsored / Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter · Named bill author

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes a phased hourly minimum wage of $8.75 in 2026, $9.75 in 2027 and $10.10 in 2028, followed by inflation adjustments. It applies to workers eligible under the federal minimum-wage framework.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry (House Journal-page 135) (2025-01-14). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 41-1-125. (A) An employer shall, at a minimum, pay employees a wage at an hourly rate as provided in this section for all hours worked in this State. Only those individuals entitled to receive the federal minimum wage under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and its implementing regulations are eligible to receive this state minimum wage. The provisions of Sections 213 and 214 of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as interpreted by applicable federal regulations and implemented by the United States Secretary of Labor, are incorporated herein. (B) The minimum wage must be implemented as follows: (1) Beginning January 1, 2026, the initial state minimum wage is established as eight dollars and seventy five cents per hour. (2) Beginning January 1, 2027, the state minimum wage increases to nine dollars and seventy five cents per hour. (3) Beginning January 1, 2028, the state minimum wage increases to ten dollars and ten cents per hour. (4) Beginning January 1, 2029, and annually thereafter, the state minimum wage increases from ten dollars and ten cents per hour based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, not seasonally adjusted, for the South Region or a successor index as calculated by the United States Department of Labor. The Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation annually shall calculate and post the adjusted state minimum wage rate and the effective date on the internet website of the department before October fifteenth of each year. To the extent funded in the annual general appropriations act, the department annually shall provide written notice of the adjusted rate and the effective date of the adjusted state minimum wage to all employers by November fifteenth.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Marvin “Mark” Smith

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 99 · –SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Marvin “Mark” Smith
South Carolina Legislature · H. 5419

Motor fuel user fee suspension

Mar 26, 2026 · Referred to Ways and Means · not enacted

Rep. Marvin “Mark” Smith · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H. 5419 proposed a 30-day suspension of South Carolina’s gasoline and diesel user fee and road tax. The official record shows committee referral and no enactment.

Referred to House Ways and Means on March 25, 2026. The last listed action is a sponsor addition on March 26; no passage or enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026.

Why this record is included

H. 5419 proposed suspending the gasoline and diesel motor-fuel user fee and road tax for 30 days following approval, then reinstating the statutory rates. It addresses a tax included in South Carolina pump prices. The official history records committee referral and later sponsor additions, with no enactment; the proposal did not establish a tax holiday or lower the measured regional price.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Lower Atlantic regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1 would suspend the motor-fuel user fee and road tax for thirty days, then reinstate the rates set by law. Section 2 requires governor approval for effectiveness.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Shane R. Martin

South Carolina Senate · District 13 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Shane R. Martin
South Carolina Legislature · SB 933

Legislative compensation

Jun 5, 2026 · Enacted

Sen. Shane R. Martin · Sponsored / Sen. Thomas D. "Tom" Corbin · Named bill author / Sen. Kent M. Williams · Named bill author / Sen. Darrell Jackson · Named bill author / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Named bill author / Sen. Brad Hutto · Named bill author / Sen. Tameika Isaac Devine · Named bill author / Sen. Jeffrey R. Graham · Named bill author / Sen. Jeff Zell · Named bill author / Sen. Overture Walker · Named bill author

FactVote reviewed summary

Sets legislative compensation and a separate in-district service allowance beginning with the 128th General Assembly, with capped inflation adjustments and written acceptance of increased compensation. Expense allowances are distinct from salary.

The official record’s latest dated entry is Effective date 05/18/26 (2026-06-05). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 2-3-20. (A) Beginning with the 128th General Assembly, members of the General Assembly shall annually receive as legislative compensation fifteen thousand dollars at a daily remuneration rate in accordance with Article III, Section 9 of the State Constitution and an in-district legislative service allowance of thirty-two thousand five hundred dollars as adjusted pursuant to subsection (C). Members of the General Assembly shall also receive mileage at the rate provided for by law for the actual distance traveled in the most direct route going to and returning from their homes on weekend adjournments of the General Assembly at the place where the sessions of the General Assembly are held. The terms of this provision shall be subject to limitations imposed by the State Constitution. […] (C) The legislative compensation and the in-district legislative service allowance provided for in subsection (A) shall be adjusted biennially after elections for the House of Representatives by an amount equal to the increase of the consumer price index using the chained methodology during the two previous years not to exceed five percent. The Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Authority shall calculate the biennial adjustment, publish it on its website, and transmit the amount of the adjustment to the Senate and the House of Representatives prior to the second Tuesday in January in the appropriate years. (D) For the members of the 128th General Assembly, to be eligible to receive the increased compensation, as compared to the 126th General Assembly, set forth in subsection (A), as adjusted by subsection (C), a member must file a written statement accepting the increase with the Clerk of the House of Representatives or the Clerk of the Senate, as applicable. A member who does not file a statement of acceptance remains entitled to receive compensation in the same amount as a member of the 126th General Assembly received. A member's filing or failure to file a statement of acceptance may not be based on, conditioned upon, or affected by the member's vote for the increase allowed in subsection (A).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.