Pennsylvania · individual fact

Pennsylvania prices and inflation

Compare Pennsylvania’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Pennsylvania CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level97.62024 · #23 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level99.42024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level85.12024 · #26 of 50 · highest first

Pennsylvania over time

Explore Pennsylvania readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Pennsylvania officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Pennsylvania effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Pennsylvania change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Pennsylvania · source units
PennsylvaniaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 97.695.198.1101Pennsylvania, 2014: 97.2Pennsylvania, 2015: 98.1Pennsylvania, 2016: 97.8Pennsylvania, 2017: 99.1Pennsylvania, 2018: 98.2Pennsylvania, 2019: 98Pennsylvania, 2020: 97.7Pennsylvania, 2021: 96.1Pennsylvania, 2022: 96.3Pennsylvania, 2023: 97.4Pennsylvania, 2024: 97.6201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Pennsylvania Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · Pennsylvania delegation · 3◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Pennsylvania agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-06-30

5 of 5 reviewed Pennsylvania actions match · 5 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Pennsylvania · 2024: 97.6 · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Pennsylvania with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Pennsylvania All-items price level · source units
PeriodPennsylvaniaRankU.S. benchmark
202497.6#23 of 50100
202397.4#22 of 50100
202296.3#24 of 50100
202196.1#23 of 50100
202097.7#22 of 50100
201998#22 of 50100
201898.2#20 of 50100
201799.1#19 of 50100
201697.8#21 of 50100
201598.1#20 of 50100
201497.2#25 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Pennsylvania · state comparison

How does Pennsylvania’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Pennsylvania · 202497.6
Pennsylvania rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Pennsylvania with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Pennsylvania
All-items price level history in Pennsylvania95.698.1100.620142024
2024 · Pennsylvania: 97.6 · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Pennsylvania All-items price level history
PeriodPennsylvaniaCompare
201497.2
201598.1
201697.8
201799.1
201898.2
201998
202097.7
202196.1
202296.3
202397.4
202497.6

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Pennsylvania stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Pennsylvania has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Pennsylvania · 97.62024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Pennsylvania with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania · your comparison97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Pennsylvania · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Pennsylvania · 20242.8%
Pennsylvania rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Pennsylvania
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Pennsylvania-0.8%3.4%7.6%20152024
2024 · Pennsylvania: 2.8% · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Pennsylvania Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodPennsylvaniaCompare
20151.2%
20160.6%
20173.1%
20181.1%
20191.3%
20200.8%
20212.4%
20226.7%
20235%
20242.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Pennsylvania stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Pennsylvania has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Pennsylvania · 2.8%2024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Pennsylvania with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania · your comparison2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Pennsylvania · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Pennsylvania · 2024$58,620
Pennsylvania rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Pennsylvania
Real personal income per person history in Pennsylvania$45.63K$54.44K$63.25K20142024
2024 · Pennsylvania: $58,620 · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Pennsylvania Real personal income per person history
PeriodPennsylvaniaCompare
2014$50,343
2015$51,702
2016$52,744
2017$52,479
2018$54,492
2019$55,458
2020$59,098
2021$61,217
2022$58,304
2023$58,027
2024$58,620

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Pennsylvania stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Pennsylvania has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Pennsylvania · $58,6202024 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Pennsylvania with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania · your comparison$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Pennsylvania candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

19 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Pennsylvania Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Stacy Garrity

2 statements

Republican · Governor · PA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Expanding the Commonwealth’s energy infrastructure will increase in-state generation capacity, ensuring reliable and affordable energy while improving the grid. This will reduce exposure to volatile regional pricing, lower the overall cost of living, and make housing, food, goods, and services more …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Turn Around PA Plan

Candidate campaign source

Expanding the Commonwealth’s energy infrastructure will increase in-state generation capacity, ensuring reliable and affordable energy while improving the grid. This will reduce exposure to volatile regional pricing, lower the overall cost of living, and make housing, food, goods, and services more affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Stacy Garrity — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Stacy Garrity
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

During the Special Session on Energy Affordability, the Garrity-Richey Administration will cut taxes and eliminate hidden costs on electric bills, roll back or eliminate the gross receipts tax on utilities, end tax stacking on energy bills, require full transparency of all taxes and surcharges, and …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Turn Around PA Plan

Candidate campaign source

During the Special Session on Energy Affordability, the Garrity-Richey Administration will cut taxes and eliminate hidden costs on electric bills, roll back or eliminate the gross receipts tax on utilities, end tax stacking on energy bills, require full transparency of all taxes and surcharges, and fast-track bringing new power plants online to meet demand and keep costs low. We will replace consumption taxes with production-driven growth and slash utility bills by 15% to 25%.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Stacy Garrity — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Pennsylvania U.S. House District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Bob Harvie

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · PA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

That’s why I’m calling for a moratorium on new data center development in our community. Before we approve another data center, we need to know that energy costs won’t be passed on to ratepayers, how much water and electricity it will consume, and how many long-term local jobs it will actually creat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Bob Harvie’s New Fair Deal for Working Families

Candidate campaign source

That’s why I’m calling for a moratorium on new data center development in our community. Before we approve another data center, we need to know that energy costs won’t be passed on to ratepayers, how much water and electricity it will consume, and how many long-term local jobs it will actually create.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Bob Harvie campaign source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Bob Harvie
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Healthcare should be a right, not a privilege. We have the best healthcare professionals in the world – but only if you can afford it. That’s a problem. That’s not good enough. No one should delay seeing a doctor because they’re worried about the bill. No family should go bankrupt because someone ge…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Bob Harvie’s New Fair Deal for Working Families

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare should be a right, not a privilege. We have the best healthcare professionals in the world – but only if you can afford it. That’s a problem. That’s not good enough. No one should delay seeing a doctor because they’re worried about the bill. No family should go bankrupt because someone gets sick. America leads the world in medical innovation, yet too many people still struggle to afford the care they need. Every American deserves the security of knowing they’ll receive quality care when they need it. Millions of Americans rely on Affordable Care Act premium tax credits to keep their health insurance within reach. I’ll fight to permanently restore and expand those tax credits so families don’t wake up to hundreds of dollars in higher monthly premiums simply because Congress failed to act. I believe we need to lower the age that Americans can buy into Medicare from 65 to 55. Unlike Brian Fitzpatrick, who voted against lowering the cost of prescription medications for seniors, I’ll expand Medicare’s authority to negotiate prescription drug prices, cap insulin costs, and take on pharmaceutical companies that put profits ahead of patients.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Bob Harvie campaign source 2 ↗

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · PA

CPI / inflation mention

I will always stand to protect the benefits our seniors are owed. Make no mistake, it’s your money, and I am absolutely committed to protecting the benefits you earned. Our seniors also deserve a fairer, enhanced COLA (CPI-E) so that benefits are not diminished by rising costs in goods and services …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Protecting Medicare & Social Security

Candidate campaign source

I will always stand to protect the benefits our seniors are owed. Make no mistake, it’s your money, and I am absolutely committed to protecting the benefits you earned. Our seniors also deserve a fairer, enhanced COLA (CPI-E) so that benefits are not diminished by rising costs in goods and services that disproportionately affect seniors. Furthermore, we must also protect the medical expense tax deduction to allow individuals to deduct high out-of-pocket medical costs from their taxable income.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Brian Fitzpatrick — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗

2026 Pennsylvania U.S. House District 10 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Janelle Stelson

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 10 · PA

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

I believe that local communities and their leadership should have the right to approve or reject a data center project without getting sued by big corporations. Data centers should not simply be dropped into the middle of our neighborhoods, driving up utility prices, polluting water, creating noise …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Priorities — For Central Pennsylvanians

Candidate campaign source

I believe that local communities and their leadership should have the right to approve or reject a data center project without getting sued by big corporations. Data centers should not simply be dropped into the middle of our neighborhoods, driving up utility prices, polluting water, creating noise pollution and lowering property values for hardworking families. If communities do not want them, they should not be built.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Janelle Stelson campaign source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Janelle Stelson
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

I support tax breaks for the hard-working middle class, not billionaires. I support no tax on tips or overtime and would vote to make that permanent. We need bipartisan problem-solving to pass laws that lower the cost of necessities— including food, gas, housing, utility costs, prescription drugs an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Priorities — For Central Pennsylvanians

Candidate campaign source

I support tax breaks for the hard-working middle class, not billionaires. I support no tax on tips or overtime and would vote to make that permanent. We need bipartisan problem-solving to pass laws that lower the cost of necessities— including food, gas, housing, utility costs, prescription drugs and more. I will repeal these tariff taxes that are increasing costs and vote to end the war in Iran. And we must address the national deficit, which has reached $41 trillion under Perry’s leadership. I will prioritize cutting wasteful government spending and make sure your taxpayer dollars are not abused.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Janelle Stelson campaign source 2 ↗

Scott Perry

4 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 10 · PA

CPI / inflation mention

As a former small business owner, Scott Perry understands that excessive taxes and over-regulation prevent small businesses from creating jobs and prospering.Inflation, the economy, and jobs continue to concern most Americans. Biden-Harris and the radical Left’s spending increases have spiked inflat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Get Campaign Updates

Candidate campaign source

As a former small business owner, Scott Perry understands that excessive taxes and over-regulation prevent small businesses from creating jobs and prospering.Inflation, the economy, and jobs continue to concern most Americans. Biden-Harris and the radical Left’s spending increases have spiked inflation, weakened the economy, eliminated well-paying jobs, and ruined small businesses.Scott opposes Biden-Harris’ tax-and-spend increases on small businesses and working families. He’ll continue to fight for:A Balanced Budget AmendmentLess government regulationReducing the National debtLowering taxes on families and small businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Scott Perry
CPI / inflation mention

Inflation, the economy, and jobs continue to concern most Americans. Biden-Harris and the radical Left’s spending increases have spiked inflation, weakened the economy, eliminated well-paying jobs, and ruined small businesses.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Inflation, the economy, and jobs continue to concern most Americans. Biden-Harris and the radical Left’s spending increases have spiked inflation, weakened the economy, eliminated well-paying jobs, and ruined small businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
CPI / inflation mention

Scott Perry firmly believes that we can balance our Nation’s energy needs while still protecting our environment. The Biden-Harris anti-American energy policies threaten our National security and have ruined our economy. America must be energy independent to grow our economy and maintain our securit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy and environment

Candidate campaign source

Scott Perry firmly believes that we can balance our Nation’s energy needs while still protecting our environment. The Biden-Harris anti-American energy policies threaten our National security and have ruined our economy. America must be energy independent to grow our economy and maintain our security. Pennsylvania plays a critical role in returning America to energy independence by supporting our vast natural gas reserves and harnessing hydroelectric and nuclear power.Scott Perry supports a blended energy portfolio that includes the development of clean energy technologies and using our vast energy resources – to reduce our dependence on foreign energy, turn around the economy, create jobs, reduce inflation, make energy more affordable, and preserve our environment.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
CPI / inflation mention

Scott Perry supports a blended energy portfolio that includes the development of clean energy technologies and using our vast energy resources – to reduce our dependence on foreign energy, turn around the economy, create jobs, reduce inflation, make energy more affordable, and preserve our environme…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Scott Perry supports a blended energy portfolio that includes the development of clean energy technologies and using our vast energy resources – to reduce our dependence on foreign energy, turn around the economy, create jobs, reduce inflation, make energy more affordable, and preserve our environment.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Scott Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Pennsylvania candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Pennsylvania incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Pennsylvania legislators and Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Pennsylvania’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Pennsylvania incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Brian K. Fitzpatrick

U.S. representative for Pennsylvania, District 1 · R–PA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brian K. Fitzpatrick
U.S. Congress · Pennsylvania delegation · H.R.3438

Fair Wage Act of 2025

May 15, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Brian K. Fitzpatrick · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on Pennsylvania's median household income.

Retained Pennsylvania evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Perez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and WorkforceA BILLTo amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for a Federal, cost-of-living based minimum wage, and for other purposes. 1.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Christopher R. Deluzio

U.S. representative for Pennsylvania, District 17 · D–PA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Christopher R. Deluzio
U.S. Congress · Pennsylvania delegation · H.R.8135

Cost-of-living Emergency Act

Mar 27, 2026 · Introduced

Rep. Christopher R. Deluzio · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, the Budget, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Pennsylvania's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Pennsylvania evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Actions to be taken by the Council of Economic Advisers during a cost-of-living emergency During the period that the emergency declared under section 3 is in effect, the President, acting through the Chair of the Council, shall undertake the following actions: (1) Updated advisory mandate In carrying out the duties described in section 10(c) of the Employment Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1023(c)), the Council shall prioritize economic analysis and advice addressing the following subjects: (A) The affordability of basic…
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Mike Kelly

U.S. representative for Pennsylvania, District 16 · R–PA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Mike Kelly
U.S. Congress · Pennsylvania delegation · H.R.2854

Neighborhood Homes Investment Act

Apr 10, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Mike Kelly · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Pennsylvania's displayed renewable-generation share.

Retained Pennsylvania evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

For purposes of the preceding sentence, in applying section 267(b) or 707(b)(1), 10 percent shall be substituted for 50 percent. (7) Inflation adjustment (A) In general In the case of a calendar year after 2025, the dollar amounts in subsections (b)(3)(A), (e)(3)(A)(i)(I), (e)(3)(A)(i)(II), and (i)(2)(C) shall each be increased by an amount equal to— (i) such dollar amount, multiplied by (ii) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar year by substituting calendar year 2024…
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Nikki Rivera

Pennsylvania House · District 96 · D–PA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Nikki Rivera
Pennsylvania Legislature · HB 2380

An Act amending Title 66 (Public Utilities) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in restructuring of electric utility industry, providing for energy storage procurement.

Jun 17, 2026 · Re-committed to RULES, June 17, 2026

Rep. Nikki Rivera · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Reducing utility bills by utilizing grid-scale battery storage. An Act amending Title 66 (Public Utilities) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in restructuring of electric utility industry, providing for energy storage procurement.

The latest official Pennsylvania General Assembly record shows this action on June 17, 2026: Re-committed to RULES, June 17, 2026.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Pennsylvania's displayed renewable-generation share.

Retained Pennsylvania evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Reducing utility bills by utilizing grid-scale battery storage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Tina M. Davis

Pennsylvania House · District 141 · D–PA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Tina M. Davis
Pennsylvania Legislature · HB 2570

An Act amending the act of December 3, 1959 (P.L.1688, No.621), known as the Housing Finance Agency Law, in Pennsylvania Housing Affordability and Rehabilitation Enhancement Program, providing for the COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Grant Program.

Jun 15, 2020 · Referred to URBAN AFFAIRS, June 15, 2020 [House]

Rep. Tina M. Davis · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply.

The latest official Pennsylvania General Assembly record shows this action on June 15, 2020: Referred to URBAN AFFAIRS, June 15, 2020 [House].

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply. It does not establish an effect on Pennsylvania's median gross rent.

Retained Pennsylvania evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

An Act amending the act of December 3, 1959 (P.L.1688, No.621), known as the Housing Finance Agency Law, in Pennsylvania Housing Affordability and Rehabilitation Enhancement Program, providing for the COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Grant Program.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Pennsylvania officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Pennsylvania statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 3, 2026.