Attorney General Rayfield Intervenes to Protect Onshore Wind Energy Projects
Jul 16, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Dan Rayfield · Moved to intervene
FactVote reviewed summary
Sought to intervene against the federal freeze on reviews of land-based wind projects, including Oregon projects. These projects concern the total in-state generation denominator.
Reported 2026-07-16. This records the dated action; litigation and proposed settlements do not establish final liability or current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Hydroelectric share is hydroelectric electricity-industry net generation divided by total in-state generation covered by EIA Table 5. The denominator excludes estimated small-scale generation outside that table. Hydroelectric plants or other in-state generation resources concern this mix; procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from an operating plant or measured output. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Oregon evidence context: Hydroelectric share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
eneral Dan Rayfield is fighting back against a Pentagon freeze that’s blocking wind energy projects nationwide, including here in Oregon. AG Rayfield filed a motion along with 18 other attorneys general intervening in a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and Secretary Pete Hegseth, arguing that DoD unlawfully stopped routine reviews of land-based wind projects. “Oregonians are counting on these wind projects for good paying jobs and cleaner energy,” said Attorney General Rayfield. “The federal administration’s actions are unfair and unlawful, and we’re fighting to keep Oregonians’ energy priorities moving forward.” Attorney General Rayfield and the coalition are asking the court to set aside DoD’s unlawful freeze and order the agency to resume the review process required by federal law. Under federal law, land-based wind project developers must submit any proposed projects with wind turbines over 200 feet tall to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for review. The FAA then refers these projects to DoD to assess whether they could affect military operations, radar systems, flight paths, or national security. For more than a decade, DoD engaged in a predictable review process and worked with developers to mitigate potential concerns. Mitigation measures often included changes to turbine placement or height, radar upgrades, or agreements to pause generation under certain circumstances. Around August 2025, DoD abruptly stopped following this process. Officials ceased countersigning mitigation agreements, stopped sending completed agreements to developers for signature, and delayed or halted communications with developers about mitigation. As a result, wind projects across the country have been frozen at various stages of the review process, including those that had already completed mitigation negotReview official supporting evidence ↗