Oregon · individual fact

Oregon unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate4.3%2024 · #10 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents2,098,2042024 · #25 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer2.2%2025 · 11-month average · #2 of 50 · highest first

Oregon over time

Explore Oregon readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Oregon officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Oregon effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Oregon change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Oregon · source units
OregonPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 4.3%2.7%5.7%8.6%Oregon, 2015: 5.5%Oregon, 2016: 4.8%Oregon, 2017: 4.1%Oregon, 2018: 4%Oregon, 2019: 3.7%Oregon, 2020: 7.6%Oregon, 2021: 5.2%Oregon, 2022: 4%Oregon, 2023: 3.8%Oregon, 2024: 4.3%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 15National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Oregon Legislature · 6● U.S. Congress · Oregon delegation · 1◆ Governor · 3■ Oregon agencies · 32015-12-012026-09-30

13 of 13 reviewed Oregon actions match · 13 date markers shown. 15 major events shown separately.

Oregon · 2024: 4.3% · Rank #10 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Oregon Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodOregonRankU.S. benchmark
20244.3%#10 of 504%
20233.8%#13 of 50Not available
20224%#11 of 50Not available
20215.2%#20 of 50Not available
20207.6%#22 of 50Not available
20193.7%#17 of 50Not available
20184%#17 of 50Not available
20174.1%#27 of 50Not available
20164.8%#25 of 50Not available
20155.5%#17 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Oregon · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Oregon · 20244.3%
Oregon rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oregon
Annual unemployment rate history in Oregon3.1%5.6%8.2%20152024
2024 · Oregon: 4.3% · Rank #10 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oregon Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodOregonCompare
20155.5%
20164.8%
20174.1%
20184%
20193.7%
20207.6%
20215.2%
20224%
20233.8%
20244.3%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oregon stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oregon has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oregon · 4.3%2024 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oregon with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon · your comparison4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oregon · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Oregon · 2025 · 11-month average2.2%
Oregon rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oregon stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oregon has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oregon · 2.2%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oregon with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon · your comparison2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oregon · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Oregon · 20251.4%
Oregon rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oregon
Annual real GDP growth history in Oregon-3.3%2.1%7.5%20152025
2025 · Oregon: 1.4% · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oregon Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodOregonCompare
20155%
20164.5%
20175%
20183.9%
20192.3%
2020-1.6%
20216%
20220.7%
20231.2%
20242.4%
20251.4%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oregon stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oregon has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oregon · 1.4%2025 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oregon with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon · your comparison1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oregon · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Oregon · December 202572,000
Oregon rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oregon
Openings · number history in Oregon-995,0003,620,0008,235,000July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Oregon: 72,000 · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oregon Openings · number history
PeriodOregonCompare
July 202584,000
August 202576,000
September 202580,000
October 202579,000
November 202570,000
December 202572,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oregon stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oregon has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oregon · 72,000December 2025 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oregon with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon · your comparison72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Oregon candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

28 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Oregon Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Christine Drazan

2 statements

Republican · Governor · OR

Jobs & workforce context

Develop Oregon's workforce by expanding apprenticeships and CTE, aligning workforce development programs and our schools with employer needs, measuring success through job placement and wage growth and accelerating occupational license recognition.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Develop Oregon's workforce by expanding apprenticeships and CTE, aligning workforce development programs and our schools with employer needs, measuring success through job placement and wage growth and accelerating occupational license recognition.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Christine Drazan
Jobs & workforce context

Hold government accountable for economic results by publishing a scorecard measuring private-sector job growth, business formation, permit timelines, industrial site readiness, exports, energy costs, housing production and labor force participation.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Hold government accountable for economic results by publishing a scorecard measuring private-sector job growth, business formation, permit timelines, industrial site readiness, exports, energy costs, housing production and labor force participation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Tina Kotek

2 statements

Democratic · Governor · OR

Jobs & workforce context

Strengthen access to mental-health and addiction treatment and implement recommendations to grow the behavioral-health workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Behavioral Health

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen access to mental-health and addiction treatment and implement recommendations to grow the behavioral-health workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Tina Kotek — Part 79 verified source ↗
View 1 more statement from Tina Kotek
Jobs & workforce context

Accelerate K-12 career and technical education and invest in colleges, universities, apprenticeships, and employer career pathways.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Workforce Pipeline

Candidate campaign source

Accelerate K-12 career and technical education and invest in colleges, universities, apprenticeships, and employer career pathways.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Tina Kotek — Part 79 verified source ↗

2026 Oregon U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Suzanne Bonamici

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · OR

Jobs & workforce context

In Northwest Oregon, the warming ocean, droughts, more frequent extreme weather events, wildfires, and hazardous smoke increasingly threaten the environment, economy, and public health. I’m proud of our work to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest climate investment in history. This transfo…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

In Northwest Oregon, the warming ocean, droughts, more frequent extreme weather events, wildfires, and hazardous smoke increasingly threaten the environment, economy, and public health. I’m proud of our work to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest climate investment in history. This transformative bill supports an equitable transition to renewable energy and creates good paying jobs in emerging industries. But that work is under attack now. Congress should be taking meaningful action to confront the climate crisis, but we are now in defense and trying to save whatever programs we can to help with a just transition to renewable energy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
View 3 more statements from Suzanne Bonamici
Jobs & workforce context

Invest in apprenticeships and workforce development: As a member of the Committee on Education and Workforce, I know that everyone deserves a path to success – and I also understand that not everyone is on the same path. The job market is changing, and we must create a path to a good job for all wor…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Invest in apprenticeships and workforce development: As a member of the Committee on Education and Workforce, I know that everyone deserves a path to success – and I also understand that not everyone is on the same path. The job market is changing, and we must create a path to a good job for all workers, especially women and people of color who have historically faced barriers to employment. I’m focused on expanding workforce training and Registered Apprenticeships here in Oregon and across the country to prepare for the future of work and respond to local workforce needs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Invest in infrastructure: With Democratic leadership, Congress passed a massive bipartisan investment in infrastructure that is helping Oregonians and Americans find good jobs building and maintaining roads, bridges, public transit, ports, water systems, schools, broadband, and electric grids. By re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Invest in infrastructure: With Democratic leadership, Congress passed a massive bipartisan investment in infrastructure that is helping Oregonians and Americans find good jobs building and maintaining roads, bridges, public transit, ports, water systems, schools, broadband, and electric grids. By retrofitting buildings and increasing energy efficiency, we can create good jobs and save energy and money while helping to address the climate crisis.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

To solve our housing crisis, we must immediately increase the supply of affordable housing. I’ve secured more than $6.25 million in funding to build hundreds of affordable housing units in NW Oregon. I’m also working to increase funding for the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) to incentivize th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

To solve our housing crisis, we must immediately increase the supply of affordable housing. I’ve secured more than $6.25 million in funding to build hundreds of affordable housing units in NW Oregon. I’m also working to increase funding for the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) to incentivize the construction of more affordable housing. Access to a living wage job, job training opportunities, and universal health care will also help people who are unhoused.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗

2026 Oregon U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Chris Beck

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · OR

Jobs & workforce context

Establish a rural service corps—teams of young and mid-career professional outdoor workers in each rural county devoted to rehabilitating and nurturing our forests and watersheds. (I see similar teams aiding in the health and dignity of our senior populations and helping children learn to read by th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Forests, wildfire resilience, water, and rural land use

Candidate campaign source

Establish a rural service corps—teams of young and mid-career professional outdoor workers in each rural county devoted to rehabilitating and nurturing our forests and watersheds. (I see similar teams aiding in the health and dignity of our senior populations and helping children learn to read by the 3rd grade.) These will be good-paying jobs with benefits that AI can’t do, and team members will become vital residents, consumers and family builders in our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Beck — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Oregon candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Oregon incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Oregon legislators and Oregon’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Oregon’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

14 matching sponsorships or proposals · 12 Oregon incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Alek Skarlatos

Oregon House of Representatives, District 4 · R–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Alek Skarlatos
Oregon Legislature · HB 4109

Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.

Mar 6, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Alek Skarlatos · Sponsored / Rep. Lucetta Elmer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 4109 (2026R1): Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.

2026-03-06: In committee upon adjournment. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ben Bowman

Oregon House of Representatives, District 25 · D–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ben Bowman
Oregon Legislature · SB 916

Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.

Jun 24, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Kathleen Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Dacia Grayber · Sponsored / Rep. Ben Bowman · Sponsored / Sen. Wlnsvey Campos · Sponsored / Sen. James I. Manning Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of SB 916 (2025R1): Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.

2025-07-02: Effective date, January 1, 2026. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Dacia Grayber

Oregon House of Representatives, District 28 · D–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Dacia Grayber
Oregon Legislature · SB 916

Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.

Jun 24, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Kathleen Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Dacia Grayber · Sponsored / Rep. Ben Bowman · Sponsored / Sen. Wlnsvey Campos · Sponsored / Sen. James I. Manning Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of SB 916 (2025R1): Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.

2025-07-02: Effective date, January 1, 2026. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. David Gomberg

Oregon House of Representatives, District 10 · D–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. David Gomberg
Oregon Legislature · HB 4134

Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.

Apr 17, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Lucetta Elmer · Sponsored / Rep. David Gomberg · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Helfrich · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 4134 (2024R1): Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.

2024-04-18: Chapter 103, (2024 Laws): Effective date April 17, 2024. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oregon’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Jeff Helfrich

Oregon House of Representatives, District 52 · R–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jeff Helfrich
Oregon Legislature · HB 4134

Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.

Apr 17, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Lucetta Elmer · Sponsored / Rep. David Gomberg · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Helfrich · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 4134 (2024R1): Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.

2024-04-18: Chapter 103, (2024 Laws): Effective date April 17, 2024. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oregon’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Lucetta Elmer

Oregon House of Representatives, District 24 · R–OR

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Lucetta Elmer
Oregon Legislature · HB 4109

Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.

Mar 6, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Alek Skarlatos · Sponsored / Rep. Lucetta Elmer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 4109 (2026R1): Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.

2026-03-06: In committee upon adjournment. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Oregon Legislature · HB 4134

Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.

Apr 17, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Lucetta Elmer · Sponsored / Rep. David Gomberg · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Helfrich · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 4134 (2024R1): Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.

2024-04-18: Chapter 103, (2024 Laws): Effective date April 17, 2024. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oregon’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requires the Oregon Business Development Department to provide grants to cities for specified infrastructure projects that will benefit housing developments that will make at least 30 percent of the dwelling units affordable to workforce income households.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Oregon officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Oregon statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.