Oregon · individual fact

Oregon income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Oregon’s tax structure.

Median household income$83.01K2020–2024 · #18 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$45.61K2020–2024 · #17 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$55.45K2024 · #36 of 50 · highest first

Oregon over time

Explore Oregon readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Oregon officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Oregon effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Oregon change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Oregon · source units
OregonPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $55,451$41.1K$51.21K$61.32KOregon, 2014: $43,053Oregon, 2015: $44,964Oregon, 2016: $46,550Oregon, 2017: $46,985Oregon, 2018: $47,109Oregon, 2019: $48,660Oregon, 2020: $52,577Oregon, 2021: $55,852Oregon, 2022: $51,501Oregon, 2023: $53,455Oregon, 2024: $55,451201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Oregon Legislature · 474262169● U.S. Congress · Oregon delegation · 8◆ Governor · 173■ Oregon agencies · 32005-09-012026-07-31

75 of 75 reviewed Oregon actions match · 40 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Oregon · 2024: $55,451 · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Oregon Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodOregonRankU.S. benchmark
2024$55,451#36 of 50$59,195
2023$53,455#40 of 50$58,088
2022$51,501#42 of 50$57,104
2021$55,852#36 of 50$59,365
2020$52,577#38 of 50$56,514
2019$48,660#40 of 50$53,683
2018$47,109#40 of 50$52,242
2017$46,985#39 of 50$51,006
2016$46,550#34 of 50$49,828
2015$44,964#40 of 50$49,396
2014$43,053#38 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Oregon · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Oregon · 2020–2024$83,011
Oregon rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oregon stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oregon has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oregon · $83,0112020–2024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $82,438 – $83,584Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oregon with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon · your comparison$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$83,0112020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Oregon households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Oregon · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Oregon · 2024$55,451
Oregon rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oregon
Real personal income per person history in Oregon$40.61K$51.21K$61.81K20142024
2024 · Oregon: $55,451 · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oregon Real personal income per person history
PeriodOregonCompare
2014$43,053
2015$44,964
2016$46,550
2017$46,985
2018$47,109
2019$48,660
2020$52,577
2021$55,852
2022$51,501
2023$53,455
2024$55,451

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oregon stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oregon has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oregon · $55,4512024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oregon with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon · your comparison$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oregon · state comparison

How Oregon raises taxes

Oregon's four ordinary personal-income-tax brackets are 4.75%, 6.75%, 8.75%, and 9.9%; taxable-income thresholds vary by filing status and tax year. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Oregon · FY2024$9.54B
Oregon rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oregon stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oregon has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oregon · $9.54BFY2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oregon with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon · your comparison$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Property tax

Local rates per $1,000

Counties apply the combined rates of the local taxing districts serving each property to taxable assessed value, so there is no single statewide property-tax rate. Oregon generally taxes the lower of real market value or maximum assessed value, subject to constitutional limits.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Oregon income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Oregon ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Oregon candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

53 statements from 12 candidates

2026 Oregon Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 11 statements

Brett Smith

1 statement

Pacific Green · Governor · OR

Income & wages

• Impose civil penalties of up to three times the underpaid surcharge for late or false wage band reporting.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

• Impose civil penalties of up to three times the underpaid surcharge for late or false wage band reporting.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Brett Smith campaign source ↗

Christine Drazan

10 statements

Republican · Governor · OR

Taxes & tax policy

Opt Oregon into a Federal Scholarship Tax Credit program to help over 575,000 students pay for tutoring, after-school programs, special education services and other educational supports.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Opt Oregon into a Federal Scholarship Tax Credit program to help over 575,000 students pay for tutoring, after-school programs, special education services and other educational supports.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 9 more statements from Christine Drazan
Taxes & tax policy

Veto new tax and fee increases.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Veto new tax and fee increases.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Cut taxes by increasing Oregon's standard deduction to better reflect today's cost-of-living pressures.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Cut taxes by increasing Oregon's standard deduction to better reflect today's cost-of-living pressures.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

Develop Oregon's workforce by expanding apprenticeships and CTE, aligning workforce development programs and our schools with employer needs, measuring success through job placement and wage growth and accelerating occupational license recognition.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Develop Oregon's workforce by expanding apprenticeships and CTE, aligning workforce development programs and our schools with employer needs, measuring success through job placement and wage growth and accelerating occupational license recognition.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Reform the Estate Tax.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Reform the Estate Tax.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Reform the Corporate Activity Tax (CAT) to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses and lower costs for consumers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Reform the Corporate Activity Tax (CAT) to reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses and lower costs for consumers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Reform the Corporate Activity Tax (CAT) to reduce the hidden costs it places on Oregon consumers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Reform the Corporate Activity Tax (CAT) to reduce the hidden costs it places on Oregon consumers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Provide Property Tax relief by lowering property taxes for veterans, veterans with disabilities and seniors over the age of 65.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Provide Property Tax relief by lowering property taxes for veterans, veterans with disabilities and seniors over the age of 65.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Today, by some estimates, Oregon has the third-largest data center industry in the country. Oregon has done more than its fair share, and we cannot continue to be the Wild West for data center development. For more than a decade, Oregon families and businesses have struggled under heavy regulation a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity

Candidate campaign source

Today, by some estimates, Oregon has the third-largest data center industry in the country. Oregon has done more than its fair share, and we cannot continue to be the Wild West for data center development. For more than a decade, Oregon families and businesses have struggled under heavy regulation and high taxation while data centers have received special tax treatment.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Expand first time homebuyer programs, including tax credits for first time homebuyers and down payment assistance programs using existing funds to help transition families from renters to homeowners.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Expand first time homebuyer programs, including tax credits for first time homebuyers and down payment assistance programs using existing funds to help transition families from renters to homeowners.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christine Drazan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Oregon U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 5 statements

Suzanne Bonamici

5 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · OR

Income & wages

Expand Paid Family Leave and Sick Days: In today’s workplace, taking time off to bond with a new baby or to care for a sick loved one is a luxury few can afford. We are the only industrialized nation that does not require some level of paid family leave, which means too many parents and caregivers a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Expand Paid Family Leave and Sick Days: In today’s workplace, taking time off to bond with a new baby or to care for a sick loved one is a luxury few can afford. We are the only industrialized nation that does not require some level of paid family leave, which means too many parents and caregivers are put in the impossible situation of having to choose between their need to earn a paycheck and caring for a new baby or sick family member. I am working to pass legislation that will provide 12 weeks of paid leave to care for a newborn or adopted child or a sick family member, and at least seven job-protected paid sick or safe days.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 4 more statements from Suzanne Bonamici
Income & wages

Support workers and increase the federal minimum wage: We are seeing constant attacks on the rights of workers to earn fair and prevailing wages, organize, collectively bargain, stay safe on the job, and avoid discrimination. The labor movement created and grew the middle class and gave workers a vo…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Civil rights and individual freedom

Candidate campaign source

Support workers and increase the federal minimum wage: We are seeing constant attacks on the rights of workers to earn fair and prevailing wages, organize, collectively bargain, stay safe on the job, and avoid discrimination. The labor movement created and grew the middle class and gave workers a voice on the job. I support the rights of labor unions and I’m helping to lead the fight to protect the right of workers to organize. I also helped the House pass legislation to raise the federal minimum wage, which has been stuck at $7.25 an hour for more than a decade, and I have championed efforts to address wage discrimination.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Fix our broken tax system: We must fix our broken tax system so everyone has a chance to get ahead. Republicans have passed tax cuts for corporations and billionaires, so working people pay more and the wealthiest pay less. We must repeal Trump’s tax cuts and implement progressive rather than regres…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Fix our broken tax system: We must fix our broken tax system so everyone has a chance to get ahead. Republicans have passed tax cuts for corporations and billionaires, so working people pay more and the wealthiest pay less. We must repeal Trump’s tax cuts and implement progressive rather than regressive tax policy so those at the very top pay their fair share.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Income & wages

Address income inequality and lower costs:As the late Senator Paul Wellstone said, “we all do better when we all do better.” But right now, inflation, Trump’s chaotic tariff policy, and unfair corporate practices are driving up prices for Americans and making it harder to get ahead. By protecting co…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Address income inequality and lower costs:As the late Senator Paul Wellstone said, “we all do better when we all do better.” But right now, inflation, Trump’s chaotic tariff policy, and unfair corporate practices are driving up prices for Americans and making it harder to get ahead. By protecting consumers, raising the federal minimum wage, supporting small businesses, ending chaotic and nonsensical trade policies, and enforcing antitrust laws, we can help make life more affordable for everyone.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

To solve our housing crisis, we must immediately increase the supply of affordable housing. I’ve secured more than $6.25 million in funding to build hundreds of affordable housing units in NW Oregon. I’m also working to increase funding for the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) to incentivize th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

To solve our housing crisis, we must immediately increase the supply of affordable housing. I’ve secured more than $6.25 million in funding to build hundreds of affordable housing units in NW Oregon. I’m also working to increase funding for the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) to incentivize the construction of more affordable housing. Access to a living wage job, job training opportunities, and universal health care will also help people who are unhoused.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Suzanne Bonamici — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗

2026 Oregon U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Chris Beck

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · OR

Taxes & tax policy

Adjusting excessive tax breaks on vacation and luxury homes and funneling those savings into programs that provide low-interest financing for first-time rural home buyers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Adjusting excessive tax breaks on vacation and luxury homes and funneling those savings into programs that provide low-interest financing for first-time rural home buyers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Beck — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Cliff Bentz

6 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · OR

Taxes & tax policy

Once again, the walkout worked, and cap and tax has not become the law of Oregon. Thank you, my Republican colleagues! Be assured that I will do all that I can in Washington DC to help you stop the misguided and economy wreaking plan that was HB 1530. But stay strong. The Democrats plan to force Cap…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cap and Trade

Candidate campaign source

Once again, the walkout worked, and cap and tax has not become the law of Oregon. Thank you, my Republican colleagues! Be assured that I will do all that I can in Washington DC to help you stop the misguided and economy wreaking plan that was HB 1530. But stay strong. The Democrats plan to force Cap & Tax on Oregonians is not going away.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Cliff Bentz campaign source 14 ↗
View 5 more statements from Cliff Bentz
Taxes & tax policy

Reduce Regulation, Lower Taxes

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reduce Regulation, Lower Taxes

Candidate campaign source

Reduce Regulation, Lower Taxes

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Cliff Bentz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

I will work in Congress – just as I did in the state senate – to strengthen our economy by directing investments toward rural Oregon, reducing regulations, lowering taxes and supporting President Trump’s policies that make our economy even stronger.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Campaign Issues

Candidate campaign source

I will work in Congress – just as I did in the state senate – to strengthen our economy by directing investments toward rural Oregon, reducing regulations, lowering taxes and supporting President Trump’s policies that make our economy even stronger.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Cliff Bentz campaign source 8 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Be assured that I will do all that I can in Washington DC to help you stop the misguided and economy wreaking plan that was HB 1530. But stay strong. The Democrats plan to force Cap & Tax on Oregonians is not going away.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Campaign Issues

Candidate campaign source

Be assured that I will do all that I can in Washington DC to help you stop the misguided and economy wreaking plan that was HB 1530. But stay strong. The Democrats plan to force Cap & Tax on Oregonians is not going away.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Cliff Bentz campaign source 14 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

This short 2020 February legislative session began contentiously because the Democrats immediately brought back Cap & “Tax” in the form of SB 1530. The Republicans made one simple request: Let the people vote on SB 1530. But the supermajority Democrats did not want their cap and trade “stealth tax” …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cap and Trade

Candidate campaign source

This short 2020 February legislative session began contentiously because the Democrats immediately brought back Cap & “Tax” in the form of SB 1530. The Republicans made one simple request: Let the people vote on SB 1530. But the supermajority Democrats did not want their cap and trade “stealth tax” on gas and diesel and natural gas to go to the people for a vote. They knew it would go down in flames.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Cliff Bentz campaign source 14 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

I will work in Congress – just as I did in the state senate – to strengthen our economy by directing investments toward rural Oregon, reducing regulations, lowering taxes and supporting President Trump’s policies that make our economy even stronger. I was one of the eleven Republican Senators that w…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reduce Regulation, Lower Taxes

Candidate campaign source

I will work in Congress – just as I did in the state senate – to strengthen our economy by directing investments toward rural Oregon, reducing regulations, lowering taxes and supporting President Trump’s policies that make our economy even stronger. I was one of the eleven Republican Senators that walked out of the senate to deny the Democrats a quorum so that the Gross Receipts Tax might be stopped. We were unsuccessful in stopping that tax, but we did call out the incredible damage it could do in an economic downturn. And now we are in that downturn. That tax makes it even more difficult for small business to survive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Cliff Bentz campaign source 8 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Oregon candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Oregon incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Oregon legislators and Oregon’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Oregon’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

80 matching sponsorships or proposals · 44 Oregon incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Attorney General Dan Rayfield

Attorney General of Oregon · D–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Attorney General Dan Rayfield
Oregon Legislature · HB 3302

Creates income or corporate excise tax credit for investment in affordable housing, available to taxpayer eligible for federal low-income housing credit, and allocated by Housing and Community Services Department.

Jun 25, 2023 · Did not pass

Attorney General Dan Rayfield · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 3302 (2023R1): Creates income or corporate excise tax credit for investment in affordable housing, available to taxpayer eligible for federal low-income housing credit, and allocated by Housing and Community Services Department.

2023-06-25: In committee upon adjournment. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oregon’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Creates income or corporate excise tax credit for investment in affordable housing, available to taxpayer eligible for federal low-income housing credit, and allocated by Housing and Community Services Department.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Gov. Tina Kotek

Governor of Oregon · D–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Gov. Tina Kotek
Oregon Legislature · HB 2008

Provides tax exemption for property of religious organization held or used solely to provide affordable housing to low income households.

Jul 14, 2021 · Enacted

Gov. Tina Kotek · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 2008 (2021R1): Provides tax exemption for property of religious organization held or used solely to provide affordable housing to low income households.

2021-09-25: Chapter 446, (2021 Laws): Effective date September 25, 2021. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Oregon’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Provides tax exemption for property of religious organization held or used solely to provide affordable housing to low income households.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Alek Skarlatos

Oregon House of Representatives, District 4 · R–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Alek Skarlatos
Oregon Legislature · HB 4109

Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.

Mar 6, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Alek Skarlatos · Sponsored / Rep. Lucetta Elmer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 4109 (2026R1): Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.

2026-03-06: In committee upon adjournment. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Repeals Enrolled Senate Bill 916 (2025), which authorized unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are unemployed due to a strike.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Andrea Salinas

U.S. House of Representatives, Oregon District 6 · D–OR

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Andrea Salinas
U.S. Congress · Oregon delegation · HR 6367

Social Security Data Transparency Act

Dec 2, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Andrea Salinas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Would require publication of Social Security claims, approvals, denials, pending claims and payment-processing statistics. This concerns administration and measurement of OASDI claims, not SSI.

2025-12-02: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment is recorded in this snapshot.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: People receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

wer;(F)percentage of callers that reach a representative;(G)average service time;(H)agent busy rate; and(I)percentage of calls handled by callback.(4)Old age and survivors benefitsWith respect to claims for a benefit under title II that is not a disability benefit under section 223, information measuring the—(A)percentage of claimants who received benefits within 2 weeks of applying;(B)average time to receive a benefit payment from the date an application is submitted;(C)benefits claims approved or denied;(D)benefits claims pending;(E)percentage of benefit claim appointments scheduled within 28 days of applying; and(F)percentage of claims filed online.(5)Disability determinationInformation related to disability insurance benefit claims under section 223 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423), including—(A)the average processing time of such claims;(B)the average time to receive a benefit payment from the date an application is submitted;(C)the number of initial determinations pending;(D)the number of such claims received;(E)the number of claims approved or denied;(F)the percentage of appointments scheduled within 28 days of the claimant applying;(G)the percentage of such claims filed online; and(H)processing times and percentage of such claims processed at the initial, reconsideration, and hearings levels.(6)Disability decision reconsiderationInformation related to the processing time for appeals of denials of a disability determination, including—(A)the average processing time of an appeal; and(B)the number of appeals filed and the number of decisions of such appeals.(7)Hearing informationInformation related to hearings conducted after the initial decision and reconsideration of a disability determination, including—(A)the average time it takes for a claimant to have a hearing;(B)the number of hearings conducted—(
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Oregon Legislature · HB 2009

Allows individuals who do not qualify for medical assistance or premium tax credits under Affordable Care Act to enroll in coordinated care organizations by paying premiums that cover actuarial value of health services.

Jun 30, 2019 · Did not pass

Rep. Andrea Salinas · Sponsored / Rep. Rob Nosse · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 2009 (2019R1): Allows individuals who do not qualify for medical assistance or premium tax credits under Affordable Care Act to enroll in coordinated care organizations by paying premiums that cover actuarial value of health services.

2019-06-30: In committee upon adjournment. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Allows individuals who do not qualify for medical assistance or premium tax credits under Affordable Care Act to enroll in coordinated care organizations by paying premiums that cover actuarial value of health services.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Anna Scharf

Oregon House of Representatives, District 23 · R–OR

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Anna Scharf
Oregon Legislature · HB 2443

Maintains applicable minimum wage rates, indexed for inflation as determined on April 30, 2023, until June 30, 2028.

Jun 25, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Anna Scharf · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 2443 (2023R1): Maintains applicable minimum wage rates, indexed for inflation as determined on April 30, 2023, until June 30, 2028.

2023-06-25: In committee upon adjournment. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Maintains applicable minimum wage rates, indexed for inflation as determined on April 30, 2023, until June 30, 2028.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ben Bowman

Oregon House of Representatives, District 25 · D–OR

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Ben Bowman
Oregon Legislature · SB 916

Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.

Jun 24, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Kathleen Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Dacia Grayber · Sponsored / Rep. Ben Bowman · Sponsored / Sen. Wlnsvey Campos · Sponsored / Sen. James I. Manning Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of SB 916 (2025R1): Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.

2025-07-02: Effective date, January 1, 2026. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Provides that an individual otherwise eligible for unemployment insurance benefits is not disqualified for any week that the individual's unemployment is due to a labor dispute in active progress at the individual's place of employment.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Oregon Legislature · HB 3422

Renames task force to create bridge program as Joint Task Force on Affordable Coverage and charges joint task force with creating comprehensive plan for expanded bridge program that provides affordable health insurance to individuals with incomes above 200 percent of federal poverty guidelines and meets specified criteria.

Jun 25, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Ben Bowman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Chief sponsorship of HB 3422 (2023R1): Renames task force to create bridge program as Joint Task Force on Affordable Coverage and charges joint task force with creating comprehensive plan for expanded bridge program that provides affordable health insurance to individuals with incomes above 200 percent of federal poverty guidelines and meets specified criteria.

2023-06-25: In committee upon adjournment. The session has adjourned. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Oregon evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Renames task force to create bridge program as Joint Task Force on Affordable Coverage and charges joint task force with creating comprehensive plan for expanded bridge program that provides affordable health insurance to individuals with incomes above 200 percent of federal poverty guidelines and meets specified criteria.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Oregon officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Oregon statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.