Oklahoma · individual fact

Oklahoma unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate3.2%2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents1,934,5032024 · #28 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer1.3%2025 · 11-month average · #28 of 50 · highest first

Oklahoma over time

Explore Oklahoma readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Oklahoma officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Oklahoma effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Oklahoma change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Oklahoma · source units
OklahomaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 3.2%2%4.7%7.3%Oklahoma, 2015: 4.3%Oklahoma, 2016: 4.6%Oklahoma, 2017: 4%Oklahoma, 2018: 3.3%Oklahoma, 2019: 3.1%Oklahoma, 2020: 6.3%Oklahoma, 2021: 4%Oklahoma, 2022: 3%Oklahoma, 2023: 3.1%Oklahoma, 2024: 3.2%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 15National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Oklahoma Legislature · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.● U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · 1◆ Governor · 1■ Oklahoma agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2015-12-012026-09-30

2 of 2 reviewed Oklahoma actions match · 2 date markers shown. 15 major events shown separately.

Oklahoma · 2024: 3.2% · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Oklahoma Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodOklahomaRankU.S. benchmark
20243.2%#34 of 504%
20233.1%#28 of 50Not available
20223%#32 of 50Not available
20214%#32 of 50Not available
20206.3%#35 of 50Not available
20193.1%#36 of 50Not available
20183.3%#34 of 50Not available
20174%#30 of 50Not available
20164.6%#27 of 50Not available
20154.3%#36 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Oklahoma · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Oklahoma · 20243.2%
Oklahoma rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oklahoma
Annual unemployment rate history in Oklahoma2.5%4.7%6.8%20152024
2024 · Oklahoma: 3.2% · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oklahoma Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodOklahomaCompare
20154.3%
20164.6%
20174%
20183.3%
20193.1%
20206.3%
20214%
20223%
20233.1%
20243.2%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 3.2%2024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma · your comparison3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oklahoma · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Oklahoma · 2025 · 11-month average1.3%
Oklahoma rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 1.3%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma · your comparison1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oklahoma · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Oklahoma · 20252.2%
Oklahoma rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oklahoma
Annual real GDP growth history in Oklahoma-5.9%1.1%8.2%20152025
2025 · Oklahoma: 2.2% · Rank #19 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oklahoma Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodOklahomaCompare
20153.9%
2016-1.9%
20171.3%
20181.8%
20192%
2020-4.3%
20212.1%
2022-0.6%
20236.6%
20242.2%
20252.2%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 2.2%2025 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma · your comparison2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oklahoma · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Oklahoma · December 2025101,000
Oklahoma rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oklahoma
Openings · number history in Oklahoma-965,1003,633,0008,231,100July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Oklahoma: 101,000 · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oklahoma Openings · number history
PeriodOklahomaCompare
July 202598,000
August 202596,000
September 2025102,000
October 2025101,000
November 2025108,000
December 2025101,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · 101,000December 2025 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma · your comparison101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Oklahoma candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

19 statements from 12 candidates

2026 Oklahoma Commissioner of Labor — General Election Field

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Mike Hall

2 statements

Libertarian · Commissioner of Labor · OK

Jobs & workforce context

I am an advocate for market-based wages. Wages are a private contract between two consenting parties. Minimum wage laws have unintended consequences. State-mandated price floors do what all government issued price floors do: they create surpluses, which in the world of labor means layoffs. Rather th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

I am an advocate for market-based wages. Wages are a private contract between two consenting parties. Minimum wage laws have unintended consequences. State-mandated price floors do what all government issued price floors do: they create surpluses, which in the world of labor means layoffs. Rather than helping entry-level workers, minimum wage laws lead to reduced hours or automating roles.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Mike Hall — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Mike Hall
Jobs & workforce context

Benefits should be tied to the individual, not to the employer, allowing for a mobile and free workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Benefits should be tied to the individual, not to the employer, allowing for a mobile and free workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Mike Hall — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Oklahoma Governor — General Election Field

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Cyndi Munson

1 statement

Democratic · Governor · OK

Jobs & workforce context

Cyndi believes the key to attracting and growing businesses in Oklahoma is an educated and healthy workforce. She wants to focus on policies that will help everyday Oklahomans take care of their families, and afford housing. She will work to institute mandatory paid family leave for parental and fam…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Cyndi believes the key to attracting and growing businesses in Oklahoma is an educated and healthy workforce. She wants to focus on policies that will help everyday Oklahomans take care of their families, and afford housing. She will work to institute mandatory paid family leave for parental and family caregiving. As a legislator, she supported fully funding childcare subsidies for families to get the childcare they need and will continue to fight for that as Governor. Cyndi supports incentives for the building of affordable housing in urban and rural Oklahoma and will stand up to insurance companies to lower home insurance costs for Oklahomans. Cyndi has continually authored legislation to raise the minimum wage and supported the state question earlier this year. She will make it a top priority as Governor to raise the minimum wage for all Oklahomans and provide pay raises for state employees.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Cyndi Munson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner — General Election Field

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Race groups · Page 1 of 4
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Oklahoma candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Oklahoma incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Oklahoma legislators and Oklahoma’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Oklahoma’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Oklahoma incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. James Lankford

U.S. Senate, Oklahoma · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. James Lankford
U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · S 4016

Stop Unemployment Fraud Act

Mar 5, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. James Lankford · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 4016 proposes identity-document verification procedures for unemployment-compensation claimants, including federal regulations and safeguards against improper denial or delay. James Lankford is the primary sponsor. Unemployment cash benefits relate to household money income; the bill is not enacted. The identity-verification amendments would apply to initial applications received at least two years after enactment.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Verification of applicant identity(a)In generalSection 303 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 503) is amended by adding at the end the following:(n)(1)The State agency charged with the administration of the State law shall certify that the State has procedures in place to verify the identity of claimants of unemployment compensation, including requiring the claimant to provide documentation of their identity, which shall consist of—(A)at least one currently valid Federal or State government-issued identification document; and(B)one or more supporting documents, which may include utility bills, lease agreements, voter registration cards, vehicle registration, insurance documents, or other reliable documents, so long as such documents are—(i)determined by the State to be sufficient to verify the identity of the claimant; or(ii)approved by the Secretary for such purpose.(2)Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of Labor shall promulgate regulations governing identity verification procedures for claimants of unemployment compensation used by State agencies. Such regulations shall—(A)take into account—(i)administrative costs, including for technology and cybersecurity systems; and(ii)any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate;(B)provide due process protections for claimants;(C)specify methods to ensure that the documentation required under paragraph (1)(A)—(i)is accurate, current, and reliable; and(ii)does not produce systematic mismatches that unfairly deny or delay the payment of unemployment compensation;(D)require safeguards to ensure that the procedures—(i)minimize false positive or negative rates;(ii)do not result in the flagging, denial, or delay of claims based on the personal characteristics of an individual, including race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or political affiliation or belief; and(iii)comply with applicable civil rights laws;(E)require that such procedures comply with best practices for privacy and cybersecurity, as determined by the Secretary of Labor;(F)any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate; and(G)include any other provisions necessary to ensure the proper implementation, oversight, and continuous improvement of data-matching practices under this subsection.(3)In this subsection, the term unemployment compensation has the meaning given the term in subsection (d)(2)(A)..(b)Effective dateThe amendments made by this Act shall apply, with respect to a State, to initial applications for unemployment compensation received by such State on or after the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Oklahoma officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Oklahoma statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.