Oklahoma · individual fact

Oklahoma income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Oklahoma’s tax structure.

Median household income$65.04K2020–2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$35.62K2020–2024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$58.69K2024 · #22 of 50 · highest first

Oklahoma over time

Explore Oklahoma readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Oklahoma officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Oklahoma effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Oklahoma change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Oklahoma · source units
OklahomaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $58,692$45.35K$53.11K$60.87KOklahoma, 2014: $51,516Oklahoma, 2015: $49,890Oklahoma, 2016: $46,855Oklahoma, 2017: $48,389Oklahoma, 2018: $50,420Oklahoma, 2019: $52,199Oklahoma, 2020: $53,434Oklahoma, 2021: $55,838Oklahoma, 2022: $56,239Oklahoma, 2023: $56,986Oklahoma, 2024: $58,692201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Oklahoma Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · 5◆ Governor · 3■ Oklahoma agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

11 of 11 reviewed Oklahoma actions match · 11 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Oklahoma · 2024: $58,692 · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Oklahoma Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodOklahomaRankU.S. benchmark
2024$58,692#22 of 50$59,195
2023$56,986#26 of 50$58,088
2022$56,239#25 of 50$57,104
2021$55,838#38 of 50$59,365
2020$53,434#34 of 50$56,514
2019$52,199#25 of 50$53,683
2018$50,420#27 of 50$52,242
2017$48,389#30 of 50$51,006
2016$46,855#32 of 50$49,828
2015$49,890#22 of 50$49,396
2014$51,516#12 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Oklahoma · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Oklahoma · 2020–2024$65,039
Oklahoma rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · $65,0392020–2024 · Rank #43 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $64,600 – $65,478Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma · your comparison$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$65,0392020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Oklahoma households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Oklahoma · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Oklahoma · 2024$58,692
Oklahoma rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Oklahoma
Real personal income per person history in Oklahoma$44.98K$53.11K$61.24K20142024
2024 · Oklahoma: $58,692 · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Oklahoma Real personal income per person history
PeriodOklahomaCompare
2014$51,516
2015$49,890
2016$46,855
2017$48,389
2018$50,420
2019$52,199
2020$53,434
2021$55,838
2022$56,239
2023$56,986
2024$58,692

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · $58,6922024 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma · your comparison$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Oklahoma · state comparison

How Oklahoma raises taxes

For tax year 2026, Oklahoma applies a 0% initial bracket followed by 2.5%, 3.5%, and 4.5% marginal rates; bracket thresholds vary by filing status. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Oklahoma · FY2024$4.51B
Oklahoma rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Oklahoma stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Oklahoma has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Oklahoma · $4.51BFY2024 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Oklahoma with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma · your comparison$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Sales and use tax

4.5% State + local

Oklahoma's State sales-and-use-tax rate is 4.5%, and county or municipal taxes may apply. Qualifying food and food ingredients are exempt from the State rate but can remain subject to local tax.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Oklahoma income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Oklahoma ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Oklahoma candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

61 statements from 20 candidates

2026 Oklahoma Attorney General — General Election Field

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Jon Echols

2 statements

Republican · Attorney General · OK

Taxes & tax policy

Priorities“I’m a proven conservative, seeking the office of Attorney General for all our families. Whether you are a political elite, or an everyday Oklahoman, all will be treated equally under the law.”BACK THE BLUE: respect law enforcement and our heroes in blue.DEFEND YOUR LIBERTIES: zealously ad…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Priorities“I’m a proven conservative, seeking the office of Attorney General for all our families. Whether you are a political elite, or an everyday Oklahoman, all will be treated equally under the law.”BACK THE BLUE: respect law enforcement and our heroes in blue.DEFEND YOUR LIBERTIES: zealously advocate for your freedoms from anyone who would try to take them while upholding the Judeo Christian values our nation was founded upon.DEFEND TAXPAYERS: serve as a watch dog of tax payer dollars unafraid of the deep state here in Oklahoma wasting your tax dollars.STAND WITH TRUMP: over 1,000 Oklahomans died of a drug overdose in 2023, we will support President Trump as he secures our borders and defeats the scourge that is fentanyl.STAND UP TO DEI: woke policies like DEI make us weaker and go against the idea of all being treated equally under the law. There should be no tolerance for DEI in the Attorney General’s Office.PROTECT OUR DAUGHTERS: protect our daughters from biological males in women’s sports.PARTNER WITH OUR COMMUNITY: maintain a strong working relationship with our state’s sovereign tribal nations.DEFEND PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS: protect our landowners from foreign adversaries and out of state special interest groups. Jon has a proven record of fighting the Chinese marijuana takeover of Oklahoma farmland.PROMOTE OKLAHOMA ENERGY: Support the Trump Administration’s EPA and stand up to environmental extremists attacking our state’s industry.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Jon Echols — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Jon Echols
Taxes & tax policy

DEFEND TAXPAYERS: serve as a watch dog of tax payer dollars unafraid of the deep state here in Oklahoma wasting your tax dollars.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

DEFEND TAXPAYERS: serve as a watch dog of tax payer dollars unafraid of the deep state here in Oklahoma wasting your tax dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Jon Echols — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Nick Coffey

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · OK

Taxes & tax policy

Nick will be a watch dog for our tax dollars and ensure Oklahomans aren't being taken advantage of by predatory companies.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Nick will be a watch dog for our tax dollars and ensure Oklahomans aren't being taken advantage of by predatory companies.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Nick Coffey — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Oklahoma Commissioner of Labor — General Election Field

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Kevin Dawson

3 statements

Democratic · Commissioner of Labor · OK

Income & wages

Protect workers from wage theft and ensure they receive wages earned under Oklahoma law.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Workplace Rights

Candidate campaign source

Protect workers from wage theft and ensure they receive wages earned under Oklahoma law.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Kevin Dawson — Part 69 verified source ↗
View 2 more statements from Kevin Dawson
Income & wages

Ensure wage laws, child labor protections, and state labor standards are upheld

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Ensure wage laws, child labor protections, and state labor standards are upheld

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Kevin Dawson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

Enforce wage laws, child-labor protections, and state labor standards.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Strategic Plan

Candidate campaign source

Enforce wage laws, child-labor protections, and state labor standards.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Kevin Dawson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Mike Hall

2 statements

Libertarian · Commissioner of Labor · OK

Income & wages

I am an advocate for market-based wages. Wages are a private contract between two consenting parties. Minimum wage laws have unintended consequences. State-mandated price floors do what all government issued price floors do: they create surpluses, which in the world of labor means layoffs. Rather th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

I am an advocate for market-based wages. Wages are a private contract between two consenting parties. Minimum wage laws have unintended consequences. State-mandated price floors do what all government issued price floors do: they create surpluses, which in the world of labor means layoffs. Rather than helping entry-level workers, minimum wage laws lead to reduced hours or automating roles.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Mike Hall — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Mike Hall
Income & wages

Opposing State-Mandated Wage Floors

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Platform

Candidate campaign source

Opposing State-Mandated Wage Floors

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Mike Hall — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Oklahoma Corporation Commissioner — General Election Field

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Rhonda Eastman

1 statement

Democratic · Corporation Commissioner · OK

Taxes & tax policy

Why should you vote? Because people before you fought for your right to. Because Steady drops in a bucket will eventually fill it up, but a Rainstorm of many drops at once will fill it quickly. Change happens when we stop being spectators to the decisions that impact our lives and start participatin…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Why should you vote? Because people before you fought for your right to. Because Steady drops in a bucket will eventually fill it up, but a Rainstorm of many drops at once will fill it quickly. Change happens when we stop being spectators to the decisions that impact our lives and start participating in the choices. But don't just vote, vote with purpose, vote with knowledge. Make a list of the things that you feel are wrong or impact your life, whether its utility rates higher than peoples rent, or tax money that EVERYONE pays being diverted from public education fund to private school vouchers. Cuts to social safety nets that many elderly and disabled rely on. Make your list, then figure out which candidates on either side aligns with what you need from your government, then VOTE WITH PURPOSE. If every registered voter were to vote and vote with KNOWLEDGE & PURPOSE, we will be the rainstorm of change.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Rhonda Eastman — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 4
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Oklahoma candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Oklahoma incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Oklahoma legislators and Oklahoma’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Oklahoma’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

11 matching sponsorships or proposals · 10 Oklahoma incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Brad Boles

Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 51 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brad Boles
Oklahoma Legislature · HB 1370

Motor Fuel Tax Code; repealer; reduction in federal excise tax on gasoline or diesel fuel; emergency.

May 18, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Brad Boles · Sponsored / Sen. Grant Green · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1370 repeals the Oklahoma provision that would replace a reduction in the federal gasoline or diesel excise tax with an equal state tax. The repeal removes that contingent tax adjustment; it does not itself establish a federal tax reduction or a measured decline in Midwest pump prices.

Signed by Kevin Stitt on 2026-05-18. Latest legislative entry: Approved by Governor 05/18/2026 (2026-05-14). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Midwest regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wisconsin. Oklahoma policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not an Oklahoma statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. REPEALER 68 O.S. 2021, Section 500.4A, is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Collin Duel

Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 31 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Collin Duel
Oklahoma Legislature · SB 250

Oklahoma Minimum Wage Act; allowing for alternative computation for wage under certain circumstances. Effective date.

May 26, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Kristen Thompson · Sponsored / Rep. Collin Duel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 250 revises how tips, meals, and lodging count toward minimum wages, replacing the prior 50-percent credit limit with a federal cash-wage floor and allowing credits when the state minimum exceeds the federal minimum. It became law without the governor’s signature. Cash wages and tips relate to money income; lodging and meals are not treated as cash income here.

Became law without the governor’s signature on 2025-05-26. Latest legislative entry: Becomes law without Governor's signature 05/26/2025 (2025-05-27). Historical enactment does not establish implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 197.16. A. To compute the minimum wage of any employee coming within the purview of the Oklahoma Minimum Wage Act, credit toward the minimum required wage shall be given for any tips or gratuities, meals, or lodging received by the employee provided that the employer pays a cash wage of not less than what is required under 29 C.F.R., Section 531.50(a)(1). B. To compute the minimum wage of any employee coming within the purview of the Oklahoma Minimum Wage Act should the minimum wage exceed the current federal minimum wage, credit toward the minimum required wage may be given for any tips or gratuities, meals, or lodging received by the employee. SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kevin Hern

U.S. House of Representatives, Oklahoma District 1 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kevin Hern
U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · HR 5463

Choice Arrangement

Sep 18, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Kevin Hern · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.R. 5463 proposes statutory treatment of employer-funded health reimbursement arrangements integrated with individual health-insurance coverage, including coverage, nondiscrimination, substantiation, and notice conditions. Kevin Hern is the primary sponsor. The individual-market provisions concern insurance financing for working-age people; the bill is not enacted.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Treatment of health reimbursement arrangements integrated with individual market coverage(a)In generalSection 9815(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—(1)by striking Exception.—Notwithstanding subsection (a) and inserting the following:Exceptions.—(1)Self-insured group health plansNotwithstanding subsection (a), and(2)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(2)Custom health option and individual care expense arrangements(A)In generalFor purposes of this subchapter, a custom health option and individual care expense arrangement shall be treated as meeting the requirements of section 9802 and sections 2705, 2711, 2713, and 2715 of title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act.(B)Custom health option and individual care expense arrangements definedFor purposes of this section, the term custom health option and individual care expense arrangement means a health reimbursement arrangement—(i)which is an employer-provided group health plan funded solely by employer contributions to provide payments or reimbursements for medical care subject to a maximum fixed dollar amount for a period,(ii)under which such payments or reimbursements may only be made for medical care provided during periods during which the individual is covered—(I)under individual health insurance coverage (other than coverage that consists solely of excepted benefits), or(II)under part A and B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act or part C of such title,(iii)which meets the nondiscrimination requirements of subparagraph (C),(iv)which meets the substantiation requirements of subparagraph (D), and(v)which meets the notice requirements of subparagraph (E).(C)Nondiscrimination(i)In generalAn arrangement meets the requirements of this subparagraph if an employer offering such arrangement to an employee within a specified class of employee—(I)offers such arrangement to all employees within such specified class on the same terms, and(II)does not offer any other group health plan (other than an account-based group health plan or a group health plan that consists solely of excepted benefits) to any employees within such specified class.In the case of an employer who offers a group health plan provided through health insurance coverage in the small group market (that is subject to section 2701 of the Public Health Service Act) to all employees within such specified class, subclause (II) shall not apply to such group health plan.(ii)Specified class of employeeFor purposes of this subparagraph, any of the following may be designated as a specified class of employee:(I)Full-time employees.(II)Part-time employees.(III)Salaried employees.(IV)Non-salaried employees.(V)Employees whose primary site of employment is in the same rating area.(VI)Employees who are included in a unit of employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement to which the employer is subject (determined under rules similar to the rules of section 105(h)).(VII)Employees who have not met a group health plan, or health insurance issuer offering group health insurance coverage, waiting period requirement that satisfies section 2708 of the Public Health Service Act.(VIII)Seasonal employees.(IX)Employees who are nonresident aliens and who receive no earned income (within the meaning of section 911(d)(2)) from the employer which constitutes income from sources within the United States (within the meaning of section 861(a)(3)).(X)Under such rules as the Secretary may prescribe, employees who are hired for temporary placement with an unrelated person that is not the common law employer.(XI)Such other classes of employees as the Secretary may designate.An employer may designate (in such manner as is prescribed by the Secretary) two or more of the classes described in the preceding subclauses as the specified class of employees to which the arrangement is offered for purposes of applying this subparagraph.(iii)Special rule for new hiresAn employer may designate prospectively so much of a specified class of employees as are hired after a date set by the employer. Such subclass of employees shall be treated as the specified class for purposes of applying clause (i).(iv)Rules for determining type of employeeFor purposes for clause (ii), any determination of full-time, part-time, or seasonal employment status shall be made under rules similar to the rules of section 105(h) or 4980H, whichever the employer elects for the plan year. Such election shall apply with respect to all employees of the employer for the plan year.(v)Permitted variationFor purposes of clause (i)(I), an arrangement shall not fail to be treated as provided on the same terms within a specified class merely because the maximum dollar amount of payments and reimbursements which may be made under the terms of the arrangement for the year with respect to each employee within such class—(I)increases as additional dependents of the employee are covered under the arrangement, and(II)increases with respect to a participant as the age of the participant increases, but not in excess of an amount equal to 300 percent of the lowest maximum dollar amount with respect to such a participant determined without regard to age.(D)Substantiation requirementsAn arrangement meets the requirements of this subparagraph if the arrangement has reasonable procedures to substantiate—(i)that the participant and any dependents are, or will be, enrolled in coverage described in subparagraph (B)(ii) as of the beginning of the plan year of the arrangement (or as of the beginning of coverage under the arrangement in the case of an employee who first becomes eligible to participate in the arrangement after the date notice is given with respect to the plan under subparagraph (E) (determined without regard to clause (iii) thereof), and(ii)any requests made for payment or reimbursement of medical care under the arrangement and that the participant and any dependents remain so enrolled.(E)Notice(i)In generalExcept as provided in clause (iii), an arrangement meets the requirements of this subparagraph if, under the arrangement, each employee eligible to participate is, not later than 60 days before the beginning of the plan year, given written notice of the employee’s rights and obligations under the arrangement which—(I)is sufficiently accurate and comprehensive to apprise the employee of such rights and obligations, and(II)is written in a manner calculated to be understood by the average employee eligible to participate.(ii)Notice requirementsSuch notice shall include such information as the Secretary may by regulation prescribe.(iii)Notice deadline for certain employeesIn the case of an employee—(I)who first becomes eligible to participate in the arrangement after the date notice is given with respect to the plan under clause (i) (determined without regard to this clause), or(II)whose employer is first established fewer than 120 days before the beginning of the first plan year of the arrangement,the requirements of this subparagraph shall be treated as met if the notice required under clause (i) is provided not later than the date the arrangement may take effect with respect to such employee..(b)Inclusion of CHOICE arrangement permitted benefits on W–2(1)In generalSection 6051(a) of such Code is amended by striking and at the end of paragraph (18), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (19) and inserting , and, and by inserting after paragraph (19) the following new paragraph:(20)the total amount of permitted benefits for enrolled individuals under a custom health option and individual care expense arrangement (as defined in section 9815(b)(2)) with respect to such employee..(c)Treatment of current rules relating to certain arrangements(1)No inferenceTo the extent not inconsistent with the amendments made by this section—(A)no inference shall be made from such amendments with respect to the rules prescribed in the Federal Register on June 20, 2019, (84 Fed. Reg. 28888) relating to health reimbursement arrangements and other account-based group health plans, and(B)any reference to custom health option and individual care expense arrangements shall for purposes of such rules be treated as including a reference to individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements.(2)Other conforming of rulesThe Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Labor shall modify such rules as may be necessary to conform to the amendments made by this section.(d)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kyle Hilbert

Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 29 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kyle Hilbert
Oklahoma Legislature · HB 4422

Poor persons; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program; SAVE program; notification; Attorney General; effective date.

May 5, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Kyle Hilbert · Sponsored / Sen. Lonnie Paxton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 4422 proposed SAVE immigration-status checks before TANF benefits and notice to the attorney general, with an immigration-enforcement referral if lawful presence remained unverifiable. This connects to TANF cash-benefit access and a subset of foreign-born residents. The bill did not become law in the reviewed session.

The reviewed regular session ended without recorded enactment. Latest legislative entry: Placed on General Order (2026-05-05). Proposed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

G. 1. The Department of Human Services, in making a determination of a legal immigrant or qualified alien as defined in subsection A of this section, shall verify an applicant's status by utilizing the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services' Systematic Alien Verification of Entitlements (SAVE) system. An applicant's legal status in the United States shall be confirmed prior to an applicant receiving benefits under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. 2. Upon final determination that an applicant's SAVE status does not indicate the person is lawfully in the United States, the Depa rtment of Human Services shall notify the Oklahoma Attorney General's Office. The Office shall review the case and shall notify the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency if an applicant's legal presence in the United States is unverifiable. 3. The Department of Human Services shall post a notice on its website providing information about TANF and on its application portal notifying applicants that their immigration status will be reviewed and if unverified the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency will be notified.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Stephanie I. Bice

U.S. House of Representatives, Oklahoma District 5 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Stephanie I. Bice
U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · HR 3089

More Paid Leave for More Americans Act

Apr 30, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Stephanie I. Bice · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.R. 3089 proposes grants for qualifying state paid-family-leave programs, requiring at least six weeks of birth or adoption leave benefits with specified wage replacement. Stephanie Bice is the primary sponsor. Grants depend on qualifying state programs; the proposal does not establish that Oklahoma has implemented one, and the bill is not enacted.

Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Armed Services, Oversight and Government Reform, House Administration, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(d)Paid family leave program requirements (1)Program requirementsA paid family leave program described in this subsection shall, at a minimum— (A)provide, through the covered partnership, a paid family leave benefit to eligible employees because of— (i)the birth of a son or daughter of an eligible employee and in order to care for such son or daughter; and (ii)the placement of a son or daughter with the eligible employee for adoption; (B)provide 6 weeks of paid family leave benefits; (C) annually establish a weekly maximum benefit amount that is equal to 150 percent of the State’s average weekly wage (based on the most recent calendar year for which data is available from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages program of the BLS); (D)only permit an eligible employee to be entitled to a leave benefit under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A) for a birth or placement of a son or daughter during the 12-month period beginning on the date of such birth or placement; (E)require the establishment and use of a covered partnership; and (F)establish premium rates or a financing method to fund the paid family leave program for employees, employers, or both to pay. (2)Paid family leave benefitFor the purposes of this title, a paid family leave benefit provided to an eligible employee shall, at a minimum, include weekly compensation in an amount (not to exceed the amount described in paragraph (1)(C)) equal to the product of the average weekly earnings of the eligible employee and— (A)in the case of an eligible employee whose earnings for the 4 most recently completed calendar quarters that immediately precede the paid family leave benefit request are less than or equal to the poverty line (as defined in section 673 of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902)) applicable to a 4-person household, 67 percent; (B)in the case of an eligible employee whose earnings for such calendar quarters are more than such poverty line, but less than the amount that is double such poverty line, a percentage equal to— (i)67 percent, minus (ii)the product of— (I)17 percent; and (II)the percentage by which the employee’s earnings exceed such poverty line; or (C)in the case of any other eligible employee, 50 percent. (3)Recalculation of benefit amountThe weekly compensation calculated under paragraph (2) for an eligible employee shall be recalculated each time such employee applies for a paid family leave benefit. (4)Employees with multiple employersIn the case that an employee is employed by multiple employers, such an employee is entitled to receive a benefit from each employer, but the employee may not receive a total combined weekly benefit in excess of the maximum benefit amount established by a State pursuant to paragraph (1)(C). (5)Employer self-administration flexibilityIn the case that a State’s paid family leave program includes a requirement for employer participation, States shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section only if they allow employers to self-administer paid family leave benefits to eligible employees, provided such benefits meet or exceed the paid family leave program established by the State that meets the requirements of this subsection. (6) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit the ability of a State to provide additional paid family leave benefits (including benefits for reasons described in section 102(a)(1) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2612(a)(1))) in excess of the benefits required to be provided under this subsection.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Tom Cole

U.S. House of Representatives, Oklahoma District 4 · R–OK

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Tom Cole
U.S. Congress · Oklahoma delegation · HR 9187

Bipartisan Social Security Commission Act of 2026

Jun 8, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Tom Cole · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.R. 9187 proposes a bipartisan commission to recommend legislation for 75-year solvency of the Social Security retirement-survivors and disability trust funds. Tom Cole is the primary sponsor. It creates a proposed review and legislative process, not an immediate change to benefits or beneficiary counts; no enactment is recorded.

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The proposed commission would recommend legislation for retirement-survivors and disability trust-fund solvency. This is an indirect policy-review relationship to OASDI; it does not itself change benefit eligibility, payments or the number of beneficiaries. This connection does not establish causation or a change in the earlier measured value.

Retained Oklahoma evidence context: People receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.EstablishmentThere is established in the legislative branch a commission to be known as the Commission on Long-Term Social Security Solvency (in this Act referred to as the Commission). 3.Duty of the CommissionNot later than 1 year after the initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall transmit to Congress a special message that includes recommendations and proposed legislation for achieving solvency in each of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund for a period of at least 75 years beginning on the date that is 1 year after the initial meeting of the Commission. Such message shall be approved by at least 9 members of the Commission.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Oklahoma officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Oklahoma statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.